1
|
Kosai NR, Ali AA, Ghita R, Muthkumaran G, Ali I, Loo GH, Hayati F. One-Year Outcomes in a Supervised Program of Swallowable Intragastric Balloon-Analysis of 486 Patients in a High-Volume Bariatric Centre in Malaysia. Obes Surg 2024:10.1007/s11695-024-07414-y. [PMID: 39042306 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07414-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The swallowable intragastric balloon (IGB) has recently emerged as a popular alternative for weight loss in Malaysia. It can reduce total body weight loss (TBWL) by 6-15%. We aim to observe positive weight loss up to a year after the swallowable IGB is implanted. METHODS A total of 486 consecutive patients with overweight or obesity who underwent swallowable IGB insertion were included in this prospective data collection. RESULTS Out of 486 patients, 404 patients (83%) had complete data at the end of 4 and 12 months. Patients included in the study had a starting mean body mass index of 35.3 ± 7.2 kg/m2 which decreased to 31.5 ± 5.7 kg/m2 (p < 0.0001) at the end of 4 months and further reduced to 30.3 ± 5.4 kg/m2 (p < 0.0001) at the end of 12 months. At 4 months, the overall average weight loss was 9.8 kg, meanwhile, at 12 months, the average weight loss increased to 12.9 kg. At 4 months, the average TBWL was 10.5%, while at the end of 1 year, the combined %TBWL increased to 13.7%. CONCLUSION Most weight loss is typically observed within the first 4 months following the procedure. However, it is important to note that patients can continue to experience ongoing weight loss for up to 1 year. The swallowable IGB is a safe and effective option for patients seeking weight loss solutions. It offers numerous advantages, especially its non-invasive procedureless nature, which makes it more appealing to individuals considering this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nik Ritza Kosai
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Cheras, Malaysia
- Upper Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Cheras, Malaysia
| | - Aishath Azna Ali
- Department of Surgery, Indira Gandhi Memorial Hospital, 20402, Malé, Republic of Maldives
| | - Ryan Ghita
- Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK
| | - Guhan Muthkumaran
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Cheras, Malaysia
| | - Ismail Ali
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Cheras, Malaysia
| | - Guo Hou Loo
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Cheras, Malaysia
| | - Firdaus Hayati
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, 88450, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Martins MF, De la Hoz Gomez A, Manivannan A, Shapira‐Daniels A, Campbell Reardon CL. Gastric outlet obstruction due to an intragastric balloon in a patient returning from the Caribbean. Clin Case Rep 2024; 12:e8509. [PMID: 38333653 PMCID: PMC10849985 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.8509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Key Clinical Message Gastric outlet obstruction can be a dangerous complication of intragastric balloons, as it can result in severe metabolic alkalosis. As weight loss procedures and medical tourism become more popular, physicians should have a high index of suspicion for complications of invasive procedures, particularly in returning travelers. Abstract Intragastric balloons for weight loss have decreased in frequency in the United States. However, they are still frequent in low- and middle-income countries. Severe complications occur in less than 3% of patients who undergo this procedure. Herein, we present a case of gastric outlet obstruction, severe metabolic alkalosis, and refeeding syndrome in a patient returning from the Dominican Republic. She presented with 2 weeks of emesis and obstipation, followed by a pre-syncope and altered mental status. An intragastric mass was observed on computerized tomography, which was characterized as an intragastric balloon and retrieved endoscopically. All metabolic derangements were corrected, and the patient improved without sequelae. As weight loss procedures and medical tourism become more popular, physicians should have a high index of suspicion for complications of invasive procedures, particularly in returning travelers.
Collapse
|
3
|
Ameen S, Merchant HA. Intragastric balloons for obesity: critical review of device design, efficacy, tolerability, and unmet clinical needs. Expert Rev Med Devices 2024; 21:37-54. [PMID: 38030993 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2289691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sustaining a healthy weight is a challenge and obesity, with associated risk of co-morbidities, is a major public health concern. Bariatric surgery has shown a great promise for many where pharmacological and lifestyle interventions failed to work. However, challenges and limitations associated with bariatric surgery has pushed the demand for less invasive, reversible (anatomically) interventions, such as intragastric balloons (IGBs). AREAS COVERED This review critically appraises IGBs used in the past, present, and those in clinical trials, discussing the device designs, limitations, placement and removal techniques, patient eligibility, efficacy, and safety issues. EXPERT OPINION Several intragastric balloons were developed over the years that brought excitement to patients and healthcare professionals alike. Albeit good efficacy, there had been several safety issues reported with IGBs such as spontaneous deflation, intestinal occlusion, gut perforation, and mucosal ulcerations. This led to evolution of IGBs design; device material, filling mechanism, fluid type, inflation volume, and further innovations to ease ingestion and removal of device. There are some IGB devices under development aimed to swallow like a conventional pill and excrete naturally through defecation, however, how successful they will be in clinical practice in terms of their efficacy and tolerability remains to be seen in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Ameen
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK
| | - Hamid A Merchant
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK
- Department of Bioscience, School of Health, Sport and Bioscience, University of East London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sharaiha RZ, Shikora S, White KP, Macedo G, Toouli J, Kow L. Summarizing Consensus Guidelines on Obesity Management: A Joint, Multidisciplinary Venture of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity & Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) and World Gastroenterology Organisation (WGO). J Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 57:967-976. [PMID: 37831466 PMCID: PMC10566600 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Reem Z. Sharaiha
- Department of Gastroenterology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Scott Shikora
- Center for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kevin P. White
- ScienceRight International Health Research Consulting (SRIHRC), London, ON, Canada
| | - Guilherme Macedo
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Jim Toouli
- Department of Surgery, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Lillian Kow
- Department of Surgery, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Norton BC, Telese A, Papaefthymiou A, Aslam N, Makaronidis J, Murray C, Haidry R. Metabolic and Bariatric Endoscopy: A Mini-Review. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1905. [PMID: 37763308 PMCID: PMC10532500 DOI: 10.3390/life13091905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
We are currently in a worldwide obesity pandemic, which is one of the most significant health problems of the 21st century. As the prevalence of obesity continues to rise, new and innovate treatments are becoming available. Metabolic and bariatric endoscopic procedures are exciting new areas of gastroenterology that have been developed as a direct response to the obesity crisis. These novel interventions offer a potentially reversible, less invasive, safer, and more cost-effective method of tackling obesity compared to traditional bariatric surgery. Minimally invasive endoscopic treatments are not entirely novel, but as technology has rapidly improved, many of the procedures have been proven to be extremely effective for weight loss and metabolic health, based on high-quality clinical trial data. This mini-review examines the existing evidence for the most prominent metabolic and bariatric procedures, followed by a discussion on the future trajectory of this emerging subspecialty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Charles Norton
- Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic London, 33 Grosvenor Pl, London SW1X 7HY, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospital Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
- Centre for Obesity Research, Rayne Institute, Department of Medicine, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Andrea Telese
- Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic London, 33 Grosvenor Pl, London SW1X 7HY, UK
- Centre for Obesity Research, Rayne Institute, Department of Medicine, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Apostolis Papaefthymiou
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospital Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Nasar Aslam
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospital Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Janine Makaronidis
- Centre for Obesity Research, Rayne Institute, Department of Medicine, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
- Bariatric Centre for Weight Management and Metabolic Surgery, University College London Hospital, London WC1E 6BT, UK
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University College London Hospital, London WC1E 6BT, UK
- National Institute of Health Research, UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - Charles Murray
- Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic London, 33 Grosvenor Pl, London SW1X 7HY, UK
| | - Rehan Haidry
- Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic London, 33 Grosvenor Pl, London SW1X 7HY, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jense MTF, Palm-Meinders IH, Sanders B, Boerma EJG, Greve JWM. The Swallowable Intragastric Balloon Combined with Lifestyle Coaching: Short-Term Results of a Safe and Effective Weight Loss Treatment for People Living with Overweight and Obesity. Obes Surg 2023:10.1007/s11695-023-06573-8. [PMID: 37012502 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06573-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some patients with overweight or obesity are not eligible for surgery according to international guidelines or do not wish a surgical intervention. For these patients, different treatment options are being explored. In this study, we examined the effectiveness of the swallowable intragastric balloon (IB) combined with lifestyle coaching, in patients living with overweight and obesity. METHOD A retrospective data study was conducted on patients with a swallowable IB placement between December 2018 and July 2021, combined with a 12-month coaching program. Before balloon placement, patients underwent multidisciplinary screening. The IB was swallowed and filled with fluid once in the stomach and naturally excreted around 16 weeks. RESULTS A total of 336 patients, 71.7% female, were included with a mean age of 45.7 (±11.7) years. Mean baseline weight and BMI were 107.54 (±19.16) kg and 36.1 (±5.02) kg/m2. After 1 year, the mean total weight loss was 11.0% (±8.4). The mean placement duration was 13.1 (±2.82) min, and in 43.7%, a stylet was used to facilitate placement. The most common symptoms were nausea (80.4%) and gastric pain (80.3%). In the majority of patients, complaints were resolved within a week. The early deflation of the balloon occurred in 8 patients (2.4%) of which one showed symptoms suggesting a gastric outlet obstruction. CONCLUSION Given the low rate of long-term complaints while providing a positive effect on weight loss, we conclude that the swallowable intragastric balloon, combined with lifestyle coaching, is a safe and effective treatment option for patients living with overweight and obesity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marijn T F Jense
- Bariatric Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419, Heerlen, PC, Netherlands.
- Dutch Obesity Clinic South, John F. Kennedylaan 301, 6419, Heerlen, XZ, Netherlands.
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Inge H Palm-Meinders
- Dutch Obesity Clinic South, John F. Kennedylaan 301, 6419, Heerlen, XZ, Netherlands
| | - Boy Sanders
- Dutch Obesity Clinic South, John F. Kennedylaan 301, 6419, Heerlen, XZ, Netherlands
| | - Evert-Jan G Boerma
- Bariatric Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419, Heerlen, PC, Netherlands
- Dutch Obesity Clinic South, John F. Kennedylaan 301, 6419, Heerlen, XZ, Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem M Greve
- Bariatric Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Henri Dunantstraat 5, 6419, Heerlen, PC, Netherlands
- Dutch Obesity Clinic South, John F. Kennedylaan 301, 6419, Heerlen, XZ, Netherlands
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mauro A, Lusetti F, Scalvini D, Bardone M, De Grazia F, Mazza S, Pozzi L, Ravetta V, Rovedatti L, Sgarlata C, Strada E, Torello Viera F, Veronese L, Olivo Romero DE, Anderloni A. A Comprehensive Review on Bariatric Endoscopy: Where We Are Now and Where We Are Going. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:medicina59030636. [PMID: 36984637 PMCID: PMC10052707 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59030636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
Background: Obesity is a chronic disease that impairs quality of life and leads to several comorbidities. When conservative therapies fail, bariatric surgical options such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the most effective therapies to induce persistent weight loss. Over the last two decades, bariatric endoscopy has become a valid alternative to surgery in specific settings. Primary bariatric endoscopic therapies: Restrictive gastric procedures, such as intragastric balloons (IGBs) and endoscopic gastroplasty, have been shown to be effective in inducing weight loss compared to diet modifications alone. Endoscopic gastroplasty is usually superior to IGBs in maintaining weight loss in the long-term period, whereas IGBs have an established role as a bridge-to-surgery approach in severely obese patients. IGBs in a minority of patients could be poorly tolerated and require early removal. More recently, novel endoscopic systems have been developed with the combined purpose of inducing weight loss and improving metabolic conditions. Duodenal mucosal resurfacing demonstrated efficacy in this field in its early trials: significant reduction from baseline of HbA1c values and a modest reduction of body weight were observed. Other endoscopic malabsorptive have been developed but need more evidence. For example, a pivotal trial on duodenojejunal bypasses was stopped due to the high rate of severe adverse events (hepatic abscesses). Optimization of these more recent malabsorptive endoscopic procedures could expand the plethora of bariatric patients that could be treated with the intention of improving their metabolic conditions. Revisional bariatric therapies: Weight regain may occur in up to one third of patients after bariatric surgery. Different endoscopic procedures are currently performed after both RYGB and SG in order to modulate post-surgical anatomy. The application of argon plasma coagulation associated with endoscopic full-thickness suturing systems (APC-TORe) and Re-EndoSleeve have shown to be the most effective endoscopic treatments after RYGB and SG, respectively. Both procedures are usually well tolerated and have a very low risk of stricture. However, APC-TORe may sometimes require more than one session to obtain adequate final results. The aim of this review is to explore all the currently available primary and revisional endoscopic bariatric therapies focusing on their efficacy and safety and their potential application in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurelio Mauro
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Lusetti
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Specialization School of Diseases of Digestive System Pavia, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Davide Scalvini
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Specialization School of Diseases of Digestive System Pavia, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Marco Bardone
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Federico De Grazia
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Stefano Mazza
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Lodovica Pozzi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Valentina Ravetta
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Laura Rovedatti
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Carmelo Sgarlata
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Elena Strada
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Torello Viera
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Letizia Veronese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Daniel Enrique Olivo Romero
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Hospital Nacional Zacamil, San Salvador 01120, El Salvador
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Palermo M, Davrieux CF. Swallowable Intragastric Balloon: First Consecutive Experience in Argentina. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2023; 33:146-149. [PMID: 35904926 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2022.0340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Swallowable balloons are innovative devices for the treatment of obesity. Endoscopy or anesthesia for implantation is not required. They are generally well tolerated and experience reports satisfactory results in relation to weight loss. The objective of this study was to analyze the first experience with the implementation of a swallowable balloon in Argentina. Methods: It is a descriptive retrospective observational study on the treatment of obesity in patients who underwent swallowable balloons in Argentina, admitted to one center, in a period time of 12 months with a follow-up of 6 months. Results: A total of n = 153 patients were recruited between June 2021 and May 2022, 78% were women and 22% men. The average age was 39 years. Average body mass index was 29.5 kg/m2. Balloon implantation was performed with complete swallowing by the patients in 19.4% of the cases, swallowing with operator assistance in 55.5%, and swallowing with stylet assistance in 25%. The adverse effects reported were abdominal pain (80%), nausea (60%), vomiting (38%), headache (36%), gastroesophageal reflux (29%), constipation (11%), and diarrhea (7%). No deaths were reported. A mean 4-month weight loss of 12% was reported. Conclusion: Swallowable balloon for the treatment of obesity is effective, safe, and well tolerated. Adverse effects are not severe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariano Palermo
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Diagnomed Affiliated Institution to the University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - C Federico Davrieux
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Diagnomed Affiliated Institution to the University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abu Dayyeh BK, Maselli DB, Rapaka B, Lavin T, Noar M, Hussan H, Chapman CG, Popov V, Jirapinyo P, Acosta A, Vargas EJ, Storm AC, Bazerbachi F, Ryou M, French M, Noria S, Molina D, Thompson CC. Adjustable intragastric balloon for treatment of obesity: a multicentre, open-label, randomised clinical trial. Lancet 2021; 398:1965-1973. [PMID: 34793746 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02394-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intragastric balloons are anatomy-preserving, minimally invasive obesity therapies. Enhanced tolerance and durability could help broaden clinical adoption. We investigated the safety and efficacy of an adjustable intragastric balloon (aIGB) in adults with obesity. METHODS In this prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomised clinical trial done at seven US sites, adults aged 22-65 years with obesity were randomly assigned (2:1) to aIGB with lifestyle intervention or lifestyle intervention alone (control) for 32 weeks. Balloon volume could be increased to facilitate weight loss or decreased for tolerability. Coprimary endpoints included mean percentage total bodyweight loss and responder rate (≥5% total bodyweight loss) at 32 weeks. We used a multiple imputed intention-to-treat population analysis. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02812160. FINDINGS Between Aug 9, 2016, and Dec 7, 2018, we randomly assigned 288 patients to aIGB (n=187 [65%]) or control (n=101 [35%]) groups. Mean total bodyweight loss at 32 weeks was 15·0% (95% CI 13·9-16·1) in the aIGB group versus 3·3% (2·0-4·6) in the control group (p<0·0001). Clinical response was observed in 171 (92%) patients in the aIGB group. Adjustments to the aIGB occurred in 145 (80%) patients for weight loss plateau or intolerance. Upward volume adjustment facilitated an additional mean 5·2% (4·5-5·8) total bodyweight loss. Downward volume adjustment allowed 21 (75%) patients in the aIGB group to complete the full duration of therapy. Intolerance caused early removal of the device in 31 (17%) patients. No micronutrient deficiencies were observed in the aIGB cohort. Device-related serious adverse events were observed in seven (4%) patients, without any deaths. INTERPRETATION When aIGB was combined with lifestyle modification, significant weight loss was achieved and maintained for 6 months following removal. Balloon volume adjustability permitted individualised therapy, maximising weight loss and tolerance. FUNDING Spatz Medical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barham K Abu Dayyeh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Daniel B Maselli
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Babusai Rapaka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Thomas Lavin
- Surgical Associates of Louisiana, Metairie, LA, USA
| | - Mark Noar
- Endoscopic MicroSurgery Associates, Towson, MD, USA
| | - Hisham Hussan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Christopher G Chapman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Violeta Popov
- Division of Gastroenterology, NYU Langone Health, VA Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pichamol Jirapinyo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andres Acosta
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Eric J Vargas
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Andrew C Storm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Fateh Bazerbachi
- CentraCare, Interventional Endoscopy Program, St Cloud Hospital, St Cloud, MN, USA
| | - Marvin Ryou
- Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Sabrena Noria
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Daniel Molina
- Biostatistics and Clinical Data Management, Technical Resources International, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Loo JH, Lim YH, Seah HL, Chong AZQ, Tay KV. Intragastric Balloon as Bridging Therapy Prior to Bariatric Surgery for Patients with Severe Obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m 2): a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obes Surg 2021; 32:489-502. [PMID: 34787766 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05772-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Bariatric surgery for patients with severe obesity (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 50kg/m2) is technically challenging. Intragastric balloon (IGB) has been proposed for weight loss before bariatric surgery to reduce surgical risks but its efficacy remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of IGB as bridging therapy and assess potential complications. Amongst 2419 citations, 13 studies were included. IGB resulted in a BMI reduction of 6.60 kg/m2 (MD=6.60, 95% CI: 5.06-8.15; I2=72%). The total post-procedural complication rate was 8.13% (95% CI: 4.04-13.17%), with majority being balloon intolerance. Overall, IGB is effective as a bridging therapy with adequate procedural safety profile, but further study is needed to evaluate the risk reduction for bariatric surgery and long-term weight-loss outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Hong Loo
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Yao Hui Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hwee Ling Seah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Kon Voi Tay
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of General Surgery, Woodlands Health Campus, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ramai D, Singh J, Mohan BP, Madedor O, Brooks OW, Barakat M, Ofosu A, Khan SR, Chandan S, Dhindsa B, Dhaliwal A, Facciorusso A, McDonough S, Adler DG. Influence of the Elipse Intragastric Balloon on Obesity and Metabolic Profile: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2021; 55:836-841. [PMID: 33394629 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intragastric balloons (IGBs) have been used to bridge the obesity treatment gap with the benefits of being minimally invasive but still required endoscopy. The Elipse IGB is a swallowable balloon that is spontaneously excreted at ∼16 weeks. However, studies are limited by small sample sizes. The authors aim to assess clinically relevant endpoints, namely weight loss outcomes, metabolic profile, balloon tolerability, and adverse events. METHODS A literature search was performed from several databases from inception to July 2020. The pooled means and proportions of our data were analyzed using a random effects model. RESULTS Seven studies involving 2152 patients met our eligibility criteria and were included. The mean baseline body mass index ranged from 32.1 to 38.6. The pooled mean difference (MD) in body mass index was 0.88 [confidence interval (CI): 0.58-1.18, I2=98%]. Total body weight loss was 12% (CI: 10.1-14.3, I2=94%) and excess body weight loss was 49.1% (CI: 30.6-67.5, I2=97%). The MD in waist circumference was 0.89 (CI: 0.72-1.05, I2=53%). MD in triglyceride level was 0.66 (CI: 0.21-1.1, I2=96%). Pooled early deflation rate was 1.8% (CI: 0.6-5.1, I2=74%). Our study also showed that the Elipse balloon was associated with less adverse events when compared with other IGBs. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis demonstrates that the Elipse intragastric balloon is a safe, effective, and tolerable device for weight loss and obesity with a minimal side effect profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jameel Singh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mathers Hospital, Port Jefferson, NY
| | - Babu P Mohan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Ogenetega Madedor
- Department of Medicine, Spectrum Health Hospital/Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, MI
| | - Olivia W Brooks
- Department of Internal Medicine
- St. George's University School of Medicine, Grenada, WI
| | - Mohamed Barakat
- Division of Gastroenterology, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Shahab R Khan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, II
| | - Saurabh Chandan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center
| | - Banreet Dhindsa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Amaninder Dhaliwal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Stephanie McDonough
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Douglas G Adler
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
The field of endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapy has rapidly evolved from offering endoscopic treatment of weight regain following bariatric surgery to providing primary weight loss options as alternatives to pharmacologic and surgical interventions. Gastric devices and remodeling procedures were initially designed to work through a mechanism of volume restriction, leading to earlier satiety and reduced caloric intake. As the field continues to grow, small bowel interventions are evolving that may have some effect on weight loss but focus on the treatment of obesity-related comorbidities. Future implementation of combination therapy that utilizes both gastric and small bowel interventions offers an exciting option to further augment weight loss and alleviate metabolic disease. This review considers gastric devices and techniques including space-occupying intragastric balloons, aspiration therapy, endoscopic tissue suturing, and plication interventions, followed by a review of small bowel interventions including endoluminal bypass liners, duodenal mucosal resurfacing, and endoscopically delivered devices to create incisionless anastomoses. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Medicine, Volume 73 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell D Dolan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA;
| | - Allison R Schulman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA; .,Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stavrou G, Shrewsbury A, Kotzampassi K. Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 13:238-259. [PMID: 34512874 PMCID: PMC8394181 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i8.238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopically placed intragastric balloons (IGBs) have played a significant role in obesity treatment over the last 30 years, successfully bridging the gap between lifestyle modification/pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery. Since they provide a continuous sensation of satiety that helps the ingestion of smaller portions of food, facilitating maintenance of a low-calorie diet, they have generally been considered an effective and reversible, less invasive, non-surgical procedure for weight loss. However, some studies indicate that balloons have limited sustainable effectiveness for the vast majority attempting such therapy, resulting in a return to the previous weight after balloon removal. In this review we try to summarize the pros and cons of various balloon types, to guide decision making for both the physician and the obese individual looking for effective treatment. We analyzed the six most commonly used IGBs, namely the liquid-filled balloons Orbera, Spatz3, ReShape Duo and Elipse, and the gas-filled Heliosphere and Obalon - also including comments on the adjustable Spatz3, and the swallowable Obalon and Elipse - to optimize the choice for maximum efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Stavrou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge CB22QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Anne Shrewsbury
- Department of Surgery, Endoscopy Unit, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54636, Greece
| | - Katerina Kotzampassi
- Department of Surgery, Endoscopy Unit, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54636, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Staudenmann DA, Sui Z, Saxena P, Kaffes AJ, Marinos G, Kumbhari V, Aepli P, Sartoretto A. Endoscopic bariatric therapies for obesity: a review. Med J Aust 2021; 215:183-188. [PMID: 34333788 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
▪ Obesity is reaching pandemic proportions globally, with overweight or obesity affecting at least two-thirds of Australian adults. ▪ Bariatric surgery is an effective weight loss strategy but is constrained by high resource requirements and low patient acceptance. ▪ Multiple endoscopic bariatric therapies have matured, with well established and favourable safety and efficacy profiles in multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and are best used within a multidisciplinary setting as an adjuvant to lifestyle intervention. ▪ Three types of intragastric balloon are currently in use in Australia offering average total weight loss ranging from 10% to 18%, with others available internationally. ▪ Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty produces average total weight loss of 15-20% with low rates of severe complications, with RCT data anticipated in December 2021. ▪Bariatric and metabolic endoscopy is rapidly evolving, with many novel, promising therapies currently under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominic A Staudenmann
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW.,Praxis Balsiger Seibold und Partner, Bern, Switzerland.,Université de Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Arthur J Kaffes
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
The Efficacy and Safety of a Procedureless Gastric Balloon for Weight Loss: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obes Surg 2021; 30:3341-3346. [PMID: 32266698 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-04522-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intragastric balloons have been used to bridge the obesity treatment gap with the benefits of being minimally invasive but still required endoscopy. The Elipse intragastric balloon (EIGB) is a swallowable balloon that is spontaneously excreted through a natural orifice at approximately 16 weeks. Several concerns exist, including the treatment efficacy and risk of bowel obstruction. Our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EIGB. METHODS A literature search was performed from several databases from database inception to November 2019. Eligible studies must report percent total weight loss (%TWL) after completion of treatment and adverse events. The pooled means and proportions of our data were analyzed using random effects model, generic inverse variance method. RESULTS Six studies involving 2013 unique patients met our eligibility criteria and were included. The mean baseline BMI ranged from 30.6 to 36.2. The pooled early removal rate was 2.3% (95% CI, 1.1-3.5%; I2 31%). The pooled %TWL after completion of treatment (4-6 months) was 12.8% (95% CI, 11.6-13.9%; I2 83%) and at 12 months was 10.9% (95% CI, 5.0-16.9%, I2 98%). For serious adverse events, three patients had small bowel obstruction, and one patient had gastric perforation requiring surgery. Early expulsion by emesis and early deflation were seen in 3 and 9 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis demonstrates that EIGB is a safe device offering an effective weight loss that warrants further studies for its long-term weight loss outcomes. Severe adverse events are rare, and the rate of early removal is low.
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Purpose The Elipse balloon is a novel, non-endoscopic option for weight
loss. It is swallowed and filled with fluid. After 4 months, the balloon
self-empties and is excreted naturally. Aim of the study was to evaluate safety
and efficacy of Elipse balloon in a large, multicenter, population. Materials and Methods Data from 1770 consecutive Elipse balloon patients was analyzed.
Data included weight loss, metabolic parameters, ease of placement, device
performance, and complications. Results Baseline patient characteristics were mean age
38.8 ± 12, mean weight
94.6 ± 18.9 kg, and mean BMI
34.4 ± 5.3 kg/m2.
Triglycerides were 145.1 ± 62.8 mg/dL, LDL
cholesterol was 133.1 ± 48.1 mg/dL, and HbA1c was
5.1 ± 1.1%. Four-month results were WL
13.5 ± 5.8 kg, %EWL
67.0 ± 64.1, BMI reduction 4.9 ± 2.0,
and %TBWL 14.2 ± 5.0. All metabolic parameters improved.
99.9% of patients were able to swallow the device with 35.9% requiring stylet
assistance. Eleven (0.6%) empty balloons were vomited after residence. Fifty-two
(2.9%) patients had intolerance requiring balloon removal. Eleven (0.6%)
balloons deflated early. There were three small bowel obstructions requiring
laparoscopic surgery. All three occurred in 2016 from an earlier design of the
balloon. Four (0.02%) spontaneous hyperinflations occurred. There was one
(0.06%) case each of esophagitis, pancreatitis, gastric dilation, gastric outlet
obstruction, delayed intestinal balloon transit, and gastric perforation
(repaired laparoscopically). Conclusion The Elipse™ Balloon demonstrated an excellent safety profile.
The balloon also exhibited remarkable efficacy with 14.2% TBWL and improvement
across all metabolic parameters.
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Intragastric balloon therapy is an endoluminal treatment of obesity that is indicated for patients with moderate obesity (body mass index, 30-35 kg/m2) who have failed to lose weight with lifestyle and medical management. Treatment duration ranges from 4 to 12 months, and percent total body weight loss ranges from 6% to 15% at the time of balloon removal. Adverse events, such as bowel obstruction or gastric perforation, are rare, and early balloon removal because of intolerance is the most common complication. Long-term data are lacking, although weight regain after balloon removal seems to be common.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Klingler
- Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Mail Code H18, Cleveland, OH 44195-0001, USA.
| | - Matthew Kroh
- Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, PO Box 112412, Al Maryah Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Salmi A, Greco F, Belleri E. Ultrasound-guided insertion of the Elipse ® gastric balloon: technical details, learning curve, and perioperative outcome in 36 cases. J Ultrasound 2020; 23:593-597. [PMID: 32621121 PMCID: PMC7588567 DOI: 10.1007/s40477-020-00499-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM Our aim is to demonstrate the feasibility of real-time ultrasound-assisted insertion of the Elipse® intragastric balloon for the treatment of overweight and obese patients. METHODS A plastic gastric phantom filled with water was created to mimic the gastric lumen and to test the operator's ability to recognize the capsule containing the balloon inside. In the clinical phase, we tested the operator's ability to recognize the swallowed capsule and its progressive filling in the gastric lumen by means of ultrasound in 36 consecutive patients with a mean body mass index of 35 in an outpatient setting. RESULTS The ultrasound hyperechoic signal of the capsule in the gastric lumen was visible early on and was confirmed after the injection of a few milliliters of saline solution in the capsule with a cyst-like shape. The insertion of the balloon was successful in all cases at the first attempt, and the complete filling was monitored in real-time without the need for fluoroscopy. Postprocedure symptoms were limited to the first 24-48 h and were controlled by symptomatic therapy; endoscopic removal of the balloon because of painful distal gastric migration was necessary in one case after 3 months. CONCLUSION After a learning curve, we were able to demonstrate the placement of the balloon capsule inside the fundus of the stomach under ultrasound guidance without fluoroscopy in all patients in an outpatient setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Salmi
- Medicalspa Outpatient Clinic, Brescia, Italy.
- Liver Unit, San Camillo Hospital, via Turati, 25125, Brescia, Italy.
| | - Francesco Greco
- Medicalspa Outpatient Clinic, Brescia, Italy
- Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Schiavo L, De Stefano G, Persico F, Gargiulo S, Di Spirito F, Griguolo G, Petrucciani N, Fontas E, Iannelli A, Pilone V. A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Impact of a Low-Calorie Ketogenic vs a Standard Low-Calorie Diet on Fat-Free Mass in Patients Receiving an Elipse™ Intragastric Balloon Treatment. Obes Surg 2020; 31:1514-1523. [PMID: 33215362 PMCID: PMC8012342 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-05133-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background The Elipse™ intragastric balloon (EIGB) is a new swallowable balloon for weight loss (WL). Preserving metabolically active fat-free mass (FFM) and resting metabolic rate (RMR) during WL are crucial to maximize fat mass (FM) loss. After EIGB placement, a standard low-calorie diet (LCD) is generally prescribed. A low-calorie ketogenic diet (LCKD) has proven to be safe and effective in reducing FM while preserving FFM and RMR. Objective To prospectively compare the effects on WL, FM, FFM, and RMR in two groups of patients who were randomized to two different diets: LCKD and a standard LCD after EIGB placement. Methods WL, FM, FFM, and RMR were measured before EIGB and at 4 months in 48 patients who received either a LCKD (n = 24) or a standard LCD (n = 24). Compliance in following the prescribed diet was determined with food frequency questionnaires in all patients. The impact of LCKD and LCD on renal function was also evaluated. Results The LCKD group showed a significantly lower decrease in FFM and RMR when compared with the LCD group (3.55 vs 14.3%, p < 0.001; 9.79 vs 11.4%, p < 0.001, respectively). FM decreased more significantly with LCKD compared to LCD (41.6 vs 33.1%, p = 0.0606). Compliance in following the prescribed diets, without negative impact on renal function, was found. Conclusion Based on our findings, despite the small sample size, we were able to support the hypothesis that LCKD is associated with an increased FM loss while reducing the FFM loss and the RMR, without interfering with renal function after EIGB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Schiavo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Dentistry, “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, Fisciano, SA Italy
- Center of Excellence of Bariatric Surgery of the Italian Society of Obesity Surgery and Metabolic Disease (SICOB), Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, University Hospital San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona, Mercato San Severino, Salerno, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Persico
- Unit of General and Specialistic Surgery, A.O.R.N. dei Colli Ospedali Monaldi-Cotugno-CTO, Naples, Italy
| | - Stefano Gargiulo
- General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria La Bruna Clinic, Torre del Greco, Italy
| | - Federica Di Spirito
- Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Dentistry, “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, Fisciano, SA Italy
| | - Giulia Griguolo
- Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Dentistry, “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, Fisciano, SA Italy
| | - Niccolò Petrucciani
- Digestive Unit, Archet 2 Hospital, University Hospital of Nice, F-06202 Nice, France
| | - Eric Fontas
- Direction de la Recherche Clinique, University Hospital, Nice, France
| | - Antonio Iannelli
- Digestive Unit, Archet 2 Hospital, University Hospital of Nice, F-06202 Nice, France
- Inserm, U1065, Team 8 “Hepatic Complications of Obesity”, F-06204 Nice, France
- University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis, F-06107 Nice, France
| | - Vincenzo Pilone
- Department of Medicine, Surgery, and Dentistry, “Scuola Medica Salernitana”, University of Salerno, Fisciano, SA Italy
- Center of Excellence of Bariatric Surgery of the Italian Society of Obesity Surgery and Metabolic Disease (SICOB), Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, University Hospital San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’Aragona, Mercato San Severino, Salerno, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
One Anastomosis/Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB) as Revisional Surgery Following Primary Restrictive Bariatric Procedures: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obes Surg 2020; 31:370-383. [PMID: 33118133 PMCID: PMC7809003 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-05079-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) has gained popularity in the past decade. International databases were searched for articles published by September 10, 2020, on OAGB/MGB as a revisional procedure after restrictive procedures. Twenty-six studies examining a total of 1771 patients were included. The mean initial BMI was 45.70 kg/m2, which decreased to 31.52, 31.40, and 30.54 kg/m2 at 1, 3, and 5-year follow-ups, respectively. Remission of type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) following OAGB/MGB at 1-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up was 65.16 ± 24.43, 65.37 ± 36.07, and 78.10 ± 14.19%, respectively. Remission/improvement rate from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Also, 7.4% of the patients developed de novo GERD following OAGB/MGB. Leakage was the most common major complication. OAGB/MGB appears to be feasible and effective as a revisional procedure after failed restrictive bariatric procedures.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Current bariatric surgical practice has developed from early procedures, some of which are no longer routinely performed. This review highlights how surgical practice in this area has developed over time. RECENT FINDINGS This review outlines early procedures including jejuno-colic and jejuno-ileal bypass, initial experience with gastric bypass, vertical banded gastroplasty and biliopancreatic diversion with or without duodenal switch. The role laparoscopy has played in the widespread utilization of surgery for treatment of obesity will be described, as will the development of procedures which form the mainstay of current bariatric surgical practice including gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric banding. Endoscopic therapies for the treatment of obesity will be described. By outlining how bariatric surgical practice has developed over time, this review will help practicing surgeons understand how individual procedures have evolved and also provide insight into potential future developments in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Wiggins
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Homerton University Hospital, Homerton Row, London, E9 6SR, UK
| | - M S Majid
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Homerton University Hospital, Homerton Row, London, E9 6SR, UK
| | - S Agrawal
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Homerton University Hospital, Homerton Row, London, E9 6SR, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Efficacy of Intragastric Balloon Placement and Botulinum Toxin Injection in Bariatric Endoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2020; 30:500-503. [PMID: 32740476 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the results obtained from the combination of intragastric botulinum toxin A (IGBTA), intragastric balloon (IGB), and IGBTA(+)IGB in the treatment of obesity. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three separate treatment groups were set up. IGBTA, IGB, and IGBTA(+)IGB were administered to Group 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The body mass indexes (BMI) of patients were measured before and 6 months after the treatment. The intragroup and intergroup treatment results have been evaluated. P<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS The mean BMI decreased by 1.6 kg/m in 40 patients who received IGBTA in group 1 (P<0.001), 3.95 kg/m in 42 patients who received IGB in group 2 (P<0.001), and 4.9 kg/m in 39 patients who received IGBTA and IGB in group 3 (P<0.001) after 6 months of treatment. The intolerance because of the application was the highest in group 3, followed by group 2. CONCLUSION The treatment was most successful in group 3 followed by group 2 and group 1, respectively. The authors recommend the group 3 treatment, provided that nausea, vomiting, and flatulence have a high index of probability in such a treatment. However, when deciding between group 1 and group 2 treatments, the authors recommend opting for group 2 treatment that shows to be more efficient.
Collapse
|
23
|
Park YS, Ahn SH, Suh YS, Kim HH. Less Invasive Bariatric/Metabolic Procedures for Weight Reduction and Glucose Control. J Obes Metab Syndr 2020; 29:110-113. [PMID: 32513907 PMCID: PMC7338488 DOI: 10.7570/jomes20019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 03/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of obesity has increased steadily in Korea as well as worldwide, and bariatric surgery is the most powerful treatment modality for morbid obesity. However, fear of invasive procedures means most patients prefer less invasive procedures. New treatment modalities for obesity are emerging, but in Korea, only one traditional gastric balloon is approved by the government. Although it is difficult to introduce new techniques in Korea because of the high entry barrier presented by the country’s national health insurance system, it is important for physicians and surgeons to be aware of new obesity treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Suk Park
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Sang-Hoon Ahn
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Yun-Suhk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Hyung-Ho Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Orlandini B, Gallo C, Boškoski I, Bove V, Costamagna G. Procedures and devices for bariatric and metabolic endoscopy. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 13:2631774520925647. [PMID: 32548577 PMCID: PMC7271273 DOI: 10.1177/2631774520925647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 04/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Obesity is a leading cause of preventable death in developed countries, with a
rising incidence over time. Lifestyle modification, pharmacotherapy, and
bariatric surgery are the mainstays of bariatric therapy, even though burdened
by several limitations in terms of efficacy or safety. Bariatric endoscopy has
been developed in the last decades as a minimally invasive alternative, aimed to
bridge the gap between conservative and interventional conventional therapies.
This review aims to provide an updated overview of the bariatric and metabolic
available endoscopic procedures and to drive the choice of the right procedure
for the right patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice Orlandini
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Camilla Gallo
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ivo Boškoski
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli, 8 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bove
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Guido Costamagna
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Obesity poses a significant health care concern in the United States, with 39.8% of adults being classified as obese. Several different methods have been introduced to combat obesity, from medical therapy to surgical options. Bariatric surgery has been demonstrated to be superior to medical therapy alone for weight loss in obese patients. Despite this information, only about 1% of eligible patients undergo bariatric surgery per year. The reason for this treatment gap is multifactorial, but patient apprehension to undergo surgery is a major driving force. Many patients perceive bariatric surgery as dangerous, and believe that living with their current weight is safer than undergoing surgery. To combat this treatment gap, endoscopic therapies have been developed to reach more patients in a less invasive way. This article will review endoscopic treatment options currently available and approved by the Food and Drug Administration, as well as other treatment modalities that are currently in development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leena Khaitan
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Cleveland, OH
| | - Brian Shea
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gollisch KSC, Raddatz D. Endoscopic intragastric balloon: a gimmick or a viable option for obesity? ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:S8. [PMID: 32309412 PMCID: PMC7154325 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.67] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Worldwide, the prevalence of obesity has doubled since 1980 in 70 countries. More than one in three adults now suffer from overweight or obesity. Health problems related to obesity include orthopedic problems, psychiatric conditions, metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, and of increasing concern, cancer. Thus, obesity has an enormous impact on the individual’s wellbeing as well as on society’s workforce and health care expenses. Medical efforts are ongoing to find safe and effective treatment options for obesity and its metabolic implications. At present, available treatment options include lifestyle interventions, pharmacotherapy, endoscopic applications, and bariatric surgery. Within the range of endoscopic treatment options, the intragastric balloon is the most widely used device. The idea is simple: the gastric volume is reduced by a balloon that is in most cases implanted by an endoscopic procedure similar to a gastroscopy. During the past decades, different models have been developed, which we will briefly introduce in this review. We aim at reviewing the pathophysiology underlying the effect of endoscopic intragastric balloon on weight loss and metabolic changes. We will assess expected short-term and long-term benefits for the patient, and we will discuss common side effects as well as rare complications. We will compare endoscopic intragastric balloon to conservative treatment options with or without pharmacological support on the one hand and to the spectrum of bariatric surgery on the other hand. In most patients, obesity must be considered a chronic disease that requires a lifelong treatment concept. In view of current treatment options for obesity, we will discuss whether endoscopic intragastric balloon is a viable treatment option, and who may be the right patient to benefit from it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Susanne Claudia Gollisch
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Endocrine Unit, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Dirk Raddatz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Endocrine Unit, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Espinet Coll E, Carrasco Clavijos S, Díaz Galán P, Vila Lolo C, Gómez Valero JA, Bacchiddu S, Irigoyen D, Durán Pastor T, Mora Cubells L, Juan-Creix Comamala A. Feasibility, results and endoscopic requirements of the Elipse� swallowable intragastric balloon: initial experience. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2019; 111:921-926. [DOI: 10.17235/reed.2019.6340/2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|