Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: a unique disease

Targeted Therapies in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancers

OPINION STATEMENT

Low grade serous carcinoma of the ovary has been delineated as a separate entity from its counterpart high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. Molecular profiling has helped to further characterize this disease process and has led to new and exciting treatment options. Surgery has always been a cornerstone of management both in primary and recurrent disease settings. Chemotherapy has been a long-standing backbone of adjuvant treatment, but its efficacy continues to be questioned. Hormonal therapy for upfront and recurrent disease is an effective treatment option with a high response rate and minimal side effects. Newer therapies including MEK, CDK 4/6, and PI3KCA inhibitors have emerged as exciting options for recurrent disease. Ongoing clinical trials will hopefully lead to additional therapeutic opportunities based on novel biomarkers in this disease.

Novel Endocrine Therapeutic Opportunities for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Ovarian Cancer-What Can We Learn from Breast Cancer?

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is a rare ovarian malignancy primarily affecting younger women and is characterized by an indolent growth pattern. It exhibits indolent growth and high estrogen/progesterone receptor expression, suggesting potential responsiveness to endocrine therapy. However, treatment efficacy remains limited due to the development of endocrine resistance. The mechanisms of resistance, whether primary or acquired, are still largely unknown and present a significant hurdle in achieving favorable treatment outcomes with endocrine therapy in these patients. In estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, mechanisms of endocrine resistance have been largely explored and novel treatment strategies to overcome resistance have emerged. Considering the shared estrogen receptor positivity in LGSOC and breast cancer, we wanted to explore whether there are any parallel mechanisms of resistance and whether we can extend endocrine breast cancer treatments to LGSOC. This review aims to highlight the underlying molecular mechanisms possibly driving endocrine resistance in ovarian cancer, while also exploring the available therapeutic opportunities to overcome this resistance. By unraveling the potential pathways involved and examining emerging strategies, this review explores valuable insights for advancing treatment options and improving patient outcomes in LGSOC, which has limited therapeutic options available.

Extrapelvic Endometriosis Mimicking Peritoneal Surface Malignancy: Case Report and a Review of Literature

Extrapelvic endometriosis is a rare presentation of endometriosis with atypical clinical symptoms. It can mimic peritoneal surface malignancy, as well as some abdominal infectious diseases. A 29-year-old Moroccan woman presented with abdominal pain, progressive abdominal distention, and an intermittent inflammatory syndrome. Imaging revealed multiple, progressively growing abdominal cysts. She had elevated tumor markers CA125 and CA19.9. Despite thorough investigation, several differential diagnoses persisted for a long time. Definitive pathological diagnosis could only be established after debulking surgery. Literature review on malignant and benign conditions causing multicystic abdominal distention is provided. When definitive diagnosis is not established, but suspicion for peritoneal malignancy remains, a debulking procedure can be undertaken. Organ preservation can be pursued whenever benign disease is still considered. In case of malignancy, short-term (curative) debulking procedure with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can be proposed.

Investigating the suitability of in vitro cell lines as models for the major subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most fatal gynaecological malignancy, accounting for over 200,000 deaths worldwide per year. EOC is a highly heterogeneous disease, classified into five major histological subtypes-high-grade serous (HGSOC), clear cell (CCOC), endometrioid (ENOC), mucinous (MOC) and low-grade serous (LGSOC) ovarian carcinomas. Classification of EOCs is clinically beneficial, as the various subtypes respond differently to chemotherapy and have distinct prognoses. Cell lines are often used as in vitro models for cancer, allowing researchers to explore pathophysiology in a relatively cheap and easy to manipulate system. However, most studies that make use of EOC cell lines fail to recognize the importance of subtype. Furthermore, the similarity of cell lines to their cognate primary tumors is often ignored. Identification of cell lines with high molecular similarity to primary tumors is needed in order to better guide pre-clinical EOC research and to improve development of targeted therapeutics and diagnostics for each distinctive subtype. This study aims to generate a reference dataset of cell lines representative of the major EOC subtypes. We found that non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) optimally clustered fifty-six cell lines into five groups, putatively corresponding to each of the five EOC subtypes. These clusters validated previous histological groupings, while also classifying other previously unannotated cell lines. We analysed the mutational and copy number landscapes of these lines to investigate whether they harboured the characteristic genomic alterations of each subtype. Finally we compared the gene expression profiles of cell lines with 93 primary tumor samples stratified by subtype, to identify lines with the highest molecular similarity to HGSOC, CCOC, ENOC, and MOC. In summary, we examined the molecular features of both EOC cell lines and primary tumors of multiple subtypes. We recommend a reference set of cell lines most suited to represent four different subtypes of EOC for both in silico and in vitro studies. We also identify lines displaying poor overall molecular similarity to EOC tumors, which we argue should be avoided in pre-clinical studies. Ultimately, our work emphasizes the importance of choosing suitable cell line models to maximise clinical relevance of experiments.

Analysis of Omics Data Reveals Nucleotide Excision Repair-Related Genes Signature in Highly-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer to Predict Prognosis

Most of the high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC) are accompanied by P53 mutations, which are related to the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. This study aims to construct a risk signature based on NER-related genes that could effectively predict the prognosis for advanced patients with HGSOC. In our study, we found that two clusters of HGSOC with significantly different overall survival (OS) were identified by consensus clustering and principal component analysis (PCA). Then, a 7-gene risk signature (DDB2, POLR2D, CCNH, XPC, ERCC2, ERCC4, and RPA2) for OS prediction was developed subsequently based on TCGA cohort, and the risk score-based signature was identified as an independent prognostic indicator for HGSOC. According to the risk score, HGSOC patients were divided into high-risk group and low-risk group, in which the distinct OS and the predictive power were also successfully verified in the GEO validation sets. Then we constructed a nomogram, including the risk signature and clinical-related risk factors (age and treatment response) that predicted an individual’s risk of OS, which can be validated by assessing calibration curves. Furthermore, GSEA showed that the genes in the high-risk group were significantly enriched in cancer-related pathways, such as “MAPK signaling pathway”, “mTOR signaling pathway”, “VEGF signaling pathway” and so on. In conclusion, our study has developed a robust NER-related genes-based molecular signature for prognosis prediction, and the nomogram could be used as a convenient tool for OS evaluation and guidance of therapeutic strategies in advanced patients with HGSOC.

Promising Therapeutic Impact of a Selective Estrogen Receptor Downregulator, Fulvestrant, as Demonstrated In Vitro upon Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Cell Lines

Few studies have reported hormonal agent use in the treatment of low-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (LGSOCs), which are chemoresistant. Considering the need for novel effective therapies, we investigated the hormone receptor expression and hormonal inhibition efficacy in LGSOCs. Using immunohistochemistry, we assessed the estrogen receptor (ER) expression status in 33 cases of histologically confirmed serous ovarian tumors, including 10, 11, and 12 cases of LGSOCs, serous borderline tumors (SBTs), and serous cystadenomas (SCAs), respectively. The genetic background reported in our previous study was used in the current study. MPSC1 cells, which were established from LGSOCs, were used in cell proliferation assays. We observed a higher ER expression in LGSOCs and SBTs than in SCAs (70%, 81%, and 50%, respectively). Thus, LGSOCs and SBTs exhibit higher ER expression than SCAs. Moreover, the PIK3CA mutation positively correlated with ER expression in LGSOCs (p = 0.0113). MPSC1 cells showed low ER expression on Western blotting. MPSC1 cell proliferation was significantly inhibited by fulvestrant (a selective ER downregulator). The activation of ER and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways may play an important role in LGSOC carcinogenesis. ER downregulation with fulvestrant or combination therapy with PI3K inhibitors is a possible novel treatment for patients with LGSOCs.

Association of Anti-EGFR Antibody and MEK Inhibitor in Gynecological Cancer Harboring RAS Mutation: A Case Series

Low-grade serous carcinoma represents a minority of serous carcinoma. Although they have better prognosis than high-grade serous carcinoma, they respond poorly to chemotherapy. Thus, it appears necessary to find other treatments such as targeted therapies. Since RAS or RAF mutations occur frequently in low-grade serous carcinoma and lead to constitutively activated MAPK cascade, MEK inhibition should be effective in the treatment of low-grade serous carcinoma. So, we wanted to evaluate the clinical benefit of MEK inhibitors in the management of advanced-stage low-grade serous carcinoma harboring KRAS or NRAS mutation. We report a case series of three women with advanced-stage low-grade serous carcinoma harboring RAS mutation who had stabilization of their disease during several months under targeted therapy combining anti-EGFR antibody and MEK inhibitor. We performed in vitro experiments, confirming the effectiveness of MEK inhibitor on the KRAS-mutated OVCAR-5 cell line, and the constitutively activation of MAPK cascade in RAS-mutated carcinoma. However, it seems that the anti-EGFR antibody does not provide any additional benefit. After whole exome analysis is carried out on the patient with the shortest response, we observed the appearance of RB1 loss-of-function mutation that could be a mechanism of resistance to MEK inhibitors in RAS- of RAF-mutated cancers. The MEK inhibitor is effective in the advanced stages of low-grade serous carcinoma harboring RAS mutation with acceptable tolerance. RB1 loss could be a mechanism of resistance to MEK inhibitors in RAS-mutated low-grade serous carcinoma.

Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary: The Current Status

Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) of the ovary is a rare histological subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. It has distinct clinical behavior and a specific molecular profile. Compared with high-grade serous carcinoma, this tumor presents at a younger age, has an indolent course, and is associated with prolonged survival. LGSC can arise de novo or originate following a serous borderline tumor (SBT). Pathological differentiation between LGSC and other ovarian carcinoma histological subtypes is fundamental. Several factors might influence the overall outcome, such as the age at diagnosis, current smoking, elevated body mass index, mutational status, hormonal receptors’ expression, and Ki-67 proliferation index. Surgery is the main treatment option in LGSC, and efforts must be maximized to achieve a microscopic residual in metastatic disease. Despite being relatively chemo-resistant, adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard of care in LGSC. Hormonal maintenance therapy after adjuvant chemotherapy results in improved outcomes. Treatment options for disease recurrence include secondary cytoreductive surgery, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, targeted therapy, and clinical trials. Advancements in genomic studies and targeted therapies are expected to change the treatment landscape in LGSC.

Development and Validation of Nomograms to Predict Overall Survival Outcomes in Serous Ovarian Cancer Patients with Satisfactory Cytoreductive Surgery and Chemotherapy

Objective

Nomograms are statistics-based predictive tools that integrate predictive factors. Herein, a nomogram was developed and validated to predict the overall survival (OS) in serous ovarian cancer (SOC).

Methods

Primary SOC patients with satisfactory cytoreductive surgery, chemotherapy, and OS ≥1 month were included in this study. A total of 6957 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database comprised the training group and 1244 patients comprised the external validation group. The nomogram was structured on Cox models and evaluated in both the training and validation groups using consistency index, area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, calibration plots, and risk subgroup classification. Kaplan–Meier curves were plotted to compare the survival outcomes between subgroups. A decision-curve analysis was used to test the clinical value of the nomogram.

Results

Independent factors, including age, tumor grade, and Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, identified by multivariate analysis in the training cohort, were selected for the nomogram. The consistency indexes for OS were 0.689 in the training cohort and 0.639 in the validation cohort. The calibration curves showed good consistency between predicted and actual 3- and 5-year OS. Significant differences were observed in the survival curves of different risk subgroups. The decision-curve analysis indicated that our nomogram was superior to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system.

Conclusion

A nomogram was constructed to predict the long-term OS in SOC and verified in Asians. The accurate predictions facilitated personalized treatments and follow-up strategies.

Hormone maintenance therapy for women with low-grade serous ovarian cancer in the front-line setting: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is a rare form of ovarian cancer that accounts for 5-10% of epithelial ovarian cancers. LGSOCs are difficult to treat as they respond poorly to traditional chemotherapy treatments. This systematic review aims to appraise the literature describing the efficacy of hormone maintenance therapy (HMT) in patients with LGSOC given after cytoreductive surgery.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from inception to November 2020. No language restrictions were applied. Publications describing HMT in the primary setting following cytoreductive surgery with or without chemotherapy in women with LGSOC were included. Publications describing HMT in recurrence, non-LGSOC carcinomas, and in-vitro or animal studies were excluded along with case reports, case series, and conference proceedings. We summarized oncologic outcomes, HMT used, and hormone receptor status where reported. Studies were assessed for risk of bias and quality of evidence.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 14,799 records. Four cohort studies met eligibility criteria. A total of 558 patients were included, of which 127 were treated with HMT. There was significant heterogeneity between studies demonstrated by differences in HMT regimens used, dosing, and study population, leading to various outcomes following treatment with HMT.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of LGSOC remains a challenge. One retrospective study demonstrated improved progression-free survival following HMT for LGSOC, while two others failed to show significant improvements. However, there is limited data available in the literature which restricts the generalizability of these results. Therefore, well-designed, prospective, and randomized trials are needed to confirm the benefit of HMT in patients with this rare subgroup of ovarian cancer.

Differential gene expression identifies a transcriptional regulatory network involving ER-alpha and PITX1 in invasive epithelial ovarian cancer

Background

The heterogeneous subtypes and stages of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) differ in their biological features, invasiveness, and response to chemotherapy, but the transcriptional regulators causing their differences remain nebulous.

Methods

In this study, we compared high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOCs) to low malignant potential or serous borderline tumors (SBTs). Our aim was to discover new regulatory factors causing distinct biological properties of HGSOCs and SBTs.

Results

In a discovery dataset, we identified 11 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between SBTs and HGSOCs. Their expression correctly classified 95% of 267 validation samples. Two of the DEGs, TMEM30B and TSPAN1, were significantly associated with worse overall survival in patients with HGSOC. We also identified 17 DEGs that distinguished stage II vs. III HGSOC. In these two DEG promoter sets, we identified significant enrichment of predicted transcription factor binding sites, including those of RARA, FOXF1, BHLHE41, and PITX1. Using published ChIP-seq data acquired from multiple non-ovarian cell types, we showed additional regulatory factors, including AP2-gamma/TFAP2C, FOXA1, and BHLHE40, bound at the majority of DEG promoters. Several of the factors are known to cooperate with and predict the presence of nuclear hormone receptor estrogen receptor alpha (ER-alpha). We experimentally confirmed ER-alpha and PITX1 presence at the DEGs by performing ChIP-seq analysis using the ovarian cancer cell line PEO4. Finally, RNA-seq analysis identified recurrent gene fusion events in our EOC tumor set. Some of these fusions were significantly associated with survival in HGSOC patients; however, the fusion genes are not regulated by the transcription factors identified for the DEGs.

Conclusions

These data implicate an estrogen-responsive regulatory network in the differential gene expression between ovarian cancer subtypes and stages, which includes PITX1. Importantly, the transcription factors associated with our DEG promoters are known to form the MegaTrans complex in breast cancer. This is the first study to implicate the MegaTrans complex in contributing to the distinct biological trajectories of malignant and indolent ovarian cancer subtypes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08276-8.

A prognostic system for epithelial ovarian carcinomas using machine learning

Introduction

Integrating additional factors into the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system is needed for accurate patient classification and survival prediction. In this study, we tested machine learning as a novel tool for incorporating additional prognostic parameters into the conventional FIGO staging system for stratifying patients with epithelial ovarian carcinomas and evaluating their survival.

Material and methods

Cancer‐specific survival data for epithelial ovarian carcinomas were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Two datasets were constructed based upon the year of diagnosis. Dataset 1 (39 514 cases) was limited to primary tumor (T), regional lymph nodes (N) and distant metastasis (M). Dataset 2 (25 291 cases) included additional parameters of age at diagnosis (A) and histologic type and grade (H). The Ensemble Algorithm for Clustering Cancer Data (EACCD) was applied to generate prognostic groups with depiction in dendrograms. C‐indices provided dendrogram cutoffs and comparisons of prediction accuracy.

Results

Dataset 1 was stratified into nine epithelial ovarian carcinoma prognostic groups, contrasting with 10 groups from FIGO methodology. The EACCD grouping had a slightly higher accuracy in survival prediction than FIGO staging (C‐index = 0.7391 vs 0.7371, increase in C‐index = 0.0020, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0012–0.0027, p = 1.8 × 10⁻⁷). Nevertheless, there remained a strong inter‐system association between EACCD and FIGO (rank correlation = 0.9480, p = 6.1 × 10⁻¹⁵). Analysis of Dataset 2 demonstrated that A and H could be smoothly integrated with the T, N and M criteria. Survival data were stratified into nine prognostic groups with an even higher prediction accuracy (C‐index = 0.7605) than when using only T, N and M.

Conclusions

EACCD was successfully applied to integrate A and H with T, N and M for stratification and survival prediction of epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients. Additional factors could be advantageously incorporated to test the prognostic impact of emerging diagnostic or therapeutic advances.

Pretreatment maximum standardized uptake value in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography as a prognostic factor for ovarian clear cell carcinoma and low-grade serous carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) derived by positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) can be an index of biological tumor aggressiveness, which is assessed using noninvasive tools before the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the pretreatment SUVmax in patients with EOC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the data of patients with EOC who underwent pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT between June 2006 and September 2016. The relationships between pretreatment SUVmax and histological subtypes of EOC were determined. Moreover, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to the pretreatment SUVmax. Risk factors associated with progression or death were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 148 patients, 66 (44.6%), 11 (7.4%), 34 (23.0%), 19 (12.8%), 15 (10.1%), and three (2.0%) were diagnosed with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC), clear cell carcinoma (CCC), endometrioid carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, and others, respectively. The median SUVmax was marginally lower in LGSC (6.80 vs. 10.5; P = 0.059) and significantly lower in CCC (5.92 vs. 10.5; P = 0.001) than in HGSC. A high pretreatment SUVmax (≥9.30) was a prognostic factor for OS in patients with LGSC (P = 0.046). Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that a high SUVmax (≥5.85) was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.046) in patients with CCC. However, a high SUVmax (≥7.77) was a poor predictor of PFS and OS in patients with EOC (P = 0.156 and P = 0.158, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the pretreatment SUVmax is not only an independent predictor of survival in patients with CCC but also a significant predictor of survival in patients with LGSC.

Clinical factors associated with prognosis in low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: experiences at two large academic institutions in Korea and Taiwan

Low-grade ovarian serous carcinoma (LGSOC) has clinical features different from high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) accounting for the majority of epithelial ovarian cancer. Because of its rarity, previous studies have only focused on the high-grade disease without considering the differences between the two subtypes. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the clinical prognostic factors known for HGSOC on survival in patients with LGSOC. Based on the Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, progression-free survival (PFS) was markedly decreased in advanced disease compared with early disease. For stage I, patients with stage IC had poorer survival than those with stage IA and IB regardless of the number of cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. For advanced disease, no gross residual disease after primary cytoreductive surgery was significantly associated with longer PFS when compared with gross residual disease. In multivariate analysis for PFS and overall survival (OS), age, preoperative CA-125, time interval from surgery to chemotherapy, and the number of cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy were not associated with prognosis. Complete cytoreduction was the only independent prognostic factor for PFS (HR 2.45, p = 0.045). Our study revealed that the known prognostic factors in HGSOC did not show any effect on the survival in LGSOC except for FIGO stage and complete cytoreduction.

mRNA expression in low grade serous ovarian cancer: Results of a nanoString assay in a diverse population

OBJECTIVE

Mutations in the MAP kinase pathway (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF) are common in low grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC). The effect of these and other mutations on RNA transcription in this disease is poorly understood. Our objective was to describe patterns of somatic mutations and gene transcription in a racially diverse population with LGSOC.

METHODS

Utilizing an institutional tumor registry, patients with LGSOC were identified and charts were reviewed. RNA was extracted from available tumor tissue. Commercial tumor profiling results were analyzed with PanCancer pathway nanoString mRNA expression data. Along with nanoString n-Solver software, Chi-squared, Fishers Exact, and Cox proportional hazards models were used for statistical analysis, with significance set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

39 patients were identified-20% Black, 43% Hispanic, and 36% non-Hispanic White. 18 patients had commercial somatic DNA test results, and 23 had available tumor tissue for RNA extraction and nanoString analysis. The most common somatic alterations identified was KRAS (11 patients, 61%), followed by ERCC1 and TUBB3 (9 each, 50%). KRAS mutations were less common in smokers (14.3% vs 90.9%, p = 0.002). RNA expression analysis demonstrated a greater than two-fold decrease in expression of HRAS in tumors from older patients (p = 0.04), and a greater than two-fold decrease in the expression of HRAS in recurrent tumors (p = 0.007). No significant differences were seen in somatic testing results, RNA expression analysis, or progression free survival between different racial and ethnic cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Somatic deficiencies in ERCC1, TUBB3, and KRAS are common in LGSOC in a population of minority patients. HRAS demonstrates decreased expression in tumors from older patients and recurrent tumors.

Evaluation of MTAP immunohistochemistry loss of expression in ovarian serous borderline tumors as a potential marker for prognosis and progression

INTRODUCTION

Serous borderline tumors (SBT) are the most common subtype of ovarian borderline tumors with excellent clinical course. However, they can recur or progress to low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) in a small proportion of the cases. Beside BRAF and KRAS mutations, copy number alterations (CNA), particularly loss of chromosome 9p21 locus which results in deletion of genes CDKN2A and MTAP, have been suggested to be involved in disease progression. MTAP immunohistochemistry recently has been introduced for mesothelioma as a reliable surrogate marker for the homozygous deletion of chromosome 9p21 locus. Therefore, in the current study, we aimed to evaluate the MTAP loss of expression in serous borderline tumors and low-grade serous carcinomas to identify if it can be used as a marker for prognosis and progression.

METHOD

Eighty-four total cases of ovarian serous lesions, including 21 cases of serous cystadenomas, 21 cases of serous borderline tumors, 12 cases of low-grade serous carcinomas and 30 cases of high-grade serous carcinomas were selected. MTAP immunohistochemistry was performed on the representative blocks and cytoplasmic staining was used for interpretation. The cases were labeled as positive (retained) if MTAP showed cytoplasmic granular staining and negative (loss of expression) if negative cytoplasmic staining was observed in the presence of positive internal control.

RESULT

Ten of 21 cases of serous borderline tumors showed loss of MTAP expression (48%). Among those, 7 cases were bilateral, 2 cases had micropapillary features, one case had supraclavicular and cervical lymph node involvement by serous borderline tumor and 2 cases had progression to low-grade serous carcinoma, including one of micropapillary tumors. Also 8 out of 12 cases of LGSCs showed MTAP loss of expression (66%). Only 4 of 30 cases of high-grade serous carcinomas (13%) and none of the serous cystadenoma cases showed loss of expression of MTAP.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first description of MTAP immunohistochemistry in serous borderline tumors and low-grade serous carcinomas. Our study was limited due to small sample size. However, it showed an association between MTAP loss of expression and adverse clinical behavior in ovarian serous borderline tumors. This supports the role for further investigations in larger series to evaluate the role of MTAP stain as a prognostic marker in these neoplasms.

Development of new medical treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer recurrence

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the scariest gynaecological cancer. Many advances have been done with evolving knowledge, leading to the introduction of new drugs, most in maintenance setting. The antiangiogenic Bevacizumab and the three approved PARP-inhibitors-olaparib, niraparib and rucaparib-are gradually improving PFS of patients with EOC, with initial effects on OS too. But recurrence is still a heavy sentence and lethality continues to be high. Ovarian cancer is a complex disease, with different clinical presentation, histological aspect, and molecular expression, leading to disappointing results, when using a single drug. Implementation of biobanking and analysis of patients' tumour samples, before starting a treatment, could be a promising way to better understand molecular aspects of this disease, to identify markers predictive of response and to allow a better use of experimental drugs, as immunomodulators, targeted therapies, and combinations of these, to fight tumour growth and clinical progression. We reviewed the literature on the updated treatments for recurrent ovarian cancer, summarizing all the available drugs and combinations to treat patients with this diagnosis, and focusing the attention on the new approved molecules and the contemporary Clinical Trials, investigating new target therapies and new associations.

Does lymph node ratio have any prognostic significance in maximally cytoreduced node-positive low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma?

PURPOSE

To determine the prognostic impact of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in node-positive low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed women with LGSOC who had undergone maximal cytoreduction followed by standard chemotherapy in 11 centers from Turkey during a study period of 20 years. Sixty two women with node-positive LGSOC were identified. LNR was defined as the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) divided by the number of total LNs removed. We grouped patients pursuant to the LNR as LNR ≤ 0.09 and LNR > 0.09. The prognostic value of LNR was investigated by employing the univariate log-rank test and multivariate Cox-regression model.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 45 months, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 61.7% for women with LNR ≤ 0.09 and 32.0% for those with LNR > 0.09 (p = 0.046) whereas, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 72.8% for LNR ≤ 0.09 and 54.7% for LNR > 0.09 (p = 0.043). On multivariate analyses, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (Hazard Ratio [HR] 4.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.88-9.27; p < 0.001), omental involvement (HR 3.48, 95% CI 1.36-8.84; p = 0.009) and LNR > 0.09 (HR 3.51, 95% CI 1.54-8.03; p = 0.003) were adverse prognostic factors for PFS. Additionally, LVSI (HR 6.56, 95% CI 2.33-18.41; p < 0.001), omental involvement (HR 6.34, 95% CI 1.86-21.57; p = 0.003) and LNR > 0.09 (HR 7.20, 95% CI 2.33-22.26; p = 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for decreased OS.

CONCLUSION

LNR > 0.09 seems to be an independent prognosticator for decreased survival outcomes in LGSOC patients who received maximal cytoreduction followed by standard adjuvant chemotherapy.

Do all patients with recurrent ovarian cancer need systemic therapy?

The scientific organizing committee of the 12th International Symposium on Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Optimal Therapy. Update proposed the question regarding whether all patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) need systemic therapy. This article has addressed this question and focused on the clinical scenarios in which the benefits of systemic therapy in patients with ROC are limited, including the frail elderly and patients with multiple medical comorbidities, as well as a subset of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer who have a particularly poor prognosis with a short survival. The challenges of identifying and selecting which patients are unlikely to benefit from systemic therapy were addressed. The benefit of systemic therapy also can be questioned in specific histological subtypes of ROC such as low-grade serous cancers as well as clear cell and mucinous cancers in view of low response rates. Finally, the contentious question regarding the timing of chemotherapy in asymptomatic patients with CA 125 disease progression after response to first-line chemotherapy was addressed and an argument made challenging the current treatment paradigm. Clearly, not all patients with ROC need or should be offered systemic therapy, and ultimately the recommendations need to be based on evidence and communicated in a clear and sensitive manner to patients and their families.

Should We Abandon Systematic Pelvic and Paraaortic Lymphadenectomy in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer?

BACKGROUND

Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is a rare disease that accounts for 5% of all ovarian cancers and requires surgical complete debulking. To date, the prognostic value of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy remains unclear in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort of patients with a diagnosis of LGSOC was registered in the Tumeurs Malignes Rares Gynécologiques national network, between January 2000 and July 2017, at 25 centers. All LGSOC were confirmed after pathological review and operated by primary debulking surgery (PDS) or interval debulking surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT-IDS). Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were included, 86.1% were stage III/IV, and 74.6% underwent lymph node dissection (LND). According to the Completeness of Cancer Resection (CCR) score, 83.7% had complete resection. Median OS was 130 months, and median PFS was 41 months. Pelvic and paraaortic LND had no significant impact on OS (p = 0.78) or DFS (p = 0.93), and this was confirmed in subgroups (advanced stages FIGO III/IV, CCR score 0/1 or 2/3, and timing of surgery PDS or NACT-IDS). Histological positive paraaortic lymph nodes had a significant negative impact on PFS in the whole population (HR 2.21, 1.18-4.39, p = 0.02) and in the CC0/CC1 population (HR, 2.28, 1.13-4.59, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic pelvic and paraaortic LND in patients with LGSOC improved neither overall nor PFS. A prospective trial would be necessary to validate these results but would be difficult to conduct due to the rarity of this disease.

Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC): A Canadian multicenter review of practice patterns and patient outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Patients with advanced low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) have poor long-term survival rates. As a rare histotype, there are uncertainties regarding the use of current therapies. Thus, we studied practice patterns and treatment outcomes as part of a national initiative to better understand and improve the care of women with advanced LGSC.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted in 5 Canadian referral institutions from 2000 to 2016. Data collection and pathology reporting were standardized. Outcome measures included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), progression-free intervals (PFI), and time to next treatment (TTNT). Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the effects of clinical and pathologic factors on outcomes and prognosis.

RESULTS

There were 134 patients (stage II-IV) with a median follow-up of 32.4 months (range 1.6-228). Four primary treatments were compared across institutions: 1) surgery followed by chemotherapy (56%), 2) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by surgery (27%), 3) surgery alone (9%), and 4) surgery followed by anti-hormone therapy (4%). Primary platinum/paclitaxel chemotherapy was used in 81%. Patients treated with NACT had worse PFS. Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified lesser residual disease, younger age, and primary peritoneal origin as variables significantly associated with better OS/PFS (p < 0.03). One institution had significantly better PFS than the others (p = 0.025), but this finding could be related to a higher frequency of primary peritoneal LGSC. PFI and TTNT intervals in patients with relapsed disease were not significantly different after the first relapse irrespective of treatment type.

CONCLUSIONS

There are notable differences in practice patterns across Canada. This underscores the need for ongoing strategies to measure, evaluate and achieve optimal patient outcomes for women with advanced LGSC.

Loss of 1p36.33 Frequent in Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND: Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is a rare subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Limited data regarding the molecular-genetic background exist beyond mutations in the RAS signaling pathway. There is a growing need to better characterize these tumors due to chemoresistance and limited therapeutic options in advanced or recurrent disease. METHODS: We performed genome-wide copy number aberration (CNA) profiles and mutation hotspot screening (KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, ERBB2, PIK3CA, TP53) in 38 LGSOC tumor samples. RESULTS: We detected mutations in the RAS-signaling pathway in 36.8% of cases, including seven KRAS, four BRAF, and three NRAS mutations. We identified two mutations in PIK3CA and one mutation in MAP3K1, EGFR, and TP53. CNAs were detected in 86.5% of cases. None of the focal aberrations was correlated with specific clinical characteristics. The most frequently detected CNA was loss of 1p36.33 in 54.1% of cases, with a trend towards lower progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with 1p36.33 loss. CONCLUSIONS: Activating RAS mutations were dominant in our series, with supplementary detection of two PIK3CA mutations which may lead to therapeutic options. Furthermore, we detected 1p36.33 deletions in half of the cases, indicating a role in tumorigenesis, and these deletions may serve as a prognostic marker.

Ovarian cancer in adolescents and young adults

The diagnosis of ovarian cancer in adolescents and young adults is always challenging. Many issues exist, and most important of these may be access to care with an appropriate provider. A range of histologies occur in the ovaries, and their frequency changes markedly as patients progress from adolescence to young adulthood. The very curable germ cell tumors of adolescence slowly give way to aggressive carcinomas, which require a different treatment approach. Special consideration is needed for treatment of toxicity. In an ideal world, centers consisting of pediatric, medical, and gynecological oncologists may be the most appropriate to care for these complex and diverse patients.

Heterotypic CAF-tumor spheroids promote early peritoneal metastatis of ovarian cancer

The study provides insights in HGSOC by identifying that ascitic CAFs selectively recruit ITGA5^high ascitic tumor cells to form heterotypic spheroids named metastatic units (MUs), which actively engage in peritoneal metastasis, discriminates HGSOC from LGSOC, and act as therapeutic targets in hampering OC metastasis.

High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is hallmarked by early onset of peritoneal dissemination, which distinguishes it from low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC). Here, we describe the aggressive nature of HGSOC ascitic tumor cells (ATCs) characterized by integrin α5^high (ITGA5^high) ATCs, which are prone to forming heterotypic spheroids with fibroblasts. We term these aggregates as metastatic units (MUs) in HGSOC for their advantageous metastatic capacity and active involvement in early peritoneal dissemination. Intriguingly, fibroblasts inside MUs support ATC survival and guide their peritoneal invasion before becoming essential components of the tumor stroma in newly formed metastases. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) recruit ITGA5^high ATCs to form MUs, which further sustain ATC ITGA5 expression by EGF secretion. Notably, LGSOC is largely devoid of CAFs and the resultant MUs, which might explain its metastatic delay. These findings identify a specialized MU architecture that amplifies the tumor–stroma interaction and promotes transcoelomic metastasis in HGSOC, providing the basis for stromal fibroblast-oriented interventions in hampering OC peritoneal propagation.

Epigenetic therapy for ovarian cancer: promise and progress

Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecologic malignancy, with a 5-year survival rate of approximately 47%, a number that has remained constant over the past two decades. Early diagnosis improves survival, but unfortunately only 15% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed at an early or localized stage. Most ovarian cancers are epithelial in origin and treatment prioritizes surgery and cytoreduction followed by cytotoxic platinum and taxane chemotherapy. While most tumors will initially respond to this treatment, recurrence is likely to occur within a median of 16 months for patients who present with advanced stage disease. New treatment options separate from traditional chemotherapy that take advantage of advances in understanding of the pathophysiology of ovarian cancer are needed to improve outcomes. Recent work has shown that mutations in genes encoding epigenetic regulators are mutated in ovarian cancer, driving tumorigenesis and resistance to treatment. Several of these epigenetic modifiers have emerged as promising drug targets for ovarian cancer therapy. In this article, we delineate epigenetic abnormalities in ovarian cancer, discuss key scientific advances using epigenetic therapies in preclinical ovarian cancer models, and review ongoing clinical trials utilizing epigenetic therapies in ovarian cancer.

Low grade serous ovarian carcinoma: identifying variations in practice patterns

Objectives

Low grade serous ovarian carcinoma is a rare subtype of ovarian cancer with an indolent and chemorefractory course. As such, treatment strategies among practitioners are not uniformly known. The primary objective of this study was to identify differences in practice patterns among physicians who treat low grade serous carcinoma.

Methods Materials

A de novo survey was distributed to members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Questions about demographics, management of primary and recurrent disease, and use of consolidation therapy were included. Statistical analyses were performed using χ2 and Fisher’s exact tests.

Results

194 gynecologic oncologists completed the survey. Approximately two-thirds of respondents practiced in a university based setting and treated a high volume of ovarian cancers, including low grade serous carcinoma. 82% recommended somatic testing during treatment and 84% routinely sent patients for genetic counseling. Treatment preferences for primary disease varied by debulking status. 48% of practitioners used hormone antagonism as consolidation after primary treatment. Secondary cytoreduction was preferred for patients with platinum sensitive recurrence and a long disease free interval following primary treatment (P<0.001). Hormone antagonism was the preferred treatment for the first platinum resistant recurrence (54%), while a BRAF inhibitor was the preferred agent in platinum resistant recurrence in the presence of a known BRAF mutation (56%).

Conclusions

There was significant variation in the preferred management of low grade serous carcinoma among practitioners. Further efforts to improve knowledge of this disease, identify optimal treatment modalities, and provide guidelines for management should be encouraged.

Missing information in statewide and national cancer databases: Correlation with health risk factors, geographic disparities, and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to analyze factors associated with outcomes and missing data in women with epithelial ovarian cancer using institutional, state and national databases.

METHODS

Data were abstracted from the University of Virginia cancer registry, Virginia Department of Health (VDH) database, and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program and analyzed for correlations with demographics, cancer characteristics, and outcomes. Statewide spatial associations between health risk factors such as smoking, obesity, and missing grade/stage were evaluated using bivariate LiSA in Geoda.

RESULTS

There were 524 institutional, 3544 VDH, and 44,464 SEER cases of epithelial ovarian cancer. Institutional cases were younger, most often of white race, had increased grade 1, and decreased unknown grade and stage (all p < 0.001). Significant predictors of unknown grade were non-white race, older age, no surgery, unknown stage/stage IV, and unknown histology/adenocarcinoma. Unknown grade correlated with a significant survival disadvantage. Missing stage and grade correlated with county-level obesity and smoking, as rural regions in Southwest and Southside Virginia had high rates of health risk factors and missing stage/grade compared to urban, affluent regions in Northern Virginia.

CONCLUSIONS

Over a third of nationally reported cases have an unknown grade and 10-20% have an unknown stage which correlates with the worst survival. Predictors of unknown grade include insurance, age, race, smoking status, obesity, and rural setting. Missing data may represent geographical differences or disparities in cancer care available as significantly fewer cases had an unknown grade/stage at a tertiary academic medical center compared to VDH and SEER.

Impact of lympho-vascular space invasion on tumor characteristics and survival outcome of women with low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To examine association of lympho-vascular space invasion (LVSI) with clinico-pathological factors and to evaluate survival of women with low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma containing areas of LVSI.

METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective study examining consecutive cases of surgically treated stage I-IV low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (n = 178). Archived histopathology slides for the ovarian tumors were reviewed, and LVSI was scored as present or absent. LVSI status was correlated to clinico-pathological findings and survival outcome.

RESULTS

LVSI was seen in 79 cases (44.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 37.1-51.7). LVSI was associated with increased risk of omental metastasis (87.0% vs 64.9%, odds ratio [OR] 3.62, P = 0.001), high pelvic lymph node ratio (median 12.9% vs 0%, P = 0.012), and malignant ascites (49.3% vs 32.6%, OR 2.01, P = 0.035). On multivariable analysis, controlling for age, stage, and cytoreductive status, presence of LVSI in the ovarian tumor remained an independent predictor for decreased progression-free survival (5-year rates 21.0% vs 35.7%, adjusted-hazard ratio 1.57, 95%CI 1.06-2.34, P = 0.026). LVSI was significantly associated with increased risk of recurrence in lymph nodes (OR 2.62, 95%CI 1.08-6.35, P = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

LVSI in the ovarian tumor is associated with adverse clinico-pathological characteristics and decreased progression-free survival in women with low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

Expression of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis-related hormone receptors in low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSC)

Background

The aim of our study was to investigate the clinical features and expression levels of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis-related hormone receptors in low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSC).

Methods

We retrospectively investigated the clinical features of 26 consecutive patients with LGSC who underwent primary staging or debulking surgery between April 2005 and June 2013 in our center; concomitant primary high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) patients were randomly selected at a 2:1 ratio for comparison. Tissue microarrays were constructed from the LGSC and HGSC specimens, and the expression levels of six hormone receptors in the hypothalamic pituitary-gonadal axis were analyzed by immunohistochemistry.

Results

The median (range) age of patients with LGSC was 54 (27–77) years. According to the FIGO staging system, the cases were distributed as follows: stage I, 6 (23.1%); stage II, 0 (0%); stage III, 19 (73.1%); and stage IV, 1 (3.8%). The 2-year and 5-year overall survival rates for LGSC were 91.8% and 67.5%, respectively. The expression levels of the hormone receptors were as follows: ER, 80.8%; PR, 34.6%; AR, 53.8%; FSHR, 84.0%; LHR, 65.4%; and GnRHR, 100%. Hormone receptor-positive patients had a better prognosis compared with hormone receptor-negative patients, but the difference was not significant.

Conclusions

Our study presented a higher overall survival rate and distinctive hormone receptor expression levels of LGSC patients compared with the HGSC cohort. Patients with positive hormone receptor expression tended to have a better prognosis than the corresponding hormone receptor negative patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13048-016-0300-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Mechanisms and Targets Involved in Dissemination of Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian carcinoma is associated with the highest death rate of all gynecological tumors. On one hand, its aggressiveness is based on the rapid dissemination of ovarian cancer cells to the peritoneum, the omentum, and organs located in the peritoneal cavity, and on the other hand, on the rapid development of resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. In this review, we focus on the metastatic process of ovarian cancer, which involves dissemination of, homing to and growth of tumor cells in distant organs, and describe promising molecular targets for possible therapeutic intervention. We provide an outline of the interaction of ovarian cancer cells with the microenvironment such as mesothelial cells, adipocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and other stromal components in the context of approaches for therapeutic interference with dissemination. The targets described in this review are discussed with respect to their validity as drivers of metastasis and to the availability of suitable efficient agents for their blockage, such as small molecules, monoclonal antibodies or antibody conjugates as emerging tools to manage this disease.

Molecular profiling of low grade serous ovarian tumours identifies novel candidate driver genes

Low grade serous ovarian tumours are a rare and under-characterised histological subtype of epithelial ovarian tumours, with little known of the molecular drivers and facilitators of tumorigenesis beyond classic oncogenic RAS/RAF mutations. With a move towards targeted therapies due to the chemoresistant nature of this subtype, it is pertinent to more fully characterise the genetic events driving this tumour type, some of which may influence response to therapy and/or development of drug resistance. We performed genome-wide high-resolution genomic copy number analysis (Affymetrix SNP6.0) and mutation hotspot screening (KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, HRAS, ERBB2 and TP53) to compare a large cohort of ovarian serous borderline tumours (SBTs, n = 57) with low grade serous carcinomas (LGSCs, n = 19). Whole exome sequencing was performed for 13 SBTs, nine LGSCs and one mixed low/high grade carcinoma. Copy number aberrations were detected in 61% (35/57) of SBTs, compared to 100% (19/19) of LGSCs. Oncogenic RAS/RAF/ERBB2 mutations were detected in 82.5% (47/57) of SBTs compared to 63% (12/19) of LGSCs, with NRAS mutations detected only in LGSC. Some copy number aberrations appeared to be enriched in LGSC, most significantly loss of 9p and homozygous deletions of the CDKN2A/2B locus. Exome sequencing identified BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, USP9X and EIF1AX as the most frequently mutated genes. We have identified markers of progression from borderline to LGSC and novel drivers of LGSC. USP9X and EIF1AX have both been linked to regulation of mTOR, suggesting that mTOR inhibitors may be a key companion treatment for targeted therapy trials of MEK and RAF inhibitors.

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: A review

Epithelial ovarian cancers can be divided into the more common, aggressive type II cancers and the less common, slow-growing type I cancers. Under this model, serous ovarian carcinomas can be subdivided into high-grade (type II) and low-grade (type I) tumours. The two-tier system for grading serous ovarian carcinomas is superior to more detailed grading systems in terms of predicting survival. Low-grade serous carcinomas typically present in young women and have a relatively good prognosis, despite being resistant to chemotherapy. Low-grade serous cancers have a high prevalence of KRAS and BRAF mutations, but a low prevalence of TP53 mutations (which are characteristic of high-grade serous cancers). Among women with low-grade serous ovarian cancer, the presence of a KRAS/BRAF mutation is a favorable prognostic factor. Studies of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitor in low-grade serous ovarian cancer suggest that identifying MAPK mutations might eventually be useful in guiding treatment.

Low-grade epithelial ovarian cancer: a number of distinct clinical entities?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this study is to summarize the contemporary understanding of low-grade epithelial ovarian cancers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer is biologically distinct from high-grade serous ovarian cancer. It is associated with a high incidence of K-RAS and B-RAF mutations. Although described as indolent due to median progression-free and overall survivals of 20 and 99 months, respectively, with a median age of diagnosis of 43 years, it accounts for a significant number of patient-years lost. Retrospective studies suggest response rates of 5% for chemotherapy and 9% for antioestrogen therapy. A prospective study of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitor selumetinib (response rate 15%) and retrospective bevacizumab studies suggest that these may be more effective approaches.Limited retrospective clinical data and even more sparse molecular data suggest that similar distinctions may exist between low-grade endometrioid and mucinous ovarian cancers and their respective high-grade counterparts, but more research is required in order to clarify the biological differences and the implications that these have for management.

SUMMARY

The results of phase III mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitor studies in low-grade serous ovarian cancer and further clinical and biological assessment of low-grade endometrioid and mucinous ovarian cancers are urgently required.

Operability and chemotherapy responsiveness in advanced low-grade serous ovarian cancer. An analysis of the AGO Study Group metadatabase

OBJECTIVE

Since almost two decades standard 1st-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) has been a platinum/taxane combination. More recently, this general strategy has been challenged because different types of AOC may not benefit homogenously. Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is one of the candidates in whom efficacy of standard chemotherapy should be revised.

METHODS

This study is an exploratory case control study of the AGO-metadatabase of 4 randomized phase III trials with first-line platinum combination chemotherapy without any targeted therapy. Patients with advanced FIGO IIIBIV low-grade serous ovarian cancer were included and compared with control cases having high-grade serous AOC.

RESULTS

Out of 5114 patients in this AGO database 145 (2.8%) had LGSOC and of those thirty-nine (24.1%) had suboptimal debulking with post-operative residual tumor >1cm, thus being eligible for response evaluation. An objective response was observed in only 10 patients and this 23.1% response rate (RR) was significantly lower compared to 90.1% RR in the control cohort of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) (p<0.001). Both, LGSOC and HGSOC patients who underwent complete cytoreduction had significantly better progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in comparison to those with residuals after primary surgery, accordingly (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our observation indicates that low-grade serous cancer is not as responsive to platinum-taxane-based chemotherapy as high-grade serous AOC. In contrast, surgical debulking showed a similar impact on outcome in both types of AOC thus indicating different roles for both standard treatment modalities. Systemic treatment of low grade serous AOC urgently warrants further investigations.

Obesity is associated with worse overall survival in women with low-grade papillary serous epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate prognostic risk factors for survival in women with low-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer (LGSC).

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with LGSC was conducted. Potential epidemiologic risk factors evaluated included obesity, age, parity, race, smoking, oral contraceptive pill and/or hormonal replacement therapy use, and previous hysterectomy or surgery on fallopian tubes and/or ovaries. Additional factors included stage, extent of debulking, residual disease, and disease status.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients were identified, and pathologic diagnosis was independently confirmed. Median age at diagnosis was 56 years (range, 21-86 years). Thirty-four percent were obese, and 80% had optimally debulked disease. Forty-six percent were alive, 14% with disease, whereas 25% were dead of disease, 2% died of intercurrent disease, and 27% had an unknown status. In a univariate analysis, optimal surgical debulking was associated with improved progression-free survival (P = 0.01), disease-specific survival (P = 0.03), and overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001) and body mass index with worse OS (P = 0.05). On multivariate analysis, obesity (hazard ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-7.3; P = 0.04) and optimal tumor debulking (hazard ratio, 0.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.008-0.29; P = 0.001) were a significant predictor of OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In a multivariate analysis, obesity and optimal tumor cytoreduction were significant predictors of OS. However, obesity was not associated with worse disease-specific survival, suggesting that mortality of obese patients with LGSC may result from other comorbidities. Interventions addressing obesity may improve survival for women diagnosed with LGSC, and further study is warranted to address the role of obesity in LGSC.

Intratumoral heterogeneity in a minority of ovarian low-grade serous carcinomas

Background

Ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) has fewer mutations than ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) and a less aggressive clinical course. However, an overwhelming majority of LGSC patients do not respond to conventional chemotherapy resulting in a poor long-term prognosis comparable to women diagnosed with HGSC. KRAS and BRAF mutations are common in LGSC, leading to clinical trials targeting the MAPK pathway. We assessed the stability of targetable somatic mutations over space and/or time in LGSC, with a view to inform stratified treatment strategies and clinical trial design.

Methods

Eleven LGSC cases with primary and recurrent paired samples were identified (stage IIB-IV). Tumor DNA was isolated from 1–4 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor blocks from both the primary and recurrence (n = 37 tumor and n = 7 normal samples). Mutational analysis was performed using the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq^TM Cancer Panel, with targeted validation using Fluidigm-MiSeq, Sanger sequencing and/or Raindance Raindrop digital PCR.

Results

KRAS (3/11), BRAF (2/11) and/or NRAS (1/11) mutations were identified in five unique cases. A novel, non-synonymous mutation in SMAD4 was observed in one case. No somatic mutations were detected in the remaining six cases. In two cases with a single matched primary and recurrent sample, two KRAS hotspot mutations (G12V, G12R) were both stable over time. In three cases with multiple samplings from both the primary and recurrent surgery some mutations (NRAS Q61R, BRAF V600E, SMAD4 R361G) were stable across all samples, while others (KRAS G12V, BRAF G469V) were unstable.

Conclusions

Overall, the majority of cases with detectable somatic mutations showed mutational stability over space and time while one of five cases showed both temporal and spatial mutational instability in presumed drivers of disease. Investigation of additional cases is required to confirm whether mutational heterogeneity in a minority of LGSC is a general phenomenon that should be factored into the design of clinical trials and stratified treatment for this patient population.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-982) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus review for ovarian and primary peritoneal low-grade serous carcinomas

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer is a recently described histological subtype of ovarian cancer that is clinically and molecularly distinct from the 4 other main histological subtypes (high-grade serous, clear cell, endometrioid, and mucinous). In particular, it differs from high-grade serous ovarian cancer in that it presents at a much younger age, is more indolent, and is relatively chemoresistant. Very few clinical trials have been performed exclusively in this tumor type; and as such, specific data guiding optimal management are limited.

A survival analysis comparing women with ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma to those with high-grade histology

Ovarian low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) and high-grade serous carcinoma have distinct molecular profiles, clinical behaviors, and treatment responses. The survival advantage for patients with low-grade carcinoma compared with patients with high-grade histology remains controversial. We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of 381 patients with ovarian serous carcinoma at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from 2007 to 2010. Patients were classified into two groups according to MD Anderson two-tier system: 35 (9.2%) cases with LGSC and 346 with high-grade serous carcinoma. Patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer had a significantly younger age at diagnosis (46 versus 56 years, P=0.046), and their median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival values were 35.0 and 54.0 months, respectively. A multivariate analysis showed that, for serous ovarian cancer, the histological grade was a significant prognostic factor for PFS but not for overall survival (P=0.022 and P=0.0566, respectively). When stratified by the existence of a residual disease, patients with low-grade disease who underwent cytoreductive surgery without macroscopic residual disease (>1 cm) had a significantly improved median PFS time (36.0 months) compared with that of patients with high-grade carcinoma who received optimal cytoreductive surgery (16.0 months, P=0.017). Conversely, patients with low-grade and high-grade carcinoma who were left with macroscopic residue (>1 cm) experienced a similarly shorter median PFS (10.0 and 13.0 months, respectively, P=0.871). The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage and residual disease were significant prognostic factors of low-grade carcinoma, while positive ascites was associated with a worse PFS value. Our data showed that LGSC is a different entity from high-grade carcinoma and that LGSC was associated with improved PFS after optimal cytoreductive surgery but not suboptimal operation.

The prognostic significance of pre- and post-treatment CA-125 in grade 1 serous ovarian carcinoma: a gynecologic Oncology Group study

OBJECTIVES

The study objective was to determine the prognostic significance of serum CA-125 levels in patients with grade 1 serous ovarian carcinoma (SOC) enrolled in a Phase III study.

METHODS

An ancillary analysis of a phase III study of women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated with carboplatin/paclitaxel versus triplet or sequential doublet regimens. Grade 1 SOC was used as a surrogate for low-grade serous carcinoma.

RESULTS

Among 3686 enrolled patients, 184 (5%) had grade 1 disease and CA-125 levels available. For those with grade 1 SOC, the median patient age was 56.5; 87.3% had Stage III disease. Median follow-up was 102 months and there was no difference in pre-chemotherapy CA-125 by treatment arm (P=0.91). Median pretreatment CA-125 for those with grade 1 SOC was lower (119.1) than for patients with grade 2-3 SOC (246.7; P<0.001). In those with grade 1, pretreatment CA-125 was not prognostic of outcome. However, patients with CA-125 levels that normalized after cycle 1, 2 or 3 were 60-64% less likely to experience disease progression as compared to those who never normalized or normalized after 4 cycles (P ≤ 0.024). Normalization of CA-125 levels before the second cycle was negatively associated with death, with a HR of 0.45 (P=0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment CA-125 level was significantly lower in women with grade 1 SOC compared to those with high-grade SOC. While pretreatment CA-125 was not associated with survival, serial CA-125 measurements during chemotherapy treatment were prognostic, with normalization before the second chemotherapy cycle associated with a decreased risk of death.

Cyberknife radiotherapy and anastrozole for the treatment of advanced progressive low-grade papillary serous ovarian carcinoma: A case report

•

Low-grade papillary serous ovarian carcinoma has unique epidemiologic and disease-specific characteristics

•

Cyberknife radiotherapy is a unique treatment that may successfully be used to treat unresectable disease

•

Anastrozole is an effective treatment for hormone receptor-positive low-grade papillary serous ovarian carcinoma

Survival in women with grade 1 serous ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To examine clinicopathologic variables associated with survival among women with low-grade (grade 1) serous ovarian carcinoma enrolled in a phase III study.

METHODS

This was an ancillary data analysis of Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 182, a phase III study of women with stage III-IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with triplet or sequential doublet regimens. Women with grade 1 serous carcinoma (a surrogate for low-grade serous disease) were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 3,686 enrolled participants, 189 had grade 1 disease. The median age was 56.5 years and 87.3% had stage III disease. The median follow-up time was 47.1 months. Stratification according to residual disease after primary surgery was microscopic residual in 24.9%, 0.1-1.0 cm of residual in 51.3%, and more than 1.0 cm of residual in 23.8%. On multivariate analysis, only residual disease status (P=.006) was significantly associated with survival. Patients with microscopic residual had a significantly longer median progression-free (33.2 months) and overall survival (96.9 months) compared with those with residual 0.1-1.0 cm (14.7 months and 44.5 months, respectively) and more than 1.0 cm of residual disease (14.1 months and 42.0 months, respectively; progression-free and overall survival, P<.001). After adjustment for other variables, patients with low-grade serous carcinoma with measurable residual disease had a similar adjusted hazard ratio for death (2.12; P=.002) as their high-grade serous carcinoma counterparts with measurable disease (2.31; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical cytoreduction to microscopic residual was associated with improved progression-free and overall survival in women with advanced-stage low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00011986.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Proteomic Analysis of Matched Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Specimens in Patients with Advanced Serous Ovarian Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The biology of high grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) is poorly understood. Little has been reported on intratumoral homogeneity or heterogeneity of primary HGSOC tumors and their metastases. We evaluated the global protein expression profiles of paired primary and metastatic HGSOC from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples.

METHODS

After IRB approval, six patients with advanced HGSOC were identified with tumor in both ovaries at initial surgery. Laser capture microdissection (LCM) was used to extract tumor for protein digestion. Peptides were extracted and analyzed by reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to a linear ion trap mass spectrometer. Tandem mass spectra were searched against the UniProt human protein database. Differences in protein abundance between samples were assessed and analyzed by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for select proteins from the original and an additional validation set of five patients was performed.

RESULTS

Unsupervised clustering of the abundance profiles placed the paired specimens adjacent to each other. IHC H-score analysis of the validation set revealed a strong correlation between paired samples for all proteins. For the similarly expressed proteins, the estimated correlation coefficients in two of three experimental samples and all validation samples were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The estimated correlation coefficients in the experimental sample proteins classified as differentially expressed were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

A global proteomic screen of primary HGSOC tumors and their metastatic lesions identifies tumoral homogeneity and heterogeneity and provides preliminary insight into these protein profiles and the cellular pathways they constitute.

The diagnostic utility of TP53 and CDKN2A to distinguish ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma from low-grade serous ovarian tumors

Low-grade serous carcinomas and serous borderline tumors, combined herein and referred to as low-grade serous tumors, show distinct molecular alterations and clinical behaviors compared with high-grade serous carcinomas. The discrimination between low-grade serous tumors and high-grade serous carcinomas can be challenging on small tissue samples, such as cell blocks of paracentesis fluid or biopsies from omental disease. The purpose of this study was to test the ability of TP53 and CDKN2A immunohistochemistry to distinguish between high-grade serous carcinomas and low-grade serous tumors on small tissue samples. Tissue microarrays containing 582 high-grade serous carcinomas, 45 low-grade serous carcinomas, and 49 serous borderline tumors, confirmed by contemporary histopathological review, were stained for TP53 and CDKN2A (DO7 and E6H4 antibody clones, respectively). TP53 was scored as completely absent, wild-type pattern or overexpressed (>60%), and CDKN2A was scored as either negative/patchy (<90%) or block expression (>90%). The combination of the two markers, ie, the TP53 wild-type pattern and CDKN2A patchy expression, had sensitivity for low-grade serous tumors of 89%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 68%, and a negative predictive value of 98%. These markers can, therefore, be used on small biopsies/cell blocks to refute a diagnosis of low-grade serous tumors. These findings may inform emerging neoadjuvant therapeutic strategies in advanced ovarian cancers and may be crucial for future clinical trials on molecular-based therapies.

Expression of BRAF V600E mutant protein in epithelial ovarian tumors

BACKGROUND

Genetic analyses have identified BRAF V600E mutations in a subset of ovarian carcinomas. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of BRAF V600E aberrant protein using a novel mutation-specific antibody in epithelial ovarian tumors.

METHODS

We immunohistochemically analyzed expression of V600E-mutant BRAF protein in archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens of 142 epithelial ovarian tumors [98 invasive carcinomas and 44 tumors of low malignant potential (LMP)] using monoclonal antibody VE1. BRAF mutation status was validated in all immunopositive cases and in 6 immunonegative control cases by gene sequencing.

RESULTS

We found anti-BRAF V600E immunolabeling in 4 serous carcinomas and 5 serous LMP. Presence of a BRAF V600E mutation was confirmed by sequencing analysis in 6 of the 9 cases (3 LMP tumors, 3 low-grade carcinomas). In 2 partially VE1-positive tumors deriving from 1 patient (1 LMP and 1 contralateral invasive high-grade serous carcinoma), genetic analysis repeatedly resulted in BRAF wild-type, arguing for false-positive immunostaining results. One immunopositive case was repeatedly inconclusive in genetic analysis. In all 6 genetically confirmed cases, BRAF V600E mutant protein expression was homogenous throughout the tumor tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

We found BRAF V600E mutations in 13% (4/31) of serous LMP and 5% (3/62) of invasive serous carcinomas. No BRAF V600E mutations were detected in nonserous epithelial ovarian tumors. For reliable assessment of the BRAF V600E status in ovarian epithelial tumor samples, an integrated approach using immunohistochemistry and genetic analysis seems advisable, as both methods lead to incorrect results in some cases.

[Update on gynecopathology]

Recent years have witnessed significant achievements in light microscopic, immunohistochemical and molecular diagnostics in gynecopathology. In this article four topics will be discussed as examples. The squamous precancerous and carcinomatous lesions of the female anogenital tract and the cervix are caused by a transforming high risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. No differences in morphological findings can be found between the different locations. In contrast to the current WHO classification a new categorization into low grade and high grade precancerous lesions is suggested. Only some cervical adenocarcinomas are related to high risk HPV infection. Nevertheless, some of these unusual variants demonstrate p16 overexpression. Uterine leiomyosarcomas are clinically aggressive neoplasms independent of the histological grade and in most cases curative treatment is not feasible. It is most important to distinguish leiomyosarcoma from those leiomyoma variants which mimic uterine leiomyosarcoma. Pelvic and ovarian serous carcinomas can be separated into low grade and high grade types which differ significantly in formal pathogenesis, molecular features and pathomorphological findings. Significant differences are also obvious in clinical behavior and response to chemotherapy regimens.

Architectural patterns of ovarian/pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma

We describe the architectural patterns of advanced ovarian/pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas that have been treated with upfront surgery, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by interval debulking to explore the association with the chemotherapeutic response. For 70 cases of advanced (i.e. stage III/IV) high-grade serous carcinomas (33 platinum resistant/intermediate, 37 platinum sensitive; 24 neoadjuvantly treated, 44 primary surgery), all tumor-containing histologic slides were reviewed by 1 of 3 pathologists. Histologic type was confirmed and the following features were assessed: major architectural pattern and the presence of any of 8 predefined minor architectural patterns (papillary, transitional cell carcinoma-like, micropapillary, microcystic, nested papillary, slit-like, glandular, solid). A semiquantitative assessment of psammoma bodies, histiocytic response, necrosis, nuclear atypia, and single-cell invasion was performed. Mitotic count was performed in 10 HPF and 1 HPF was counted for intraepithelial lymphocytes. The morphologic features were tested for an association with previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy and response to chemotherapy (resistant/intermediate versus chemotherapy-sensitive cases stratified by neoadjuvant chemotherapy), which was carried out using χ tests for categorical variables and analysis of variance for continuous data. Combinations of features were analyzed using unsupervised clustering (Wald). Although 8 of 18 features were significantly different when samples from neoadjuvantly treated patients were compared with those not previously treated, no individual histomorphologic feature or a combination of features was associated with response to chemotherapy. Further subtyping of high-grade serous carcinomas will likely need ancillary molecular markers that may have a greater potential to identify cases that will not respond to platinum-based chemotherapy.