Outpatient management of patients presenting with venous thromboembolism: Retrospective cohort study at 11 community hospitals

Care pathway for patients hospitalized with venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), is a potentially fatal disease with a multifactorial nature, impacting different medical and surgical specialties. Recently, new guidelines and direct oral anticoagulants facilitated early discharge for most DVT patients and non-severe PE patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to illustrate the distribution of VTE patients throughout the hospital and map their care pathway from Emergency Department (ED) to hospital discharge.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective cross-sectional study included all hospitalized patients with a VTE code from 39 hospitals between 2018 and 2019. Data were analysed using JupyterLab, with subgroup analyses based on mode of entry, diagnosis location and thrombosis site.

RESULTS

A total of 23,199 hospitalizations were analysed, involving 17,718 patients a median age 66 years [52-78] and man-to-women ratio 1.05. Among these, 10,747(46.3%) had PE and 4176(18.0%) had lower limb DVT. The ED was the primary entry point for 31.2% of cases, followed by gastroenterology, surgery, geriatrics, and internal medicine. Patients admitted through ED patients were most frequently transferred to internal medicine, cardiovascular and intensive care units (ICU). The median hospital stay was 9 days [4-21], with ICU stays being the longest (mean 15 days [8-27]). Notably, 1357 patients (18.8%) of VTE patients were discharged within 48 h of ED admission.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to portray the distribution and care pathways of VTE patients across hospital departments. Despite recent clinical guidelines, many patients still require inpatient management, highlighting the need for dedicated care pathway.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs after initiating direct-acting oral anticoagulants or low molecular weight heparins in patients with venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can lead to significant healthcare resource utilization (HcRU) and costs. First-line treatments such as direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are utilized for VTE management. There are limited observational studies to determine which first-line drug for VTE is associated with lower HcRU and cost. Therefore, we sought to compare HcRU and costs of commercially insured patients with VTE who initiated DOAC or LMWH in the US.

METHODS

We utilized Merative MarketScan Research Database (2016-2021) to identify adults initiating DOAC or LMWH for VTE. Baseline measures were assessed 12 months prior to the index date of drug initiation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to control confounding. For HcRU, logistic regression was used to model emergency room and inpatient visits and the negative binomial count model was used for outpatient visits. The average marginal effect for total healthcare cost comparing DOAC with LMWH users was estimated using a generalized linear model. HcRU and costs were evaluated for 12 months posttreatment initiation.

RESULTS

DOAC users had lower odds of inpatient visits (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.53, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.59), emergency room visits (aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.99), and outpatient visits (adjusted incident rate ratio 0.52, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.54) in comparison to LMWH users. DOAC users had lower total healthcare costs of -$9573 (95% CI -$11,149 to -$7997) (US dollars).

CONCLUSION

This cohort study suggests that DOAC use is associated with fewer inpatient, outpatient, and emergency room visits, and lower healthcare costs compared to LMWH use for VTE management.

Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and Reversal of Sulfonated Di- and Triblock Copolymers as Novel Parenteral Anticoagulants

Despite targeting different coagulation cascade sites, all Food and Drug Administration-approved anticoagulants present an elevated risk of bleeding, including potentially life-threatening intracranial hemorrhage. Existing studies have not thoroughly investigated the efficacy and safety of sulfonate polymers in animal models and fully elucidate the precise mechanisms by which these polymers act. The activity and safety of sulfonated di- and triblock copolymers containing poly(sodium styrenesulfonate) (PSSS), poly(sodium 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonate) (PAMPS), poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), poly(sodium methacrylate) (PMAAS), poly(acrylic acid) (PAA), and poly(sodium 11-acrylamidoundecanoate) (PAaU) blocks are synthesized and assessed. PSSS-based copolymers exhibit greater anticoagulant activity than PAMPS-based ones. Their activity is mainly affected by the total concentration of sulfonate groups and molecular weight. PEG-containing copolymers demonstrate a better safety profile than PAA-containing ones. The selected copolymer PEG47-PSSS32 exhibits potent anticoagulant activity in rodents after subcutaneous and intravenous administration. Heparin Binding Copolymer (HBC) completely reverses the anticoagulant activity of polymer in rat and human plasma. No interaction with platelets is observed. Selected copolymer targets mainly factor XII and fibrinogen, and to a lesser extent factors X, IX, VIII, and II, suggesting potential application in blood-contacting biomaterials for anticoagulation purposes. Further studies are needed to explore its therapeutic applications fully.

Initial experience with the ambulatory management of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis with May-Thurner syndrome with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, angioplasty and stenting

OBJECTIVE

Patients undergoing intervention for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IFDVT) with May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) typically require inpatient (IP) hospitalization for initial treatment with anticoagulation and management with pharmacomechanical thrombectomy. Direct oral anticoagulants and percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) devices offer the opportunity for outpatient (OP) management. We describe our approach with these patients.

METHODS

Patients receiving intervention for acute IFDVT from January 2020 through October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients undergoing unilateral thrombectomy, venous angioplasty, and stenting for IFDVT with MTS comprised the study population and were divided into two groups: (1) patients admitted to the hospital and treated as IPs and (2) patients who underwent therapy as OPs. The two groups were compared regarding demographics, risk factors, procedural success, complications, and follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 92 patients were treated for IFDVT with thrombectomy, angioplasty, and stenting of whom 58 comprised the IP group and 34 the OP group. All 92 patients underwent PMT using the Inari ClotTriever (Inari Medical), intravascular ultrasound, angioplasty, and stenting with 100% technical success. Three patients in the IP group required adjuvant thrombolysis. There was no difference in primary patency of the treated IFDVT segment at 12 months between the two groups (IP, 73.5%; OP, 86.7%; P = .21, log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with acute IFDVT and MTS deemed appropriate for thrombectomy and iliac revascularization can be managed with initiation of ambulatory direct oral anticoagulant therapy and subsequent return for ambulatory PMT, angioplasty, and stenting. This approach avoids the expense of IP care and allows for effective use of resources at a time when staffing and supply chain shortages have led to inefficiencies in the provision of IP care for nonemergent conditions.

Trends in Discharge Rates for Acute Pulmonary Embolism in U.S. Emergency Departments

BACKGROUND

Outpatient management of select patients with low-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) has been proven to be safe and effective, yet recent evidence suggests that patients are still managed with hospitalization. Few studies have assessed contemporary real-world trends in discharge rates from U.S. emergency departments (EDs) for acute PE.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the proportion of discharges from EDs for acute PE changed between 2012 and 2020 and which baseline characteristics are associated with ED discharge.

DESIGN

Serial cross-sectional analysis.

SETTING

U.S. EDs participating in the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

PATIENTS

Patients with ED visits for acute PE between 2012 and 2020.

MEASUREMENTS

National trends in the proportion of discharges for acute PE and factors associated with ED discharge.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2020, there were approximately 1 635 300 visits for acute PE. Overall, ED discharge rates remained constant over time, with rates of 38.2% (95% CI, 17.9% to 64.0%) between 2012 and 2014 and 33.4% (CI, 21.0% to 49.0%) between 2018 and 2020 (adjusted risk ratio, 1.01 per year [CI, 0.89 to 1.14]). No baseline characteristics, including established risk stratification scores, were predictive of an increased likelihood of ED discharge; however, patients at teaching hospitals and those with private insurance were more likely to receive oral anticoagulation at discharge. Only 35.9% (CI, 23.9% to 50.0%) of patients who were considered low-risk according to their Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) class, 33.1% (CI, 21.6% to 47.0%) according to simplified PESI score, and 34.8% (CI, 23.3% to 48.0%) according to hemodynamic stability were discharged from the ED setting.

LIMITATIONS

Cross-sectional survey design and inability to adjudicate diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

In a representative nationwide sample, rates of discharge from the ED for acute PE appear to have remained constant between 2012 and 2020. Only one third of low-risk patients were discharged for outpatient management, and rates seem to have stabilized. Outpatient management of low-risk acute PE may still be largely underutilized in the United States.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

None.

Guideline Adherence As An Indicator of the Extent of Antithrombotic Overuse and Underuse: A Systematic Review

Thromboembolic events are a common risk in adults with atrial fibrillation, those with previous cerebrovascular accidents and undergoing emergency or elective surgeries. The widespread availability of antithrombotic agents and differing guidelines contribute to practice variations and increased risk of complications and deaths. The objective of this review was to investigate the extent of overuse and underuse of antithrombotics for primary or secondary prevention as measured by deviation from prescribing guideline recommendations. We conducted a systematic review of Medline and EMBASE for quantitative articles published between 2000 and 2021 and used a modified version of the Hoy’s risk of bias assessment tool. Here we report evidence from the past decade about wide practice variations in hospitals and primary care, and discuss clinician and patient-driven determinants of non-adherence to guidelines. Finally, we summarise implications for practice, identify enhanced ways of measuring overuse and underuse, and propose potential solutions to the measurement challenges.