1
|
Habib JR, Kinny-Köster B, Javed AA, Zelga P, Saadat LV, Kim RC, Gorris M, Allegrini V, Watanabe S, Sharib J, Arcerito M, Kaiser J, Lafaro KJ, Tu M, Bhandre M, Shi C, Kim MP, Correa C, Daamen LA, Oberstein PE, Schmidt CM, Hanna NN, Allen P, Loos M, Shrikhande SV, Molenaar IQ, Frigerio I, Katz MHG, Soares KC, Miao Y, Del Chiaro M, He J, Hackert T, Salvia R, Büchler MW, Castillo CFD, Besselink MG, Marchegiani G, Wolfgang CL. Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Resected Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm-Derived Pancreatic Cancer: Results From an International Multicenter Study. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:4317-4326. [PMID: 39255450 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The benefit of adjuvant therapy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear because of severely limited evidence. Although biologically distinct entities, adjuvant therapy practices for IPMN-derived PDAC are largely founded on pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia-derived PDAC. We aimed to evaluate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in IPMN-derived PDAC. METHODS This international multicenter retrospective cohort study (2005-2018) was conceived at the Verona Evidence-Based Medicine meeting. Cox regressions were performed to identify risk-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) associated with overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were employed for survival analysis. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors motivating adjuvant chemotherapy administration. A decision tree was proposed and categorized patients into overtreated, undertreated, and optimally treated cohorts. RESULTS In 1,031 patients from 16 centers, nodal disease (HR, 2.88, P < .001) and elevated (≥37 to <200 µ/mL, HR, 1.44, P = .006) or markedly elevated (≥200 µ/mL, HR, 2.53, P < .001) carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) were associated with worse OS. Node-positive patients with elevated CA19-9 had an associated 34.4-month improvement in median OS (P = .047) after adjuvant chemotherapy while those with positive nodes and markedly elevated CA19-9 had an associated 12.6-month survival benefit (P < .001). Node-negative patients, regardless of CA19-9, did not have an associated benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (all P > .05). Based on this model, we observed undertreatment in 18.1% and overtreatment in 61.2% of patients. Factors associated with chemotherapy administration included younger age, R1-margin, poorer differentiation, and nodal disease. CONCLUSION Almost half of patients with resected IPMN-derived PDAC may be overtreated or undertreated. In patients with node-negative disease or normal CA19-9, adjuvant chemotherapy is not associated with a survival benefit, whereas those with node-positive disease and elevated CA19-9 have an associated benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. A decision tree was proposed. Randomized controlled trials are needed for validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph R Habib
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | - Ammar A Javed
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | - Lily V Saadat
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Rachel C Kim
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Myrte Gorris
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Shuichi Watanabe
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | | | | | - Jörg Kaiser
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kelly J Lafaro
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Min Tu
- The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | | | | | - Michael P Kim
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Camilo Correa
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Lois A Daamen
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - C Max Schmidt
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Nader N Hanna
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Martin Loos
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Yi Miao
- The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Marco Del Chiaro
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Jin He
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Thilo Hackert
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Habib JR, Javed AA, Rompen IF, Hidalgo Salinas C, Sorrentino A, Campbell BA, Andel PCM, Groot VP, Lafaro KJ, Sacks GD, Billeter AT, Molenaar IQ, Müller-Stich BP, Besselink MG, He J, Wolfgang CL, Daamen LA. Defining and Predicting Early Recurrence for Optimal Treatment Strategies for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm-Derived Pancreatic Cancer: An International Multicenter Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-16649-z. [PMID: 39666193 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16649-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2024] [Accepted: 11/21/2024] [Indexed: 12/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early recurrence in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is poorly defined. Predictors are lacking and needed for patient counseling, risk stratification, and postoperative management. This study aimed to define and predict early recurrence for patients in resected IPMN-derived PDAC and guide management. METHODS A lowest p value for survival after recurrence (SAR) was used to define early recurrence in resected IPMN-derived PDAC from five international centers. Overall survival (OS) and SAR were compared using log-rank tests. A multivariable logistic regression identified odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for early recurrence. Rounded ORs were used to stratify patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups using upper and lower quartile score distributions. Adjuvant chemotherapy was assessed by Cox regression and log-rank tests for OS in risk groups. RESULTS Recurrence developed in 160 (42 %) of 381 patients. Early recurrence was defined at 10.5 months and observed in 61 patients (38 % of recurrences). The median SAR for the patients with early recurrence was 8.3 months (95 % CI, 3.1-16.1 months) compared with 12.9 months (95 % CI, 5.2-27.5 months) for the patients with late recurrence. The independent predictors of early recurrence were CA19-9 (OR, 3.80; 95 % CI, 1.54-9.41) and N2 disease (OR, 7.29; 95 % CI, 3.22-16.49). The early recurrence rates in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were respectively 1 %, 14 %, and 32 %. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS only for the high-risk patients (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95 % CI, 0.32-0.79). CONCLUSION In IPMN-derived PDAC, the optimal cutoff for early recurrence is 10.5 months. Both CA19-9 and N stage predict early recurrence. Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with survival benefit only for high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph R Habib
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ingmar F Rompen
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anthony Sorrentino
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brady A Campbell
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Paul C M Andel
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent P Groot
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kelly J Lafaro
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Greg D Sacks
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adrian T Billeter
- University of Basel, Clarunis University Digestive Health Care Center, Basel, Switzerland
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- University of Basel, Clarunis University Digestive Health Care Center, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Lois A Daamen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Habib JR, Rompen IF, Javed AA, Sorrentino AM, Riachi ME, Cao W, Besselink MG, Molenaar IQ, He J, Wolfgang CL, Daamen LA. Evaluation of AJCC Nodal Staging for Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm-Derived Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:8712-8720. [PMID: 39283575 PMCID: PMC11549140 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16055-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 08/04/2024] [Indexed: 11/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) eighth edition is based on pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), a biologically distinct entity from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-derived pancreatic cancer. The role of nodal disease and the AJCC's prognostic utility for IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of nodal disease and the AJCC eighth-edition N-staging for IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer. METHODS Upfront-surgery patients with IPMN-derived PDAC from four centers were stratified according to the AJCC eighth-edition N stage. Disease characteristics were compared using descriptive statistics, and both overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated using log-rank tests. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to determine the prognostic value of N stage for OS, presented as hazard ratios with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs). A lowest p value log-rank statistic was used to derive the optimal cutoff for node-positive disease. RESULTS For 360 patients, advanced N stage was associated with worse T stage, grade, tubular histology, and perineural and lymphovascular invasion (all p < 0.05). The median OS was 98.3 months (95 % CI 82.8-122.0 months) for N0 disease, 27.8 months (95 % CI 24.4-41.7 months) for N1 disease, and 18.1 months (95 % CI 16.2-25.9 months) for N2 disease (p < 0.001). The AJCC N stage was validated and associated with worse OS (N1 [HR 1.64; range, 1.05-2.57], N2 [HR2.42; range, 1.48-3.96]) and RFS (N1 [HR 1.81; range, 1.23-2.68], N2 [HR 3.72; range, 2.40-5.77]). The optimal cutoff for positive nodes was five nodes. CONCLUSION The AJCC eighth-edition N-staging is valid and prognostic for both OS and RFS in IPMN-derived PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph R Habib
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ingmar F Rompen
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Mansour E Riachi
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wenqing Cao
- Department of Pathology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Lois A Daamen
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Habib JR, Rompen IF, Javed AA, Grewal M, Kinny‐Köster B, Andel PC, Hewitt DB, Sacks GD, Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Daamen LA, Loos M, He J, Büchler MW, Wolfgang CL, Molenaar IQ. Outcomes in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm-derived pancreatic cancer differ from PanIN-derived pancreatic cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 39:2360-2366. [PMID: 39086101 PMCID: PMC11618288 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Revised: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/13/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) management is generally extrapolated from pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN)-derived PDAC guidelines. However, these are biologically divergent, and heterogeneity further exists between tubular and colloid subtypes. METHODS Consecutive upfront surgery patients with PanIN-derived and IPMN-derived PDAC were retrospectively identified from international centers (2000-2019). One-to-one propensity score matching for clinicopathologic factors generated three cohorts: IPMN-derived versus PanIN-derived PDAC, tubular IPMN-derived versus PanIN-derived PDAC, and tubular versus colloid IPMN-derived PDAC. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Multivariable Cox regression determined corresponding hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS The median OS (mOS) in 2350 PanIN-derived and 700 IPMN-derived PDAC patients was 23.0 and 43.1 months (P < 0.001), respectively. PanIN-derived PDAC had worse T-stage, CA19-9, grade, and nodal status. Tubular subtype had worse T-stage, CA19-9, grade, nodal status, and R1 margins, with a mOS of 33.7 versus 94.1 months (P < 0.001) in colloid. Matched (n = 495), PanIN-derived and IPMN-derived PDAC had mOSs of 30.6 and 42.8 months (P < 0.001), respectively. In matched (n = 341) PanIN-derived and tubular IPMN-derived PDAC, mOS remained poorer (27.7 vs 37.4, P < 0.001). Matched tubular and colloid cancers (n = 112) had similar OS (P = 0.55). On multivariable Cox regression, PanIN-derived PDAC was associated with worse OS than IPMN-derived (HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.44-1.90) and tubular IPMN-derived (HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.32-1.77) PDAC. Colloid and tubular subtype was not associated with OS (P = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS PanIN-derived PDAC has worse survival than IPMN-derived PDAC supporting distinct outcomes. Although more indolent, colloid IPMN-derived PDAC has similar survival to tubular after risk adjustment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph R. Habib
- Department of SurgeryNew York University Langone HealthNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Department of SurgeryRegional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital NieuwegeinUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Ingmar F. Rompen
- Department of SurgeryNew York University Langone HealthNew YorkNew YorkUSA
- Heidelberg University HospitalHeidelbergGermany
| | - Ammar A. Javed
- Department of SurgeryNew York University Langone HealthNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Mahip Grewal
- Department of SurgeryNew York University Langone HealthNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Paul C.M. Andel
- Department of SurgeryRegional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital NieuwegeinUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - D. Brock Hewitt
- Department of SurgeryNew York University Langone HealthNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Greg D. Sacks
- Department of SurgeryNew York University Langone HealthNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Department of SurgeryAmsterdam UMC, location University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Cancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
- Department of SurgeryRegional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital NieuwegeinUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Lois A. Daamen
- Department of SurgeryRegional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital NieuwegeinUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Division of Imaging and OncologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Martin Loos
- Heidelberg University HospitalHeidelbergGermany
| | - Jin He
- Department of SurgeryJohns Hopkins HospitalBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | | | | | - I. Quintus Molenaar
- Department of SurgeryRegional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital NieuwegeinUtrechtThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Habib JR, Rompen IF, Campbell BA, Andel PCM, Kinny-Köster B, Damaseviciute R, Brock Hewitt D, Sacks GD, Javed AA, Besselink MG, van Santvoort HC, Daamen LA, Loos M, He J, Quintus Molenaar I, Büchler MW, Wolfgang CL. An international multi-institutional validation of T1 sub-staging of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm-derived pancreatic cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:1791-1797. [PMID: 39029923 PMCID: PMC11542988 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is resected at smaller sizes compared with its biologically distinct counterpart, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN)-derived PDAC. Thus, experts proposed T1 sub-staging for IPMN-derived PDAC. However, this has never been validated. METHODS Consecutive upfront surgery patients with IPMN-derived PDAC from 5 international high-volume centers were classified by the proposed T1 sub-staging classification (T1a ≤0.5, T1b >0.5 and ≤1.0, and T1c >1.0 and ≤2.0 cm) using the invasive component size. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to compare overall survival (OS). A multivariable Cox regression was used to determine hazard ratios (HRs) with confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS Among 747 patients, 69 (9.2%), 50 (6.7%), 99 (13.0%), and 531 patients (71.1%), comprised the T1a, T1b, T1c, and T2-4 subgroups, respectively. Increasing T-stage was associated with elevated CA19-9, poorer grade, nodal positivity, R1 margin, and tubular subtype. Median OS for T1a, T1b, T1c, and T2-4 were 159.0 (95% CI = 126.0 to NR), 128.8 (98.3 to NR), 77.6 (48.3 to 108.2), and 31.4 (27.5 to 37.7) months, respectively (P < .001). OS decreased with increasing T-stage for all pairwise comparisons (all P < .05). After risk adjustment, older than age 65, elevated CA19-9, T1b [HR = 2.55 (1.22 to 5.32)], T1c [HR = 3.04 (1.60 to 5.76)], and T2-4 [HR = 3.41 (1.89 to 6.17)] compared with T1a, nodal positivity, R1 margin, and no adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with worse OS. Disease recurrence was more common in T2-4 tumors (56.4%) compared with T1a (18.2%), T1b (23.9%), and T1c (36.1%, P < .001). CONCLUSION T1 sub-staging of IPMN-derived PDAC is valid and has significant prognostic value. Advancing T1 sub-stage is associated with worse histopathology, survival, and recurrence. T1 sub-staging is recommended for future guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph R Habib
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ingmar F Rompen
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Brady A Campbell
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Paul C M Andel
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Benedict Kinny-Köster
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ryte Damaseviciute
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - D Brock Hewitt
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Greg D Sacks
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ammar A Javed
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lois A Daamen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Loos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - I Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of Surgery, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Oppat KM, Bennett FJ, Maithel SK. A Review of the Indications, Outcomes, and Postoperative Management After Total and Completion Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: More Is Not Necessarily Better. Surg Clin North Am 2024; 104:1049-1064. [PMID: 39237163 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2024.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2024]
Abstract
With improvements in surgical technique and advances in pancreatic endocrine and exocrine replacement therapy, the indications for, and threshold to perform, total or completion pancreatectomy in the modern surgical era are ever evolving. The following review will evaluate such indications for pancreatic cancer including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. The authors also review the literature on oncologic outcomes of total and completion pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Finally, they discuss the quality of life and postoperative management of the a-pancreatic state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kailey M Oppat
- Emory University, 1365B Clifton Road, NE Building B, Suite 4100, Office 4202, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA
| | - Frances J Bennett
- Emory University, 1365B Clifton Road, NE Building B, Suite 4100, Office 4202, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Emory University, 1365B Clifton Road, NE Building B, Suite 4100, Office 4202, Atlanta, GA 30302, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hirono S, Higuchi R, Honda G, Nara S, Esaki M, Gotohda N, Takami H, Unno M, Sugiura T, Ohtsuka M, Shimizu Y, Matsumoto I, Kin T, Isayama H, Hashimoto D, Seyama Y, Nagano H, Hakamada K, Hirano S, Nagakawa Y, Mizuno S, Takahashi H, Shibuya K, Sasanuma H, Aoki T, Kohara Y, Rikiyama T, Nakamura M, Endo I, Sakamoto Y, Horiguchi A, Hatori T, Akita H, Ueki T, Idichi T, Hanada K, Suzuki S, Okano K, Maehira H, Motoi F, Fujino Y, Tanno S, Yanagisawa A, Takeyama Y, Okazaki K, Satoi S, Yamaue H. Is multidisciplinary treatment effective for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma? Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2024; 8:845-859. [PMID: 39229554 PMCID: PMC11368504 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Surgical resection is standard treatment for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous carcinoma (IPMC); however, impact of multidisciplinary treatment on survival including postoperative adjuvant therapy (AT), neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), and treatment for recurrent lesions is unclear. We investigated the effectiveness of multidisciplinary treatment in prolonging survival of patients with invasive IPMC. Methods This retrospective multi-institutional study included 1183 patients with invasive IPMC undergoing surgery at 40 academic institutions. We analyzed the effects of AT, NAT, and treatment for recurrence on survival of patients with invasive IPMC. Results Completion of the planned postoperative AT for 6 months improved the overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with stage IIB and stage III resected invasive IPMC, elevated preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, serosal invasion, and lymph node metastasis on un-matched and matched analyses. Of the patients with borderline resectable (BR) invasive IPMC, the OS (p = 0.001), DSS (p = 0.001), and RFS (p = 0.001) of patients undergoing NAT was longer than that of those without on the matched analysis. Of the 484 invasive IPMC patients (40.9%) who developed recurrence after surgery, the OS of 365 patients who received any treatment for recurrence was longer than that of those without treatment (40.6 vs. 22.4 months, p < 0.001). Conclusion Postoperative AT might benefit selected patients with invasive IPMC, especially those at high risk of poor survival. NAT might improve the survivability of BR invasive IPMC. Any treatment for recurrence after surgery for invasive IPMC might improve survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiko Hirono
- Second Department of SurgeryWakayama Medical University, School of MedicineWakayamaJapan
- Division of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryHyogo Medical UniversityNishinomiyaJapan
| | - Ryota Higuchi
- Department of Surgery, Institute of GastroenterologyTokyo Women's Medical UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Goro Honda
- Department of Surgery, Institute of GastroenterologyTokyo Women's Medical UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Satoshi Nara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic SurgeryNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Minoru Esaki
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic SurgeryNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Naoto Gotohda
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic SurgeryNational Cancer Center Hospital EastKashiwaJapan
| | - Hideki Takami
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryNagoya University Graduate School of MedicineNagoyaJapan
| | - Michiaki Unno
- Department of SurgeryTohoku University Graduate School of MedicineSendaiJapan
| | - Teiichi Sugiura
- Division of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryShizuoka Cancer CenterShizuokaJapan
| | - Masayuki Ohtsuka
- Department of General SurgeryChiba University, Graduate School of MedicineChibaJapan
| | - Yasuhiro Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryAichi Cancer Center HospitalNagoyaJapan
| | - Ippei Matsumoto
- Division of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery, Department of SurgeryKindai University Faculty of MedicineOsakasayamaJapan
| | | | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of MedicineJuntendo UniversityTokyoJapan
| | | | - Yasuji Seyama
- Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryTokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroaki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological Breast and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate MedicineUbeJapan
| | - Kenichi Hakamada
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryHirosaki University Graduate School of MedicineHirosakiJapan
| | - Satoshi Hirano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery IIHokkaido University Faculty of MedicineSapporoJapan
| | - Yuichi Nagakawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric SurgeryTokyo Medical UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Shugo Mizuno
- Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic & Transplant SurgeryMie UniversityTsuJapan
| | - Hidenori Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of MedicineOsaka UniversitySuitaJapan
| | - Kazuto Shibuya
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic AssemblyUniversity of ToyamaToyamaJapan
| | - Hideki Sasanuma
- Department of SurgeryJichi Medical UniversityShimotsukeJapan
| | - Taku Aoki
- Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryDokkyo Medical UniversityMibuJapan
| | | | - Toshiki Rikiyama
- Department of Surgery, Saitama Medical CenterJichi Medical UniversitySaitamaJapan
| | - Masafumi Nakamura
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryYokohama City University School of MedicineYokohamaJapan
| | - Yoshihiro Sakamoto
- Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryKyorin University HospitalMitakaJapan
| | - Akihiko Horiguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryFujita Health University School of Medicine, Bantane HospitalNagoyaJapan
| | - Takashi Hatori
- Digestive Disease Center, International University of Health and WelfareMita HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Hirofumi Akita
- Osaka International Cancer InstituteDepartment of Gasteroenterological SugeryOsakaJapan
| | - Toshiharu Ueki
- Department of GastroenterologyFukuoka University Chikushi HospitalFukuokaJapan
| | - Tetsuya Idichi
- Department of Digestive SurgeryKagoshima UniversityKagoshimaJapan
| | - Keiji Hanada
- Department of GastroenterologyOnomichi General HospitalOnomichiJapan
| | - Shuji Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Ibaraki Medical CenterTokyo Medical UniversityIneshikiJapan
| | - Keiichi Okano
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryKagawa UniversityKidaJapan
| | | | | | - Yasuhiro Fujino
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryHyogo Cancer CenterAkashiJapan
| | - Satoshi Tanno
- Department of GastroenterologyIMS Sapporo Digestive Disease Central General HospitalSapporoJapan
| | - Akio Yanagisawa
- Department of PathologyJapanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi HospitalKamigyo‐kuJapan
| | - Yoshifumi Takeyama
- Division of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery, Department of SurgeryKindai University Faculty of MedicineOsakasayamaJapan
| | | | - Sohei Satoi
- Department of SurgeryKansai Medical UniversityHirakataJapan
| | - Hiroki Yamaue
- Second Department of SurgeryWakayama Medical University, School of MedicineWakayamaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lucocq J, Joseph N, Hawkyard J, Haugk B, White S, Lye J, Parkinson D, Mownah O, Menon K, Furukawa T, Hirose Y, Sasahira N, Inoue Y, Mittal A, Samra J, Sheen A, Feretis M, Balakrishnan A, Ceresa C, Davidson B, Pande R, Dasari B, Roberts K, Tanno L, Karavias D, Helliwell J, Young A, Marks K, Nunes Q, Urbonas T, Silva M, Gordon-Weeks A, Barrie J, Gomez D, van Laarhoven S, Nawara H, Doyle J, Bhogal R, Harrison E, Roalso M, Ciprani D, Aroori S, Ratnayake B, Koea J, Capurso G, Stättner S, Bellotti R, Alsaoudi T, Bhardwaj N, Rajesh S, Jeffery F, Connor S, Cameron A, Jamieson N, Gill A, Soreide K, Pandanaboyana S. Predictors of long-term survival after resection of adenocarcinoma arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and derivation of a prognostic model: An international multicenter study (ADENO-IPMN study). Surgery 2024; 176:890-898. [PMID: 38918108 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Predictors of long-term survival after resection of adenocarcinoma arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms are unknown. This study determines predictors of long-term (>5 years) disease-free survival and recurrence in adenocarcinoma arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and derives a prognostic model for disease-free survival. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms in 18 academic pancreatic centers in Europe and Asia between 2010 to 2017 with at least 5-year follow-up were identified. Factors associated with disease-free survival were determined using Cox proportional hazards model. Internal validation was performed, and discrimination and calibration indices were assessed. RESULTS In the study, 288 patients (median age, 70 years; 52% male) were identified; 140 (48%) patients developed recurrence after a median follow-up of 98 months (interquartile range, 78.4-123), 57 patients (19.8%) developed locoregional recurrence, and 109 patients (37.8%) systemic recurrence. At 5 years after resection, the overall and disease-free survival was 46.5% (134/288) and 35.0% (101/288), respectively. On Cox proportional hazards model analysis, multivisceral resection (hazard ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-4.60), pancreatic tail location (hazard ratio, 2.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-4.50), poor tumor differentiation (hazard ratio, 2.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-5.30), lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.88), and perineural invasion (hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.10) were negatively associated with long-term disease-free survival. The final predictive model incorporated 8 predictors and demonstrated good predictive ability for disease-free survival (C-index, 0.74; calibration, slope 1.00). CONCLUSION A third of patients achieve long-term disease-free survival (>5 years) after pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. The predictive model developed in the current study can be used to estimate the probability of long-term disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nejo Joseph
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jake Hawkyard
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Beate Haugk
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Steve White
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jonathan Lye
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Daniel Parkinson
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Omar Mownah
- Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Krishna Menon
- Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Takaki Furukawa
- Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine Department, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Hirose
- Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine Department, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Sasahira
- Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine Department, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Inoue
- Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine Department, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Jas Samra
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Amy Sheen
- New South Wales Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Feretis
- Cambridge Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anita Balakrishnan
- Cambridge Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carlo Ceresa
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, The Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Brian Davidson
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, The Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | - Rupaly Pande
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK
| | - Bobby Dasari
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK
| | - Keith Roberts
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK
| | - Lulu Tanno
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Dimitrios Karavias
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Jack Helliwell
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Alistair Young
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Kate Marks
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Quentin Nunes
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, East Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - Tomas Urbonas
- Oxford Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgical Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Michael Silva
- Oxford Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgical Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Alex Gordon-Weeks
- Oxford Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgical Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Jenifer Barrie
- Nottingham Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary (HPB) Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Dhanny Gomez
- Nottingham Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary (HPB) Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Stijn van Laarhoven
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol & Weston NHS Foundation trust, UK
| | - Hossam Nawara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol & Weston NHS Foundation trust, UK
| | - Joseph Doyle
- Gastrointestinal Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ricky Bhogal
- Gastrointestinal Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ewen Harrison
- Department of Clinical Surgery, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Marcus Roalso
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Norway
| | - Debora Ciprani
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Somaiah Aroori
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Bathiya Ratnayake
- Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary/Upper Gastrointestinal Unit, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, NZ
| | - Jonathan Koea
- Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary/Upper Gastrointestinal Unit, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, NZ
| | - Gabriele Capurso
- Digestive and Disease Unit, S. Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy; Pancreas Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefan Stättner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ruben Bellotti
- Leicester Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK
| | - Tareq Alsaoudi
- Leicester Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK
| | - Neil Bhardwaj
- Leicester Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK
| | - Srujan Rajesh
- Leicester Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK
| | - Fraser Jeffery
- Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Canterbury District Health Board, NZ
| | - Saxon Connor
- Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Canterbury District Health Board, NZ
| | - Andrew Cameron
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Center, Research Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Nigel Jamieson
- Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Center, Research Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Anthony Gill
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; New South Wales Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kjetil Soreide
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Norway
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
de Jesus VHF, Donadio MDS, de Brito ÂBC, Gentilli AC. A narrative review on rare types of pancreatic cancer: should they be treated as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas? Ther Adv Med Oncol 2024; 16:17588359241265213. [PMID: 39072242 PMCID: PMC11282540 DOI: 10.1177/17588359241265213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest malignancies in humans and it is expected to play a bigger part in cancer burden in the years to come. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents 85% of all primary pancreatic malignancies. Recently, much attention has been given to PDAC, with significant advances in the understanding of the mechanisms underpinning disease initiation and progression, along with noticeable improvements in overall survival in both localized and metastatic settings. However, given their rarity, rare histological subtypes of pancreatic cancer have been underappreciated and are frequently treated as PDAC, even though they might present non-overlapping molecular alterations and clinical behavior. While some of these rare histological subtypes are true variants of PDAC that should be treated likewise, others represent separate clinicopathological entities, warranting a different therapeutic approach. In this review, we highlight clinical, pathological, and molecular aspects of rare histological types of pancreatic cancer, along with the currently available data to guide treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Hugo Fonseca de Jesus
- Oncoclínicas, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Santos Dumont St. 182, 4 floor, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina 88015-020, Brazil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro de Pesquisas Oncológicas, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Beger HG, Mayer B, Poch B. Long-Term Oncologic Outcome following Duodenum-Preserving Pancreatic Head Resection for Benign Tumors, Cystic Neoplasms, and Neuroendocrine Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:4637-4653. [PMID: 38578553 PMCID: PMC11164799 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15222-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) has a considerable surgical risk for complications and late metabolic morbidity. Parenchyma-sparing resection of benign tumors has the potential to cure patients associated with reduced procedure-related short- and long-term complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries were searched for studies reporting surgery-related complications following PD and duodenum-preserving total (DPPHRt) or partial (DPPHRp) pancreatic head resection for benign tumors. A total of 38 cohort studies that included data from 1262 patients were analyzed. In total, 729 patients underwent DPPHR and 533 PD. RESULTS Concordance between preoperative diagnosis of benign tumors and final histopathology was 90.57% for DPPHR. Cystic and neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNETs) and periampullary tumors (PATs) were observed in 497, 89, and 31 patients, respectively. In total, 34 of 161 (21.1%) patients with intraepithelial papillar mucinous neoplasm exhibited severe dysplasia in the final histopathology. The meta-analysis, when comparing DPPHRt and PD, revealed in-hospital mortality of 1/362 (0.26%) and 8/547 (1.46%) patients, respectively [OR 0.48 (95% CI 0.15-1.58); p = 0.21], and frequency of reoperation of 3.26 % and 6.75%, respectively [OR 0.52 (95% CI 0.28-0.96); p = 0.04]. After a follow-up of 45.8 ± 26.6 months, 14/340 patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms/mucinous cystic neoplasms (IPMN/MCN, 4.11%) and 2/89 patients with PNET (2.24%) exhibited tumor recurrence. Local recurrence at the resection margin and reoccurrence of tumor growth in the remnant pancreas was comparable after DPPHR or PD [OR 0.94 (95% CI 0.178-5.34); p = 0.96]. CONCLUSIONS DPPHR for benign, premalignant neoplasms provides a cure for patients with low risk of tumor recurrence and significantly fewer early surgery-related complications compared with PD. DPPHR has the potential to replace PD for benign, premalignant cystic and neuroendocrine neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans G Beger
- c/o University Hospital Ulm, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
| | - Benjamin Mayer
- Institute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Bertram Poch
- Centre for Oncologic, Endocrine and Minimal Invasive Surgery, Donau-Klinikum Neu-Ulm, Neu-Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Balaban DV, Coman LI, Balaban M, Costache RS, Jinga M. Novel Insights into Postoperative Surveillance in Resected Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms-A Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1056. [PMID: 38786354 PMCID: PMC11119521 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14101056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Revised: 05/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) are frequently encountered in clinical practice and some are referred to surgery due to their neoplastic risk or malignant transformation. The management of PCL involves complex decision-making, with postoperative surveillance being a key component for long-term outcomes, due to the potential for recurrence and postoperative morbidity. Unfortunately, the follow-up of resected patients is far from being optimal and there is a lack of consensus on recommendations with regard to timing and methods of surveillance. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on the postoperative surveillance of neoplastic pancreatic cysts, focusing on the mechanisms and risk factors for recurrence, the recurrence rates according to the initial indication for surgery, the final result of the surgical specimen and neoplastic risk in the remaining pancreas, as well as the postsurgical morbidity comprising pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, metabolic dysfunction and diabetes after resection, according to the type of surgery performed. We analyze postsurgical recurrence rates and morbidity profiles, as influenced by different surgical techniques, to better delineate at-risk patients, and highlight the need for tailored surveillance strategies adapted to preoperative and operative factors with an impact on outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Vasile Balaban
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (L.-I.C.); (R.S.C.); (M.J.)
- Gastroenterology Department, Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Laura-Ioana Coman
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (L.-I.C.); (R.S.C.); (M.J.)
- Gastroenterology Department, Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Marina Balaban
- Doctoral School, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Raluca Simona Costache
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (L.-I.C.); (R.S.C.); (M.J.)
- Gastroenterology Department, Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Mariana Jinga
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (L.-I.C.); (R.S.C.); (M.J.)
- Gastroenterology Department, Central Military Emergency University Hospital, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hamada T, Oyama H, Igarashi A, Kawaguchi Y, Lee M, Matsui H, Michihata N, Nakai Y, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H, Fujishiro M. Optimal age to discontinue long-term surveillance of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: comparative cost-effectiveness of surveillance by age. Gut 2024; 73:955-965. [PMID: 38286589 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Current guidelines recommend long-term image-based surveillance for patients with low-risk intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). This simulation study aimed to examine the comparative cost-effectiveness of continued versus discontinued surveillance at different ages and define the optimal age to stop surveillance. DESIGN We constructed a Markov model with a lifetime horizon to simulate the clinical course of patients with IPMNs receiving imaging-based surveillance. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for continued versus discontinued surveillance at different ages to stop surveillance, stratified by sex and IPMN types (branch-duct vs mixed-type). We determined the optimal age to stop surveillance as the lowest age at which the ICER exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$100 000 per quality-adjusted life year. To estimate model parameters, we used a clinical cohort of 3000 patients with IPMNs and a national database including 40 166 patients with pancreatic cancer receiving pancreatectomy as well as published data. RESULTS In male patients, the optimal age to stop surveillance was 76-78 years irrespective of the IPMN types, compared with 70, 73, 81, and 84 years for female patients with branch-duct IPMNs <20 mm, =20-29 mm, ≥30 mm and mixed-type IPMNs, respectively. The suggested ages became younger according to an increasing level of comorbidities. In cases with high comorbidity burden, the ICERs were above the willingness-to-pay threshold irrespective of sex and the size of branch-duct IPMNs. CONCLUSIONS The cost-effectiveness of long-term IPMN surveillance depended on sex, IPMN types, and comorbidity levels, suggesting the potential to personalise patient management from the health economic perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
- Graduate School of Public Health, St Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Oyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ataru Igarashi
- Graduate School of Public Health, St Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan
- Unit of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
- Department of Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
- Graduate School of Public Health, St Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mihye Lee
- Graduate School of Public Health, St Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Matsui
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Michihata
- Department of Health Services Research, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fushimi
- Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideo Yasunaga
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pavlidis ET, Galanis IN, Pavlidis TE. Current considerations on intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct and pancreatic duct. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:1461-1465. [PMID: 38596486 PMCID: PMC11000088 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i10.1461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatobiliary intraductal papillary neoplasms (IPNs) represent precursors of pancreatic cancer or bile duct cholangiocarcinoma that can be detected and treated. Despite advances in diagnostic methods, identifying these premalignant lesions is still challenging for treatment providers. Modern imaging, biomarkers and molecular tests for genomic alterations can be used for diagnosis and follow-up. Surgical intervention in combination with new chemotherapeutic agents is considered the optimal treatment for malignant cases. The balance between the risk of malignancy and any risk of resection guides management policy; therefore, treatment should be individualized based on a meticulous preoperative assessment of high-risk stigmata. IPN of the bile duct is more aggressive; thus, early diagnosis and surgery are crucial. The conservative management of low-risk pancreatic branch-duct lesions is safe and effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efstathios T Pavlidis
- 2nd Propedeutic Department of Surgery, Hippokration General Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
| | - Ioannis N Galanis
- 2nd Propedeutic Department of Surgery, Hippokration General Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
| | - Theodoros E Pavlidis
- 2nd Propedeutic Department of Surgery, Hippokration General Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Grewal M, Habib JR, Paluszek O, Cohen SM, Wolfgang CL, Javed AA. The Role of Intraoperative Pancreatoscopy in the Surgical Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: A Scoping Review. Pancreas 2024; 53:e280-e287. [PMID: 38277399 DOI: 10.1097/mpa.0000000000002294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Most patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are diagnosed with a solitary lesion; however, the presence of skip lesions, not appreciable on imaging, has been described. Postoperatively, these missed lesions can continue to grow and potentially become cancerous. Intraoperative pancreatoscopy (IOP) may facilitate detection of such skip lesions in the remnant gland. The aim of this scoping review was to appraise the evidence on the role of IOP in the surgical management of IPMNs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Studies reporting on the use of IOP during IPMN surgery were identified through searches of the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Data extracted included IOP findings, surgical plan modifications, and patient outcomes. The primary outcome of interest was the utility of IOP in surgical decision making. RESULTS Ten studies reporting on the use of IOP for IPMNs were identified, representing 147 patients. A total of 46 skip lesions were identified by IOP. Overall, surgical plans were altered in 37% of patients who underwent IOP. No IOP-related complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS The current literature suggests a potential role of integration of IOP into the management of patients with IPMNs. This tool is safe and feasible and can result in changes in surgical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahip Grewal
- From the Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Joseph R Habib
- From the Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | - Steven M Cohen
- From the Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Christopher L Wolfgang
- From the Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Ammar A Javed
- From the Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|