Association of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolytic therapy: an ExTRACT-TIMI 25 analysis

Clofibrate Treatment Decreases Inflammation and Reverses Myocardial Infarction-Induced Remodelation in a Rodent Experimental Model

Myocardial infarction (MI) initiates an inflammatory response that promotes both beneficial and deleterious effects. The early response helps the myocardium to remove damaged tissue; however, a prolonged later response brings cardiac remodeling characterized by functional, metabolic, and structural pathological changes. Current pharmacological treatments have failed to reverse ischemic-induced cardiac damage. Therefore, our aim was to study if clofibrate treatment was capable of decreasing inflammation and apoptosis, and reverse ventricular remodeling and MI-induced functional damage. Male Wistar rats were assigned to (1) Sham coronary artery ligation (Sham) or (2) Coronary artery ligation (MI). Seven days post-MI, animals were further divided to receive vehicle (V) or clofibrate (100 mg/kg, C) for 7 days. The expression of IL-6, TNF-α, and inflammatory related molecules ICAM-1, VCAM-1, MMP-2 and -9, nuclear NF-kB, and iNOS, were elevated in MI-V. These inflammatory biomarkers decreased in MI-C. Also, apoptotic proteins (Bax and pBad) were elevated in MI-V, while clofibrate augmented anti-apoptotic proteins (Bcl-2 and 14-3-3ε). Clofibrate also protected MI-induced changes in ultra-structure. The ex vivo evaluation of myocardial functioning showed that left ventricular pressure and mechanical work decreased in infarcted rats; clofibrate treatment raised those parameters to control values. Echocardiogram showed that clofibrate partially reduced LV dilation. In conclusion, clofibrate decreases cardiac remodeling, decreases inflammatory molecules, and partly preserves myocardial diameters.

Therapeutic Approaches Targeting Inflammation in Cardiovascular Disorders

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the Western world and represents an enormous global health burden. Significant advances have been made in the conservative, medical and surgical management across the range of cardiovascular diseases however the inflammatory components of these diseases have traditionally been neglected. Inflammation is certainly a key component of atherosclerosis, a chronic inflammatory condition, but it is at least correlative and predictive of risk in many other aspects of cardiovascular medicine ranging from heart failure to outcomes following reperfusion strategies. Inflammation therefore represents significant potential for future risk stratification of patients as well as offering new therapeutic targets across cardiovascular medicine. This review explores the role of inflammation in several of the major aspects of cardiovascular medicine focusing on current and possible future examples of the targeting of inflammation in prognosis and therapy. It concludes that future directions of cardiovascular research and clinical practice should seek to identify cohorts of patients with a significant inflammatory component to their cardiovascular condition or reaction to cardiovascular intervention. These patients might benefit from therapeutic strategies mounted against the inflammatory components implicated in their condition.

Treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients after myocardial infarction - a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Studies over the past decade have shown that NSAIDs are associated with increased cardiovascular risk and may predispose to myocardial infarction in healthy individuals. Despite this knowledge patients with established cardiovascular disease are frequently treated with NSAIDs. The benefits versus potential harm of treatment need careful assessment.

AREAS COVERED

Observational studies and clinical trials providing information about outcome of NSAID treatment in post MI patients were retrieved; fourteen articles in total: two case-control studies, two randomized double-blind trials and ten cohort studies. The studies had a follow-up time between 30 days and 15 years. Two studies reported of risk of atrial fibrillation, and only one addressed antithrombotic treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

The risk of death and reinfarction in this group of patients is well established. Further studies are needed to investigate factors increasing the risk of atrial fibrillation. The correlation between recommended pharmaceutical treatment post MI and NSAIDs needs to be further examined. None of the studies examined correlated their results to dosages available over the counter.

Anti-inflammatory strategies for ventricular remodeling following ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) leads to molecular, structural, geometric, and functional changes in the heart in a process known as ventricular remodeling. An intense organized inflammatory response is triggered after myocardial ischemia and necrosis and involves all components of the innate immunity, affecting both cardiomyocytes and noncardiomyocyte cells. Inflammation is triggered by tissue injury; it mediates wound healing and scar formation and affects ventricular remodeling. Many therapeutic attempts aimed at reducing inflammation in AMI during the past 3 decades presented issues of impaired healing or increased risk of cardiac rupture or failed to show any additional benefit in addition to standard therapies. More recent strategies aimed at selectively blocking one of the key factors upstream rather than globally suppressing the response downstream have shown some promising results in pilot trials. We herein review the pathophysiological mechanisms of inflammation and ventricular remodeling after AMI and the results of clinical trials with anti-inflammatory strategies.

Cardiovascular safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs among healthy individuals

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Studies have raised concern on the cardiovascular safety of NSAIDs. We studied safety of NSAID therapy in a nationwide cohort of healthy individuals.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This is a review of the literature regarding cardiovascular safety of NSAIDs with special focus on the few studies investigating healthy individuals.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Due to a high frequency of gastrointestinal complications related to NSAID treatment a new generation of NSAID, called the selective COX-2 inhibitors, were developed in order to use the beneficial pain-relieving effect of NSAIDs without the COX-1 related risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the selective COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib was withdrawn from the market in 2004 after studies had documented an increased risk of myocardial infarction related to this drug. Focus also turned to the traditional NSAIDs and found similar results for some of the older drugs, especially diclofenac and high-dose ibuprofen. Most interventional studies have not been designed specifically to evaluate the cardiovascular safety of NSAIDs and no studies have previously investigated the relationship between NSAID treatment and cardiovascular risk in healthy individuals. Overall, evidence regarding the selective COX-2 inhibitors' cardiovascular risk profile (mostly thrombo-embolic events) is derived from the clinical trials whereas results on the traditional NSAIDs are based on observational studies and meta-analyses. Importantly, some of the randomized trials comparing COX-2 inhibitors with traditional NSAIDs did not show a difference in cardiovascular risk and it cannot be denied that the traditional NSAIDs are characterized by a different cardiovascular risk-profile than the COX-2 inhibitors. A recent cohort study among one million healthy people showed that the selective COX-2 inhibitors as well as diclofenac are associated with an increased risk of death or myocardial infarction. This was further underlined by a dose-response relationship.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Individual NSAIDs have different cardiovascular safety that needs to be considered when choosing appropriate treatment. In particular, rofecoxib and diclofenac were associated with increased cardiovascular mortality and morbidity and should be used with caution in most individuals. This notion is also valid for healthy individuals and underlines the importance of critical use of NSAID therapy in the general population and also that over-the-counter retail of NSAIDs should be reassessed.

Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of incident myocardial infarction and heart failure, and all-cause mortality in the Australian veteran community

AIMS

We studied the association between either non-selective NSAIDs (ns-NSAIDs), selective COX-2 inhibitors, or any NSAID and risk of incident myocardial infarction (MI) and heart failure (HF), and all-cause mortality in elderly subjects.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective nested case-control study on Australian veterans using nationwide hospital admission and pharmacy dispensing data. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the risk of events for three different measures of prescription supply exposure over the last 2 years: (i) supplied at least once, (ii) supply frequency: supplied more than twice within the last 30 days, once or twice within the last 30 days, and once or more 30 days to 2 years and (iii) total supplies.

RESULTS

We identified 83 623 cases and 1 662 099 matched controls (1:20) contributing 3 862 931 persons-years of observation. NSAID use at least once within the last 2 years did not significantly affect the risk of MI (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96, 1.04) but was associated with a mildly reduced risk of HF (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92, 0.98). There was a reduced all-cause mortality with at least one supply of either ns-NSAIDs (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90, 0.97), selective COX-2 inhibitors (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.88, 0.93), or any NSAID (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.85, 0.90). Risk of death was also inversely associated with the number of prescription supplies.

CONCLUSIONS

NSAID use is not associated with an increased risk of incident MI and HF but is associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality in Australian veterans.

Acute coronary syndromes: diagnosis and management, part I

The term acute coronary syndrome (ACS) refers to any group of clinical symptoms compatible with acute myocardial ischemia and includes unstable angina (UA), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). These high-risk manifestations of coronary atherosclerosis are important causes of the use of emergency medical care and hospitalization in the United States. A quick but thorough assessment of the patient's history and findings on physical examination, electrocardiography, radiologic studies, and cardiac biomarker tests permit accurate diagnosis and aid in early risk stratification, which is essential for guiding treatment. High-risk patients with UA/NSTEMI are often treated with an early invasive strategy involving cardiac catheterization and prompt revascularization of viable myocardium at risk. Clinical outcomes can be optimized by revascularization coupled with aggressive medical therapy that includes anti-ischemic, antiplatelet, anticoagulant, and lipid-lowering drugs. Evidence-based guidelines provide recommendations for the management of ACS; however, therapeutic approaches to the management of ACS continue to evolve at a rapid pace driven by a multitude of large-scale randomized controlled trials. Thus, clinicians are frequently faced with the problem of determining which drug or therapeutic strategy will achieve the best results. This article summarizes the evidence and provides the clinician with the latest information about the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and risk stratification of ACS and the management of UA/NSTEMI.

Acute coronary syndromes: diagnosis and management, part I

The term acute coronary syndrome (ACS) refers to any group of clinical symptoms compatible with acute myocardial ischemia and includes unstable angina (UA), non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). These high-risk manifestations of coronary atherosclerosis are important causes of the use of emergency medical care and hospitalization in the United States. A quick but thorough assessment of the patient's history and findings on physical examination, electrocardiography, radiologic studies, and cardiac biomarker tests permit accurate diagnosis and aid in early risk stratification, which is essential for guiding treatment. High-risk patients with UA/NSTEMI are often treated with an early invasive strategy involving cardiac catheterization and prompt revascularization of viable myocardium at risk. Clinical outcomes can be optimized by revascularization coupled with aggressive medical therapy that includes anti-ischemic, antiplatelet, anticoagulant, and lipid-lowering drugs. Evidence-based guidelines provide recommendations for the management of ACS; however, therapeutic approaches to the management of ACS continue to evolve at a rapid pace driven by a multitude of large-scale randomized controlled trials. Thus, clinicians are frequently faced with the problem of determining which drug or therapeutic strategy will achieve the best results. This article summarizes the evidence and provides the clinician with the latest information about the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and risk stratification of ACS and the management of UA/NSTEMI.