Effects of Bariatric Surgery on COVID-19: a Multicentric Study from a High Incidence Area

The EPICOVID19-BS study: a web-based epidemiological survey in bariatric patients

PURPOSE

To assess the occurrence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection/COVID-19, frequency of symptoms, clinical manifestations and behaviours in a sample of patients undergoing bariatric surgery (BS).

METHODS

The EPICOVID19-BS is an observational cross-sectional study conducted in Italy during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (September 2021-February 2022). Patients with severe/extreme obesity undergoing BS were asked to complete an online multiple-choice questionnaire and to provide additional clinical information and blood biochemistry. Positive COVID-19 cases were defined by the combination of positive nasopharyngeal swab test results and/or positive serological test results. Sociodemographic, clinical and behavioural characteristics were compared between positive and negative COVID-19 cases.

RESULTS

A total of 745 participants were enrolled (mean age 44.5 ± 10.5 years SD, 78% female). The proportion of positive COVID-19 cases was 20.4%. They were more likely to be health care workers, to have close contacts with confirmed cases, to use anti-inflammatory drugs, to have immune system disorders, to have previous CMV infection, to have lower cholesterol levels and to have less metabolic syndrome than negative cases. Infected participants significantly increased their use of national health resources for minor health problems. The majority of participants experienced flu-like symptoms and taste and smell disturbances. Only 9.6% were hospitalised and none required intubation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results seem to support the evidence that patients undergoing BS have a low rate of severe SARS-CoV2. Further longitudinal studies in multiple obesity treatment centres are needed to more effectively monitor and control obesity in this specific population.

Bariatric Surgery and COVID-19: a Change of Perspective in a New Phase of the Pandemic

PURPOSE

The protective role of bariatric surgery (BS) against COVID-19 has been reported by several studies, showing, in the first pandemic waves, better outcome of the infection in patients that had undergone BS. With the virus progressive endemicity, BS benefits on COVID-19 clinical course could appear less evident, while COVID-19 effects on BS outcomes must be investigated. In this national multicentric cross-sectional study, we compared COVID-19 incidence and clinical course between a cohort of patients that had undergone BS (OP) and a cohort of candidates to BS (WS); moreover, we analyzed BS outcomes based on SARS-CoV-2 positivity/negativity.

METHODS

From June to December 2021, 522 patients from five Italian referral centers were administered an 87-item telephonic questionnaire completing the analysis of electronic medical records. Demographics, COVID-19 "tested" incidence, suggestive symptoms and clinical outcome parameters of OP and WS were compared. BS outcomes parameters were compared between OP that developed the disease or not.

RESULTS

COVID-19 incidence was the same in OP and WS, while symptoms and clinical course seemed milder in OP, with no data individually reaching statistical significance. OP who developed SARS-CoV-2 infection had higher excess weight loss than negative OP (66.8% ± 22.1 vs. 57.7% ± 22.8, p = 0.029). Positive OP had had gastric-bypass (RYGB/OAGB) more frequently than negative ones (38.4% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

With the disease becoming endemic, BS protective role against COVID-19 seems clinically less relevant. BS outcomes can be affected by COVID-19, thus imposing careful follow-up for positive patients, especially if undergoing gastric-bypass.

Bariatric surgery and COVID-19 outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Obesity and its associated complications have a negative impact on human health. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) ameliorates a series of clinical manifestations associated with obesity. However, the overall efficacy of MBS on COVID-19 outcomes remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this article is to analyze the relationship between MBS and COVID-19 outcomes.

SETTING

A meta-analysis.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to retrieve the related articles from inception to December 2022. All original articles reporting MBS-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. Outcomes including hospital admission, mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation utilization, hemodialysis during admission, and hospital stay were selected. Meta-analysis with fixed or random-effect models was used and reported in terms of odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 test. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 10 clinical trials involving the investigation of 150,848 patients undergoing MBS interventions were included. Patients who underwent MBS had a lower risk of hospital admission (OR: .47, 95% CI: .34-.66, I2 = 0%), mortality (OR: .43, 95% CI: .28-.65, I2 = 63.6%), ICU admission (OR: .41, 95% CI: .21-.77, I2 = 0%), and mechanical ventilation (OR: .51, 95% CI: .35-.75, I2 = 56.2%) than those who did not undergo surgery, but MBS did not affect hemodialysis risk or COVID-19 infection rate. In addition, the length of hospital stay for patients with COVID-19 after MBS was significantly reduced (WMD: -1.81, 95% CI: -3.11-.52, I2 = 82.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that MBS is shown to improve COVID-19 outcomes, including hospital admission, mortality, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and hospital stay. Patients with obesity who have undergone MBS infected with COVID-19 will have better clinical outcomes than those without MBS.

The Association of Weight Reduction and Other Variables after Bariatric Surgery with the Likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although obesity has been confirmed as a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection and its severity, the role of post-bariatric surgery (BS) variables and the infection is unclear. We, therefore, aimed to study comprehensively the relationship between the extent of weight reduction after surgery and other demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables with the rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

METHODS

A population-based cross-sectional study was performed, utilizing advanced tracking methodologies on the computerized database of a nation-wide health maintenance organization (HMO). The study population included all HMO members aged ≥18 years that had been tested at least once for SARS-CoV-2 during the study period and underwent BS at least one year before their testing.

RESULTS

Of the total 3038 individuals who underwent BS, 2697 (88.78%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection and 341 (11.22%) were negative. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that the body mass index and the amount of weight reduction after the BS were not related to the likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Post-operative low socioeconomic status (SES) and vitamin D3 deficiency were associated with significant and independent increased rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection (odds ratio [OR] 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-2.03, p < 0.001; and OR 1.55, 95% CI, 1.18-2.02, p < 0.001; respectively). Post-operative physical activity > 3 times/week was associated with a significant and independent reduced rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR 0.51, 95% CI, 0.35-0.73, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Post-BS vitamin D3 deficiency, SES, and physical activity, but not the amount of weight reduction, were significantly associated with the rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Healthcare workers should be aware of these associations after BS and intervene accordingly.

Prior metabolic surgery reduced COVID-19 severity: Systematic analysis from year one of the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

Obesity is a risk factor for COVID-19 severity. Recent studies suggest that prior metabolic surgery (MS) modifies the risk of COVID-19 severity.

Methods

COVID-19 outcomes were compared between patients with MS (n = 287) and a matched cohort of unoperated patients (n = 861). Multiple logistic regression was used to identify predictors of hospitalization. A systematic literature review and pooled analysis was conducted to provide overall evidence of the influence of prior metabolic surgery on COVID-19 outcomes.

Results

COVID-19 patients with MS had less hospitalization (9.8% versus 14.3%, p = 0.049). Age 70+, higher BMI, and low weight regain after MS were associated with more hospitalization after COVID-19. A systematic review of 7 studies confirmed that MS reduced the risk of post-COVID-19 hospitalization (OR = 0.71, 95%CI = [0.61-0.83], p < 0.0001) and death (OR = 0.44, 95%CI = [0.30-0.65], p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

MS favorably modifies the risks of severe COVID-19 infection. Older age and higher BMI are major risk factors for severity of COVID-19 infection.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Success of Bariatric Surgeries in Patients with Severe Obesity

INTRODUCTION

SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) pandemic may influence the weight outcomes of bariatric surgeries (BS). Here, we intended to compare the weight outcome of patients who underwent BS before and during the pandemic time.

METHODS

In a retrospective, single-center study, the information of two groups of patients; first COVID-19 group (n = 51) consisted of those that underwent BS during the pandemic and completed a year of follow-up, second non-COVID-19 group included 50 patients who underwent BS and were followed up before the pandemic. All the patients' anthropometric and obesity-related disease data were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Weight loss and the decrease of body mass index 1 year after the surgery, as well as excess weight loss and total weight loss, were significantly higher in the non-COVID-19 group compared to the COVID-19 group (p < 0.05). Although the rate of remission for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia was higher in the non-COVID-19 group, the differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

We showed a significantly poorer weight outcome at the 1-year follow-up of the BS during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic. These results need further investigations to determine the preventive measures and management by evaluating the associated factors.

Is COVID-19 Severity Impacted by Bariatric Surgery in the Early Postoperative Period?

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine the real influence of bariatric surgery on the clinical evolution of patients infected with SARS-Cov-2 in the postoperative period.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis including two groups of patients: those who presented COVID-19 before bariatric surgery and those who presented it within 3 months of postoperative. Primary outcome was related to the severity of COVID-19, measured by the following variables: presence of symptoms, need for hospitalization, ICU admission, and invasive ventilation. Laboratory markers for inflammatory response, glycemic status, and micronutrients were analyzed as secondary outcomes.

Results

From the 222 individuals operated on within the study period, only 66 (29.7%) presented COVID-19, 42 (18.9%) in the preoperative period and 24 (10.8%) after the procedure. Mean age was 36.3 ± 9.5 years and mean preoperative BMI was 39.9 ± 4.2 kg/m². There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding symptoms presentation (92.9% × 87.5%, p = 0.66), need for hospitalization (11.9% × 16.7%, p = 0.713), ICU admission (4.8% × 4.2%, p = 1.000), and invasive ventilation (2.4% × 0.0%, p = 1.000). Regarding the quantitative variables, absolute lymphocyte count was significantly lower in the group who presented COVID-19 after surgery (1822.9 ± 482.2 × 2158.6 ± 552.9, p = 0.035).

Conclusion

Patients who had COVID-19 before and after sleeve gastrectomy did not differ with statistical significance for the presence of symptoms, need for hospitalization, ICU admission, and invasive ventilation.

Graphical abstract

Early COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Characteristics in Mothers Following Bariatric Surgery

BACKGROUND

Obesity has played a central role in heightened coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) risk and vaccine response. COVID-19 vaccine intention among those with a history of severe obesity, specifically those who have undergone bariatric surgery, has not been described. This study aims to examine early COVID-19 vaccine intention among mothers with a history of severe obesity who underwent bariatric surgery.

METHODS

Sixty-four mothers (M_age = 39.3 years) who underwent bariatric surgery (M_{time since surgery} = 19.6 months) completed surveys online (November 2020-February 2021). Information obtained included their COVID-19 vaccine intention (vaccine ready, undecided, vaccine opposed). Analyses examined group differences in demographics, body mass index (BMI = kg/m²), knowledge of obesity-related COVID-19 risk, flu vaccination history, general beliefs about vaccine safety/effectiveness, and factors increasing confidence/motivation to obtain a COVID-19 vaccine.

RESULTS

Thirty-six (56.3%) mothers had severe obesity (≥ Class II [BMI =  ≥ 35 kg/m²]). The majority were vaccine hesitant (undecided [n = 28; 43.8%]; vaccine opposed [n = 15; 23.4%]). Compared to the vaccine-ready group, vaccine-hesitant groups were younger (p < .05). For the vaccine opposed, recent flu vaccination rates (p = .012) and general belief that vaccines are safe (p = .028) were lower than expected. Among hesitant participants, no reported side effects and the health of self and others were endorsed as top factors increasing vaccine confidence and motivation respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

While preliminary, the prominence of early vaccine hesitancy in this sample of mothers who have undergone bariatric surgery, with most persisting with severe obesity, indicates a subgroup at high risk. Factors to address through targeted messaging and intervention were identified.

Impact of prior bariatric surgery on risk and severity of COVID-19 infection: A meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND

The association of prior bariatric surgery (BS) with infection rate and prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis of observational studies to address this issue.

METHODS

We searched databases including MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception to May, 2022. The primary outcome was risk of mortality, while secondary outcomes included risk of hospital/intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury (AKI), and infection rate.

RESULTS

Eleven studies involving 151,475 patients were analyzed. Meta-analysis showed lower risks of mortality [odd ratio (OR)= 0.42, 95% CI: 0.27-0.65, p < 0.001, I² = 67%; nine studies; 151,113 patients, certainty of evidence (COE):moderate], hospital admission (OR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.36-0.85, p = 0.007, I² =74.6%; seven studies; 17,810 patients; COE:low), ICU admission (OR=0.5, 95% CI: 0.37-0.67, p < 0.001, I² =0%; six studies; 17,496 patients, COE:moderate), mechanical ventilation (OR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.37-0.72, p < 0.001, I² =57.1%; seven studies; 137,992 patients, COE:moderate) in patients with prior BS (BS group) than those with obesity without surgical treatment (non-BS group). There was no difference in risk of AKI (OR=0.74, 95% CI: 0.41-1.32, p = 0.304, I² =83.6%; four studies; 129,562 patients, COE: very low) and infection rate (OR=1.05, 95% CI: 0.89-1.22, p = 0.572, I² =0%; four studies; 12,633 patients, COE:low) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis from matched cohort studies demonstrated associations of prior BS with lower risks of mortality, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and AKI.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed a correlation between prior BS and less severe COVID-19, which warrants further investigations to verify.

Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices towards SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among morbid obese individuals: a pilot study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Vaccinations have dramatically impacted on the ongoing pandemic of COVID-19, the disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). As morbid obese (MO) individuals are at high risk for severe complications, their acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is of certain public health interest.

METHODS

We investigated the knowledge, attitudes and eventual acceptance of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 vaccination among MO individuals either in waiting list, or recipients of bariatric surgery from a reference center (Parma University Hospital) shortly before the inception of the Italian mass vaccination campaign (March 2021). Data were collected through a web-based questionnaire. Association of individual factors with acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was assessed by means of a logistic regression analysis with eventual calculation of adjusted Odds Ratios (aOR) and corresponding 95% Confidence Intervals (95%CI).

RESULTS

Adequate, general knowledge of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 was found in the majority of MO patients. High perception of SARS-CoV-2 risk was found in around 80% of participants (79.2% regarding its occurrence, 73.6% regarding its potential severity). Acceptance of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 vaccination was reported by 65.3% of participants, and was more likely endorsed by MO patients who were likely to accept some sort of payment/copayment (aOR 5.783; 1.426; 23.456), or who were more likely towards a vaccination mandate (aOR 7.920; 1.995; 31.444).

CONCLUSIONS

Around one third of the MO individuals among potential recipient of bariatric surgery exhibited some significant hesitancy towards SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, and a rational approach may fail to capture and address specific barriers/motivators in this subset of individuals, stressing the importance for alternative interventions. (www.actabiomedica.it).

Bariatric Surgery and COVID-19: What We Have Learned from the Pandemic in Iran: a Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Little is known about the symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on patients with morbid obesity following bariatric surgery (BS) in Iran. Thus, we sought to investigate the symptoms and effect of COVID-19 in patients with morbid obesity following, or candidates for, BS in Iran.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective observational cohort study, we enrolled 236 morbid obese patients following (surgical group) or candidates (nonsurgical group) for bariatric surgery. Demographics, probable COVID-19 incidence, acute and persistent COVID-19 symptoms, and clinical outcome parameters of bariatric patients and candidates for BS were compared. The incidence of probable COVID-19 was assessed including the clinical definition of probable case, according to World Health Organization criteria.

RESULTS

The incidence of probable COVID-19 among surgical and nonsurgical groups was significantly different (20.6% vs 26.08%, respectively, p = 0.046). The probable case of surgical patients had a shorter length of symptoms and hospitalization duration, and a lower proportion of admission in ICUs and hospitals with respect to nonsurgical patients (p < 0.001). Surgical patients had a greater prevalence of persistent symptoms including anorexia, food intolerance, and anosmia-hyposmia than nonsurgical patients. Moreover, surgical patients with probable COVID-19 had a significantly higher proportion of diabetic patients than surgical patients without probable COVID-19 (20% vs 9.3%).

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the need to evaluate the persistent symptoms of COVID-19 and the importance of nutritional support for at least several weeks after COVID-19 symptom onset. Moreover, it seems that COVID-19 incidence in post-bariatric surgery patients could reduce the effectiveness of bariatric surgery in the resolution of diabetes.

Outcomes of obese patients hospitalized with COVID-19: the impact of prior bariatric surgery

Background

Obesity and several obesity-related co-morbidities are risk factors for severe COVID-19 disease. Because bariatric surgery successfully treats obesity-related conditions, we hypothesized that prior bariatric surgery may be associated with less severe COVID-19 disease.

Objectives

To examine the association between prior bariatric surgery and outcomes in patients with obesity admitted with COVID-19.

Setting

United States

Methods

The Vizient database was used to obtain demographic and outcomes data for adults with obesity admitted with COVID-19 from May 2020 to January 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with and those without prior bariatric surgery. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were mortality by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and co-morbidity; intubation rate; hemodialysis rate; and length of stay. Because the database only provides aggregate data and not patient-level data, multivariate analysis could not be performed.

Results

Among the 124,699 patients with obesity admitted with COVID-19, 2,607 had previous bariatric surgery and 122,092 did not. The proportion of patients ≥65 years of age was higher in the non–bariatric surgery group (36.0% versus 27.6%, P < .0001). Compared with patients without prior bariatric surgery, patients with prior bariatric surgery had lower in-hospital mortality (7.8 versus 11.2%, P < .0001) and intubation rates (18.5% versus 23.6%, P = .0009). Hemodialysis rate (7.2% versus 6.9%, P = .5) and length of stay (8.8 versus 9.6 days, P = .8) were similar between groups. Mortality was significantly lower in the bariatric surgery group for patients 18–64 years of age (5.9% versus 7.4%, P = .01) and ≥65 years of age (12.9% versus 17.9%, P = .0006).

Conclusions

This retrospective cohort study found that inpatients with obesity and COVID-19 who had prior bariatric surgery had improved outcomes compared with a similar cohort without prior bariatric surgery. Further studies should examine mechanisms for the association between bariatric surgery and less severe COVID-19.

Impact of bariatric surgery on the risk of hospitalization due to influenza virus infection

BACKGROUND

Obesity independently increases the risk of hospitalization due to viral respiratory infections, including influenza virus and, more recently, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. As an independent risk factor, obesity impairs the immune response to viral infections and decreases the effectiveness of immunizations.

OBJECTIVES

Using influenza as a proxy, we aimed to determine the impact of bariatric surgery (BaS) on the risk of hospitalization due to viral respiratory infections.

SETTING

Academic hospital, United States.

METHODS

National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample data collected from 2010 to 2015 were examined. Patients were classified as treatment and control groups. Treatment subjects were defined as patients with a history of BaS and control subjects as patients with a body mass index ≥35 kg/m² and without a history of BaS. Any hospitalization with influenza as a primary diagnosis was identified. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression models were performed to assess the differences between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 2,300,845 subjects were reviewed, of which 2,004,804 were control subjects and 296,041 were treated patients. Univariate analysis showed that the hospitalization rate in the treatment group was significantly lower than in the control group (.007% versus .019%, P < .0001), which was confirmed after adjusting for covariables (control versus treatment: odds ratio = 2.21, P = .0010).

CONCLUSIONS

BaS may decrease the risk of hospitalization due to influenza, but further prospective studies are needed to confirm these results. We also suggest that these results should be translated into the development of similar studies to determine the impact of BaS on the incidence and severity of the coronavirus disease 2019.

Role of bariatric surgery in a COVID-19 era: a review of economic costs

Obesity has rapidly become a significant public health issue. As the prevalence of obesity continues to rise, so does its economic burden as a result of both direct and indirect costs. Likewise, since 2019, the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) has become a global pandemic with rising infection rates carrying significant economic costs associated with treatment of the disease and the reduction in economic activity due to government regulations. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a detrimental impact on obesity, not only creating an increasingly obesogenic environment but also reducing access to bariatric care and treatment of obesity-related diseases. In this article, we form a compelling argument for the resumption of bariatric services as soon as it is safe to do so because bariatric surgery brings significant additional medical and economic benefits. Medically, obesity is a risk factor for increased severity of COVID-19 infections, and therefore, treatment of obesity should be a priority in the current pandemic. Additionally, bariatric surgery has been shown to be a cost-saving procedure in the long term and thus has significant economic benefit in reducing the costs of obesity in the future as we recover from the economic collapse following the global pandemic.

SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Post-First Wave among Primary Care Physicians in Catania (Italy)

Family physicians or pediatricians and general practitioners (GPs) work in non-hospital settings. GPs usually visit many patients, frequently at their homes, with low potential, if any, to control the work setting. Particularly during the initial phases of the COVID-19 outbreak, they were not informed about the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2-infected patients, with inadequate information regarding the risk, a lack of suitable protective measures and, in some cases, deficient or poor accessibility to personal protective equipment (PPE). During the first wave of COVID-19, primary care physicians were on the front line and isolated the first cases of the disease. The present study aims to estimate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in a cohort of 133 GPs working in Catania (Italy) after the first wave of COVID-19. Serological analysis revealed a low seroprevalence (3%) among GPs. The low seroprevalence highlighted in the results can be attributed to correct management of patients by GPs in the first wave. It is now hoped that mass vaccination, combined with appropriate behavior and use of PPE, can help further reduce the risk of COVID-19 disease.