1
|
Vaios EJ, Shenker RF, Hendrickson PG, Wan Z, Niedzwiecki D, Winter SF, Shih HA, Dietrich J, Wang C, Salama AKS, Clarke JM, Allen K, Sperduto P, Mullikin T, Kirkpatrick JP, Floyd SR, Reitman ZJ. Long-Term Intracranial Outcomes With Combination Dual Immune-Checkpoint Blockade and Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients With Melanoma and Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1507-1518. [PMID: 38097090 PMCID: PMC11056239 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The intracranial benefit of offering dual immune-checkpoint inhibition (D-ICPI) with ipilimumab and nivolumab to patients with melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BMs) is unknown. We hypothesized that D-ICPI improves local control compared with SRS alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with melanoma or NSCLC treated with SRS from 2014 to 2022 were evaluated. Patients were stratified by treatment with D-ICPI, single ICPI (S-ICPI), or SRS alone. Local recurrence, intracranial progression (IP), and overall survival were estimated using competing risk and Kaplan-Meier analyses. IP included both local and distant intracranial recurrence. RESULTS Two hundred eighty-eight patients (44% melanoma, 56% NSCLC) with 1,704 BMs were included. Fifty-three percent of patients had symptomatic BMs. The median follow-up was 58.8 months. Twelve-month local control rates with D-ICPI, S-ICPI, and SRS alone were 94.73% (95% CI, 91.11%-96.90%), 91.74% (95% CI, 89.30%-93.64%), and 88.26% (95% CI, 84.07%-91.41%). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, only D-ICPI was significantly associated with reduced local recurrence (P = .0032). On multivariate Cox regression, D-ICPI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.4003; 95% CI, 0.1781-0.8728; P = .0239) and planning target volume (HR, 1.022; 95% CI, 1.004-1.035; P = .0059) correlated with local control. One hundred seventy-three (60%) patients developed IP. The 12-month cumulative incidence of IP was 41.27% (95% CI, 30.27%-51.92%), 51.86% (95% CI, 42.78%-60.19%), and 57.15% (95% CI, 44.98%-67.59%) after D-ICPI, S-ICPI, and SRS alone. On competing risk analysis, only D-ICPI was significantly associated with reduced IP (P = .0408). On multivariate Cox regression, D-ICPI (HR, 0.595; 95% CI, 0.373-0.951; P = .0300) and presentation with >10 BMs (HR, 2.492; 95% CI, 1.668-3.725; P < .0001) remained significantly correlated with IP. The median overall survival after D-ICPI, S-ICPI, and SRS alone was 26.1 (95% CI, 15.5-40.7), 21.5 (16.5-29.6), and 17.5 (11.3-23.8) months. S-ICPI, fractionation, and histology were not associated with clinical outcomes. There was no difference in hospitalizations or neurologic adverse events between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS The addition of D-ICPI for patients with melanoma and NSCLC undergoing SRS is associated with improved local and intracranial control. This appears to be an effective strategy, including for patients with symptomatic or multiple BMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene J Vaios
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Rachel F Shenker
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Peter G Hendrickson
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Zihan Wan
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Duke Cancer Institute Biostatistics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sebastian F Winter
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Helen A Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chunhao Wang
- Departments of Medical Physics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - April K S Salama
- Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jeffrey M Clarke
- Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Karen Allen
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Paul Sperduto
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Trey Mullikin
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - John P Kirkpatrick
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Scott R Floyd
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Zachary J Reitman
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gallitto M, Pan PC, Chan MD, Milano MT, Wang TJC. The role of radiotherapy in immunotherapy strategies in the central nervous system. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S66-S75. [PMID: 38437664 PMCID: PMC10911795 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The clinical efficacy and relative tolerability of adverse effects of immune checkpoint immunotherapy have led to its increasingly routine use in the management of multiple advanced solid malignancies. Radiation therapy (RT) is well-known to have both local and distant immunomodulatory effects, which has led to extensive investigation into the synergism of these 2 therapies. While the central nervous system (CNS) has historically been thought to be a sanctuary site, well-protected by the blood-brain barrier from the effects of immunotherapy, over the last several years studies have shown the benefits of these drugs, particularly in metastatic disease involving the CNS. This review explores current progress and the future of combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Gallitto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Peter C Pan
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York , USA
| | - Michael D Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael T Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Tony J C Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mehkri Y, Windermere SA, Still MEH, Yan SC, Goutnik M, Melnick K, Doonan B, Ghiaseddin AP, Rahman M. The Safety and Efficacy of Concurrent Immune Checkpoint Blockade and Stereotactic Radiosurgery Therapy with Practitioner and Researcher Recommendations. World Neurosurg 2024; 181:e133-e153. [PMID: 37739175 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.09.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown growing promise in the treatment of brain metastases, especially combined with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The combination of ICIs with SRS has been studied for efficacy as well as increasing radiation necrosis risks. In this review, we compare clinical outcomes of radiation necrosis, intracranial control, and overall survival between patients with brain metastases treated with either SRS alone or SRS-ICI combination therapy. METHODS A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane was performed in May 2023 for articles comparing the safety and efficacy of SRS/ICI versus SRS-alone for treating brain metastases. RESULTS The search criteria identified 1961 articles, of which 48 met inclusion criteria. Combination therapy with SRS and ICI does not lead to significant increases in incidence of radiation necrosis either radiographically or symptomatically. Overall, no difference was found in intracranial control between SRS-alone and SRS-ICI combination therapy. Combination therapy is associated with increased median overall survival. Notably, some comparative studies observed decreased neurologic deaths, challenging presumptions that improved survival is due to greater systemic control. The literature supports SRS-ICI administration within 4 weeks of another for survival but remains inconclusive, requiring further study for other outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS Combination SRS-ICI therapy is associated with significant overall survival benefit for patients with brain metastases without significantly increasing radiation necrosis risks compared to SRS alone. Although intracranial control rates appear to be similar between the 2 groups, timing of treatment delivery may improve control rates and demands further study attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuf Mehkri
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Megan E H Still
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Sandra C Yan
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Michael Goutnik
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Melnick
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Bently Doonan
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Ashley P Ghiaseddin
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Maryam Rahman
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hall J, Lui K, Tan X, Shumway J, Collichio F, Moschos S, Sengupta S, Chaudhary R, Quinsey C, Jaikumar S, Forbes J, Andaluz N, Zuccarello M, Struve T, Vatner R, Pater L, Breneman J, Weiner A, Wang K, Shen C. Factors associated with radiation necrosis and intracranial control in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and stereotactic radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2023; 189:109920. [PMID: 37769968 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Emerging data suggest immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or radiotherapy (SRT) may work synergistically, potentially increasing both efficacy and toxicity. This manuscript characterizes factors associated with intracranial control and radiation necrosis in this group. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients had non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, or melanoma and were treated from 2013 to 2021 at two institutions with ICI and SRS/SRT. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to analyze factors associated with local failure (LF) and grade 2+ (G2 + ) radiation necrosis. RESULTS There were 179 patients with 549 metastases. The median follow up from SRS/SRT was 14.7 months and the median tumor size was 7 mm (46 tumors ≥ 20 mm). Rates of LF and G2 + radiation necrosis per metastasis were 5.8% (32/549) and 6.9% (38/549), respectively. LF rates for ICI +/- 1 month from time of radiation versus not were 3% (8/264) and 8% (24/285) (p = 0.01), respectively. G2 + radiation necrosis rates for PD-L1 ≥ 50% versus < 50% were 17% (11/65) and 3% (5/203) (p=<0.001), respectively. PD-L1 ≥ 50% remained significantly associated with G2 + radiation necrosis on multivariate analysis (p = 0.03). Rates of intracranial failure were 54% (80/147) and 17% (4/23) (p = 0.001) for those without and with G2 + radiation necrosis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS PD-L1 expression (≥50%) may be associated with higher rates of G2 + radiation necrosis, and there may be improved intracranial control following the development of radiation necrosis. Administration of ICIs with SRS/SRT is overall safe, and there may be some local control benefit to delivering these concurrently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Kevin Lui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Xianming Tan
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - John Shumway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Frances Collichio
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stergios Moschos
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Soma Sengupta
- Department of Neurology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Rekha Chaudhary
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Carolyn Quinsey
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sivakumar Jaikumar
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jonathan Forbes
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Norberto Andaluz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Mario Zuccarello
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Timothy Struve
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ralph Vatner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Luke Pater
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - John Breneman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ashley Weiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kyle Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Colette Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Antelo G, Comas S, Casas F, Valduvieco I, Barreto T, Laplana M, Mases J, Oses G, Mollà M. Clinical outcomes and timing on the combination of focal radiation therapy and immunotherapy for the treatment of brain metastases. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1236398. [PMID: 37915576 PMCID: PMC10616465 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1236398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Radiotherapy is one of the standard treatments for brain metastases (BM). Over the past years, the introduction of immunotherapy as routine treatment for solid tumors has forced investigators to review and evaluate how it would interact with radiation. Radiation and Immunotherapy have shown a synergic effect activating the host's immune system and enhancing treatment response. The combinatory effect on BM is currently under investigation. Methods Data published on Pubmed to determine toxicity, survival, treatment characteristics and timing on the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy for the treatment of BM has been reviewed. Results Mostly retrospective reviews report an improvement of intracranial progression free survival (iPFS) when combining radioimmunotherapy for BM patients. Two systematic reviews and meta-analysis and one phase II prospective trial also report a benefit on iPFS without an increase of toxicity. Among the published literature, the definition of concurrency is heterogeneous, being one month or even narrowed intervals correlated to better clinical outcomes. Toxicity due to concurrent radioimmunotherapy, specifically symptomatic radionecrosis, is also directly analyzed and reported to be low, similar to the toxicity rates secondary to stereotactic radiosurgery alone. Conclusion Radiation combined with immunotherapy has shown in predominantly retrospective reviews a synergic effect on the treatment of BM. The concurrent combination of radioimmunotherapy is a feasible therapeutic strategy and seems to improve clinical outcomes, especially iPFS, when delivered within <30 days. Larger prospective and randomized studies are needed to establish reliable outcomes, best delivery strategies and toxicity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Antelo
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Silvia Comas
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Catalá d'Oncologia (ICO), Badalona, Badalona, Spain
| | - Francesc Casas
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Izaskun Valduvieco
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tanny Barreto
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Laplana
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joel Mases
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gabriela Oses
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Meritxell Mollà
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ahmad A, Khan P, Rehman AU, Batra SK, Nasser MW. Immunotherapy: an emerging modality to checkmate brain metastasis. Mol Cancer 2023; 22:111. [PMID: 37454123 PMCID: PMC10349473 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-023-01818-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The diagnosis of brain metastasis (BrM) has historically been a dooming diagnosis that is nothing less than a death sentence, with few treatment options for palliation or prolonging life. Among the few treatment options available, brain radiotherapy (RT) and surgical resection have been the backbone of therapy. Within the past couple of years, immunotherapy (IT), alone and in combination with traditional treatments, has emerged as a reckoning force to combat the spread of BrM and shrink tumor burden. This review compiles recent reports describing the potential role of IT in the treatment of BrM in various cancers. It also examines the impact of the tumor microenvironment of BrM on regulating the spread of cancer and the role IT can play in mitigating that spread. Lastly, this review also focuses on the future of IT and new clinical trials pushing the boundaries of IT in BrM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aatiya Ahmad
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE-68198, USA
| | - Parvez Khan
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE-68198, USA
| | - Asad Ur Rehman
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE-68198, USA
| | - Surinder Kumar Batra
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE-68198, USA
- Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA
- Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE-68198, USA
| | - Mohd Wasim Nasser
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE-68198, USA.
- Fred and Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tian W, Chu X, Tanzhu G, Zhou R. Optimal timing and sequence of combining stereotactic radiosurgery with immune checkpoint inhibitors in treating brain metastases: clinical evidence and mechanistic basis. J Transl Med 2023; 21:244. [PMID: 37020242 PMCID: PMC10077682 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04089-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent evidence has shown that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are efficacious for treating brain metastases of various primary tumors. However, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and the blood-brain barrier (BBB) or blood-tumor barrier (BTB) essentially restrict the efficacy of ICIs. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can be a powerful ally to ICIs due to its trait of disrupting the BBB/BTB and increasing the immunogenicity of brain metastases. The combination of SRS + ICI has shown synergy in brain metastases in several retrospective studies. Nevertheless, the optimal schedule for the combination of SRS and ICI in brain metastases is yet to be determined. In this review, we summarized the current clinical and preclinical evidence on the timing and sequence of SRS + ICI to provide insight into the current state of knowledge about this important area in patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wentao Tian
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 87 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008, China
| | - Xianjing Chu
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 87 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008, China
| | - Guilong Tanzhu
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 87 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008, China
| | - Rongrong Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 87 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha, 410008, China.
- Xiangya Lung Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mantziaris G, Pikis S, Xu Z, Mullen R, Alzate J, Bernstein K, Kondziolka D, Wei Z, Niranjan A, Lunsford LD, Liscak R, May J, Lee CC, Yang HC, Coupé FL, Mathieu D, Sheehan K, Sheehan D, Palmer JD, Perlow HK, Peker S, Samanci Y, Peterson J, Trifiletti DM, Shepard MJ, Elhamdani S, Wegner RE, Speckter H, Hernandez W, Warnick RE, Sheehan J. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intraventricular Metastases: A Multicenter Study. Neurosurgery 2023; 92:565-573. [PMID: 36512817 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraventricular metastases (IVMs) are uncommon, and their optimal management remains debatable. OBJECTIVE To define the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of IVMs. METHODS This retrospective, multicenter study included patients managed with SRS for IVMs. SRS-induced adverse events, local tumor or intracranial progression, and the frequency of new-onset hydrocephalus or leptomeningeal spread were documented. Analyses of variables related to patient neuroimaging or clinical outcomes were also performed. RESULTS The cohort included 160 patients from 11 centers who underwent SRS for treatment of 1045 intracranial metastases, of which 196 were IVMs. The median survival from SRS was 10 months. Of the 154 patients and 190 IVMs with imaging follow-up, 94 patients (61%) experienced distant intracranial disease progression and 16 IVMs (8.4%) progressed locally. The 12- and 24-month local IVM control rates were 91.4% and 86.1%, respectively. Sixteen (10%) and 27 (17.5%) patients developed hydrocephalus and leptomeningeal dissemination post-SRS, respectively. Adverse radiation effects were documented in 24 patients (15%). Eleven patients (6.9%) died because of intracranial disease progression. CONCLUSION SRS is an effective treatment option for IVMs, with a local IVM control rate comparable with SRS for parenchymal brain metastases. Leptomeningeal spread and hydrocephalus in patients with IVM occur in a minority of patients, but these patients warrant careful follow-up to detect these changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Mantziaris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Stylianos Pikis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Reed Mullen
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA
| | - Juan Alzate
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Roman Liscak
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jaromir May
- Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - François-Louis Coupé
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - David Mathieu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du CHUS, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Kimball Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Darrah Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Haley K Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Selcuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yavuz Samanci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jennifer Peterson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Matthew J Shepard
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Shahed Elhamdani
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Rodney E Wegner
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Ohio, USA
| | - Herwin Speckter
- Dominican Gamma Knife Center and Radiology Department, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Wenceslao Hernandez
- Dominican Gamma Knife Center and Radiology Department, CEDIMAT, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Ronald E Warnick
- Gamma Knife Center, Jewish Hospital, Mayfield Clinic, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Matsui JK, Perlow HK, Raj RK, Nalin AP, Lehrer EJ, Kotecha R, Trifiletti DM, McClelland S, Kendra K, Williams N, Owen DH, Presley CJ, Thomas EM, Beyer SJ, Blakaj DM, Ahluwalia MS, Raval RR, Palmer JD. Treatment of Brain Metastases: The Synergy of Radiotherapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Biomedicines 2022; 10:2211. [PMID: 36140312 PMCID: PMC9496359 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10092211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases are a devastating sequela of common primary cancers (e.g., lung, breast, and skin) and have limited effective therapeutic options. Previously, systemic chemotherapy failed to demonstrate significant benefit in patients with brain metastases, but in recent decades, targeted therapies and more recently immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have yielded promising results in preclinical and clinical studies. Furthermore, there is significant interest in harnessing the immunomodulatory effects of radiotherapy (RT) to synergize with ICIs. Herein, we discuss studies evaluating the impact of RT dose and fractionation on the immune response, early studies supporting the synergistic interaction between RT and ICIs, and ongoing clinical trials assessing the benefit of combination therapy in patients with brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Haley K. Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Rohit K. Raj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Ansel P. Nalin
- College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Eric J. Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA
| | | | - Shearwood McClelland
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | - Kari Kendra
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Nicole Williams
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Dwight H. Owen
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Carolyn J. Presley
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Evan M. Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Sasha J. Beyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Dukagjin M. Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Manmeet S. Ahluwalia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL 33176, USA
| | - Raju R. Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Joshua D. Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|