Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring in Adult ALL to Determine Therapy

Why Do Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Fare Better Than Adults?

It is a new and exciting time for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). While nearly 50 years ago, only one in nine children with ALL survived with chemotherapy, nowadays nearly 90% of children have a chance of long-term survival. Adults with ALL, as well as the special category of adolescents and young adult (AYA) patients, are catching up with the new developments seen in children, but still their prognosis is much worse. A plethora of factors are regarded as responsible for the differences in treatment response, such as age, ethnicity, disease biology, treatment regimens and toxicities, drug tolerance and resistance, minimal residual disease evaluation, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation timing and socio-economic factors. Taking these factors into account, bringing pediatric-like protocols to adult patient management and incorporating new agents into frontline treatment could be the key to improve the survival rates in adults and AYA.

MRD-Based Therapeutic Decisions in Genetically Defined Subsets of Adolescents and Young Adult Philadelphia-Negative ALL

Simple Summary

In acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), once a complete remission is achieved following induction chemotherapy, the study of submicroscopic minimal residual disease (MRD) represents a highly sensitive tool to assess the efficacy of early chemotherapy courses and predict outcome. Because of the significant therapeutic progress occurred in adolescent and young adult (AYA) ALL, the importance of MRD in this peculiar age setting has grown considerably, to refine individual prognostic scores within different genetic subsets and support specific risk and MRD-oriented programs. The evidence coming from the most recent MRD-based studies and the new therapeutic directions for AYA ALL are critically reviewed according to ALL subset and risk category.

Abstract

In many clinical studies published over the past 20 years, adolescents and young adults (AYA) with Philadelphia chromosome negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph− ALL) were considered as a rather homogeneous clinico-prognostic group of patients suitable to receive intensive pediatric-like regimens with an improved outcome compared with the use of traditional adult ALL protocols. The AYA group was defined in most studies by an age range of 18–40 years, with some exceptions (up to 45 years). The experience collected in pediatric ALL with the study of post-induction minimal residual disease (MRD) was rapidly duplicated in AYA ALL, making MRD a widely accepted key factor for risk stratification and risk-oriented therapy with or without allogeneic stem cell transplantation and experimental new drugs for patients with MRD detectable after highly intensive chemotherapy. This combined strategy has resulted in long-term survival rates of AYA patients of 60–80%. The present review examines the evidence for MRD-guided therapies in AYA’s Ph− ALL, provides a critical appraisal of current treatment pitfalls and illustrates the ways of achieving further therapeutic improvement according to the massive knowledge recently generated in the field of ALL biology and MRD/risk/subset-specific therapy

Practical guidance for the management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the adolescent and young adult population

The outstanding therapeutic progress achieved with modern pediatric regimens in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) led efforts to explore whether a similar treatment approach could be equally effective and safe in older patients, starting initially with older adolescents and young adults (AYA), variably defined in different studies by an age between 15–18 and 25–39 years. Several comparative and noncomparative trials of this type have been carried out during the last two decades, enrolling thousands of patients. Almost without exception, the new strategy improved patients’ outcomes compared with traditional adult treatments in B-lineage and T-lineage Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-negative B-ALL, while the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) led to comparative progress in Ph+ ALL, a former high-risk subset more typically observed in older age groups. At present, highly effective pediatric-based regimens warrant 5-year survival rates of 60–70% in AYA patients. In view of these data, the same approach was progressively extended to older patients, improving the results up to 55 years of age. Issues of treatment compliance and drug-related toxicity have thus far prevented a comparable therapeutic advancement in patients aged >55 years. This critical review updates and summarizes with pertinent examples this global, positive therapeutic change, and examines how to promote further progress with new targeted therapies that include novel immuno-therapeutics and other agents developed against the many molecular dysfunctions detectable in various ALL subsets. Substantial progress is expected to occur soon, bringing AYA survival figures very close to that of children, and also to improve the outcome of ALL at all ages.

Clinician Concepts of Cure in Adult Relapsed and Refractory Philadelphia-Negative B Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Delphi Study

INTRODUCTION

Despite the poor prognosis for adults with relapsed or refractory (RR) Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), long-term survival is possible and may even be considered as "cure".

METHODS

This study used a Delphi panel approach to explore concepts of cure in RR Ph-negative B cell precursor ALL. Ten European experts in this disease area participated in a survey and face-to-face panel meeting.

RESULTS

Findings showed that clinicians conceptualize "cure" as a combination of three broad treatment outcomes that vary depending on the treatment stage: complete remission early in treatment (1-3 months) indicates initial success; eradicating cancer cells (minimal residual disease negative status) consolidates the early clinical response; leukemia-free survival is required in the long term.

CONCLUSIONS

Although such terminology remains contested, clinicians would begin considering "cure" as early as 2 years provided the patient is off therapy, with most considering the term applicable by the third year.

FUNDING

Amgen Inc.

New Approaches to the Management of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Traditional treatment regimens for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia, including allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, result in an overall survival of approximately 40%, a figure hardly comparable with the extraordinary 80% to 90% cure rate currently reported in children. When translated to the adult setting, modern pediatric-type regimens improve the survival to approximately 60% in young adults. The addition of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive disease and the measurement of minimal residual disease to guide risk stratification and postremission approaches has led to additional improvements in outcomes. Relapsed disease and treatment toxicity-sparing no patient but representing a major concern especially in the elderly-are the most critical current issues awaiting further therapeutic advancement. Recently, there has been considerable progress in understanding the disease biology, specifically the Philadelphia-like signature, as well as other high-risk subgroups. In addition, there are several new agents that will undoubtedly contribute to additional improvement in the current outcomes. The most promising agents are monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulators, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, and, to a lesser extent, several new drugs targeting key molecular pathways involved in leukemic cell growth and proliferation. This review examines the evidence supporting the increasing role of the new therapeutic tools and treatment options in different disease subgroups, including frontline and relapsed or refractory disease. It is now possible to define the best individual approach on the basis of the emerging concepts of precision medicine.

Minimal Residual Disease Assessment and Risk-based Therapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

The study of minimal residual disease (MRD) in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) allows a greater refinement of the individual risk classification and is the best support for risk-specific therapy with or without allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Using case-specific sensitive molecular probes or multiparametric flow cytometry on marrow samples obtained from the end of induction until midconsolidation, MRD assays can detect up to 1 leukemic cell of 10,000 total mononuclear cells (sensitivity, 0.01%; ie, ≥10⁴). This cutoff, presently bound to technical limitations and subject to improvement, reflects the individual chemosensitivity and is strongly correlated with treatment outcome. The chance for cure is approximately 70% in the MRD-negative subset but only 20% to 30% in MRD-positive patients, in any diagnostic and risk subset. As shown by prospective trials from Germany, Italy, Spain, and France-Switzerland-Belgium, approximately 50% to 70% of unselected adult patients with Philadelphia-negative ALL achieve and maintain an early MRD response, whereas the remainder do not, including a substantial proportion of clinically standard-risk patients, and require an HCT to avert at least partially the risk of relapse. Along with the diffusion of more effective "pediatric-inspired" chemotherapy programs, the MRD analysis is an integral part of a modern management strategy, guiding the decision process to transplant or not, in which case nonrelapse mortality using HCT in first remission-still 10% to 20%-is totally abolished. The use of new agents such as monoclonal antibodies, small inhibitors, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells is opening a new era of MRD-directed therapies, that will further increase survival rates.

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Adult Philadelphia-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the First Complete Remission in the Era of Minimal Residual Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to discuss the potential role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for Philadelphia-negative (Ph^-) adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1) in the era of minimal residual disease (MRD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Allo-HSCT continues to have a role in the therapy of a selected group of high-risk adult patients with ALL in CR1. Although the clinical significance of MRD has been studied less extensively in adults with ALL than in children, recent studies support its role as the strongest prognostic factor that can identify patients that are unlikely to be cured by standard chemotherapy and benefit from undergoing allo-HSCT. In addition, MRD status both pre- and post-HSCT has been found to correlate directly with the risk of relapse. Currently, the clinical challenge consists on applying MRD and molecular failure to integrate novel agents and immunotherapy to lower MRD before allo-HSCT and to modulate the graft versus leukemia (GVL) effect after transplant.

The assessment and appraisal of regenerative medicines and cell therapy products: an exploration of methods for review, economic evaluation and appraisal

BACKGROUND

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) commissioned a 'mock technology appraisal' to assess whether changes to its methods and processes are needed. This report presents the findings of independent research commissioned to inform this appraisal and the deliberations of a panel convened by NICE to evaluate the mock appraisal.

METHODS

Our research included reviews to identify issues, analysis methods and conceptual differences and the relevance of alternative decision frameworks, alongside the development of an exemplar case study of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for treating acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

RESULTS

An assessment of previous evaluations of regenerative medicines found that, although there were a number of evidential challenges, none was unique to regenerative medicines or was beyond the scope of existing methods used to conceptualise decision uncertainty. Regarding the clinical evidence for regenerative medicines, the issues were those associated with a limited evidence base but were not unique to regenerative medicines: small non-randomised studies, high variation in response and the intervention subject to continuing development. The relative treatment effects generated from single-arm trials are likely to be optimistic unless it is certain that the historical data have accurately estimated the efficacy of the control agent. Pivotal trials may use surrogate end points, which, on average, overestimate treatment effects. To reduce overall uncertainty, multivariate meta-analysis of all available data should be considered. Incorporating indirectly relevant but more reliable (more mature) data into the analysis can also be considered; such data may become available as a result of the evolving regulatory pathways being developed by the European Medicines Agency. For the exemplar case of CAR T-cell therapy, target product profiles (TPPs) were developed, which considered the 'curative' and 'bridging to stem-cell transplantation' treatment approaches separately. Within each TPP, three 'hypothetical' evidence sets (minimum, intermediate and mature) were generated to simulate the impact of alternative levels of precision and maturity in the clinical evidence. Subsequent assessments of cost-effectiveness were undertaken, employing the existing NICE reference case alongside additional analyses suggested within alternative frameworks. The additional exploratory analyses were undertaken to demonstrate how assessments of cost-effectiveness and uncertainty could be impacted by alternative managed entry agreements (MEAs), including price discounts, performance-related schemes and technology leasing. The panel deliberated on the range of TPPs, evidence sets and MEAs, commenting on the likely recommendations for each scenario. The panel discussed the challenges associated with the exemplar and regenerative medicines more broadly, focusing on the need for a robust quantification of the level of uncertainty in the cost-effective estimates and the potential value of MEAs in limiting the exposure of the NHS to high upfront costs and loss associated with a wrong decision.

CONCLUSIONS

It is to be expected that there will be a significant level of uncertainty in determining the clinical effectiveness of regenerative medicines and their long-term costs and benefits, but the existing methods available to estimate the implications of this uncertainty are sufficient. The use of risk sharing and MEAs between the NHS and manufacturers of regenerative medicines should be investigated further.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Combination of IKZF1 deletion and early molecular response show significant roles on prognostic stratification in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients

We retrospectively analyzed the samples collected from 66 patients with Ph⁺ALL enrolled on ChiCTR-TNRC-09000309 clinical trial. CR rate was 95.5%, and estimated 2-year OS and DFS were 51.7 ± 11.7% and 26.9 ± 11.6%, 3-year OS and DFS were 31.6 ± 12.0% and 23.4 ± 11.6%. By combining IKZF1 deletion and early molecular responses, we redefined the patients as low, intermediate, and high risk 3 groups separately. Patients with double negative in IKZF1 and early molecular response experienced significant superior survival, while patients with double positive would have the worst outcome, and patients who were one or the other with IKZF1 deletion or MRD status had intermediate outcome. Significant differences were found among 3 groups in regard to both OS (p < .001) and DFS (p < .001). Our findings suggest that Ph⁺ALL is a heterogeneous group of diseases with significantly different prognosis. Combination of IKZF1 deletion and MRD status enable better risk stratification of patients for assignment to optimal therapeutic strategies.

An update on PCR use for minimal residual disease monitoring in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the first neoplasm where the assessment of early response to therapy by minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring has proven to be a fundamental tool for guiding therapeutic choices. In recent years, thanks to real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), MRD monitoring has further achieved higher levels of sensitivity and standardization. However, some outstanding issues still remain to be addressed and emerging technologies hold the promise of improving MRD detection in ALL patients. Areas covered: Through a comprehensive review of the literature, we analyze the state-of-the-art of molecular MRD assessment in ALL to better understand how, in the upcoming years, some of its limitations could be tackled by emerging molecular technologies. Furthermore, we highlight the future role of molecular MRD monitoring in the context of personalized protocols, taking into account the growing genetic complexity in ALL. Expert commentary: Although new molecular technologies are promising tools for MRD assessment, qPCR still remains the gold standard for evaluating MRD in ALL. High-throughput sequencing and droplet digital PCR allow to identify new prognostic factors and/or MRD targets at diagnosis and to perform earlier MRD evaluations, thereby optimizing patient stratification and earlier MRD-based clinical intervention to improve ALL patient outcomes.

TP53 in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is characterized by a great biological and clinical heterogeneity. Despite most adult patients enter complete hematologic remission after induction therapy only 40% survive five or more years. Over the last 20 years, the definition of an accurate biologic leukemia profile and the minimal residual disease evaluation in addition to conventional risk criteria led to a significant improvement for the risk stratification. The alterations of the oncosuppressor gene TP53, including deletions, sequence mutations and defect in its expression due to regulatory defects, define a new important predictor of adverse outcome. More recently, new drugs have been developed with the aim of targeting p53 protein itself or its regulatory molecules, such as Mdm2, and restoring the pathway functionality. Therefore, TP53 alterations should be considered in the diagnostic work-up to identify high risk ALL patients in need of intensive treatment strategies or eligible for new innovative targeted therapies.

Burkitt lymphoma in adolescents and young adults: management challenges

About one-half of all Burkitt lymphoma (BL) patients are younger than 40 years, and one-third belong to the adolescent and young adult (AYA) subset, defined by an age between 15 and 25-40 years, based on selection criteria used in different reports. BL is an aggressive B-cell neoplasm displaying highly characteristic clinico-diagnostic features, the biologic hallmark of which is a translocation involving immunoglobulin and c-MYC genes. It presents as sporadic, endemic, or epidemic disease. Endemicity is pathogenetically linked to an imbalance of the immune system which occurs in African children infected by malaria parasites and Epstein-Barr virus, while the epidemic form strictly follows the pattern of infection by HIV. BL shows propensity to extranodal involvement of abdominal organs, bone marrow, and central nervous system, and can cause severe metabolic and renal impairment. Nevertheless, BL is highly responsive to specifically designed short-intensive, rotational multiagent chemotherapy programs, empowered by the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab. When carefully applied with appropriate supportive measures, these modern programs achieve a cure rate of approximately 90% in the average AYA patient, irrespective of clinical stage, which is the best result achievable in any aggressive lymphoid malignancy to date. The challenges ahead concern the following: optimization of management in underdeveloped countries, with reduction of diagnostic and referral-for-care intervals, and the applicability of currently curative regimens; the development of lower intensity but equally effective treatments for frail or immunocompromised patients at risk of death by complications; the identification of very high-risk patients through positron-emission tomography and minimal residual disease assays; and the assessment in these and the few refractory/relapsed ones of new monoclonals (ofatumumab, blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin) and new molecules targeting c-MYC and key proliferative steps of B-cell malignancies.

Prognostic impact of pretreatment cytogenetics in adult Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the era of minimal residual disease

BACKGROUND

The introduction of novel prognostic factors such as minimal residual disease (MRD) and genomic profiling has led to the reevaluation of the role of cytogenetics and other conventional factors in risk stratification for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

METHODS

This study assessed the impact of baseline cytogenetics on the outcomes of 428 adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative ALL who were receiving frontline chemotherapy. Three hundred thirty patients (77%) were treated with hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone-based regimens, and 98 (23%) were treated with the augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster regimen.

RESULTS

The median age was 40 years (range, 13-86 years). One hundred eighty-six patients (43%) had diploid cytogenetics, 32 (7%) had complex cytogenetics (defined as ≥ 5 chromosomal abnormalities), 27 (6%) had low hypodiploidy/near-triploidy (Ho-Tr), 24 (6%) had high hyperdiploidy, and 24 (6%) had a mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) rearrangement. Patients with an MLL rearrangement, Ho-Tr, or a complex karyotype had significantly worse relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) than the diploid group. According to a multivariate analysis including all the baseline characteristics and MRD status, Ho-Tr and a complex karyotype were independent predictive factors for worse RFS and OS. Furthermore, survival among all cytogenetic groups was similar, regardless of the treatment received.

CONCLUSIONS

A complex karyotype and Ho-Tr are adverse prognostic factors for adults with ALL independently of the MRD status. These findings suggest that pretreatment cytogenetics remain a valuable prognostic tool in this population. Cancer 2017;123:459-467. © 2016 American Cancer Society.