Standardization of Bariatric Metabolic Procedures: World Consensus Meeting Statement

Development and Evaluation of a Quality Assessment Tool for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos: A Review and Comparison of Academic and Online Video Resources

BACKGROUND

Video recording of surgical procedures is increasing in popularity. They are presented in various platforms, many of which are not peer-reviewed. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) videos are widely available; however, there is limited evidence supporting the use of reporting guidelines when uploading LSG videos to create a valuable educational video. We aimed to determine the variations and establish the quality of published LSG videos, in both peer-reviewed literature and on YouTube, using a newly designed checklist to improve the quality and enhance the transparency of video reporting.

METHODS

A quality assessment tool was designed by using existing research and society guidelines, such as the Bariatric Metabolic Surgery Standardization (BMSS). A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines was performed on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify video case reports (academic videos) and a similar search was performed on the commercial YouTube platform (commercial videos) simultaneously. All videos displaying LSG were reviewed and scored using the quality assessment tool. Academic and commercial videos were subsequently compared and an evidence-based checklist was created.

RESULTS

A total of 93 LSG recordings including 26 academic and 67 commercial videos were reviewed. Mean score of the checklist was 5/11 and 4/11 for videos published in articles and YouTube, respectively. Academic videos had higher rates of describing instruments used, such as orogastric tube (P < 0.001) and stapler information (P = 0.04). Fifty-four percent of academic videos described short-term patient outcomes, while not reported in commercial videos (P < 0.001). Sleeve resection status was not universally reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Videos published in the academic literature are describing steps in greater detail with more emphasis on specific technical elements and patient outcomes and thus have a higher educational value. A new quality assessment tool has been proposed for video reporting guidelines to improve the reliability and value of published video research.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Lacks Intrasurgeon and Intersurgeon Agreement in Technical Key Points That May Affect Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After the Procedure

PURPOSE

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) may be related to surgical technique. The fact that there is a lack of technical standardization may explain large differences in GERD incidence. The aim of this study is to evaluate auto- and hetero-agreement for SG technical key points based on recorded videos.

METHODS

Ten experienced (minimum of 5 years performing bariatric surgery, minimum of 30 SG per year) bariatric surgeons (9 (90%) males) were selected. Participants were invited to send an unedited video with a typical laparoscopic SG (first round of the Delphi process). Videos were cropped into small clips comprising 11 key points of the technique. All anonymized clips (including their own) were returned to all surgeons. Individuals were asked to agree or not with the technique demonstrated (second round). The percentage of agreement was presented to the entire group that was asked for a second vote (third round).

RESULTS

Agreement was poor/fair for all points except hiatal repair that had a very good agreement in the second round. For the third round, there was a slight increase in agreement for distance esophagogastric junction/proximal stapling and gastric mobilization for stapling and a slight decrease in agreement for gastric tube final shape. Only 1 (10%) surgeon recognized that he evaluated his own video. Five (50%) surgeons disagreed with themselves on 1 or more points.

CONCLUSION

SG lacks intrasurgeon and intersurgeon agreement in technical key points that may justify significant differences in GERD incidence after the procedure.

One Anastomosis Transit Bipartition (OATB): Rational and Mid-term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The "One-anastomosis transit bipartition" (OATB) is a promising emerging technique in the metabolic syndrome treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the results achieved with OATB in the first 5 years after surgery.

METHOD

Cross-sectional, retrospective study, with individuals undergoing primary OATB. Individuals included in the study were: ≥ 18 years, BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2; and excluded smoking habits, drug dependence, inflammatory bowel diseases. The data analyzed demographic, anthropometric, surgical, clinical, and nutritional.

RESULTS

Sixty eight participants, 75% women, average age 45.5 years and BMI 41 kg/m2. Associated diseases: osteoarthritis (52.9%), hypertension (48.5%) and type 2 diabetes mellitus-T2DM (39.7%). All underwent laparoscopy, without conversions. Average operative time is 122.6 ± 31.7 min, and hospital stay is 2.2 ± 0.8 days. The common channel length 27 and 41 patients with 250 cm and 300 cm respectively. We registered no intraoperative complications, 2 (2.9%) early complications, and 14 (20.6%) late complications. In the first 6 months, 94.7% (250 cm) and 88.9% (300 cm) of the patients no longer used medication for T2DM, with no statistical difference between the two groups. The incidence of nutritional disorders at any time during follow-up: hypovitaminosis D (14.7%), folate hypovitaminosis (14.7%), elevated PTH (7.4%), hypoproteinemia (5.9%) and anemia (5.9%). We found no statistically significant difference between 250 and 300 cm common channel groups.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that OATB is a safe and effective technique, demonstrating good control of T2DM and metabolic syndrome. There is a requirement to treat previous nutritional deficits. We need more long-term evidence and comparison to other surgical techniques.

The Sleeve Gastrectomy with Jejunal Bypass (Original Technique)

Introduction: Sleeve gastrectomy with jejunal bypass (SGJB) has been used as a bariatric/metabolic procedure since 2003, in the search for a simpler than other standard techniques and as effective as them. The jejunal-ileal anastomosis can deliver food directly to the hindgut where incretins are secreted. This procedure has gained popularity around the globe and has been studied in rat models as in humans, especially in South America and Asia. In this review, we present the details of the original surgical technique SGJB, summarized all the publications of the procedure, discuss possible advantages and disadvantages, and provide scientific information to look for the real place between bariatric/metabolic procedures. Methods: With 20 years of experience performing the original SGJB, the authors present the details of the procedure. Results: The SGJB consists of a traditional sleeve with the addition of a jejunal bypass. The jejunum is transected 20-30 cm distally to the ligament of Treitz. Then, the biliopancreatic limb is anastomosed to restore transit 250-300 cm distal to the jejunum transection. This way, the ileum gets in contact with partially digested food with the subsequent production of incretins. Conclusion: In this article, we describe the original Alamo technique of SGJB. It is important to clarify the technical details since many publications have presented different lengths of the defunctionalized jejunal limb. Also, the SGJB has been categorized in the "sleeve plus" procedures and its promising outcomes should rapidly position it as an alternative metabolic surgery.

[Results of the first All-Russian consensus conference on bariatric surgery]

Until now, there has not been organized consensus for standardization in bariatric surgery In Russia. We present the results of the first Bariatric Surgery Consensus Conference conducted in Barnaul (March, 2023). A list of questions was proposed within 6 blocks: 1) general issues of bariatric surgery, 2) sleeve gastrectomy, 3) one-anastomosis gastric bypass («mini-gastric bypass»), 4) Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass, 5) Single Anastomosis Duodenal Switch and other options for biliopancreatic bypass, 6) rare procedures. Consensus (>70% agreement) was reached for 51 out of 96 statements. Stratification by the level of expertise was carried out, and responses of the expert group were compared with responses of all participants.

Comparison of various prediction models in the effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on type 2 diabetes in the Chinese population 5 years after surgery

BACKGROUND

Various prediction models of type 2 diabetes (T2D) remission have been externally verified internationally. However, long-term validated results after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery are lacking. The best model for the Chinese population is also unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the prediction effect of various prediction models on the long-term diabetes remission after RYGB in the Chinese population and to provide reference for clinical use.

SETTING

A retrospective clinical study at a university hospital.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed Chinese population data 5 years after RYGB and externally validated 11 predictive models to evaluate the predictive effect of each model on long-term T2D remission after RYGB.

RESULTS

We enrolled 84 patients. The mean body mass index was 41 kg/m2, and the percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was 72.3%. The mean glycated hemoglobin level was 8.4% preoperatively and decreased to 5.9% after 5 years. The 5-year postoperative complete and partial remission rates of T2D were 31% and 70.2%, respectively. The ABCD scoring model (sensitivity, 84%; specificity, 76%; area under the curve [AUC], .866) and the Panuzi et al. [34] study (sensitivity, 84%; specificity, 81%; AUC, .842) showed excellent results. In the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, calibration values for ABCD and Panuzi et al. [34] were .14 and .21, respectively. The predicted-to-observed ratios of ABCD and Panuzi et al. [34] were .83 and .88, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

T2D was relieved to varying degrees 5 years after RYGB in patients with obesity. The prediction models in ABCD and the Panuzi et al. [34] studies showed the best prediction effects. ABCD was recommended for clinical use because of excellent predictive performance, good statistical test results, and simple and practical design features.

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in 6722 Patients: Early Outcomes from a Private Hospital Registry

BACKGROUND

One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is an emerging metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) type used in both primary OAGB (pOAGB) and revisional OAGB (rOAGB). We studied ≤30-day outcomes of pOAGB and rOAGB and identified predictors of early complications.

METHODS

Electronic medical records of all OAGBs performed between January 2017 and December 2021 at a high-volume bariatric clinic in Israel comprising four hospital centers were scanned retrospectively using specialized data software (MDClone software, version 6.1). Data gathered were patients' characteristics, surgical procedure, and ≤30-day complications with Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors related to early complications of pOAGB and rOAGB.

RESULTS

A total of 6722 patients underwent a pOAGB (n = 5088, 75.7%) or rOAGB (n = 1634, 24.3%) procedure at our institution. Preoperative mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 40.6 ± 11.5 years and 41.2 ± 4.6 kg/m2, respectively. Early complications occurred in 258 (3.8%) patients (176 pOAGB and 82 rOAGB) and included mainly bleeding (n = 133, 2.0%), leaks (n = 31, 0.5%), and obstruction/strictures (n = 19, 0.3%). CDC complications for grades 1-2 and grades 3a--5 were 1.5% and 1.6%, respectively. The overall mortality rate was 0.03% (n = 2). Age, operative time ≥3 h, and any additional concomitant procedure were independent predictors of early complications following pOAGB, while a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and operative time ≥3 h were independent predictors of early complications following rOAGB.

CONCLUSIONS

OAGB was found to be a safe primary and revisional MBS procedure in the ≤30-postoperative day term. The most common complications were gastrointestinal bleeding, leaks, and obstruction/stricture.

Is one-anastomosis gastric bypass a good revisional bariatric surgery? A single-center retrospective cohort study

<b><br>Introduction:</b> The rate of revisional surgeries following sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has increased. One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) appears to have multiple advantages as a primary bariatric procedure. OAGB as revisional surgery is still being investigated.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of OAGB performed as a post-SG revisional surgery.</br> <b><br>Materials and methods:</b> A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted using a routinely collected database of adults undergoing revisional OAGB after SG. A survey of patients was conducted, obtaining information on changes in body weight and improvement in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and obesity-related diseases.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> The study group included 74 patients: 59 women (80%) and 15 men, mean age of 41.61 9.21 years. The most common indication for OAGB was weight regain. The follow-up was up to 7 years, the mean time was 3.58 1.21 years. The mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 40.38 6.15. All patients experienced significant weight loss, reaching a BMI of 33.61 (27.28- 37.13) at the last observation. After surgery, 35% of patients achieved successful weight loss and 48% of patients achieved remission or improvement of GERD.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> Revisional OAGB seems to be a good alternative after a failed SG in terms of obesity-related disease recurrence, not of weight regain. Long-term follow-up revealed that only a third of patients achieved successful weight loss. When proposing revisional OAGB, the risk of complications - mainly anemia and the possibility of de novo GERD should be considered.</br>.

Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in Patients Older than 65 Years - a Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

With the increase in life expectancy and a growing number of people suffering from obesity, bariatric and metabolic surgery is becoming a major concern in the elderly population. The study aimed to collect, systematize and present the available data on the surgical treatment of obesity among Polish patients over 65 years of age.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study analysed patients over 65 years who underwent laparoscopic bariatric procedures in Poland from 2008 to 2022. The efficacy endpoints were percentage of excess weight loss (EWL%), percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), improvement in obesity-related diseases.

RESULTS

The group consisted of 284 patients (173 women, 60.9%). The mean follow-up was 47.5 months. The mean BMI before surgery was 43.1 kg/m2. 146 (51.4%) patients had T2D, and 244 (85.9%) had HT. The most common procedure was sleeve gastrectomy (82.0%). The mean EWL% after surgery was 50.9%, and the mean TWL% after surgery was 20.6%. There was the statistically significant difference between AGB vs OAGB, SG vs OAGB in %EWL (p = 0.0116, p = 0.009, respectively) and RYGB vs OAGB in %TWL (p = 0.0291). After surgery, 93 patients (63.7%) had complete or partial remission of T2D, and 112 patients (45.9%) had complete or partial remission of HT.

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery appears to be a safe and effective method of treatment of obesity in patients over 65 years of age. OAGB seems to have better results in weight loss than SG, RYGB, and AGB in older patients.

BRAZILIAN MULTI-SOCIETY POSITION STATEMENT ON EMERGING BARIATRIC AND METABOLIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES

This Brazilian multi-society position statement on emerging bariatric and metabolic surgical procedures was issued by the Brazilian Society of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery (SBCBM), the Brazilian College of Digestive Surgery (CBCD), and the Brazilian College of Surgeons (CBC). This document is the result of a Brazilian Emerging Surgeries Forum aimed at evaluating the results of surgeries that are not yet listed in the Federal Council of Medicine (CFM), the regulatory agency that oversees and regulates medical practice in Brazil. The Forum integrated more than 400 specialists and academics with extensive knowledge about bariatric and metabolic surgery, representing the three surgical societies: SBCBM, CBC, and CBCD. International speakers participated online and presented their experiences with the techniques under discussion, emphasizing the regulatory policies in their countries. The indications for surgery and the subsequent procedures were carefully reviewed, including one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), single anastomosis duodeno-ileal with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S or OADS), sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (SGTB), and sleeve gastrectomy with ileal interposition (SGII). The recommendations of this document are based on an extensive literature review and discussions among bariatric surgery specialists from the three surgical societies. We concluded that patients with a body mass index over 30 kg/m2 may be candidates for metabolic surgery in the presence of comorbidities (arterial hypertension and type 2 diabetes) with no response to clinical treatment of obesity or in the control of other associated diseases. Regarding the surgical procedures, we concluded that OAGB, OADS, and SGTB are associated with low morbidity rates, satisfactory weight loss, and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities such as diabetes and arterial hypertension. SGII was considered a good and viable promising surgical alternative technique. The recommendations of this statement aim to synchronize our societies with the sentiments and understandings of most of our members and also serve as a guide for future decisions regarding bariatric surgical procedures in our country and worldwide.

[Anastomotic techniques in minimally invasive bariatric surgery]

BACKGROUND

Recommendations for the use of specific anastomotic techniques are not available in laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Recommendation criteria should consider the rate of insufficiency, bleeding, tendency to stricture or ulceration as well as the impact on weight loss or dumping.

OBJECTIVE

This article gives a review of the available evidence on the anastomotic techniques of typical surgical procedures in laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The current literature was reviewed and is discussed regarding anastomotic techniques for Roux-en‑Y gastric bypass (RYGB), one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS).

RESULTS

Few comparative studies exist, except for the RYGB. In RYGB gastrojejunostomy, a complete manual suture was shown to be equivalent to a mechanical anastomosis. In addition, the linear staple suture showed slight advantages over the circular stapler in terms of wound infections and bleeding. The anastomosis technique of the OAGB and SASI can be performed entirely with a linear stapler or with suture closure of the anterior wall defect. There seems to be an advantage of manual anastomosis in BPD-DS.

CONCLUSION

Due to the lack of evidence, no recommendations can be made. Only in RYGB was there an advantage of the linear stapler technique with hand closure of the stapler defect compared to the linear stapler. In principle, prospective, randomized studies should be strived for.

Comparison of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Remission Using International Criteria

Introduction: Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass procedure is recommended in the treatment of patients with obesity, who have comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Meanwhile, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the most preferred contemporary bariatric procedure. Research comparing these two techniques are scarce in the literature. In this study, we aimed to compare LSG and SASI procedures in terms of weight loss and diabetes remission. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients, who underwent LSG and 31 patients, who underwent SASI, with a body mass index (BMI) of 35 and above, and under unsuccessful medical treatment, in terms of T2DM, were included in the study. Patients' demographic data were recorded. Oral antidiabetic drugs and insulin use, HbA1c and fasting blood glucose values, and BMI values were recorded preoperatively, at thd sixth month and at first year. According to these data, patients were compared in terms of primarily diabetes remission and secondarily weight loss. Results: At the sixth month and first year, the mean excess weight loss (EWL) values of the SASI group were 55.2% ± 12.45% and 71.67% ± 15.75%, respectively, while EWL values of the LSG group were 57.41% ± 16.22% and 69.73% ± 16.65%, respectively (P > .05). T2DM evaluations revealed that in the SASI group, 25 (80.65%) patients at the sixth month and 26 (83.87%) patients at the first year had either clinical improvement or remission, whereas 23 (76.67%) patients at the sixth month and 26 (86,67%) patients at the first year in the LSG group had the same outcomes (P > .05). Conclusion: The short-term comparison of LSG and SASI procedures revealed similar results in terms of weight loss and T2DM remission. Hence, LSG can be considered as the first-step treatment of morbid obesity accompanied by T2DM, since it is a simpler surgical procedure.

Safety and Effect of Bariatric Metabolic Surgeries for Psychiatric Patients with Obesity: A Retrospective Matched Case-control Trial

INTRODUCTION

Patients living with psychiatric illnesses (PIs) have a high prevalence of obesity. In a 2006 survey, 91.2% of professionals in the bariatric field identified "psychiatric issues" as clear contraindications to weight-loss surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective matched case-control study investigated the impact, safety, and possible relapse after bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) in patients with PIs. Also, we tested the incidence of patients who developed PI after BMS and compared the post-procedural weight loss with that in a matched control group without PIs. The cases were matched in a ratio of 1:4 to the control patients standardized for age, sex, preoperative BMI, and type of BMS.

RESULTS

Of 5987 patients, 2.82% had a preoperative PI; postoperative de novo PI was present in 0.45%. Postoperative BMI was significantly different between the groups when compared to preoperative BMI (p < 0.001). Percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) after six months was not significantly different between the case (24.6% ± 8.9) and control groups (24.0% ± 8.4, p = 1.000). Early and late complications were not significantly different between the groups. The psychiatric drug use and dosage changes did not differ significantly pre- and postoperatively. Of the psychiatric patients, 5.1% were postoperatively admitted to a psychiatric hospital (p = 0.06) unrelated to BMS, and 3.4% had a prolonged absence from work after surgery.

CONCLUSION

BMS is an effective weight loss treatment and a safe procedure for patients with psychiatric disorders. We found no change in the patients' psychiatric status outside the usual disease course. Postoperative de novo PI was rare in the present study. Furthermore, patients with severe psychiatric illness were excluded from undergoing surgery and, therefore, from the study. Careful follow-up is necessary to guide and protect patients with PI.

Medium Term Outcomes of Revision Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy after Gastric Banding: A Propensity Score Matched Study

PURPOSE

Revision bariatric surgery may be undertaken after weight loss failure and/or complications following primary bariatric surgery. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of revision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (RLSG) after gastric banding (GB) to those of primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (PLSG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective, propensity-score matched study was conducted to compare between PLSG (control) patients and RLSG after GB (treatment) patients. Patients were matched using 2:1 nearest neighbor propensity score matching without replacement. Patients were compared on weight loss outcomes and postoperative complications for up to five years.

RESULTS

144 PLSG patients were compared against 72 RLSG patients. At 36 months, PLSG patients had significantly higher mean %TWL than RLSG patients (27.4 ± 8.6 [9.3-48.9]% vs. 17.9 ± 10.2 [1.7-36.3]%, p < 0.01). At 60 months, both groups had similar mean %TWL (16.6 ± 8.1 [4.6-31.3]% vs. 16.2 ± 6.0 [8.8-22.4)]%, p > 0.05). Early functional complication rates were slightly higher with PLSG (13.9% vs. 9.7%), but late functional complication rates were comparatively higher with RLSG (50.0% vs. 37.5%). The differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Both early (0.7% vs 4.2%) and late (3.5% vs 8.3%) surgical complication rates were lower in PLSG patients compared to RLSG patients but did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

RLSG after GB has poorer weight loss outcomes than PLSG in the short-term. Although RLSG may carry higher risks of functional complications, the safety of RLSG and PLSG are overall comparable.

Side-to-side magnet anastomosis system duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy: early multi-center results

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal anastomoses with classical sutures and/or metal staples have resulted in significant bleeding and leak rates. This multi-site study evaluated the feasibility, safety, and preliminary effectiveness of a novel linear magnetic compression anastomosis device, the Magnet System (MS), to form a side-to-side duodeno-ileostomy (DI) diversion for weight loss and type 2 diabetes (T2D) resolution.

METHODS

In patients with class II and III obesity (body mass index [BMI, kg/m²] ≥ 35.0- ≤ 50.0 with/without T2D [HbA1C > 6.5%]), two linear MS magnets were delivered endoscopically to the duodenum and ileum with laparoscopic assistance and aligned, initiating DI; sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was added. There were no bowel incisions or retained sutures/staples. Fused magnets were expelled naturally. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC).

RESULTS

Between November 22, 2021 and July 18, 2022, 24 patients (83.3% female, mean ± SEM weight 121.9 ± 3.3 kg, BMI 44.4 ± 0.8) in three centers underwent magnetic DI. Magnets were expelled at a median 48.5 days. Respective mean BMI, total weight loss, and excess weight loss at 6 months (n = 24): 32.0 ± 0.8, 28.1 ± 1.0%, and 66.2 ± 3.4%; at 12 months (n = 5), 29.3 ± 1.5, 34.0 ± 1.4%, and 80.2 ± 6.6%. Group mean respective mean HbA1_C and glucose levels dropped to 1.1 ± 0.4% and 24.8 ± 6.6 mg/dL (6 months); 2.0 ± 1.1% and 53.8 ± 6.3 mg/dL (12 months). There were 0 device-related AEs, 3 procedure-related serious AEs. No anastomotic bleeding, leakage, stricture, or mortality.

CONCLUSION

In a multi-center study, side-to-side Magnet System duodeno-ileostomy with SG in adults with class III obesity appeared feasible, safe, and effective for weight loss and T2D resolution in the short term.

Global trends in BMS research using publication as a surrogate marker: A 30 year review

Obesity is a global pandemic with increasing prevalence and long-term negative health outcomes. Bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) is the most effective treatment option for achieving long-term weight loss. A systematic search was performed from 1990 to 2020 of BMS procedures using standardised groups. Data were collected on operation type reported, country and continent of publication. North America and Europe were the leading contributors to global publications in BMS, producing 41.3 % (n = 4931) and 37.1 % (n = 4436) of publications respectively, with increasing publications from Asia. Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) were the most studied procedure types with number of publications continuing to increase over time. A plateau and downward trend was seen for Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band (LAGB) publication from 2015 to 2019. An increase in emerging/experimental techniques over the past decade is observed.

Revisional bariatric surgery after adjustable gastric band: a multicenter Polish Revision Obesity Surgery Study (PROSS)

BACKGROUND

Adjustable gastric band (AGB) hadbeen the preferred treatment for morbid obesity because it is minimally invasive and reversible. But now it seems to be slowly becoming a historic procedure due to the disappointing effects. The aim of the study was to systematize and present the available data on revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) after AGB among Polish patients.

METHODS

It is a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic RBS after AGB in 12 Polish bariatric centers. The database included patient demographics, comorbidities and surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

The group consisted of 234 patients who underwent AGB, which accounted for 29% of revisional cases recorded in the Polish Revisional Obesity Surgery Study (PROSS). 195 were women (83%), and 39 were men (17%). One hundred seventy-five patients after AGB experienced a weight regain (74.5%), 36 patients a gastric band slippage (15.0%), 14 patients had gastric band intolerance (6.0%). Types of RBS included 116 sleeve gastrectomies (SG) (49.4%), 86 Roux-en Y gastric by-passes (RYGB) (36.6%), 20 one anastomosis gastric by-passes (OAGB) (8,5%). The highest weight loss expressed as %EBMIL was observed after OAGB (63.5 ± 32.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The main indication for RBS after AGB was weight regain. SG was the most frequently chosen type of RBS after AGB. RBS after AGB leads to weight loss and improvement in type 2 diabetes and hypertension with an acceptable low risk of complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05108532.

Weight Regain in the Second Year after Sleeve Gastrectomy Could Be a Predictor of Long-Term Outcomes?

Background and Objectives: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is an effective surgical procedure in the treatment of obesity. However, a significant percentage of patients suffer from weight regain over long-term follow-up. The mechanisms responsible for this process are still poorly understood. The aim of the study is to evaluate the predictive effect of weight regain in the second year after SG on long-term bariatric surgery effectiveness. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the database of routinely collected information about patients undergoing SG in the Department of General, Minimally Invasive and Elderly Surgery in Olsztyn. Patients were divided into two groups according to the change in body weight between the first and second years after the surgery: weight gainers (WG) and weight maintainers (WM). Results: A study group consisting of 206 patients, with follow-up over 5 years, was included in the study. The WG group consisted of 69 patients while the WM group had 137 patients. There were no significant differences between the patient characteristics (p > 0.05). The WM group had a mean %EWL of 7.45% (SD, 15.83%) and %TWL of 3.74 (SD, 8.43). The WG group had a mean %EWL of 22.78% (SD, 17.11%) and %TWL of 11.29% (SD, 8.68). The difference between the groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The study showed significantly better results in WM compared to WG (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Weight regain in the second year after SG may be a good factor for long-term bariatric surgery effectiveness prognosis.

[Current evidence on loop length in intestinal bypass procedures]

BACKGROUND

Intestinal bypass procedures are well recognized for their long-term weight reduction and control of metabolic comorbidities. The selection of the length of the small bowel loop has a significant influence on the positive and also negative effects of the chosen procedure but national and international standardization are missing.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to give an overview of the current evidence on the various intestinal bypass procedures and the influence of the chosen small bowel loop length on the desired and adverse postoperative outcomes. The IFSO 2019 consensus recommendations on the standardization of bariatric surgery and metabolic procedures form the basis of these considerations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The current literature was searched for comparative studies addressing the question of different small bowel loop lengths in a Roux-en‑Y gastric bypass, one anastomosis gastric bypass, single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy and biliopancreatic diversion (with duodenal switch).

RESULTS

Due to the heterogeneity of currently available studies and interindividual differences in total small bowel lengths in humans, it is difficult to give definitive recommendations for the choice of small bowel loop lengths. The longer the biliopancreatic loop (BPL) or the shorter the common channel (CC), the higher is the risk of (severe) malnutrition. To prevent malnutrition, the BPL should not be longer than 200 cm and the CC should have a length of at least 200 cm.

CONCLUSION

The intestinal bypass procedures recommended in the German S3 guidelines are safe and show good long-term outcomes. As part of the postbariatric follow-up, the nutritional status of patients following an intestinal bypass has to be followed-up on the long term in order to avoid malnutrition preferably prior to a clinical manifestation.

Revisional One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) for Poor Response of Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (DJB-SG) (Video Report)

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery has actually focused not only on obesity but also more on the improvements or remission of the metabolic diseases. Therefore, revisional surgery is indicated for patients with poor response to the primary bariatric surgery to control weight and obesity-associated medical conditions.

METHOD

In this video report, the patient was a 27-year-old Asian female with an initial BMI of 36.5 kg/m² and poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c: 11.9%). She underwent primary bariatric surgery of laparoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (DJB-SG) in June 2019. She had a nadir BMI of 28.8 kg/m² (corresponding body weight of 72 kg) in June 2020. However, she regained weight (BMI: 34 kg/m²) and had a relapse of diabetes with an HbA1c of 12.0% at the time of consultation for revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) in September 2022. After a multidisciplinary team evaluation, laparoscopic procedures of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with resizing the gastric tube, removal of duodenal-jejunal anastomosis, and lengthening of the biliopancreatic limb were performed.

RESULTS

The operative time was 186 min and blood loss was 50 ml. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was discharged on postoperative day 5. At the 3-month follow-up after RBS, the patient had lost 13 kg (weight dropped from 85 to 72 kg) and achieve remission of diabetes with HbA1c of 5.7%.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic OAGB is technically feasible and practical as a revisional procedure for poor response of DJB-SG.

Obesity surgery: Which procedure should we choose and why?

In the 70years that bariatric surgery has existed, many different surgical procedures have been developed. Four procedures are officially accepted by all learned societies: adjustable gastric banding (AGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and bilio-pancreatic diversion (BPD). Gastric banding has the lowest short-term surgical risk, but it has the highest re-operation rate. Compared to SG, RYGB presents about twice the risk of early complications. Late complications seem equivalent between the two procedures but studies with follow-up>10years are rarer for SG. SG has become the most commonly performed bariatric procedure worldwide, followed by RYGB, which is still the standard. BPD remains very marginal but the omega gastric bypass, an alternative technique that is still under evaluation, now competes with RYGB. The effectiveness of these different procedures on weight loss remains difficult to compare. SG and RYGB seem to be equivalent for weight loss results and remission of type-2 diabetes (T2DM). Their results are superior to AGB. Procedures that result in greater lengths of intestinal bypass (bilio-pancreatic diversion, omega bypass) seem to have a greater weight-loss effect but are burdened by more side effects. In conclusion, the choice of a procedure is conditioned firstly by the benefit-risk ratio and in relation to patient-related parameters, particularly the body mass index (BMI) and co-morbidities. Long-term results are also linked to factors other than surgery and in particular patient behavioral factors. Obesity is a chronic disease that indicates the need for real long-term medical and surgical management.

Management of Obesity and Obesity-Related Disorders: From Stem Cells and Epigenetics to Its Treatment

Obesity is a complex worldwide disease, characterized by an abnormal or excessive fat accumulation. The onset of this pathology is generally linked to a complex network of interactions among genetic and environmental factors, aging, lifestyle, and diets. During adipogenesis, several regulatory mechanisms and transcription factors are involved. As fat cells grow, adipose tissue becomes increasingly large and dysfunctional, losing its endocrine function, secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines, and recruiting infiltrating macrophages. This long-term low-grade systemic inflammation results in insulin resistance in peripheral tissues. In this review we describe the main mechanisms involved in adipogenesis, from a physiological condition to obesity. Current therapeutic strategies for the management of obesity and the related metabolic syndrome are also reported.

Bariatric surgery trends and progress in Taiwan: 2010-2021

INTRODUCTION

Taiwan is a leading country regarding bariatric surgery in Asia-Pacific. Since 2010, the Taiwan Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (TSMBS) has been accountable for the national evolution of bariatric surgery and inaugurated a national database accordingly. This study aimed to analyze the bariatric surgery trends and progress in Taiwan from 2010 to 2021.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The TSMBS database was collected on the basis of structured inquiries filled out by bariatric surgeons in Taiwan. All patients involving bariatric surgery were included. The data were stratified with the following objectives, including the types of bariatric procedures, demographic characteristics, and perioperative variables. A nationwide database was comprehensively analyzed and evaluated to determine the trends in the applications of the procedure.

RESULTS

Data of 30,026 patients were enrolled. A 2.5-fold increase was observed in bariatric procedures, from 1218 in 2010 to 3005 in 2021. Within 12 years, female accounts for 61.8 %. The revisional rate was 3.40 % during the exploration stage (2010-2013), 2.77 % during the maturity stage (2013-2018), and 5.10 % during the expansion stage (2019-2021). The top five of primary bariatric surgery is sleeve gastrectomy (SG, 63.05 %), gastric clipping surgery (GC, 11.17 %), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB, 9.34 %), one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB, 8.80 %), and sleeve plus surgery (SG plus, 4.43 %).

CONCLUSION

The trends and progress of Taiwan's bariatric surgery within recent decades are presented in this article. Taiwan's bariatric surgery case number has increased steadily from 2010 to 2021. Amongst all, SG has become the most dominant procedure since 2011 while OAGB takes up second place in 2020.

Efficacy and Safety of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity: a Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

The objective of this review is to systematically review the efficacy and safety outcomes of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). From inception to July 4, 2022, a systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized clinical trials comparing OAGB with RYGB in obesity. A meta-analysis performed using the RevMan 5.4.1 software evaluations was completed. We identified 1217 reports; after exclusions, eight trials with a total of 931 patients were eligible for analysis. Compared with RYGB, OAGB had multiple advantageous indexes. Examples include percent of excess weight loss (%EWL) at 12 months (P = 0.009), body mass index (BMI) at 2 years (P < 0.00001), early postoperative complication (P = 0.04), remission of dyslipidemia (P < 0.0001), and operative time (P < 0.00001). No significant statistical difference was observed in BMI at 6 months, %EWL at 6 months, BMI at 12 months, percent of excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL) at 2 years, BMI at 5 years, intraoperative complications, late postoperative complications, remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia or gastroesophageal reflux disease remission between OAGB and RYGB. OAGB is no less effective than RYGB; no significant differences in weight loss efficacy were observed, and more large and long-term randomized controlled trials are needed to verify this. In addition, studies have shown that OAGB has a shorter operation time, fewer early postoperative complications, and a shorter learning curve, making it easier for young surgeons to perform.

Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Critical Appraisal of the Role of Gastric Plication in Bariatric Surgery

Background and Objectives: This single-center study aimed to assess the role of laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP) in bariatric surgery. Materials and Methods: Using data from our institution’s prospectively maintained database, we identified adult patients with obesity who underwent either laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or LGCP between January 2012 and July 2017. In total, 280 patients were enrolled in this study. Results: The body mass index was higher in the LSG group than in the LGCP group (39.3 vs. 33.3, p < 0.001). Both groups achieved significant weight loss during the 3-year follow-up (p < 0.001). The weight-reduction rate was higher in the LSG group than in the LGCP group 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively (p = 0.001, 0.001, and 0.012, respectively). The reoperation rate of the LGCP group was higher than that of the LSG group (p = 0.001). No deaths were recorded in either group. Conclusions: Although both the LGCP and LSG groups achieved significant weight loss over three years, the LGCP group demonstrated a lower weight-reduction rate and a higher reoperation rate than the LSG group. Thus, it is necessary to reassess the role of LGCP in bariatric surgery, particularly when LSG is a feasible alternative.

A Practically Modified Approach with Complete Posterior Mobilization for Three-port Sleeve Gastrectomy: Single-center Experience

BACKGROUND

Although the procedure of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been standardized either in conventional lateral to medial or medial to lateral approach, surgeons occasionally face the challenge of poor visualization of the His angle and difficulty in complete posterior mobilization in limited surgical field. This study aimed to introduce our novel details of modified approach to address these issues.

METHODS

One hundred patients with obesity underwent modified approach- three-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Herein, we demonstrated our method to ease the procedure of gastric fundus mobilization with extensive posterior mobilization (shown in video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/SLE/A336). The demographic characteristics and perioperative data were reviewed.

RESULTS

There was no case of conversion to open surgery. The mean operative time, volume of blood loss, and hospital stay were 72.5±22.7 minutes, 11.6±10.5 mL, and 4.3±2.1 days, respectively. One postoperative leakage was observed and it was successfully treated with metallic covered stent. The percentage of total weight loss at 6 months and 1 year were 20.3±8.4 and 29.8±9.2, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience showed that the modified technique is feasible and may help surgeons to accomplish a complete posterior mobilization, and better address the poor visualization of the the His angle-site owing to the interposition of floating omentum or bulging part of the stomach.

Effectiveness of prophylactic doses of tranexamic acid in reducing hemorrhagic events in sleeve gastrectomy

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently the most common bariatric surgery in the world. Although it appears to be a safe treatment for obesity, it is still at risk of complications. The latest literature shows that postoperative bleeding occurs in 2-4% of cases, and up to 3% of cases requires reoperation for hemostasis. The aim of the study is to assess the effect of tranexamic acid (TXA) on hemorrhagic events and the reoperation rate in patients undergoing LSG.

METHODS

The study was designed as a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing LSG. We investigate the patients 6 months before and 6 months after introducing the prophylaxis doses of TXA into our bariatric protocol (non-TXA group vs TXA group).

RESULTS

Three hundred fourteen patients underwent LSG in a high-volume center from 2016 to 2017. After introducing TXA, a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of hemorrhage during surgery was observed (22.3% vs 10.8%, p = 0.006). There was a statistically significant reduction in the need for the staple line oversewing (10.2% vs 1.9%, p = 0.002). The mean operating time and the mean length of hospital stay were significantly higher in the non-TXA group than TXA group (63.1 vs 53.7 min, p < 000.1; 2.3 vs 2.1, p = 0.02). In both groups of patients, no venous thromboembolism or other complications occurred within 6 months after the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The prophylactic doses of TXA may be useful in reducing the hemorrhagic events during LSG. It may also shorten the length of hospital stay and the operating time.

One anastomosis gastric bypass with fundoplication of remnant stomach for weight regain prevention: Case report

INTRODUCTION

Weight regain is a serious issue after bariatric surgery. Using banding for one anastomotic gastric bypass prevents weight regain, but carries the risk of band erosion. The combination of bariatric procedures and fundoplication for patients without hiatal hernia probably prevents weight regain. However, no studies are demonstrating this.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 38-year-old woman who underwent laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with fundoplication of remnant stomach maintained a stable body weight after 5 years.

DISCUSSION

Owing to the complications associated with the conventional methods, the combination treatment has several advantages such as prevention leak of suture line in the gastric pouch prevention.

CONCLUSION

The combination treatment could successfully prevent weight regain and thus, will be helpful in the better management of obesity.

Complications Rate Variability after Bariatric Surgery and the Importance of Standardization of a Reporting System

BACKGROUND

The rate of early (< 30 days) complications after bariatric surgery has been reported to be 0.4-27.4%. Although the incidence of serious adverse events has decreased with time and experience, controversy regarding how they are reported persists, and the current literature is heterogeneous.

METHODS

Data from patients, who underwent primary bariatric surgery (gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy) at a single institution between 2012 and 2018, were retrospectively reviewed. Any deviation from a "normal" postoperative course (< 30 days) was identified, and a comparative analysis of early complications according to five models was performed: modified Clavien-Dindo; Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS); Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence (BSCOE); American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS); and Li (major/minor).

RESULTS

A total of 788 patients (83.7% gastric bypass), of whom 8.8% deviated from a "normal" postoperative course, were included. After applying the five classifications, the results were as follows: Clavien-Dindo, 8.8%; LABS, 2.3%; BSCOE, 0.4%; ASMBS, 9.9%; and Li, 11.2%. The incidence of major/severe/adverse outcomes were as follows: Clavien-Dindo, 2.4%; LABS, 2.3%; BSCOE, 0.4%; ASMBS, 6.9%; and Li 9.2%. Minor complications were as follows: Clavien-Dindo, 6.5%; ASMBS, 3%; and Li, 2%. There was no mortality.

CONCLUSION

Germane heterogeneity was found in reporting of early complications after bariatric surgery. Incidence varied according to classification system applied, and Clavien-Dindo demonstrated accuracy as a reporting model. To avoid bias, standardized reporting should be mandatory, and a more stringent and homogeneous reporting system should be established.

Metabolomics in Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Research and the Potential of Deep Learning in Bridging the Gap

During the past several years, there has been a shift in terminology from bariatric surgery alone to bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS). More than a change in name, this signifies a paradigm shift that incorporates the metabolic effects of operations performed for weight loss and the amelioration of related medical problems. Metabolomics is a relatively novel concept in the field of bariatrics, with some consistent changes in metabolite concentrations before and after weight loss. However, the abundance of metabolites is not easy to handle. This is where artificial intelligence, and more specifically deep learning, would aid in revealing hidden relationships and would help the clinician in the decision-making process of patient selection in an individualized way.

Laparoscopic Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass with Follow-up of Weight Loss and Metabolic Impact

Background: Bariatric surgery has been an effective safe management for severe obesity. The newly developed single-anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass has shown efficacy as a functional as well as mechanical restrictive bariatric procedure, with a neuroendocrine modulation effect. SASI bypass is still an investigational procedure, hence, more evidence is needed till it is declared as a standard bariatric procedure by the IFSO. Aim of the study: The current work aimed to describe our experience regarding the technical steps, the efficacy and the short-term outcome of SASI bypass procedure in patients with severe obesity. Patients and methods: Forty seven patients with severe obesity underwent SASI bypass procedure. They were followed till 1 year postoperatively. The weight loss, comorbidities and laboratory changes were assessed. Results: Patients evaluation at the 1-year postoperative follow up revealed a mean %TWL of 37.55 ± 6.17 and a mean %EBWL of 76.21 ± 9.8. The remission rates of T2DM, hyperlipidemia and hypertension were 85.7%, 94.7% and 89.66%, respectively, with statistically high significant differences between the preoperative and 1-year postoperative comorbidities rate. Stepwise regression analysis demonstrated that only the preoperative HbA1C remained in the model predicting the %TWL, and the preoperative BMI was the remaining factor in the model predicting the %EBWL in the study patients. Conclusion: The present study adds a new evidence to the promising outcome of the newly introduced SASI bypass procedure. After one year, the study patients showed excellent weight loss and comorbidities remission together with acceptable major complication rates.

A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) is a simple variation of gastric bypass and has gained worldwide popularity with clinical outcomes similar to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for weight loss and management of comorbidities. However, biliary reflux to the esophagus negates the benefits of LOAGB. In addition, weight gain after LOAGB and after LRYGB is a major problem in bariatric surgery. The aim of this article is to describe the design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes of two methods of LOAGB: experimental method with wrapping versus standard method nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to prevent weight regain and biliary reflux after LOAGB.

METHODS

The study was designed as a single-center prospective, interventional, randomized controlled trial. Masking: None (open label). Allocation: randomized. Enrollment: 100 obese patients. The relevant ethics committee approved the trial protocol. The endpoints (body mass index, bile reflux in the esophagus, other reflux symptoms) will be assessed presurgery and postsurgery (12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively).

DISCUSSION

With its 3-year follow-up time, this RCT will provide important data on the impact of wrapping the fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to prevent weight regain and biliary reflux after LOAGB.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04834635 . Registered on 8 April 2021.

A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) is a simple variation of gastric bypass and has gained worldwide popularity with clinical outcomes similar to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for weight loss and management of comorbidities. However, biliary reflux to the esophagus negates the benefits of LOAGB. In addition, weight gain after LOAGB and after LRYGB is a major problem in bariatric surgery.

The aim of this article is to describe the design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes of two methods of LOAGB: experimental method with wrapping versus standard method nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to prevent weight regain and biliary reflux after LOAGB.

Methods

The study was designed as a single-center prospective, interventional, randomized controlled trial. Masking: None (open label). Allocation: randomized. Enrollment: 100 obese patients. The relevant ethics committee approved the trial protocol.

The endpoints (body mass index, bile reflux in the esophagus, other reflux symptoms) will be assessed presurgery and postsurgery (12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively).

Discussion

With its 3-year follow-up time, this RCT will provide important data on the impact of wrapping the fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to prevent weight regain and biliary reflux after LOAGB.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.govNCT04834635. Registered on 8 April 2021.

Medium-term complications in patients undergoing gastric bypass

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience in the clinical follow-up of patients undergoing a gastric bypass.

METHOD

Description of six cases under follow-up by our unit after undergoing a gastric bypass at another private centre.

RESULTS

The 6 patients presented complications, the most notable being the death of one patient due to severe malnutrition and the need for revision surgery in another for the same reason, destabilisation of type 1 diabetes mellitus in another patient and fat-soluble vitamin deficiency in all of them.

CONCLUSIONS

There are few publications that support the safety of gastric bypass as a treatment for obesity. In our experience, it is a technique associated with a high rate of serious complications. As it is a technique that is not yet standardised, we consider that these cases should be operated on in centres where there is a multidisciplinary team with expertise in the management of possible complications, with close follow-up by surgeons and endocrinologists.

Cardio-psycho-metabolic outcomes of bariatric surgery: design and baseline of the WAS trial

Obesity is a rapidly emerging health problem and an established risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Bariatric surgery profoundly reduces body weight and mitigates sequelae of obesity. The open, randomized controlled Würzburg Adipositas Studie (WAS) trial compares the effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) vs psychotherapy-supported lifestyle modification in morbidly obese patients. The co-primary endpoint addresses 1-year changes in cardiovascular function (peak VO2 during cardiopulmonary exercise testing) and the quality of life (QoL) (Short-Form-36 physical functioning scale). Prior to randomization, all included patients underwent a multimodal anti-obesity treatment for 6-12 months. Thereafter, the patients were randomized and followed through month 12 to collect the primary endpoints. Afterwards, patients in the lifestyle group could opt for surgery, and final visit was scheduled for all patients 24 months after randomization. Sample size calculation suggested to enroll 90 patients in order to arrive at minimally 22 patients per group evaluable for the primary endpoint. Secondary objectives were to quantify changes in body weight, left ventricular hypertrophy, systolic and diastolic function (by echocardiography and cardiac MRI), functional brain MRI, psychometric scales, and endothelial and metabolic function. WAS enrolled 93 patients (72 women, median age 38 years, BMI 47.5 kg/m2) exhibiting a relevantly compromised exercise capacity (median peakVO2 18.3 mL/min/kg) and the QoL (median physical functioning scale 50). WAS is the first randomized controlled trial focusing on the effects of RYGB on cardiovascular function beyond hypertension. In addition, it will provide a wealth of high-quality data on the cerebral, psychiatric, hepatic, and metabolic function in obese patients after RYGB.

One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Revision for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Long Versus Short Biliopancreatic Limb Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

PURPOSE

One-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) may be associated with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The nature of this GERD remains unclear. This complication can be treated either with an additional enteroenterostomy without shortening of gastric pouch (long biliopancreatic limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (L-BPL-RYGB)) or revision to conventional short biliopancreatic limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (S-BPL-RYGB). The objective of this study is to compare the aforementioned procedures in terms of efficacy on GERD symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis between October 2012 and June 2020.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients underwent OAGB revision to S-BPL-RYGB (n = 21) or L-BPL-RYGB (n = 31) secondary to GERD. Investigation with pH impedance prior to revision was performed in 15 patients showing biliary reflux (BR) in 7 (46.6%), acid reflux (AR) in 6 (40%), and no confirmation in 2. Patients with AR had a revision to S-BPL-RYGB, whereas patients with BR underwent L-BPL-RYGB. Among the patients without pH metry results (n = 37), S-BPL-RYGB was performed for associated disabling digestive disorders or nutritional deficiencies. GERD was treated in 68% of patients with L-BPL-RYGB versus 95% of patients after S-BPL-RYGB. Patients, whose decision for revisional procedure was based on the results of pH impedance testing, did not reveal refractory GERD.

CONCLUSION

L-BPL-RYGB seems appropriate in patients with BR, whereas conversion to S-BPL-RYGB should be preferred if AR is present.

Preoperative circulating peroxiredoxin 1 levels as a predictor of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease remission after laparoscopic bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with obesity and insulin resistance and can be improved after bariatric surgery. Circulating Peroxiredoxin 1 (Prdx1) protein was reported to regulate energy metabolism and inflammation. This study aimed to investigate the roles of serum prdx1 in NAFLD patients with obesity undergoing LSG and to develop a prognostic model to predict the remission of severe NAFLD.

METHODS

The data of 93 participants from a tertiary hospital were assessed. Before laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and three months after LSG, anthropometric parameters, laboratory biochemical data, and abdominal B-ultrasound results were collected, and their hepatic steatosis index (HSI) and triglyceride-glucose index (TyG) were calculated. A NAFLD improvement (NAFLD-I) nomogram prediction model was constructed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multiple regression, and its predictive ability was verified in a validation cohort.

RESULTS

The baseline Prdx1 (OR: 0.887, 95% CI: 0.816-0.963, p=0.004), preoperative TyG (OR: 8.207, 95% CI: 1.903-35.394, p=0.005) and HSI (OR: 0.861, 95% CI: 0.765-0.969, p=0.013) levels were independently associated with NAFLD-I at three months after LSG in NAFLD patients with obesity. In the primary and validation cohorts, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) of the developed nomogram model was 0.891 and 0.878, respectively. The preoperative circulating Prdx1 levels of NAFLD patients with obesity were significantly reduced after LSG (25.32 [18.99-30.88] vs. 23.34 [15.86-26.42], p=0.001). Prdx1 was related to obesity and hepatic steatosis based on correlation analysis.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram based on preoperative serum prdx1, HSI and TyG could be an effective tool for predicting remission of severe NAFLD after LSG.

COMPLICATIONS AND LATE FOLLOW-UP OF SCOPINARO’S SURGERY WITH GASTRIC PRESERVATION: 1570 PATIENTS OPERATED IN 20 YEARS

Scopinaro-type biliopancreatic diversion (BPD-S) and its variations are the surgeries that offer the best immediate results in weight loss and regain in the late follow-up. It has a high rate of immediate complications and demands control with frequent laboratory tests.

Comparison of the Long-term Outcomes of RYGB and OAGB as Conversion Procedures After Failed LSG - a Case-Control Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of RYGB and OAGB on patients after failed treatment of obesity by laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

STUDY DESIGN

A case-control study based on a prospectively maintained database of reoperated patients after failed LSG, which included 33 patients who underwent RYGB conversion and 47 patients who underwent OAGB conversion.

RESULT

The mean %EBWL after a 5-year follow-up for RYGBc vs OAGBc was 84.04% vs 72.95% (p = 0.2176), respectively. Complete long-term diabetes remission was observed significantly more frequently in the OAGBc than in the RYGBc group (97.3% vs 33%; p = 0.035). There were no other statistically significant differences in the remission rate of comorbidities between RYGBc and OAGBc: hypertension 30% vs 27.3% (p = 0.261), dyslipidemia 83.3% vs 59.1% (p = 0.277), OSAS 100% vs 60% (p = 0.639), and GERD 40% vs 71.4% (p > 0.99), respectively. 7 patients were newly diagnosed with GERD after OAGBc and none after RYGBc. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of complications between the OAGBc and RYGB groups. The Comprehensive Complication Index was 17.85 (± IQR 29.6) in the OAGBc group and 14.92 (± IQR 21.75) in the RYGBc group (p = 0.375).

CONCLUSION

The authors recognized complete long-term type 2 diabetes remission after conversion surgery as the most relevant difference, where the OAGB variety was found superior for its better efficacy. Any other statistically significant differences in the consequences after both conversion procedures used after the failure of LSG have not been stated. Both methods therefore can be considered to complete the initial treatment, considering the preferences and individual burdens of the patients.

Partial dehiscence of an intraoperative staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A case report

Introduction

Leakage along a staple line during sleeve gastrectomy is a serious complication. Mechanical causes are uncommon; however, they should be considered as sources of acute postoperative leaks. The presented case discusses an important intraoperative complication with an avoidable cause that could benefit practicing surgeons as well as residents in training programs.

Presentation of case

This case describes the mechanical failure of a stapler that was identified intraoperatively. The staple line was oversewn using a 3–0 V Lok suture. The methylene blue test was negative, and the patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery.

Discussion

While most leaks were attributed to ischemia of the upper third of the stomach, leaks occurring within the first three postoperative days have a different pathophysiology. This may involve mechanical complications (stapler failure), direct gastric tissue trauma from aggressive handling, or thermal injuries. In our case, the likely cause of the partial dehiscence was the proximity of the stapler to the bougie and an unnoticed small fold at the antrum.

Conclusion

Surgeons should avoid placing the stapler too close to the bougie. Furthermore, surgeons should ensure that the stomach is flat and there are no gastric folds that could lead to stapling failure.

•

Staple line dehiscence in sleeve gastrectomy is a serious complication.

•

We recommend separating the stapler and bougie and avoiding gastric wall folds.

•

Oversewing the staple line was sufficient to address dehiscence in this case.

Outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with and without antrectomy in severely obese subjects. Evidence from randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has been proven safe and effective in achieving weight loss. However, the distance from the pylorus where resection should begin has been debated.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic SG with antrum resection (AR) versus preservation (AP) for bariatric purposes by conducting a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT).

SETTING

Academic hospital, United States.

METHODS

PubMed and Cochrane Library were queried for RCTs from establishment to August 2020. The following key search terms were used: "sleeve gastrectomy" AND ("antrectomy" OR "antrum") AND ("randomized" OR "random"). The following data were extracted: author, publication year, country, sample size, follow-up duration, and clinical outcomes, including weight-related: excess weight loss (EWL), total weight loss (TWL), body mass index (BMI), operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rates, and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities.

RESULTS

A total of 9 unique RCTs including 492 AR and 385 AP patients were screened and included in the final quantitative analysis. Patients who underwent SG with AR showed higher EWL and TWL at 6 months (EWL: P < .001; TWL: P = .006), and 1 year (EWL: P = .013; P < .001) postoperatively. The BMI was also lower in the AR group 3 months (P = .013) and 6 months (P = .003) postoperatively. However, the EWL and BMI at 2 years were comparable between both groups (P = .222 and P = .908, respectively). No statistical significance was observed in terms of operating time, staple line disruption, bleeding, complications with a Clavien-Dindo Grade >III, resolution of comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, arthritis/back pain), and de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease (P > .05). AP was associated with a slightly shorter postoperative hospital stay (4.0 versus 3.1 days, P = .039).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic SG with AR is associated with superior weight loss in the short-term compared with AP. However, mid-term follow-up beyond 1 year showed no significant differences in BMI or incidence of de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease.

The Incidence of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Obese Patients—A Large Single Center Experience

Background and Objectives: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms located mainly in the fundus (60–70%). The incidence of GIST is approximately 10 per million population per year in Europe, with a peak incidence at the age of 63. Recent studies suggest that morbidly obese patients have a higher incidence of GIST than the general population. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of GIST in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in our department. Materials and Methods: this paper present the retrospective study of prospectively collected data of 1564 patients who underwent LSG in a single large bariatric center from October 2013 to September 2021. After surgery, each sample of the resected stomach was sent for histopathological examination. For the analysis, we included patients diagnosed with GIST intraoperatively or postoperatively. Results: GISTs were found in five patients (0.31%). There were three men and two women. The mean age was 50.2 (range 32–63 ± 11.8) and the mean preoperative body mass index was 43.3 kg/m² (40–49.4 ± 3.2). In four cases, GISTs were found in the fundus (80%), and in one in the pylorus (20%). None of the tumors were larger than 7 mm in diameter and all were diagnosed as a very low-risk category. No adjuvant treatment was required. All patients achieved good or satisfactory bariatric and metabolic results. Conclusions: The incidence of GIST in our study was estimated at 0.31%. All patients had a very low-risk GIST and no recurrence until follow-up. Recent literature suggests that the risk of GIST is higher in the obese population, and therefore surgeons should be aware of the risk of incidental GIST during LSG.

Sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition in a series of 883 patients with mild obesity: early effectiveness and safety outcomes

BACKGROUND

At least 25 metabolic/bariatric procedures have been proposed globally, 5 formally endorsed. A newer procedure, sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (SG + TB), appears to markedly reduce weight and improve metabolic syndrome while being relatively simple technically and protective of long-term nutritional stability. We aimed to investigate SG + TB effectiveness and safety.

METHODS

In a single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, SG + TB patients were followed through 12 months. Primary outcomes were changes in weight [body mass index (BMI), total weight loss (TWL)], metabolic parameters [HbA1_C, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), hypertension], and nutritional status. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess changes in weight and metabolic parameters at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2019, 883 patients (mean age 51.8 yrs, BMI 34.1 ± 5.0 kg/m²) underwent SG + TB. Mean operative time was 124 ± 25.4 min; hospitalization, 4.0 ± 2.5 days. ANOVA indicated significant reductions in weight and metabolic parameters (p < 0.005). In 646 patients with complete weight data at 12 months, mean BMI was reduced to 27.2 ± 3.4 kg/m² (p < 0.001), TWL 19.8 ± 6.0%. HbA1_C was normalized in 83.3% of SG + TB patients; hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and hypertriglyceridemia were significantly reduced (p < 0.001). Also, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of patients outside normal nutritional reference ranges. The overall complication rate was 10.2%. There was no mortality.

CONCLUSION

In a series of 833 lower-BMI patients who underwent SG + TB and were followed through 12 months (73.2% follow-up), significant weight loss, comorbidity reduction, and nutritional stability were attained with few major complications and no mortality.