1
|
Itenberg ER, Lozano AM. Surgical and Interventional Management of Liver Metastasis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2024; 37:80-84. [PMID: 38322597 PMCID: PMC10843883 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers diagnosed worldwide. While the incidence of colorectal cancer has been declining since the adoption of screening colonoscopy, the findings of liver metastasis are still found in up to 25% of patients at diagnosis. The management of liver metastasis has evolved over the past two to three decades, and survival rates have improved secondary to improved systemic therapy, surgical options, and local therapies. In this article, we aim to review the available surgical and ablative options for management of colorectal liver metastasis, as well as appropriate imaging and patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin R. Itenberg
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Ana M. Lozano
- Department of General Surgery, Henry Ford Macomb Hospital, Clinton Township, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang H, Ruan Q, Chen C, Yu H, Guan S, Hu D, Yang C, Lin R, Zhuo C. Activin A/ACVR2A axis inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in colon cancer by activating SMAD2. Mol Carcinog 2023; 62:1585-1598. [PMID: 37378449 DOI: 10.1002/mc.23601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Liver metastasis is the major direct cause of colorectal cancer-related deaths. Although radical resection is the most effective treatment for colorectal cancer liver metastasis, several patients are not eligible for surgery. Therefore, there is a need to develop novel treatments based on the understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying liver metastasis in colorectal cancer. This study demonstrated that activin A/ACVR2A inhibits colon cancer cell migration and invasion, as well as suppresses the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of mouse colon cancer cells. This finding has been further validated in animal experiments. Mechanistic studies revealed that activin A binds to Smad2 (instead of Smad3) and activates its transcription. Analysis of the paired clinical samples further confirmed that the expression levels of ACVR2A and SMAD2 were the highest in adjacent healthy tissues, followed by primary colon cancer tissues and liver metastasis tissues, suggesting that ACVR2A downregulation may promote colon cancer metastasis. Bioinformatics analysis and clinical studies demonstrated that ACVR2A downregulation was significantly associated with liver metastasis and poor disease-free and progression-free survival of patients with colon cancer. These results suggest that the activin A/ACVR2A axis promotes colon cancer metastasis by selectively activating SMAD2. Thus, targeting ACVR2A is a potential novel therapeutic strategy to prevent colon cancer metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Zhang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiang Ruan
- College of Chemistry, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Changjiang Chen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Hui Yu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Shen Guan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Dan Hu
- Department of Pathology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Chunkang Yang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine and Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Biotherapy, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Ruirong Lin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine and Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Biotherapy, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| | - Changhua Zhuo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Translational Cancer Medicine and Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Biotherapy, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Choong K, Wong P, Thornblade L, Melstrom K, Lai L, Kaiser A, Singh G, Warner SG, Fakih M, Fong Y, Melstrom LG. Combined Liver and Colon Resection of Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases at a Quaternary Center. J Surg Res 2023; 288:252-260. [PMID: 37030183 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Existing literature on the safety of combined liver and colorectal resections for synchronous colorectal liver metastases is mixed. Using a retrospective review of our institutional data, we aimed to show that combined colorectal and liver resections for synchronous metastases is both feasible and safe in a quaternary center. METHODS A retrospective review of combined resections for synchronous colorectal liver metastases at a quaternary referral center from 2015 to 2020 was completed. Clinicopathologic and perioperative data was collected. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify risk factors for major postoperative complications. RESULTS One hundred one patients were identified, with 35 undergoing major liver resections ( ≥ 3 segments) and 66 undergoing minor liver resections. The vast majority of patients (94%) received neoadjuvant therapy. There was no difference in postoperative major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3+) between major and minor liver resections (23.9% versus 12.1%, P = 0.16). On univariate analysis, Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) score >1 (P < 0.05) was predictive of major complication. However, on multivariable regression analysis, no factor was associated with significantly increased odds of major complication. CONCLUSIONS This work demonstrates that with thoughtful patient selection, combined resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases can be safely performed at a quaternary referral center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Choong
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Paul Wong
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Lucas Thornblade
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Kurt Melstrom
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Lily Lai
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Andreas Kaiser
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Gagandeep Singh
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Susanne G Warner
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Marwan Fakih
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Yuman Fong
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California
| | - Laleh G Melstrom
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Calderon Novoa F, Ardiles V, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Goransky J, Mazza O, Sánchez Claria R, de Santibañes M. Pushing the Limits of Surgical Resection in Colorectal Liver Metastasis: How Far Can We Go? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072113. [PMID: 37046774 PMCID: PMC10093442 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, and up to 50% of all patients diagnosed will develop metastatic disease. Management of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has been constantly improving, aided by newer and more effective chemotherapy agents and the use of multidisciplinary teams. However, the only curative treatment remains surgical resection of the CRLM. Although survival for surgically resected patients has shown modest improvement, this is mostly because of the fact that what is constantly evolving is the indication for resection. Surgeons are constantly pushing the limits of what is considered resectable or not, thus enhancing and enlarging the pool of patients who can be potentially benefited and even cured with aggressive surgical procedures. There are a variety of procedures that have been developed, which range from procedures to stimulate hepatic growth, such as portal vein embolization, two-staged hepatectomy, or the association of both, to technically challenging procedures such as simultaneous approaches for synchronous metastasis, ex-vivo or in-situ perfusion with total vascular exclusion, or even liver transplant. This article reviewed the major breakthroughs in liver surgery for CRLM, showing how much has changed and what has been achieved in the field of CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Calderon Novoa
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Victoria Ardiles
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Eduardo de Santibañes
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Juan Pekolj
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Jeremias Goransky
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Oscar Mazza
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Rodrigo Sánchez Claria
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| | - Martín de Santibañes
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1199, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Griffiths CD, Karanicolas P, Gallinger S, Wei AD, Francescutti V, Serrano PE. Health-Related Quality of Life Following Simultaneous Resection for Synchronous Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:1331-1338. [PMID: 36350458 PMCID: PMC11005481 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12696-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Up to 25% of colorectal cancer patients present with synchronous liver metastases that can be treated with two operations or a single 'simultaneous' operation. Morbidity and mortality appear similar between approaches, however changes in health-related quality-of-life following simultaneous resection are not well reported. METHODS A prospective, feasibility trial for simultaneous resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastases was conducted. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and LMC21 at baseline (preoperatively), and 4 and 12 weeks postoperatively. Week 4 and 12 scores were compared with baseline using t-tests. Minimally important clinical differences were considered as a 10-point difference from baseline. RESULTS C30 and QLQ-LMC21 were completed at baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks by 39 (95%), 35 (85%) and 34 (83%) patients, and 39 (95%), 33 (80%) and 33 (80%) patients, respectively; 79% and 75% had at least one MICD according to QLQ-C30 at 4 and 12 weeks. At 4 weeks, physical functioning (mean difference (MD) - 11.9%, p = 0.002), role functioning (MD - 23.6, p = 0.007), and pain (MD + 19.7, p = 0.017) had significant worsening from baseline. At 12 weeks postoperatively, role functioning (MD - 19.7, p = 0.011) and fatigue (MD + 14.3, p = 0.03) were the only domains that remained significantly worse. By 12 weeks, pain and physical functioning had returned to baseline. There were no major demographic differences among those with and without an MICD at 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous resection of colorectal liver metastases led to clinically significant worsening fatigue and role functioning that persisted at 12 weeks post-surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C D Griffiths
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - P Karanicolas
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S Gallinger
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - A D Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, NY, USA
| | - V Francescutti
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - P E Serrano
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
- Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
A comparison of the simultaneous, liver-first, and colorectal-first strategies for surgical treatment of synchronous colorectal liver metastases at two major liver-surgery institutions in Sweden. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:26-36. [PMID: 36167765 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal treatment strategy for patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of the simultaneous, liver-first, and colorectal-first surgical approaches. METHODS All consecutive patients who had been resected with curative intent for CRLM were included. A Cox regression model was constructed, and an intention-to-treat analysis was performed between the liver-first and the simultaneous approaches, after propensity score matching. RESULTS 658 patients were included in the analysis. 92 patients had a simultaneous resection, 163 patients had liver-first, and 403 patients had a colorectal-first approach. Overall survival was 54.9 months (95% CI 39.2-70.4) in the liver-first group, 54.5 months (95% CI 46.8-62.3) in colorectal-first group, and 59.6 months (95% CI 42.2-77.0) in the simultaneous group (log-rank p =0.850). In the matched cohort there were no differences in Clavien-Dindo 3a (p = 0.992) or 3b and greater (p = 0.999). Median overall survival was for liver-first group 42.2 months (95% CI 26.3-58.2), and for the simultaneous group 56.2 months (95% CI 47.1-65.4) (stratified log-rank p = 0.455). CONCLUSION A simultaneous approach was not associated with worse overall survival or morbidity compared to a liver-first approach.
Collapse
|
7
|
Jiang YJ, Zhou SC, Chen JH, Liang JW. Oncological outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: A result from a propensity score matching study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:951540. [DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.951540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in treating resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remain controversial.MethodsData from CRLM patients who underwent simultaneous liver resection between January 2015 and December 2019 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (SEER cohort, n=305) and a single Chinese Cancer Center (NCC cohort, n=268). Using a 1:2 ratio of propensity score matching (PSM), the prognostic impact of NAC for patients who underwent NAC before surgical treatment and patients who underwent surgical treatment alone was evaluated.ResultsAfter PSM, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between patients receiving NAC prior to CRLM resection and those undergoing surgery only, in both the NCC and SEER cohorts (each P > 0.05). Age was an independent predictor of OS only in the SEER cohort (P = 0.040), while the pN stage was an independent predictor for OS only in the NCC cohort (P = 0.002). Furthermore, Disease-free survival (DFS) was comparable between the two groups in the NCC cohort. In a subgroup analysis, the DFS and OS in the NAC- group were significantly worse than those in the NAC+ group for patients with more than two liver metastases in the NCC cohort (P < 0.05 for both).ConclusionNAC did not have a significant prognostic impact in patients with resectable synchronous CRLM. However, patients with more than two liver metastases could be good candidates for receiving NAC.
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen Q, Zhang Y, Deng Y, Huang Z, Zhao H, Cai J. Outcomes of simultaneous resection for elderly patients with colorectal liver metastasis: A propensity score matching analysis. Cancer Med 2022; 11:4913-4926. [PMID: 35608250 PMCID: PMC9761077 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence on simultaneous resection for elderly patients (age ≥ 70 years) with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is lacking. METHODS Four hundred and eighty-two CRLM patients treated by simultaneous resection were categorised into young group (age < 70 years) and elderly group (age ≥ 70 years). Propensity score matching (PSM1) was performed to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics and compare short-term outcomes. An additional propensity score matching (PSM2) including short-term outcomes was performed to analyse survival. Subgroup analysis was performed in patients stratified by the Clinical Risk Score (CRS). RESULTS After PSM1, 87 young group patients were matched to 50 elderly group patients. Patients in the elderly group had a significantly higher rate of overall post-operative complications (68.0% vs. 46.0%, p = 0.013). After PSM2, 89 young group patients were matched to 47 elderly group patients. Progression-free survival (PFS) was comparable between the two groups (median 11.0 months vs. 9.8 months, p = 0.346). Age ≥ 70 independently predicted worse overall survival (OS) (Hazard ratio, HR = 2.57, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.37-4.82) in multivariate analysis. In the subgroup multivariate analysis of patients with CRS score 3-5, age ≥ 70 was independently associated with worse PFS (HR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.01-2.62) and OS (HR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.26-4.35). CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous resection for elderly CRLM patients is acceptable. Further studies are required to determine the optimal treatment for elderly CRLM patients with high CRS scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qichen Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Yizhou Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Yiqiao Deng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Zhen Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Hong Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | - Jianqiang Cai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Karam E, Bucur P, Gil C, Sindayigaya R, Tabchouri N, Barbier L, Pabst-Giger U, Bourlier P, Lecomte T, Moussata D, Chapet S, Calais G, Ouaissi M, Salamé E. Simultaneous or staged resection for synchronous liver metastasis and primary rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:201. [PMID: 35448953 PMCID: PMC9026992 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02250-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in France and by the time of the diagnosis, 15–25% of patients will suffer from synchronous liver metastases. Surgery associated to neoadjuvant treatment can cure these patients, but few studies focus only on rectal cancer. This study was meant to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent a simultaneous resection to those who underwent a staged resection (rectum first or liver first) in the University Hospital of Tours, France. Methods We assessed retrospectively a prospective maintained data base about the clinical, pathological and survival outcomes of patients who underwent a simultaneous or a staged resection in our center between 2010 and 2018. A propensity score matching was used, considering the initial characteristics of our groups. Results There were 70 patients (55/15 males, female respectively) with median age 60 (54–68) years. After matching 48 (69%) of them underwent a staged approach and 22 (31%) a simultaneous approach were compared. After PSM, there were 22 patients in each group. No differences were found in terms of morbidity (p = 0.210), overall survival (p = 0.517) and disease-free survival (p = 0.691) at 3 years after matching. There were significantly less recurrences in the simultaneous group (50% vs 81.8%, p = 0.026). Conclusions Simultaneous resection of the rectal primary cancer and synchronous liver metastases is safe and feasible with no difference in terms of survival. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02250-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias Karam
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Avenue de La République, Chambray les Tours, France
| | - Petru Bucur
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Avenue de La République, Chambray les Tours, France
| | - Camille Gil
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Avenue de La République, Chambray les Tours, France
| | - Remy Sindayigaya
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Avenue de La République, Chambray les Tours, France
| | - Nicolas Tabchouri
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Avenue de La République, Chambray les Tours, France
| | - Louise Barbier
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Avenue de La République, Chambray les Tours, France
| | - Urs Pabst-Giger
- EA4245 Transplantation, Immunologie, Inflammation, Université de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Pascal Bourlier
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Avenue de La République, Chambray les Tours, France
| | - Thierry Lecomte
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Trousseau Hospital, Chambray les Tours, France
| | - Driffa Moussata
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Trousseau Hospital, Chambray les Tours, France
| | - Sophie Chapet
- Department of Radiotherapy, Bretonneau Hospital, Tours, France
| | - Gilles Calais
- Department of Radiotherapy, Bretonneau Hospital, Tours, France
| | - Mehdi Ouaissi
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Avenue de La République, Chambray les Tours, France.
| | - Ephrem Salamé
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Digestive, Oncological, Endocrine, Hepato-Biliary, Pancreatic and Liver Transplant Surgery, Trousseau Hospital, Avenue de La République, Chambray les Tours, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Choi M, Han DH, Choi JS, Choi GH. Can the presence of KRAS mutations guide the type of liver resection during simultaneous resection of colorectal liver metastasis? Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2022; 26:125-132. [PMID: 35431183 PMCID: PMC9136426 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.21-127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims It is generally accepted that non-anatomical resection (NAR) in colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has comparable safety and efficacy compared to anatomical resection (AR); however, there are reports that AR may have better outcomes in KRAS mutated CRLM. This study aimed to determine the effects of KRAS mutations and surgical techniques on survival outcomes in CRLM patients. Methods Two hundred fifty patients who underwent hepatic resection of CRLM with known KRAS mutational status between 2007 and 2018 were analyzed. A total of 94 KRAS mutated CRLM and 156 KRAS wild-type CRLM were subdivided by surgical approach and compared for short- and long-term outcomes. Results In both KRAS wild-type and mutated type, there was no difference in estimated blood loss, postoperative complications, and 30-day mortality. There was no difference in disease-free survival (DFS) between AR and NAR in both groups (p = 0.326, p = 0.954, respectively). Finally, there was no difference in intrahepatic DFS between AR and NAR groups in both the KRAS groups (p = 0.165, p = 0.516, respectively). Conclusions The presence of KRAS mutation may not be a significant factor when deciding the approach in simultaneous resection of CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Munseok Choi
- Department of Surgery, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - Dai Hoon Han
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Sub Choi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rakić M, Šabić A, Kliček R, Amić F, Kolovrat M, Đuzel A. Laparoscopic synchronous resection of rectal cancer and liver metastases: A case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 2022; 92:106900. [PMID: 35255420 PMCID: PMC8902603 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.106900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction and importance During the past decade, there are several studies which showed the advantages of the laparoscopic approach for treating colorectal cancer (CRC) or colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM). However, in contrast, there are only a few reports of combined one stage synchronous laparoscopic colorectal and liver metastasis resection, cold one stage minimally invasive approach (MIA). Case presentation Our patient was 51 years old woman. Rectal adenocarcinoma was verified three centimeters from the anal verge. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with rectal protocol modification indicated T1N0MO stage. We decided to do transanal local excision and achieved R0 resection. Half a year after the operation on the control MRI, lymphadenopathy was found along the rectum and possible recurrence of cancer. Also on the MRI was shown solitary, 4.7 × 2.7 × 3.8 cm big metastasis in the IVa/VIII segment of the liver. The patient was shown on a multidisciplinary team and it was decided to do laparoscopic synchronous resection of rectum and liver metastases. Clinical discussion During the last decades many articles with different strategies for treating CRC and liver metastasis were published. Some of them prefered two-stage surgical treatment, like liver first approach which allows initial control of liver metastases, and delivery of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer without the fear that liver metastases will meanwhile progress beyond the possibility of cure. Alternatively, the colon first approach is where the adjuvant chemotherapy is combined with the resection of the primary colorectal tumour with liver resection being undertaken (if at all) as a subsequent operation. By developing surgery, anaesthesia and critical care, the one stage approach for patients with CRC and liver metastasis started to be a reasonable option. Conclusion Totally laparoscopic synchronous resection of the colorectal cancer and synchronous colorectal liver metastasis is technically feasible and safe in the hands of the experienced abdominal surgeon. This type of approach offers all the benefits of the laparoscopic minimally invasiveness associated with good oncological outcomes, and it is indicated in well-selected patients. However, the real scientific answer to this question can be given just with randomised control trial which will be a real challenge for endoscopic surgeons in the future. Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the world. TLSR of the colorectal cancer and SCRLM is technically feasible and safe in the hands of the experienced abdominal surgeon This type of approach offers all the benefits of the laparoscopic minimally invasiveness associated with good outcomes
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mislav Rakić
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ante Šabić
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia.
| | - Robert Kliček
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Fedor Amić
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Marijan Kolovrat
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Antonija Đuzel
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Serrano PE, Parpia S, Karanicolas P, Gallinger S, Wei AC, Simunovic M, Bhandari M, Levine M. Simultaneous resection for synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases: A feasibility clinical trial. J Surg Oncol 2022; 125:671-677. [PMID: 34878649 PMCID: PMC9896571 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES We tested the feasibility of a simultaneous resection clinical trial in patients with synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases to obtain the necessary information to plan a randomized trial. METHODS Multicenter feasibility single-arm trial enrolling patients with synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases eligible for simultaneous resection. Prespecified criteria for feasibility were: proportion of eligible patients enrolled ≥66%, and the proportion of enrolled patients who completed simultaneous resection ≥75%. The prespecified 90-day major postoperative complication rate was 30%. RESULTS Of 61 eligible patients from February 2017 to August 2019, 41 were enrolled (67%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 55%-78%), 32 underwent simultaneous resection (78%; 95% CI, 63%-88%). Four patients were not enrolled due to the surgeon's preference, three were due to the complexity of resection (right hepatectomy and low anterior resection). Intraoperative complications during liver resection (n = 4) and progression of disease (n = 4) were the main reasons for not undergoing simultaneous resection. The 90-day incidence of major complications was 41% (95% CI, 16%-58%) and the 90-day postoperative mortality was 6% (95% CI, 1.7%-20%). CONCLUSION According to prespecified criteria, enrolling patients with synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases to a trial of simultaneous resection is feasible; however, it is associated with higher than anticipated 90-day postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo E. Serrano
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada,Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sameer Parpia
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada,Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul Karanicolas
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Division of General Surgery, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven Gallinger
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Department of Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alice C. Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Marko Simunovic
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada,Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mohit Bhandari
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada,Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Levine
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada,Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada,Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chen Q, Deng Y, Chen J, Zhao J, Bi X, Zhou J, Li Z, Huang Z, Zhang Y, Chen X, Zhao H, Cai J. Impact of Postoperative Infectious Complications on Long-Term Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Simultaneous Resection for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 11:793653. [PMID: 35071001 PMCID: PMC8776635 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.793653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of postoperative infectious complications (POI) on the long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) after simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases. METHODS Four hundred seventy-nine CRLM patients receiving simultaneous resection between February 2010 and February 2018 at our hospital were enrolled. A 1:3 propensity score matching analysis (PSM) analysis was performed to balance covariates and avoid selection bias. After PSM, 90 patients were distributed to the POI group, and 233 patients were distributed to the no POI group. A log-rank test was performed to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) data. A multivariate Cox regression model was employed to identify prognostic factors influencing OS and PFS. A value of two-sided P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS Compared to patients in the no POI group, patients in the POI group were more likely to have hepatic portal occlusion (78.9% vs. 66.3%, P=0.021), operation time ≥325 min (61.1% vs. 48.1%, P=0.026), and intraoperative blood loss ≥200 ml (81.1% vs. 67.6%, P=0.012). In multivariate analysis, intraoperative blood loss ≥200 ml (OR = 2.057, 95% CI: 1.165-3.634, P=0.013) was identified as the only independent risk factor for POI. Patients with POI had a worse PFS (P<0.001, median PFS: 7.5 vs. 12.7 months) and a worse OS (P=0.010, median OS: 38.8 vs. 59.0 months) than those without POI. After 1:3 PSM analysis, no differences in clinicopathologic parameters were detected between the POI group and the no POI group. Patients with POI had a worse PFS (P=0.013, median PFS: 7.5 vs. 11.1 months) and a worse OS (P=0.020, median OS: 38.8 vs. 59.0 months) than those without POI. Multivariate analysis showed that POI was an independent predictor for worse PFS (HR=1.410, 95% CI: 1.065-1.869, P=0.017) and worse OS (HR=1.682, 95% CI: 1.113-2.544, P=0.014). CONCLUSIONS POI can significantly worsen the long-term outcomes of CRLM patients receiving simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases and should be considered to improve postoperative management and make better treatment decisions for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qichen Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yiqiao Deng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jinghua Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianjun Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xinyu Bi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianguo Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiyu Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhen Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yefan Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianqiang Cai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Guerra F, Petrelli F, Greco PA, Sisti V, Catarci M, Montalti R, Patriti A. The impact of synchronous liver resection on the risk of anastomotic leakage following elective colorectal resection. A propensity score match analysis on behalf of the iCral study group. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2021; 47:2873-2879. [PMID: 34119377 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION how best to manage patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastasis is still controversial, with specific concerns of increased risk of postoperative complications following combined resection. We aimed at analyzing the influence of combined liver resection on the risk of anastomotic leak (AL) following colorectal resection. METHODS we reviewed the iCral prospectively maintained database to compare the relative risk of AL of patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer to that of patients receiving simultaneous liver and colorectal resection for cancer with isolated hepatic metastases. The incidence of AL was the primary outcome of the analysis. Perioperative details and postoperative complications were also appraised. RESULTS out of a total of 996 patients who underwent colorectal resection for cancer, 206 receiving isolated colorectal resection were compared with a matched group of 53 patients undergoing simultaneous liver and colorectal resection. Combined surgery had greater operative time and resulted in longer postoperative hospitalization compared to colorectal resection alone. The proportion of overall morbidity following combined resection was significantly higher than after isolated colorectal resection (56.6% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.021). Overall, the two groups of patients did not differ neither on the rate of major postoperative complications, nor in terms of AL (9.4% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.381). At specific multivariate analysis, the duration of surgery was the only risk factor independently associated with the likelihood of AL. CONCLUSIONS combining hepatic with colorectal resection for the treatment of synchronous liver metastasis from colorectal cancer does not increase significantly the incidence of AL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Guerra
- Division of General Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy.
| | - Filippo Petrelli
- Division of General Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | | | - Valerio Sisti
- Division of General Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Marco Catarci
- Division of General Surgery, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Montalti
- Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University, Napoli, Italy
| | - Alberto Patriti
- Division of General Surgery, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Driedger MR, Yamashita TS, Starlinger P, Mathis KL, Smoot RL, Cleary SP, Nagorney DM. Synchronous resection of colorectal cancer primary and liver metastases: an outcomes analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:1277-1284. [PMID: 33541806 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concurrent resection of the primary cancer and synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) was evaluated for differences in outcomes following stratification of both the liver and colorectal resection. METHODS Consecutive cases of synchronous resection of both the CRC primary and CRCLM were reviewed retrospectively at a single, high-volume institution over a 17-year period (2000-2017). RESULTS 273 patients underwent simultaneous resection of CRCLM. The distribution of the primary lesion was similar between the colon (52.4%) and rectum (47.6%), while 46.9% of patients had bilobar liver disease. Major liver/major colorectal resection (n = 24) were significantly more likely to experience colorectal specific morbidity (OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.56-10.15, p = 0.004), liver specific morbidity (OR 7.4, 95% CI 2.22-24.71, p = 0.001), total morbidity (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.18-7.18, p = 0.020) and 90-day mortality (OR 5.50, 95% CI 1.27-23.81, p = 0.023). Failure to receive adjuvant chemotherapy secondary to postoperative morbidity was associated with significantly worsened survival (HR for death 5.91, 95% CI 1.59-22.01, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Postoperative morbidity precluding the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with an increase in mortality. Combining a major liver with major colorectal resection is associated with a significant increase in major morbidity and 90-day mortality, and should be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Driedger
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Thomas S Yamashita
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Patrick Starlinger
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kellie L Mathis
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Rory L Smoot
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sean P Cleary
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David M Nagorney
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
McGuirk M, Gachabayov M, Rojas A, Kajmolli A, Gogna S, Gu KW, Qiuye Q, Dong XD. Simultaneous Robot Assisted Colon and Liver Resection for Metastatic Colon Cancer. JSLS 2021; 25:JSLS.2020.00108. [PMID: 34248343 PMCID: PMC8249220 DOI: 10.4293/jsls.2020.00108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Simultaneous robot assisted colon and liver resections are being performed more frequently at present due to the expanded adoption of the robotic platform for surgical management of metastatic colon cancer. However, this approach has not been studied in detail with only case series available in the literature. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current body of evidence on the feasibility of performing simultaneous robotic colon and liver resections. Methods A systematic review was performed through PubMed to identify relevant articles describing simultaneous colon and liver resections for metastatic colon cancer. Results A total of 28 patients underwent simultaneous resections robotically with an average operative time of 420.3 minutes and average blood loss of 275.6 ml. Postoperative stay was 8.6 days on average with all cases achieving negative surgical margins. Conclusions Robotic simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer with liver metastases is technically feasible and seems oncologically equivalent to open or laparoscopic surgery. Further studies are urgently needed to assess benefits of robotic surgery in the patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew McGuirk
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College
| | - Mahir Gachabayov
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College
| | - Aram Rojas
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College
| | - Agon Kajmolli
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College
| | - Shekhar Gogna
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College
| | - Katie W Gu
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College
| | - Qian Qiuye
- Department of Surgery, Nuvance Health-Whittingham Cancer Center
| | - Xiang Da Dong
- Department of Surgery, Nuvance Health-Whittingham Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wu Y, Guo T, Xu Z, Liu F, Cai S, Wang L, Xu Y. Risk scoring system for recurrence after simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer liver metastasis. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:966. [PMID: 34277766 PMCID: PMC8267263 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-2595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background The simultaneous resection of synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis (SCRLM) has been widely applied. It is necessary to establish a risk scoring system to predict post-operative recurrence, especially in patients with neoadjuvant treatment. Methods The medical records of 221 patients undergoing simultaneous resection of CRLM were assessed in this study with a further 128 patients allocated to a validation group. All patients in the study group were classified according to their history of neoadjuvant treatment and univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to study independent risk factors. A score model was then generated according to the factors included. Our data set were also applied to validate three other existing scoring models [Fong clinical recurrence score (CRS), Konopke, and Zakaria disease-free survival (DFS) score], and the concordance index was calculated for comparison among these models. Results CRLM involving more than three nodes positive for a primary tumor was considered an independent risk factor for progression in patients without neoadjuvant treatment and all score models could discretely stratify patients according to disease free survival. In patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment, CRLM involving more than one node and transfusion invasion were major determinants in patients after treatment. However, only our scoring system and Fong’s CRS score could discretely discriminate patients. In the validation group, patients were significantly classified with the score system. Conclusions Existing score models had better values for determining prognosis in patients with SCRLM, especially in those undertaking neoadjuvant treatment. Larger cohorts, along with more detailed clinical features and multicenter validation should be undertaken before utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuchen Wu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tianan Guo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhenhong Xu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Fangqi Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sanjun Cai
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lu Wang
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Ye Xu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Båverud Olsson L, Buchli C, Villard C, Nilsson PJ. Differences in management and outcome for colon and rectal carcinoma with synchronous liver metastases: a population-based cohort study. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:860-867. [PMID: 33259702 PMCID: PMC8246906 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Surgical treatment of colorectal cancer with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCRLM) can follow three different strategies with regard to the timing of liver resection. The aim of this study was to describe the selection of surgical strategy, focusing on differences between colon and rectal cancer with SCRLM, postoperative morbidity/mortality and survival. METHOD This was a retrospective population-based study of patients with SCRLM registered in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry in the Stockholm/Gotland region during 2010-2017 and treated with surgical resection of the primary tumour and liver metastases (LM). Patients were followed for 5 years or censored at 22 November 2018. RESULTS A total of 238 patients met the inclusion criteria during the study period. Patients with rectal cancer were treated with the 'liver first' strategy in 70% of cases, whereas the main treatment strategies for colonic tumours were 'simultaneous resection' (44%) and 'primary first' (37%). Rectal cancer had a superior 5-year survival rate compared with colon tumours with SCRLM (62 vs. 47%; p = 0.033). There was no difference in survival between treatment strategies irrespective of primary tumour location. Postoperative complications occurred most commonly among rectal tumours treated with simultaneous resection (p = 0.024). CONCLUSION Patients with rectal cancer and SCRLM were more often treated with the 'liver first' strategy than patients with colon cancer. Patients with rectal cancer and SCRLM where both primary tumour and LM were operated on had significantly better survival than corresponding patients with colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisen Båverud Olsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Christian Buchli
- Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden,Centre for Digestive DiseasesKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Christina Villard
- Department of Medicine HuddingeUnit of Gastroenterology and RheumatologyKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Per J. Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and SurgeryKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden,Centre for Digestive DiseasesKarolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Simultaneous approach for patients with synchronous colon and rectal liver metastases: Impact of site of primary on postoperative and oncological outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 47:842-849. [PMID: 33011004 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS We aimed to investigate the impact of the site of the primary on postoperative and oncological outcomes in patients undergone simultaneous approach for colon (CC) and rectal cancer (RC) with synchronous liver metastases (SCRLM). PATIENTS AND METHODS Of the 220 patients with SCRLM operated on between Mar 2006 and Dec 2017, 169 patients (76.8%) were treated by a simultaneous approach and were included in the study. Two groups were considered according to the location of primary tumor RC-Group (n = 47) and CC-group (n = 122). RESULTS Multiple liver metastases were observed in 70.2% in RC-Group and 77.0% in CC-Group (p = 0.233), whilst median Tumor Burden Score (TBS) was 4.7 in RC-Group and 5.4 CC-Group (p = 0.276). Severe morbidity (p = 0.315) and mortality at 90 days (p = 0.520) were comparable between RC-Group and CC-Group. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was similar comparing RC-Group and CC-Group (48.2% vs. 45.3%; p = 0.709), but it was significantly different when considering left-CC, right-CC and RC separately (54.5% vs. 35.2% vs. 48.2%; p = 0.041). Primary tumor location (right-CC, p = 0.001; RC, p = 0.002), microscopic residual (R1) disease at the primary (p < 0.001), TBS ≥6 (p = 0.012), bilobar metastases (p = 0.004), and chemotherapy strategy (preoperative ChT, p = 0.253; postoperative ChT, p = 0.012; and perioperative ChT, p < 0.001) resulted to be independent prognostic factors at multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION In patients with SCRLM, simultaneous resection of the primary tumor and liver metastases seems feasible and safe and allows satisfactory oncological outcomes both in CC and RC. Right-CC shows a worse prognosis when compared to left-CC and RC.
Collapse
|
20
|
Taesombat W, Kanjanasilp P, Nonthasoot B, Sutherasan M, Vorasittha A, Sirichindakul B. Benefits of simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal surgery and liver resection for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: Retrospective case-matched study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2020; 58:120-123. [PMID: 32983430 PMCID: PMC7494584 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer and liver tumors are accepted as alternative procedure to open surgery. However, few studies reported outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic surgery of these two procedures. The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach. Materials and methods Between June 2010 to December 2019, simultaneous laparoscopic cases were retrospectively matched (1:2) to open cases. Peri-operative and short-term outcomes were compared between both groups. Results Twelve patients in laparoscopic group were matched to 24 patients in open group according to age, gender, body mass index, american society of anesthesiologists physical status, preoperative laboratory data, number and size of liver metastases and extent of colorectal and liver resection, Most patients in each group had left-sided colon or rectal cancer and underwent wedge liver resection. The mean number of liver metastases was 1.3 vs 1.5 and size of liver metastases was 2.2 ± 1.4 vs 2.7 ± 1.1 cm in laparoscopic compared to open group. Estimated blood loss and length of hospital stay were significantly lower in laparoscopic group. However, operative time was significantly longer in laparoscopic group. Peri-operative complication was not significant difference between both groups and there was no mortality. Conclusion Simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal surgery and minor liver resection is feasible and safe. Laparoscopic approach has better peri-operative outcome in term of shorter length of hospital stay compared to open approach. Outcome of simultaneous laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases remains controversy. This study showed comparable peri-operative outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic compared to open surgery. Simultaneous laparoscopic surgery had shorter length of hospital stay and less operative blood loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wipusit Taesombat
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Prapon Kanjanasilp
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Bunthoon Nonthasoot
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Methee Sutherasan
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Athaya Vorasittha
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Boonchoo Sirichindakul
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Sultana A, Ferris G, Mwendwa J, Mohamedahmed AYY, Zaman S, Peravali R. Simultaneous versus staged colorectal and hepatic resections for colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases: a meta-analysis of outcomes and clinical characteristics. Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:1629-1650. [PMID: 32653951 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03694-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the comparative outcomes and clinical characteristics of simultaneous and staged colorectal and hepatic resections for colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases. METHODS We conducted a systematic search of electronic information sources, and bibliographic reference lists. Perioperative morbidity and mortality, anastomotic leak, wound infection, bile leak, bleeding, intra-abdominal abscess, sub-phrenic abscess, reoperation, recurrence, 5-year overall survival, procedure time, and length of hospital stay were the evaluated outcome parameters. Combined overall effect sizes were calculated using random-effects model. RESULTS We identified 41 comparative studies reporting a total of 12,081 patients who underwent simultaneous (n = 5013) or staged (n = 7068) resections for colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases. There were significantly lower use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.003), higher right-sided colonic resections (p < 0.00001), and minor hepatic resections (p < 0.00001) in the simultaneous group. The simultaneous resection was associated with significantly lower rate of bleeding (OR 0.60, p = 0.03) and shorter length of hospital stay (MD - 5.40, p < 0.00001) compared to the staged resection. However, no significant difference was found in perioperative morbidity (OR1.04, p = 0.63), mortality (RD 0.00, p = 0.19), anastomotic leak (RD 0.01, p = 0.33), bile leak (OR 0.83, p = 0.50), wound infection (OR 1.17, p = 0.19), intra-abdominal abscess (RD 0.01, p = 0.26), sub-phrenic abscess (OR 1.26, p = 0.48), reoperation (OR 1.32, p = 0.18), recurrence (OR 1.33, p = 0.10), 5-year overall survival (OR 0.88, p = 0.19), or procedure time (MD - 23.64, p = 041) between two groups. CONCLUSIONS Despite demonstrating nearly comparable outcomes, the best available evidence (level 2) regarding simultaneous and staged colorectal and hepatic resections for colorectal cancer with synchronous hepatic metastases is associated with major selection bias. It is time to conduct high-quality randomised studies with respect to burden and laterality of disease. We recommend the staged approach for complex cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahin Hajibandeh
- Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Shahab Hajibandeh
- Department of General Surgery, Glan Clwyd Hospital, Rhyl, Denbighshire, UK
| | - Abida Sultana
- Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gabriella Ferris
- Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Josiah Mwendwa
- Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Shafquat Zaman
- Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rajeev Peravali
- Department of General Surgery, Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Management strategies for patients with advanced rectal cancer and liver metastases using modified Delphi methodology: results from the PelvEx Collaborative. Colorectal Dis 2020; 22:1184-1188. [PMID: 32043753 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM A total of 15-20% of patients with rectal cancer have liver metastases on presentation. The management of these patients is controversial. Heterogeneity in management strategies is considerable, with management often being dependent on local resources and available expertise. METHOD Members of the PelvEx Collaborative were invited to participate in the generation of a consensus statement on the optimal management of patients with advanced rectal cancer with liver involvement. Fifteen statements were created for topical discussion on diagnostic and management issues. Panellists were asked to vote on statements and anonymous feedback was given. A collaborative meeting was used to discuss any nuances and clarify any obscurity. Consensus was considered when > 85% agreement on a statement was achieved. RESULTS A total of 135 participants were involved in the final round of the Delphi questionnaire. Nine of the 15 statements reached consensus regarding the management of patients with advanced rectal cancer and oligometastatic liver disease. Routine use of liver MRI was not recommended for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, unless there was concern for metastatic disease on initial computed tomography staging scan. Induction chemotherapy was advocated as first-line treatment in those with synchronous liver metastases in locally advanced rectal cancer. In the presence of symptomatic primary disease, a diverting stoma may be required to facilitate induction chemotherapy. Overall, only one-quarter of the panellists would consider simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection. CONCLUSION This Delphi process highlights the diverse treatment of advanced rectal cancer with liver metastases and provides recommendations from an experienced international group regarding the multidisciplinary management approach.
Collapse
|
23
|
Pérez-Santiago L, Dorcaratto D, Garcés-Albir M, Muñoz-Forner E, Huerta Álvaro M, Roselló Keranën S, Sabater L. The actual management of colorectal liver metastases. MINERVA CHIR 2020; 75:328-344. [PMID: 32773753 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4733.20.08436-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent cancers in the world and between 50% and 60% of patients will develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) during the disease. There have been great improvements in the management of CRLM during the last decades. The combination of modern chemotherapeutic and biological systemic treatments with aggressive surgical resection strategies is currently the base for the treatment of patients considered unresectable until few years ago. Furthermore, several new treatments for the local control of CRLM have been developed and are now part of the arsenal of multidisciplinary teams for the treatment of these complex patients. The aim of this review was to summarize and update the management of CRLM, its controversies and relevant evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leticia Pérez-Santiago
- Unit of Liver, Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Clinic Hospital, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Dimitri Dorcaratto
- Unit of Liver, Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Clinic Hospital, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain -
| | - Marina Garcés-Albir
- Unit of Liver, Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Clinic Hospital, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Elena Muñoz-Forner
- Unit of Liver, Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Clinic Hospital, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Marisol Huerta Álvaro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Clinic Hospital, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Susana Roselló Keranën
- Department of Medical Oncology, Clinic Hospital, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Luis Sabater
- Unit of Liver, Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Clinic Hospital, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Predicting liver metastases growth patterns: Current status and future possibilities. Semin Cancer Biol 2020; 71:42-51. [PMID: 32679190 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is highly incident worldwide and presents a health burden with elevated mortality rate despite prevention, detection, and treatment, mainly due to metastatic liver disease. Histological growth patterns of colorectal cancer liver metastases have emerged as a reproducible prognostic factor, with biological implications and therapeutic windows. Nonetheless, the histological growth patterns of colorectal cancer liver metastases are only known after pathological examination of a liver resection specimen, thus limiting the possibilities of pre-surgical decision. Predicting the histological growth pattern of colorectal cancer liver metastases would provide valuable information for patient-tailored medicine. In this article, we perform a review of the histological growth patterns and their implications, with a focus on the possibilities for their prediction.
Collapse
|
25
|
Nitsche U, Weber C, Kaufmann B, von Figura G, Assfalg V, Miller G, Friess H, Hüser N, Hartmann D. Simultaneous Versus Staged Resection of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study. J Surg Res 2020; 255:346-354. [PMID: 32599454 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastasis, either a simultaneous, or a two-staged resection of the primary tumor and the liver metastases is possible. There are currently no guidelines preferring one approach to the other. MATERIAL AND METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent hepatic resection at our university hospital from 2007-2016 were included. Clinical, histopathologic, serologic, and survival data were analyzed. The primary end point was tumor-specific survival for patients with simultaneous versus staged resections. RESULTS Of all 140 patients, 68 underwent simultaneous resection and 72 underwent staged resection. The characteristics of both groups were comparable. Patients with simultaneous resections had a shorter duration of cumulative operation time (299 versus 460 min; P = 0.003) and a shorter cumulative length of hospital stay (23 versus 43 d; P = 0.002). Perioperative mortality (P = 0.257) did not differ significantly; however, patients with simultaneous resections had higher rates of grade 2 complications according to Clavien-Dindo (P < 0.001). Tumor-specific 1-y survival was 85 ± 5% for simultaneous and 83 ± 5% for staged resection (P = 0.631). On multivariable analysis, pT4 (P = 0.038), pN3 (P = 0.003), and G3/4 (P = 0.041) of the primary tumor and postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo 3/4/5, P = 0.003) were poor prognostic factors regarding tumor-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS This is one of the largest and most thoroughly documented retrospective single-center studies of consecutive patients with synchronous hepatic metastases. Simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer together with hepatic metastases is a safe procedure in selected patients and does not have a significant influence on long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrich Nitsche
- Department of Surgery, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Constance Weber
- Department of Surgery, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikt Kaufmann
- Department of Surgery, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Guido von Figura
- Department of Medicine II, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Volker Assfalg
- Department of Surgery, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Gregor Miller
- Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Helmut Friess
- Department of Surgery, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Norbert Hüser
- Department of Surgery, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Hartmann
- Department of Surgery, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases; a practice survey. HPB (Oxford) 2020; 22:728-734. [PMID: 31601509 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Revised: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We examined surgeon practice intentions and barriers to performing simultaneous resections for colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases. METHODS We electronically surveyed North American surgeons who provide colorectal cancer care with a pilot-tested questionnaire. Four clinical scenarios of increasing complexity were presented. Perceived outcomes of and barriers to simultaneous resection were assessed on a 7-point Likert scale. We compared results between general and hepatobiliary surgeons. RESULTS Responses (rate 20%, 234/1166) included 50 general and 134 hepatobiliary surgeons. High likelihood scores for support of simultaneous resection among general and hepatobiliary surgeons, respectively, included the following for: minor liver and low complexity colon, 83% and 98% (p < 0.001); minor liver and rectal resection, 57% and 73% (p = 0.042); complex liver and low complexity colon resection, 26% and 24% (p = 0.858); and, complex liver and rectal resection, 11% and 7.0% (p = 0.436). Among hepatobiliary surgeons, the most common barriers to simultaneous resections were patient comorbidities and lung metastases, whereas certain general surgeons additionally identified transfer of care. CONCLUSIONS Surgeon support for simultaneous resection was high for cases with minor hepatectomy, and low for cases involving major hepatectomy. These results suggest that clinical trials should involve patients with limited disease to evaluate post-operative complications and cost.
Collapse
|
27
|
Wang J, Griffiths C, Simunovic M, Parpia S, Gu CS, Gafni A, Ruo L, Hallet J, Bogach J, Serrano PE. Simultaneous versus staged resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases: A population-based cost analysis in Ontario, Canada - Health economic evaluation. Int J Surg 2020; 78:75-82. [PMID: 32335234 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Simultaneous compared to staged resection of synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases is considered safe. We aimed to determine their cost implications. STUDY DESIGN Population-based cohort was generated by linking administrative healthcare datasets in Ontario, Canada (2006-2014). Resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases within six months was considered synchronous. Cost analysis was performed from the perspective of a third-party payer. Median costs with range were estimated using the log-normal distribution of cost using t-test with a one-year time horizon. RESULTS Among patients undergoing staged resection (n = 678), the estimated median cost was $54,321 CAD (IQR 45,472 to 68,475) and $41,286 CAD (IQR 31,633 to 58,958) for those undergoing simultaneous resection (n = 390), median difference: $13,035 CAD (p < 0.001). Primary cost driver were all costs related to hospitalization for liver and colon resection, which was higher for the staged approach, median difference: $16,346 CAD (p < 0.001). This was mainly due to a longer median length of hospital stay in the staged vs. simultaneous group (11 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001 respectively), which was not attributable to differences in major postoperative complication rates (23% vs. 28%, p = 0.067 respectively). Other costs, including cost of chemotherapy within six months of surgery ($11,681 CAD vs. $8644 CAD, p = 0.074 respectively) and 90-day re-hospitalization cost ($2155 CAD vs. $2931 CAD, p = 0.454 respectively) were similar between groups. CONCLUSION Cost of staged resection of synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases is significantly higher compared to the simultaneous approach, mostly driven by a longer length of hospital stay despite similar postoperative complication rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Wang
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Marko Simunovic
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Sameer Parpia
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Chu-Shu Gu
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Amiram Gafni
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evaluation and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Leyo Ruo
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Julie Hallet
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jessica Bogach
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pablo E Serrano
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Snyder RA, Hao S, Irish W, Zervos EE, Tuttle-Newhall JE, Parikh AA. Thirty-Day Morbidity after Simultaneous Resection of Colorectal Cancer and Colorectal Liver Metastasis: American College of Surgeons NSQIP Analysis. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 230:617-627.e9. [PMID: 32007534 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 20% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) present with synchronous liver metastases (CRLM). The decision to resect simultaneously or sequentially remains controversial. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether simultaneous resection of CRC and CRLM is associated with increased complications compared to isolated resection. STUDY DESIGN Prospective data from the American College of Surgeons (ACS) NSQIP, including the ACS NSQIP procedure-specific colectomy and hepatectomy modules from 2014 to 2017, were reviewed in a retrospective cohort study. Primary study outcome was combined 30-day complication rates; secondary outcomes included colectomy and hepatectomy-specific complication. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to control for confounding factors associated with postoperative complication. RESULTS A total of 23,643 patients underwent colectomy, 7,462 hepatectomy, and 592 simultaneous resection for CRC and CLRM. Overall morbidity was higher among patients treated with simultaneous resection (29.9%) compared with either isolated colorectal (22.2%) or hepatic resection (17.1%; p < 0.001). Additionally, postoperative ileus (36.4% vs 19.1%) and anastomotic failure (7.9% vs 3.8%) were more common after simultaneous resection compared with colorectal resection (p < 0.05). Similarly, rates of bile leak (8.3% vs 6.2%, p = 0.195) and post-hepatectomy liver failure (8.7% vs 3.8%, p < 0.001) were higher after simultaneous resection compared with isolated hepatectomy. By multivariable logistic regression, simultaneous resection was associated with increased overall complication compared with isolated colon (odds ratio 1.64 [95% CI 1.36 to 1.96]) or liver resection (odds ratio 2.11 [95% CI 1.75 to 2.55]), as well as increased procedure-specific complication. CONCLUSIONS Although simultaneous resection offers definitive resection for patients with synchronous CRC and CRLM, it is associated with significantly increased 30-day overall and procedure-specific postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Snyder
- Department of Surgery, The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC; Department of Public Health, The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - Scarlett Hao
- Department of Surgery, The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - William Irish
- Department of Surgery, The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - Emmanuel E Zervos
- Department of Surgery, The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - Janet E Tuttle-Newhall
- Department of Surgery, The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - Alexander A Parikh
- Department of Surgery, The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bogach J, Wang J, Griffiths C, Parpia S, Saskin R, Hallet J, Ruo L, Simunovic M, Serrano PE. Simultaneous versus staged resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases: A population-based cohort study. Int J Surg 2019; 74:68-75. [PMID: 31843676 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Revised: 11/28/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer may be resected simultaneously with the primary or as a second staged operation. We evaluated trends of resection for synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases and associated patient outcomes. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study that included patients undergoing resection for synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases from 2006 to 2015 in the province of Ontario, Canada (population 13 million). Simultaneous resections occurred on the same admission, while staged resections occurred less than 6 months apart. Outcomes included postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and overall survival. Kaplan Meier survival estimates, Cox proportional hazard models and logistic regression were used. RESULTS Among 2,738 patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases, 1168 (42%) had synchronous disease. Of these, 442 resections were simultaneous (38%) and 776 were staged (62%). The proportion of synchronous disease among patients undergoing resection increased on average 3% per year (p = 0.02). For simultaneous versus staged resection, respectively, median length of hospital stay was shorter (8 vs. 11 days, p < 0.001); rate of major liver resections was lower (17% vs. 65%, p < 0.001), major postoperative complications were similar (28% vs. 23%, p = 0.067), and 90-day post-operative mortality was higher (6% vs. 1%, p < 0.001). Chemotherapy was administered more commonly among patients undergoing staged resections (91% vs. 76%, p < 0.001). Simultaneous resection was associated with a lower median overall survival (40 months, 95%CI 35-46 vs. 78 months, 95%CI 59-86). Risk factors for lower survival included higher comorbidities, right-sided primary and simultaneous resection. CONCLUSION Simultaneous resection was associated with similar postoperative complications, higher postoperative mortality and poorer long-term survival. Prospective randomized trials can inform the role of simultaneous versus staged resection for synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Bogach
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Julian Wang
- Michael DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Sameer Parpia
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Refik Saskin
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Julie Hallet
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of General Surgery, Odette Cancer Centre - Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Leyo Ruo
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Marko Simunovic
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Pablo E Serrano
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chen X, Yan S, Zhao H, Zhang Y, Huang Z, Zhao J, Zhou J, Li Z, Bi X, Cai J. The safety and feasibility of a single incision in simultaneous resection for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2019; 7:547. [PMID: 31807529 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.93] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background The approach of performing a simultaneous resection for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases has been lauded universally, but the operation procedures have differences. In general, colorectal lesions are removed laparoscopically; however, some liver metastases cannot be resected under laparoscopy. For these patients, the traditional approach of performing a simultaneous resection which utilizes the inferior abdominal midline incision and the right subcostal incision is preferred. In this study, we assessed the safety and feasibility of the single right subcostal incision approach for patients with either rectal or sigmoid colon cancer and liver metastasis who underwent simultaneous resection. Methods A total of 85 patients with rectal or sigmoid colon cancer and liver metastases who underwent simultaneous resection from January 2012 to December 2016 in the Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences were identified. Clinicopathological data, as well as operative and perioperative outcomes, were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Results Overall, 42 patients were included in this study, 26 (61.9%) patients underwent simultaneous resection with a single surgical incision (right subcostal incision), and 16 (38.1%) underwent simultaneous resection with dual surgical incisions (inferior abdominal midline incision and right subcostal incision). Compared to the dual-incision approach, the single-incision approach had a shorter operation time (328.0 vs. 420.0 min, P=0.006) but had no significant differences in total hospitalization time, postoperative hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss, time of postoperative drainage tube extraction, time to the first postoperative bowel movement, and postoperative complications (P>0.05). Conclusions The single-incision approach (right subcostal incision) is feasible and safe for patients with either sigmoid colon or rectal cancer and liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Shida Yan
- Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Hong Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Yefan Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Zhen Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jianjun Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jianguo Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Zhiyu Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Xinyu Bi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jianqiang Cai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Results after simultaneous surgery and RFA liver ablation for patients with colorectal carcinoma and synchronous liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:2334-2339. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2019] [Revised: 06/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
|
32
|
Georgakis GV, Goldberg I, Sasson AR. Current Trends in the Surgical Management of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-019-00440-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
33
|
Barrett JR, Abbott DE. Combined Proctectomy and Hepatectomy for Metastatic Rectal Cancer: Safe for the Fit and Able-But for Everyone? Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:3803-3804. [PMID: 31190208 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07500-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- James R Barrett
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Clinical Science Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Daniel E Abbott
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Clinical Science Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Krell RW, D'Angelica MI. Treatment sequencing for simultaneous colorectal liver metastases. J Surg Oncol 2019; 119:583-593. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.25424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
35
|
Liver Metastases and Histological Growth Patterns: Biological Behavior and Potential Clinical Implications-Another Path to Individualized Medicine? JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2019; 2019:6280347. [PMID: 30930945 PMCID: PMC6413382 DOI: 10.1155/2019/6280347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2018] [Revised: 12/24/2018] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a major health burden and despite the recent advances in healthcare and screening programs, a great percentage of patients already present metastases once their disease is found. In those cases, liver surgery has an essential role, but even with neoadjuvant chemotherapy there is a high rate of intrahepatic recurrence. New prognostic factors are needed in order to decide the best surgical approach considering the biological behavior of the tumors in order to tailor the used therapies, moving towards individualized medicine/treatment. However, the majority of the factors described in literature are expensive, time consuming, and difficult to apply on a daily basis. Histological growth patterns have emerged over the past few years as a reproducible characteristic, an easy to apply one, and with very low costs since it only needs the standard Haematoxylin and Eosin stained slides of observation. In this article, we provide a review of the histological growth patterns of liver metastases and their prognostic significance, biological meaning, and therapeutic importance.
Collapse
|
36
|
Cortolillo N, Patel C, Parreco J, Kaza S, Castillo A. Nationwide outcomes and costs of laparoscopic and robotic vs. open hepatectomy. J Robot Surg 2018; 13:557-565. [PMID: 30484059 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0896-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The safety of hepatectomy continues to improve and it holds a key role in the management of benign and malignant hepatic lesions. Laparoscopic and robotic approaches to hepatectomy are increasingly utilized. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes and costs of laparoscopic and robotic vs. open approaches to hepatectomy and to determine the national nonelective postoperative readmission rate, including readmission to other hospitals. The Nationwide Readmission Database from 2013 to 2014 was queried for all patients undergoing hepatectomy. Patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomies were compared to patients undergoing open hepatectomy. Multivariate logistic regression was implemented to determine the odds ratios (OR) for non-elective readmission within 45 days. There were 10,870 patients who underwent hepatectomy from 2013 to 2014 and 724 (6.7%) were approached with laparoscopic or robotic technique. The robotic cohort had lower mean cost of the index admission ($24,983 ± $18,329 vs. open $32,391 ± $31,983, p < 0.001, 95% CI - 18,292 to 534), shorter LOS (4.5 ± 3.8 vs. lap 6.8 ± 6.0 vs. open 7.6 ± 7.7 days, p < 0.01), and were less likely to be readmitted within 45 days (7.9% vs. 13.0% lap vs. 13.8% open, p = 0.05). The robotic cohort was slightly younger (mean age 57.5 ± 13.5 vs. lap 60.1 ± 13.8 vs. open 58.9 ± 13.7, p < 0.05), and no significant differences were seen by Charlson Comorbidity Index. Anastomosis of hepatic duct to GI tract carried higher odds of mortality (OR 2.87, p < 0.01) and higher odds of readmission (OR 1.40, p < 0.01). LOS above 7 days increased odds of readmission (OR 2.24, p < 0.01). Nearly one-fifth of patients readmitted after hepatectomy present to a different hospital. Robotic hepatectomy was associated with favorable cost and readmission outcomes compared to laparoscopic and open hepatectomy patients, despite similar patient comorbid burdens and patient's age. Length of stay over 7 days and anastomosis of hepatic duct to GI tract are strong risk factors for readmission and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Cortolillo
- Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 5301 S. Congress Av, Atlantis, FL, 33462, USA.
| | - Chetan Patel
- Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 5301 S. Congress Av, Atlantis, FL, 33462, USA
| | - Joshua Parreco
- Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 5301 S. Congress Av, Atlantis, FL, 33462, USA
| | - Srinivas Kaza
- Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 5301 S. Congress Av, Atlantis, FL, 33462, USA
| | - Alvaro Castillo
- Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 5301 S. Congress Av, Atlantis, FL, 33462, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Xu F, Tang B, Jin TQ, Dai CL. Current status of surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6:716-734. [PMID: 30510936 PMCID: PMC6264988 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i14.716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2018] [Revised: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Liver metastasis (LM) is one of the major causes of death in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Approximately 60% of CRC patients develop LM during the course of their illness. About 85% of these patients have unresectable disease at the time of presentation. Surgical resection is currently the only curative treatment for patients with colorectal LM (CRLM). In recent years, with the help of modern multimodality therapy including systemic chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery, the outcomes of CRLM treatment have significantly improved. This article summarizes the current status of surgical treatment of CRLM including evaluation of resectability, treatment for resectable LM, conversion therapy and liver transplantation for unresectable cases, liver resection for recurrent CRLM and elderly patients, and surgery for concomitant hepatic and extra-hepatic metastatic disease (EHMD). We believe that with the help of modern multimodality therapy, an aggressive oncosurgical approach should be implemented as it has the possibility of achieving a cure, even when EHMD is present in patients with CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Splenic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Bin Tang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Splenic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Tian-Qiang Jin
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Splenic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Chao-Liu Dai
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Splenic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wu Y, Liu F, Song W, Liang F, Wang L, Xu Y. Safety evaluation of simultaneous resection of colorectal primary tumor and liver metastasis after neoadjuvant therapy: A propensity score matching analysis. Am J Surg 2018; 218:894-898. [PMID: 30268420 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2018] [Revised: 09/10/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Considering the surgical safety and perioperative complications, simultaneous resection after neoadjuvant therapy is not commonly recommended. METHODS A total of 253 patients were included in study. Comparison of the short-term outcomes was performed after propensity score adjustment in Group A (n = 96) and Group B (neoadjuvant therapy, n = 96). RESULTS There was no postoperative mortality. After matching, the differences from surgical confounders were well-balanced. Morbidity (15.6% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.981), and Clavien-Dindo grade of complications (p = 0.710) were similar. No difference was found when the complications were divided according to the origin (general, colorectal and hepatic). Length of the hospital stays also did not differ between the groups (p = 0.482). More importantly, there was no increase in the number of patients with delayed adjuvant treatment after surgery in Group B. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant treatment did not increase morbidity, length of hospital stays and influence adjuvant treatment after simultaneous resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuchen Wu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 130, Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Fangqi Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 130, Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Wang Song
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 130, Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Fei Liang
- Clinical Statistical Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 130, Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Lu Wang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 130, Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Ye Xu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 130, Dong An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kim BH, Park HJ, Kim K, Han SW, Kim TY, Jeong SY, Park KJ, Chie EK. Novel graded prognostic assessment for colorectal cancer patients with brain metastases. Int J Clin Oncol 2018; 23:1112-1120. [PMID: 30074104 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-018-1329-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is important to take into account potential prognostic factors to select patients with brain metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) who will benefit from active neurosurgical treatment. Therefore, we experimentally investigated our single institutional data to develop a novel CRC-specific graded prognostic assessment (GPA) and to help clinicians determine the optimal management. METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively reviewed the records of 107 patients with brain metastases from CRC who received any kind of treatment in our hospital and had sufficient clinical information. RESULTS The median overall survival was 5.2 months, and the 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 23.7 and 6.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of brain metastases ≥ 6, presence of neurologic symptoms, and elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen (≥ 30 ng/ml) were the independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival, while performance status was not. Based on this, we developed the CRC-specific GPA index and stratified patients into three categories. The median overall survival for patients with GPA scores of 0-0.5, 1.0-1.5, and 2.0-2.5 was 2.3, 4.3, and 12.7 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery ± whole-brain radiotherapy showed a better survival than palliative whole-brain radiotherapy alone in patients with high GPA scores. CONCLUSIONS We developed a novel CRC-specific GPA index, which could help physicians to stratify patients with brain metastases. Further efforts are needed to validate and improve this index.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byoung Hyuck Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hae Jin Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, 1071 Anyangcheon-ro, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, 07985, Republic of Korea.
| | - Sae-Won Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae-You Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Yong Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyu Joo Park
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eui Kyu Chie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
de Jong MC, Beckers RCJ, van Woerden V, Sijmons JML, Bemelmans MHA, van Dam RM, Dejong CHC. The liver-first approach for synchronous colorectal liver metastases: more than a decade of experience in a single centre. HPB (Oxford) 2018; 20:631-640. [PMID: 29456199 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2017] [Revised: 10/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The feasibility of the liver-first approach for synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has been established. We sought to assess the short-term and long-term outcomes for these patients. METHODS Outcomes of patients who underwent a liver-first approach for CRLM between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively evaluated from a prospective database. RESULTS Of the 92 patients planned to undergo the liver-first strategy, the paradigm could be completed in 76.1%. Patients with concurrent extrahepatic disease failed significantly more often in completing the protocol (67% versus 21%; p = 0.03). Postoperative morbidity and mortality were 31.5% and 3.3% following liver resection and 30.9% and 0% after colorectal surgery. Of the 70 patients in whom the paradigm was completed, 36 patients (51.4%) developed recurrent disease after a median interval of 20.9 months. The median overall survival on an intention-to-treat basis was 33.1 months (3- and 5-year overall survival: 48.5% and 33.1%). Patients who were not able to complete their therapeutic paradigm had a significantly worse overall outcome (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION The liver-first approach is feasible with acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality rates. Despite the considerable overall-survival-benefit, recurrence rates remain high. Future research should focus on providing selection tools to enable the optimal treatment sequence for each patient with synchronous CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mechteld C de Jong
- Department of Surgery - Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Rianne C J Beckers
- Department of Radiology - Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands; GROW - School for Oncology & Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Victor van Woerden
- Department of Surgery - Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Julie M L Sijmons
- Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences - Maastricht University, The Netherlands
| | - Marc H A Bemelmans
- Department of Surgery - Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- Department of Surgery - Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis H C Dejong
- Department of Surgery - Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands; NUTRIM - School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Current Trends on the Treatment Sequence for Colorectal Cancer with Liver Metastases. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-018-0402-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
42
|
Serrano PE, Gafni A, Parpia S, Ruo L, Simunovic M, Meyers BM, Reiter H, Wei A, Gallinger S, Karanicolas P, Hallet J, Devaud N, Levine M. Simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases (RESECT), a pilot study. Int J Surg Protoc 2018; 8:1-6. [PMID: 31851740 PMCID: PMC6913566 DOI: 10.1016/j.isjp.2018.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2017] [Revised: 01/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Traditionally, synchronous colorectal cancer and CRLM are resected separately. Many institutions have begun performing these procedures simultaneously. Minimal data support simultaneous resection including major liver resection. Complications will be investigated following simultaneous resection. This protocol will be implemented in 5 high-volume tertiary care centres worldwide.
Introduction The “traditional approach” to resect synchronous colorectal cancer with liver metastases (CRLM) is to perform staged resections. Many institutions perform simultaneous resection. Disadvantages to the simultaneous approach include longer operating room times, which may increase major postoperative complication rates. Data supporting simultaneous resection are limited to retrospective studies that are subject to selection bias. Therefore, we have proposed a single-arm prospective cohort pilot study to evaluate the postoperative complications following simultaneous resection of synchronous CRLM. Methods and analysis This single-arm study will be performed in five high-volume hepatobiliary centres to prospectively evaluate the following objectives: (1) To determine the 90-day postoperative complication rate of patients diagnosed with synchronous CRLM undergoing a simultaneous colorectal and liver resection, including major liver resections; (2) To determine the postoperative mortality rate at 90 days following index surgery; (3) To determine change in global health-related Quality of Life (QoL) following simultaneous resection at three months compared to baseline; and (4) To build a costing model for simultaneous resection, We will also evaluate the feasibility of performing combined resection in these patients by evaluating the number of eligible patients enrolled in the study and determining the reasons eligible patients were not enrolled. This protocol has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02954913). Ethics and dissemination This study has been provincially approved by the central research ethics board. Study results will inform the design a randomized controlled trial by providing information about the comprehensive complication index in this patient population used to calculate the sample size for the trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo E. Serrano
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Corresponding author at: Juravinski Hospital & Cancer Centre, 711 Concession St, B3 - Rm. 161, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3, Canada.
| | - Amiram Gafni
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sameer Parpia
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leyo Ruo
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marko Simunovic
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brandon M. Meyers
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, McMaster University, Canada
| | - Harold Reiter
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, McMaster University, Canada
| | - Alice Wei
- Department of General Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Steven Gallinger
- Department of General Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Canada
- Department of General Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Paul Karanicolas
- Department of Surgery Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Julie Hallet
- Department of Surgery Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Mark Levine
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, McMaster University, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zhang XF, Beal EW, Weiss M, Aldrighetti L, Poultsides GA, Bauer TW, Fields RC, Maithel SK, Marques HP, Pawlik TM. Timing of disease occurrence and hepatic resection on long-term outcome of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastasis. J Surg Oncol 2017; 117:171-181. [PMID: 28940257 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of timing of disease occurrence and hepatic resection on long-term outcome of neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM). METHODS A total of 420 patients undergoing curative-intent resection for NELM were identified from a multi-institutional database. Date of primary resection, NELM detection and resection, intraoperative details, disease-specific (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were obtained. RESULTS A total of 243 (57.9%) patients had synchronous NELM, while 177 (42.1%) developed metachronous NELM. On propensity score matching (PSM), patients with synchronous versus metachronous NELM had comparable DSS (10-year DSS, 76.2% vs 85.9%, P = 0.105), yet a worse RFS (10-year RFS, 34.1% vs 59.8%, P = 0.008). DSS and RFS were comparable regardless of operative approach (simultaneous vs staged, both P > 0.1). Among patients who developed metachronous NELM, no difference in long-term outcomes were identified between early (≤2 years, n = 102, 57.6%) and late (>2 years, n = 68, 42.4%) disease on PSM (both P > 0.1). CONCLUSIONS Patients with synchronous NELM had a higher risk of tumor recurrence after hepatic resection versus patients with metachronous disease. The time to development of metachronous NELM did not affect long-term outcome. Curative-intent hepatic resection should be considered for patients who develop NELM regardless of the timing of disease presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu-Feng Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Institute of Advanced Surgical Technology and Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.,Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Eliza W Beal
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Matthew Weiss
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Department of Surgery, Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Todd W Bauer
- Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Ryan C Fields
- Department of Surgery, Washington University, School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Hugo P Marques
- Department of Surgery, Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|