1
|
Wei D, Cao C, Karambelas A, Mak J, Reinmann A, Commane R. High-Resolution Modeling of Summertime Biogenic Isoprene Emissions in New York City. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2024; 58:13783-13794. [PMID: 39042817 PMCID: PMC11308517 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c00495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
As cities strive for ambitious increases in tree canopy cover and reductions in anthropogenic volatile organic compound (AVOC) emissions, accurate assessments of the impacts of biogenic VOCs (BVOCs) on air quality become more important. In this study, we aim to quantify the impact of future urban greening on ozone production. BVOC emissions in dense urban areas are often coarsely represented in regional models. We set up a high-resolution (30 m) MEGAN (The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 3.2) to estimate summertime biogenic isoprene emissions in the New York City metro area (NYC-MEGAN). Coupling an observation-constrained box model with NYC-MEGAN isoprene emissions successfully reproduced the observed isoprene concentrations in the city core. We then estimated future isoprene emissions from likely urban greening scenarios and evaluated the potential impact on future ozone production. NYC-MEGAN predicts up to twice as much isoprene emissions in NYC as the coarse-resolution (1.33 km) Biogenic Emission Inventory System version 3.61 (BEIS) on hot summer days. We find that BVOCs drive ozone production on hot summer days, even in the city core, despite large AVOC emissions. If high isoprene emitting species (e.g., oak trees) are planted, future isoprene emissions could increase by 1.4-2.2 times in the city core, which would result in 8-19 ppbv increases in peak ozone on ozone exceedance days with current NOx concentrations. We recommend planting non- or low-isoprene emitting trees in cities with high NOx concentrations to avoid an increase in the frequency and severity of future ozone exceedance events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dandan Wei
- Lamont-Doherty
Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10027-6902, United
States
- Environmental
Sciences Initiative, City University of
New York, Advanced Science Research Center, New York, New York 10031-1246, United
States
- School
of Marine and Atmospheric Science, Stony
Brook University, Stony
Brook, New York 11794-0701, United States
| | - Cong Cao
- School
of Marine and Atmospheric Science, Stony
Brook University, Stony
Brook, New York 11794-0701, United States
| | - Alexandra Karambelas
- Northeast
States for Coordinated Air Use Management, Boston, Massachusetts 02114-2014, United States
| | - John Mak
- School
of Marine and Atmospheric Science, Stony
Brook University, Stony
Brook, New York 11794-0701, United States
| | - Andrew Reinmann
- Environmental
Sciences Initiative, City University of
New York, Advanced Science Research Center, New York, New York 10031-1246, United
States
- Graduate
Programs in Earth and Environmental Sciences and Biology, City University of New York Graduate Center, New York, New York 10016, United States
- Department
of Geography and Environmental Science, Hunter College, New York, New York 10065, United States
| | - Róisín Commane
- Lamont-Doherty
Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10027-6902, United
States
- Department
of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Columbia
University, New York, New York 10027, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu X, Cui Y, Li W, Li M, Li N, Shi Z, Dong J, Xiao X. Urbanization expands the fluctuating difference in gross primary productivity between urban and rural areas from 2000 to 2018 in China. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2023; 901:166490. [PMID: 37611713 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
Urban and rural vegetation are affected by both climate change and human activities, but the role of urbanization in vegetation productivity is unclear given the dual impacts. Here, we delineated urban area (UA) and rural area (RA), quantified the relative impacts of climate change and human activities on gross primary production (GPP) in 34 major cities (MCs) in China from 2000 to 2018, and analyzed the intrinsic impacts of urbanization on GPP. First, we found that the total urban impervious surface coverage (ISC) of the 34 MCs increased by 13.25 % and the mean annual GPP increased by 211 gC m-2 during the study period. GPP increased significantly in urban core areas, but decreased significantly in urban expansion areas, which was mainly due to a large amount of vegetation loss due to land use conversion. Second, the variability of GPP in UA was generally lower than in RA. Both climate change and human activities had a positive impact on GPP in UA and RA in the 34 MCs, of which the contribution was 49 % and 51 % in UA, and 76 % and 24 % in RA, respectively. Third, under climate change and human activities, the increase in GPP offset 4.96 % and 12.35 % of the impact of land use conversion on GPP in 2000 and 2018, respectively, which indicated that the offset strengthened over time. These findings emphasize the role of human activities in promoting carbon sequestration in urban vegetation, which is crucial for better understanding the processes and mechanisms of urban carbon cycles. Decision-makers can manage urban vegetation based on vegetation carbon sequestration potential as regions urbanize, aiding comprehensive decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyan Liu
- Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for the Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions (Henan University), Ministry of Education, Kaifeng 475001, Henan, China; School of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China; Dabieshan National Observation and Research Field Station of Forest Ecosystem at Henan, Zhengzhou 450046, China; Xinyang Ecological Research Institute, Xinyang 464000, China
| | - Yaoping Cui
- Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for the Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions (Henan University), Ministry of Education, Kaifeng 475001, Henan, China; School of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China; Dabieshan National Observation and Research Field Station of Forest Ecosystem at Henan, Zhengzhou 450046, China; Xinyang Ecological Research Institute, Xinyang 464000, China.
| | - Wanlong Li
- Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for the Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions (Henan University), Ministry of Education, Kaifeng 475001, Henan, China; School of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Mengdi Li
- Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for the Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions (Henan University), Ministry of Education, Kaifeng 475001, Henan, China; School of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Nan Li
- Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for the Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions (Henan University), Ministry of Education, Kaifeng 475001, Henan, China; School of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Zhifang Shi
- Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for the Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions (Henan University), Ministry of Education, Kaifeng 475001, Henan, China; School of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
| | - Jinwei Dong
- Institute of Geographical Sciences and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Xiangming Xiao
- Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, Center for Earth Observation and Modeling, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen Y, Huang B, Zeng H. How does urbanization affect vegetation productivity in the coastal cities of eastern China? THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2022; 811:152356. [PMID: 34921883 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Changes in terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP) caused by rapid urbanization may result in negative effects on ecosystem services and ecosystem health. These impacts are of great concern in coastal zones where rapid urbanization is predominant. Knowing how urbanization affects vegetation productivity will be helpful for policymakers to make decisions on urban vegetation and ecosystem management. In this study, we chose 48 cities along the coastal zone of eastern China to evaluate the impacts of urbanization on vegetation GPP. The spatiotemporal comparison was used to identify the changes in built-up lands and vegetation GPP for multiple years (2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015). The area percentage of built-up lands was used to define the urbanization density. It was found that: (1) the actual vegetation GPP changed in different patterns with urbanization gradient from low to high intensity, including straight declining, depressed, and reversed S shapes at the city scale. The vegetation GPP change due to urbanization include both direct impact that is resulted directly from the loss of green land, and indirect impact that is induced by the change of macro-environment associated with urbanization. The slope of direct impacts change from low to high urbanization intensity were - 0.917, -0.925, -0.933, -0.938 for 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015, respectively. The greater value means urban vegetation GPP loss faster as urbanization intensity increase. (2) A turning point on the maximum values for the indirect impacts was observed at approximately 0.8 of urbanization intensities, although it indicates both positive and negative value for the cities. However, no significant differences were observed for indirect impacts among provinces and coastal zones. The indirect impacts of urbanization on vegetation GPP were generally positive in the northern and middle coastal zones, and they were negative in the southern coastal zones. The results indicated that measures can be applied in the coastal cities in order to mitigate the negative impacts of urbanization on GPP. Our findings are helpful for policymakers to make decisions on urban planning and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yixin Chen
- School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China
| | - Baoying Huang
- School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China; Guangdong Provincial Academy of Environmental Science, China
| | - Hui Zeng
- School of Urban Planning and Design, Peking University, Shenzhen 518055, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Trlica A, Hutyra LR, Morreale LL, Smith IA, Reinmann AB. Current and future biomass carbon uptake in Boston's urban forest. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2020; 709:136196. [PMID: 31887518 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Revised: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Ecosystem services provided by urban forests are increasingly included in municipal-level responses to climate change. However, the ecosystem functions that generate these services, such as biomass carbon (C) uptake, can differ substantially from nearby rural forest. In particular, the scaled effect of canopy spatial configuration on tree growth in cities is uncertain, as is the scope for medium-term policy intervention. This study integrates high spatial resolution data on tree canopy and biomass in the city of Boston, Massachusetts, with local measurements of tree growth rates to estimate the magnitude and distribution of annual biomass C uptake. We further project C uptake, biomass, and canopy cover change to 2040 under alternative policy scenarios affecting the planting and preservation of urban trees. Our analysis shows that 85% of tree canopy area was within 10 m of an edge, indicating essentially open growing conditions. Using growth models accounting for canopy edge effects and growth context, Boston's current biomass C uptake may be approximately double (median 10.9 GgC yr-1, 0.5 MgC ha-1 yr-1) the estimates based on rural forest growth, much of it occurring in high-density residential areas. Total annual C uptake to long-term biomass storage was equivalent to <1% of estimated annual fossil CO2 emissions for the city. In built-up areas, reducing mortality in larger trees resulted in the highest predicted increase in canopy cover (+25%) and biomass C stocks (236 GgC) by 2040, while planting trees in available road margins resulted in the greatest predicted annual C uptake (7.1 GgC yr-1). This study highlights the importance of accounting for the altered ecosystem structure and function in urban areas in evaluating ecosystem services. Effective municipal climate responses should consider the substantial fraction of total services performed by trees in developed areas, which may produce strong but localized atmospheric C sinks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Trlica
- Boston University, Department of Earth & Environment, 685 Commonwealth Ave., Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Lucy R Hutyra
- Boston University, Department of Earth & Environment, 685 Commonwealth Ave., Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Luca L Morreale
- Boston University, Department of Earth & Environment, 685 Commonwealth Ave., Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Ian A Smith
- Boston University, Department of Earth & Environment, 685 Commonwealth Ave., Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Andrew B Reinmann
- Environmental Sciences Initiative, CUNY Advanced Science Research Center, 85 Saint Nicholas Terr., New York, NY, USA; PhD Program in Earth and Environmental Science, The Graduate Center, CUNY, 365 First Ave., Room 4306, New York, NY, USA; Department of Geography and Environmental Science, Hunter College, 695 Park Ave., Room 1006 HN, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|