Conventional Versus Distal Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Randomized Controlled Trial with 1-Year Follow-up

American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery position statement on one-anastomosis gastric bypass

The following position statement is issued by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in response to inquiries made to the society by patients, physicians, society members, hospitals, health insurance payors, and others regarding one-anastomosis gastric bypass as a treatment for obesity and metabolic disease. This statement is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion, and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence available at this time. The statement may be revised in the future as more information becomes available.

Change in Mineral Status After Bariatric Surgery: a Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The risk of protein and vitamin deficiencies after bariatric surgery has been well studied, but the change in mineral status has not gotten enough attention. This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis regarding the change in mineral levels after bariatric surgery and the prevalence of postoperative mineral deficiency, with subgroup analyses of different surgical procedures, study regions, and follow-up time.

METHODS

CENTRAL, PubMed, and EMBASE were searched for related articles. Meta-analysis, subgroup analysis, and sensitivity analysis were performed if necessary.

RESULTS

A total of 107 articles with 47,432 patients were included. The most severe mineral deficiency after bariatric surgery was iron (20.1%), followed by zinc (18.3%), copper (14.4%), chlorine (12.2%), phosphorus (7.5%), and calcium (7.4%). Serum concentrations of potassium, sodium, selenium, manganese, and molybdenum showed no significant change before and after surgery. Subgroup analyses revealed that SG had fewer deficiencies in serum iron, calcium, zinc, magnesium, phosphorus, copper, and selenium than RYGB. OAGB showed a higher incidence of serum iron and zinc deficiencies than RYGB. Studies conducted in different regions also found various mineral statuses after surgery. Studies with follow-up ≥ 5 years had a lower prevalence of zinc, copper, and selenium deficiencies than follow-up < 5 years.

CONCLUSION

A high deficiency rate of serum iron, zinc, copper, chlorine, phosphorus, and calcium was seen after bariatric surgery. The difference in surgical procedures, study regions, and follow-up time may affect postoperative mineral status; more targeted mineral supplement programs are needed considering these influencing factors.

Roux-en-Y and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Surgery Are Superior to Sleeve Gastrectomy in Lowering Glucose and Cholesterol Levels Independent of Weight Loss: a Propensity-Score Weighting Analysis

BACKGROUND

The superior effects of gastric bypass surgery in preventing cardiovascular diseases compared with sleeve gastrectomy are well-established. However, whether these effects are independent of weight loss is not known.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we compared the change in cardiometabolic risks of 1073 diabetic patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (n = 265), one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) (n = 619), and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (n = 189) with equivalent weight loss from the Min-Shen General Hospital. Propensity score-weighting, multivariate regression, and matching were performed to adjust for baseline differences.

RESULTS

After 12 months, OAGB and, to a lesser extent, RYGB exhibited superior effects on glycemic control compared with SG in patients with equivalent weight loss. The effect was significant in patients with mild-to-modest BMI reduction but diminished in patients with severe BMI reduction. RYGB and OAGB had significantly greater effects in lowering total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol than SG, regardless of weight loss. The results of matching patients with equivalent weight loss yielded similar results. The longer length of bypassed biliopancreatic (BP) limbs was correlated with a greater decrease in glycemic levels, insulin resistance index, lipids, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and creatinine levels in patients receiving RYBG. It was correlated with greater decreases in BMI, fasting insulin, insulin resistance index, and C-reactive protein levels in patients receiving OAGB.

CONCLUSION

Diabetic patients receiving OAGB and RYGB had lower glucose and cholesterol levels compared with SG independent of weight loss. Our results suggest diabetic patients with cardiovascular risk factors such as hypercholesterolemia to receive bypass surgery.

Long-term outcomes of revisional one anastomosis gastric bypass post laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

PURPOSE

Revisional bariatric surgeries following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) have demonstrated a dramatic increase worldwide. Recently, one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has become a contender as an appropriate revisional procedure; however, no long-term data currently exist on the effectiveness of it as a revisional surgery post-LSG.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who underwent LSG at a public hospital in Kuwait from 2008 to 2017. A list was obtained of those who underwent revisional OAGB surgery after initial LSG, after which a phone survey was performed and demographics were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients underwent revisional OAGB post-initial LSG, of which 89.7% were female. Prior to LSG, the mean weight of the patients was 127.5 kg, and the mean BMI was 49.0 kg/m2. The mean weight loss after initial LSG was 43.8 kg, while the average duration until patients underwent revisional OAGB was 5.3 years. The cause for revision was weight regain (86.2%) or inadequate weight loss (13.8%). Prior to undergoing revisional OAGB, the weight and BMI of the patients was 110.9 kg and 42.4 kg/m2, respectively. Revisional OAGB demonstrated a %excess weight loss of 14.5%, 31.9%, 48.0%, 56.3%, 57.2%, and 54.7% at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 4 years, and 5 years, respectively. Twelve morbidities were reported during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Revisional bariatric surgery is technically demanding and may be associated with a high complication rate. However, OAGB as a revisional procedure has proven to be safe and effective in the long-term outcomes of revisional OAGB patients post-LSG.

Intrathoracic pouch migration in one-anastomosis gastric bypass with and without hiatoplasty: A 3-dimensional-computed tomography volumetry study

BACKGROUND

Currently, 4.8% of bariatric operations worldwide are one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) procedures. If a hiatal hernia is detected in a preoperative gastroscopy, OAGB can be combined with hiatoplasty. Intrathoracic pouch migration (ITM) is common after bypass procedures because the fundus, a natural abutment, is separated from the pouch.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to find out whether OAGB or OAGB combined with hiatoplasty carries a higher risk of ITM and, therefore, also gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

SETTING

University hospital.

METHODS

Fifty patients (group 1: 25× primary OAGB; group 2: 25× primary OAGB with hiatoplasty) were included in this study. History of weight, GERD, and quality of life were recorded in patient interviews and pouch volume and ITM were evaluated using 3-dimensional-computed tomography volumetry.

RESULTS

There were no differences in terms of patient characteristics, history of weight, pouch volume, or quality of life between both groups. ITM was found in group 1 in 60% (n = 15) and group 2 in 76% (n = 19) of all patients (P = .152). The ITM mean length was significantly lower in group 1 with .9 ± 1.1 cm than in group 2 with 1.8 ± 1.2 cm (P = .007). Regarding GERD, there was no difference between both groups; nevertheless, significantly more patients with ITM (38.2%; n = 13) had GERD compared with patients without ITM (6.3%; n = 1).

CONCLUSION

In primary OAGB, an additional hiatoplasty was not associated with higher rates of ITM or GERD; nevertheless, the length of ITM was higher after hiatoplasty. If ITM occurs, patients have a risk of developing GERD.

How accurate is the visual estimation of bowel length by endoscopic surgeons?

Background

Measurement of small bowel length is an essential step in performing bariatric surgery. Surgeons need to measure bowel length in order to create alimentary and biliopancreatic limbs. Inaccurate bowel measurement may affect the outcome of surgery. However, it is not clear how accurate the measurement of bowel length is by surgeons.

Methods

Two image quizzes marking certain lengths of jejunum were sent to participants. They were asked to estimate the length of marked bowels in maze quizzes. The Error of estimation, prevalence of significant error (error greater than 30 percent of actual length), and the relationship between different participant characteristics was investigated.

Results

A total of 86 participants answered the questionnaire. The mean error of estimation was 4.62 cm (27%). Twenty-eight participants (33%) had significant errors in estimation of bowel length.

Conclusion

While there are surgeons that can estimate bowel length with decent accuracy, significant errors in estimation of bowel length are not uncommon among surgeons. Surgeons should consider adopting techniques for accurate measurement of the small intestine.

Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for type 2 diabetes remission (ORDER): protocol of a multicentre, randomised controlled, open-label, superiority trial

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have demonstrated that one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is not inferior to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in treating obesity. However, high level evidence comparing the efficacy and safety of both procedures in type 2 diabetes (T2D) treatment is still lacking, which is another main aim of bariatric surgery. The presented trial has been designed to aim at investigating the superiority of OAGB over the reference procedure RYGB in treating T2D as primary endpoint. And diabetes-related microvascular and macrovascular complications, cardiovascular comorbidities, weight loss, postoperative nutritional status, quality of life and overall complications will be followed up for 5 years as secondary endpoints.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This prospective, multicentre, randomised superiority open-label trial will be conducted in patients of Asian descent. A total of 248 patients (BMI≥27.5 kg/m²) who are diagnosed with T2D will be randomly assigned (1:1) to OAGB or RYGB with blocks of four. The primary endpoint is the complete diabetes remission rate defined as HbA1c≤6.0% and fasting plasma glucose≤5.6 mmol/L without any antidiabetic medications at 1 year after surgery. All secondary endpoints will be measured at different follow-up visit points, which will start at least 3 months after enrolment, with a continuous annual follow-up for five postoperative years in order to provide solid evidence on the efficacy and safety of OAGB in patients with T2D.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the ethics committee of leading centre (Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, no. 2021-P2-037-03). The results generated from this work will be disseminated to academic audiences and the public via publications in international peer-reviewed journals and conferences. The data presented will be imported into a national data registry. Findings are expected to be available in 2025, which will facilitate clinical decision-making in the field.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05015283.

Gastrointestinal Quality of Life in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB): Derivation of a "Mini GIQLI" Score

BACKGROUND

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is now one of the mainstream bariatric surgical procedures with proven safety and efficacy. However, data on the gastrointestinal quality of life following OAGB is lacking.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database, performed at a single tertiary care teaching hospital from January 2016 until March 2021. All patients undertook the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) questionnaire. GIQLI was correlated with various parameters. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to assess the importance of each question in the questionnaire and devise a "Mini GIQLI score".

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients were included. The %TWL at 3 and 5 years was 26.2 ± 11.9%, 31.7 ± 11 respectively. The mean weight regain was 5.6 ± 8.5 kg. The mean GIQLI score was 125 ± 13.1. The mean scores for questions pertaining to gastrointestinal, social, psychological, and physical domains were 3.49, 3.7, 3.45, and 3.27 respectively. Scree plot of principal component analysis showed that a new score ("Mini GIQLI") combining only 5 questions had good correlation with the overall GIQOL score (r = 0.842). The five questions related to anxiety, fatigue, feeling unwell, loss of endurance, and feeling unfit.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients report a good score on GIQLI assessment following OAGB. The Mini GIQLI score is a quicker tool with good correlation to the full-length GIQLI score.

Effect of Biliopancreatic Limb Length on Weight Loss, Postoperative Complications, and Remission of Comorbidities in One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Aimed to evaluate the effects of biliopancreatic limb (BPL) length on weight loss, postoperative complications, and remission of comorbidities in OAGB.. An extensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases to find related OAGB articles. Both BPL length < 200 cm (by - 17.79, 95% CI - 19.23, - 16.34) and BPL length ≥ 200 cm (by - 14.93, 95% CI - 15.66, - 14.20) significantly decreased BMI. Regarding the effect of BPL length on comorbidities and postoperative complications, it was shown that BPL length < 200 cm is safer and more effective. Therefore, standardization of BPL length < 200 cm is suggested. Bypassing ≥ 200 cm of the small bowel does not ameliorate weight loss or resolve comorbidities significantly, and it is related to more frequent postoperative complications and nutritional deficiencies. Registration number in PROSPERO: PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021225499.

Quality of Life After Bariatric Surgery-a Systematic Review with Bayesian Network Meta-analysis

Objective

Comprehensive analysis and comparison of HRQoL following different bariatric interventions through systematic review with network meta-analysis.

Background

Different types of bariatric surgeries have been developed throughout the years. Apart from weight loss and comorbidities remission, improvement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important outcome of metabolic surgery.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases have been searched up to April 2020. Inclusion criteria to the analysis were (1) study with at least 2 arms comparing bariatric surgeries; (2) reporting of HRQoL with a validated tool; (3) follow-up period of 1, 2, 3, or 5 years. Network meta-analysis was conducted using Bayesian statistics. The primary outcome was HRQoL.

Results

Forty-seven studies were included in the analysis involving 26,629 patients and 11 different surgeries such as sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), gastric bypass (LRYGB), one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), and other. At 1 year, there was significant difference in HRQoL in favor of LSG, LRYGB, and OAG compared with lifestyle intervention (SMD: 0.44; 95% CrI 0.2 to 0.68 for LSG, SMD: 0.56; 95% CrI 0.31 to 0.8 for LRYGB; and SMD: 0.43; 95% CrI 0.06 to 0.8 for OAGB). At 5 years, LSG, LRYGB, and OAGB showed better HRQoL compared to control (SMD: 0.92; 95% CrI 0.58 to 1.26, SMD: 1.27; 95% CrI 0.94 to 1.61, and SMD: 1.01; 95% CrI 0.63 to 1.4, respectively).

Conclusions

LSG and LRYGB may lead to better HRQoL across most follow-up time points. Long-term analysis shows that bariatric intervention results in better HRQoL than non-surgical interventions.

Graphical abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-021-05687-1.

Assurance of surgical quality within multicenter randomized controlled trials for bariatric and metabolic surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Surgical quality assurance methods aim to ensure standardization and high quality of surgical techniques within multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs), thereby diminishing the heterogeneity of surgery and reducing biases due to surgical variation. This study aimed to establish the measures undertaken to ensure surgical quality within multicenter RCTs investigating bariatric and metabolic surgery, and their influence upon clinical outcomes.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was performed from the Embase, Medline, and Web of Science databases to identify multicenter RCTs investigating bariatric and metabolic surgery. Each RCT was evaluated against a checklist of surgical quality measures within 3 domain: (1) standardization of surgical techniques; (2) credentialing of surgical experience; and (3) monitoring of performance. Outcome measures were postoperative weight change and complications.

RESULTS

Nineteen multicenter RCTs were included in the analysis. Three studies undertook pretrial education of surgical standard. Fourteen studies described complete standardization of surgical techniques. Four studies credentialed surgeons by case volume prior to enrollment. Two studies used intraoperative or video evaluation of surgical technique prior to enrollment. Only two studies monitored performance during the study. Although there were limited quality assurance methods undertaken, utilization of these techniques was associated with reduced overall complications. Standardization of surgery was associated with reduced re-operation rates but did not influence postoperative weight loss.

CONCLUSION

The utilization of methods for surgical quality assurance are very limited within multicenter RCTs of bariatric and metabolic surgery. Future studies must implement surgical quality assurance methods to reduce variability of surgical performance and potential bias within RCTs.

IFSO Update Position Statement on One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB)

The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) issued a position statement on the role of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) in the field of bariatric/metabolic surgery in 2018 De Luca et al. (Obes Surg. 28(5):1188-206, 2018). This position statement was issued by the IFSO OAGB task force and approved by the IFSO Scientific Committee and IFSO Executive Board. In 2018, the OAGB task force recognized the necessity to update the position statement in the following 2 years since additional high-quality data could emerge. The updated IFSO position statement on OAGB was issued also in response to inquiries to the IFSO by society members, universities, hospitals, physicians, insurances, patients, policy makers, and media. The IFSO position statement on OAGB has been reviewed within 2 years according to the availability of additional scientific evidence. The recommendation of the statement is derived from peer-reviewed scientific literature and available knowledge. The IFSO update position statement on OAGB will again be reviewed in 2 years provided additional high-quality studies emerge.

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

INTRODUCTION

We aim to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

METHODS

We searched Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to May 14, 2019, without language restrictions, for randomized clinical trials comparing OAGB with RYGB in obesity. Quality of included trials was assessed by Cochrane Collaboration's tool; quality of evidence was evaluated by GRADE approach. The primary outcome was excess body mass index (BMI) loss at 2 years.

RESULTS

We identified 206 reports; after exclusions, three trials with a total of 733 patients were eligible for analysis. Compared with RYGB, OAGB was associated with more excess BMI loss at 2 years (mean difference (MD), 10.22; 95% CI, 3.05 to17.40; I² = 95%; low-quality evidence), with benefit seen in OAGB using non-obese patients (MD, 17.10; 95% CI, 15.76 to18.44; P for interaction = 0.007 ) and no benefit in OAGB using standard length of biliopancreatic limb (MD, 6.49; 95% CI, - 1.09 to 14.08). Moreover, individuals allocated to OAGB compared with RYGB had a higher remission rate of type 2 diabetes(T2D) (risk ratio (RR), 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.27; I² = 0%). No statistically significant difference was found between the two surgical groups in adverse events.

CONCLUSION

OAGB is possibly associated with more body weight loss compared with RYGB in patients with obesity, despite the low quality of evidence caused by inconsistent of the effect of biliopancreatic limb length in OAGB group. This benefit appears to be confined to OAGB using the extended length of the biliopancreatic limb but not to OAGB using the standard length of the biliopancreatic limb, compared with RYBG. Additional large clinical studies are needed to assess the impact of limb length in OAGB.

Efficacy and Drawbacks of Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass After Sleeve Gastrectomy in a Tertiary Referral Bariatric Center

Background

The need for revisional procedures after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for insufficient weight loss or weight regain, gastroesophageal reflux, or other complications is reported to be 18–36% in studies with 10-year follow-up. Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) may be performed as a revisional procedure after SG. This study aims to evaluate the short- and mid-term outcomes of SADI after SG in a referral center for bariatric surgery.

Materials and Methods

Data of patients who underwent SADI between March 2015 and March 2020 were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Follow-up comprised clinical and biochemical assessment at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively, and once a year thereafter.

Results

Overall, 106 patients underwent SADI after a previous SG. The timeframe between SG and SADI was 50 ± 31.3 months. Postoperative mortality was observed in two cases (1.8%) and morbidity in 15.1% of patients. At 24 months, %total weight loss was 37.6 ± 12.3 and %excess weight loss 76.9 ± 25.2 (64 patients). Three patients were treated for malnutrition during follow-up, two with medical treatment and one with SADI reversal.

Conclusion

SADI after SG provides effective weight loss results in the short-term, even if in the present series the postoperative complication rate was non-negligible. Further trials are needed to establish the more advantageous revisional bariatric procedure after failed SG.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-021-05323-y.

Bariatric Surgery-How Much Malabsorption Do We Need?-A Review of Various Limb Lengths in Different Gastric Bypass Procedures

The number of obese individuals worldwide continues to increase every year, thus, the number of bariatric/metabolic operations performed is on a constant rise as well. Beside exclusively restrictive procedures, most of the bariatric operations have a more or less malabsorptive component. Several different bypass procedures exist alongside each other today and each type of bypass is performed using a distinct technique. Furthermore, the length of the bypassed intestine may differ as well. One might add that the operations are performed differently in different parts of the world and have been changing and evolving over time. This review evaluates the most frequently performed bariatric bypass procedures (and their variations) worldwide: Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass, Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass + Sleeve Gastrectomy, Biliopancreatic Diversion + Duodenal Switch and operations due to weight regain. The evaluation of the procedures and different limb lengths focusses on weight loss, remission of comorbidities and the risk of malnutrition and deficiencies. This narrative review does not aim at synthesizing quantitative data. Rather, it provides a summary of carefully selected, high-quality studies to serve as examples and to draw tentative conclusions on the effects of the bypass procedures mentioned above. In conclusion, it is important to carefully choose the procedure and small bowel length excluded from the food passage suited best to each individual patient. A balance has to be achieved between sufficient weight loss and remission of comorbidities, as well as a low risk of deficiencies and malnutrition. In any case, at least 300 cm of small bowel should always remain in the food stream to prevent the development of deficiencies and malnutrition.

The IFSO Worldwide One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Survey: Techniques and Outcomes?

INTRODUCTION

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has become one of the most commonly performed gastric bypass procedures in some countries.

OBJECTIVES

To assess how surgeons viewed the OAGB, perceptions, indications, techniques, and outcomes, as well as the incidence of short- and long-term complications and how they were managed worldwide.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to all IFSO members in all 5 chapters to study the pattern of practice and outcomes of OAGB.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and forty-two surgeons responded. The most commonly performed procedures were sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and OAGB. Preoperatively, 70% of the surgeons performed endoscopy routinely. In regards to weight loss, 83% (570 surgeons) responded that OAGB produces better weight loss than SG, and 49% (342 surgeons) responded that OAGB produces better weight loss than RYGB. The most common length of the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) utilized was 200 cm. Sixty-seven percent of surgeons did not measure the total length of the small bowel. In patients with reflux disease and history of smoking, 53% and 22% of surgeons respectively still offered OAGB as a treatment option. Postoperatively, leak was documented in 963 patients, and it was the leading cause for mortality. Leak management was conservative in 35%. Conversion to RYGB was performed in 31%. In 16% the anastomosis was reinforced, 6% of the patients were reversed, and other procedures were performed in 12%. Revision of OAGB for malnutrition/steatorrhea or severe bile reflux was reported at least once by 37% and 45% of surgeons, respectively (200 cm was the most commonly encountered biliopancreatic limb BPL in those revised for malnutrition). Most common strategy for revision was conversion to RYGB (43%), reversal to normal anatomy (32%), shortening of the BPL (20%), and conversion to SG (5%). Nevertheless, 5 out of 98 mortalities (5%) were due to liver failure/malnutrition.

CONCLUSION

There are infrequent but potentially severe specific complications including malnutrition, liver failure, and bile reflux that may require surgical correction after OAGB.

One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with fixed bypass of the proximal two meters versus tailored bypass of the proximal one-third of small bowel: short-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is an effective bariatric procedure that confers satisfactory weight loss and improvement in comorbidities. The present study aimed to compare OAGB with fixed bypass of the proximal 200 cm of small bowel and tailored bypass of the proximal 1/3 of bowel.

METHODS

Patients with class II/III obesity underwent OAGB with either fixed bypass of the proximal two meters or tailored bypass of the proximal 1/3 of bowel. The main outcomes of the study were weight loss, improvement in comorbidities, complications, and changes in nutritional parameters after each technique.

RESULTS

The present study included 80 patients (62 female) of a mean age of 41 years and mean body mass index (BMI) of 50.9 kg/m². The tailored bypass group was followed by a significantly lower BMI and significantly higher excess weight loss and total weight loss at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of improvement in comorbidities. The fixed bypass group was associated with a significantly higher complication rate than the tailored bypass group (22.5 vs. 5%, P = 0.04). Both groups were associated with similar changes in the nutritional parameters at 12 months postoperatively, except for the higher serum albumin levels after the tailored bypass than the fixed bypass.

CONCLUSIONS

OAGB with tailored bypass of the proximal one-third of bowel was associated with greater weight loss and comparable improvement in comorbidities as compared to fixed bypass of the proximal two meters of intestine.

The Hardship of Recovering a Patient from Liver Failure after One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass

BACKGROUND

The one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) was first described in 2001 as a safe and effective procedure that meets the criteria for the "ideal" weight loss operation. However, revisions for malnutrition and liver failure were reported.

CASE REPORT

We report a patient who was transferred to our institution with protein calorie malnutrition and liver failure after undergoing OAGB.

METHODS

A 42-year-old morbidly obese female patient underwent a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in 2012 followed by conversion to OAGB in 2018 for weight regain at another institution. Nine months after conversion, she was transferred to our institution with dehydration, vomiting, dysphagia, generalized edema, and steatorrhea (7 times/day). She had become wheelchair bound. On examination, there was gross edema, protein-calorie malnutrition, dermatitis, and muscle wasting. She had anemia (8 g/dl) reference range (11.5-15.5 g/dl), bilirubin (1.8 mg/dl) (0.2-1.2 mg/dl), hypoalbuminemia (1.4 g/dl) (3.5-5 g/dl), and elevated international normalized ratio (INR). The patient was admitted to the hospital and was started on total parenteral nutrition (TPN), with thiamine, vitamins, iron injections, and trace mineral replacement. Her course was complicated by multiple episodes of line sepsis and bacteremia. After 6 weeks, we succeeded in raising her albumin to 2.9 g/dl and proceeded with surgery.

TECHNIQUE

Laparoscopic exploration started with identifying the anatomy and measuring the biliopancreatic limb (BPL = 430 cm) and the common channel (CC = 380 cm). First, we restored the continuity of the small bowel. Then the long gastric pouch was trimmed. Finally, the patient was converted to a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with a 30 cm BP limb and 70 cm Roux limb. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged home on the fourth postoperative day. At 3 months of follow-up, her symptoms resolved, her laboratory work up normalized, and she regained mobility.

CONCLUSION

Malnutrition and liver failure after OAGB are not uncommon. It is encountered with configurations of longer BP limb. BPL length of 150 to 200 cm seems to reduce such complications. Preoperative nutritional optimization is key. Conversion to a proximal RYGB is a safe and feasible approach.

Omega Loop Gastroileal Bypass (OLGIBP/SAGI) Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB): Medium-Term Results

INTRODUCTION

In bariatric surgery, new surgical techniques are continually being developed. The one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has become increasingly common since 2001. However, some patients experience bile reflux or excessive weight loss. This study aimed to assess a new bariatric procedure designed to avoid some of the drawbacks of conventional OAGB.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

To lower the complication rate and pathophysiological impact after OAGB, we performed an omega loop gastroileal bypass (OLGIBP/SAGI) with a 300-cm common limb. We compared this technique with OAGB.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients underwent OLGIBP and 23 underwent OAGB. Mean operative time was 108 min for OLGIBP vs 103 min for OAGB. The mean hospital length of stay was 3 days (1 to 7). No complications related to the gastroenterostomy occurred. At 3 years, among OAGB patients, there were 5 (21.7%) cases of bile reflux including 2 (8.7%) requiring a revision to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Among OLGIBP patients, there were 3 (17.6%) cases of bile reflux 1 (5.9%) requiring a revision to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. There was no albumin deficiency. At 3 years, % of total weight loss (TWL) was 43.6 + - 6.2 in the OAGB group vs 48.2 + - 7.4 in the OLGIBP group.

CONCLUSIONS

The bariatric and metabolic outcomes of OLGIBP are expected to be similar to those of OAGB. The OLGIBP technique should reduce the risks of malnutrition and bile reflux. The two techniques can be safely performed and offer alternatives in bariatric surgery.

Revisional One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Restrictive Index Surgery-a Metaanalysis and Comparison with Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

BACKGROUND

One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) was established as a recognized bariatric procedure in the 2018 International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO) position statement. This study evaluates the outcomes of revisional OAGB (rOAGB) after a restrictive index procedure, and to compare it to revisional RYGB (rRYGB).

METHODS

A literature search was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines on papers published from inception till February 2020. Original studies involving patients who underwent rOAGB after a primary failed restrictive procedure were included. The primary outcome measured was postrOAGB weight loss. Secondary outcome measures include comorbidity resolution, operative duration, length of stay, morbidity, and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies with 1377 patients were included. Five studies compared rOAGB versus rRYGB. Majority of the patients (76%) were female, with mean age of 43.5 years old. Mean body mass index (BMI) before revisional surgery was 41.6 kg/m². The most common biliopancreatic limb length was 200 cm. Percentage of excess weight loss after rOAGB increases to a maximum of 76.0% at 48 months postsurgery. rOAGB resulted in a pooled prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and obstructive sleep apnea resolution of 74.9%, 48.4%, 63.2%, and 75.7% respectively. When compared to rRYGB, rOAGB demonstrated greater weight loss, comparable metabolic syndrome resolution, but with a shorter operating time. Morbidity and mortality rates were low across all studies.

CONCLUSIONS

rOAGB has potential as an alternative revisional surgery, with weight loss profiles and rates of metabolic syndrome resolution that are comparable to rRYGB.