1
|
Madariaga A, Sánchez-Bayona R, Kasherman L, Estrada-Lorenzo JM, Manso L, Tolosa P, Alva M, Lema L, González-Deza C, Ciruelos E, Valcarcel D, Lheureux S, Oza AM. Proactive assessment of patient reported outcomes in ovarian cancer studies: a systematic review and call for action in future studies. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024:ijgc-2024-005883. [PMID: 39379328 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to evaluate the proactive or real-time assessment of patient reported outcomes in studies involving patients with ovarian cancer undergoing systemic therapy. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched (from database inception until February 2022), and prospective ovarian cancer studies (experimental or observational) that incorporated patient reported outcomes, including quality of life, were included. The primary objective was to assess the ratio of studies incorporating real-time use of patient reported outcomes among those studies performing patient reported outcomes. A secondary objective was to describe the patient reported outcome reporting. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist was followed. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS 3071 articles were screened, with 117 included in the final analysis. Studies were published between 1990 and 2022, and consisted of 35 735 patients (median 140 patients per study; interquartile range 58-415). Median time from patient enrollment initiation to study publication was 7 years (range 1-15). Most studies were experimental/clinical trials (n=93, 79%) followed by observational (n=23, 20%). Therapeutic strategies were assessed in 98% (91/93) of experimental studies, most frequently chemotherapy (n=53, 58%), followed by antiangiogenics or poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (n=8, 9%, each). Patient reported outcomes were the primary endpoint in 7.5% (7/93) and 83% (19/23) of experimental and observational studies, respectively. The ratio of real-time patient reported outcomes assessment/evaluation was 0.9% (1/117). CONCLUSIONS Completion of patient reported outcome questionnaires involves time and effort for patients with ovarian cancer. Responses to these questionnaires were only assessed in real time in <1% of analyzed studies. Efforts should be made to incorporate proactive assessment of patient reported outcomes to optimize patient care and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ainhoa Madariaga
- Medical Oncology, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Lawrence Kasherman
- Medical Oncology, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Luis Manso
- Medical Oncology, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Tolosa
- Medical Oncology, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel Alva
- Medical Oncology, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Lema
- Medical Oncology, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Eva Ciruelos
- 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Valcarcel
- Hematology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stephanie Lheureux
- Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amit M Oza
- Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rothmund M, Pilz MJ, Schlosser L, Arraras JI, Groenvold M, Holzner B, van Leeuwen M, Petersen MA, Schmidt H, Young T, Rose M, Cella D, Giesinger JM. Equipercentile equating of scores from common patient-reported outcome measures of physical function in patients with cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 2024; 165:111203. [PMID: 37918641 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide equipercentile equating of physical function (PF) scores from frequently used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cancer patients to facilitate data pooling and comparisons. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Adult cancer patients from five European countries completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) computer adaptive test (CAT) Core, EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Version 3.0 (QLQ-C30), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G), 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function 20a short form. The R package "equate" was used to establish conversion tables of PF scores on those measures with a bivariate rank correlation of at least 0.75. RESULTS In total, 953 patients with cancer (mean age 58.9 years, 54.7% men) participated. Bivariate rank correlations between PF scores from the EORTC CAT Core, EORTC QLQ-C30, SF-36, and PROMIS were all above 0.85, but below 0.69 for the FACT-G. Conversion tables were established for all measures but the FACT-G. These tables indicate which score from one PROM best matches the score from another PROM and provide standard errors of converted scores. CONCLUSION Our analysis indicates that linking of PF scores from both EORTC measures (CAT and QLQ-C30) with PROMIS and SF-36 is possible, whereas the physical domain of the FACT-G seems to be different. The established conversion tables may be used for comparing results or pooling data from clinical studies using different PROMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Rothmund
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, University Clinic of Psychiatry II, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstraße 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria; Institute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Micha J Pilz
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, University Clinic of Psychiatry II, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstraße 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Lisa Schlosser
- Data Lab Hell GmbH, Europastraße 2a, A-6170 Zirl, Austria
| | - Juan I Arraras
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, C/Irunlarrea 3, ES-31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Mogens Groenvold
- Palliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg bakke 23B, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Oester Farimagsgade 5, DK-1353 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, University Clinic of Psychiatry I, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstraße 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Marieke van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Morten Aa Petersen
- Palliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg bakke 23B, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Heike Schmidt
- University Clinic and Outpatient Clinic for Radiotherapy and Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Teresa Young
- Supportive Oncology Research Team, East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust incorporating Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN, United Kingdom
| | - Matthias Rose
- Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (CPCOR), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Johannes M Giesinger
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, University Clinic of Psychiatry II, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstraße 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liang M, Ye Z. Patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care: Integration with computerized adaptive testing. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2023; 10:100323. [PMID: 38033390 PMCID: PMC10686812 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Minyu Liang
- School of Nursing, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zengjie Ye
- School of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rogge AA, Petersen MA, Aaronson NK, Conroy T, Dirven L, Fischer F, Habets E, Reijneveld JC, Rose M, Sleurs C, Taphoorn M, Tomaszewski KA, Vachon H, Young T, Groenvold M. Development and psychometric evaluation of item banks for memory and attention - supplements to the EORTC CAT Core instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2023; 21:124. [PMID: 37968682 PMCID: PMC10647100 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-023-02199-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer patients may experience a decrease in cognitive functioning before, during and after cancer treatment. So far, the Quality of Life Group of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLG) developed an item bank to assess self-reported memory and attention within a single, cognitive functioning scale (CF) using computerized adaptive testing (EORTC CAT Core CF item bank). However, the distinction between different cognitive functions might be important to assess the patients' functional status appropriately and to determine treatment impact. To allow for such assessment, the aim of this study was to develop and psychometrically evaluate separate item banks for memory and attention based on the EORTC CAT Core CF item bank. METHODS In a multistep process including an expert-based content analysis, we assigned 44 items from the EORTC CAT Core CF item bank to the memory or attention domain. Then, we conducted psychometric analyses based on a sample used within the development of the EORTC CAT Core CF item bank. The sample consisted of 1030 cancer patients from Denmark, France, Poland, and the United Kingdom. We evaluated measurement properties of the newly developed item banks using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response theory model calibration. RESULTS Item assignment resulted in 31 memory and 13 attention items. Conducted CFAs suggested good fit to a 1-factor model for each domain and no violations of monotonicity or indications of differential item functioning. Evaluation of CATs for both memory and attention confirmed well-functioning item banks with increased power/reduced sample size requirements (for CATs ≥ 4 items and up to 40% reduction in sample size requirements in comparison to non-CAT format). CONCLUSION Two well-functioning and psychometrically robust item banks for memory and attention were formed from the existing EORTC CAT Core CF item bank. These findings could support further research on self-reported cognitive functioning in cancer patients in clinical trials as well as for real-word-evidence. A more precise assessment of attention and memory deficits in cancer patients will strengthen the evidence on the effects of cancer treatment for different cancer entities, and therefore contribute to shared and informed clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A A Rogge
- Charité Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
- CPCOR - Charité Center for patient-centered Outcomes Research, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - M A Petersen
- Palliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg bakke 23B, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2400.
| | - N K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T Conroy
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès- Nancy, F-54519, France
- Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, équipe MICS, Nancy, F-54000, France
| | - L Dirven
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, PO Box 432, The Hague, 2501 CK, The Netherlands
| | - F Fischer
- Charité Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- CPCOR - Charité Center for patient-centered Outcomes Research, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ejj Habets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Haaglanden Medical Center, PO Box 432, The Hague, 2501 CK, The Netherlands
| | - J C Reijneveld
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, location VUmc of Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede, the Netherlands
| | - M Rose
- Charité Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- CPCOR - Charité Center for patient-centered Outcomes Research, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - C Sleurs
- Department of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Taphoorn
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, PO Box 432, The Hague, 2501 CK, The Netherlands
| | - K A Tomaszewski
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Kraḱów University, Kraków, Poland
| | - H Vachon
- Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Young
- Supportive Oncology Research Team, East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust including Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - M Groenvold
- Palliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg bakke 23B, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2400
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sweegers MG, Depenbusch J, Kampshoff CS, Aaronson NK, Hiensch A, Wengström Y, Backman M, Gunasekara N, Clauss D, Pelaez M, Lachowicz M, May AM, Steindorf K, Stuiver MM. Perspectives of patients with metastatic breast cancer on physical exercise programs: results from a survey in five European countries. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:694. [PMID: 37955790 PMCID: PMC10643348 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08124-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To successfully implement exercise programs for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), services and patient education should consider patients' knowledge, preferences, values, and goals. Hence, gaining insight into their perspectives on exercise and exercise programming is important. METHOD In this cross-sectional survey, we recruited patients with MBC from the Netherlands, Germany, Poland, Spain, and Sweden. We collected data on patients' knowledge and skills about exercise and outcome expectations. We identified barriers to and facilitators of participation in exercise programs, and patients' preferences for program content and modes of exercise delivery. RESULTS A total of 420 patients participated in the survey. Respondents were, on average, 56.5 years old (SD 10.8) and 70% had bone metastases. Sixty-eight percent reported sufficient skills to engage in aerobic exercise, but only 35% did so for resistance exercise. Respondents expected exercise to have multiple physical benefits, but a few patients expected exercise to worsen their pain (5%). Not having access to an exercise program for cancer patients (27%), feeling too tired (23%), and/or weak (23%) were the most often reported barriers. Facilitators for exercising regularly were previous positive physical (72%) and emotional (68%) experiences with exercising, and receiving personalized advice from a physiotherapist or sport/fitness instructor (62%). Patients were most interested in walking and preferred exercising at a public gym, although there were differences by country. Fifty-seven percent did not know whether their insurance company reimburses exercise programs and only 9% would be willing to pay more than €50 per month to participate. CONCLUSION A large percentage of patients with MBC lack the skills to engage in regular exercise as recommended by exercise guidelines for people with cancer. Patients may benefit from personalized advice and appropriate training facilities to overcome barriers. When implementing exercise interventions, attention should be given to reimbursement and the relatively low willingness-to-pay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maike G Sweegers
- Center for Quality of Life, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna Depenbusch
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Caroline S Kampshoff
- Center for Quality of Life, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk Hiensch
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Wengström
- Division of Nursing, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institute, and Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Malin Backman
- Division of Nursing, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Karolinska Institute, and Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nadira Gunasekara
- Department for Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dorothea Clauss
- Department for Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Mireia Pelaez
- R&D department, Fundación Onkologikoa, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain and Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Europea del Atlántico, Santander, Spain
| | - Milena Lachowicz
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Anne M May
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Karen Steindorf
- Division of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martijn M Stuiver
- Center for Quality of Life, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Weemaes ATR, Meijer R, Beelen M, van Hooff M, Weijenberg MP, Lenssen AF, van de Poll-Franse LV, Savelberg HHCM, Schep G. Monitoring aerobic capacity in cancer survivors using self-reported questionnaires: criterion validity and responsiveness. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023; 7:73. [PMID: 37466784 PMCID: PMC10356721 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00613-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evaluating the criterion validity and responsiveness of the self-reported FitMáx©-questionnaire, Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and Veterans Specific Activity Questionnaire (VSAQ) to monitor aerobic capacity in cancer survivors. METHODS Cancer survivors participating in a 10-week supervised exercise program were included. The FitMáx©-questionnaire, DASI, VSAQ and a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) were completed before (T0) and after (T1) the program. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated between VO2peak estimated by the questionnaires (questionnaire-VO2peak) and VO2peak measured during CPET (CPET-VO2peak), at T0 to examine criterion validity, and between changes in questionnaire-VO2peak and CPET-VO2peak (ΔT0-T1) to determine responsiveness. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to examine the ability of the questionnaires to detect true improvements (≥ 6%) in CPET-VO2peak. RESULTS Seventy participants were included. Outcomes at T1 were available for 58 participants (83%). Mean CPET-VO2peak significantly improved at T1 (Δ1.6 mL·kg- 1·min- 1 or 8%). Agreement between questionnaire-VO2peak and CPET-VO2peak at T0 was moderate for the FitMáx©-questionnaire (ICC = 0.69) and VSAQ (ICC = 0.53), and poor for DASI (ICC = 0.36). Poor agreement was found between ΔCPET-VO2peak and Δquestionnaire-VO2peak for all questionnaires (ICC 0.43, 0.19 and 0.18 for the FitMáx©-questionnaire, VSAQ and DASI, respectively). ROC analysis showed that the FitMáx©-questionnaire was able to detect improvements in CPET-VO2peak (area under the curve, AUC = 0.77), when using a cut-off value of 1.0 mL·kg- 1·min- 1, while VSAQ (AUC = 0.66) and DASI (AUC = 0.64) could not. CONCLUSION The self-reported FitMáx©-questionnaire has sufficient validity to estimate aerobic capacity in cancer survivors at group level. The responsiveness of the FitMáx©-questionnaire for absolute change is limited, but the questionnaire is able to detect whether aerobic capacity improved. The FitMáx©-questionnaire showed substantial better values of validity and responsiveness compared to DASI and VSAQ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk T R Weemaes
- Department of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, Maastricht, AZ, 6202, The Netherlands.
- Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Renske Meijer
- Department of Sports and Exercise, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Milou Beelen
- Department of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, Maastricht, AZ, 6202, The Netherlands
- Department of Human Biology, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn van Hooff
- Department of Sports and Exercise, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
- Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Matty P Weijenberg
- Department of Epidemiology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Antoine F Lenssen
- Department of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 5800, Maastricht, AZ, 6202, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Hans H C M Savelberg
- Department of Nutrition and Movement Sciences, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Goof Schep
- Department of Sports and Exercise, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schurr T, Loth F, Lidington E, Piccinin C, Arraras JI, Groenvold M, Holzner B, van Leeuwen M, Petersen MA, Schmidt H, Young T, Giesinger JM. Patient-reported outcome measures for physical function in cancer patients: content comparison of the EORTC CAT Core, EORTC QLQ-C30, SF-36, FACT-G, and PROMIS measures using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. BMC Med Res Methodol 2023; 23:21. [PMID: 36681808 PMCID: PMC9862545 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01826-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported physical function (PF) is a key endpoint in cancer clinical trials. Using complex statistical methods, common metrics have been developed to compare scores from different patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures, but such methods do not account for possible differences in questionnaire content. Therefore, the aim of our study was a content comparison of frequently used PRO measures for PF in cancer patients. METHODS Relying on the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) we categorized the item content of the physical domains of the following measures: EORTC CAT Core, EORTC QLQ-C30, SF-36, PROMIS Cancer Item Bank for Physical Function, PROMIS Short Form for Physical Function 20a, and the FACT-G. Item content was linked to ICF categories by two independent reviewers. RESULTS The 118 items investigated were assigned to 3 components ('d - Activities and Participation', 'b - Body Functions', and 'e - Environmental Factors') and 11 first-level ICF categories. All PF items of the EORTC measures but one were assigned to the first-level ICF categories 'd4 - Mobility' and 'd5 - Self-care', all within the component 'd - Activities and Participation'. The SF-36 additionally included item content related to 'd9 - Community, social and civic life' and the PROMIS Short Form for Physical Function 20a also included content related to 'd6 - domestic life'. The PROMIS Cancer Item Bank (v1.1) covered, in addition, two first-level categories within the component 'b - Body Functions'. The FACT-G Physical Well-being scale was found to be the most diverse scale with item content partly not covered by the ICF framework. DISCUSSION Our results provide information about conceptual differences between common PRO measures for the assessment of PF in cancer patients. Our results complement quantitative information on psychometric characteristics of these measures and provide a better understanding of the possibilities of establishing common metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Schurr
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, University Hospital of Psychiatry I, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstraße 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - F Loth
- Professorship for Psychological Diagnostics and Intervention Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy and Education, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Ostenstraße 25, 85072 Eichstätt, Germany
| | - E Lidington
- Cancer Behavioural Science Unit, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, St Thomas Street, London, SE1 9RT UK
| | - C Piccinin
- Quality of Life Department, EORTC, Avenue E. Mounier, 83/11, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - JI Arraras
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, C/Irunlarrea 3, S31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - M Groenvold
- Palliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - B Holzner
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstraße 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - M van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - MA Petersen
- Palliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg & Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - H Schmidt
- University Clinic and Outpatient Clinic for Radiotherapy and Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty of Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - T Young
- Lynda Jackson Macmillan Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Rickmansworth Rd, GB- HA6 2RN Halle (Saale), UK
| | - JM Giesinger
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstraße 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Development of an EORTC Item Bank for Computer-Adaptive Testing of Nausea and Vomiting. Semin Oncol Nurs 2022; 38:151341. [PMID: 36280540 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2022.151341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Nausea and vomiting (NV) remain common cancer symptoms and frequent side effects of anticancer therapies despite available antiemetics. They can lead to treatment disruption and discontinuation. NV is an important patient reported outcome in oncology. This study aimed to build an item bank for computer-adaptive testing (CAT) based on NV questions in the European Organisation for Research for Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life for Cancer Patients (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire and complete the first three phases of development as described in the EORTC Quality of Life Group guidelines. DATA SOURCES The development followed a standard procedure. The three phases include conceptualization and literature search (phase 1); item classification, selection, formulation and rating, and expert evaluations (phase 2); and patient pretesting (phase 3). The literature search resulted in a preliminary list of 115 items. Following classification, formulation, and rating, 21 candidate items adhered to the QLQ-C30 format. Evaluation by experts (n = 11) from five countries and patients (n = 31) pretesting in Denmark, Poland, and the UK lead to a final list of 20 items. CONCLUSION The selection, development, and refining of NV items have been described. The nature of this testing ensures an initial CAT item bank that after field testing (phase 4) and psychometric analysis is expected to provide a precise and efficient NV measurement while still being comparable to the original QLQ-C30 scale. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Access to reliable tools that facilitate NV comprehensive assessment is an important issue for nurses caring for patients with cancer. This CAT item bank is meant to support clinical decisions when all phases of testing are completed.
Collapse
|
9
|
Vachon H, Petersen MA, Pe M, Reijneveld JC, Groenvold M. Another look at floor and ceiling effects in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning subscale and possible solutions. Cancer 2022; 128:2384-2385. [PMID: 35389506 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo Vachon
- Quality of Life Department, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Morten A Petersen
- Palliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Madeline Pe
- Quality of Life Department, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jaap C Reijneveld
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Center Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mogens Groenvold
- Palliative Care Research Unit, Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine GP, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brazilian Validation of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group (QLG) Computerised Adaptive Tests (CAT) Core. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:3373-3383. [PMID: 34590597 PMCID: PMC8482129 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to validate the Brazilian version of EORTC CAT Core and compare the Brazilian results with those from the original European EORTC CAT Core validation study. Methods: After validated translation, 168 cancer patients from Brazil receiving radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy was assessed. Translated EORTC CAT Core and all QLQ-C30 items were administered to patients using CHES (Computer-Based Health Evaluation System) before (T0) and after (T1) treatment initiation. The association between QLQ-C30 and CAT scores and ceiling/floor effects were estimated. Based on estimates of relative validity (cross-sectional, known-group differences and changes over time), relative sample-size requirements for CAT compared to QLQ-C30 were estimated. Results: Correlation coefficients between CAT and QLQ-C30 domains ranged from 0.63 to 0.93; except for dyspnoea, all coefficients were >0.82 (corresponding figures were 0.81–0.93 in the European study). On average across domains, floor/ceiling was reduced by 10% using CAT (9% in the European study) corresponding to a relative reduction of 32% (37% in the European study). Analyses of known-group validity and responsiveness indicated that, on average across domains, the sample-size requirements may be reduced by 17% using CAT rather than QLQ-C30, without loss of power (28% in the European study). The Brazilian sample had less symptom/quality of life impairment than the European sample, which likely explains the lower sample-size reduction using CAT when comparing with the European sample. Conclusions: The results in the Brazilian cohort were generally similar to those from the European sample and confirm the validity and usefulness of the EORTC CAT Core.
Collapse
|
11
|
Colomer-Lahiguera S, Bryant-Lukosius D, Rietkoetter S, Martelli L, Ribi K, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Sherifali D, Orcurto A, Juergens R, Eicher M. Patient-reported outcome instruments used in immune-checkpoint inhibitor clinical trials in oncology: a systematic review. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2020; 4:58. [PMID: 32676785 PMCID: PMC7364679 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-020-00210-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Context Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have shown significant benefits for overall survival across various cancer types. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are assessed in clinical trials as a measure of efficacy. However, it remains unclear to what extent current PRO instruments capture symptoms specific to ICI toxicities. We conducted a systematic review to identify the use and content validity of PRO instruments in ICI clinical trials in oncology. Methods Literature was retrieved from PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Medline and CINAHL databases. Articles presenting ICI clinical trials’ PRO results, clinical trial study protocols, and conference abstracts stating the use of PRO measures were assessed. We evaluated the validity of identified instruments by comparing their symptom-related content with the adverse events reported in each ICI clinical trial. Results From database inception until January 2020, we identified 191 ICI clinical trials stating the use of PRO measures of which 26 published PRO results. The cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30 and the generic EQ-5D questionnaires were the most widely used instruments, often in combination with disease-specific PROs. Instruments used to report PRO symptom-related toxicities covered 45% of the most frequently reported AEs, whereas 23% of AEs were partially covered and 29% were not covered at all. Of non-covered AEs, 59% referred to the dermatologic system. Partially covered AEs related to endocrine and specific types of pain. Conclusion Despite the high frequency of symptom-related toxicities related to ICI, these events are only partially covered (or not addressed) by current PRO instruments, even when combined. Further research is needed to develop new strategies to tailor PRO instruments to specific ICI toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Colomer-Lahiguera
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. .,Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Denise Bryant-Lukosius
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Oncology, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah Rietkoetter
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Lorraine Martelli
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada
| | - Karin Ribi
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG), Coordinating Center, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis
- McMaster Evidence and Review Synthesis Team, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Diana Sherifali
- Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster Evidence and Review Synthesis Team, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Angela Orcurto
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Rosalyn Juergens
- Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Department of Oncology, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Manuela Eicher
- Institute of Higher Education and Research in Healthcare (IUFRS), Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Koller M, Shamieh O, Hjermstad MJ, Hornslien K, Young T, Chalk T, Ioannidis G, Harle A, Johnson CD, Tomaszewski KA, Serpentini S, Pinto M, van der Weijst L, Janssens A, Morag O, Chie WC, Arraras JI, Pompili C, Jungraithmayr W, Hechtner M, Katsochi D, Müller K, Gräfenstein L, Schulz C, Bottomley A. Psychometric properties of the updated EORTC module for assessing quality of life in patients with lung cancer (QLQ-LC29): an international, observational field study. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:723-732. [PMID: 32213338 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30093-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Revised: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ-LC13) assesses quality of life (QOL) in patients with lung cancer and was the first EORTC module developed for use in international clinical trials. Since its publication in 1994, major treatment advances with possible effects on QOL have occurred. These changes called for an update of the module and its international psychometric validation. We aimed to investigate the scale structure and psychometric properties of the updated lung cancer module, QLQ-LC29, in patients with lung cancer. METHODS This international, observational field study was done in 19 hospitals across 12 countries. Patients aged older than 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of lung cancer and no other previous primary tumour, and who were mentally fit with sufficient language skills to understand and complete the questionnaire were included. Patients were asked during a hospital visit to fill in the paper versions of the core questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 plus QLQ-LC29, and investigators selected half of these patients to complete the questionnaire again 2-4 weeks later. Our primary aim was to assess the scale structure and psychometric properties of EORTC QLQ-LC29. We analysed scale structure using confirmatory factor analysis; reliability using Cronbach's α value (internal consistency) and intra-class coefficient (test-retest reliability); sensitivity using independent t tests stratified by Karnofsky performance status; and responsiveness to change over time by ANOVA. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02745691. FINDINGS Between April 12, 2016, and Sept 26, 2018, 523 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of either non-small-cell lung cancer (n=442) or small-cell lung cancer (n=81) were recruited. Confirmatory factor analysis provided a solution composed of five multi-item scales (coughing, shortness of breath, fear of progression, hair problems, and surgery-related symptoms) plus 15 single symptom or side-effect items: χ2=370·233, root mean square error of approximation=0·075, and comparative-fit index=0·901. Cronbach's α for internal consistencies of all multi-item scales were above the threshold of 0·70. Intra-class coefficients for test-retest reliabilities ranged between 0·82 and 0·97. Three (shortness of breath, fear of progression, and hair problems) of the five multi-item scales showed responsiveness to change over time (p values <0·05), as did nine of 15 single symptom items. Four (coughing, shortness of breath, fear of progression, and surgery-related symptoms) of the five multi-item scales and ten of the 15 single symptom items were sensitive to known group differences (ie, lower vs higher Karnofsky performance status). INTERPRETATION Results determined the psychometric properties of the updated lung cancer module, which is ready for use in international clinical studies. FUNDING EORTC Quality of Life Group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Koller
- Center for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
| | - Omar Shamieh
- Department of Palliative Care, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Marianne J Hjermstad
- Regional Advisory Unit for Palliative Care and European Palliative Care Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Teresa Young
- East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, UK
| | - Tara Chalk
- East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Krzysztof A Tomaszewski
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Samantha Serpentini
- Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS Comprehensive Cancer Center, Padova, Italy
| | - Monica Pinto
- Rehabilitation Medicine Unit, Department of Supportive Care, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS- Fondazione G Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Annelies Janssens
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Ofir Morag
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Wei-Chu Chie
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine and Department of Public Health, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Juan I Arraras
- Oncology Departments, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Cecilia Pompili
- Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Marlene Hechtner
- University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Despina Katsochi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Karolina Müller
- Center for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Laura Gräfenstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christian Schulz
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Andrew Bottomley
- Quality of Life Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
International validation of the EORTC CAT Core: a new adaptive instrument for measuring core quality of life domains in cancer. Qual Life Res 2020; 29:1405-1417. [PMID: 31955374 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02421-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group (QLG) has developed computerised adaptive tests (CATs) for the 14 functional and symptom domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire. This is expected to optimise measurement precision, relevance to patients and flexibility. Here, we present the first international validation of the EORTC CAT Core. METHODS A heterogeneous sample of 699 cancer patients scheduled for chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy was recruited across seven European countries. The EORTC CAT Core and all QLQ-C30 items were administered to participants before and after initiating treatment. Correlations between CAT and QLQ-C30 scores and floor/ceiling effects were calculated. Using several grouping variables, relative validity (cross-sectional known groups difference), responsiveness (changes over time) and relative sample size requirements of the CAT compared to the QLQ-C30 were estimated. RESULTS Correlations of the CAT and QLQ-C30 ranged from 0.81 to 0.93 across domains. The mean relative reduction in floor and ceiling effects using the CAT was 42% (range 3-99%). Analyses of known groups validity and responsiveness indicated that, across domains, mean sample size requirements for the CAT were 72% and 70%, respectively, of those using the QLQ-C30. CONCLUSIONS The EORTC CAT Core measures the same domains as the QLQ-C30 with reduced floor/ceiling effects. The CAT generally facilitated the use of smaller samples (about 30% smaller on average) without loss of power compared to the QLQ-C30. Based on this study, the EORTC QLG will release the EORTC CAT Core for general use.
Collapse
|
14
|
Gamper EM, Martini C, Petersen MA, Virgolini I, Holzner B, Giesinger JM. Do patients consider computer-adaptive measures more appropriate than static questionnaires? J Patient Rep Outcomes 2019; 3:7. [PMID: 30694417 PMCID: PMC6381196 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-019-0096-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Computer-adaptive tests (CAT) use individualised sets of questions to assess patient-reported health states, whereas static (conventional) questionnaires present the same questions to all patients. CAT has been shown to increase measurement precision and reduce assessment length. In our study, we investigated if patients perceive CAT questions as more appropriate than static questionnaires, a claim that is frequently associated with CAT measures. Methods We compared the static European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) against its corresponding CAT measures focusing on two domains: Physical Functioning (PF) and Emotional Functioning (EF). Cancer patients completed the questionnaires and participated in a cognitive interview to assess how appropriate they perceive the QLQ-C30 and the CAT questions for their current health state. Results Forty-four cancer patients (mean age = 54.6; 56.8% female) were assessed. For the PF domain, patients considered the CAT items more appropriate (p = 0.002) than the QLQ-C30 items (56.8% vs. 15.9%; 27.2% indifferent). For the EF domain, patients were in favour of the QLQ-C30 items (p < 0.001), with 54.5% considering the QLQ-C30, and 4.5% considering the CAT items to be more appropriate; 40.9% were indifferent. Most patients (N = 36) commented on the preference for the CAT (PF), mentioning better matching of the questions and the health state (38.6%) and better item wording (15.9%). Conclusion For the PF domain the CAT measure better matched the score distribution in the patient sample than the QLQ-C30 PF scale and was consequently considered more appropriate by patients. For the EF domain, the CAT measure did not show better fit than the QLQ-C30 and hence no such preference in terms of appropriateness was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva-Maria Gamper
- Innsbruck Institute of Patient-centered Outcome Research (IIPCOR), Dr. Stumpf Strasse 56, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Caroline Martini
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Morten Aagaard Petersen
- The Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Irene Virgolini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Johannes M Giesinger
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Establishing the European Norm for the health-related quality of life domains of the computer-adaptive test EORTC CAT Core. Eur J Cancer 2019; 107:133-141. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 11/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
16
|
Petersen MA, Aaronson NK, Arraras JI, Chie WC, Conroy T, Costantini A, Dirven L, Fayers P, Gamper EM, Giesinger JM, Habets EJ, Hammerlid E, Helbostad J, Hjermstad MJ, Holzner B, Johnson C, Kemmler G, King MT, Kaasa S, Loge JH, Reijneveld JC, Singer S, Taphoorn MJ, Thamsborg LH, Tomaszewski KA, Velikova G, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Young T, Groenvold M. The EORTC CAT Core—The computer adaptive version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Eur J Cancer 2018; 100:8-16. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
17
|
Groenvold M, Aaronson NK, Darlington ASE, Fitzsimmons D, Greimel E, Holzner B, Reijneveld JC, Tomaszewski KA, Verdonck-de Leeuw I, van de Poll-Franse L. Focusing on Core Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials-Letter. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 22:5617. [PMID: 28151714 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-1529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2016] [Accepted: 07/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mogens Groenvold
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. .,Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Deborah Fitzsimmons
- Swansea Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - Eva Greimel
- Department of Gynecology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Jaap C Reijneveld
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Irma Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lee M, Lee Y, Kim K, Park EY, Lim MC, Kim JS, Kim HS, Kim YB, Kim YM, Joo J, Park SY, Choi CH, Kim JH. Development and Validation of Ovarian Symptom Index-18 and Neurotoxicity-4 for Korean Patients with Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer. Cancer Res Treat 2018; 51:112-118. [PMID: 29510610 PMCID: PMC6333974 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2017.361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Accepted: 03/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to develop Korean versions of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (NCCN-FACT) Ovarian Symptom Index-18 (NFOSI-18) and FACT/Gynecologic Oncology Group (FACT-GOG) Neurotoxicity 4-item (NTX-4), evaluating their reliability and reproducibility. Materials and Methods In converting NFOSI-18 and NTX-4, the following steps were performed: forward translation, backward translation, expert review, pretest of preliminary format, and finalization of Korean versions (K-NFOSI-18 and K-NTX-4). Patients were enrolled from six institutions where each had completed chemotherapy for ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer at least 1 month earlier. In addition to demographics obtained by questionnaire, all subjects were assessed via K-NFOSI-18, K-NTX-4, and a Korean version of the EuroQoL-5 Dimension. Internal structural validity and reliability were evaluated using item internal consistency, item discriminant validity, and Cronbach's α. To evaluate test-retest reliability, K-NFOSI-18 and K-NTX-4 were readministered after 7-21 days, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated. Results Of the 250 women enrolled during the 3-month recruitment period, 13 withdrew or did not respond, leaving 237 (94.8%) for the analyses. Mean patient age was 54.3±10.8 years. Re-testing was performed in 190 patients (80.2%). The total K-NFOSI-18 and K-NTX-4 scores were 49 (range, 20 to 72) and 9 (range, 0 to 16), respectively, with high reliability (Cronbach's α=0.84 and 0.89, respectively) and reproducibility (ICC=0.77 and 0.84, respectively) achieved in retesting. Conclusion Both NFOSI-18 and NTX-4 were successfully developed in Korean with minimal modification. Each Korean version showed high internal consistency and reproducibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yumi Lee
- Department of Nursing, Pukyong National University, Busan, Korea
| | - Kidong Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Eun Young Park
- Biometrics Research Branch, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Cancer Healthcare Research Branch, Center for Uterine Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.,Center for Clinical Trials, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.,Department of Cancer Control & Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Irvine Medical Center, University of California, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Jung-Sup Kim
- Korean Language and Literature, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Seung Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong-Beom Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Yong-Man Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jungnam Joo
- Biometrics Research Branch, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.,Department of Cancer Control & Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sang Yoon Park
- Cancer Healthcare Research Branch, Center for Uterine Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Chel Hun Choi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Hoon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Oude Voshaar MAH, Ten Klooster PM, Vonkeman HE, van de Laar MAFJ. Measuring everyday functional competence using the Rasch assessment of everyday activity limitations (REAL) item bank. Qual Life Res 2017; 26:2949-2959. [PMID: 28638966 PMCID: PMC5655561 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1627-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Traditional patient-reported physical function instruments often poorly differentiate patients with mild-to-moderate disability. We describe the development and psychometric evaluation of a generic item bank for measuring everyday activity limitations in outpatient populations. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Seventy-two items generated from patient interviews and mapped to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) domestic life chapter were administered to 1128 adults representative of the Dutch population. The partial credit model was fitted to the item responses and evaluated with respect to its assumptions, model fit, and differential item functioning (DIF). Measurement performance of a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) algorithm was compared with the SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10). RESULTS A final bank of 41 items was developed. All items demonstrated acceptable fit to the partial credit model and measurement invariance across age, sex, and educational level. Five- and ten-item CAT simulations were shown to have high measurement precision, which exceeded that of SF-36 physical functioning scale across the physical function continuum. Floor effects were absent for a 10-item empirical CAT simulation, and ceiling effects were low (13.5%) compared with SF-36 physical functioning (38.1%). CAT also discriminated better than SF-36 physical functioning between age groups, number of chronic conditions, and respondents with or without rheumatic conditions. CONCLUSION The Rasch assessment of everyday activity limitations (REAL) item bank will hopefully prove a useful instrument for assessing everyday activity limitations. T-scores obtained using derived measures can be used to benchmark physical function outcomes against the general Dutch adult population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn A H Oude Voshaar
- Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - Peter M Ten Klooster
- Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Mart A F J van de Laar
- Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Arthritis Center Twente, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dirven L, Groenvold M, Taphoorn MJB, Conroy T, Tomaszewski KA, Young T, Petersen MA. Psychometric evaluation of an item bank for computerized adaptive testing of the EORTC QLQ-C30 cognitive functioning dimension in cancer patients. Qual Life Res 2017; 26:2919-2929. [PMID: 28707048 PMCID: PMC5655578 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1648-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group is developing computerized adaptive testing (CAT) versions of all EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) scales with the aim to enhance measurement precision. Here we present the results on the field-testing and psychometric evaluation of the item bank for cognitive functioning (CF). METHODS In previous phases (I-III), 44 candidate items were developed measuring CF in cancer patients. In phase IV, these items were psychometrically evaluated in a large sample of international cancer patients. This evaluation included an assessment of dimensionality, fit to the item response theory (IRT) model, differential item functioning (DIF), and measurement properties. RESULTS A total of 1030 cancer patients completed the 44 candidate items on CF. Of these, 34 items could be included in a unidimensional IRT model, showing an acceptable fit. Although several items showed DIF, these had a negligible impact on CF estimation. Measurement precision of the item bank was much higher than the two original QLQ-C30 CF items alone, across the whole continuum. Moreover, CAT measurement may on average reduce study sample sizes with about 35-40% compared to the original QLQ-C30 CF scale, without loss of power. CONCLUSION A CF item bank for CAT measurement consisting of 34 items was established, applicable to various cancer patients across countries. This CAT measurement system will facilitate precise and efficient assessment of HRQOL of cancer patients, without loss of comparability of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Dirven
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO BOX 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
| | - Mogens Groenvold
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin J B Taphoorn
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO BOX 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Thierry Conroy
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine 6, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy Cedex, France
| | - Krzysztof A Tomaszewski
- Health Outcomes Research Unit, Department of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Social Work, Faculty of Education, Ignatianum Academy, Krakow, Poland
| | - Teresa Young
- Lynda Jackson Macmillan Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex, UK
| | - Morten Aa Petersen
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
van Leeuwen M, Kieffer JM, Efficace F, Fosså SD, Bolla M, Collette L, Colombel M, De Giorgi U, Holzner B, van de Poll-Franse LV, van Poppel H, White J, de Wit R, Osanto S, Aaronson NK. International evaluation of the psychometrics of health-related quality of life questionnaires for use among long-term survivors of testicular and prostate cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017; 15:97. [PMID: 28490338 PMCID: PMC5426020 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-017-0670-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2016] [Accepted: 04/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Understanding of the physical, functional and psychosocial health problems and needs of cancer survivors requires cross-national and cross-cultural standardization of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires that capture the full range of issues relevant to cancer survivors. To our knowledge, only one study has investigated in a comprehensive way whether a questionnaire used to evaluate HRQoL in cancer patients under active treatment is also reliable and valid when used among (long-term) cancer survivors. In this study we evaluated, in an international context, the psychometrics of HRQoL questionnaires for use among long-term, disease-free, survivors of testicular and prostate cancer. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we recruited long-term survivors of testicular and prostate cancer from Northern and Southern Europe and from the United Kingdom who had participated in two phase III EORTC clinical trials. Participants completed the SF-36 Health Survey, the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, the QLQ-PR25 (for prostate cancer) or the QLQ-TC26 (for testicular cancer) questionnaires, and the Impact of Cancer questionnaire. Testicular cancer survivors also completed subscales from the Nordic Questionnaire for Monitoring the Age Diverse Workforce. Results Two hundred forty-two men (66% response rate) were recruited into the study. The average time since treatment was more than 10 years. Overall, there were few missing questionnaire data, although scales related to sexuality, satisfaction with care and relationship concerns of men without partners were missing in more than 10% of cases. Debriefing showed that in general the questionnaires were accepted well. Many of the survivors scored at the upper extremes of the questionnaires, resulting in floor and ceiling effects in 64% of the scales. All of the questionnaires investigated met the threshold of 0.70 for group level reliability, with the exception of the QLQ-TC26 (mean reliability .64) and the QLQ-PR25 (mean reliability .69). The questionnaires were able to discriminate clearly between patients with and without comorbid conditions. Conclusions The currently available HRQoL questionnaires exhibit acceptable psychometric properties and were well received by patients, but additional efforts are needed to ensure that the full range of survivor-specific issues is assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobien M Kieffer
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fabio Efficace
- Unit, Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA) Data Center, Via Benevento 6, Rome, Italy
| | - Sophie D Fosså
- Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospital, National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michel Bolla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire A Michallon, BP217, 38043, Grenoble cedex 09, France
| | | | - Marc Colombel
- Department of General Urology and Oncology, Hôpital Édouard Herriot, 5 Place d'Arsonval, Lyon, France
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) - IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- Department of Psychiatry, Innsbruck University Hospital, Sternwartestraße 15, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Comprehensive Cancer Organisation Netherlands (CCCS), Netherlands Cancer Registry, Zernikestraat 29, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrik van Poppel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, K.U. Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jeff White
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Center, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Ronald de Wit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute (Dr Daniel den Hoed Kliniek) and Erasmus University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne Osanto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gamper EM, Petersen MA, Aaronson N, Costantini A, Giesinger JM, Holzner B, Kemmler G, Oberguggenberger A, Singer S, Young T, Groenvold M. Development of an item bank for the EORTC Role Functioning Computer Adaptive Test (EORTC RF-CAT). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2016; 14:72. [PMID: 27150974 PMCID: PMC4858863 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-016-0475-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2015] [Accepted: 04/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Role functioning (RF) as a core construct of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) comprises aspects of occupational and social roles relevant for patients in all treatment phases as well as for survivors. The objective of the current study was to improve its assessment by developing a computer-adaptive test (CAT) for RF. This was part of a larger project whose objective is to develop a CAT version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 which is one of the most widely used HRQOL instruments in oncology. METHODS In accordance with EORTC guidelines, the development of the RF-CAT comprised four phases. Phase I involved the conceptualization of RF. In Phase II, a provisional list of items was defined and revised by experts in the field. In phase III, feedback was obtained from cancer patients in various countries. Phase IV comprised field testing in an international sample, calibration of the item bank, and evaluation of the psychometric performance of the RF-CAT. RESULTS Phases I-III yielded a list of 12 items eligible for phase IV field-testing. The field-testing sample included 1,023 patients from Austria, Denmark, Italy, and the UK. Psychometric evaluation and item response theory analyses yielded 10 items with good psychometric properties. The resulting item bank exhibits excellent reliability (mean reliability = 0.85, median = 0.95). Using the RF-CAT may allow sample size savings from 11 % up to 50 % compared to using the QLQ-C30 RF scale. CONCLUSIONS The RF-CAT item bank improves the precision and efficiency with which RF can be assessed, promoting its integration into oncology research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva-Maria Gamper
- Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy and Department for Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. .,Department for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraßé 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Morten Aa Petersen
- The Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Neil Aaronson
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anna Costantini
- Psychoncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital Sapienza University of Rome, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Johannes M Giesinger
- Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.,Department for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraßé 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Georg Kemmler
- Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.,Department for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraßé 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Anne Oberguggenberger
- Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraße 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.,Department for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstraßé 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Susanne Singer
- Department of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Mainz, Saarstraße 21, 55122, Mainz, Germany
| | - Teresa Young
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Lynda Jackson Macmillan Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 2RN, UK
| | - Mogens Groenvold
- The Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Public Health, Institute of Health Services Research, University of Copenhagen, Norregade 10, 1165, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kluetz PG, Slagle A, Papadopoulos EJ, Johnson LL, Donoghue M, Kwitkowski VE, Chen WH, Sridhara R, Farrell AT, Keegan P, Kim G, Pazdur R. Focusing on Core Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials: Symptomatic Adverse Events, Physical Function, and Disease-Related Symptoms. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22:1553-8. [PMID: 26758559 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 226] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2015] [Accepted: 12/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Cancer clinical trials have relied on overall survival and measures of tumor growth or reduction to assess the efficacy of a drug. However, benefits are often accompanied by significant symptomatic toxicities. The degree to which a therapy improves disease symptoms and introduces symptomatic toxicity affects how patients function in their daily lives. These concepts are important contributors to health-related quality of life (HRQOL). In this article, we discuss patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment in cancer trials and challenges relying solely on static multi-item HRQOL instruments. We propose focusing on three separate measures of well-defined concepts: symptomatic adverse events, physical function, and disease-related symptoms, which are key contributors to the effect of a therapy on HRQOL. Separate measures of these three concepts may facilitate the incorporation of emerging contemporary instruments that can tailor the PRO assessment strategy to different trial contexts. Irrespective of the PRO measures used, continued improvement in trial design and conduct is crucial to decrease missing data and optimize the quality of PRO information. International stakeholder collaboration and continued research into optimal practices for PRO and other clinical outcome assessments are necessary to advance a common framework for generating and reporting rigorous patient-centered data from cancer clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul G Kluetz
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
| | - Ashley Slagle
- Clinical Outcome Assessment Staff, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Elektra J Papadopoulos
- Clinical Outcome Assessment Staff, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Laura Lee Johnson
- Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Martha Donoghue
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Virginia E Kwitkowski
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Wen-Hung Chen
- Clinical Outcome Assessment Staff, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Rajeshwari Sridhara
- Office of Biostatistics, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Ann T Farrell
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Patricia Keegan
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Geoffrey Kim
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Richard Pazdur
- Office of Hematology and Oncology Products, Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Petersen MA, Gamper EM, Costantini A, Giesinger JM, Holzner B, Johnson C, Sztankay M, Young T, Groenvold M. An emotional functioning item bank of 24 items for computerized adaptive testing (CAT) was established. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 70:90-100. [PMID: 26363341 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2014] [Revised: 09/04/2015] [Accepted: 09/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To improve measurement precision, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group is developing an item bank for computerized adaptive testing (CAT) of emotional functioning (EF). The item bank will be within the conceptual framework of the widely used EORTC Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ-C30). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING On the basis of literature search and evaluations by international samples of experts and cancer patients, 38 candidate items were developed. The psychometric properties of the items were evaluated in a large international sample of cancer patients. This included evaluations of dimensionality, item response theory (IRT) model fit, differential item functioning (DIF), and of measurement precision/statistical power. RESULTS Responses were obtained from 1,023 cancer patients from four countries. The evaluations showed that 24 items could be included in a unidimensional IRT model. DIF did not seem to have any significant impact on the estimation of EF. Evaluations indicated that the CAT measure may reduce sample size requirements by up to 50% compared to the QLQ-C30 EF scale without reducing power. CONCLUSION On the basis of thorough psychometric evaluations, we have established an EF item bank of 24 items. This will allow for more precise and flexible measurement of EF, while maintaining backward compatibility with the QLQ-C30 EF scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morten Aa Petersen
- The Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Eva-Maria Gamper
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Christoph-Probst-Platz 1, Innrain 52, A - 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Anna Costantini
- Psycho-oncology Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Department of Oncological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University, Via di Grottarossa 1035 - 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Johannes M Giesinger
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Christoph-Probst-Platz 1, Innrain 52, A - 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Christoph-Probst-Platz 1, Innrain 52, A - 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Colin Johnson
- Surgical Unit, University of Southampton, University Road, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Monika Sztankay
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Christoph-Probst-Platz 1, Innrain 52, A - 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Teresa Young
- Lynda Jackson Macmillan Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex HA6 2RN, UK
| | - Mogens Groenvold
- The Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark; Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, P.O. Box 2099, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Development of an item bank for computerized adaptive test (CAT) measurement of pain. Qual Life Res 2015; 25:1-11. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1069-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
26
|
Development of a lack of appetite item bank for computer-adaptive testing (CAT). Support Care Cancer 2014; 23:1541-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2498-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2014] [Accepted: 10/24/2014] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
27
|
Juul T, Petersen MA, Holzner B, Laurberg S, Christensen P, Grønvold M. Danish population-based reference data for the EORTC QLQ-C30: associations with gender, age and morbidity. Qual Life Res 2014; 23:2183-93. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0675-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
28
|
Gamper EM, Groenvold M, Petersen MA, Young T, Costantini A, Aaronson N, Giesinger JM, Meraner V, Kemmler G, Holzner B. The EORTC emotional functioning computerized adaptive test: phases I-III of a cross-cultural item bank development. Psychooncology 2013; 23:397-403. [PMID: 24217943 PMCID: PMC3974657 DOI: 10.1002/pon.3427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2013] [Revised: 08/27/2013] [Accepted: 09/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group is currently developing computerized adaptive testing measures for the Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (QLQ-C30) scales. The work presented here describes the development of an EORTC item bank for emotional functioning (EF), which is one of the core domains of the QLQ-C30. Methods According to the EORTC guidelines on module development, the development of the EF item bank comprised four phases, of which the phases I–III are reported in the present paper. Phase I involved defining the theoretical framework for the EF item bank and a literature search. Phase II included pre-defined item selection steps and a multi-stage expert review process. In phase III, feedback from cancer patients from different countries was obtained. Results On the basis of literature search in phase I, a list of 1750 items was generated. These were reviewed and further developed in phase II with a focus on relevance, redundancy, clarity, and difficulty. The development and selection steps led to a preliminary list of 41 items. In phase III, patient interviews (N = 41; Austria, Denmark, Italy, and the UK) were conducted with the preliminary item list, resulting in some minor changes to item wording. The final list comprised 38 items. Discussion The phases I–III of the developmental process have resulted in an EF item list that was well accepted by patients in several countries. The items will be subjected to larger-scale field testing in order to establish their psychometric characteristics and their fit to an item response theory model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva-Maria Gamper
- Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Clinic for Biological Psychiatry, Anichstraße 35, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Johnsen AT, Damkier A, Vejlgaard TB, Lindschou J, Sjøgren P, Gluud C, Neergaard MA, Petersen MA, Lundorff LE, Pedersen L, Fayers P, Strömgren AS, Higginson IJ, Groenvold M. A randomised, multicentre clinical trial of specialised palliative care plus standard treatment versus standard treatment alone for cancer patients with palliative care needs: the Danish palliative care trial (DanPaCT) protocol. BMC Palliat Care 2013; 12:37. [PMID: 24152880 PMCID: PMC3874751 DOI: 10.1186/1472-684x-12-37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2013] [Accepted: 10/15/2013] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advanced cancer patients experience considerable symptoms, problems, and needs. Early referral of these patients to specialised palliative care (SPC) could improve their symptoms and problems.The Danish Palliative Care Trial (DanPaCT) investigates whether patients with metastatic cancer, who report palliative needs in a screening, will benefit from being referred to 'early SPC'. METHODS/DESIGN DanPaCT is a clinical, multicentre, parallel-group superiority trial with balanced randomisation (1:1). The planned sample size is 300 patients. Patients are randomised to specialised palliative care (SPC) plus standard treatment versus standard treatment. Consecutive patients from oncology departments are screened for palliative needs with a questionnaire if they: a) have metastatic cancer; b) are 18 years or above; and c) have no prior contact with SPC. Patients with palliative needs (i.e. symptoms/problems exceeding a certain threshold) according to the questionnaire are eligible. The primary outcome is the change in the patients' primary need (the most severe symptom/problem measured with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)). Secondary outcomes are other symptoms/problems (EORTC QLQ-C30), satisfaction with health care (FAMCARE P-16), anxiety and depression (the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale), survival, and health care costs. DISCUSSION Only few trials have investigated the effects of SPC. To our knowledge DanPaCT is the first trial to investigate screening based 'early SPC' for patients with a broad spectrum of cancer diagnosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current controlled Trials NCT01348048.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna T Johnsen
- Department of Palliative Medicine, The Research Unit, Bispebjerg Hospital 20D, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, DK-2400 Copenhagen, NV,Denmark.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Petersen MA, Aaronson NK, Arraras JI, Chie WC, Conroy T, Costantini A, Giesinger JM, Holzner B, King MT, Singer S, Velikova G, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Young T, Groenvold M. The EORTC computer-adaptive tests measuring physical functioning and fatigue exhibited high levels of measurement precision and efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66:330-9. [PMID: 23347855 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2011] [Revised: 08/28/2012] [Accepted: 09/10/2012] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group is developing a computer-adaptive test (CAT) version of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). We evaluated the measurement properties of the CAT versions of physical functioning (PF) and fatigue (FA) and compared these with the corresponding QLQ-C30 scales. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Based on international samples of more than 1,000 cancer patients, we simulated CAT administration of varying numbers of items and compared the resulting scores with those based on all items in the respective item pools. Furthermore, the relative validity (RV) of CATs was compared with that of the QLQ-C30 scales using known groups validity. RESULTS For both dimensions, CATs of all lengths resulted in unbiased score estimates. CATs consisting of five or more items had reliability>0.90, correlated ≥ 0.97 with the full scale, and had root mean square error <0.25. The average RVs for these CATs ranged 1.02-1.33, indicating possible savings in sample size requirements of 3-42% using CAT. CONCLUSION The CAT versions of PF and FA exhibited high levels of measurement precision and efficiency. The potential savings in sample size requirements using CATs compared with those using the original QLQ-C30 scales were typically 20% or more.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morten Aa Petersen
- Research Unit, Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Petersen MA, Giesinger JM, Holzner B, Arraras JI, Conroy T, Gamper EM, King MT, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Young T, Groenvold M. Psychometric evaluation of the EORTC computerized adaptive test (CAT) fatigue item pool. Qual Life Res 2013; 22:2443-54. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0372-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
32
|
Cabrero-García J, Ramos-Pichardo JD, Muñoz-Mendoza CL, Cabañero-Martínez MJ, González-Llopis L, Reig-Ferrer A. Validation of a mobility item bank for older patients in primary care. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012; 10:147. [PMID: 23216846 PMCID: PMC3547751 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2012] [Accepted: 11/29/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To develop and validate an item bank to measure mobility in older people in primary care and to analyse differential item functioning (DIF) and differential bundle functioning (DBF) by sex. METHODS A pool of 48 mobility items was administered by interview to 593 older people attending primary health care practices. The pool contained four domains based on the International Classification of Functioning: changing and maintaining body position, carrying, lifting and pushing, walking and going up and down stairs. RESULTS The Late Life Mobility item bank consisted of 35 items, and measured with a reliability of 0.90 or more across the full spectrum of mobility, except at the higher end of better functioning. No evidence was found of non-uniform DIF but uniform DIF was observed, mainly for items in the changing and maintaining body position and carrying, lifting and pushing domains. The walking domain did not display DBF, but the other three domains did, principally the carrying, lifting and pushing items. CONCLUSIONS During the design and validation of an item bank to measure mobility in older people, we found that strength (carrying, lifting and pushing) items formed a secondary dimension that produced DBF. More research is needed to determine how best to include strength items in a mobility measure, or whether it would be more appropriate to design separate measures for each construct.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julio Cabrero-García
- Department of Nursing, University of Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hjermstad MJ, Lie HC, Caraceni A, Currow DC, Fainsinger RL, Gundersen OE, Haugen DF, Heitzer E, Radbruch L, Stone PC, Strasser F, Kaasa S, Loge JH. Computer-based symptom assessment is feasible in patients with advanced cancer: results from an international multicenter study, the EPCRC-CSA. J Pain Symptom Manage 2012; 44:639-54. [PMID: 22795905 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2011] [Revised: 10/25/2011] [Accepted: 10/31/2011] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Symptom assessment by computers is only effective if it provides valid results and is perceived as useful for clinical use by the end users: patients and health care providers. OBJECTIVES To identify factors associated with discontinuation, time expenditure, and patient preferences of the computerized symptom assessment used in an international multicenter data collection project: the European Palliative Care Research Collaborative-Computerized Symptom Assessment. METHODS Cancer patients with incurable metastatic or locally advanced disease were recruited from 17 centers in eight countries, providing 1017 records for analyses. Observer-based registrations and patient-reported measures on pain, depression, and physical function were entered on touch screen laptop computers. RESULTS The entire assessment was completed by 94.9% (n = 965), with median age 63 years (range 18-91 years) and median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score of 70 (range 20-100). Predictive factors for noncompletion were higher age, lower KPS, and more pain (P ≤ 0.012). Time expenditure among completers increased with higher age, male gender, Norwegian nationality, number of comorbidities, and lower physical functioning (P ≤ 0.007) but was inversely related to pain levels and tiredness (P ≤ 0.03). Need for assistance was predicted by higher age, nationality other than Norwegian, lower KPS, and lower educational level (P < 0.001). More than 50% of patients preferred computerized assessment to a paper and pencil version. CONCLUSION The high completion rate shows that symptom assessment by computers is feasible in patients with advanced cancer. However, reduced performance status reduces compliance and increases the need for assistance. Future work should aim at identifying the minimum set of valid screening questions and refine the software to optimize symptom assessment and reduce respondent burden in frail patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Jensen Hjermstad
- European Palliative Care Research Centre, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
The impact of individual quality of life assessment on psychosocial attention in patients with chest malignancies: a randomized study. Support Care Cancer 2012; 21:87-95. [DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1496-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2011] [Accepted: 05/09/2012] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
35
|
Health-Related Quality of Life in EORTC clinical trials — 30 years of progress from methodological developments to making a real impact on oncology practice. EJC Suppl 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(12)70023-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
36
|
Giesinger JM, Aa Petersen M, Groenvold M, Aaronson NK, Arraras JI, Conroy T, Gamper EM, Kemmler G, King MT, Oberguggenberger AS, Velikova G, Young T, Holzner B. Cross-cultural development of an item list for computer-adaptive testing of fatigue in oncological patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2011; 9:19. [PMID: 21447160 PMCID: PMC3078839 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2010] [Accepted: 03/29/2011] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Within an ongoing project of the EORTC Quality of Life Group, we are developing computerized adaptive test (CAT) measures for the QLQ-C30 scales. These new CAT measures are conceptualised to reflect the same constructs as the QLQ-C30 scales. Accordingly, the Fatigue-CAT is intended to capture physical and general fatigue. METHODS The EORTC approach to CAT development comprises four phases (literature search, operationalisation, pre-testing, and field testing). Phases I-III are described in detail in this paper. A literature search for fatigue items was performed in major medical databases. After refinement through several expert panels, the remaining items were used as the basis for adapting items and/or formulating new items fitting the EORTC item style. To obtain feedback from patients with cancer, these English items were translated into Danish, French, German, and Spanish and tested in the respective countries. RESULTS Based on the literature search a list containing 588 items was generated. After a comprehensive item selection procedure focusing on content, redundancy, item clarity and item difficulty a list of 44 fatigue items was generated. Patient interviews (n = 52) resulted in 12 revisions of wording and translations. DISCUSSION The item list developed in phases I-III will be further investigated within a field-testing phase (IV) to examine psychometric characteristics and to fit an item response theory model. The Fatigue CAT based on this item bank will provide scores that are backward-compatible to the original QLQ-C30 fatigue scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes M Giesinger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstr.35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Morten Aa Petersen
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Bispebjerg bakke 23, DK-2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mogens Groenvold
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Bispebjerg bakke 23, DK-2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Juan I Arraras
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital of Navarre, C/Irunlarrea 3, ES-31008 Pamplona, Spain
| | - Thierry Conroy
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Alexis Vautrin, 6 Avenue de Bourgogne, F-54500 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Eva M Gamper
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstr.35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Georg Kemmler
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstr.35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Madeleine T King
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Brennan MacCallum Building A18, AU-2006 Sydney, Australia
| | - Anne S Oberguggenberger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstr.35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Teresa Young
- Lynda Jackson Macmillan Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Rickmansworth Rd, GB-HA62RN Northwood, UK
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstr.35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|