The cost utility of a multi-disciplinary foot protection clinic (MDFPC) in an Irish hospital setting

Effect of a multidisciplinary team approach in patients with diabetic foot ulcers on major adverse limb events (MALEs): systematic review and meta-analysis for the development of the Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot syndrome

The treatment of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is extremely complex, requiring a comprehensive approach that involves a variety of different healthcare professionals. Several studies have shown that a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is useful to achieve good clinical outcomes, reducing major and minor amputation and increasing the chance of healing. Despite this, the multidisciplinary approach is not always a recognized treatment strategy. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effects of an MDT approach on major adverse limb events, healing, time-to-heal, all-cause mortality, and other clinical outcomes in patients with active DFUs. The present meta-analysis was performed for the purpose of developing Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot with the support of the Italian Society of Diabetology (Società Italiana di Diabetologia, SID) and the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists (Associazione Medici Diabetologi, AMD). The study was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. All randomized clinical trials and observational studies, with a duration of at least 26 weeks, which compared the MDT approach with any other organizational strategy in the management of patients with DFUs were considered. Animal studies were excluded. A search of Medline and Embase databases was performed up until the May 1st, 2023. Patients managed by an MDT were reported to have better outcomes in terms of healing, minor and major amputation, and survival in comparison with those managed using other approaches. No data were found on quality of life, returning-to-walking, and emergency admission. Authors concluded that the MDT may be effective in improving outcomes in patients with DFUs.

Developing an interprofessional decision support tool for diabetic foot ulcers management in primary care within the family medicine group model: a Delphi study in Canada

BACKGROUND

Primary care professionals encounter difficulties coordinating the continuum of care between primary care providers and second-line specialists and adhere to practice guidelines pertaining to diabetic foot ulcers management. Family medicine groups are providing primary care services aimed to improve access, interdisciplinary care, coordination and quality of health services, and reduce emergency department visits. Most professionals working in family medicine groups are primary care physicians and registered nurses. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an interprofessional decision support tool to guide the management of diabetic foot ulcers for primary care professionals working within the family medicine group model.

METHODS

A one-page decision tool developed by the research team was validated by an expert panel using a three-round Delphi protocol held between December 2019 and August 2021. The tool includes 43 individual actions and a care pathway from initial presentation to secondary prevention. Data collection was realized with both paper and electronic questionnaires, and answers were compiled in an electronic spreadsheet. Data was analyzed with use of descriptive statistics, and consensus for each item was defined as ≥ 80% agreement.

RESULTS

Experts from 12 pre-identified professions of the diabetic foot ulcer interdisciplinary care team were included, 39 participants out of the 59 invited to first round (66.1%), 34 out of 39 for second (87.2%) and 22 out of 34 for third (64.7%) rounds. All items included in the final version of the decision support tool reached consensus and were deemed clear, relevant and feasible. One or more professionals were identified to be responsible for every action to be taken.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided a comprehensive decision support tool to guide primary care professionals in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Implementation and evaluation in the clinical setting will need to be undertaken in the future.

A novel Canadian multidisciplinary acute care pathway for people hospitalised with a diabetic foot ulcer

This manuscript describes the implementation and initial evaluation of a novel Canadian acute care pathway for people with a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). A multidisciplinary team developed and implemented an acute care pathway for patients with a DFU who presented to the emergency department (ED) and required hospitalisation at a tertiary care hospital in Canada. Processes of care, length of stay (LOS), and hospitalisation costs were considered through retrospective cohort study of all DFU hospitalizations from pathway launch in December 2018 to December 2020. There were 82 DFU-related hospital admissions through the ED of which 55 required invasive intervention: 28 (34.1%) minor amputations, 16 (19.5%) abscess drainage and debridement, 6 (7.3%) lower extremity revascularisations, 5 (6.1%) major amputations. Mean hospital LOS was 8.8 ± 4.9 days. Mean hospitalisation cost was $20 569 (±14 143): $25 901 (±15 965) when surgical intervention was required and $9279 (±7106) when it was not. LOS and hospitalisation costs compared favourably to historical data. An acute care DFU pathway can support the efficient evaluation and management of patients hospitalised with a DFU. A dedicated multidisciplinary DFU care team is a valuable resource for hospitals in Canada.

Development of a coordinated acute diabetic foot pathway for management of acute diabetic foot infection and ulceration

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) has become an increasingly common emergency presentation. These patients are presenting at a younger age and with increasingly complex co-morbidities. They require frequent hospitalisation for management of DFU which has significant consequences for management of health resources but also for quality of life in the diabetic patient population.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the development of a coordinated, streamlined acute diabetic foot pathway for management of in-patients presenting as emergencies with DFU on length of stay, re-admission to hospital and minor and major amputations.

METHODS

A dedicated acute diabetic foot pathway was introduced to St. Vincent's University Hospital (SVUH) in April 2016. Management of patients admitted urgently to the emergency department or out-patient clinics of St. Vincent's University Hospital during the 3-year period before April 2016 was compared to that of patients admitted in the 3 years after April 2016 following introduction of the acute diabetic foot pathway. Demographic data hospital length of stay, need for re-admission, major and minor amputations performed and cost of hospital stay were compared before and after introduction of the pathway.

RESULTS

There were 931 admissions with acute diabetic foot ulceration or infection between January 2012 and December 2019; 419 were admitted between January 2012 and March 2016 and 512 between April 2016 and December 2019. There was no difference in demographic data between the two time periods. Length of stay decreased from 13 +/- 4.24 to 3 +/- 1.41 days between the two time periods (p < 0.001). Re-admission rates within 30 days decreased from 21.7 to 10.1% (p < 0.05). The number of major lower limb amputations decreased over the two time periods from 8.8 to 7.2% with a concomitant increase in minor amputations from 16.7 to 25.3%. Risk of major lower limb amputation was significantly higher in those patients living more than 20 km from the hospital. Costs associated with in-patient stay for management of DFU decreased from €9,247,700 to €8,988,100 despite an 18% increase in the number of patients treated and a 9.9% increase in hospital admissions.

CONCLUSION

Introduction of a dedicated, streamlined pathway involving multi-disciplinary input resulted in a significant improvement in patient management as assessed by length of hospital stay and need for re-admission. While the number of major lower limb amputations has decreased there has been a significant increase in the number of minor amputations.

Evaluation of the North West London Diabetes Foot Care Transformation Project: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation

Introduction

Diabetes foot ulceration (DFU) presents an enormous burden to those living with diabetes and to the local health systems and economies. There is an increasing interest in implementing integrated care models to enhance the quality of care for people living with diabetes and related complications and the value of co-production approaches to achieve sustainable change. This paper aims to describe the evaluation methodology for the North West London (NWL) Diabetes Foot Care Transformation project.

Description

A mixed methods design including: i) a quasi-experimental quantitative analysis assessing the impact of the implementation of the local secondary care multi-disciplinary diabetes foot team clinics on service utilisation and clinical outcomes (amputations and number of healed patients); ii) a phenomenological, qualitative study to explore patient and staff experience; and iii) a within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis (pre and post 2017) to evaluate the programme cost-effectiveness.

Discussion and Conclusion

Demonstrating the impact of multidisciplinary, integrated care models and the value of co-production approaches is important for health providers and commissioners trying to improve health outcome. Evaluation is also needed to identify strategies to overcome barriers which might have reduced the impact of the programme and key elements for improvement.

Resource use within a multidisciplinary foot team clinic

OBJECTIVE

The establishment of multidisciplinary foot team clinics reduces the risk of amputation, but little is known about its resource requirement. This study evaluates the service's resource use for first visit attendees to an established multidisciplinary foot team clinic.

METHOD

A retrospective evaluation was performed for new referrals to the clinic over six months, including demographics, resource use and clinical outcome. Data were extracted electronically with retrospective review of electronic clinical notes.

RESULTS

A total of 240 first visit attendees were analysed. Mean age was 64±15years, 63% were male, 72% had type 2 diabetes, 16% had type 1 diabetes, 15% had a previous amputation, and 40% had a previous ulceration. Common presentations were ulcers (62%), osteomyelitis (11%), Charcot foot (19%), foot ischaemia (17%), post-surgical wounds (13%), and osteomyelitis (11%). At first attendance, 79% of patients required specialist services including diabetologist (45%), joint vascular review (23%), joint orthopaedics services (8%), dermatologist (2%), and orthotics services (1%). A total of 4% of patients had complex debridement, 0.4% total nail excision, 0.8% pus drainage, 3% cast-related procedures, and 1% vacuum-assisted dressing. Of the patients, 4% were admitted to hospital, 38% had vascular duplex investigations, 7% had a deep vein thrombosis scan, 16% had magnetic resonance imagine (MRI), and 5% had a bone scan.

CONCLUSION

A functional multidisciplinary foot team clinic requires significant resources-both clinical and administrative-for prompt investigations and revascularisation to sustain low amputation rates. Regular appraisal of resource use helps with clinic and pathway planning.

Will Multidisciplinary Collaboration Reduce the Disability Rate of Diabetic Foot (2009-2019)?-A Study Based on the Perspective of Organizational Reform

Objectives: Discuss the experience and practice of multidisciplinary cooperation of diabetic foot in China and analyze its impact on the quality of care.

Methods: This study observed the medical procedure by interviewing 12 key personnel in-depth. We extracted data from medical records and assessed the effect of MDT in three dimensions: quality, efficiency, and cost, to eventually achieve a final conclusion.

Results: The studied reform includes the following three aspects: the adjustment of hospital buildings layout and disciplines, one-stop outpatient, and one-stop inpatient service. After the multidisciplinary collaboration, the rate of above-knee amputation is reduced by 3.63%, the disability score per 100 diabetic foot patients decreases by 6.12, the average length of stay decreases significantly, and the cost of hospitalization shows an increasing trend.

Conclusions: Multidisciplinary collaboration is performed based on spatial layout adjustment and clinical pathway optimization, which provide more comprehensive and integrated care than a general medical team or a single specialist, thereby reducing the rate of disability, shortening the length of hospitalization. Besides, the new measurable indicator called disability score per 100 diabetic foot patients has been verified to evaluate the living ability of patients after surgery. This paper provides a reference for organizational reform of multidisciplinary diseases to support treatment and management of other multiorgan diseases.

Re-amputation and survival following toe amputation: outcome data from a tertiary referral centre

PURPOSE

Toe amputation is a commonly performed procedure for irreversible foot sepsis. However, outcome and predictors of outcome are poorly understood. Our aim was to determine survival and rate of progression to further amputation following index toe amputation.

METHODS

Consecutive patients between 2010 and 2015 were included. Progression to further minor amputation, major amputation or death was recorded. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were undertaken to determine independent predictors of outcome and survival.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-six patients were included, with mean age of 65 years. Fifty-five (37.7%) patients underwent hallux amputation, while 91 (62.3%) underwent amputation of non-hallux digit(s). Following index toe amputation, 63 (43.2%) patients progressed to further minor or major ipsilateral amputation, median time to which was 36 months. Twenty-one patients (14.4%) progressed to major ipsilateral amputation. Patients undergoing index non-hallux amputation were significantly more likely to require further minor amputation (P = 0.050); however, the rate of major amputation between hallux (14.5%) and non-hallux (14.3%) groups was similar. Overall, 5-year ipsilateral amputation-free (iAFS) was 39.6 ± 4.1%, ipsilateral major amputation-free (iMAFS) was 55.9 ± 4.1% and overall survival (OS) was 64.3 ± 4.0% and did not differ between index amputation sites.

CONCLUSION

Almost half of patients undergoing toe amputation required further digital amputation. However, limb preservation rates are high, and a majority of patients are alive at 5-year follow-up. There was no significant difference in outcome between patients undergoing hallux and non-hallux primary procedures. Overall, increasing age remains the only independent predictor of iMAFS and OS.

A systematic review with meta-analysis of the impact of access and quality of diabetic foot care delivery in preventing lower extremity amputation

AIMS

To assess the impact of diabetic foot care delivery in preventing lower extremity amputation (LEA).

METHODS

We systematically searched the MEDLINE database for research evaluating the association between any aspect of diabetic foot care delivery and risk of LEA. Meta-analysis was conducted by calculating a pooled odds ratio through a random effects model.

RESULTS

Our search retrieved 5093 articles. In total, 58 articles were included: 9 addressing healthcare access, 4 educating health professionals, 2 implementing guidelines, 6 receiving chiropody/podiatry care services and 37 implementing structured diabetic foot care services (SDFC). All of these aspects of diabetic foot care seemed to have a positive impact on preventing LEA. Only SDFC literature met criteria for performing a meta-analysis. For SDFC impact on preventing overall and major LEA but not for minor LEA compelling evidence was observed [aggregated odds ratio (OR) of 0.45 (95% CI 0.37-0.57), 0.40 (95% CI 0.32-0.51), and 0.87 (95% CI 0.67-1.14), respectively]. However, high heterogeneity (superior to 60%) was observed for all outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Results support a reduction in diabetic LEA frequency in association with structured diabetic foot care, and, in particular, major LEA. Less evidence is available for the remaining aspects of diabetic foot care delivery.

Lower extremity amputations in Ireland: a registry-based study

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the current provision of lower extremity amputations (LEA) in Irish public hospitals by patient characteristics and assess the potential savings for reducing numbers if a national multi-disciplinary foot protection clinic (MDFPC) was established nation-wide.

DESIGN AND DATA SOURCES

Patient characteristics of LEA conducted during 2016-2019 were analysed based on discharge data from the national hospital inpatient enquiry system. Reported consequences from existing literature were used to extrapolate national consequences.

RESULTS

Public hospitals registered 3104 hospital admissions with LEA during 2016-2019. 68% (n = 2099) of these were minor amputations. About 76% (n = 1592) of minor amputations and 52% (n = 525) of major amputations were performed on patients with a diagnosis of diabetes. If the implementation of a national MDFPC programmed could reduce the number of diabetic amputations by 20%, 80 minor and 26 major amputations could be avoided annually. This would avoid nearly 3000 hospital bed days and correspond to a potential annual saving of €3 M.

CONCLUSION

LEA has severe impact on patients' lives and hospital resources. Potential savings from effective prevention strategies may offer both health improvements and cost-savings.

Organizational changes in diabetic foot care practices for patients at low and moderate risk after implementing a comprehensive foot care program in Alberta, Canada

BACKGROUND

Neuropathy and vasculopathy can lead to costly and debilitating complications in people with diabetes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, at an organizational level, uptake of practices included in a diabetic foot care clinical pathway and associated resources. This research focused on patients at low and moderate risk in Alberta, Canada between 2014 to 2019.

METHODS

Serial surveys (2014, 2019) of practices related to screening and care of the feet of people with diabetes. Surveys were administered using a combination of targeted and snowball sampling in order to assess the impact of the clinical pathway first implemented in 2015. The pathway focused on screening, assessment and referral of patients from primary care. High-risk foot teams (HRFT) were established at six sites to provide increased access to specialty care. Comparative statistics were performed to assess differences in footcare practices between 2014 and 2019 using two-tailed Fisher's exact test or Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Respondents (n = 104, 2014 and n = 75, 2019) included personnel from primary health care, home care and long-term care, acute and emergency care, specialty clinics, diabetes-specific programs and private contractors. The proportion of primary care and home care/long-term care (HC/LTC) sites providing screening increased significantly (p < 0.05). A significant increase in the proportion of sites providing assessment for patients designated as moderate risk also increased from 35% (34 out of 96 sites) to 55% (36 out of 65 sites) (p < 0.05), particularly with respect to vascular assessment, and the proportion of sites reporting appropriate follow-up intervals according to the pathway recommendation was also improved.

CONCLUSION

Provision of a clinical pathway for diabetic foot care along with education and resources led to increased screening in primary care and HC/LTC settings in Alberta, Canada. HRFT provided primary healthcare providers with an important option for referral and also provided increased expertise for procedures such as vascular assessment for patients with moderate risk of ulceration. This comprehensive model has the potential to reduce progression of foot problems and overall health services utilization. Further analyses of outcomes such as incident lower limb amputation and long-term cost-effectiveness of pathway implementation are underway.

Trends and outcomes of non-traumatic major lower extremity amputations in an Irish tertiary referral hospital

OBJECTIVES

Data on vascular patients following amputation in Ireland is lacking, limiting capability to plan services. This paper seeks to benchmark survival and rehabilitation outcomes among vascular patients in Ireland following lower extremity amputation (LEA), and compare subgroups of those undergoing transfemoral (TFA) or transtibial amputation (TTA).

METHODS

A review was conducted of all patients who underwent non-traumatic TFA or TTA from 2000 to 2009 in a tertiary vascular surgery centre. Demographics, surgical data, perioperative outcomes, medium-term functional outcomes, and survival were assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-two patients (2:1 male: female) underwent 192 non-traumatic LEAs. Median age for TFA was 75 years and TTA 67 (p = 0.002). A percentage of 36.5% had undergone prior attempts at surgical revascularization, 25% had undergone prior distal amputation or debridement. Thirty-three (17%) required stump revision. Twenty-three (13.2%) died in hospital. Median survival for those who died in hospital was 17 days (0-367), versus 17 months (2-106) for those who survived to discharge.

CONCLUSION

LEA for vascular pathology has significant morbidity and mortality, with long in-patient stays and short median survival; there is need to focus on improving quality of life in postoperative pathways.

A systematic review of multidisciplinary teams to reduce major amputations for patients with diabetic foot ulcers

OBJECTIVE

Multiple single-center studies have reported significant reductions in major amputations among patients with diabetic foot ulcers after initiation of multidisciplinary teams. The purpose of this study was to assess the association between multidisciplinary teams (ie, two or more types of clinicians working together) and the risk of major amputation and to compile descriptions of these diverse teams.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception through May 24, 2019 for studies reporting the association between multidisciplinary teams and major amputation rates for patients with diabetic foot ulcers. We included original studies if ≥50% of the patients seen by the multidisciplinary team had diabetes, they included a control group, and they reported the effect of a multidisciplinary team on major amputation rates. Studies were excluded if they were non-English language, abstracts only, or unpublished. We used the five-domain Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety Model to describe team composition and function and summarized changes in major amputation rates associated with multidisciplinary team care. A meta-analysis was not performed because of heterogeneity across studies, their observational designs, and the potential for uncontrolled confounding (PROSPERO No. 2017: CRD42017067915).

RESULTS

We included 33 studies, none of which were randomized trials. Multidisciplinary team composition and functions were highly diverse. However, four elements were common across teams: teams were composed of medical and surgical disciplines; larger teams benefitted from having a "captain" and a nuclear and ancillary team member structure; clear referral pathways and care algorithms supported timely, comprehensive care; and multidisciplinary teams addressed four key tasks: glycemic control, local wound management, vascular disease, and infection. Ninety-four percent (31/33) of studies reported a reduction in major amputations after institution of a multidisciplinary team.

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary team composition was variable but reduced major amputations in 94% of studies. Teams consistently addressed glycemic control, local wound management, vascular disease, and infection in a timely and coordinated manner to reduce major amputation for patients with diabetic foot ulcerations. Care algorithms and referral pathways were key tools to their success.

Multidisciplinary clinics reduce treatment costs and improve patient outcomes in diabetic foot disease

OBJECTIVE

Diabetic foot disease poses a significant and rising financial burden on health care systems worldwide. This study investigated the effect of a new multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinic (MDDFC) in a large tertiary hospital on patient outcomes and treatment cost.

METHODS

Patients' records were retrospectively reviewed to identify all patients who had been managed in a new MDDFC between July 2014 and July 2017. The wound episode-the period from initial presentation to the achievement of a final wound outcome-was identified, and all relevant inpatient and outpatient costs were extracted using a fully absorbed activity-based costing methodology. Risk factor, treatment, outcome, and costing data for this cohort were compared with a group of patients with diabetic foot wounds who had been managed in the same hospital before the advent of the MDDFC using a generalized linear mixed model.

RESULTS

The MDDFC and pre-MDDFC cohorts included 73 patients with 80 wound episodes and 225 patients with 265 wound episodes, respectively. Compared with the pre-MDDFC cohort, the MDDFC group had fewer inpatient admissions (1.56 vs 2.64; P ≤ .001). MDDFC patients had a lower major amputation rate (3.8% vs 27.5%; P ≤ .001), a lower mortality rate (7.5% vs 19.2%; P ≤ .05), and a higher rate of minor amputation (53.8% vs 31.7%; P ≤ .01). No statistically significant difference was noted in the rate of excisional débridement, skin graft, and open or endovascular revascularization. In the MDDFC cohort, the median total cost, inpatient cost, and outpatient cost per wound episode was New Zealand dollars (NZD) 22,407.465 (U.S. dollars [USD] 17,253.74), NZD 21,638.93 (USD 16,661.97), and NZD 691.915 (USD 532.77), respectively. The MDDFC to pre-MDDFC wound episode total cost ratio was 0.7586 (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to compare the cost and treatment outcomes of diabetic foot patients treated in a large tertiary hospital before and after the introduction of an MDDFC. The results show that an MDDFC improves patient outcomes and reduces the cost of treatment. MDDFCs should be adopted as the standard of care for diabetic foot patients.

Multidisciplinary diabetic foot care in Sweden - A national survey

AIM

To investigate at a national level the multidisciplinary team (MDT) care of patients with diabetes mellitus and foot complications.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to all 75 Swedish hospitals with emergency departments, which were grouped according to size.

RESULTS

The response rate was 92%, 58/69 of the hospitals have a foot team. Most teams have access to an internal medicine specialist/diabetologist, podiatrist and orthotist. Fewer teams reported access to an orthopaedic surgeon and infectious diseases specialist and only half to a vascular surgeon. In joint MDT outpatient evaluations, the majority report the presence of an internal medicine specialist, podiatrist and orthotist, but 50% an infectious disease specialist and orthopaedic surgeon and only a few a vascular surgeon. In hospitalized patients, there is a reduction in the presence of all specialists. The registration of amputation rate and healed foot ulcers is low.

CONCLUSIONS

MDT care is mostly adopted among large and medium-sized hospitals in contrast to small ones, which could reflect unequal health care. Vascular surgeons seldom are present at MDT evaluations and there is a reduced regular input of specialists in the evaluation of hospitalized patients. The hospitals' ability to evaluate their work by potential quality control markers is poor.

The Case for Diabetes Population Health Improvement: Evidence-Based Programming for Population Outcomes in Diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review is to describe diabetes within a population health improvement framework and to review the evidence for a diabetes population health continuum of intervention approaches, including diabetes prevention and chronic and acute diabetes management, to improve clinical and economic outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have shown that compared to usual care, lifestyle interventions in prediabetes lower diabetes risk at the population-level and that group-based programs have low incremental medial cost effectiveness ratio for health systems. Effective outpatient interventions that improve diabetes control and process outcomes are multi-level, targeting the patient, provider, and healthcare system simultaneously and integrate community health workers as a liaison between the patient and community-based healthcare resources. A multi-faceted approach to diabetes management is also effective in the inpatient setting. Interventions shown to promote safe and effective glycemic control and use of evidence-based glucose management practices include provider reminder and clinical decision support systems, automated computer order entry, provider education, and organizational change. Future studies should examine the cost-effectiveness of multi-faceted outpatient and inpatient diabetes management programs to determine the best financial models for incorporating them into diabetes population health strategies.

Prevalence of foot disease and risk factors in general inpatient populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review studies reporting the prevalence in general adult inpatient populations of foot disease disorders (foot wounds, foot infections, collective 'foot disease') and risk factors (peripheral arterial disease (PAD), peripheral neuropathy (PN), foot deformity).

METHODS

A systematic review of studies published between 1980 and 2013 was undertaken using electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL). Keywords and synonyms relating to prevalence, inpatients, foot disease disorders and risk factors were used. Studies reporting foot disease or risk factor prevalence data in general inpatient populations were included. Included study's reference lists and citations were searched and experts consulted to identify additional relevant studies. 2 authors, blinded to each other, assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Applicable data were extracted by 1 author and checked by a second author. Prevalence proportions and SEs were calculated for all included studies. Pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random-effects models where 3 eligible studies were available.

RESULTS

Of the 4972 studies initially identified, 78 studies reporting 84 different cohorts (total 60 231 517 participants) were included. Foot disease prevalence included: foot wounds 0.01-13.5% (70 cohorts), foot infections 0.05-6.4% (7 cohorts), collective foot disease 0.2-11.9% (12 cohorts). Risk factor prevalence included: PAD 0.01-36.0% (10 cohorts), PN 0.003-2.8% (6 cohorts), foot deformity was not reported. Pooled prevalence estimates were only able to be calculated for pressure ulcer-related foot wounds 4.6% (95% CI 3.7% to 5.4%)), diabetes-related foot wounds 2.4% (1.5% to 3.4%), diabetes-related foot infections 3.4% (0.2% to 6.5%), diabetes-related foot disease 4.7% (0.3% to 9.2%). Heterogeneity was high in all pooled estimates (I(2)=94.2-97.8%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This review found high heterogeneity, yet suggests foot disease was present in 1 in every 20 inpatients and a major risk factor in 1 in 3 inpatients. These findings are likely an underestimate and more robust studies are required to provide more precise estimates.