Left Atrial Myopathy in Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure: Clinical Implications, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Targets

Association of central arterial stiffness with atrial myopathy: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study

Atrial myopathy-defined as abnormal left atrial (LA) size and function-is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and dementia. Central arterial stiffness is associated with increased atrial afterload and fibrosis and may be a risk factor for atrial myopathy. We examined the association of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) with LA function and assessed potential causal relationships. We included 2825 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study participants from Visit 5 (2011-2013). cfPWV was related to echocardiographic LA function continuously per 1-SD and categorically in quartiles. Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was performed using U.K. Biobank-derived genetic variants associated with arterial stiffness index and cardiac magnetic resonance measures of LA function. When analyzed per SD increment (297.6 cm/s), higher cfPWV was significantly associated with lower LA reservoir and conduit strain (β = -0.53%, 95% CI [-0.81, -0.25] and β = -0.46%, 95% CI [-0.68, -0.25], respectively) after adjusting for demographics, clinical characteristics, systolic blood pressure, and left ventricular (LV) morphology and function. In MR analyses there was a non-significant inverse association of arterial stiffness index with LA total, passive, and active emptying fractions. Higher cfPWV is associated with lower LA reservoir and conduit strain, independent of systolic blood pressure and LV morphology and function. No evidence for a causal relationship between arterial stiffness index and alterations in LA function was found. Future studies should examine the prospective association of central arterial stiffness with LA function alterations.

Association of Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Mortality Among Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

BACKGROUND

Current estimates of atrial fibrillation (AF)-associated mortality rely on claims- or clinical-derived diagnoses of AF, limit AF to a binary entity, or are confounded by comorbidities. The objective of the present study is to assess the association between device-recognized AF and mortality among patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices capable of sensitive and continuous atrial arrhythmia detection. Secondary outcomes include relative mortality among cohorts with no AF, paroxysmal AF, persistent AF, and permanent AF.

METHODS

Using the deidentified Optum Clinformatics US claims database (2015 to 2020) linked to the Medtronic CareLink database, we identified individuals with a cardiac implantable electronic device who transmitted data ≥6 months after implantation. AF burden was assessed during the first 6 months after implantation (baseline period). Subsequent mortality, assessed from claims data, was compared between patients with and without AF, with adjustment for age, geographic region, insurance type, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and implantation year.

RESULTS

Of 21 391 patients (age, 72.9±10.9 years; 56.3% male) analyzed, 7798 (36.5%) had device-recognized AF. During a mean of 22.4±12.9 months (median, 20.1 [12.8-29.7] months) of follow-up, the overall incidence of mortality was 13.5%. Patients with AF had higher adjusted all-cause mortality than patients without AF (hazard ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.20-1.39]; P<0.001). Among those with AF, patients with nonparoxysmal AF had the greatest risk of mortality (persistent AF versus paroxysmal AF: hazard ratio, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.18-1.58]; P<.001; permanent AF versus paroxysmal AF: hazard ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.14-1.34]; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

After adjustment for potential confounding factors, the presence of AF was associated with higher mortality in our cohort of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Among those with AF, nonparoxysmal AF was associated with the greatest risk of mortality.

Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Myopathy, and Thromboembolism: The Additive Value of Echocardiography and Possible New Horizons for Risk Stratification

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac sustained arrhythmia, and it is associated with increased stroke and dementia risk. While the established paradigm attributes these complications to blood stasis within the atria and subsequent thrombus formation with cerebral embolization, recent evidence suggests that atrial myopathy (AM) may play a key role. AM is characterized by structural and functional abnormalities of the atria, and can occur with or without AF. Moving beyond classifications based solely on episode duration, the 4S-AF characterization has offered a more comprehensive approach, incorporating patient's stroke risk, symptom severity, AF burden, and substrate assessment (including AM) for tailored treatment decisions. The "ABC" pathway emphasizes anticoagulation, symptom control, and cardiovascular risk modification and emerging evidence suggests broader benefits of early rhythm control strategies, potentially reducing stroke and dementia risk and improving clinical outcomes. However, a better integration of AM assessment into the current framework holds promise for further personalizing AF management and optimizing patient outcomes. This review explores the emerging concept of AM and its potential role as a risk factor for stroke and dementia and in AF patients' management strategies, highlighting the limitations of current risk stratification methods, like the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Echocardiography, particularly left atrial (LA) strain analysis, has shown to be a promising non-invasive tool for AM evaluation and recent studies suggest that LA strain analysis may be a more sensitive risk stratifier for thromboembolic events than AF itself, with some studies showing a stronger association between LA strain and thromboembolic events compared to traditional risk factors. Integrating it into routine clinical practice could improve patient management and targeted therapies for AF and potentially other thromboembolic events. Future studies are needed to explore the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in AM patients with and without AF and to refine the diagnostic criteria for AM.

CMR-based cardiac phenotyping in different forms of heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is a heterogenous disease requiring precise diagnostics and knowledge of pathophysiological processes. Since structural and functional imaging data are scarce we hypothesized that cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-based analyses would provide accurate characterization and mechanistic insights into different HF groups comprising preserved (HFpEF), mid-range (HFmrEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). 22 HFpEF, 17 HFmrEF and 15 HFrEF patients as well as 19 healthy volunteers were included. CMR image assessment contained left atrial (LA) and left ventricular (LV) volumetric evaluation as well as left atrioventricular coupling index (LACI). Furthermore, CMR feature-tracking included LV and LA strain in terms of reservoir (Es), conduit (Ee) and active boosterpump (Ea) function. CMR-based tissue characterization comprised T1 mapping as well as late-gadolinium enhancement (LGE) analyses. HFpEF patients showed predominant atrial impairment (Es 20.8%vs.25.4%, p = 0.02 and Ee 8.3%vs.13.5%, p = 0.001) and increased LACI compared to healthy controls (14.5%vs.23.3%, p = 0.004). Patients with HFmrEF showed LV enlargement but mostly preserved LA function with a compensatory increase in LA boosterpump (LA Ea: 15.0%, p = 0.049). In HFrEF LA and LV functional impairment was documented (Es: 14.2%, Ee: 5.4% p < 0.001 respectively; Ea: 8.8%, p = 0.02). This was paralleled by non-invasively assessed progressive fibrosis (T1 mapping and LGE; HFrEF > HFmrEF > HFpEF). CMR-imaging reveals insights into HF phenotypes with mainly atrial affection in HFpEF, ventricular affection with atrial compensation in HFmrEF and global impairment in HFrEF paralleled by progressive LV fibrosis. These data suggest a necessity for a personalized HF management based on imaging findings for future optimized patient management.

Functional Mitral Regurgitation and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Clinical Implications and Management

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is highly prevalent and associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes. The pathophysiology of HFpEF mostly relies on the development of elevated left ventricle filling pressure, diastolic dysfunction, and atrial dilatation and impairment. This dynamic process may eventually lead to the development of functional mitral regurgitation (MR), characterized by mitral annular dilatation and consequent leaflet remodeling, in the context of preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. These observations highlight the possible common pathophysiology of MR and HFpEF. However, less is known about the prevalence and the clinical value of MR in the context of HFpEF. This review aims to provide an overview of the association and interplay between functional MR and HFpEF, discuss the underlying mechanisms that are common to these diseases, and summarize potential targeted pharmacological treatments.

Left atrial reservoir pressure-volume relations during exercise in healthy older adults

The left atrium (LA) mediates cardiopulmonary interactions. During ventricular systole, the LA functions as a compliant reservoir that is coupled to the left ventricle (LV) and offloads volume from the pulmonary vasculature. We aimed to describe LA reservoir function using phasic relationships between pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) and LA volume events. We included healthy adults (7 M/6 F, 56 ± 8 yr) who were studied at rest and during semirecumbent cycle ergometry at a target of 100 beats/min heart rate. Right heart catheterization was performed to record the PAWP and two-dimensional (2-D) echocardiography was used to measure LA and LV volumes. We manually measured A-wave, x-trough, V-wave, and y-trough PAWP beat-by-beat, as well as minimal, maximal, and precontraction biplane LA volumes. Heart rate increased by 40 ± 7 beats/min with exercise; stroke volume and cardiac output also rose. Although all phasic PAWP measurements increased with exercise, the x-V pressure pulse during LA filling doubled from 4 ± 2 to 8 ± 4 mmHg (P = 0.001). LA minimal volume was unchanged but maximal volume increased from 39 ± 9 to 48 ± 9 mL (P < 0.001) with exercise, and so reservoir volume increased from 24 ± 5 to 32 ± 8 mL (P < 0.001). As such, calculated LA compliance decreased from 6.8 ± 3.4 to 4.8 ± 2.6 mL/mmHg (P = 0.029). The product of V-wave PAWP and LA maximal volume, a surrogate for LA wall stress, increased from 486 ± 193 to 953 ± 457 mmHg·mL (P < 0.001). In healthy older adults during submaximal exercise, the PAWP waveform shifts upward and its amplitude widens, LA filling increases, LA compliance decreases modestly, and LA wall stress may augment substantially.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We combined invasive estimates of left atrial pressure with noninvasive left atrial volume measurements made at rest and during exercise in healthy humans. Left atrial pressure and volume both increased with exercise, though the pressure increase was relatively greater, and calculated compliance decreased modestly while estimated peak wall stress nearly doubled. Our results demonstrate left atrial loading during exercise in healthy older adults and provide insight into how the left atrium mediates cardiopulmonary interactions.

Pathophysiology and clinical relevance of atrial myopathy

Atrial myopathy is a condition that consists of electrical, structural, contractile, and autonomic remodeling of the atria and is the substrate for development of atrial fibrillation, the most common arrhythmia. Pathophysiologic mechanisms driving atrial myopathy are inflammation, oxidative stress, atrial stretch, and neurohormonal signals, e.g., angiotensin-II and aldosterone. These mechanisms initiate the structural and functional remodeling of the atrial myocardium. Novel therapeutic strategies are being developed that target the pathophysiologic mechanisms of atrial myopathy. In this review, we will discuss the pathophysiology of atrial myopathy, as well as diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Associations of Circulating Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 and Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 With Long-Term Cardiac Function

BACKGROUND

Although VCAM-1 (vascular cell adhesion molecule-1) and ICAM-1 (intercellular adhesion molecule-1) have been associated with incident heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF), the associations of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 with sensitive measures of cardiac structure/function are unclear. The objective of this study is to evaluate associations between VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and measures of cardiac structure and function as potential pathways through which cellular adhesion molecules promote HFpEF and AF risk.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis), we evaluated the associations of circulating VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 at examination 2 (2002-2004) with measures of cardiac structure/function on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at examination 5 (2010-2011) after multivariable adjustment. Mediation analysis of left atrial (LA) strain on the association between VCAM-1 or ICAM-1 and AF or HFpEF was also performed. Overall, 2304 individuals (63±10 years; 47% men) with VCAM-1 or ICAM-1, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and covariate data were included in analysis. Higher VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 were associated with lower LA peak longitudinal strain and worse global circumferential left ventricular strain but were not associated with left ventricular myocardial scar or interstitial fibrosis. Lower LA peak longitudinal strain mediated 8% (95% CI, 2-30) of the relationship between VCAM-1 and HFpEF and 9% (95% CI, 2-21) of the relationship between VCAM-1 and AF.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 were associated with lower LA function and left ventricular systolic function but were not associated with myocardial scar or interstitial fibrosis. VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 may promote HFpEF and AF risk through impaired LA reservoir function.

Atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients: Where do we stand in 2023? - State of the art review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure are common overlapping cardiovascular disorders. Despite important therapeutic advances over the past several decades, controversy persists about whether a rate control or rhythm control approach constitutes the best option in this population. There is also considerable debate about whether antiarrhythmic drug therapy or ablation is the best approach when rhythm control is pursued.  A brief historical examination of the literature addressing this issue will be performed. An analysis of several important clinical outcomes observed in the prospective, randomized studies, which have compared AF ablation to non-ablation treatment options, will be discussed. This review will conclude with recommendations to guide clinicians on the status of AF ablation as a treatment option when considering management options in heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation.

Myosin-binding protein H-like regulates myosin-binding protein distribution and function in atrial cardiomyocytes

Mutations in atrial-enriched genes can cause a primary atrial myopathy that can contribute to overall cardiovascular dysfunction. MYBPHL encodes myosin-binding protein H-like (MyBP-HL), an atrial sarcomere protein that shares domain homology with the carboxy-terminus of cardiac myosin-binding protein-C (cMyBP-C). The function of MyBP-HL and the relationship between MyBP-HL and cMyBP-C is unknown. To decipher the roles of MyBP-HL, we used structured illumination microscopy, immuno-electron microscopy, and mass spectrometry to establish the localization and stoichiometry of MyBP-HL. We found levels of cMyBP-C, a major regulator of myosin function, were half as abundant compared to levels in the ventricle. In genetic mouse models, loss of MyBP-HL doubled cMyBP-C abundance in the atria, and loss of cMyBP-C doubled MyBP-HL abundance in the atria. Structured illumination microscopy showed that both proteins colocalize in the C-zone of the A-band, with MyBP-HL enriched closer to the M-line. Immuno-electron microscopy of mouse atria showed MyBP-HL strongly localized 161 nm from the M-line, consistent with localization to the third 43 nm repeat of myosin heads. Both cMyBP-C and MyBP-HL had less-defined sarcomere localization in the atria compared to ventricle, yet areas with the expected 43 nm repeat distance were observed for both proteins. Isometric force measurements taken from control and Mybphl null single atrial myofibrils revealed that loss of Mybphl accelerated the linear phase of relaxation. These findings support a mechanism where MyBP-HL regulates cMyBP-C abundance to alter the kinetics of sarcomere relaxation in atrial sarcomeres.

A review of the impact, pathophysiology, and management of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) have increased mortality and increased risk of stroke. Due to the heterogeneous nature of both disease processes, it is difficult to ascertain whether the diagnosis and progression of AF is the cause of deterioration or if it is a symptom of worsening heart failure. This presents physicians with a clinical conundrum of whether optimizing their heart failure will decrease the overall AF burden or if restoration of sinus rhythm is necessary to optimize patients with HFpEF. In this paper, we will review the impact of AF in patients with HFpEF, the pathophysiology and heterogeneity of HFpEF and AF, and the management of these patients. As HFpEF and AF become more prevalent, managing these disease processes needs standardization to improve outcomes. Further research is needed to understand the complex interplay between AF and HFpEF to help determine the best management strategy.

Aortic Regurgitation and Heart Failure: Advances in Diagnosis, Management, and Interventions

This review discusses the contemporary clinical evaluation and management of patients with comorbid aortic regurgitation (AR) and heart failure (HF) (AR-HF). Importantly, as clinical HF exists along the spectrum of AR severity, the present review also details novel strategies to detect early signs of HF before the clinical syndrome ensues. Indeed, there may be a vulnerable cohort of AR patients who benefit from early detection and management of HF. Additionally, while the mainstay of operative management for AR has historically been surgical aortic valve replacement, this review discusses alternate procedures that may be beneficial in high-risk cohorts.

Electrocardiographic markers of atrial cardiomyopathy and risk of heart failure in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA) cohort

Background

The association of electrocardiographic (ECG) markers of atrial cardiomyopathy with heart failure (HF) and its subtypes is unclear.

Methods

This analysis included 6,754 participants free of clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD), including atrial fibrillation (AF), from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Five ECG markers of atrial cardiomyopathy (P-wave terminal force in V1 [PTFV1], deep-terminal negativity in V1 [DTNV1], P-wave duration [PWD], P-wave axis [PWA], advanced intra-atrial block [aIAB]) were derived from digitally recorded electrocardiograms. Incident HF events through 2018 were centrally adjudicated. An ejection fraction (EF) of 50% at the time of HF was used to classify HF as HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), or unclassified HF. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the associations of markers of atrial cardiomyopathy with HF. The Lunn-McNeil method was used to compare the associations in HFrEF vs. HFpEF.

Results

413 HF events occurred over a median follow-up of 16 years. In adjusted models, abnormal PTFV1 (HR (95%CI): 1.56(1.15-2.13), abnormal PWA (HR (95%CI):1.60(1.16-2.22), aIAB (HR (95%CI):2.62(1.47-4.69), DTNPV1 (HR (95%CI): 2.99(1.63-7.33), and abnormal PWD (HR (95%CI): 1.33(1.02-1.73), were associated with increased HF risk. These associations persisted after further adjustments for intercurrent AF events. No significant differences in the strength of association of each ECG predictor with HFrEF and HFpEF were noted.

Conclusions

Atrial cardiomyopathy defined by ECG markers is associated with HF, with no differences in the strength of association between HFrEF and HFpEF. Markers of atrial Cardiomyopathy may help identify individuals at risk of developing HF.

Impact of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation on Activity Minutes in Patients With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

BACKGROUND

Impaired quality of life due to atrial fibrillation (AF), which often includes decreased activity level, is an indication for ablation. However, the impact of ablation for AF on activity is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of ablation on activity minutes per day using continuous accelerometer data from cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED).

METHODS

Using the Optum® Health Record dataset (2007-2019) linked with the Medtronic CareLink® database, we identified patients who had a CIED with AF detection and accelerometer capabilities. Patients with a device that transmitted heart rhythm and activity data ≥ 3 months prior to- and ≥ 12 months following ablation were included in analysis. The associations between ablation and activity minutes were assessed in each CIED type.

RESULTS

Of 4297 eligible patients who underwent AF ablation, 409 (9.5%) (65% Male, 67.3±9.8 years, 64% paroxysmal AF) were included in analysis. The average AF burden and activity minutes per day pre-ablation were 30.9±37.4% and 175±99 minutes, respectively. Following ablation, relative AF burden decreased by 75.1±53.2% (p<0.001). There was no change in activity minutes per day following ablation in the entire cohort (average change: -0.10±36.2 min, p=0.96). There were also no clinically significant changes in activity minutes post-ablation in subgroups based on CIED, season of ablation, quartile of AF burden change, and quartile of age at the time of ablation.

CONCLUSION

There were no clinically significant changes in activity minutes per day in patients with CIEDs following ablation for AF.

Left atrial strain predicts exercise capacity in heart failure independently of left ventricular ejection fraction

AIMS

We hypothesized that left atrial (LA) remodelling and function are associated with poor exercise capacity as prognostic marker in chronic heart failure (CHF) across a broad range of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred seventy-one patients with CHF were analysed [age 65 ± 11 years, 136 males (80%); 86 heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), 27 heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), 58 heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)]. All patients underwent echocardiography and maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing and were classified according to a prognostic cut-off of peak VO2 (pVO2 ; 14 mL/kg/min). Seventy-seven (45%) patients reached pVO2  < 14 and 94 (55%) pVO2  ≥ 14 mL/kg/min. Between the two groups, there was a considerable difference in both left atrial volume (LAVi, 53 ± 24 vs. 44 ± 18 mL/m2 , P = 0.005) and function (LA reservoir strain 12 ± 5 vs. 20 ± 10%, P < 0.0001). Receiver-operating characteristic curves identified LA reservoir strain (area under the curve: 0.73 [0.65-0.80], P < 0.0001) as strong predictor for impaired pVO2 among all echocardiographic variables; LA reservoir strain < 23% had 37% specificity but a very high sensitivity (96%) in identifying a severely reduced pVO2 . In logistic regression analysis, LA reservoir strain < 23% was associated with a highly increased risk of pVO2  < 14 mL/kg/min (odds ratio 16.0 [4.7-54.6]; P < 0.0001). The multivariate analysis showed that a reduced LA reservoir strain was associated with pVO2  < 14 mL/kg/min after adjustment for age, body mass index (BMI), and clinical variables, that is, New York Heart Association class, atrial fibrillation, haemoglobin, and creatinine (b 0.22 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.12-0.31]; P < 0.0001), and after adjustment for echocardiographic variables, that is, LVEF or left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) (b 0.16 [95% CI 0.08-0.24]; P < 0.0001). Patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF were separately analysed. Among LA reservoir strain, LAVi, LVEF, LVGLS, and TAPSE, LA reservoir strain was the only one significantly associated with pVO2 in all subgroups (after adjustment for sex and BMI, P = 0.003, 0.04, and 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CHF, an impaired LA reservoir function is independently associated with a severely reduced pVO2 . LA dysfunction represents a marker of poor prognosis across LVEF borders in the CHF population.

Cardiovascular Complications of Interatrial Conduction Block: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Interatrial block (IAB) is an electrocardiographic pattern describing the conduction delay between the right and left atria. IAB is classified into 3 degrees of block that correspond to decreasing conduction in the region of Bachmann's bundle. Although initially considered benign in nature, specific subsets of IAB have been associated with atrial arrhythmias, elevated thromboembolic stroke risk, cognitive impairment, and mortality. As the pathophysiologic relationships between IAB and stroke are reinforced, investigation has now turned to the potential benefit of early detection, atrial imaging, cardiovascular risk factor modification, antiarrhythmic pharmacotherapy, and stroke prevention with oral anticoagulation. This review provides a contemporary overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of IAB, with a focus on future directions.

Management and outcomes of atrial fibrillation in 241 healthy children and young adults: Revisiting "lone" atrial fibrillation-A multi-institutional PACES collaborative study

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in healthy children and young adults is rare. Risk of recurrence and treatment efficacy are not well defined.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess recurrence patterns and treatment efficacy in AF.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter cohort study including 13 congenital heart centers was facilitated by the Pediatric & Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES). Patients ≤21 years of age with documented AF from January 2004 to December 2018 were included. Demographics, family and clinical history, medications, electrophysiological study parameters, and outcomes related to the treatment of AF were recorded and analyzed. Patients with contributory diseases were excluded.

RESULTS

In 241 subjects (83% male; mean age at onset 16 years), AF recurred in 94 patients (39%) during 2.1 ± 2.6 years of follow-up. In multivariable analysis, predictors of AF recurrence were family history in a first-degree relative <50 years of age (odds ratio [OR] 1.9; P = .047) and longer PR interval in sinus rhythm (OR 1.1 per 10 ms; P = .037). AF recurrence was similar whether patients began no treatment (39/125 [31%]), began daily antiarrhythmic therapy (24/63 [38%]), or had an ablation at any time (14/53 [26%]; P = .39). Ablating non-AF substrate with supraventricular tachycardia improved freedom from AF recurrence (P = .013).

CONCLUSION

Recurrence of AF in the pediatric population is common, and the incidence of recurrence was not impacted by "no treatment," "medication only," or "ablation" treatment strategy. Ablation of pathways and other reentrant targets was the only intervention that decreased AF recurrence in children and young adults.