Predictors of Pharmacotherapy for Tobacco Use Among Veterans Admitted for COPD: The Role of Disparities and Tobacco Control Processes

Obstructive respiratory disease in U.S. veterans: Prevalence, characteristics, and health burden

OBJECTIVE

To examine the psychiatric and physical health burden of obstructive respiratory disease in a nationally representative sample of U.S. Veterans.

METHODS

Secondary data analyses were conducted using data from the 2019-2020 National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study, which surveyed a nationally representative sample of U.S. Veterans. Participants self-reported health professional-diagnosed obstructive respiratory disease (i.e., asthma, chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Veterans who reported obstructive respiratory disease (n = 502) were compared to veterans without this disease but with at least one or more other medical conditions-controls (n = 3169) on measures of sociodemographic, trauma, psychiatric, and physical health characteristics. Multivariable regression analyses examined independent associations between obstructive respiratory disease and psychiatric conditions and physical characteristics.

RESULTS

A total 12.5% of the sample reported a diagnosis of obstructive respiratory disease. Compared to controls, veterans with obstructive respiratory disease were more likely to be female, unmarried/partnered, lower income, residing in the Midwest, receiving VA healthcare, and had greater lifetime and childhood trauma burden. In adjusted analyses, veterans with respiratory disease had 47-91% greater odds of screening positive for current posttraumatic stress, major depressive, and generalized anxiety disorders, and had 48% greater odds of current suicide ideation. They were also more likely to have lifetime nicotine use disorder and had more medical comorbidities and more severe somatic symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Obstructive respiratory disease is prevalent among U.S. veterans and associated with significant mental and physical health burden. Results highlight the need for timely screening and treatment for psychiatric and medical conditions that are highly comorbid with obstructive respiratory disease in this population.

Perspectives of Black Adults Living with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Barriers to Cardiovascular Disease Prevention

Rationale: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Black women with COPD are at elevated risk of CVD-related mortality compared with White women. CVD risk factors are undertreated in Black men and women. However, barriers to CVD prevention from the perspective of Black individuals living with COPD have not been previously identified. Objectives: To identify barriers and facilitators for CVD prevention among Black individuals living with COPD. Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with Black participants living with COPD and attending clinics at two urban hospitals. Participants were included if they had physician-confirmed COPD diagnoses and presence of CVD or CVD risk factors. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached, with additional interviews conducted to confirm saturation. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, iteratively revising and updating the codebook by consensus of the study team. Codes were grouped into categories, subthemes, and themes. Themes were organized using the social ecological framework into individual, interpersonal, health system, and societal levels. Results: We interviewed 30 participants of mean age 67.8 ± 8.3 years; 17 (57%) were Black women and 13 (43%) were Black men. Individual-level themes were that living with COPD and resultant multimorbidity affects CVD prevention (theme 1) and that self-efficacy and advocacy affect care received (theme 2). At the interpersonal level, supportive relationships facilitate improved access to CVD prevention (theme 3). System-level themes were that health systems are not designed to support patients with COPD and CVD (theme 4) and that health systems do not deliver effective patient education (theme 5). At the societal level, structural barriers and racism prevent access to care and adoption of a healthy lifestyle (theme 6). Conclusions: We identified barriers to CVD prevention at all levels of the socioecological framework for Black individuals living with COPD. To maximize their impact, future interventions to prevent CVD among individuals with COPD can use these findings to target barriers at multiple levels.

Variations in COPD Health Care Access and Outcomes: A Rapid Review

Background

Health inequities among individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are often associated with differential access to health care and health outcomes. A greater understanding of the literature concerning such variation is necessary to determine where gaps or inequities exist along the continuum of COPD care.

Methods

A rapid review of the published and grey literature reporting variations in health care access and/or health outcomes for individuals with COPD was completed. Variation was defined as differential patterns in access indicators or outcome measures within sociodemographic categories, including age, ethnicity, geography, race, sex, and socioeconomic status. Emergent themes were identified from the included literature and synthesized narratively.

Results

Thirty-five articles were included for final review; the majority were retrospective cohort studies. Twenty-five studies assessed variation in access to health care. Key indicators included: access to spirometry testing, medication adherence, participation in pulmonary rehabilitation, and contact with general practitioners and/or respiratory specialists. Twenty-one studies assessed variation in health outcomes in COPD and key metrics included: hospital-based resource utilization (length of stay and admissions/readmissions), COPD exacerbations, and mortality. Patients who live in rural environments and those of lower socioeconomic status had both poorer access to care and outcomes at the system and patient level. Other sociodemographic variables, including ethnicity, race, age, and sex were associated with variation in health care access and outcomes, although these findings were less consistent.

Conclusion

The results of this rapid review suggest that substantial variation in access and outcomes exists for individuals with COPD, highlighting opportunities for targeted interventions and policies.

Influence of ethnicity on adherence to nonsurgical interventions for COPD: a scoping review

Objective

Poor therapeutic adherence and the contributing factors have been extensively researched in several chronic diseases, including COPD. However, the influence of ethnicity on adherence to nonsurgical treatment interventions for COPD (e.g. smoking cessation and pulmonary rehabilitation) is not well understood. This scoping review was performed to better understand variations in adherence among people from minority ethnic communities diagnosed with COPD.

Method

This scoping review was designed based on the refined frameworks of Arksey and O'Malley, developed by JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute). Systematic searches were performed across three databases: CINHAL (EBSCO), MEDLINE (Ovid) and Embase (Ovid).

Results

Out of 3654 identified records, 37 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion; these were conducted in various countries and involved populations of diverse ethnic groups diagnosed with COPD. The included studies considered provision and/or adherence to medication (n=8, 21.6%), smoking cessation (n=11, 29.7%), influenza vaccinations (n=7, 18.9%), pulmonary rehabilitation (n=11, 29.7%) and oxygen therapy (n=2, 5.4%). Outcomes varied widely between studies within a single intervention (e.g. initiation, adherence and completion of pulmonary rehabilitation programme). However, most of the included studies suggested the presence of inequalities linked to ethnicity across interventions.

Conclusion

This review indicated the presence of poor adherence to nonsurgical interventions among people from minority ethnic backgrounds living with COPD. However, due to the heterogeneity in population groups considered and compared within the individual studies, it is challenging to identify and understand the key inequalities influencing adherence to nonsurgical interventions. Further research is needed to better explore this.

Developments in smoking cessation interventions for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the past 5 years: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Smoking cessation is the most effective strategy for slowing the progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, COPD patients find it difficult to quit smoking with standard cessation interventions.

AREAS COVERED

A scoping review of smoking cessation for COPD patients was conducted by searching the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for all studies published between 1 January 2016 and 22 September 2021. Four themes were set up and 47 studies were included eventually. The majority of the included studies (61.7%, 29/47) investigated efficacy and effectiveness, including new strategies for extended treatment and mobile health (mHealth) delivery approach. Studies examining accessibility and utilization (31.9%, 15/47), safety (10.6%, 5/47), and health economics (6.4%, 3/47) were also reviewed. The quality of the included randomized controlled trials was also evaluated.

EXPERT OPINION

Pharmacotherapy combined with behavioral interventions delivered via mHealth may be a promising strategy to help COPD smokers quit. However, the overall quality of the current studies is poor, making it challenging for clinicians to make informed decisions. Future high-quality studies are needed to provide conclusive evidence on the optimal pharmacotherapies and the most cost-effective comprehensive smoking cessation interventions, particularly those integrated into disease management for smokers with COPD.

Reassessment of Home Oxygen Prescription after Hospitalization for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Potential Target for Deimplementation

Rationale: Hypoxemia associated with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often resolves with time. Current guidelines recommend that patients recently discharged with supplemental home oxygen after hospitalization should not have renewal of the prescription without assessment for hypoxemia. Understanding patterns of home oxygen reassessment is an opportunity to improve quality and value in home oxygen prescribing and may provide future targets for deimplementation.Objectives: We sought to measure the frequency of home oxygen reassessment within 90 days of hospitalization for COPD and determine the potential population eligible for deimplementation.Methods: We performed a cohort study of patients ≥40 years hospitalized for COPD at five Veterans Affairs facilities who were prescribed home oxygen at discharge. Our primary outcome was the frequency of reassessment within 90 days by oxygen saturation (Sp_O2) measurement. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients potentially eligible for discontinuation (Sp_O2 > 88%) and patients in whom oxygen was discontinued. Our primary exposures were treatment with long-acting bronchodilators, prior history of COPD exacerbation, smoking status, and pulmonary hypertension. We used a mixed-effects Poisson model to measure the association between patient-level variables and our outcome, clustered by site. We also performed a positive deviant analysis using chart review to uncover system processes associated with high-quality oxygen prescribing.Results: A total of 287 of 659 (43.6%; range 24.8-78.5% by site) patients had complete reassessment within 90 days. None of our patient-level exposures were associated with oxygen reassessment. Nearly half of those with complete reassessment were eligible for discontinuation on the basis of Medicare guidelines (43.2%; n = 124/287). When using the newest evidence available by the Long-Term Oxygen Treatment Trial, most of the cohort did not have resting hypoxemia (84.3%; 393/466) and would be eligible for discontinuation. The highest-performing Veterans Affairs facility had four care processes to support oxygen reassessment and discontinuation, versus zero to one at all other sites.Conclusions: Fewer than half of patients prescribed home oxygen after a COPD exacerbation are reassessed within 90 days. New system processes supporting timely reassessment and discontinuation of unnecessary home oxygen therapy could improve the quality and value of care.

Role of Comorbidities in Treatment and Outcomes after Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations

RATIONALE

Hospital readmissions are an important cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although comorbidities are associated with outcomes in COPD, it is unknown how they affect treatment choices.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to examine whether comorbidity was associated with readmission, mortality, and delivery of in-hospital treatment for COPD exacerbations.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study of veterans hospitalized with a COPD exacerbation to six Veterans Affairs hospitals between 2005 and 2011. We collected comorbidities in the year before hospitalization. We defined our primary outcome as readmission and/or mortality within 30 days of discharge, and treatment quality as receipt of systemic corticosteroids and respiratory antibiotics during the index hospitalization.

RESULTS

A total of 2,391 patients were included. Each one-point increase in Charlson index was associated with greater odds of readmission or death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-1.30) and reduced odds of receiving treatment with steroids and antibiotics (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.95), in adjusted analyses. Patients with comorbid congestive heart failure (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52-0.79), coronary artery disease (aOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89), and chronic kidney disease (aOR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55-0.99) were less likely to receive corticosteroids and antibiotic treatment than patients without those comorbidities. We did not identify any comorbidity that was associated with increased odds of receiving appropriate therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbidity was associated with 30-day readmission and mortality, and with delivery of fewer treatments known to be beneficial among patients with COPD exacerbation.

Quality of Care Delivered to Veterans with COPD Exacerbation and the Association with 30-Day Readmission and Death

Quality of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care is thought to be an important intermediate process to improve the well-being of patients admitted to hospital for exacerbation. We sought to examine the quality of inpatient COPD care and the associations with readmission and mortality. We performed a cohort study of 2,364 veterans aged over 40 and hospitalized for COPD between 2005 and 2011 at five Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals. We examined whether patients received six guideline recommended care items including short-acting bronchodilators, corticosteroids, antibiotics, positive-pressure ventilation (in cases of acute hypercarbic respiratory failure), chest imaging, and arterial blood gas measurement. Our primary outcome was all-cause hospital readmission or death within 30 days. Overall quality of care was not significantly associated with readmission or death (acute care aOR 0.98; 95% CI 0.87-1.11; ICU aOR 0.89; 95% CI 0.71-1.13). Delivery of corticosteroids and antibiotics was associated with reduced odds of readmission and death (aOR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61-0.92). Few patients received all of the recommended care items (18% of acute care, 38% of ICU patients). Quality of care did not vary by race or sex but did vary significantly across sites and did not improve over time. Our composite measure of COPD care quality was not associated with readmission or death. Further efforts are needed to improve care delivery to patients hospitalized with COPD.

Critical steps in the path to using cessation pharmacotherapy following hospital-initiated tobacco treatment

Background

Hospital-initiated smoking cessation interventions utilizing pharmacotherapy increase post-discharge quit rates. Use of smoking cessation medications following discharge may further increase quit rates. This study aims to identify individual, smoking-related and hospitalization-related predictors of engagement in three different steps in the smoking cessation pharmacotherapy utilization process: 1) receiving medications as inpatient, 2) being discharged with a prescription and 3) using medications at 1-month post-hospitalization, while accounting for associations between these steps.

Methods

Study data come from a clinical trial (N = 1054) of hospitalized smokers interested in quitting who were randomized to recieve referral to a quitline via either warm handoff or fax. Variables were from the electronic health record, the state tobacco quitline, and participant self-report. Relationships among the predictors and the steps in cessation medication utilization were assessed using bivariate analyses and multivariable path analysis.

Results

Twenty-eight percent of patients reported using medication at 1-month post-discharge. Receipt of smoking cessation medications while hospitalized (OR = 2.09, 95%CI [1.39, 3.15], p < .001) and discharge with a script (OR = 4.88, 95%CI [3.34, 7.13], p < .001) were independently associated with medication use at 1-month post-hospitalization. The path analysis also revealed that the likelihood of being discharged with a script was strongly influenced by receipt of medication as an inpatient (OR = 6.61, 95%CI [4.66, 9.38], p < .001). A number of other treatment- and individual-level factors were associated with medication use in the hospital, receipt of a script, and use post-discharge.

Conclusions

To encourage post-discharge smoking cessation medication use, concerted effort should be made to engage smokers in tobacco treatment while in hospital. The individual and hospital-level factors associated with each step in the medication utilization process provide good potential targets for future implementation research to optimize treatment delivery and outcomes.

Trial registration

Number: NCT01305928.

Date registered: February 24, 2011.

National Trends in Smoking Cessation Medication Prescriptions for Smokers With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the United States, 2007-2012

Objectives

Smoking cessation decreases morbidity and mortality due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation is highly effective. However, the optimal prescription rate of smoking cessation medications among smokers with COPD has not been systemically studied. The purpose of this study was to estimate the national prescription rates of smoking cessation medications among smokers with COPD and to examine any disparities therein.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study using National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data from 2007 to 2012. We estimated the national prescription rate for any smoking cessation medication (varenicline, bupropion, and nicotine replacement therapy) each year. Multiple survey logistic regression was performed to characterize the effects of demographic variables and comorbidities on prescriptions.

Results

The average prescription rate of any smoking cessation medication over 5 years was 3.64%. The prescription rate declined each year, except for a slight increase in 2012: 9.91% in 2007, 4.47% in 2008, 2.42% in 2009, 1.88% in 2010, 1.46% in 2011, and 3.67% in 2012. Hispanic race and depression were associated with higher prescription rates (odds ratio [OR], 5.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59 to 16.67 and OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.26 to 5.51, respectively). There were no significant differences according to insurance, location of the physician, or other comorbidities. The high OR among Hispanic population and those with depression was driven by the high prescription rate of bupropion.

Conclusions

The prescription rate of smoking cessation medications among smokers with COPD remained low throughout the study period. Further studies are necessary to identify barriers and to develop strategies to overcome them.

Association between race and receipt of counselling or medication for smoking cessation in primary care

BACKGROUND

Previous evidence of race disparities in smoking cessation treatment has been limited to mostly survey studies which increase the potential for recall bias. We examined if African American versus white patients in primary care are less likely to receive any treatment or if race disparities are specific to the type of treatment offered using data pulled from a large electronic health record system.

METHODS

Medical record data from 3510 white and 2707 African American patients were available from primary care encounters between 2008 and 2015 and was used to define smoking status, cessation treatments (counselling and medication), and covariates. The association between race and type of smoking cessation treatment offered was measured by logistic regression models before and after adjusting for covariates.

RESULTS

Smoking cessation counselling was offered to 9.3% of African American and 7.8% of white patients, and a prescription for smoking cessation medication was offered to 12.3% of African American and 16.4% of white patients. After adjusting for covariates in logistic regression models, whites were significantly less likely than African American patients to receive smoking cessation counselling [odds ratio (OR) = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.65-0.99] and were significantly more likely to receive a prescription for a smoking cessation medication (OR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.03-1.47).

CONCLUSIONS

Less than 20% of smokers received any type of therapy to assist in smoking cessation. We observed a race disparity in type of smoking cessation therapy provided to white and African American primary care patients. Further research is needed to increase treatment rates and eliminate disparities.