Pharmacological Properties of Faster-Acting Insulin Aspart

Entwicklung der Insulintherapie in der pädiatrischen Diabetologie- Auswertung des DPV-Registers von 1995-2021

Der Einsatz von Insulin zur Therapie des Diabetes mellitus Typ 1 beim Menschen hat vor 100 Jahren erstmals zum Überleben betroffener Patienten nach Manifestation der Erkrankung geführt. War zuvor die Diagnose mit der Gewissheit verknüpft, dass es sich um eine unmittelbar lebensbedrohliche Erkrankung handelt, wurde mit dem Einsatz des Hormons Insulin ab 1922 die Perspektive eröffnet, den Verlauf der Erkrankung zu beeinflussen und die Prognose für die Patienten damit zu verbessern.

Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit ist die Analyse von 92366 Patienten eines pädiatrischen Patientenkollektivs aus Deutschland, Österreich, Luxemburg und der Schweiz im Hinblick auf den Einsatz der verschiedenen Insulinarten im Zeitraum 1995–2021.

Der Anteil der Insulinanaloga stieg insbesondere seit dem Jahr 2000 stark an, auch da die Nutzung von Insulinpumpen mit Analoginsulin im Vergleich zur intensivierten Insulintherapie mit Pen für alle Altersgruppen deutlich anstieg. Bereits im Jahr 2010 betrug der Anteil der Insulinanaloga in der Diabetestherapie bei Kindern insgesamt > 60 %.

Im Jahr 2022 können Diabetologen auf mehr als zehn Insulinarten und mindestens fünf verschiedene Therapieformen zur Behandlung des Diabetes mellitus Typ 1 zurückgreifen.

Comparative assessment of modern parameters of glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes after switching to fast-acting insulin aspart using Flash Glucose Monitoring in real clinical practice

BACKGROUND: Postprandial hyperglycaemia contributes significantly to the lack of glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1). At least a quarter of patients forget to inject insulin before meals once a week, and more than 40% of them inject bolus insulin immediately before meals, which does not correspond to the pharmacokinetic effects of ultrashort insulins and determines the need to use insulins with better imitations of physiological insulin secretion.

AIM: To assess the effect of fast acting insulin aspart (FIAsp) on the current parameters of glycaemic control in children with DM1 after switching from insulin Asp (iAsp) using continuous glucose monitoring.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter observational 12-week prospective open-label uncontrolled comparative study was initiated. A group of insufficiently controlled patients were identified (n = 48) including a group on multiple insulin injections therapy (MII) (insulin degludec and IAsp) and a group on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) of iAsp. Three 14-day flash glucose monitoring (FMG) were performed: before transferring patients to FiAsp and after 2 and 12 weeks of the transfer. Key endpoints: HbA1c after 2 and 12 weeks on FiAsp relative to baseline, analysis of 5 FMG target glucose ranges, presented as an ambulatory glycemic profile. Additional indicators: dynamics of insulin daily dose, frequency of glucose self- monitoring, the number of severe hypoglycemia, adverse events that occurred during treatment.

RESULTS: 2 weeks after the transfer from IAsp to FIAsp, TIR increased in the entire group of patients: from 53% [44.3; 66.5] to 57% [47.4; 71.0] (p-value = 0.010) and TAR decreased from 38% [24.8; 50.2] to 30.5% [22.0; 45, 0] (p-value = 0.0124). Maintaining and increase time spent in the target glucose ranges during a 12-week observation period, in parallel with a significant decrease in hypoglycemic episodes <3.9 mmol / L per week, on FIAsp therapy naturally leads to an improvement in diabetes control: a decrease in HbA1c from 8.15% up to 7.75% (p-value = 0.0224), more pronounced in the group of patients on CSII — from 7.9% to 7.5% (p-value = 0.028).

CONCLUSION: Switching from IAsp to BDIAsp in routine clinical practice in the MII and CSII regimen in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes allows achieving better glycemic control compared to the previous generation prandial insulin analog Iasp. The better diabetes control is associated with an increase or a trend towards an increase in TIR and a decrease or a trend towards a decrease in TAR and TBR, as well as a significant decrease in episodes of hypoglycemia.

Faster Insulin Aspart for Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion: Is It Worth It?

Introduction

Faster insulin aspart (fASP) is the new formulation of insulin aspart (ASP) with a left-shifted pharmacokinetic profile, allowing better control of early postprandial hyperglycemia and a reduction in the risk of late post-meal hypoglycemia. However, it can be associated with more frequent infusion set changes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety one, three, and six months after starting fASP in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) systems.

Methods

This is a retrospective study that included adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus, users of CSII ≥3 months, who started fASP. Exclusion criteria included less than one month of follow-up after the intervention, concomitant initiation of pharmacological therapy, pre-conception period, and non-use of continuous glucose monitoring.

Results

A total of 77 individuals were included, of which 52 (67.5%) were female, aged 39.87 ± 13.10 years, with a mean time under CSII of 7.30 ± 3.58 years and a median follow-up time after transition to fASP of six months. There was a trend to a global glycemic control improvement at six months after starting fASP: numeric increase in time in range (56.40 ± 12.62% vs 60.15 ± 13.53%, p=0.148), reduction in time above range (37.76 ± 13.05% vs 34.67 ± 14.94%, p=0.557), time below range (6.00 (5.00)% vs 4.50 (5.25)%, p=0.122), and mean glucose (174.29 ± 25.14 mg/dL vs 167.00 ± 25.30 mg/dL, p=0.207). There was a reduction in body mass index (BMI) at six months after switching to fASP (25.08 (4.59) kg/m² vs 24.45 (3.05) kg/m², p=0.010), despite the absence of a significant variation in total daily insulin. Adverse event and discontinuation rates were 7.8% and 6.5%, respectively, with no documented episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia.

Conclusions

fASP proved to be a safe and effective therapeutic option in CSII systems associated with a significant BMI reduction, aspects that might justify its preference.

Current Status and Emerging Options for Automated Insulin Delivery Systems

Combining technologies including rapid insulin analogs, insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitors, and control algorithms has allowed for the creation of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems. These systems have proven to be the most effective technology for optimizing metabolic control and could hold the key to broadly achieving goal-level glycemic control for people with type 1 diabetes. The use of AID has exploded in the past several years with several options available in the United States and even more in Europe. In this article, we review the largest studies involving these AID systems, and then examine future directions for AID with an emphasis on usability.

A Century of Progress in Diabetes Care with Insulin: A History of Innovations and Foundation for the Future

The year 2021 marks the 100th anniversary of the discovery of insulin, which has greatly changed the lives of people with diabetes and become a cornerstone of advances in medical science. A rapid bench-to-bedside application of the lifesaving pancreatic extract and its immediate commercialization was the result of a promising idea, positive drive, perseverance, and collaboration of Banting and colleagues. As one of the very few proteins isolated in a pure form at that time, insulin also played a key role in the development of important methodologies and in the beginning of various fields of modern science. Since its discovery, insulin has evolved continuously to optimize the care of people with diabetes. Since the 1980s, recombinant DNA technology has been employed to engineer insulin analogs by modifying their amino acid sequence, which has resulted in the production of insulins with various profiles that are currently used. However, unmet needs in insulin treatment still exist, and several forms of future insulins are under development. In this review, we discuss the past, present, and future of insulin, including a history of ceaseless innovations and collective intelligence. We believe that this story will be a solid foundation and an unerring guide for the future.

100 years of insulin: celebrating the past, present and future of diabetes therapy

The year 2021 marks the centennial of Banting and Best's landmark description of the discovery of insulin. This discovery and insulin's rapid clinical deployment effectively transformed type 1 diabetes from a fatal diagnosis into a medically manageable chronic condition. In this Review, we describe key accomplishments leading to and building on this momentous occasion in medical history, including advancements in our understanding of the role of insulin in diabetes pathophysiology, the molecular characterization of insulin and the clinical use of insulin. Achievements are also viewed through the lens of patients impacted by insulin therapy and the evolution of insulin pharmacokinetics and delivery over the past 100 years. Finally, we reflect on the future of insulin therapy and diabetes treatment, as well as challenges to be addressed moving forward, so that the full potential of this transformative discovery may be realized.

Comparative effects of insulin glulisine and lispro on postprandial plasma glucose and lipid profile in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Objective

The control of postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) excursions is critical in the prevention of diabetic complications. Controversy remains on the differences in postprandial actions of insulin glulisine and lispro. The aim of this study was to define the differences in the efficacy of these two insulin analogues on PPG.

Methods

The study subjects were 20 in-hospital patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Plasma glucose (PG) was tightly controlled with basal insulin and insulin glulisine or lispro, and then glulisine or lispro were switched to the other insulin analog every other day for 6 study days. PG was measured before breakfast and 0.5-, 1-, and 2 h-postprandial during the study. Postprandial plasma C-peptide and lipids were analyzed in the first 2 days of the study. Postprandial increments in each parameter were compared between glulisine and lispro.

Results

Whereas the median value of 0.5 h-Δ-PPG was comparable in glulisine and lispro, the 1 h-Δ-PPG was significantly lower with lispro than with glulisine (41 vs 53 mg/dl, respectively, p = 0.03). Similarly, the 2 h-Δ-PPG with lispro was 10 mg/dl lower than that with glulisine (35 vs 45 mg/dl, respectively, p = 0.05). In parallel with PPG, Δ-C-peptide at 1- and 2 h-postprandial were significantly lower with lispro than glulisine (0.50 vs 0.75 ng/ml, respectively, and 0.55 vs 0.75 ng/ml, respectively). The increment in LDL-C and HDL-C was significantly lower with lispro than with glulisine at 0.5 h-postprandial.

Conclusion

Insulin lispro seems superior to glulisine in the control of PPG in Japanese patients with T2DM.

Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart: A Review of its Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties and the Clinical Consequences

Fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is insulin aspart (IAsp) with two added excipients, l-arginine and niacinamide, to ensure formulation stability with accelerated initial absorption after subcutaneous administration compared with previously developed rapid-acting insulins. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of faster aspart have been characterised in clinical pharmacology trials with comparable overall methodology. In subjects with type 1 (T1D) or type 2 (T2D) diabetes, the serum IAsp concentration–time and glucose-lowering effect profiles are left-shifted for faster aspart compared with IAsp. In addition, faster aspart provides earlier onset, doubling of initial exposure, and an up to 2.5-fold increase in initial glucose-lowering effect within 30 min of subcutaneous injection, as well as earlier offset of exposure and effect. Similar results have been shown using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). The improved pharmacological properties of faster aspart versus IAsp are consistent across populations, i.e. in the elderly, children, adolescents and the Japanese. Thus, the faster aspart pharmacological characteristics more closely resemble the mealtime insulin secretion in healthy individuals, giving faster aspart the potential to further improve postprandial glucose control in subjects with diabetes. Indeed, change from baseline in 1-h postprandial glucose increment is in favour of faster aspart versus IAsp when used as basal-bolus or CSII treatment in phase III trials in subjects with T1D or T2D. This review summarises the currently published results from clinical pharmacology trials with faster aspart and discusses the potential clinical benefits of faster aspart compared with previous rapid-acting insulin products.

The association between anti-insulin aspart antibodies and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of fast-acting insulin aspart in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is a novel formulation of insulin aspart (IAsp) ensuring ultrafast absorption and effect.

AIM

To compare the pharmacokinetics between faster aspart and IAsp, based on free or total IAsp measurement, and investigate the association between anti-IAsp antibodies and faster aspart and IAsp pharmacological properties in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

METHODS

In a randomized, two-period crossover trial, 12 children, 16 adolescents, and 15 adults (6-11, 12-17, and 18-64 years) received 0.2 U/kg double-blindsingle-dose subcutaneous faster aspart or IAsp followed by a standardized liquid meal test.

RESULTS

Across age groups, the pharmacokinetic profile was left-shifted including greater early exposure for faster aspart vs IAsp irrespective of free or total IAsp assay. Onset of appearance occurred 2.4 to 5.0 minutes (free) or 1.8 to 3.0 minutes (total) earlier for faster aspart vs IAsp (P < .05). Treatment ratios (faster aspart/IAsp) for 0 to 30 minutes IAsp exposure were 1.60 to 2.11 and 1.62 to 1.96, respectively (children, free: P = .062; otherwise P < .05). The ratio of free/total IAsp for overall exposure (AUC_IAsp,0-t ) was negatively associated with anti-IAsp antibody level across age. Pooling with a previous similar trial showed no clear association between anti-IAsp antibodies and meal test 1- or 2-hour postprandial glucose increment independent of age and insulin treatment (R² ≤ .070; P ≥ .17).

CONCLUSIONS

In children and adolescents with T1D, faster aspart provides ultrafast pharmacokinetics irrespective of free or total IAsp assay. Elevated anti-IAsp antibodies are associated with higher total IAsp concentration, but do not impact faster aspart and IAsp glucose-lowering effect.

Update on postprandial hyperglycaemia: the pathophysiology, prevalence, consequences and implications of treating diabetes

To achieve appropriate glycaemic control, postprandial and baseline hyperglycaemia should be reduced. Various epidemiological studies have suggested an association between fluctuations in postprandial blood glucose and cardiovascular risk. However, studies of interventions performed to date have not shown that selective control of postprandial hyperglycaemia is associated with cardiovascular benefits. Accordingly, an appropriate combination of drugs that control both baseline and postprandial hyperglycaemia (individually based on each patient's characteristics) is the best strategy for achieving good glycaemic control. This review seeks to impart to clinicians the concept of postprandial hyperglycaemia, analysing its causes, how to measure it, its prevalence, its consequences and, ultimately, the available therapeutic strategies for the preferential control of the postprandial hyperglycaemia along with baseline hyperglycaemia.

The quaternary structure of insulin glargine and glulisine under formulation conditions

The quaternary structures of insulin glargine and glulisine under formulation conditions and upon dilution using placebo or water were investigated using synchrotron small-angle X-ray scattering. Our results revealed that insulin glulisine in Apidra® is predominantly hexameric in solution with significant fractions of dodecamers and monomers. Upon dilution with placebo, this equilibrium shifts towards monomers. Insulin glargine in Lantus® and Toujeo® is present in a stable hexamer/dimer equilibrium, which is hardly affected by dilution with water down to 1 mg/ml insulin concentration. The results provide exclusive insight into the quaternary structure and thus the association/dissociation properties of the two insulin analogues in marketed formulations.

Emerging Technologies for Diabetes Care

New therapies, monitoring, and revolutionary enabling technologies applied to healthcare represent an historic opportunity to improve the lives of people with diabetes. These advances enable more meaningful monitoring of blood glucose values with the facilitation of more optimal insulin dosing and delivery. Newer insulins and delivery systems are in development that seek to mitigate both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia and increase time in range. Information systems now exist that may be leveraged to merge data from previously discrete systems into new models of connected care. This review highlights important developments that serve to increase effectiveness while reducing the burden of diabetes care in the near future.

Novel blood glucose lowering therapies for managing type 1 diabetes in paediatric patients

INTRODUCTION

Therapy for type 1 diabetes (T1D) is mainly restricted to insulin treatment. The management of paediatric patients with T1D should tackle not only glucose control, but also insulin resistance, beta-cell preservation, quality of life and cardiovascular disease risk factors, which are increasingly recognized to occur in adolescents with T1D.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines the recently published literature from PubMed on non-insulin agents for the management of T1D in paediatric patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Few paediatric patients with T1D are achieving their metabolic targets. Current data support the need for new strategies and the consideration of additional therapies that not only may help patients, their families and their physicians to meet HbA1c targets, but also may preserve residual islet mass and good quality of life and prevent microvascular and macrovascular complications, thereby, reducing hypoglycaemic episodes. Non-insulin adjunctive therapies may improve not only glucose control, but also insulin sensitivity, in addition to preserving beta-cell function in T1D patients. Thus, more studies are required to define the potential role of these therapies in the management of paediatric patients.