1
|
Saha P, Cady-McCrea C, Puvanesarajah V, Mesfin A. Patient-Reported Outcomes for Spine Oncology: A Narrative Review. World Neurosurg 2024; 185:165-170. [PMID: 38364898 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
Spine tumors, both primary and metastatic, impose significant morbidity and mortality on patients and physicians. Patient-reported outcomes are valuable tools to assess a patient's impression of their health status and enhance communication between physicians and patients. Various spine generic patient-reported outcome tools have traditionally been used but have not been validated in the spine tumor patient population. The Spine Oncology Study Group Outcome Questionnaire, which is disease-specific for the metastatic spine patient population, has been shown to have strong validity, even across multiple languages. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, which has recently been developed, employs computerized adaptive testing to assess multiple health domains. It has been shown to capture information in both generic and specific questionnaires and has the potential to be used as a universal tool in the spine oncology patient population. Further long-term studies, as well as, cross-cultural adaptations, are needed to validate Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System's applicability and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Clarke Cady-McCrea
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Physical Performance, School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Varun Puvanesarajah
- Medstar Orthopaedic Institute, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Addisu Mesfin
- Medstar Orthopaedic Institute, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sansatan R, Kanlayanaphotporn R, Jensen MP, Correia H, Janwantanakul P. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Thai version of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system short form- depression 8a in individuals with chronic low back pain. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2024; 8:27. [PMID: 38436802 PMCID: PMC10912068 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00702-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study aimed to cross-culturally adapt the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Form v1.0 - Depression 8a (PROMIS SF v1.0 - Depression 8a) into Thai and evaluate its psychometric properties in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS The PROMIS SF v1.0- Depression 8a was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Thai using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy translation methodology. Two hundred and sixty-nine individuals with CLBP completed the Thai version of PROMIS SF v1.0- Depression 8a (T-PROMIS-D-8a) scale and a set of measures assessing validity criterion domains. Structural validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability at a 7-day interval of the T-PROMIS-D-8a scale were computed and its construct validity was evaluated by computing correlations with the Thai version of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (T-PHQ-9), Numeric Rating Scale of pain intensity (T-NRS), and Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (T-FABQ). RESULTS Data from 269 participants were analyzed. Most participants were women (70%), and the sample had a mean age of 42.5 (SD 16.6) years. The findings supported the unidimensionality, internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94), and test-retest reliability (ICC [2,1] = 0.86) of the T-PROMIS-D-8a. A floor effect was observed for 16% of the sample. Associations with the T-PHQ-9, T-NRS, and T-FABQ supported the construct validity of the T-PROMIS-D-8a. CONCLUSIONS The T-PROMIS-D-8a was successfully translated and culturally adapted. The findings indicated that the scale is reliable and valid for assessing depression in Thai individuals with CLBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruetaichanok Sansatan
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Rotsalai Kanlayanaphotporn
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Mark P Jensen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Helena Correia
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Prawit Janwantanakul
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nagy Z, Kiss N, Szigeti M, Áfra J, Lekka N, Misik F, Mucsi I, Banczerowski P. Construct validity of the Hungarian Version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 Profile Among Patients with Low Back Pain. World Neurosurg 2024; 181:e55-e66. [PMID: 37385441 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.06.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aim to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Hungarian version of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS)-29 profile domains among patients with chronic low back pain. METHODS We used a convenience, cross-sectional sampling of patients recruited at our neurosurgical institution. The participants completed paper-pencil version of the PROMIS-29 profile in addition to validated legacy questionnaires, including the Oswestry disability index, Research and Development Corporation 36-item short-form survey, 7-item general anxiety disorder scale, 9-item patient health questionnaire. Reliability was evaluated by calculating the internal consistency (Cronbach's α). Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. The structural validity of PROMIS-29 was assessed using a confirmatory factor analysis. Construct validity was assessed by evaluating convergent and discriminant validity using Spearman's rank correlation. To further corroborate the construct validity, we also performed known-group comparisons. RESULTS The mean age of the 131 participants was 54 ± 16 years. Of the 131 patients, 62% were women. The internal consistency of each PROMIS domain was high (Cronbach's α >0.89 for all). The test-retest reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation >0.97). The confirmatory factor analysis showed good structural validity (comparative fit index >0.96; standardized root mean square residual <0.026 for all domains). All measured PROMIS scores correlated strongly with the scores obtained using the corresponding primary legacy instrument, indicating excellent convergent validity. The known-group comparisons demonstrated differences as hypothesized. CONCLUSIONS We present data supporting the validity and reliability of the Hungarian PROMIS-29 profile short forms for patients with low back pain. This instrument will be useful for research and clinical applications in spine care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoltán Nagy
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Neurosurgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Nóra Kiss
- Department of Neurosurgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Mátyás Szigeti
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Physiological Controls Research Center, Obuda University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Judit Áfra
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Norbert Lekka
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ferenc Misik
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health, Budapest, Hungary
| | - István Mucsi
- Ajmera Transplant Center, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Nephrology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Péter Banczerowski
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Neurosurgery, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Terwee CB, Roorda LD. Country-specific reference values for PROMIS ® pain, physical function and participation measures compared to US reference values. Ann Med 2023; 55:1-11. [PMID: 36426680 PMCID: PMC9704075 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2149849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) is commonly used across medical conditions. To facilitate interpretation of scores across countries, we calculated Dutch reference values for PROMIS Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), Pain Behavior (PROMIS-PB), Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-APSRA), and Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities (PROMIS-SSRA), as compared to US reference values. PATIENTS AND METHODS A panel completed full PROMIS-PF (n=1310), PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PB (n=1052), and PROMIS-APSRA and PROMIS-SSRA (n=1002) item banks and reported their level of health per domain (no, mild, moderate, severe limitations). T-scores were calculated by sample and subgroups (age, gender, self-reported level of domain). Distribution-based and anchor-based thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe scores were determined. RESULTS Mean T-scores were close to the US mean of 50 for PROMIS-PF (49.8) and PROMIS-APSRA (50.6), lower for PROMIS-SSRA (47.5) and higher for PROMIS-PI (54.9) and PROMIS-PB (52.0). Distribution-based thresholds for mild, moderate, and severe scores were comparable to US recommended cut-off values (except for PROMIS-PI) but participants reported limitations 'earlier' than suggested thresholds. CONCLUSION Dutch reference values were close to US reference values for some PROMIS domains but not all. We recommend country-specific reference values to facilitate worldwide PROMIS use.KEY MESSAGESPROMIS offers universally applicable IRT-based efficient and patient-friendly measures to assess commonly relevant patient-reported outcomes across medical conditions.To support the use of PROMIS in daily clinical practice and research across the world, country-specific general population reference values should be obtained.More research is necessary to obtain reliable and valid cut-off values for what constitutes mild, moderate and severe scores from the patients' perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leo D Roorda
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center
- Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Oskouie IM, Rostami M, Moosavi M, Zarei M, Jouibari MF, Ataie H, Jafarieh A, Moghadam N, Kordi R, Khadivi M, Mazloumi A. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of selected PROMIS measures for use in lumbar canal stenosis patients. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION 2023; 12:99. [PMID: 37288413 PMCID: PMC10243446 DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_668_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Institutes of Health (NIH) developed a new measurement system called the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) which can be used for multiple health conditions. The 29-item short form (PROMIS-29) with seven domains was more often used by clinical researchers to measure the physical function, mood and sleeping status of patients with low back pain (LBP). Translation of the PROMIS into multiple languages and adaptation of its application in different cultural diversities can help to further standardize clinical research studies and make them comparable to each other. This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt the PROMIS-29 into Persian (P-PROMIS-29) and evaluate the construct validity and reliability of the translated questionnaire among patients with lumbar canal stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS The translation was conducted by using the multilingual translation methodology guideline. Construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability at a two-week interval for the P-PROMIS-29 were calculated. Construct validity was assessed by calculating correlations between the P-PROMIS-29 with Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Roland-Morris results. RESULTS The study sample included 70 participants with lumbar canal stenosis. Internal consistencies were moderate to good with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.2 to 0.94. The test-retest reliability evaluation was excellent with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from 0.885 to 0.986. Construct validity of different domains of P-PROMIS-29 were moderate to good, with Pearson's correlation coefficient results ranging from 0.223 to 0.749. CONCLUSION Our results showed that P-PROMIS-29 is a valid and reliable measurement tool for evaluation of patients with lumbar canal stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iman M. Oskouie
- Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohsen Rostami
- Spine Center of Excellence, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mersad Moosavi
- Spine Center of Excellence, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Zarei
- Spine Center of Excellence, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Imam Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Morteza Faghih Jouibari
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hosienali Ataie
- Department of Anesthesiology, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Arash Jafarieh
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amiralam Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Navid Moghadam
- Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ramin Kordi
- Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Spine Center of Excellence, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Masoud Khadivi
- Spine Center of Excellence, Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Adel Mazloumi
- Department of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hungarian PROMIS-29+2: psychometric properties and population reference values. Qual Life Res 2023:10.1007/s11136-023-03364-7. [PMID: 36792819 PMCID: PMC9931172 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-023-03364-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to assess psychometric properties of the Hungarian PROMIS-29+2 profile measure and provide general population reference values for Hungary. METHODS An adult general population sample (n = 1700) completed PROMIS-29+2 v2.1 in an online survey. The following psychometric properties were assessed: floor and ceiling effect, convergent validity with SF-36v1 domains, internal consistency (McDonald's omega), unidimensionality, local independence, monotonicity, graded response model (GRM) fit and differential item functioning (DIF). Age- and gender-specific reference values were established using the US item calibrations. RESULTS Depending on scale orientation, high floor or ceiling effects were observed for all domains (25.2-60.7%) except for sleep disturbance. McDonald's omega for domains ranged from 0.87-0.97. Unidimensionality, local independence and monotonicity were supported and the GRM adequately fitted for all but one domains. The sleep disturbance domain demonstrated item misfit, response level disordering and low discrimination ability, particularly for item Sleep116 ('refreshing sleep'). Strong correlations were observed between PROMIS-29+2 and corresponding SF-36 domains (rs=│0.60│ to │0.78│). No DIF was detected for most sociodemographic characteristics. Problems with physical function, pain interference and social roles tended to increase, whereas problems with anxiety, depression, fatigue and cognitive function declined with age (p < 0.01). In all domains except for cognitive function, more health problems occurred in females than in males (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The Hungarian PROMIS-29+2 shows satisfactory psychometric properties; however, the sleep disturbance domain substantially underperforms that requires further attention. Population reference values were generated that facilitate the interpretation of health outcomes in various patient populations.
Collapse
|
7
|
Orbai AM, Coates LC, Deodhar A, Helliwell PS, Ritchlin CT, Leibowitz E, Kollmeier AP, Hsia EC, Xu XL, Sheng S, Jiang Y, Liu Y, Han C. Meaningful Improvement in General Health Outcomes with Guselkumab Treatment for Psoriatic Arthritis: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 Results from a Phase 3 Study. THE PATIENT 2022; 15:657-668. [PMID: 35768650 PMCID: PMC9584870 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-022-00588-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Phase 3 DISCOVER-1 study of guselkumab is the first randomized controlled trial to use Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures to assess the effects of treatment on general health outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS Patients (N = 381) with active PsA were randomized 1:1:1 to guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); guselkumab 100 mg at Week 0, Week 4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W); or placebo with Week 24 crossover to guselkumab Q4W. The PROMIS-29 Profile contains four items for each of seven domains (anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and social participation) and one pain-intensity item. Raw domain scores are converted to standardized T-scores, with norms based on a US general population mean of 50 (1 standard deviation (SD) = 10). T-score changes of ≥ 5 are considered clinically meaningful. Least-squares mean PROMIS-29 T-score changes from baseline to Week 24 and Week 52 were summarized for the guselkumab and placebo groups; nominal p-values comparing results between guselkumab and placebo were calculated at Week 24 using a mixed model for repeated measures. The proportions of patients who achieved clinically meaningful improvement in PROMIS-29 T-scores were also summarized at Week 24 and Week 52; nominal p-values comparing results between guselkumab and placebo were calculated at Week 24 using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. RESULTS In the DISCOVER-1 patient population, mean PROMIS-29 T-scores at baseline were ~ 1 SD worse for physical function and pain interference and were numerically worse for social participation, fatigue, and sleep disturbance compared with the US general population. At Week 24, mean PROMIS-29 T-scores improved in guselkumab-treated patients, approaching US population norms; T-scores continued to improve through Week 52. Significantly higher proportions of patients in both guselkumab treatment arms (31-52% across domains) had clinically meaningful improvements in pain interference, fatigue, physical function, sleep, and social participation at Week 24 versus placebo (all nominal p ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION In patients with active PsA, guselkumab treatment provided clinically meaningful reductions in fatigue and pain and improvement in physical function and social participation, as measured by the PROMIS-29 Profile. These improvements were maintained through 1 year. CLINICALTRIALS GOV: Registration number, NCT03162796; Submission date 19 May 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana-Maria Orbai
- Psoriatic Arthritis Program, Johns Hopkins Arthritis Center, Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Avenue Baltimore, MFL Center Tower Suite 4100, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
| | - Laura C Coates
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Atul Deodhar
- Division of Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Philip S Helliwell
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Christopher T Ritchlin
- Department of Medicine, Allergy/Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | | | - Alexa P Kollmeier
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Hsia
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
- University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Xie L Xu
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Shihong Sheng
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Yusang Jiang
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
- Cytel, Inc., Chesterbrook, PA, USA
| | - Yan Liu
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Chenglong Han
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wuttge DM, Chaplin JE, Sandqvist G. Validation of the Swedish version of PROMIS-29v2 and FACIT-Dyspnea Index in patients with systemic sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2022:1-9. [PMID: 36129325 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2096124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity of the Swedish versions of PROMIS-29 and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Dyspnea (FACIT-Dyspnea) instruments in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS In a cross-sectional study, consecutive SSc patients completed a paper-based survey. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was tested employing weighted Kappa (Kw) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct validity was evaluated by hypotheses testing using RAND-36, MRC Dyspnea score, Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) and clinical measurements. RESULTS Forty-nine patients (86% female; 73% limited cutaneous SSc) completed the survey. The mean disease duration was 11 years and mean SHAQ was 0.5. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were good with the exception of PROMIS-29 anxiety. PROMIS-29, FACIT-Dyspnea, and Functional limitation showed strong correlations to corresponding RAND-36 domains (|rs|=0.67 to -0.85). Relevant PROMIS-29 domains, FACIT-Dyspnea and Functional limitation correlated strongly to SHAQ and VAS overall disease severity (|rs|=0.60 to -0.75). Ceiling effects (>15%) were found in six PROMIS-29 domains and in both FACIT-Dyspnea and Functional limitations. Four (4/5) hypotheses were confirmed. CONCLUSIONS PROMIS-29 and FACIT-Dyspnea meet the requirements for reliability and have adequate construct validity in Swedish patients with SSc.Implications for rehabilitationPROMIS-29v2 and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Dyspnea (FACIT-Dyspnea) Index are patient outcome measures that gain increasing interest for the evaluation of patient with rheumatologic diseases.PROMIS-29v2 and FACIT-Dyspnea Index meet the requirements for reliability and have adequate construct validity compared to legacy measures in Swedish patients with systemic sclerosis.Translation and validation of PROMs is important for studies of rare diseases in multi-center collaborations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk M Wuttge
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Rheumatology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - John E Chaplin
- Institution of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Gunnel Sandqvist
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Rheumatology, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cai T, Wu F, Huang Q, Yu C, Yang Y, Ni F, Yuan C. Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System adult profile-57 (PROMIS-57). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2022; 20:95. [PMID: 35706033 PMCID: PMC9202169 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-022-01997-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The PROMIS-57 is a commonly used self-reported instrument to solve the lack of generalizable and universal measures required to evaluate common symptoms and functions from patients’ perspectives. This study aimed to translate the PROMIS-57 into Chinese and psychometrically test the translated instrument on patients with breast cancer. Methods Translation, cross‑cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the instrument were performed from June 2020 to June 2021. Eligible patients were recruited and completed the PROMIS-57, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), and a sociodemographic questionnaire. Results Data from 602 patients with a mean age of 48.83 years were analyzed. Most domains in the PROMIS-57 showed an absence of floor and ceiling effects. Multi-trait scaling analysis demonstrated acceptable convergent and discriminant validity. The correlations between the PROMIS-57 scores and the selected FACT-B scores supported the criterion validity via the Pearson correlation test. Measurement invariance was supported by the absence of differential item functioning for most items. Cronbach’s α of the domains ranged from 0.85–0.95. The unidimensional factor structure of all domains was supported using confirmatory factor analyses. Additionally, most items showed acceptable item information curves and item characteristics curve matrices. Conclusion The Chinese version of the PROMIS-57 was found to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing common symptoms and functions among patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Cai
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Fulei Wu
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Qingmei Huang
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Chunfang Yu
- Department of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guangxi, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Feixia Ni
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Changrong Yuan
- School of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Huang W, Wu Q, Zhang Y, Tian C, Huang H, Huang S, Zhou Y, He J, Wang H. Preliminary evaluation of the Chinese version of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system 29-item profile in patients with aortic dissection. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2022; 20:94. [PMID: 35701761 PMCID: PMC9195330 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-022-02000-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29-item Profile (PROMIS-29) has been widely used to measure health outcomes from the patient's perspective. It has not been validated in adults with aortic disease. The aim of this study was to explore the reliability and validity of the Chinese PROMIS-29 among patients undergoing surgery for aortic dissection (AD). METHODS A cross-sectional design was applied. Eligible patients completed a questionnaire that contained the PROMIS-29 and legacy measures, including the Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12), 8-item Somatic Symptom Scale (SSS-8), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 (GAD-2), and Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2). The structural validity of the PROMIS-29 was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Reliability was evaluated with Cronbach's α. Construct validity was assessed by calculating Spearman's rank correlations and comparing known-group differences. RESULTS In total, a sample of 327 AD patients was included in the final analysis. Most of them were male (89%) with a mean age of 52.7 (± 10.3). CFA revealed good model fit of the seven-factor structure within PROMIS-29, as well as most domains in single-factor analysis. Reliability was confirmed with Cronbach's α > 0.90. Correlations between comparable domains of the PROMIS-29 and those of legacy questionnaires and most know-group comparisons were observed as hypothesized. CONCLUSIONS This study found evidence for acceptable structural validity, construct validity and internal consistency of the PROMIS-29 in a sample of AD patients. It can be applied to AD survivors by researchers or clinicians, measuring outcomes after surgery and identifying those with worse health status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanbing Huang
- Department of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jie Fang Avenue 1095, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, China.,School of Nursing, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hangkong Road 13, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Qiansheng Wu
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jie Fang Avenue 1095, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Yufen Zhang
- School of Nursing, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hangkong Road 13, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Chong Tian
- School of Nursing, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hangkong Road 13, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Haishan Huang
- Department of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jie Fang Avenue 1095, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Sufang Huang
- Department of Emergency, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jie Fang Avenue 1095, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Yanrong Zhou
- Department of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jie Fang Avenue 1095, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Jing He
- School of Nursing, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hangkong Road 13, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, China
| | - Hui Wang
- Department of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jie Fang Avenue 1095, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Garratt AM, Coste J, Rouquette A, Valderas JM. The Norwegian PROMIS-29: psychometric validation in the general population for Norway. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2021; 5:86. [PMID: 34499288 PMCID: PMC8427163 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-021-00357-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System profile instruments include “high information” items drawn from large item banks following the application of modern psychometric criteria. The shortest adult profile, PROMIS-29, looks set to replace existing short-form instruments in research and clinical practice. The objective of this study was to undertake the first psychometric evaluation of the Norwegian PROMIS-29, following a postal survey of a random sample of 12,790 Norwegians identified through the National Registry of the Norwegian Tax Administration. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess structural validity. Fit to the Rasch partial credit model and differential item functioning (DIF) were assessed in relation to age, gender, and education. PROMIS-29 scores were compared to those for the EQ-5D-5L and the Self-assessed Comorbidity Questionnaire (SCQ), for purposes of assessing validity based on a priori hypotheses. Results There were 3200 (25.9%) respondents with a mean age (SD) of 51 (20.7, range 18 to 97 years) and 55% were female. The PROMIS-29 showed satisfactory structural validity and acceptable fit to Rasch model including unidimensionality, and measurement invariance across age and education levels. One pain interference item had uniform DIF for gender but splitting gave satisfactory fit. Domain reliability estimates ranged from 0.85 to 0.95. Correlations between PROMIS-29 domain, SCQ and EQ-5D scores were largely as expected, the largest being for scores assessing very similar aspects of health. Conclusions The Norwegian version of the PROMIS-29 is a reliable and valid generic self-reported measure of health in the Norwegian general population. The instrument is recommended for further application, but the analysis should be replicated and responsiveness to change assessed in future studies before it can be recommended for clinical and health services evaluation in Norway. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-021-00357-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Garratt
- Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Post Box 4404, 0403, Nydalen, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Joël Coste
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Unit, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP, 27 rue du faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014, Paris, France.,Paris University, 75014, Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Rouquette
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, 75014, Paris, France.,Public Health and Epidemiology Department, AP-HP Paris-Saclay, 94276, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre Cedex, France
| | - José M Valderas
- Health Services and Policy Research Group (HSPRG), Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care (APEx), and NIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.,Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Terwee CB, Zuidgeest M, Vonkeman HE, Cella D, Haverman L, Roorda LD. Common patient-reported outcomes across ICHOM Standard Sets: the potential contribution of PROMIS®. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21:259. [PMID: 34488730 PMCID: PMC8420145 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01624-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) develops condition-specific Standard Sets of outcomes to be measured in clinical practice for value-based healthcare evaluation. Standard Sets are developed by different working groups, which is inefficient and may lead to inconsistencies in selected PROs and PROMs. We aimed to identify common PROs across ICHOM Standard Sets and examined to what extend these PROs can be measured with a generic set of PROMs: the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®). METHODS We extracted all PROs and recommended PROMs from 39 ICHOM Standard Sets. Similar PROs were categorized into unique PRO concepts. We examined which of these PRO concepts can be measured with PROMIS. RESULTS A total of 307 PROs were identified in 39 ICHOM Standard Sets and 114 unique PROMs are recommended for measuring these PROs. The 307 PROs could be categorized into 22 unique PRO concepts. More than half (17/22) of these PRO concepts (covering about 75% of the PROs and 75% of the PROMs) can be measured with a PROMIS measure. CONCLUSION Considerable overlap was found in PROs across ICHOM Standard Sets, and large differences in terminology used and PROMs recommended, even for the same PROs. We recommend a more universal and standardized approach to the selection of PROs and PROMs. Such an approach, focusing on a set of core PROs for all patients, measured with a system like PROMIS, may provide more opportunities for patient-centered care and facilitate the uptake of Standard Sets in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Harald E Vonkeman
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
| | - Lotte Haverman
- Psychosocial Department, Emma Children's Hospital Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leo D Roorda
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Khutok K, Janwantanakul P, Jensen MP, Kanlayanaphotporn R. Responsiveness of the PROMIS-29 Scales in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2021; 46:107-113. [PMID: 33347091 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE To evaluate responsiveness and estimate the minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) scales in individuals with chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The PROMIS-29 questionnaire assesses seven health-related quality-of-life domains. However, research to evaluate the responsiveness and MCIDs of the PROMS-29 scores in individuals with low back pain is limited. METHODS The study was conducted in physical therapy clinics in Thailand, using validated Thai versions of the study measures. One hundred and eighty-three individuals with chronic low back pain completed the PROMIS-29 at baseline and at 4-weeks follow-up. Perceived change in each domain assessed by the PROMIS-29 scales was assessed at 4 weeks using a 7-point measure of Global Perceived Effect (GPE). Responsiveness of the PROMIS-29 scale scores was evaluated by examining the effect sizes, the standardized response means (SRMs) for change over time, and examining these as a function of the GPE ratings. MCIDs for the scales were estimated by computing a half a standard deviation (SD) and standard error of measurement statistic for each scale. RESULTS The mean change scores, effect sizes, and SRMs increased as a function of the GPE ratings. Significant differences in change scores between those who reported that they were very much improved and those who did not improve were found for the PROMIS-29 Pain Intensity, Physical Function, and Anxiety scales. The correlations between changes scores and GPE ratings were mostly weak in magnitude. The MCID estimates computed as 0.50 of a SD unit and as a standard error of measurement showed similar values. CONCLUSION The PROMIS-29 scale scores assessing pain intensity, physical function, and anxiety evidenced the most responsivity in the study sample. The results, when considered in light of the findings from other investigators, support 5.0 points as a reasonable MCID for most of the PROMIS-29 scales. Further studies are needed to determine the generalizability of the findings.Level of Evidence: 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kornkanok Khutok
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Prawit Janwantanakul
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Mark P Jensen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Rotsalai Kanlayanaphotporn
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Björk M, Bergström M, Sverker A, Brodin N. Measures of Participation in Persons With Musculoskeletal Conditions. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 72 Suppl 10:486-498. [PMID: 33091247 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M Björk
- Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - M Bergström
- Linköping University, Norrköping Campus, Norrköping, Sweden
| | - A Sverker
- Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - N Brodin
- Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden, and Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|