1
|
Valaire R, Garden F, Razmovski‐Naumovski V. Are measures and related symptoms of cachexia recorded as outcomes in gastrointestinal cancer chemotherapy clinical trials? J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2024; 15:1146-1156. [PMID: 38533530 PMCID: PMC11154796 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cachexia is prevalent in gastrointestinal cancers and worsens patient outcomes and chemotherapy compliance. We examined to what extent registered gastrointestinal cancer chemotherapy clinical trials record measures and related symptoms of cachexia as outcomes, and whether these were associated with trial characteristics. METHODS Four public trial registries (2012-2022) were accessed for Phase II and/or III randomized controlled pancreatic, gastric, and colorectal cancer chemotherapy trial protocols. Trial outcome measures of overall survival and toxicity/side effects, and those related to cachexia [physical activity, weight/body mass index (BMI), dietary limitations, caloric intake, lean muscle mass] and symptoms (appetite loss, diarrhoea, pain, fatigue/insomnia, constipation, nausea, vomiting, and oral mucositis) were extracted, along with the number and types of performance status and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) tools. Data were summarized descriptively. Chi-square tests examined associations between outcomes and trial characteristics (cancer type, trial location, funding source, PROs tools, and commencement year). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS We included 540 trial protocols (pancreatic (35.2%), colorectal (33.3%) and gastric (31.5%)), with most trials from Europe (44.1%). Trial lead investigator was from academia (28.3%), industry (27.6%) and government (26.3%). Allied health professional involvement (26.9%) occurred at eligibility. Adjuvant therapy in trials was mainly treatment-related (68.1%). Additional medication included anti-nausea (2.2%) and analgesia (0.9%). Trial protocols mostly recorded overall survival (90.4%) and toxicity (78.9%), and the symptoms appetite loss (26.1%) and diarrhoea (19.1%), with the other symptoms recorded in <10% of the trials. Reporting of physical activity (P = 0.001), dietary limitations (P = 0.002), lean muscle mass (P = 0.027), appetite loss (P < 0.001), pain (P = 0.001), nausea (P = 0.012), and oral mucositis (P = 0.049) varied depending cancer type. Toxicity/side effects (P = 0.022), physical activity (P < 0.001), appetite loss, nausea, and vomiting (all P < 0.001), diarrhoea (P = 0.010), pain (P = 0.001), fatigue/insomnia (P = 0.001) varied depending on the trial location. Trial funding was predominantly from private/industry (34.3%) and influenced the reporting of overall survival (P = 0.049), weight/BMI (P = 0.005), caloric intake (P = 0.015), and pain (P = 0.031). Performance status and PROs tools were mentioned in 91.2% and 46.3% of the trials, respectively. Trials that incorporated PROs tools were more likely to report cachexia related outcomes, except for overall survival, lean muscle mass, and oral mucositis. The proportion of trials measuring weight/BMI increased with trial commencement year (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Cachexia-related outcomes were under-recorded in gastrointestinal cancer chemotherapy trials. As trial patients experience a high symptom burden, cachexia-relevant measures and symptoms should be assessed throughout the trial, and integrated with primary endpoints to support their progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ross Valaire
- Faculty of Medicine & Health, South West Sydney Clinical CampusesUniversity of New South Wales (UNSW) SydneyKensingtonNSWAustralia
| | - Frances Garden
- Faculty of Medicine & Health, South West Sydney Clinical CampusesUniversity of New South Wales (UNSW) SydneyKensingtonNSWAustralia
| | - Valentina Razmovski‐Naumovski
- Faculty of Medicine & Health, South West Sydney Clinical CampusesUniversity of New South Wales (UNSW) SydneyKensingtonNSWAustralia
- School of MedicineWestern Sydney UniversityCampbelltownNSWAustralia
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical ResearchSydneyNSWAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yoon PS, Navarro S, Barzi A, Ochoa-Dominguez CY, Arizpe A, Farias AJ. Racial and ethnic disparities in self-reported general and mental health status among colorectal cancer survivors: impact of sociodemographic factors and implications for mortality-a SEER-CAHPS study. Qual Life Res 2024; 33:793-804. [PMID: 38153617 PMCID: PMC10894139 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03566-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-reported outcomes are recognized as strong predictors of cancer prognosis. This study examines racial and ethnic differences in self-reported general health status (GHS) and mental health status (MHS) among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS A retrospective analysis of Medicare beneficiaries between 1998 and 2011 with non-distant CRC who underwent curative resection and completed a Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey within 6-36 months of CRC diagnosis. Analysis included a stepwise logistic regression to examine the relationship between race and ethnicity and fair or poor health status, and a proportional hazards model to determine the mortality risk associated with fair or poor health status. RESULTS Of 1867 patients, Non-Hispanic Black (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.06-2.28) and Hispanic (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.04-2.11) patients had higher unadjusted odds for fair or poor GHS compared to Non-Hispanic White patients, also Hispanic patients had higher unadjusted odds for fair or poor MHS (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.23-3.01). These relationships persisted after adjusting for clinical factors but were attenuated after subsequently adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Compared to those reporting good to excellent health status, patients reporting fair or poor GHS or MHS had an increased mortality risk (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.31-1.76 and OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.34-1.99, respectively). CONCLUSION Racial and ethnic differences in GHS and MHS reported after CRC diagnosis are mainly driven by sociodemographic factors and reflect a higher risk of mortality. Identifying unmet biopsychosocial needs is necessary to promote equitable care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul S Yoon
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Stephanie Navarro
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Afsaneh Barzi
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Carol Y Ochoa-Dominguez
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Angel Arizpe
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Albert J Farias
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- The Gehr Family Center for Health System Science, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine of USC, 2001 N. Soto St., Suite 318B, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang Y, Tian L, Liu X, Zhang H, Tang Y, Zhang H, Nie W, Wang L. Multidimensional Predictors of Cancer-Related Fatigue Based on the Predisposing, Precipitating, and Perpetuating (3P) Model: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5879. [PMID: 38136423 PMCID: PMC10741552 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a widespread symptom with high prevalence in cancer patients, seriously affecting their quality of life. In the context of precision care, constructing machine learning-based prediction models for early screening and assessment of CRF is beneficial to this situation. To further understand the predictors of CRF for model construction, we conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases, combining CRF with predictor-related terms. A total of 27 papers met the inclusion criteria. We evaluated the above studies into three subgroups following the predisposing, precipitating, and perpetuating (3P) factor model. (1) Predisposing factors-baseline fatigue, demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, psychosocial traits and physical symptoms. (2) Precipitating factors-type and stage of chemotherapy, inflammatory factors, laboratory indicators and metabolic changes. (3) Perpetuating factors-a low level of physical activity and poorer nutritional status. Future research should prioritize large-scale prospective studies with emerging technologies to identify accurate predictors of CRF. The assessment and management of CRF should also focus on the above factors, especially the controllable precipitating factors, to improve the quality of life of cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiming Wang
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, No. 965 Xinjiang Street, Changchun 130021, China; (Y.W.); (L.T.)
| | - Lv Tian
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, No. 965 Xinjiang Street, Changchun 130021, China; (Y.W.); (L.T.)
| | - Xia Liu
- Senior Department of Hematology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100071, China; (X.L.); (Y.T.); (H.Z.)
| | - Hao Zhang
- Yanda Medical Research Institute, Hebei Yanda Hospital, Sanhe 065201, China;
| | - Yongchun Tang
- Senior Department of Hematology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100071, China; (X.L.); (Y.T.); (H.Z.)
| | - Hong Zhang
- Senior Department of Hematology, The Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100071, China; (X.L.); (Y.T.); (H.Z.)
| | - Wenbo Nie
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, No. 965 Xinjiang Street, Changchun 130021, China; (Y.W.); (L.T.)
| | - Lisheng Wang
- School of Nursing, Jilin University, No. 965 Xinjiang Street, Changchun 130021, China; (Y.W.); (L.T.)
- Yanda Medical Research Institute, Hebei Yanda Hospital, Sanhe 065201, China;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li X, Hoogland AI, Small BJ, Crowder SL, Gonzalez BD, Oswald LB, Sleight AG, Nguyen N, Lorona NC, Damerell V, Komrokji KR, Mooney K, Playdon MC, Ulrich CM, Li CI, Shibata D, Toriola AT, Ose J, Peoples AR, Siegel EM, Bower JE, Schneider M, Gigic B, Figueiredo JC, Jim HSL. Trajectories and risk factors of fatigue following colorectal cancer diagnosis. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:2054-2063. [PMID: 37700526 PMCID: PMC10815933 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
AIM This study sought to identify groups of colorectal cancer patients based upon trajectories of fatigue and examine how demographic, clinical and behavioural risk factors differentiate these groups. METHOD Patients were from six cancer centres in the United States and Germany. Fatigue was measured using the fatigue subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) at five time points (baseline/enrolment and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after diagnosis). Piecewise growth mixture models identified latent trajectories of fatigue. Logistic regression models examined differences in demographic, clinical and behavioural characteristics between fatigue trajectory groups. RESULTS Among 1615 participants (57% men, 86% non-Hispanic White, mean age 61 ± 13 years at diagnosis), three distinct groups were identified. In the high fatigue group (36%), fatigue significantly increased in the first 6 months after diagnosis and then showed statistically and clinically significant improvement from 6 to 24 months (P values < 0.01). Throughout the study period, average fatigue met or exceeded cutoffs for clinical significance. In the moderate (34%) and low (30%) fatigue groups, fatigue levels remained below or near population norms across the study period. Patients who were diagnosed with Stage II-IV disease and/or current smokers were more likely to be in the high fatigue than in the moderate fatigue group (P values < 0.05). CONCLUSION A large proportion of colorectal cancer patients experienced sustained fatigue after initiation of cancer treatment. Patients with high fatigue at the time of diagnosis may benefit from early supportive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyin Li
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Aasha I Hoogland
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Brent J Small
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Sylvia L Crowder
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Brian D Gonzalez
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Laura B Oswald
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Alix G Sleight
- Department of Medicine, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nathalie Nguyen
- Department of Medicine, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nicole C Lorona
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Victoria Damerell
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Khaled R Komrokji
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Kathi Mooney
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Mary C Playdon
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Cornelia M Ulrich
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Christopher I Li
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David Shibata
- Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Adetunji T Toriola
- Department of Surgery, Washington University St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jennifer Ose
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Anita R Peoples
- Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
- Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Erin M Siegel
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | - Martin Schneider
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Biljana Gigic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jane C Figueiredo
- Department of Medicine, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Heather S L Jim
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gudmundstuen AM, Efficace F, Tjønnfjord GE, Skaarud KJ, Cottone F, Hjermstad MJ, Iversen PO. The prognostic value of patient-reported outcomes in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: exploratory analysis of a randomized nutrition intervention trial. Ann Hematol 2023; 102:927-935. [PMID: 36864210 PMCID: PMC9998318 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05149-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
Whether patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can predict overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) among recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), is unclear. We performed an exploratory analysis of the prognostic value of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among 117 recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) who participated in a randomized nutrition intervention trial. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate possible associations between PROs collected pre-allo-HSCT (baseline) using scores from the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and 1-year overall survival (OS), whereas logistic regression was used to study associations between these PROs and 1-year non-relapse mortality (NRM). Multivariable analyses indicated that only the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) and the European Bone Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) risk score were associated with 1-year OS. In the multivariable model including clinical-sociodemographic factors for 1-year NRM, our analysis showed that living alone (p=0.009), HCT-CI (p=0.016), EBMT risk score (p=0.002), and stem cell source (p=0.046) could be associated with 1-year NRM. Moreover, in the multivariable model, our analysis showed that only appetite loss from the QLQ-C30 was associated with 1-year NRM (p=0.026). In conclusion, in this specific setting, our analysis suggests that the commonly used HCT-CI and EBMT risk scores could be predictive for both 1-year OS and 1-year NRM, whereas baseline PROs in general were not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Marte Gudmundstuen
- Department of Haematology, Oslo University Hospital, 4950 Nydalen, NO-0424, Oslo, Norway. .,Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Fabio Efficace
- Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA), Data Centre and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Rome, Italy
| | - Geir Erland Tjønnfjord
- Department of Haematology, Oslo University Hospital, 4950 Nydalen, NO-0424, Oslo, Norway.,K.G. Jebsen Centre for B Cell Malignancies, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristin Joan Skaarud
- Department of Haematology, Oslo University Hospital, 4950 Nydalen, NO-0424, Oslo, Norway.,Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway
| | - Francesco Cottone
- Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA), Data Centre and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Rome, Italy
| | - Marianne Jensen Hjermstad
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC) Department of Oncology Oslo University Hospital/Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Regional Advisory Unit for Palliative Care, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Per Ole Iversen
- Department of Haematology, Oslo University Hospital, 4950 Nydalen, NO-0424, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Howell M, Amir N, Guha C, Manera K, Tong A. The critical role of mixed methods research in developing valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measures. Methods 2022; 205:213-219. [PMID: 35878750 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2022.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Randomised controlled clinical trials provide the gold standard for evidence underpinning clinical guidelines and patient centred care. However, this is only true when they are robustly designed, conducted and reported and then only if they include outcomes that are important to patients and clinicians. Important outcomes include those that measure impact on patient experience, quality of life, overall well-being, and physical, social, cognitive and emotional functioning, all of which require patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Patient centred care must be underpinned by objective evidence of the effect of interventions on outcomes that are important to patients. Evidence for patient reported outcomes must be supported by valid and reliable PROMs. Importantly the PROM must reflect patient experience of the impact of the intervention on the outcome and enable quantitative evaluation of that impact. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the critical role of mixed methods research in developing PROMs that are valid (measure what they purport to measure), acceptable to those reporting the outcome and able to reliably detect meaningful differences between individuals with different conditions or severity and with time. This can only be achieved through a structured mixed methods program combining qualitative and quantitative research techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Howell
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Noa Amir
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Chandana Guha
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Karine Manera
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ooki A, Morita S, Tsuji A, Iwamoto S, Hara H, Tanioka H, Satake H, Kataoka M, Kotaka M, Kagawa Y, Nakamura M, Shingai T, Ishikawa M, Miyake Y, Suto T, Hashiguchi Y, Yabuno T, Ando M, Sakamoto J, Yamaguchi K. Impact of early tumor shrinkage on quality of life in patients treated with first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: results of Phase II QUACK trial. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:711. [PMID: 35765021 PMCID: PMC9238042 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09811-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Although early tumor shrinkage (ETS) is a predictor of improved overall survival (OS), the association between ETS and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) remains unclear for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy. Methods The data were collected from a prospective trial that assessed HRQOL using the EORTC QLQ-C30. The impact of ETS on HRQOL was estimated using a linear mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Results ETS was achieved in 82 (64.1%) of 128 mCRC patients treated with first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy, and these patients had a significantly longer OS than those without ETS (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.20–0.72; P = .002). Asymptomatic patients with ETS had a favorable OS, while symptomatic patients without ETS had a worse OS (2-year OS rates, 77.8% vs. 42.5%). Symptomatic patients with ETS had similar outcomes as asymptomatic patients without ETS (2-year OS rates, 64.1% vs. 67.0%). For symptomatic patients, ETS was associated with improved HRQOL scores between baseline and 8 weeks: the mean changes for patients with and without ETS were 5.86 and -4.94 for global health status (GHS)/QOL, 26.73 and 3.79 for physical functioning, and 13.58 and -3.10 for social functioning, respectively. The improved HRQOL was comparable to that of asymptomatic patients without ETS. For asymptomatic patients, ETS showed a decreased deterioration in HRQOL. Conclusion Our findings highlight the importance of ETS for HRQOL and prognostic estimates, and assessing ETS may provide clinically useful information for physicians and patients to make more informed decisions. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09811-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Ooki
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.
| | - Satoshi Morita
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Akihito Tsuji
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kagawa University, Kita, Japan
| | - Shigeyoshi Iwamoto
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University Kouri Hospital, Neyagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroki Hara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Tanioka
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Hironaga Satake
- Cancer Treatment Center, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masato Kataoka
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | | | - Masato Nakamura
- Aizawa Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Shingai
- Department of Surgery, Osaka Saiseikai Senri Hospital, Suita, Japan
| | - Masashi Ishikawa
- Department of Surgery, Shikoku Central Hospital, Shikokuchuo, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Miyake
- Department of Surgery, Osaka Minato Central Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takeshi Suto
- Department of Surgery, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Yojiro Hashiguchi
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taichi Yabuno
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Masahiko Ando
- Department of Advanced Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | - Kensei Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Khatkov IE, Minaeva OA, Domrachev SA, Priymak MA, Solovyev NO, Tyutyunnik PS. PROM a contemporary approach to assessing the quality of life of patients with cancer. TERAPEVT ARKH 2022; 94:122-128. [DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2022.01.201343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
PRO (patient reported outcomes) is a patient's subjective assessment of health and quality of life, without interpretation by a specialist. PROM (patient reported outcomes measure) questionnaires are used to analyzing this data. Assessment of the quality of life is a perspective direction, which allows to improve the quality of medical care and treatment results. Today, there are many questionnaires PROM, their reliability and validity has been proven in numerous studies. Unified standards and methods for developing and evaluating questionnaires have been developed. Interest in the use of quality of life questionnaires is increasing constantly. However, studies analyzing the data of the PROM questionnaires are rarely found in the national literature. Quality of life is also poorly researched in clinical practice. The aim of the literature review is to present modern methods for assessing the quality of life of patients, especially with cancer. A review of the most widespread and reliable questionnaires and assessment instruments for the quality of life of a patient has been carried out. The analysis of world experience of their use in clinical practice, for patients with cancer has been performed. Examples of both general and specific questionnaires are given. PROM questionnaires are widely used among patients with cancer. However, incorrect use of PROMs is found in the literature, and in patients with certain nosologies PROM data studied poorly. Further analysis of the potential of PROM questionnaires implementation is required, as well as their translation and adaptation for use in Russian health care.
Collapse
|
9
|
Baussard L, Proust-Lima C, Philipps V, Portales F, Ychou M, Mazard T, Cousson-Gélie F. Determinants of Distinct Trajectories of Fatigue in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy for a Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: 6-Month Follow-up Using Growth Mixture Modeling. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:140-150. [PMID: 34161813 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This longitudinal prospective and observational study was designed to identify fatigue trajectories during a 6-month period of chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, and examine the psychosocial factors predicting these trajectories. Associations between fatigue and survival were also investigated. METHODS A total of 169 patients (Mage = 64.36 years, SD = 10.5) reported their fatigue levels every 2 weeks for 6 months. Psychological variables (anxiety, depression, internal control, and coping) were assessed at baseline. A Growth Mixture Model was used to identify latent trajectories of fatigue, and a multinomial logistic regression tested covariate predictors of patients' trajectories. RESULTS Four clinically distinct fatigue trajectories were identified: intense fatigue (6.51%), moderate fatigue (48.52%), no fatigue (33%), and increasing fatigue (11.83%). Fatigue severity was directly associated with overall survival. High depression levels were associated with fatigue severity over time for intense (OR = 1.80 [1.32-2.47]) and for moderate (OR = 1.58 [1.25-2.00]) fatigue, compared to patients reporting no fatigue. Patients who did not report fatigue were better adjusted, and had more resources, such as better internal control over the disease and less emotion-focused coping (guilt and avoidance), than those who reported intense (ORcontrol = 0.77 [0.65-0.92]) or moderate (ORcontrol = 0.89 [0.79-0.99] and ORcoping = 1.13 [1.02-1.24]) fatigue. CONCLUSION Fatigue trajectories differed considerably across patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. This first longitudinal study on colorectal cancer patients involving transactional variables suggests that psychosocial interventions should target these specific outcomes, in order to help patients manage their fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Baussard
- University of Nîmes (L.B.), APSY-V Research Laboratory, Nîmes, France.
| | | | | | - Fabienne Portales
- Digestive Oncology Department (F.P., M.Y., T.M.), Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - Marc Ychou
- Digestive Oncology Department (F.P., M.Y., T.M.), Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - Thibault Mazard
- Digestive Oncology Department (F.P., M.Y., T.M.), Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| | - Florence Cousson-Gélie
- University Paul Valéry Montpellier 3 (F.C.G.), University Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Epidaure Prevention Department (F.C.G.), Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sibert NT, Breidenbach C, Wesselmann S, Schult S, Benz SR, Post S, Seufferlein T, Schloss P, Kowalski C. Which EORTC QLQ-C30 and -CR29 scores are relevant for clinicians for therapy planning and decisions? COLOPROCTOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s00053-021-00560-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
11
|
Breidenbach C, Kowalski C, Wesselmann S, Sibert NT. Could existing infrastructure for using patient-reported outcomes as quality measures also be used for individual care in patients with colorectal cancer? BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:448. [PMID: 33975586 PMCID: PMC8111716 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06457-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There has been increasing interest in integrating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into routine oncological practice. To date, however, PROs have rarely been implemented in Germany. Currently, PROs are being used as performance measures in colorectal cancer centers in Germany. This content analysis identified factors that may inhibit or facilitate the additional use of PROMs for individual patient management. Methods The analysis follows an exploratory approach. Out of 103 centers that participated in a multicentric PRO quality management and benchmarking program in Germany, twelve oncological health-care providers from eight certified colorectal cancer centers were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. The interviewees were clinicians (physicians, nurses, psycho-oncologist and physician assistant) who care for colorectal cancer patients. This analysis evaluated whether and how PROs that are primarily collected for quality management/benchmarking reasons could also be used for the management of individual patients. The data was analyzed using a content-analysis approach. Results The interviewees were not using PRO in their routine clinical work, but they recognized its added value and pointed out potential example uses. Identified inhibiting factors for the use of PROs in clinical routine work were effortful access to PRO reports, lacking coordinating structures, time delays and time points of measurements as well as redundancy with other instruments. Facilitating factors for the use of PROs in clinical routine work that were identified included access via electronic patient records, implementation of coordinating structures for PRO processes in the center, clear PRO reports that are easy to interpret, and measurements at relevant time points. Discussion Clinicians had quite a positive attitude toward PROs and recognized their added value. Inhibiting and facilitating factors of an organizational and technical nature were identified. Conclusions These findings indicate how PROs used for quality management purposes may also be used for the management of individual patients. Therefore, existing structures and processes in the certified colorectal cancer centers, as well as lessons learned from the literature on the implementation of PROs monitoring individual patients need to be taken into account. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06457-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Breidenbach
- German Cancer Society, Kuno-Fischer-Straße 8, 14057, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | - Simone Wesselmann
- German Cancer Society, Kuno-Fischer-Straße 8, 14057, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nora Tabea Sibert
- German Cancer Society, Kuno-Fischer-Straße 8, 14057, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Badaoui S, Kichenadasse G, Rowland A, Sorich MJ, Hopkins AM. Patient-Reported Outcomes Predict Progression-Free Survival of Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer Treated with Abemaciclib. Oncologist 2021; 26:562-568. [PMID: 33914991 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abemaciclib is a CDK4/6 inhibitor used to treat hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. The prognostic value of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been minimally explored for treatment outcomes with CDK4/6 inhibitors. The performance of PROs compared with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study pooled data from single-arm trial, MONARCH 1, and randomized trials, MONARCH 2 and 3. In total, 900 patients initiated abemaciclib and 384 comparator therapy. Pretreatment PRO association with progression-free survival (PFS) was modeled using Cox proportional hazards regression. Prediction performance was assessed via the C-statistic (c). PROs were recorded via the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30. RESULTS Patient-reported physical function, pain, role function, fatigue, and appetite loss were associated with PFS on univariable and adjusted analysis (p < .05). Physical function (c = 0.55) was most predictive, superior to ECOG-PS (c = 0.54), with multivariable analysis indicating both provide independent information (p < .02). In the pooled randomized arms of MONARCH 2 and 3, the PFS treatment benefit (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) of abemaciclib (vs. comparators) was 0.75 (0.57-1.0) for low physical function, compared with 0.48 (0.40-0.59) for intermediate/high (p[interaction] = .01). CONCLUSION PROs were identified as prognostic factors for PFS in patients initiating abemaciclib, with patient-reported physical function containing independent predictive information beyond ECOG-PS. Low physical function was associated with a decrease in the magnitude of PFS benefit from abemaciclib. PROs should be explored as prognostic, predictive, and stratification factors for clinical use and research trials of CDK4/6 inhibitors. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE For the first time, pretreatment patient-reported outcomes have been shown to be independent prognostic markers for progression-free survival (PFS) in patients diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer treated with abemaciclib. Importantly, patients with low physical function had a smaller PFS benefit from abemaciclib (vs. comparator) than patients with intermediate/high physical function. The present study demonstrates patient-reported outcomes as a simple, effective, inexpensive, and independent prognostic marker for patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer treated with abemaciclib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Badaoui
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ganessan Kichenadasse
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Andrew Rowland
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Michael J Sorich
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ashley M Hopkins
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sibert NT, Kowalski C, Pfaff H, Wesselmann S, Breidenbach C. Clinicians' knowledge and attitudes towards patient reported outcomes in colorectal cancer care - insights from qualitative interviews. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:366. [PMID: 33879141 PMCID: PMC8056693 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06361-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can be used in cancer care to monitor patients’ disease-related symptoms and functional status. However, successful implementation of such instruments is only possible if clinical staff are convinced of the clinical benefits. It is therefore crucial to investigate the attitudes of clinical staff to PROs in routine cancer care. Methods Semi-structured, guideline-based interviews were held with 12 clinicians working in certified colorectal cancer centers in Germany who are taking part in an observational study on PROs (five surgeons, two oncologists, one psycho-oncologist, two oncological care nurses, one stoma therapist, and one physician assistant) in order to investigate firstly, how clinicians describe PRO instruments (“wording”); and secondly, the clinicians’ general attitude toward PROs. A qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz was performed. Results The wording used to describe PROs was not consistent. Statements on attitudes toward PROs were very heterogeneous and were therefore categorized into “(rather) positive” and “(rather) negative.” The principal advantages of PROs mentioned by participants included broader, structured knowledge about patients and treatment, as well as relevance for patients. Subcategories for (rather) negative attitudes included statements expressing doubts about the questionnaires and “no need for PROs.” Discussion The clinicians participating mainly expressed fairly positive attitudes toward PROs. However, they had little knowledge about PROs in general and the interviews therefore mainly reflect their expectations and assumptions about them. These initial impressions may be regarded as providing a basis for future implementation strategies and for training of clinicians on how to use PROs in routine cancer care. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06361-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Tabea Sibert
- German Cancer Society, Kuno-Fischer-Straße 8, 14057, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | - Holger Pfaff
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Human Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Eupener Str. 129, 50933, Köln, Germany
| | - Simone Wesselmann
- German Cancer Society, Kuno-Fischer-Straße 8, 14057, Berlin, Germany
| | - Clara Breidenbach
- German Cancer Society, Kuno-Fischer-Straße 8, 14057, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
The association between sarcopenia and quality of life in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: an exploratory study. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:3411-3420. [PMID: 33547963 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06025-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe changes in health-related quality of life (QoL) from before colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery to 1 and 3-month post-surgery in patients diagnosed pre-operatively as sarcopenic or non-sarcopenic by computed tomography (CT) analysis. METHODS Secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study with one pre-operative and two post-operative assessments. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected at each timepoint using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal and the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaires. Pre-operative staging CT scans of the third lumbar vertebra (axial slice) were analysed using Slice-O-Matic Software to determine if patients had CT defined sarcopenia by employing sex-specific threshold values for skeletal muscle index. Patient-reported outcome measure scores were compared with minimal clinical important difference estimates to determine if changes were clinically significant. RESULTS Twenty-five of 40 patients were found to be sarcopenic. The difference between sarcopenic groups on the EQ-5D was medium-sized and clinically significant, with the sarcopenic group reporting lower health status. The non-sarcopenic group displayed a clinically significant reduction in physical wellbeing post-operatively. The sarcopenic group did not demonstrate a clinically important reduction in physical wellbeing. For functional wellbeing, the sarcopenic group recorded a clinically significant reduction at the 1-month timepoint, trending back towards baseline by the 3-month timepoint. The non-sarcopenic group recorded almost no change in functional scores. CONCLUSION This study explored the novel concept of the effect of sarcopenia on QoL in the CRC surgical setting. Clinically significant changes were identified at both post-operative timepoints. This highlights an important proof of concept that PROMs can detect meaningful clinical change in CRC patients in the context of sarcopenia and should be further explored.
Collapse
|
15
|
Rumpold H, Niedersüß-Beke D, Heiler C, Falch D, Wundsam HV, Metz-Gercek S, Piringer G, Thaler J. Prediction of mortality in metastatic colorectal cancer in a real-life population: a multicenter explorative analysis. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:1149. [PMID: 33238958 PMCID: PMC7691098 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07656-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains a lethal disease. Survival, however, is increasing due to a growing number of treatment options. Yet due to the number of prognostic factors and their interactions, prediction of mortality is difficult. The aim of this study is to provide a clinical model supporting prognostication of mCRC mortality in daily practice. METHODS Data from 1104 patients with mCRC in three prospective cancer datasets were used to construct and validate Cox models. Input factors for stepwise backward method variable selection were sex, RAS/BRAF-status, microsatellite status, treatment type (no treatment, systemic treatment with or without resection of metastasis), tumor load, location of primary tumor, metastatic patterns and synchronous or metachronous disease. The final prognostic model for prediction of survival at two and 3 years was validated via bootstrapping to obtain calibration and discrimination C-indices and dynamic time dependent AUC. RESULTS Age, sidedness, number of organs with metastases, lung as only site of metastasis, BRAF mutation status and treatment type were selected for the model. Treatment type had the most prominent influence on survival (resection of metastasis HR 0.26, CI 0.21-0.32; any treatment vs no treatment HR 0.31, CI 0.21-0.32), followed by BRAF mutational status (HR 2.58, CI 1.19-1.59). Validation showed high accuracy with C-indices of 72.2 and 71.4%, and dynamic time dependent AUC's of 76.7 ± 1.53% (both at 2 or 3 years), respectively. CONCLUSION The mCRC mortality prediction model is well calibrated and internally valid. It has the potential to support both, clinical prognostication for treatment decisions and patient communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holger Rumpold
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Ordensklinikum Linz, Seilerstaette 4, 4010, Linz, Austria.
| | | | - Cordula Heiler
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria
| | - David Falch
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Gudrun Piringer
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Hospital Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
| | - Josef Thaler
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Hospital Wels-Grieskirchen, Wels, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ooki A, Morita S, Tsuji A, Iwamoto S, Hara H, Tanioka H, Satake H, Kataoka M, Kotaka M, Kagawa Y, Nakamura M, Shingai T, Ishikawa M, Miyake Y, Suto T, Hashiguchi Y, Yabuno T, Ando M, Sakamoto J, Yamaguchi K. Disagreement between patient- and physician-reported outcomes on symptomatic adverse events as poor prognosis in patients treated with first-line cetuximab plus chemotherapy for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of Phase II QUACK trial. Cancer Med 2020; 9:9419-9430. [PMID: 33222406 PMCID: PMC7774728 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The status and prognostic value of the disagreement between physician and patient assessments of symptomatic adverse events (AEs) remain unclear for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first‐line cetuximab plus chemotherapy. Paired data on patient‐reported outcomes using the EORTC QLQ‐C30 and physician‐reported outcomes using the NCI‐CTCAE for eight symptomatic AEs (fatigue, pain, insomnia, dyspnea, constipation, appetite loss, nausea/vomiting, and diarrhea) were collected from a prospective trial assessing the relationships between treatment efficacy, AEs, and quality of life. The overall agreement rates between patient and physician reporting at 4 weeks ranged from 40.2% to 76.5% for 129 patients. The level of agreement based on Cohen's κ statistics was slight to poor for dyspnea, pain, fatigue, and insomnia, while it was moderate to fair for the remaining AEs. No clinicopathological characteristics of disagreement were found. The underreporting by physicians ranged from 12.5% (nausea/vomiting) to 56.7% (fatigue). The 2‐year overall survival (OS) rate was more favorable for patients with high agreement than for those with low agreement (71.2% vs. 46.5%, p = .016), and the agreement status was an independent factor of OS (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.13–4.71; p = .022). For patients who were reported as asymptomatic by the physician, the presence of patient‐reported symptoms resulted in a trend toward poor prognostic outcomes for appetite loss, dyspnea, diarrhea, and constipation. These findings provide the clinical importance of the monitoring of patient‐reported symptoms that can be complementary to physician‐reported data to ensure more accurate clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Ooki
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Morita
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Akihito Tsuji
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kagawa University, Kita, Japan
| | - Shigeyoshi Iwamoto
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University Kouri Hospital, Neyagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroki Hara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Tanioka
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Hironaga Satake
- Cancer Treatment Center, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masato Kataoka
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | | | - Masato Nakamura
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Shingai
- Department of Surgery, Osaka Saiseikai Senri Hospital, Suita, Japan
| | - Masashi Ishikawa
- Department of Surgery, Shikoku Central Hospital, Shikokuchuo, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Miyake
- Department of Surgery, Osaka Minato Central Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takeshi Suto
- Department of Surgery, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Yojiro Hashiguchi
- Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taichi Yabuno
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Masahiko Ando
- Department of Advanced Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | - Kensei Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kim HS, Courtney DM, McCarthy DM, Cella D. Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Emergency Care Research: A Primer for Researchers, Peer Reviewers, and Readers. Acad Emerg Med 2020; 27:403-418. [PMID: 31945245 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Revised: 01/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are of increasing importance in clinical research because they capture patients' experience with well-being, illness, and their interactions with health care. Because PROs tend to focus on specific symptoms (e.g., pain, anxiety) or general assessments of patient functioning and quality of life that offer unique advantages compared to traditional clinical outcomes (e.g., mortality, emergency department revisits), emergency care researchers may benefit from incorporation of PRO measures into their research design as a primary or secondary outcome. Patients may also benefit from the ability of PROs to inform clinical practice and facilitate patient decision making, as PROs are obtained directly from the lived experience of other patients with similar conditions or health status. This review article introduces and defines key terminology relating to PROs, discusses reasons for utilizing PROs in clinical research, outlines basic psychometric and practical assessments that can be used to select a specific PRO measure, and highlights examples of commonly utilized PRO measures in emergency care research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard S. Kim
- Department of Emergency Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL
- Center for Health Services & Outcomes Research Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL
| | - D. Mark Courtney
- Department of Emergency Medicine University of Texas Southwestern Medical School Dallas TX
| | - Danielle M. McCarthy
- Department of Emergency Medicine Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL
- Center for Health Services & Outcomes Research Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL
- Center for Patient‐Centered Outcomes Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rutherford C, Müller F, Faiz N, King MT, White K. Patient-reported outcomes and experiences from the perspective of colorectal cancer survivors: meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2020; 4:27. [PMID: 32335745 PMCID: PMC7183519 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-020-00195-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is prevalent in the developed world. Favourable survival rates highlight the need to better understand CRC survivors' experiences of long-term impacts of treatment, which can in turn inform decision making. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesise CRC survivors' experiences of long-term impacts on health-related quality of life. METHODS We searched Medline, Embase and PsychINFO from inception to January 2019. Qualitative studies describing CRC survivors' experiences at least 1-year post-treatment were included. Study eligibility, quality assessment (COREQ guidelines), and data synthesis was performed independently by two reviewers and discussed with the study team. RESULTS Of 1363 papers retrieved, 20 reporting 15 studies met eligibility. Thematic synthesis produced 12 themes: symptoms, physical, social, psychological and sexual functioning, impact on relationships, informal care needs provided by family/friend, supportive care needs provided by healthcare professional, health care experiences, health behaviour, financial toxicity and occupational experiences. Stoma problems (e.g. leakage, skin irritation) were common in ostomates. Survivors with no/reversed stoma experienced unexpected, long-term altered and unpredictable bowel functioning. Survivors often regulated timing, amount and foods consumed to manage bowel functioning. Less common symptoms included fatigue, impaired sleep and anal pain. Stoma problems and altered bowel functioning impaired survivors' physical, social, sexual and psychological functioning. Cognitive functioning and heredity issues were not reported in any paper. CONCLUSION CRC survivors experience ongoing symptoms and functioning impairments more than 1-year post-treatment completion. Many survivors find their own ways to manage symptoms rather than seek professional help. Follow-up care for CRC survivors should integrate screening for long-term effects and provide targeted supportive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Rutherford
- The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Quality of Life Office, Faculty of Science, Sydney, Australia.
- The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cancer Nursing Research Unit (CNRU), Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Fabiola Müller
- The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Quality of Life Office, Faculty of Science, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nasiba Faiz
- The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cancer Nursing Research Unit (CNRU), Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Madeleine T King
- The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Quality of Life Office, Faculty of Science, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kate White
- The University of Sydney, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cancer Nursing Research Unit (CNRU), Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|