Superior outcomes with Argatroban for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Thrombosis prophylaxis following trauma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review explores the persistent occurrence of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in major trauma patients despite standard thrombosis prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH). It investigates the inadequacies of standard pharmacologic prophylaxis and proposes alternative approaches not covered in current trauma guidelines.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies highlight the effectiveness of monitoring and adjusting subcutaneous LMWH doses based on anti-Xa levels for the purpose of reducing VTE in trauma patients. The need for dose adaptation arises due to factors like fluctuating organ function, varying antithrombin levels, interaction with plasma proteins, and altered bioavailability influenced by oedema or vasopressor use. Additionally, promising alternatives such as intravenous LMWH, UFH, and argatroban have shown success in intensive care settings.

SUMMARY

The standard dosing of subcutaneous LMWH is often insufficient for effective thrombosis prophylaxis in trauma patients. A more personalised approach, adjusting doses based on specific effect levels like anti-Xa or choosing an alternative mode of anticoagulation, could reduce the risk of insufficient prophylaxis and subsequent VTE.

Argatroban Use in Pediatric Patients Supported by Paracorporeal Ventricular Assist Devices

Direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI) use has been associated with decreased stroke and death rates in children on ventricular assist devices (VADs). Most information about DTI use for children on VADs has focused on bivalirudin with limited data on argatroban. We hypothesized that, compared to unfractionated heparin (UFH), argatroban would be associated with decreased bleeding, stroke, and death rates in children on VADs. We retrospectively collected data from patients <18 years old on paracorporeal VADs at Children's Wisconsin between January 1, 2010 and July 1, 2021. We divided patients into cohorts based on anticoagulation strategy with heparin or argatroban. Definitions of bleeding and neurologic events were the same as in other published reports on this population. We compared categorical variables with the χ 2 or Fisher's exact test, and continuous variables with the Mann-Whitney U test. Nineteen children were anticoagulated with argatroban, and 16 with heparin. Demographics between groups were not significantly different. Stroke, bleeding, and death rates did not differ between patients treated with UFH versus argatroban. The study population was complex with a high rate of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use before VAD support, which likely impacted our findings. Our study does not support argatroban as a superior alternative anticoagulant compared to UFH in children requiring VADs.

Different Types of Vasculitis Complicated by Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia-Analysis of Four Cases and Literature Review

Vasculitis and HIT have different etiologies, although both involve autoimmune mechanisms. Treatment of vasculitis often requires the use of an anticoagulant such as heparin, which can lead to the development of HIT and subsequent life-threatening complications. The analysis covered patients hospitalized in the Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Dialysis in the period from September 2020 to March 2023. After analyzing the data, we selected four patients in whom vasculitis treatment was complicated by HIT. These included two patients with ANCA vasculitis and two patients with anti-GBM disease. We also described similar cases reported in the literature.

Membrane oxygenator longevity was higher in argatroban-treated patients undergoing vvECMO

BACKGROUND

In severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) can be a lifesaver. However, anticoagulation therapy is mandatory because the nonendothelial extracorporeal surface increases the risk of thromboembolic problems. Heparin is still the most common anticoagulant, but argatroban could be an alternative. This work investigates whether argatroban offers a therapeutic advantage over heparin during vvECMO.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent vvECMO for severe ARDS and received heparin or argatroban as anticoagulation therapy. Demographic variables, intensive care unit (ICU) treatment and outcome parameters were evaluated. The primary outcome parameter was the operating time of the membrane oxygenator normalized to the duration of vvECMO treatment. Secondary outcome parameters were transfusion requirements normalized to the duration of vvECMO therapy.

RESULTS

Fifty seven patients from January 2019 to February 2021 underwent vvECMO and were included in this study. Thirty three patients received heparin and 24 patients argatroban as anticoagulatory therapy. The groups did not differ in demographics, ICU scoring systems, or comorbidities. Platelet counts and partial prothrombin time did not differ between the two groups during the first 6 days of vvECMO. The argatroban group had lower requirements for red blood cells, platelets and fresh frozen plasma. The mean runtime of the individual membrane oxygenator increased from 12.3 days (heparin group) to 16.6 days in the argatroban group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that argatroban can be considered as anticoagulant during vvECMO.

Thromboprophylaxis with argatroban in critically ill patients with sepsis: a review

During sepsis, an initial prothrombotic shift takes place, in which coagulatory acute-phase proteins are increased, while anticoagulatory factors and platelet count decrease. Further on, the fibrinolytic system becomes impaired, which contributes to disease severity. At a later stage in sepsis, coagulation factors may become depleted, and sepsis patients may shift into a hypo-coagulable state with an increased bleeding risk. During the pro-coagulatory shift, critically ill patients have an increased thrombosis risk that ranges from developing micro-thromboses that impair organ function to life-threatening thromboembolic events. Here, thrombin plays a key role in coagulation as well as in inflammation. For thromboprophylaxis, low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) and unfractionated heparins (UFHs) are recommended. Nevertheless, there are conditions such as heparin resistance or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), wherein heparin becomes ineffective or even puts the patient at an increased prothrombotic risk. In these cases, argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI), might be a potential alternative anticoagulatory strategy. Yet, caution is advised with regard to dosing of argatroban especially in sepsis. Therefore, the starting dose of argatroban is recommended to be low and should be titrated to the targeted anticoagulation level and be closely monitored in the further course of treatment. The authors of this review recommend using DTIs such as argatroban as an alternative anticoagulant in critically ill patients suffering from sepsis or COVID-19 with suspected or confirmed HIT, HIT-like conditions, impaired fibrinolysis, in patients on extracorporeal circuits and patients with heparin resistance, when closely monitored.

From ancient leech to direct thrombin inhibitors and beyond: New from old

Medicinal leeches have been used in health care since before written history, with widely varying popularity over the centuries. Nowadays, medicinal leech therapy is mainly used in plastic and reconstructive microsurgery, with new interesting potential therapeutic applications in many other diseases. The leech's best-known salivary product, hirudin - one of the most powerful natural anticoagulants - was the only remedy to prevent blood clotting until the discovery of heparin. Starting from hirudin, pharmacological research succeeded in developing new anticoagulants, which represent a cornerstone of prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. While we are perhaps on the threshold of a new era of anticoagulation, with the development of FXI and XII inhibitors and direct reversible covalent thrombin inhibitors, which promise to achieve effective anticoagulation without bleeding risk. This review retraces the intriguing journey of these drugs in cardiovascular disease, highlighting the fil rouge that links the ancient leech to the current and oncoming antithrombotic therapy. We think that knowledge of the past is key to understanding and appreciating the present and to seize future opportunities.

[The role of thrombin in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and its complications]

Thrombin is a key regulator of the homeostasis system. Also, it actively participates in progression of various systemic diseases, including atherosclerosis. There is a large amount of experimental and clinical data on the involvement of thrombin in the pathogenesis of ischemic heart disease (IHD). Thus, studying thrombin activity regulation is promising. Also, the question whether it is possible to use biomarkers of thrombin activity as predictors of cardiovascular complications in IHD patients is relevant. The present review focuses on major mechanisms of thrombin functioning, its role in development and progression of atherosclerosis, and available tests for evaluation of thrombin functional activity. Major clinical studies are discussed that evaluated the efficacy of thrombin inhibitors and protease-activated receptor antagonists.

Widespread Arterial Thrombosis after ChAdOx1 nCov-19 Vaccination

Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia is an uncommon complication of COVID-19 vaccines using adenovirus mRNA carriers and has been associated with thrombosis of the cerebral venous sinuses and portal system. We report a case of a 69-year-old woman admitted to the intensive care unit due to stroke caused by thrombosis of the right carotid artery 9 days after receiving the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine. Further investigations demonstrated multiple thrombi in the arterial tree in the absence of any venous involvement. The clinical course and the treatment are described and discussed.

Platelet Activation Mechanisms and Consequences of Immune Thrombocytopenia

Autoimmune disorders are often associated with low platelet count or thrombocytopenia. In immune-induced thrombocytopenia (IIT), a common mechanism is increased platelet activity, which can have an increased risk of thrombosis. In addition, or alternatively, auto-antibodies suppress platelet formation or augment platelet clearance. Effects of the auto-antibodies are linked to the unique structural and functional characteristics of platelets. Conversely, prior platelet activation may contribute to the innate and adaptive immune responses. Extensive interplay between platelets, coagulation and complement activation processes may aggravate the pathology. Here, we present an overview of the reported molecular causes and consequences of IIT in the most common forms of autoimmune disorders. These include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), drug-induced thrombocytopenia (DITP), heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), COVID-19 vaccine-induced thrombosis with thrombocytopenia (VITT), thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura (TTP), and hemolysis, the elevated liver enzymes and low platelet (HELLP) syndrome. We focus on the platelet receptors that bind auto-antibodies, the immune complexes, damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and complement factors. In addition, we review how circulating platelets serve as a reservoir of immunomodulatory molecules. By this update on the molecular mechanisms and the roles of platelets in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, we highlight platelet-based pathways that can predispose for thrombocytopenia and are linked thrombotic or bleeding events.

GFHT Proposals On The Practical Use Of Argatroban - With Specifics Regarding Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopaenia (VITT)

Argatroban is a direct anti-IIa (thrombin) anticoagulant, administered as a continuous intravenous infusion; it has been approved in many countries for the anticoagulant management of heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia (HIT). Argatroban was recently proposed as the non-heparin anticoagulant of choice for the management of patients diagnosed with Vaccine-induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopaenia (VITT). Immunoglobulins are also promptly intravenously administered in order to rapidly improve platelet count; concomitant therapy with steroids is also often considered. An ad hoc committee of the French Working Group on Haemostasis and Thrombosis members has worked on updated and detailed proposals regarding the management of anticoagulation with argatroban, based on previously released guidance for HIT, and adapted for VITT. In case of VITT, the initial dose to be preferred is 1.0 µg x kg^-1 x min^-1, with further dose-adjustments based on iterative and frequent clinical and laboratory assessments. It is strongly advised to involve a health practitioner experienced in the management of difficult cases in haemostasis. The first laboratory assessment should be performed 4 hours after the initiation of argatroban infusion, with further controls at 2-4-hour intervals until steady state, and at least once daily thereafter. Importantly, full anticoagulation should be rapidly achieved in case of widespread thrombosis. Cerebral vein thrombosis (which is typical of VITT) should not call for an overly cautious anticoagulation scheme. Argatroban administration requires baseline laboratory assessment and should rely on an anti-IIa assay to derive argatroban plasma levels using a dedicated calibration, with a target range between 0.5 and 1.5 µg/mL. Target argatroban plasma levels can be refined based on meticulous appraisal of risk factors for bleeding and thrombosis, on frequent reassessments of clinical status with appropriate vascular imaging, and on the changes in daily platelet counts. Regarding the use of aPTT, baseline value and possible causes for alterations of the clotting time must be taken into account. Specifically, in case of VITT, an aPTT ratio (patient's / mean normal clotting time) between 1.5 and 2.5 is suggested, to be refined according to the sensitivity of the reagent to the effect of a direct thrombin inhibitor. The sole use of aPTT is discouraged: one has to resort to a periodical check with an anti-IIa assay at least, with the help of a specialised laboratory if necessary. Dose modifications should proceed in a stepwise manner with 0.1 to 0.2 µg x kg^-1 x min^-1 up- or downward changes, taking into account the initial dose, laboratory results, and the whole individual setting. Nomograms are available to adjust the infusion rate. Haemoglobin level, platelet count, fibrinogen plasma level and liver tests should be periodically checked, depending on the clinical status, the more so when unstable.

Diagnostic and treatment recommendations from the FACME ad-hoc expert working group on the management of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis associated with COVID-19 vaccination

INTRODUCTION

Cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis have been reported in individuals vaccinated against COVID-19 with non-replicating adenoviral vector vaccines. We issue our recommendations on the diagnosis and management of patients presenting this complication.

METHODS

The multidisciplinary working group, led by the Spanish Federation of Medical and Scientific Associations (FACME) and including representatives of several scientific societies, reviewed the available evidence from the literature and reports of the European Medicines Agency. We establish a definition for suspected cases and issue diagnostic and treatment recommendations regarding vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopaenia.

RESULTS

We define suspected cases as those cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis occurring between 3 and 21 days after the administration of non-replicating adenoviral vector vaccines, in patients with a platelet count below 150 000/μL or presenting a decrease of 50% with respect to the previous value. Findings suggestive of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopaenia include the presence of antibodies to platelet factor 4, D-dimer levels 4 times greater than the upper limit of normal, and unexplained thrombosis. The recommended treatment includes intravenous administration of non-specific human immunoglobulin or alternatively plasmapheresis, avoiding the use of heparin, instead employing argatroban, bivalirudin, fondaparinux, rivaroxaban, or apixaban for anticoagulation, and avoiding platelet transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-replicating adenoviral vector vaccines may be associated with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis with thrombocytopaenia; it is important to treat the dysimmune phenomenon and the cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.

Diagnostic and treatment recommendations from the FACME ad-hoc expert working group on the management of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis associated with COVID-19 vaccination

Introducción

Se han reportado casos de trombosis venosas cerebrales en personas vacunadas frente a COVID-19 con vacunas vectorizadas con adenovirus no replicantes. Aportamos recomendaciones sobre el diagnóstico y manejo de pacientes con esta complicación.

Método

El grupo de trabajo multidisciplinar, liderado por la Federación de Asociaciones Científico Médicas Españolas y representado por distintas sociedades científicas, revisó la evidencia disponible publicada en la literatura y en los informes de la Agencia Europea de Medicamentos. Se estableció una definición de caso sospechoso y recomendaciones diagnóstico-terapéuticas de la trombocitopenia trombótica inducida por la vacunación.

Resultados

Se considera caso sospechoso aquella trombosis venosa cerebral ocurrida entre 3 y 21 días tras la administración de vacunas no replicantes de adenovirus que presenten un valor de plaquetas inferior a 150.000 plaquetas por μL o un descenso del 50% respecto de la cifra previa. Los datos indicativos de trombocitopenia trombótica inducida por la vacunación incluyen la presencia de anticuerpos antifactor plaquetario tipo 4, la elevación de dímero-D 4 veces por encima del límite superior de la normalidad o la ausencia de justificación de la trombosis. En su tratamiento, se recomienda administrar inmunoglobulina humana inespecífica intravenosa o realizar plasmaféresis en su defecto, evitar el uso de heparina, empleando como anticoagulantes argatroban, bivalirudina, fondaparinux, rivaroxabán o apixabán, y evitar la transfusión de plaquetas.

Conclusiones

Las vacunas de vectores no replicantes de adenovirus pueden asociarse a trombosis venosas cerebrales con trombocitopenia, en cuyo manejo es importante el tratamiento del fenómeno disinmune y de la trombosis venosa cerebral.