Diabetes mellitus induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: type 1 diabetes variant or new clinical entity? Review of the literature

Immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced diabetes mellitus (review)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become extensively utilized in the early-stage treatment of various cancers, offering additional therapeutic possibilities for patients with advanced cancer. However, certain patient populations are susceptible to experiencing toxic adverse effects from ICIs, such as thyrotoxicosis, rashes, among others. Specifically, ICIDM, induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors, exhibits characteristics similar to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, T1DM). ICIDM is characterized by a rapid onset and may coincide with severe ketoacidosis. Despite a favorable response to insulin therapy, patients typically require lifelong insulin dependence. After discussing the autoimmune adverse effects and the specifics of ICIs-induced diabetes mellitus (ICIDM), it is important to note that certain patient populations are particularly susceptible to experiencing toxic adverse effects from ICIs. Specifically, ICIDM, which is triggered by immune checkpoint inhibitors, mirrors the characteristics of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, T1DM). This article conducts an in-depth analysis of the literature to explore the pathogenesis, disease progression, and treatment strategies applicable to diabetes induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIDM).

HLA investigation in ICI-induced T1D and isolated ACTH deficiency including meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer treatment has led to an increase in the number of reported cases of immunotherapy-related endocrinopathies. This study aimed to analyze and compare human leukocyte antigen (HLA) signatures associated with ICI-induced type 1 diabetes (ICI-T1D) and isolated adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency (ICI-IAD) in patients with both conditions.

METHODS

HLA signatures were examined for their frequencies of occurrence in 22 patients with ICI-T1D without concurrent IAD, including 16 patients from nationwide reports (ICI-T1D group) and 14 patients with ICI-IAD without concurrent T1D (ICI-IAD group). The HLA signatures were also compared for their respective frequencies in 11 patients with ICI-T1D and ICI-IAD, including eight from nationwide reports (ICI-T1D/IAD group).

RESULTS

In the ICI-T1D group, HLA-DRB1*09:01-DQB1*03:03 and DQA1*03:02, which are in linkage disequilibrium with DRB1*09:01-DQB1*03:03 and DRB1*13:02-DQB1*06:04, were susceptible to ICI-T1D, whereas DRB1*15:02-DQB1*06:01 was protective against ICI-T1D. In the ICI-IAD group, DPB1*09:01, C*12:02-B*52:01, and DRB1*15:02-DRB1*06:01, which are in strong linkage disequilibrium, were associated with susceptibility to ICI-IAD. Moreover, DRB1*15:02-DRB1*06:01 was not detected in the ICI-T1D/IAD group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed specific HLA signatures associated with ICI-T1D and ICI-IAD. Moreover, HLA-DRB1*15:02-DRB1*06:01, an ICI-IAD-susceptible HLA haplotype, coincides with the ICI-T1D-protective HLA haplotype, suggesting that the presence of DRB1*15:02-DRB1*06:01 may protect against the co-occurrence of T1D in patients with ICI-IAD.

For the Long Haul: Management of Long-Term Survivors after Melanoma Systemic Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes the latest advancements in survivorship care for patients with advanced melanoma who received systemic therapy and emphasizes the areas where more research is needed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the last decade there have been remarkable advances in the treatment of advanced and metastatic melanoma. Due to these novel treatments, including several immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors, there are and will continue to be increasing numbers of long-term melanoma survivors who have been treated with systemic therapy. These patients will navigate new challenges are they are essentially among the first long term survivors after these novel therapies. Survivorship care focuses on improving the health-related quality of life of patients including the physical, emotional, social and functional effects of cancer that begin at diagnosis and continue through the end of life. Survivorship also includes screening for cancer recurrence and second cancers. As the number of melanoma survivors who received systemic therapy continues to grow, the survivorship care plan will become increasingly important for optimal care of patients even after their cancer treatments. Understanding the many domains of survivorship care for this group of patients is imperative for their care now and to identify unmet needs for future research.

Case report: Strong GAD antibody positivity and type 1 diabetes-HLA-susceptible haplotype-DRB1*04:05-DQB1*04:01 in a Japanese patient with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced type 1 diabetes

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in cancer treatment; however, they can lead to immune-related adverse events, including immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus (ICI-T1DM). While fulminant T1DM is common in East Asia, ICI-T1DM has predominantly been reported in Western countries. In this report, we present the case of a 66-year-old Japanese man with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing dialysis for diabetic nephropathy. The patient was diagnosed with left upper lobe lung cancer, and treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab was initiated. After 48 days, the patient experienced impaired consciousness and difficulty moving. His blood glucose levels were 815 mg/dL, and metabolic acidosis was detected, leading to a diagnosis of diabetic ketoacidosis. The patient was subsequently treated with continuous intravenous insulin. However, his C-peptide levels rapidly depleted, and new-onset ICI-T1DM was diagnosed. Although most Japanese patients with ICI-T1DM test negative for glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibodies, this case exhibited a strong positivity. Thus, we reviewed the literature on 15 similar Japanese cases, revealing a mean HbA1c level at onset of 8.7% and a mean time from ICI administration to onset of 9.7 weeks, which was shorter than that in GAD-negative cases. Moreover, human leukocyte antigen typing revealed five cases of DRB1*04:05-DQB1*04:01, including the present case, and one case of DRB1*09:01-DQB1*03:03, both of which were susceptible to T1DM haplotypes. These findings suggest that GAD antibody positivity may be associated with acute onset and disease progression in some cases of Japanese patients with ICI-T1DM. Given that the prediction of new-onset ICI-T1DM is challenging, monitoring GAD antibody levels might be useful. However, further studies with large sample sizes and validation across different racial and ethnic populations are warranted.

Effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor associated endocrinopathies on cancer survival

Objectives

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), of which endocrinopathies are common. We characterized endocrine and non-endocrine irAEs in cancer patients receiving ICIs, identified risk factors for their development and established whether endocrine and non-endocrine irAEs were differentially associated with improved cancer prognosis.

Design and methods

Single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors receiving at least one ICI treatment cycle (242 men, 151 women, median age 65 years). Main outcome measures were incidence of any irAE during the study period, overall survival and time to treatment failure.

Results

Non-endocrine irAEs occurred in 32% and endocrine irAEs in 12% of patients. Primary thyroid dysfunction was the most common endocrine irAE (9.5%) and the majority of endocrinopathies required permanent hormone replacement. Women had an increased risk of developing endocrine irAEs (p = 0.017). The biggest survival advantage occurred in patients who developed both endocrine and non-endocrine irAEs (overall survival: HR 0.16, CI 0.09-0.28). Time to treatment failure was also significantly improved in patients who developed endocrine irAEs (HR 0.49, CI 0.34 - 0.71) or both (HR 0.41, CI 0.25 - 0.64) but not in those who only developed non-endocrine irAEs.

Conclusions

Women may have increased risk of endocrine irAEs secondary to ICI treatment. This is the first study to compare the effects of endocrine irAEs with non-endocrine irAEs on survival. Development of endocrine irAEs may confer survival benefit in ICI treatment and future, prospective studies are needed to elucidate this.

Reaching the Diagnosis of Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Diabetes Mellitus in Different Clinical Scenarios: A Real-World Application of Updated Diagnostic Criteria

BACKGROUND

Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-associated diabetes mellitus (CPI-DM) is a rare immune-related adverse event (irAE) that presents with variable clinical manifestations. Data about its pathogenesis have not yet been adequately studied.

METHODS

Applying the recently updated diagnostic criteria from the American Diabetes Association, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all CPI-treated patients referred to our endocrinological unit for managing their endocrine irAEs and analyzed the incidence of CPI-DM, its clinical characteristics, and its management.

RESULTS

Among the 326 CPI-treated patients with endocrine irAEs, 4 patients met the updated criteria for the diagnosis of CPI-DM, representing 1.22% of all endocrine irAEs in our cohort. These four patients presented with distinct clinical scenarios regarding the irAE onset, the underlying malignancy, the administered CPI regimen, and the type of circulating autoantibodies.

CONCLUSION

The variable presentation of CPI-DM and the non-standard sensitivity of the presence of the type 1 DM traditional autoantibodies highlight the need for distinct guidelines and increased awareness of its diagnosis and management.

Distinct changes to pancreatic volume rather than pancreatic autoantibody positivity: insights into immune checkpoint inhibitors induced diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are promising treatment options for various cancers. However, their use is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including ICI-induced diabetes mellitus (ICI-DM). This study aimed to investigate the clinical features of ICI-DM, with a particular focus on alterations to pancreatic volume.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 2829 patients who received ICI treatment at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, between January 2014 and December 2021. New-onset diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) was identified in ten patients receiving ICI therapy. Pancreatic volumes were assessed by manual segmentation of computed tomography (CT) images before and after ICI-DM diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among these ten patients, nivolumab was the most commonly used ICI (50.0%), followed by pembrolizumab (30.0%) and atezolizumab (20.0%). One patient received combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab. The median age was 63.01 years (range: 40.1 - 87.8). ICI-DM developed after a median of 13.5 cycles (range: 2 - 42) of ICI treatment or 9.85 months (range:1.5 - 21.3) since ICI initiation. The initial presentation was DKA in 60.0% of patients. All patients had low or undetectable C-peptide levels (range: <0.033 - 0.133 nmol/L) and were negative for most type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)-related autoantibodies; only one patient tested positive for glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies. CT imaging revealed significant pancreatic atrophy, with a median pancreatic volume decrease of 19.92% (P = 0.038) from baseline and sustained significant decline at last follow-up (median - 37.14%, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

ICI-DM is often accompanied by pancreatic atrophy and approximately two-thirds of patients initially present with DKA. Although the majority of ICI-DM patients lack T1DM-related autoantibodies, identifying diminished pancreatic volumes through CT imaging provides valuable clues into the subclinical aspects of ICI-DM development, aiding in the prevention of diabetic emergencies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Rare, late onset of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus in a patient with small-cell lung cancer treated with serplulimab: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

As a newly approved immune checkpoint inhibitor in China, serplulimab has been widely used in the immunotherapy of tumors. However, the immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors should not be ignored. Although immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus is a rare complication, it may cause diabetic ketoacidosis and endanger the lives of patients.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case report describes a 55-year-old male of Han nationality from China diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer with multiple metastases who experienced an adverse event of type 1 diabetes mellitus 68 weeks after receiving serplulimab therapy. The patient presented with typical symptoms of diabetic ketoacidosis, including severe thirst, nausea, vomiting, deep respirations, and stupor. Despite the absence of diabetes-related autoantibodies, the patient had extremely low levels of insulin and C-peptide release. Other potential causes of diabetes were ruled out, confirming the condition as serplulimab-induced immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus. After aggressive treatment to correct diabetic ketoacidosis, the patient's blood glucose levels stabilized and symptoms of diabetes improved significantly, although long-term insulin maintenance therapy was necessary.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights a rare, late-onset adverse event of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus that may be overlooked during treatment with serplulimab. The monitoring of blood glucose levels and early signs and symptoms of diabetes cannot be relaxed at the late stage of treatment, even if patients do not have elevated blood glucose levels before and during the middle stage of treatment.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus affected by potential toxicity from long-term use of nivolumab

We present a case of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) that developed in a 53-year-old man after long-term treatment with nivolumab. The patient underwent total gastrectomy for gastric cancer at 40 years of age, and he was started on nivolumab at age 48 years for treatment of a recurrent lesion that proved resistant to standard chemotherapy. Nivolumab treatment resulted in complete response, but, after the 136th infusion of the drug at age 53 years, the patient was hospitalized for sudden onset of diabetic ketoacidosis. He was diagnosed with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced T1DM (ICI-DM), which developed 1988 days (284 weeks) after initiation of nivolumab. HLA typing revealed disease susceptibility alleles for both fulminant T1DM and ICI-DM. With the increased survival after the ICI treatment, delayed-onset irAEs after long-term use of ICI have been reported; however, delayed-onset ICI-DM remains to be elucidated. This case provides important insight into ICI-DM that develops after prolonged ICI administration, and it suggests that patients should be monitored for ICI-DM regardless of the duration of ICI therapy.

Review on Monoclonal Antibodies (mAbs) as a Therapeutic Approach for Type 1 Diabetes

Monoclonal antibodies have been successfully utilized in a variety of animal models to treat auto-immune illnesses for a long time. Immune system responses will either be less active or more active depending on how the immune system is operating abnormally. Immune system hypoactivity reduces the body's capacity to fight off various invading pathogens, whereas immune system hyperactivity causes the body to attack and kill its own tissues and cells. For maximal patient compliance, we will concentrate on a variety of antibody therapies in this study to treat Type 1 diabetes (an autoimmune condition). T-cells are responsible for the auto-immune condition known as T1D, which causes irregularities in the function of β-cells in the pancreas. As a result, for the treatment and prevention of T1D, immunotherapies that selectively restore continuous beta cellspecific self-tolerance are needed. Utilizing monoclonal antibodies is one way to specifically target immune cell populations responsible for the auto-immune-driven disease (mAb). Numerous mAbs have demonstrated clinical safety and varied degrees of success in modulating autoimmunity, including T1D. A targeted cell population is exhausted by mAb treatments, regardless of antigenic specificity. One drawback of this treatment is the loss of obtained protective immunity. Immune effector cell function is regulated by nondepleting monoclonal antibodies (mAb). The antigenfocused new drug delivery system is made possible by the adaptability of mAbs. For the treatment of T1D and T-cell-mediated autoimmunity, different existing and potential mAb therapy methods are described in this article.

Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors-Induced Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: From Its Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Practice

With the increasing use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), such as anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), for the treatment of malignancies, cases of ICI-induced type 1 diabetes mellitus (ICI-T1DM) have been reported globally. This review focuses on the features and pathogenesis of this disease. T1DM is an immune-related adverse event that occurs following the administration of anti-PD-1 or anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PDL1) alone or in combination with anti-CTLA-4. More than half of the reported cases presented as abrupt-onset diabetic ketoacidosis. The primary mechanism of ICI-T1DM is T-cell stimulation, which results from the loss of interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1 in pancreatic islet. The similarities and differences between ICI-T1DM and classical T1DM may provide insights into this disease entity. ICI-T1DM is a rare but often life-threatening medical emergency that healthcare professionals and patients need to be aware of. Early detection of and screening for this disease is imperative. At present, the only known treatment for ICI-T1DM is insulin injection. Further research into the mechanisms and risk factors associated with ICI-T1DM development may contribute to a better understanding of this disease entity and the identification of possible preventive strategies.

Clinical characteristics and human leukocyte antigens in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced type 1 diabetes and pituitary dysfunction: a single center prospective study

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) induced type 1 diabetes (T1D) and pituitary dysfunction are life-threatening adverse events, yet there is little clinical data available. We aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with these adverse events and report their human leukocyte antigen (HLA) profile to determine its relevance.

METHODS

This is a single-center prospective study. We enrolled patients with cancers who were administered ICI and diagnosed as ICI induced T1D (ICI-T1D) and pituitary dysfunction (ICI-PD). Clinical data and extracted DNA from blood samples were collected. HLA typing was performed using next-generation sequencing. We compared our results with those previously reported in healthy controls and investigated the correlation between HLA and the occurrence of ICI-T1D and ICI-PD.

RESULTS

We identified 914 patients treated with ICI in our facility from 1st September, 2017 to 30th June, 2022. Six of these patients developed T1D and 15 developed pituitary dysfunction. The duration from the initiation of ICI treatment to the onset of T1D or pituitary dysfunction averaged 492 ± 196 days and 191 ± 169 days. Among the six patients with T1D, two were positive for anti-GAD antibody. The frequencies of HLA-DR11, -Cw10, -B61, -DRB1*11:01, and -C*03:04 were significantly higher in patients with ICI-T1D than in controls. The frequencies of HLA-DR15 and -DRB*15:02 were significantly higher in patients with ICI-PD than in controls.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed the clinical characteristics of ICI-T1D and ICI-PD and the association between specific HLAs and these adverse events.

Risk Factors and Characteristics of Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Autoimmune Diabetes Mellitus (CIADM): A Systematic Review and Delineation From Type 1 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Checkpoint inhibitor-associated autoimmune diabetes mellitus (CIADM) is a distinct form of autoimmune diabetes that is a rare complication of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Data regarding CIADM are limited.

PURPOSE

To systematically review available evidence to identify presentation characteristics and risk factors for early or severe presentations of adult patients with CIADM.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE and PubMed databases were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION

English full text articles from 2014 to April 2022 were identified with a predefined search strategy. Patients meeting diagnostic criteria for CIADM with evidence of hyperglycemia (blood glucose level >11 mmol/L or HbA1c ≥6.5%) and insulin deficiency (C-peptide <0.4 nmol/L and/or diabetic ketoacidosis [DKA]) were included for analysis.

DATA EXTRACTION

With the search strategy we identified 1,206 articles. From 146 articles, 278 patients were labeled with "CIADM," with 192 patients meeting our diagnostic criteria and included in analysis.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Mean ± SD age was 63.4 ± 12.4 years. All but one patient (99.5%) had prior exposure to either anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1 therapy. Of the 91 patients tested (47.3%), 59.3% had susceptibility haplotypes for type 1 diabetes (T1D). Median time to CIADM onset was 12 weeks (interquartile range 6-24). DKA occurred in 69.7%, and initial C-peptide was low in 91.6%. T1D autoantibodies were present in 40.4% (73 of 179) and were significantly associated with DKA (P = 0.0009) and earlier time to CIADM onset (P = 0.02).

LIMITATIONS

Reporting of follow-up data, lipase, and HLA haplotyping was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

CIADM commonly presents in DKA. While T1D autoantibodies are only positive in 40.4%, they associate with earlier, more severe presentations.

A Concerted Vision to Advance the Knowledge of Diabetes Mellitus Related to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

The rubric of immune-related (ir) diabetes mellitus (DM) (irDM) encompasses various hyperglycemic disorders related to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPis). Beyond sharing similarities with conventional DM, irDM is a distinct, yet important, entity. The present narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the literature regarding irDM published in major databases from January 2018 until January 2023. Initially considered rare, irDM is increasingly being reported. To advance the knowledge of irDM, the present review suggests a concerted vision comprising two intertwined aspects: a scientific-centered and a patient-centered view. The scientific-centered aspect addresses the pathophysiology of irDM, integrating: (i) ICPi-induced pancreatic islet autoimmunity in genetically predisposed patients; (ii) altered gut microbiome; (iii) involvement of exocrine pancreas; (iv) immune-related acquired generalized lipodystrophy. The patient-centered aspect is both nurtured by and nurturing the four pillars of the scientific-centered aspect: awareness, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of irDM. The path forward is a multidisciplinary initiative towards: (i) improved characterization of the epidemiological, clinical, and immunological profile of irDM; (ii) standardization of reporting, management, and surveillance protocols for irDM leveraging global registries; (iii) patient stratification according to personalized risk for irDM; (iv) new treatments for irDM; and (v) uncoupling ICPi efficacy from immunotoxicity.

Endocrine Dysfunction From Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Pearls and Pitfalls in Evaluation and Management

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPis) have proven extremely efficacious in cancer therapy but also lead to a plethora of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The endocrine irAEs are not only quite common but also may pose a challenge to the clinician while managing a patient with cancer treated with ICPis. The clinical features of endocrine dysfunction are usually nonspecific and may overlap with concurrent illnesses, underlying the importance of accurate hormone testing and efforts toward case-finding. The management of endocrine irAEs is unique in the focus being on hormone replacement rather than curtailing the autoimmune process. Although the management of thyroid irAEs appears straightforward, adrenal insufficiency and insulin-dependent diabetes can be life-threatening if not promptly recognized and treated. This clinical review synthesizes the studies to provide pearls and pitfalls in the evaluation and management of endocrine irAEs with specific reference to guidelines from oncologic societies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes mellitus with nivolumab

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been increasingly used in the treatment of various advanced cancers; however, therapy can be complicated by immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We present the case of a man in his 40s, with metastatic melanoma treated with nivolumab immunotherapy who developed ICI-induced diabetes mellitus (ICI-DM). Hyperglycaemia in the absence of ketoacidosis was incidentally noted when he presented to the emergency department for review of an urticarial rash. Further testing, including haemoglobin A1c and C-peptide level, confirmed his presentation was most consistent with ICI-DM and he was commenced on appropriate diabetes treatment. This report aims to detail an atypical presentation of ICI-DM and to highlight the importance of clinician awareness in identifying this irAE in patients receiving ICIs.

Predictive Biomarkers for Checkpoint Inhibitor Immune-Related Adverse Events

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are antagonists of inhibitory receptors in the immune system, such as the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4, the programmed cell death protein-1 and its ligand PD-L1, and they are increasingly used in cancer treatment. By blocking certain suppressive pathways, ICIs promote T-cell activation and antitumor activity but may induce so-called immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which mimic traditional autoimmune disorders. With the approval of more ICIs, irAE prediction has become a key factor in improving patient survival and quality of life. Several biomarkers have been described as potential irAE predictors, some of them are already available for clinical use and others are under development; examples include circulating blood cell counts and ratios, T-cell expansion and diversification, cytokines, autoantibodies and autoantigens, serum and other biological fluid proteins, human leucocyte antigen genotypes, genetic variations and gene profiles, microRNAs, and the gastrointestinal microbiome. Nevertheless, it is difficult to generalize the application of irAE biomarkers based on the current evidence because most studies have been retrospective, time-limited and restricted to a specific type of cancer, irAE or ICI. Long-term prospective cohorts and real-life studies are needed to assess the predictive capacity of different potential irAE biomarkers, regardless of the ICI type, organ involved or cancer site.

Predictive Biomarkers for Immune-Related Endocrinopathies following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment

In recent years, in the context of the increase in the life expectancy of cancer patients, special attention has been given to immunotherapy and, indeed, to immune checkpoint inhibitors. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors has increased rapidly, and approximately 40% of cancer patients are eligible for this treatment. Although their impact is valuable on cancer treatment, immune checkpoint inhibitors come with side effects, known as immune-related adverse effects. These can affect many systems, including cutaneous, musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, endocrine, neural, and pulmonary systems. In this review, we focus on immune-related endocrinopathies that affect around 10% of all treated patients. Endocrine dysfunctions can manifest as hypophysitis, thyroid dysfunction, hypoparathyroidism, insulin-deficient diabetes mellitus, and primary adrenal insufficiency. Currently, there are multiple ongoing clinical trials that aim to identify possible predictive biomarkers for immune-related adverse effects. The design of those clinical trials relies on collecting a variety of biological specimens (tissue biopsy, blood, plasma, saliva, and stool) at baseline and regular intervals during treatment. In this review, we present the predictive biomarkers (such as antibodies, hormones, cytokines, human leukocyte antigens, and eosinophils) that could potentially be utilized in clinical practice in order to predict adverse effects and manage them appropriately.

Combined diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state in type 1 diabetes mellitus induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Underrecognized and underreported emergency in ICIs-DM

Background

Combined diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state (HHS) secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is extremely rarely reported among ICIs- diabetes mellitus (DM) cases and is always ignored by physicians. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review to recognize better the rare adverse event of combined DKA-HHS associated with immune checkpoints.

Methods

A electronic search in Pubmed/Cochrane/Web of Science, complemented by manual searches in article references, was conducted to identify clinical features of ICIs-combined DKA-HHS.

Results

we identified 106 patients with ICIs- type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) from 82 publications: 9 patients presented a coexistence of metabolic acidosis, severe hyperglycemia, and/or DKA; All patients were not diagnosed as combined DKA-HHS. Compared with ICIs-DKA patients, combined DKA-HHS cases were prone to higher hyperglycemia (1020 ± 102.5 vs 686.7 ± 252.6mg/dL). Moreover, acute kidney injury (87.5% vs 28.6%) and prior chemotherapy (66.7% vs 31.6%) showed higher occurrences with the onset of ICIs-HHS or combined DKA-HHS.B.

Conclusions

Combined DKA-HHS portends a poor diagnosis in patients with coexistence features of DKA and HHS, which healthcare professionals and patients should be aware of due to differences in treatment. Our observational retrospective case series shows that patients with more risk factors were more likely to develop combined DKA-HHS. We are the first to report this group of patients' clinical characteristics and outcomes.

Increased risk of incident diabetes after therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor compared with conventional chemotherapy: A longitudinal trajectory analysis using a tertiary care hospital database

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) has been emerged as a promising cancer treatment. However, ICI use induces immune-related adverse events, including diabetes mellitus. We compared the risk of new-onset diabetes between patients receiving an ICI and those receiving conventional chemotherapy (CC).

METHODS

Using a tertiary care hospital database, we included cancer patients without a previous history of diabetes who were treated with either CC or an ICI. One-to-five nearest neighbor propensity matching was applied, and the risk of diabetes was estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Latent class growth modeling was performed with a trajectory approach to determine distinct clusters that followed similar glucose trajectory patterns over time.

RESULTS

Among 1326 subjects, 1105 received CC, and 221 received an ICI. The risk of new-onset diabetes was significantly higher in the ICI group than the CC group (adjusted hazard ratio 2.454, 95 % confidence interval 1.528-3.940; p < 0.001). The ICI group had a higher proportion of subjects in the trajectory cluster with an increasing glucose pattern than the CC group (10.4 % and 7.4 %, respectively). Within the ICI group, the subjects with an increasing glucose pattern were predominantly male and associated with enhanced lymphocytosis after ICI administration.

CONCLUSIONS

ICI therapy is associated with an increased risk of incident diabetes compared with CC. The glucose levels of patients treated with an ICI, especially males and those with prominent lymphocytosis after ICI treatment, need to be monitored regularly to detect ICI-associated diabetes as early as possible.

APPROACH TO THE PATIENT WITH IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITOR-ASSOCIATED ENDOCRINE DYSFUNCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are cancer therapies that are approved in at least 19 different cancers. They function by stimulating immune cell responses against cancer, and their toxicities comprise a host of autoinflammatory syndromes that may impact any organ system. Endocrine toxicities occur in as high as 25-50% of ICI recipients, depending on the treatment regimen used. These toxicities vary in severity from mild, asymptomatic cases of subclinical hypothyroidism to severe, fatal cases of adrenal crisis, thyroid dysfunction, or diabetic ketoacidosis. Thus, timely recognition and treatment is critical. Herein, we present clinical cases of ICI-induced thyroid dysfunction, hypophysitis, and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. We use these cases to discuss the screening, diagnosis, and management of ICI-associated endocrine dysfunction.

Re-Enlightenment of Fulminant Type 1 Diabetes under the COVID-19 Pandemic

Fulminant type 1 diabetes (FT1D) is a subtype of type 1 diabetes (T1D) that is characterized by the rapid progression to diabetic ketoacidosis against the background of rapid and almost complete pancreatic islet destruction. The HbA1c level at FT1D onset remains normal or slightly elevated despite marked hyperglycemia, reflecting the rapid clinical course of the disease, and is an important marker for diagnosis. FT1D often appears following flu-like symptoms, and there are many reports of its onset being linked to viral infections. In addition, disease-susceptibility genes have been identified in FT1D, suggesting the involvement of host factors in disease development. In most cases, islet-related autoantibodies are not detected, and histology of pancreatic tissue reveals macrophage and T cell infiltration of the islets in the early stages of FT1D, suggesting that islet destruction occurs via an immune response different from that occurring in autoimmune type 1 diabetes. From 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) spread worldwide and became a serious problem. Reports on the association between SARS-CoV-2 and T1D are mixed, with some suggesting an increase in T1D incidence due to the COVID-19 pandemic. When discussing the association between COVID-19 and T1D, it is also necessary to focus on FT1D. However, it is not easy to diagnose this subtype without understanding the concept. Therefore, authors hereby review the concept and the latest findings of FT1D, hoping that the association between COVID-19 and T1D will be adequately evaluated in the future.

Acute presentation of immunotherapy-related diabetes mellitus without ketoacidosis, low C-peptide or elevated HbA1c

Summary

The rapid rise in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors as systemic cancer therapy has seen the emergence of immunotherapy-induced diabetes, a severe irreversible immunotherapy-related adverse event. Affected patients typically present with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and low C-peptide consistent with insulin deficiency secondary to autoimmune β-cell destruction. We present the unusual case of a 61-year-old female with metastatic ampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma with primary tumour adjacent to the pancreatic head. She was commenced on immunotherapy after conventional systemic chemotherapy. Acute-onset hyperglycaemia was detected after 7 weeks on weekly blood glucose monitoring, with no glucocorticoid use or prior history of diabetes. On presentation, there was no evidence of DKA, and her glycated haemoglobin level was within the normal non-diabetic range at 5.3%, reflecting the acuity of her presentation. Initial serum C-peptide was preserved; however, it became undetectable a few weeks later, confirming insulin deficiency. We describe a case of atypical presentation of immunotherapy-induced diabetes, review the existing literature on this emerging clinical entity and discuss the differential diagnosis for new-onset diabetes mellitus in patients with metastatic cancer.

Learning points

Regular proactive glycaemic monitoring in patients receiving immunotherapy, particularly antibodies against programmed death ligand 1 and PD1, can facilitate very early detection of immunotherapy-induced diabetes, prompting insulin commencement and avoiding life-threatening presentations of diabetic ketoacidosis. Glycated haemoglobin can be within the normal range in patients diagnosed acutely with immunotherapy-induced diabetes. Serum C-peptide can be preserved initially in patients diagnosed with immunotherapy-induced diabetes but is likely to become undetectable during their illness. New-onset diabetes in patients with metastatic cancer carries a broad differential diagnosis.

Type 1 diabetes associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for malignant melanoma: A case report and review of 8 cases

Advanced malignant melanoma (MM) is treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, which often results in several immune-related adverse events. Fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is a rare, rapidly progressive, life-threatening disease. Here, we summarize 8 cases of MM with ICI-induced T1DM and describe one case that developed fulminant T1DM due to nivolumab therapy. We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with ICI from 2014 to 2021 at our hospital. The clinical features and risk factors of ICI-induced T1DM were discussed. ICIs were administered to 426 MM patients at our hospital. Among these, nivolumab was administered in 5 cases, pembrolizumab in 1 case, and the combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab in 2 cases. The frequency of ICI-associated T1DM was 1.88%. The mean glycated hemoglobin level at T1DM onset was 8.0 ± 1.0%. Of the patients, 75% were diagnosed with fulminant T1DM, 62.5% developed diabetic ketoacidosis, and 25% had glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibodies (an early predictive marker for T1DM). The mean interval between the first ICI administration and T1DM development was 201 ± 187 days. The mean duration of resumption was 13 ± 7 days. We should monitor for T1DM development following treatment with ICIs. ICI can be continued to be used to treat MM if insulin therapy successfully controls T1DM. A 67-year-old patient who received adjuvant nivolumab therapy developed fulminant T1DM and thyrotoxicosis 57 days later and tested positive for GAD antibodies. Subsequently, he developed hypophysitis and an isolated adrenocorticotropin deficiency. He continued receiving nivolumab along with self-injected insulin without developing recurrence.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus induced by PD-1 inhibitors in China: a report of two cases

The immune-related adverse events associated with immunotherapy may affect endocrine glands and other tissues. Two Chinese patients with malignancies were treated with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and followed up with biochemical tests over 1 year. After PD-1 treatment for 6 to 10 months, the patients developed symptoms of diabetes, ketoacidosis, and insulin secretion failure. Type 1 diabetes mellitus was confirmed by the characteristic fluctuation of blood glucose that was controlled with multiple daily insulin injections. Neither patient’s insulin depletion status was reversed in subsequent years. To decrease the life-threatening complications of diabetic hyperosmolar syndrome and ketoacidosis caused by type 1 diabetes mellitus, it is necessary to monitor the blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels. Islet β-cell autoantibodies and human leukocyte antigen genes can provide additional information in select cases.

Hospital Diabetes Meeting 2022

The annual Virtual Hospital Diabetes Meeting was hosted by Diabetes Technology Society on April 1 and April 2, 2022. This meeting brought together experts in diabetes technology to discuss various new developments in the field of managing diabetes in hospitalized patients. Meeting topics included (1) digital health and the hospital, (2) blood glucose targets, (3) software for inpatient diabetes, (4) surgery, (5) transitions, (6) coronavirus disease and diabetes in the hospital, (7) drugs for diabetes, (8) continuous glucose monitoring, (9) quality improvement, (10) diabetes care and educatinon, and (11) uniting people, process, and technology to achieve optimal glycemic management. This meeting covered new technology that will enable better care of people with diabetes if they are hospitalized.

Type 1 diabetes related to immune checkpoint inhibitors

Type 1 diabetes, in part, has been recently reported as a side effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The frequency of type 1 diabetes related to ICIs is estimated to be ∼3.5%. However, type 1 diabetes related to ICIs often presents with diabetic ketoacidosis or ketosis within approximately 2 weeks after hyperglycemic symptoms, such as dry mouth, polydipsia, and polyuria, necessitating urgent diagnosis and insulin treatment. Endogenous insulin secretion is depleted within 3 weeks of the clinical onset of type 1 diabetes. Moreover, the positive rate for islet-related autoantibodies has been shown to vary from 5% to 50%, and exocrine pancreatic enzyme levels are mildly increased. Thus, the clinical course of type 1 diabetes associated with ICIs is similar to that of fulminant type 1 diabetes. In this review, we describe the clinical features of type 1 diabetes associated with ICIs.

Bioactives of Momordica charantia as Potential Anti-Diabetic/Hypoglycemic Agents

Momordica charantia L., a member of the Curcubitaceae family, has traditionally been used as herbal medicine and as a vegetable. Functional ingredients of M. charantia play important roles in body health and human nutrition, which can be used directly or indirectly in treating or preventing hyperglycemia-related chronic diseases in humans. The hypoglycemic effects of M. charantia have been known for years. In this paper, the research progress of M. charantia phytobioactives and their hypoglycemic effects and related mechanisms, especially relating to diabetes mellitus, has been reviewed. Moreover, the clinical application of M. charantia in treating diabetes mellitus is also discussed, hoping to broaden the application of M. charantia as functional food.

Validation of an online application to identify potential immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors based on the patient’s symptoms

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly being used to treat malignancies. Some patients experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which may affect any organ/tissue. IrAEs are occasionally fatal and usually have nonspecific symptoms. We developed a three-step application (https://irae-search.com/) to provide healthcare professionals with information on the diagnosis, treatment options, and published reports for 38 categories of irAEs encountered in clinical practice.

Methods

IrAEs reported in ≥5 cases were identified from articles published between October 2018 and August 2020 by searching Japanese (SELIMIC, JAPIC-Q Service, and JMED Plus) and international (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Derwent Drug File) databases. The cases’ symptoms were entered into the application to identify irAEs, which were verified using the reported diagnosis, to evaluate the application’s sensitivity and specificity.

Results

Overall, 1209 cases (1067 reports) were analyzed. The three most common categories of irAEs were pituitary or adrenal disorders (14% of cases), skin disorders (13%), and diabetes mellitus (10%). The top three primary diseases were lung cancer (364 cases), melanoma (286 cases), and renal cell carcinoma (218 cases). The average sensitivity was 90.8% (range 44.4%–100.0%) initially, and improved to 94.8% (range 83.3%–100.0%) after incorporating the symptoms reported in published cases into the application’s logic for two irAE categories. The average specificity was 79.3% (range 59.1% [thyroid disorders]–98.2% [arthritis]).

Conclusion

irAE Search is an easy-to-use application designed to help healthcare professionals identify potential irAEs in ICI-treated patients in a timely manner to facilitate prompt management/treatment. The application showed high sensitivity and moderate-to-high specificity for detecting irAEs.

Modeling human T1D-associated autoimmune processes

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease characterized by impaired immune tolerance to β-cell antigens and progressive destruction of insulin-producing β-cells. Animal models have provided valuable insights for understanding the etiology and pathogenesis of this disease, but they fall short of reflecting the extensive heterogeneity of the disease in humans, which is contributed by various combinations of risk gene alleles and unique environmental factors. Collectively, these factors have been used to define subgroups of patients, termed endotypes, with distinct predominating disease characteristics.

SCOPE OF REVIEW

Here, we review the gaps filled by these models in understanding the intricate involvement and regulation of the immune system in human T1D pathogenesis. We describe the various models developed so far and the scientific questions that have been addressed using them. Finally, we discuss the limitations of these models, primarily ascribed to hosting a human immune system (HIS) in a xenogeneic recipient, and what remains to be done to improve their physiological relevance.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

To understand the role of genetic and environmental factors or evaluate immune-modifying therapies in humans, it is critical to develop and apply models in which human cells can be manipulated and their functions studied under conditions that recapitulate as closely as possible the physiological conditions of the human body. While microphysiological systems and living tissue slices provide some of these conditions, HIS mice enable more extensive analyses using in vivo systems.

Flash Glucose Monitoring and Diabetes Mellitus Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Approach to Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to investigate in depth diabetes mellitus associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (DM-ICIs) by analysing a case series. We also evaluated the clinical impact of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) systems in the management of this entity.

METHODS

We conducted an observational cohort study of DM-ICIs diagnosed in two hospitals in Seville (Spain). Patients with a new diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM) or with sudden worsening of preexisting DM after starting treatment with ICIs, with a random 5 hour-postprandial C-peptide value of <0.6 nmol/L and without possibility of subsequent withdrawal of insulin treatment, were included.

RESULTS

A total of 7 cases were identified, mostly males (n = 6; 85.7%), with a mean age of 64.9 years. The mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) upon diagnosis was 8.1%, with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) observed in 6 cases (85.7%). Subcutaneous flash glucose monitoring (FGM) systems were used in six cases, with a mean follow-up period of 42.7 weeks. During the first 90 days of use, mean average glucose was 167.5 mg/dL, with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 34.6%. The mean time in the range 70-180 mg/dL (TIR) was 59.7%, with a mean time above range (TAR) 181-250 mg/dL of 27.8% and a mean TAR > 250 mg/dL of 10.2%. The mean time below range (TBR) 54-69 mg/dL was 2%, while the mean TBR < 54 mg/dL was 0.3%. The mean glucose management indicator (GMI) was 7.3%. No significant differences were observed in FGM values for the following 90 days of follow-up. A progressive improvement in all parameters of glycaemic control was observed between the first month of FGM use and the sixth month of FGM use. Of note, there was a decrease in mean CV (40.6% to 34.1%, p = 0.25), mean TAR 181-250 (30.3% to 26%, p = 0.49), mean TAR > 250 mg/dL (16.3% to 7.7%, p = 0.09), mean TBR 54-69 mg/dL (5.2% to 2%, p = 0.16), and mean TBR < 54 mg/dL (1.8% to 0.2%, p = 0.31), along with an increase in mean values of TIR 70-180 mg/dL (46.5% to 60.5%, p = 0.09). The lack of statistical significance in the differences observed in the mean FGM values over the follow-up period may be related to the small sample size.

CONCLUSION

DM-ICI is recognised by a state of sudden-onset insulinopenia, often associated with DKA. The use of FGM systems may be a valid option for the effective management of DM-ICIs and for the prevention of severe hyperglycaemic and hypoglycaemic episodes in this condition.

Patient-Centered Diabetes Care of Cancer Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There is a bidirectional relationship between cancer and diabetes, with one condition influencing the prognosis of the other. Multiple cancer therapies cause diabetes including well-established medications such as glucocorticoids and novel cancer therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors.

RECENT FINDINGS

The nature and severity of diabetes caused by each therapy differ, with some predominantly mediated by insulin resistance, such as PI3K inhibitors and glucocorticoids, while others by insulin deficiency, such as CPIs. Studies have demonstrated diabetes from CPIs to be more rapidly progressing than conventional type 1 diabetes. There remains a scarcity of published guidance for the screening, diagnosis, and management of hyperglycemia and diabetes from these therapies. The need for such guidance is critical because diabetes management in the cancer patient is complex, individualized, and requires inter-disciplinary care. In the present narrative review, we synthesize and summarize the most relevant literature pertaining to diabetes and hyperglycemia in the setting of these cancer therapies and provide an updated patient-centered framework for their evaluation and management.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Diabetes Mellitus: Potential Role of T Cells in the Underlying Mechanism

Immunotherapy is now a recognized treatment option for several types of cancer. However, some cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are subject to immune-related adverse events, including induced diabetes mellitus. The exact role and molecular/genetic action of ICIs in diabetes are still not well understood. Elucidating the underlying mechanisms in a proper fashion would allow better refining of biomarkers that would help diagnose patients at risk of altered immune system homeostasis, but would also hold the potential of new therapeutic options for diabetes. In the present narrative review, we propose to discuss the case of autoimmune diabetes following treatment with ICIs and the role of ICIs in the pathophysiology of diabetes. We also present some scarce available data on interesting potential immune therapies for diabetes.

Unravelling Checkpoint Inhibitor Associated Autoimmune Diabetes: From Bench to Bedside

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the landscape of oncological therapy, but at the price of a new array of immune related adverse events. Among these is β-cell failure, leading to checkpoint inhibitor-related autoimmune diabetes (CIADM) which entails substantial long-term morbidity. As our understanding of this novel disease grows, parallels and differences between CIADM and classic type 1 diabetes (T1D) may provide insights into the development of diabetes and identify novel potential therapeutic strategies. In this review, we outline the knowledge across the disciplines of endocrinology, oncology and immunology regarding the pathogenesis of CIADM and identify possible management strategies.