Surgical Management of Giant Hepatic Hemangioma: Single Center's Experience with 144 Patients

Clinical impact and role of major vessels involvement in laparoscopic resection for hepatic hemangioma

BACKGROUND

Severe bleeding remains a significant concern in laparoscopic resection for hepatic hemangioma. It is rarely reported that how the degree of major vessels involvement impacts on severe bleeding. The present study primarily aimed to analyze the impacts of the number of involved major vessels (NIMV) during laparoscopic surgery for hepatic hemangioma and evaluate the risk factors associated with increased bleeding.

METHODS

A database search was carried out for consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic resection for liver hemangiomas at our department from January 2018 to December 2023. The collected data included demographics, characteristics of the hemangiomas, laboratory data, operation method, surgical and postoperative variables.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the study. 42 patients were categorized into the group with NIMV < 2, while 30 patients were divided into the group with NIMV ≥ 2. The group with NIMV ≥ 2 demonstrated a significant correlation with special segments, involved multiple segments and diameter of the hemangiomas (P < 0.01). And the perioperative variables including the extent of resection, operative time, blood loss, Pringle maneuver times, postoperative stay, drainage tube duration, and postoperative liver function (ALT, AST) also showed significant differences between the two groups (P < 0.05). Notably, NIMV ≥ 2 was identified as the most important independent risk factor for intraoperative blood loss ≥ 500 ml in laparoscopic surgery for hepatic hemangioma (P = 0.011). For NIMV ≥ 2, the independent risk factor was special segments in multivariate analysis (P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

The involvement of multiple major vessels (NIMV ≥ 2) was significantly associated with special segments, resulting in increased intraoperative blood loss, operation difficulty, and delayed postoperative recovery. Moreover, it was identified as the single independent risk factor with a considerable risk for increased blood loss during laparoscopic resection for hepatic hemangioma.

Laparoscopic liver resection or enucleation for giant hepatic hemangioma: how to choose?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic treatment has been increasingly adopted for giant hepatic hemangioma (HH), but the role of liver resection or enucleation remains uncertain. The aim of this study is to compare the laparoscopic resection (LR) with laparoscopic enucleation (LE) for HH, and to provide evidence on how to choose the most suitable approach for HH.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of HH patients underwent laparoscopic treatment between March 2015 and August 2022 was performed. Perioperative outcomes were compared based on the surgical approaches, and risk factors for increased blood loss was calculated by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 127 patients in LR group and 287 patients in LE group were enrolled in this study. The median blood loss (300 vs. 200 mL, P < 0.001) was higher in LE group than that in LR group. Independent risk factors for blood loss higher than 400 mL were tumor size ≥ 10 cm, tumor adjacent to major vessels, tumor occupying right liver or caudate lobe, and the portal phase enhancement ratio (PER) ≥ 38.9%, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that LR was associated with less blood loss (155 vs. 400 mL, P < 0.001) than LE procedure in patients with high PER value. Both LR and LE approaches exhibited similar perioperative outcomes in patients with low PER value.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic treatment for HH could be feasibly and safely performed by both LE and LR. For patients with PER higher than 38.9%, the LR approach is recommended.

Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation vs. transcatheter arterial embolization for hepatic hemangiomas

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of large hepatic hemangiomas (LHH) (5-9.9 cm in diameter).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study retrospectively collected data from 82 patients with LHH treated at Chaoyang Central Hospital. The study analyzed the differences in postoperative efficacy, operative time, blood routine, liver and kidney function on the first day after surgery, postoperative hospitalization time and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in indicators such as white blood cell count, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and total bilirubin on the first day after surgery between the RFA group (39 cases) and the TACE group (43 cases) ( P  < 0.001). Compared to RFA, LHH patients treated with TACE had a general complication rate of 39.5% (vs. 43.6%; P  = 0.7), a procedure-related complication rate of 30.2% (vs. 59.0%; P  = 0.009), an effective rate at 6-12 months postoperatively of 55.8% (vs. 82.1%; P  = 0.01), an operating-time of 41.2 ± 14.9 min (vs. 100.8 ± 35.5 min; P  < 0.001) and hospitalization costs of 17052.7 ± 1364.8 yuan (vs. 30952.1 ± 4327.6 yuan; P  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that the efficacy of RFA in treating LHH is significantly superior to TACE. Microwave ablation and RFA appear to be safe treatments for LHH. The TACE group exhibited shorter operating-time, lower hospitalization costs and lower demands on cardiopulmonary function.

Transarterial embolization with bleomycin-lipiodol emulsion: a successful minimal invasive approach for giant liver hemangioma

Hemangiomas are most common benign liver tumor. Most patients have an excellent prognosis because of the small size and benign nature of tumor. On some occasions, giant liver hemangioma may cause symptoms and significant challenges due to its complication. We report a case of giant liver hemangioma treated with minimal invasive approach by transarterial embolization (TAE). Following three TAE sessions over a specific timeframe, the patient was successfully managed, addressing that TAE may be a useful alternative to hepatic surgery in such cases.

Rim 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake of hepatic cavernous hemangioma on positron emission tomography/computed tomography: A case report

BACKGROUND

Peripheral FDG accumulation in a hepatic hemangioma presenting in a patient with prolonged fever is rare. Therefore, clinicians should pay close attention to patients with hepatic mass.

CASE SUMMARY

A 54-year-old woman with a 4-wk history of daily fevers was admitted to our hospital. A whole body 18F-Fluordesoxyglucose (PET-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was performed to elucidate the source of the fever. However, whole body 18F-FDG PET/CT raised the suspicion of a malignant lesion because of peripheral FDG accumulation (SUVmax 3.5 g/mL) higher than that of the normal liver parenchyma (SUVmax 1.6 g/mL) surrounding a hypoactive area, and no other abnormalities were showed. Subsequently, the patient underwent liver mass resection. Histopathology showed a hepatic cavernous hemangioma with fatty infiltration around the lesion. The fever disappeared four days after surgery and the patient did not present any complications during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Fatty infiltration in the peripheral parts of hepatic cavernous hemangioma may lead to subacute inflammation which further activate the Kupffer cells. This may cause prolonged fever and peripheral rim FDG accumulation on PET/CT.

Hepatic Hemangioma: Review of Imaging and Therapeutic Strategies

Hepatic hemangiomas are the most common benign liver tumors. Typically, small- to medium-sized hemangiomas are asymptomatic and discovered incidentally through the widespread use of imaging techniques. Giant hemangiomas (>5 cm) have a higher risk of complications. A variety of imaging methods are used for diagnosis. Cavernous hemangioma is the most frequent type, but radiologists must be aware of other varieties. Conservative management is often adequate, but some cases necessitate targeted interventions. Although surgery was traditionally the main treatment, the evolution of minimally invasive procedures now often recommends transarterial chemoembolization as the treatment of choice.

Transarterial Bleomycin-Lipiodol Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Giant Hepatic Hemangiomas: An Assessment of Effectiveness

This study evaluates the effectiveness of superselective transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) using a bleomycin-lipiodol emulsion in treating giant hepatic hemangiomas. A retrospective review included 31 patients with a mean age of 53 ± 10.42 years who underwent TACE from December 2014 to October 2022, with follow-up imaging examinations to assess outcomes. Technical success was defined as successful embolization of all feeding arteries, and clinical success was defined as a reduction in hemangioma volume by 50% or more on follow-up imaging. This study observed a 100% technical success rate. Post-embolization syndrome was common, and two cases of asymptomatic hepatic artery dissection were noted. Clinical success was achieved in 80.6% of patients, with significant volume reduction observed in the majority. Conclusively, superselective transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with bleomycin-lipiodol emulsions is presented as a viable and effective treatment option for giant hepatic hemangiomas. With no procedure-related mortality and significant volume reduction in most cases, this method offers a promising alternative to surgical intervention. This study's findings suggest a need for further exploration and validation in larger-scale prospective studies.

Natural History of Hepatic Hemangiomas Larger Than 10 cm: Imaging Findings and Clinical Course of 22 Cases

INTRODUCTION

The natural history of a large hepatic hemangioma is important in determining the treatment strategy. Although several studies have assessed the natural history of hepatic hemangiomas, no study has focused on hepatic hemangiomas measuring >10 cm. The aim of this study was to assess the natural history of hepatic hemangiomas measuring >10 cm by evaluating imaging findings and clinical course.

METHODS

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports at Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan, between January 2001 and March 2023 were retrospectively searched to find adult patients with hepatic hemangiomas >10 cm. Patients who were followed up without treatment for over six months were included. The maximum diameter of the hepatic hemangioma was compared between the baseline and the final CT or MRI. The clinical course of the patients was evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (17 women, five men; median age, 51 years) were identified. The median diameter of hepatic hemangiomas in the baseline study was 114 mm. Two patients had abdominal distention at the time of the baseline imaging, whereas the others were asymptomatic. After follow-up without treatment (the median; 95.5 months), enlargement, no change, shrinkage of hepatic hemangioma was observed in six, 11, and five patients, respectively. The median growth rate of hepatic hemangiomas was 2.5 mm/year. Two patients underwent liver resection for hepatic hemangioma, while the others were followed up without treatment. In four patients, symptoms appeared or worsened. Two patients died: one patient died from prostate cancer progression; the cause of death for the other was not confirmed.

CONCLUSION

Hepatic hemangiomas show a slow growth rate during follow-up, and shrinkage is occasionally observed. Some patients experience new symptoms or aggravation of symptoms; however, deaths associated with hepatic hemangiomas are uncommon.

Risk factors analysis of surgical complications of hepatic hemangioma: a modified Clavien-Dindo classification-based study

PURPOSE

There are few studies on the risk factors of postoperative complications after surgical treatment of hepatic hemangioma (HH). This study aims to provide a more scientific reference for clinical treatment.

METHODS

The clinical characteristics and operation data of HH patients undergoing surgical treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University from January 2011 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected. All enrolled patients were divided into two groups based on the modified Clavien-Dindo classification: Major group (Grade II/III/IV/V) and Minor group (Grade I and no complications). Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was used to explore the risk factors for massive intraoperative blood loss (IBL) and postoperative Grade II and above complications.

RESULTS

A total of 596 patients were enrolled, with a median age of 46.0 years (range, 22-75 years). Patients with Grade II/III/IV/V complications were included in the Major group (n = 119, 20%), and patients with Grade I and no complications were included in the Minor group (n = 477, 80%). The results of multivariate analysis of Grade II/III/IV/V complications showed that operative duration, IBL, and tumor size increased the risk of Grade II/III/IV/V complications. Conversely, serum creatinine (sCRE) decreased the risk. The results of multivariate analysis of IBL showed that tumor size, surgical method, and operative duration increased the risk of IBL.

CONCLUSIONS

Operative duration, IBL, tumor size, and surgical method are independent risk factors that should be paid attention to in HH surgery. In addition, as an independent protective factor for HH surgery, sCRE should attract more attention from scholars.

Feasibility of laparoscopic enucleation for hemangioma in special hepatic segments

Background and aim

This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic enucleation for liver hemangioma in special hepatic segments.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 58 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for hepatic hemangioma at a single center from January 2016 to January 2022. Segments I, IVa, VII, and VIII are defined as special hepatic segments, attributing to the bad visualization and adjacent to important vessels such as hepatic veins and inferior vena cava that lead to a high risk in laparoscopic surgery. Patients were categorized into a special location group (SLG) and a normal location group (NLG) according to the location of hemangioma. General data, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared and analyzed.

Results

There were no significant differences in age (p = 0.288), gender (p = 0.331), body mass index (p = 0.168), the maximum diameter of hemangioma (p = 0.330), ASA risk grading (p = 0.615), and comorbidities (p > 0.05) between the two groups. The operation time (p < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001), and intraoperative blood transfusion rate (p = 0.047) were significantly higher in the SLG. The rate of conversion to laparotomy was higher in the SLG, but there was no significant difference (p = 0.089). In addition, the exhaust time (p = 0.03) and postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.01) were significantly shorter in the NLG. The postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups, and there were no perioperative deaths.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic enucleation of hemangioma in special hepatic segments is difficult and has a critical risk of massive bleeding during surgery. Meanwhile, it is also safe, feasible, and effective.

Effectiveness of microwave ablation for the treatment of hepatic hemangioma - meta-analysis and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

The treatment of hepatic hemangioma includes surgical resection, radiofrequency ablation and Transarterial embolization. However, complications, mortality and compromised effectiveness limit their applications. Microwaves with effective heating generation and short ablation time become a promising treatment. The aim of this study is to conduct systematic review and meta-analyses to evaluate the effectiveness of Microwave Ablation (MWA) for the treatment of hepatic hemangioma.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed. Main outcomes were defined as hemangioma decreases in diameters and volume changes post-MWA. Conventional random-effect meta-analysis technique was applied to analyze the pooled data, and meta-regression model was established to explore the association among factors.

RESULTS

There were nine studies with a total of 501 patients retrieved. The pooled estimate of mean differences and 95% CI of hemangioma decreases after MWA treatment in diameter and in volume change (%) were 3.009 cm and (1.856, 4.161), and 53.169% and (51.274, 55.065), respectively. The pooled estimates of liver enzyme, ALT and AST, elevation were 219.905 with 95%CI (160.860, 278.949) and 315.679 with 95%CI (226.961, 404.397), respectively. Major complications were defined as acute kidney injury (AKI), pleural effusion, diaphragmatic hernia, and jaundice that needed to be treated, and the pooled incidence was 0.017 with 95% CI of (0.006, 0.029). No mortality related to MWA was reported. Meta-regression showed ablation time was associated with pre-operative lesion size (p = .001).

CONCLUSION

MWA is effective and safe in treatment of hepatic hemangioma, and our study suggests that hemangioma size should be investigated in the future MWA pretreatment difficulty scoring system study.

The surgical outcomes and risk factors of giant hepatic haemangiomas: a single centre experience

Objective

To evaluate the safety of performing surgery on cavernous haemangiomas in the liver larger than 10 cm and establish preoperative predictors of intraoperative blood transfusion and morbidity.

Methods

A total of 373 patients with haemangiomas larger than 10 cm who underwent surgery in our hospital were retrospectively analysed. According to tumour diameter, the patients were divided into a giant haemangioma (GH) group (241 cases) (10 cm ≤ diameter < 15 cm) and an enormous haemangioma (EH) group (132 cases) (diameter ≥ 15 cm). Clinical parameters were then compared between the two groups.

Results

Compared with the GH group, the EH group had higher rates of leukopenia (10.6% vs. 4.5%), anaemia (26.5% vs. 15.7%), and thrombocytopenia (13.6% vs. 6.2%). The occlusion time in the EH group was longer than that in the GH group (26.33 ± 14.10 min vs. 31.85 ± 20.09 min, P < 0.01). The blood loss and blood transfusion in the EH group were greater than those in the GH group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the morbidity in the EH group was higher than that in the GH group (17.4% vs. 9.13%, P < 0.05). According to the results of the multivariable analysis, the operation time and size of the haemangioma may be independent risk factors for blood transfusion (P < 0.05). Additionally, the size of the haemangioma may be an independent risk factor associated with complications (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Enormous haemangioma is more likely to cause haematologic abnormalities than giant hepatic haemangioma. The risks of the operation and postoperative complications of enormous haemangioma are higher than those of giant hepatic haemangioma.

Comparison of Hepatectomy and Hemangiomas Stripping on Patients with Giant Hepatic Hemangiomas

Objective. To compare the value of a hepatectomy and hemangioma stripping on patients with giant hepatic hemangiomas. Methods. Seventy-four patients with giant hepatic hemangiomas were retrospectively analyzed from data collected from their hepatobiliary surgeries performed from June 2010 to June 2015 at the People’s Hospital of Ningxia and the general hospital affiliated with Ningxia Medical University. The patients were divided into a hepatectomy group (37 patients) and a hemangioma-stripping group (37 patients). Conditions of each group were compared before and after surgery and comprised of surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, duration of hepatic blood occlusion, and hospital stay. Any complications after surgery, such as pleural effusions, bile leakage, and abdominal hemorrhage, were also observed. Results. In the hemangioma-stripping group, the surgery time was 2.38 ± 0.93 h, intraoperative blood loss was 889.19 ± 756.37, blood transfusion amount was 723.78 ± 801.14, the duration of hepatic blood occlusion 26.84 ± 17.30 min, and hospital stay was 16.19 ± 5.01 d. In the hepatectomy group, surgery time was 3.26 ± 1.16 h, intraoperative blood loss was 1551.35 ± 1755.88 mL blood transfusion amount was 1693.24 ± 2117.72 mL, duration of hepatic blood occlusion was 26.84 ± 17.30 min, and hospital stay was 16.19 ± 5.01 d. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The pleural effusion incident rate in the former group was lower than that of the latter group, and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusions. Hemangiomas stripping is an effective method by which to cure hepatic hemangioma, with the advantages being a relatively easy surgery with less patient trauma, rapid recovery, and fewer complications. This method should be used more often in clinical settings.

Medium and Long-Term Outcome of Superselective Transcatheter Arterial Embolization with Lipiodol-Bleomycin Emulsion for Giant Hepatic Hemangiomas: Results in 241 Patients

Purpose: To evaluate the medium and long-term efficacy of superselective transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) with lipiodol−bleomycin emulsions (LBE) for giant hepatic hemangiomas. Methods: A total of 241 patients who had underwent TAE with LBE for hepatic hemangiomas from January 2010 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Blood tests were performed 3 and 7 days after TAE and procedural-related complications were recorded. The patients were followed up by enhanced CT or MRI imaging at 6, 12, 36, and 60 months post-TAE, respectively. Technical success of TAE was defined as successful embolization of all identifiable arteries supplying to the hemangiomas. Clinical success was defined as improvement of the abdominal symptoms and indications on the imaging examinations that the hemangiomas had decreased by more than 50% in maximum diameter. Results: TAE was performed successfully in all patients without serious complications. Improvement of the abdominal symptoms was recorded in 102/102 cases (100%). The reduction rate of the tumor maximum diameter with >50% at 6, 12, 36, and 60 months was 88.1% (190/210), 86.7% (170/196), 85.2% (124/142), and 86.5% (45/52), respectively. There was a significant change from pre-TAE to follow-up values in maximum diameter (p < 0.05). Conclusion: TAE with LBE was feasible and effective for giant hepatic hemangiomas. The reductions of the tumor maximum diameter with >50% at medium (≥3 years) and long-term (≥5 years) follow-up were satisfactory, with 85.2% and 86.5%, respectively.

Enucleation versus hepatectomy for hepatic hemangiomas: A meta-analysis

Objective

To compare the safety and efficacy of enucleation and hepatectomy for the treatment of hepatic hemangioma (HH).

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies evaluating enucleation versus hepatectomy for HH starting from the time of database creation to February 2022. Extraction of the data used in this study was done from the literature. The differences between the two surgical approaches were evaluated by comparing and analyzing the relevant data by means of meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 1,384 patients (726 underwent enucleation, and 658 with hepatectomy) were included in our meta-analysis from 12 studies. Enucleations were associated with favorable outcomes in terms of operation time [mean difference (MD): −39.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): −46.23, −33.30], blood loss (MD: −300.42, 95% CI: −385.64, −215.19), length of hospital stay (MD: −2.33, 95% CI: −3.22, −1.44), and postoperative complications (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.44–0.74). There were no differences between the groups in terms of patients needing transfusion (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.50, 1.42), inflow occlusion time (MD: 1.72, 95% CI: −0.27, 3.71), and 30-day postoperative mortality (OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.02–2.17).

Conclusion

Compared with hepatectomy, enucleation is found to be effective at reducing postoperative complications, blood loss, and operation time and shortening the length of hospital stay. Enucleation is similar to hepatectomy in terms of inflow occlusion time, 30-day postoperative mortality, and patients needing transfusing to hepatectomy.

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous sclerotherapy versus surgical resection in the treatment of large hepatic hemangiomas: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

It is no consensus on the best management for patients with large hepatic hemangiomas. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous sclerotherapy compared to surgical resection for large hepatic hemangiomas.

METHODS

A total of 89 patients with large hepatic hemangiomas from single center underwent either percutaneous sclerotherapy (n = 14) or surgical resection (n = 75) as first-line treatment was retrospectively studied, followed up for 9-24 months using ultrasound. Terms of intraoperative and postoperative information, postoperative complications, and treatment effectiveness were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Percutaneous sclerotherapy had shorter operative time (p < 0.001), less blood loss, lower rate of prophylactic abdominal drainage (97.3% vs. 0%, p < 0.001), fewer minor complications (48.0% vs. 7.1%, p < 0.01), shorter hospital stay (p < 0.001), lower hospital cost (p < 0.001), higher Alb level (p < 0.001) and lower postoperative clinical index including ALT, AST and WBC (p < 0.001 for both) than did surgical resection. The major complications were demonstrated no significant difference between the two groups. In addition, the mean maximum cross-sectional areas of hemangioma dropped from 5044.1 ± 2058.0 mm² to 1924.6 ± 1989.5 mm² (65.2% reduction) during 9-24 months follow-up (p < 0.001) in the percutaneous sclerotherapy group, while all patients in the surgical resection group achieved complete response.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous sclerotherapy is the preferred method for the treatment of large hepatic hemangioma over surgical resection when compared with the items of postoperative recovery, blood loss, complications, hospital stays, and lower hospital costs. The reduction of the maximum cross-sectional area of hepatic hemangioma in the percutaneous sclerotherapy group is satisfactory.

Location of Hemangioma is an Individual Risk Factor for Massive Bleeding in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy

Background and Objectives:

The scope of laparoscopic surgery has expanded to encompass hepatic resections, specifically hepatic hemangioma. The most serious intraoperative complication is bleeding, often requiring laparotomy. Because risk factors associated with such massive blood loss have not been well evaluated, the intent of this retrospective study was to analyze these risk factors associated with laparoscopic resection of hepatic hemangiomas.

Methods:

From June 1, 2011 to January 31, 2021, 140 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic surgery for hepatic hemangioma in our hospital. According to quantity of intraoperative blood loss, they were divided into massive (≥ 800 ml) and minor blood loss (< 800 ml) groups. Perioperative data were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses with logistic regression to identify the risk factors for potential massive blood loss during laparoscopic resection.

Results:

There were 24 and 116 patients in the massive and minor blood loss groups, respectively. Of four risk factors significantly associated with massive blood loss by univariate logistic regression analysis (location of hemangioma in the liver, postcaval or hepatic venous compression, hilar compression, and body mass index exceeding 28) the multifactorial logistic model identified only location in the liver of the hemangioma as statistically (P = 0.012) associated with intraoperative massive blood loss.

Conclusions:

Location of the hepatic hemangioma was the single statistically significant risk factor for massive blood loss during laparoscopic surgery for hepatic hemangioma. Of particular importance, location in Couinaud liver segments I, IVa, VII, and VIII necessitates precautions to mitigate the risk of massive blood loss.

Real-world data on the clinicopathological traits and outcomes of hospitalized liver hemangioma patients: a multicenter study

Background

There is currently a lack of consensus regarding the clinical features, diagnosis, treatment indications and options, and risk assessment of hepatic hemangioma patients.

Methods

This was a multicenter, real-world study that analyzed a large number of hepatic hemangioma cases in China and included patient data on epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment methods, and outcomes.

Results

A total of 5,143 patients hospitalized for hepatic hemangioma were included, of whom 34.42% were male and 65.58% were female. The age distribution was concentrated between 30 and 60 years old, accounting for 87.41% of the patients. Among the hepatic hemangioma patients, 60.8% had only one tumor, with the most common pathological type being cavernous hemangioma (96.07% of cases). The treatment motivations and indications included anxiety, obvious clinical symptoms, rapid tumor growth, unclear diagnoses and acute emergencies. Overall, 41.4% of the patients were treated for psychological reasons, while 30.59% were treated because they presented obvious (primarily nonspecific) clinical symptoms. Hepatic resection was the main therapeutic method and was based on various indications. There were a small number of patients with Kasabach-Merritt syndrome, according to its generally recognized definition.

Conclusions

Most patients in this study who were hospitalized for hepatic hemangioma did not meet the indications for requiring treatment. Surveillance is the recommended course of action for definitively diagnosed hepatic hemangioma, and a new classification system is needed to standardize the diagnosis of this condition.

Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic and open resection of benign liver tumours in the Netherlands: a nationwide analysis

BACKGROUND

Data on surgical outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) versus open liver resection (OLR) of benign liver tumour (BLT) are scarce. This study aimed to provide a nationwide overview of postoperative outcomes after LLR and OLR of BLT.

METHODS

This was a nationwide retrospective study including all patients who underwent liver resection for hepatocellular adenoma, haemangioma and focal nodular hyperplasia in the Netherlands from 2014 to 2019. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to compare 30-day overall and major morbidity and 30-day mortality after OLR and LLR.

RESULTS

In total, 415 patients underwent BLT resection of whom 230 (55.4%) underwent LLR. PSM for OLR and LLR resulted in 250 matched patients. Median (IQR) length of stay was shorter after LLR than OLR (4 versus 6 days, 5.0-8.0, p < 0.001). Postoperative 30-day overall morbidity was lower after LLR than OLR (12.0% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.043). LLR was associated with reduced 30-day overall morbidity in multivariable analysis (aOR:0.46, CI:0.22-0.95, p = 0.043). Both 30-day major morbidity and 30-day mortality were not different.

CONCLUSIONS

LLR for BLT is associated with shorter hospital stay and reduced overall morbidity and is preferred if technically feasible.

Imaging Characteristics and Management of Infected Hepatic Hemangioma: Case-in Discussion

Hepatic hemangiomas are the most common type of benign liver tumors. We present a case of an infected hepatic hemangioma, which posed a diagnostic challenge. A 43-year-old female presented with right upper quadrant pain after blunt force trauma and intentional weight loss. CT and MRI were done, showing a posterior right lobe liver mass. Imaging characteristics were thought to be suggestive of metastatic disease, with a differential diagnosis of abscess. Drainage and biopsy of the mass revealed Streptococcus sp. infection, and pathology showed a cavernous hemangioma with inflammation. Patients presenting with systemic symptoms and an indeterminate liver mass on imaging should be evaluated for infected hepatic hemangiomas. Biopsy may be needed to rule out cancer. Management may include surgical resection; however, antibiotics and percutaneous drainage can suffice, as in this case.

Spontaneous internal hemorrhage of a giant hepatic hemangioma with infection: a case report and literature review

Spontaneous internal hemorrhage from a hepatic hemangioma is rare. This case describes a 59-year-old woman who was hospitalized with recurrent cough and fever for 6 months. The doctor thought that she had pneumonia, but other infectious diseases could not be ruled out. Therefore, related tests were performed and strong antibiotics were used, but the symptom of fever was persistent and recurred. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) findings showed a right hepatic giant hemangioma with hemorrhage, while tuberculosis, liver abscess, and immune disease were excluded by the physician. Because the patient’s fever was associated with a large hepatic hemangioma, the patient was transferred to surgery. During treatment, the amount of bleeding increased, so she underwent a right hepatic hemangioma resection in the emergency department. Her postoperative fever symptoms subsequently resolved. Pathological examination confirmed hemorrhagic necrosis with infection in hepatic hemangioma. Follow-up showed that the patient was afebrile.

Laparoscopic hepatectomy is superior to open procedures for hepatic hemangioma

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) has become increasingly popular for liver neoplasms, but its safety and effectiveness remain controversial. Hepatic hemangiomas are the most common benign liver neoplasm; the main approaches to hepatic hemangiomas include open hepatectomy (OH) and LH. In this study, we compared early outcomes between patients undergoing OH and those with LH.

METHODS

Patients underwent OH or LH in our hospital for hepatic hemangiomas between December 2013 and December 2017 were enrolled. All patients underwent comprehensive preoperative evaluations. The clinicopathological index and risk factors of hemangioma resection were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 41 patients underwent OH while 53 underwent LH. There was no significant difference in any preoperative clinical variables, including liver function, prothrombin time, or platelet count. Hepatic portal occlusion time and operative time were 39.74 vs. 38.35 minutes (P = 0.717) and 197.20 vs. 203.68 minutes (P = 0.652) in the OH and LH groups, respectively. No mortality nor significant perioperative complications were observed between the two groups. In LH group, two cases were converted to OH, one for an oversized tumor and the other for hemorrhage. Compared with OH patients, those with LH had less blood loss (361.69 vs. 437.81 mL, P = 0.024), shorter postoperative hospital stay (7.98 vs. 11.07 days, P = 0.001), and lower postoperative C-reactive protein (43.63 vs. 58.21 mg/L, P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

LH is superior to OH in terms of postoperative recovery and blood loss for selected patients with hepatic hemangioma.

Surgical Management of Giant Hepatic Haemangioma - Need for Redefining the Nomenclature According to the Size

INTRODUCTION

Haemangiomas are the most common benign tumours of the liver. Most of them are asymptomatic. Giant hepatic haemangioma is defined as size greater than 5 cm in diameter. The surgical treatment for giant hepatic haemangioma is not very well defined and reported. Here we analysed the treatment outcome of giant hepatic haemangiomas and redefined the nomenclature according to the size and proposing an algorithm for management of all hepatic haemangiomas.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analyses of 6 giant hepatic haemangioma more than 10 cm in size treated by a single surgeon were included. The clinical characteristics, diagnosis, managements and outcomes were recorded. Review of literature was done for definitions, management strategies and outcome of giant haemangiomas and an algorithm was proposed.

RESULTS

Five patients were female and the mean age was 36.6 years (range 32 to 45). Pain abdomen was the most common symptoms (100%). Ultrasound abdomen was the initial diagnostic modality followed by contrast enhanced computed tomography. The mean size of haemangioma was 17.4cm (range 12cm to 32cm). Four patients had haemangioma in the left lobe and two had in the right lobe of liver. Formal hepatectomy was done in three patients and enucleation was done in three patients. The mean operating time was 3.66 hours (range 2.5 hours to 5 hours). The mean blood loss was 840ml (range 300ml to 1500ml). There was no surgical morbidity or mortality. On follow-up no haemangioma related complications are reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Giant hepatic haemangioma is mostly symptomatic. Hepatectomy and enucleation can be done without significant morbidity and mortality. There is a need for redefining the nomenclature of giant hepatic haemangiomas according to the size.

Proton beam therapy for a giant hepatic hemangioma: A case report and literature review

Background

Hepatic hemangiomas are benign tumors with a favorable prognosis, but giant hepatic hemangiomas can cause abdominal symptoms and are indicated for treatment. Most cases are treated with surgery, but radiotherapy has also been used. However, to date, there have been no reports of proton beam therapy for a hepatic hemangioma.

Case presentation

A 46-year-old woman had a tumor of 80 × 80 mm in the left medial lobe of the liver, which was diagnosed as a giant hemangioma based on the contrast pattern. Therapy was required for a giant hepatic hemangioma with symptoms, but the patient refused blood transfusion due to religious reasons, which made surgical resection difficult. Therefore, she was referred to our hospital for proton beam therapy. At her first visit, liver function was Child-Pugh A (5 points) and there was no elevation of tumor markers. Proton beam therapy of 28.6 Gy (RBE) given in 13 fractions was performed without interruption. The only observed acute radiation toxicity was Grade 1 dermatitis. One year after proton beam therapy, the hemangioma had significantly decreased, and a complete response has been maintained for 15 years based on ultrasound and MRI.

Conclusion

This case is the first reported use of proton beam therapy for a hepatic hemangioma. The outcome suggests that this treatment may be effective for a giant liver hemangioma.

Efficacy and factors affecting the choice of enucleation and liver resection for giant hemangioma: a retrospective propensity score-matched study

Background

Liver resection (LR) and enucleation (EN) are the main surgical treatment for giant hepatic hemangioma (HH), but how to choose the type of surgery is still controversial. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and the factors affecting the choice of open procedure for HH.

Methods

The data for patients with pathologically confirmed HH who underwent open surgery from April 2014 to August 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses with logistic regression were performed to disclose the factors associated with the choice of EN or LR. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to compare the efficacy of the two procedures.

Results

A total of 163 and 110 patients were enrolled in the EN and LR groups. Following 1:1 matching by PSM analysis, 66 patients were selected from each group. Centrally located lesions (OR: 0.131, 95% CI 0.070–0.244), tumors size > 12.1 cm (OR: 0.226, 95% CI 0.116–0.439) and multiple tumors (OR: 1.860, 95% CI 1.003–3.449) were independent factors affecting the choice of EN. There was no significant difference in the median operation time (156 vs. 195 min, P = 0.156), median blood loss (200 vs. 220 ml, P = 0.423), blood transfusion rate (33.3% vs. 33.3%, P = 1.000), mean postoperative feeding (3.1 vs. 3.3 d, P = 0.460), mean postoperative hospital stay (9.5 vs. 9.0 d, P = 0.206), or the major complication rates between the two groups.

Conclusions

Peripherally located lesions, tumors size ≤ 12.1 cm and multiple tumors were more inclined to receive EN. There was no significant difference in the efficacy of EN or LR.

Effectiveness of Transarterial Embolization in Treatment of Symptomatic Hepatic Hemangiomas: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the current evidence for the effectiveness of transarterial embolization (TAE) in treatment of symptomatic hepatic hemangiomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL and Scopus databases to identify studies of hepatic hemangiomas treated with transarterial embolization. Main outcome was defined as the mean difference between pre- and post-TAE hemangioma diameters. Treatment agents were categorized as Lipiodol based [bleomycin (L + BE), pingyangmycin (L + PYG) or ethanol (L + ethanol)] and non-Lipiodol based (polyvinyl-alcohol-only). Conventional random-effect meta-analysis technique was applied to analyze data.

RESULTS

Of 3080 initially inspected publications, 21 studies were included in the meta-analysis comprising of 1450 patients with total of 1871 hemangiomas (36.2% male, mean age: 46.3 ± 3.6 years). One hundred and twenty-six, 1666, 41 and 38 lesions were treated with L + BE, L + PYG, L + ethanol and PVA, respectively. Median follow-up time after embolization was 12 months. Lipiodol-based treatments showed significant effect in reducing hemangioma size after TAE compared to PVA (P < 0.001). Pooled diameter reduction (cm) (95% confidence interval) was - 4.37( - 5.32, - 3.42), - 4.70( - 5.70, - 3.71), - 0.93( - 2.02, 0.16) for overall TAE treatment, Lipiodol-based and non-Lipiodol-based treatments, respectively. Main complications included post-embolization syndrome and transient liver enzyme elevation (pooled incidence for Lipiodol-based and non-Lipiodol-based techniques: 36% and 33%; and 37% and 0, respectively). No fatal complications were reported. Symptomatic improvement was reported in 63.3%-100% of the cases with majority of studies (15/21) reporting improvement in all cases (pooled response rate: 98%).

CONCLUSIONS

Transarterial embolization with bleomycin, pingyangmycin or ethanol in combination with Lipiodol is safe and associated with reduced size of hemangiomas resulting in symptoms alleviation.

Giant Liver Hemangiomas: A Plea for Early Surgical Referral and Resection

Hepatic hemangiomas are the most common benign hepatic tumor. Current guidelines recommend surveillance imaging and reserving surgical intervention for symptomatic patients with giant liver hemangiomas (>5 cm). We present the case of a patient with a rapidly enlarging giant hepatic hemangioma initially managed by surveillance. During her observation period, she developed weight loss, constipation, and pancytopenia concerning for Kasabach-Merritt Syndrome. Resection of the hemangioma was complicated by its large size (28.0×18.0×11.4 cm). Patients with rapidly growing giant liver hemangiomas, even when asymptomatic, should be promptly referred to specialized surgical centers for evaluation and management.

Surgical indication and strategy for liver hemangioma in the caudate lobe: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis with 137 patients

Objective

To investigate the surgical indication and tactics for liver hemangioma in the caudate lobe

Methods

From January 1994 to July 2019, 137 patients, including 51 males and 86 females with the average age of 49.2 years old were diagnosed with liver hemangioma in caudate lobe and received treatment at five tertiary referral hospitals. Clinical features, correlations between tumor size and clinical manifestations, treatments, and prognosis were analyzed.

Results

Of the 137 patients identified, 40 (29.20%) patients were asymptomatic, whereas other 94 patients had clinical symptoms mainly presented as upper abdominal discomfort, epigastric distention, upper abdominal dull pain, nausea, and vomiting. Fifteen (93.75%), 18 (39.13%), and 7 (10.45%) patients presented no clinical symptoms among those tumor size was less than 3 cm (D ≤ 3 cm, n = 16), 3 cm < D ≤ 6 cm (n = 46), and 6 cm < D ≤ 9 cm (n = 67), respectively, while all 8 patients with tumor larger than 9 cm were symptomatic. Tumor diameter was obviously associated with the presence of clinical symptoms. In follow-up period, 7 patients in the conservative group (n = 39) received surgery because of tumor growth or symptom appearance. Totally 105 patients received operation including partial resection or isolated complete resection of caudate lobe and caudate lobe resection combined with liver segment resection, right liver resection, or left liver resection. All operations went smoothly, and no severe complications appeared.

Conclusion

Tumor diameter was obviously associated with the presence of clinical symptoms in patients with hemangioma in caudate lobe. Surgical therapy is not recommended for asymptomatic patients and available for patient who has symptoms. Effective surgical strategies should be put into use to reduce operative bleeding.

Invasive management of symptomatic hepatic hemangioma

Hepatic hemangioma is common among benign liver tumors and usually grows slowly. About 50-70% of hepatic hemangiomas are asymptomatic, and management is not necessary; however, management should be considered in symptomatic patients. The optimal management of symptomatic hepatic hemangioma depends on multiple factors. Invasive management of symptomatic hepatic hemangioma mainly consists of surgery and interventional radiology, including transarterial embolization, ablation, percutaneous sclerotherapy, and percutaneous argon-helium cryotherapy. Although both surgery and interventional radiology are promising in the management of symptomatic hepatic hemangioma, multiple and/or giant hemangiomas represent a clinical dilemma because the complication rate and recurrence rate are relatively high, and symptom relief is not always achieved. However, a review of recent advances in treatment is lacking. We therefore summarized the current invasive management techniques for symptomatic hepatic hemangioma to potentially facilitate clinical decision-making.