Comparison of 2-Year Results of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Transit Bipartition with Sleeve Gastrectomy for Superobesity

Novel Surgical Interventions for the Treatment of Obesity

Metabolic and bariatric surgery is widely recognized as the most effective and durable treatment for the disease of obesity and its associated comorbidities. In recent years, the field has seen significant advancements, introducing numerous innovative surgical options. This review aims to comprehensively examine these emerging surgical techniques, which have recently received endorsement from the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS). Additionally, we will explore new technologies and methodologies supported by the latest scientific evidence. Our analysis will include a critical evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of these novel approaches, providing a detailed update on the current state of metabolic and bariatric surgery, highlighting key developments and their potential implications for clinical practice.

Challenges in the care and treatment of patients with extreme obesity

Obesity is a prevalent chronic disease. The management of extreme obesity - i.e., body mass index (BMI) ≥ 50 kg/m2 or obesity class IV and V - is still far from ideal. Individuals with extreme obesity have a high risk of surgical complications, mortality, comorbidities, and reduced weight loss following bariatric surgery. Although lifestyle changes and anti-obesity medications are recommended for all patients with extreme obesity as adjuvants to weight loss, these measures are less effective than bariatric surgery. As a first step, sleeve gastrectomy or an inpatient very-low-calorie diet should be incentivized to enhance weight loss before definitive surgery. Although malabsorptive procedures lead to greater weight loss, they are associated with an increased risk of early complications and malnutrition. Nonstandard techniques employed in clinical trial protocols, such as transit bipartition, may be performed as they maintain a weight loss potency comparable to that of the classic duodenal switch but with fewer nutritional problems. Anatomical causes should be investigated in patients with postoperative suboptimal clinical response or recurrent weight gain. In these cases, the initiation of anti-obesity drugs, endoscopic therapies, or a conversion procedure might be recommended. More studies are needed to address the specific population of patients with extreme obesity, as their outcomes are expected to be distinct from those of patients with lower BMI.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With Transit Loop Bipartition and Transit Bipartition in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Obesity: A Retrospective Analysis

AIM

We aimed to compare 1-year postoperative results of patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (LSG-TB) and transit loop bipartition (LSG-TLB) and mini gastric bypass (MGB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective comparison of 2 novel bariatric surgery techniques with MGB. Primary outcome measure of the study was a rate of T2DM remission. Secondary outcomes included excess body mass index (BMI) loss, improvement in hepatosteatosis, and duration of operation. Revision surgery needs were also assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 32 patients underwent the LSG-TLB, 15 underwent LSG-TB, and 50 underwent MGB. Mean age and sex distribution were comparable for all groups. Presurgical BMI was similar in MGB and LSG + TB groups, whereas LSG + TLB group had significantly lower BMI values compared with the MGB group. In both groups, BMI values reduced significantly compared with respective baseline values. Excess BMI loss was significantly higher in patients who underwent LSG-TLB compared with patients treated with LSG-TB and MGB. Bariatric surgery procedures lasted shorter in LSG-TLB than in LSG-TB. However, the shortest of all was MGB. The remission of T2DM rates were 71% and 73.3% in LSG-TLB and LSG-TB groups, respectively ( P > 9.999). The rate of revision surgeries was comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, LSG-TLB took less time and provided significantly higher excess BMI loss compared with LSG-TB. T2DM remission and improvement rates were similar in both groups. LSG-TLB seemed like a promising bariatric surgery technique in patients with obesity and T2DM.

The Protective Effect of Transit Bipartition and Its Modification Against Sleeve Gastrectomy-Related Esophagitis in a Rodent Model

BACKGROUND

The protective effect of transit bipartition against esophagitis has not yet been proven. Thus, we investigate and compare the bariatric outcomes and esophagus' histological changes of sleeve gastrectomy (SG), SG with transit bipartition (SG-TB), and the proximal SG-TB (SG-PTB) in a rodent model.

METHODS

This study included 45 diabetic Sprague-Dawley rats assigned to one of the four groups, SG-PTB (n = 15), SG-TB (n = 12), SG (n = 10), and SHAM (n = 8). Eight surviving rats from each group were included for further investigation. Histological analysis of the gastroesophageal junction was performed. Body weight, food intake, glucose control, and hormonal changes (glucagon-like peptide-1 and insulin) were assessed before and after surgery in all groups.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, no significant differences were observed in food intake, body weight, and fasting blood glucose levels among the groups. Postoperatively, the SG-PTB and SG-TB groups showed significantly superior glucose control compared to the SG group following the gavage of glucose (p < 0.05). Postoperatively, the SG-PTB and SG-TB groups had higher postoperative GLP-1 levels than postoperative SG and SHAM groups. More severe esophageal hyperpapillomatosis (EHP) of the esophageal section was observed in the SG group. The mucosal height of the SG group was significantly higher than that of the SG-PTB, SG-TB, and SHAM groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The transit bipartition procedure may protect the distal esophagus from histological changes associated with esophagitis. Clinical studies are needed to confirm the anti-reflux effects of transit bipartition.

Testosterone Changes in Men With Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes 6 Months After Sleeve Gastrectomy With Transit Bipartition

BACKGROUND

Metabolic/bariatric surgery has been shown to increase testosterone in males with obesity. This study investigated the effect of the novel metabolic/bariatric surgery procedure, sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (SG-TB), on serum total testosterone and metabolic variable changes in men with obesity and type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

In a prospective single-center cohort study, laboratory samples were analyzed preoperatively and at 6 months following SG-TB in patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2. Changes in metabolic parameters and testosterone were evaluated.

RESULTS

Between July 2018 and March 2019, 166 patients with a mean baseline BMI of 34.9±3.8 kg/m2 (mean age 51.5±9.3 y), glycosylated hemoglobin 9.5±1.3%, and testosterone 3.1±1.3 underwent SG-TB. At 6-month follow-up, mean excess BMI loss was 70.2±24.3%; glycosylated hemoglobin, 6.6±1.1% (P<0.001); and testosterone, 4.5±1.5 (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

In the early term following SG-TB, more than any other factor assessed, BMI loss was found to be a significant driver of improvement in testosterone levels. Regardless of preoperative obesity classification, patients with initially low testosterone attained significantly increased testosterone levels at 6-month follow-up.

Can we abandon foregut exclusion for an ideal and safe metabolic surgery?

Foregut (foregut exclusions) and hindgut (rapid transit of nutrients to the distal intestine) theories are the most commonly used explanations for the metabolic improvements observed after metabolic surgeries. However, several procedures that do not comprise duodenal exclusions, such as sleeve with jejunojejunal bypass, ileal interposition, and transit bipartition and sleeve gastrectomy were found to have similar diabetes remission rates when compared with duodenal exclusion procedures, such as gastric bypass, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, and diverted sleeve with ileal interposition. Moreover, the complete exclusion of the proximal intestine could result in the malabsorption of several important micronutrients. This article reviews commonly performed procedures, with and without foregut exclusion, to better comprehend whether there is a critical need to include foregut exclusion in metabolic surgery.

Sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition in a series of 883 patients with mild obesity: early effectiveness and safety outcomes

BACKGROUND

At least 25 metabolic/bariatric procedures have been proposed globally, 5 formally endorsed. A newer procedure, sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (SG + TB), appears to markedly reduce weight and improve metabolic syndrome while being relatively simple technically and protective of long-term nutritional stability. We aimed to investigate SG + TB effectiveness and safety.

METHODS

In a single-center retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, SG + TB patients were followed through 12 months. Primary outcomes were changes in weight [body mass index (BMI), total weight loss (TWL)], metabolic parameters [HbA1_C, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), hypertension], and nutritional status. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess changes in weight and metabolic parameters at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2019, 883 patients (mean age 51.8 yrs, BMI 34.1 ± 5.0 kg/m²) underwent SG + TB. Mean operative time was 124 ± 25.4 min; hospitalization, 4.0 ± 2.5 days. ANOVA indicated significant reductions in weight and metabolic parameters (p < 0.005). In 646 patients with complete weight data at 12 months, mean BMI was reduced to 27.2 ± 3.4 kg/m² (p < 0.001), TWL 19.8 ± 6.0%. HbA1_C was normalized in 83.3% of SG + TB patients; hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and hypertriglyceridemia were significantly reduced (p < 0.001). Also, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of patients outside normal nutritional reference ranges. The overall complication rate was 10.2%. There was no mortality.

CONCLUSION

In a series of 833 lower-BMI patients who underwent SG + TB and were followed through 12 months (73.2% follow-up), significant weight loss, comorbidity reduction, and nutritional stability were attained with few major complications and no mortality.

Sutureless Duodeno-Ileal Anastomosis with Self-Assembling Magnets: Safety and Feasibility of a Novel Metabolic Procedure

BACKGROUND

Less invasive and safer anastomotic techniques are desirable. We aimed to determine technical feasibility and safety of sutureless duodeno-ileal side-to-side anastomosis in obese patients using self-assembling magnets.

METHODS

This was an open-label, prospective, and single-arm study including obese patients (BMI 30-50 kg/m²) with type II diabetes. The ileal magnet was deployed laparoscopically, and the duodenal magnet was deployed endoscopically. Both magnets were coupled under laparoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance. The primary endpoints were technical feasibility and safety. The secondary endpoints were patency of the anastomosis, HbA1c reduction, and weight loss 12 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 8 patients were enrolled in the study; median age was 51.5 years (range: 34-65), and median BMI was 38.8 kg/m² (range: 35-47.9). The mean procedural duration was 63.5 min (range: 41-95). No intraoperative complications were recorded, and no major postoperative morbidity related to the procedure occurred. Magnets were expelled at a median of 29.5 days after the procedure with no associated complications. Upper endoscopy at 12 months confirmed patent anastomoses with healthy-appearing mucosa in all patients. HbA1c reduced below 7.0% in 6 out of 8 (75%) patients, and greater than 5% of total body weight loss was observed in 7 out of 8 (87.5%) patients at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Sutureless duodeno-ileal side-to-side anastomosis using self-assembling magnets is feasible and safe in obese patients, and a dual-path enteral diversion with large-caliber and durable anastomosis can be achieved.

Comparing the Anti-diabetic Effect of Sleeve Gastrectomy with Transit Bipartition Against Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Using a Diabetic Rodent Model

PURPOSE

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has superior long-term diabetes remission outcomes to sleeve gastrectomy (SG). However, in regions with a high prevalence of gastric cancer, RYGB may not be the best option. This study aimed to investigate the anti-diabetic effect of SG with transit bipartition (SG-TB) compared with SG and RYGB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 32 diabetic Sprague-Dawley rat models were assigned to one of four groups: SG (n = 8), RYGB (n = 8), SG-TB (n = 8), and SHAM (n = 8). Body weight, food intake, blood glucose, and hormonal changes (glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), insulin, and glucagon) were measured to investigate the effect of surgery in all groups. Oral glucose tolerance test and insulin tolerance test were performed before and 8 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the postoperative changes in body weight and food intake among the SG, RYGB, and SG-TB groups. Postoperatively, the RYGB and SG-TB groups had significantly higher GLP-1 levels and lower insulin levels than the SG group. Further, RYGB and SG-TB had significantly better glucose control improvements than SG. There were no significant differences in GLP-1, insulin, glucagon, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance levels between RYGB and SG-TB. The preoperative and postoperative values of all variables in the SHAM group did not show significant differences.

CONCLUSION

In this study using a diabetes-induced rodent model, we found that the anti-diabetic effect of SG-TB is superior to that of SG and non-inferior to that of RYGB.

Sometimes the Best Solution Is Transit Bipartition: Video Case Report

The simplest definition of Santoro's operation is a sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition. Santoro et al. reported long-term data regarding sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition, which is a similar operation to duodenal switch but without complete exclusion of the duodenum to minimize nutritional complications and to allow endoscopic management of obstructive jaundice. Afterward, several studies proved the efficacy and safety of transit bipartition; the real benefit of this operation is the reduction of side effects and protein malnutrition compared with the bilio-pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. One of the well-known complications of sleeve gastrectomy is reflux which usually responds well to medical treatment, but in few cases, the reflux is refractory to conservative management and warrants surgical intervention as a conversion of the sleeve gastrectomy to other bariatric procedures. There are many theories concerning the increased incidence of gastro-esophageal reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy which included reduction of lower esophageal sphincter pressure due to the division of ligaments and blunting of the angle of His, reduction in gastric compliance, increased sleeve pressure with an intact pylorus due to the use of Bougie < 40 Fr, decreased sleeve volume and distensibility, and dilated upper part of the final shape with a relative narrowing of the mid-stomach without complete obstruction. Our video report aims to present a unique surgical case and to show the surgical technique in this patient despite the complex surgical history.