Current Standards for Organ Preservation in Locoregionally Advanced Non-nasopharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer and Evolving Strategies for Favorable-Risk and Platinum-Ineligible Populations

Oncologic Outcomes of Salvage Surgery in Recurrent Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the oncologic outcomes and identify prognostic factors in patients undergoing salvage glossectomy for recurrent oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted encompassing all patients who underwent salvage oral glossectomy out of 259 individuals undergoing oral glossectomy at a tertiary academic center. Inclusion criteria comprised patients who met the following conditions: 1) biopsy-proven oral tongue recurrence, 2) salvage glossectomy performed with curative intent, 3) availability of imaging records, and 4) comprehensive documentation. Cases involving base of tongue tumors and second primaries were excluded from the analysis. Categorical data were expressed as proportions, and continuous data as medians/quartiles. Univariate analysis used Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Student's t-test for continuous ones. Survival analysis employed Kaplan-Meier estimates and the log-rank test.

RESULTS

High-risk histopathological risk factors were significantly more common with recurrence compared to initial presentation. The mean locoregional disease-free interval was 35 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates for one- and three-year disease-free survival (DFS) were 62.7% and 33.4%, while disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 73% and 38.9%, respectively. Recurrent T-stage was a predictor for DFS, while margin status was a strong predictor for both LR control (p = 0.024) and DSS (p = 0.030), as was perineural invasion (p = 0.001 and p = 0.030). Alcohol use was associated with worse overall survival (p = 0.024). In contrast to other reports, nodal status was not a predictor in this series.

CONCLUSIONS

Upon recurrence, histopathological analysis unveils detrimental changes in tumor biology, which significantly influence disease control. Notably, consistent with findings from other studies, factors, such as recurrent T-stage, presence of perineural invasion, and, most importantly, margin status, play pivotal roles in determining oncologic outcomes. Consequently, the imperative for aggressive salvage surgery becomes evident in achieving sufficient disease control. This underscores the necessity for proactive management strategies aimed at addressing these factors to enhance patient outcomes.

Therapeutic Vaccines for HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal and Cervical Cancer: The Next De-Intensification Strategy?

The rise in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has prompted a quest for further understanding of the role of high-risk HPV in tumor initiation and progression. Patients with HPV-positive OPSCC (HPV+ OPSCC) have better prognoses than their HPV-negative counterparts; however, current therapeutic strategies for HPV+ OPSCC are overly aggressive and leave patients with life-long sequalae and poor quality of life. This highlights a need for customized treatment. Several clinical trials of treatment de-intensification to reduce acute and late toxicity without compromising efficacy have been conducted. This article reviews the differences and similarities in the pathogenesis and progression of HPV-related OPSCC compared to cervical cancer, with emphasis on the role of prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines as a potential de-intensification treatment strategy. Overall, the future development of novel and effective therapeutic agents for HPV-associated head and neck tumors promises to meet the challenges posed by this growing epidemic.

Historical Perspective: How the Discovery of HPV Virus Led to the Utilization of a Robot

The treatment of oropharyngeal cancer has undergone many paradigms shifts in recent decades. First considered a surgical disease, improvements in radiotherapy led to its popularization in the 1990s. Subsequently, the discovery of the human papillomavirus (HPV) in the pathogenesis of oropharyngeal cancer, as well as the increase in HPV-associated oropharynx cancer incidence, have prompted a reevaluation of its management. Its sensitivity to standard treatment with a favorable prognosis compared to non HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer led to a focus on minimizing treatment toxicity. Advances in radiation and surgical techniques, including the use of transoral robotic surgery, gave the rationale to ongoing de-escalation clinical trials in HPV-associated oropharynx cancer.

An Updated Review on Head and Neck Cancer Treatment with Radiation Therapy

The complexity of head and neck cancers (HNC) mandates a multidisciplinary approach and radiation therapy (RT) plays a critical role in the optimal management of patients with HNC, either as frontline or adjuvant treatment postoperatively. The advent of both definitive and post-operative RT has significantly improved the outcomes of patients with HNC. Herein, we discuss the role of postoperative RT in different subtypes of HNC, its side effects, and the importance of surveillance. The treatment regions discussed in this paper are the oral cavity, nasopharynx, paranasal sinus cavity, oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx. Multiple studies that demonstrate the importance of definitive and/or postoperative RT, which led to an improved outlook of survival for HNC patients will be discussed.

John MA. Time for a Paradigm Shift in Head and Neck Cancer Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic

OBJECTIVE

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused physicians and surgeons to consider restructuring traditional cancer management paradigms. We aim to review the current evidence regarding the diagnosis and management of head and neck cancer, with an emphasis on the role of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) during a pandemic.

DATA SOURCES

COVID-19 resources from PubMed, Google Scholar, the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and the American Head and Neck Society were examined.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies and guidelines related to the multidisciplinary management of head and neck cancer in the COVID-19 setting were reviewed. A total of 54 studies were included. Given the continuously evolving body of literature, the sources cited include the latest statements from medical and dental societies.

RESULTS

The unpredictable fluctuation of hospital resources and the risk of the nosocomial spread of SARS-CoV-2 have direct effects on head and neck cancer management. Using an MDT approach to help define "essential surgery" for immediately life- or function-threatening disease processes in the context of available hospital resources will help to maximize outcomes. Early enrollment in an MDT is often critical for considering nonsurgical options to protect patients and health care workers. The role of the MDT continues after cancer treatment, if delivered, and the MDT plays an essential role in surveillance and survivorship programs in these challenging times.

CONCLUSION

Head and neck cancer management during the COVID-19 pandemic poses a unique challenge for all specialists involved. Early MDT involvement is important to maximize patient outcomes and satisfaction in the context of public and community safety.