Role of Routine Abdominal Ultrasound Before Bariatric Surgery: Review of 937 Patients

Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources is a common problem, constituting 10-34% of health services spending in the western world. Even though diagnostic imaging is vital for identifying correct diagnoses and administrating the right treatment, low-value imaging-in which the diagnostic test confers little to no clinical benefit-is common and contributes to inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources. There is a lack of knowledge on the types and extent of low-value imaging. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to identify, characterize, and quantify the extent of low-value diagnostic imaging examinations for adults and children.

METHODS

A scoping review of the published literature was performed. Medline-Ovid, Embase-Ovid, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published from 2010 to September 2020. The search strategy was built from medical subject headings (Mesh) for Diagnostic imaging/Radiology OR Health service misuse/Medical overuse OR Procedures and Techniques Utilization/Facilities and Services Utilization. Articles in English, German, Dutch, Swedish, Danish, or Norwegian were included.

RESULTS

A total of 39,986 records were identified and, of these, 370 studies were included in the final synthesis. Eighty-four low-value imaging examinations were identified. Imaging of atraumatic pain, routine imaging in minor head injury, trauma, thrombosis, urolithiasis, after thoracic interventions, fracture follow-up and cancer staging/follow-up were the most frequently identified low-value imaging examinations. The proportion of low-value imaging varied between 2 and 100% inappropriate or unnecessary examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive list of identified low-value radiological examinations for both adults and children are presented. Future research should focus on reasons for low-value imaging utilization and interventions to reduce the use of low-value imaging internationally.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42020208072.

Lack of benefit of routine abdominal CT-scan before bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Scientific societies recommend to seek cancer prior to bariatric surgery. In our tertiary referral center, we aimed to study performance of abdominal CT-scan before bariatric surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively included all patients who underwent bariatric surgery and a pre-operative abdominal CT-scan in our academic center, between January 2015 and December 2018.

RESULTS

We included 521 patients (417 women and 104 men) with a mean age of 48.0±11.5 years. Mean preoperative body mass index was 44.9±7.0kg/m². Among the 392 patients with abnormal CT-scan, mean number of anomalies per patient was of 2.2±1.2. Vast majority of anomalies (91.8%) were non-significant. Only 5 (1%) patients needed treatment prior to bariatric surgery. No factor predictive of abnormal CT-scan was found.

CONCLUSION

Only few patients had severe anomaly on CT-scan before bariatric surgery. Abdominal CT-scan could not be advocated to seek cancer before bariatric surgery.

The Clinical Value and Appropriateness Criteria of Upper Abdominal Magnetic Resonance Examinations in Patients Before and After Bariatric Surgery: a Study of 837 Images

PURPOSE

The abdominal magnetic resonance (MR) examinations have been increasingly applied in patients with obesity. However, few studies analyzed the appropriateness of this examination. This study is aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical value of upper abdominal MR in quantification of visceral/subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT/SAT) and liver fat fraction (LFF) in patients before and after bariatric surgery.

METHODS

All patients who underwent bariatric surgery from November 2017 to November 2019 in the prospectively maintained, IRB-approved database of our institution were queried. The images of all MR studies were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 570 patients with 837 upper abdominal MR examinations were analyzed. The VAT/SAT can be clearly visualized and quantified on fat liver acquisition with volume acceleration-flexible (LAVA-Flex) sequence. The present rate of a single axial slice at the level of the L1-L2 intervertebral disc was 93.1% (779/837). The LFF could be quantitatively evaluated on all of the proton density fat fraction (PDFF) maps (100%, 837/837). Occasional findings may include cholelithiasis, cysts, hepatic hemangioma, and renal angiomyolipoma, which can be clearly diagnosed by MR.

CONCLUSION

The upper abdominal MR is featured by well feasibility and clear clinical value when applying in patients with obesity. We can use the results to do clinical research and evaluate obesity-related disease risks before and after surgery, thus providing suggestions to choose the type of surgery for patients with different risk levels in the future. MR scanning including fat LAVA-Flex images with the inclusion of L1-L2 level and PDFF measurements is suggested for the VAT/SAT/LFF quantification.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03520699.