Rehabilitation Needs for Patients Undergoing CAR T-Cell Therapy

Malnutrition and cachexia are associated with poor CAR T-cell therapy outcomes including survival

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a revolutionary treatment for patients with refractory or relapsed B-cell malignancies. However, a significant proportion of patients experience negative outcomes, including severe inflammatory toxicities and relapse. Cachexia and malnutrition are known secondary syndromes in many cancer patients, attributed to the effects of active malignancy, systemic inflammation, and cumulative treatment burden; however, further research is required to accurately characterise these issues in CAR T-cell patients. The aims of this service evaluation were to explore the changes in nutritional status (malnutrition and cachexia) in CAR T-cell therapy patients and the potential impact on patient outcomes including survival. Additionally, we describe the utilisation of dietetic resources in this specific patient population in a London tertiary referral centre.

METHODS

Adult haematology patients receiving licensed CD19-targeting CAR T-cell therapy at University College London Hospital between 01/04/19 and 01/09/21 were included. Data were collected from the time of treatment consent, and throughout admission to day of discharge: body weight (BW), C-reactive protein, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, nutrition-risk screening scores (hospital-specific) and dietetic input. Clinical outcomes such as 12-month all-cause mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, high-grade toxicities, and length of hospital stay (LoS) were also recorded. Cachexia and malnutrition were defined using the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) consensus, respectively.

RESULTS

114 patients (55.6 ± 15.1 years; 57% males) with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 109) and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (n = 5), receiving axicabtagene ciloleucel (n = 89) and tisagenlecleucel (n = 25) were included. Median LoS for treatment was 34 (27-38) days. Prior to treatment, 31.5% of patients developed malnutrition, with pre-cachexia/refractory cachexia (mGPS) identified in 43.6% of patients. This altered nutritional status pre-treatment was significantly associated with adverse patient outcomes post-infusion; mGPS was independently associated with inferior overall survival (HR = 3.158, CI = 1.36-7.323, p = 0.007), with malnutrition and mGPS associated with increased LoS (p = 0.037), sepsis (p = 0.022) and ICU admission (p = 0.039). During admission, patients experienced significant BW loss (-5.6% (-8.8 to -2.4); p=<0.001), with 68.4% developing malnutrition. Malnutrition screening during admission identified 57% patients at-risk, with 66.6% of patients referred to dietetics; however, there was a lack of malnutrition screening and dietetic referrals prior to treatment.

CONCLUSION

Pre-treatment malnutrition and cachexia was significantly associated with adverse CAR T patient outcomes, including mGPS cachexia status independently associated with inferior overall survival. Further research in this novel space is essential to confirm the extent and impact of nutritional issues, to assist with implementing dietetic pathways, and to identify potential interventions with a view to optimising outcomes.

Management of Bone Disease with Concurrent Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy for Multiple Myeloma

In the intricate landscape of multiple myeloma, a hematologic malignancy of plasma cells, bone disease presents a pivotal and often debilitating complication. The emergence of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has marked a pivotal shift in the therapeutic landscape, offering novel avenues for the management of MM, particularly for those with relapsed or refractory disease. This innovative treatment modality not only targets malignant cells with precision but also influences the bone microenvironment, presenting both challenges and opportunities in patient care. In this comprehensive review, we aim to examine the multifaceted aspects of bone disease in patients with multiple myeloma and concurrent CAR-T therapy, highlighting its clinical ramifications and the latest advancements in diagnostic modalities and therapeutic interventions. The article aims to synthesize current understanding of the interplay between myeloma cells, CAR-T cells, and the bone microenvironment in the context of current treatment strategies in this challenging and unique patient population.

CAR-NK cell therapy in AML: Current treatment, challenges, and advantage

Over the last decade, discovery of novel therapeutic method has been attention by the researchers and has changed the therapeutic perspective of hematological malignancies. Although NK cell play a pivotal role in the elimination of abnormal and cancerous cells, there are evidence that NK cell are disarm in hematological malignancy. Chimeric antigen receptor NK (CAR-NK) cell therapy, which includes the engineering of NK cells to detect tumor-specific antigens and, as a result, clear of cancerous cells, has created various clinical advantage for several human malignancies treatment. In the current review, we summarized NK cell dysfunction and CAR-NK cell based immunotherapy to treat AML patient.

Brexucabtagene autoleucel for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma in the United Kingdom: A real-world intention-to-treat analysis

Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) is an autologous CD19 CAR T-cell product, approved for relapsed/refractory (r/r) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In ZUMA-2, brexu-cel demonstrated impressive responses in patients failing ≥2 lines, including a bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with an overall and complete response rate of 93% and 67%, respectively. Here, we report our real-world intention-to-treat (ITT) outcomes for brexu-cel in consecutive, prospectively approved patients, from 12 institutions in the United Kingdom between February 2021 and June 2023, with a focus on feasibility, efficacy, and tolerability. Of 119 approved, 104 underwent leukapheresis and 83 received a brexu-cel infusion. Progressive disease (PD) and/or manufacturing (MF) were the most common reasons for failure to reach harvest and/or infusion. For infused patients, best overall and complete response rates were 87% and 81%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 13.3 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) for infused patients was 21 months (10.1-NA) with a 6- and 12-month PFS of 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71-89) and 62% (95% CI, 49-73), respectively. ≥Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity occurred in 12% and 22%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, inferior PFS was associated with male sex, bulky disease, ECOG PS > 1 and previous MF. Cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 6%, 15%, and 25% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, and mostly attributable to infection. Outcomes for infused patients in the UK are comparable to ZUMA-2 and other real-world reports. However, ITT analysis highlights a significant dropout due to PD and/or MF. NRM events warrant further attention.

Remission after CAR T-cell therapy: Do lymphoma patients recover a normal life?

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T cells) can induce prolonged remission in a substantial subset of patients with relapse/refractory lymphoma. However, little is known about patients' life after CAR T-cell therapy. We prospectively assessed the multidimensional recovery of lymphoma patients in remission, before leukapheresis, before CAR T-cell infusion, and 3, 6, and 12 months thereafter. Validated tools were used to measure lymphoma-related and global health-related quality of life (HRQoL; Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma [FACT-Lym] and EQ-5D-5L), cognitive complaint (FACT-Cognition), fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue subscale), psychological status (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Post-Traumatic Check List Scale), and sexuality (Relationship and Sexuality Scale). Beyond 12 months of remission, we also surveyed physical, professional, sexual, and general life status. At 3, 6, and 12 months, 53, 35, and 23 patients were evaluable, respectively. Improvement in lymphoma-related HRQoL was clinically relevant at 3, 6, and 12 months with a mean change from baseline of 10.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.8; 16.1), 12.2 (95% CI: 4.2; 20.1), and 11.72 (95% CI: 2.06; 21.38), respectively. Improvement in global HRQoL, fatigue, and anxiety was clinically relevant, but 20%-40% of patients experienced persistent fatigue, psychological distress, and cognitive complaints over time. Beyond 12 months after CAR T cells, 81.8% of 22 evaluable patients were satisfied with their daily life. Physical activity, professional, sexual, and global well-being had returned to prediagnosis levels in nearly half of the patients. We found an improvement in HRQoL after CAR T-cell therapy including anxiety, depression, sexual satisfaction, and general well-being. However, not all patients recover a "normal life." Further research is needed to determine which patients are at risk of quality-of-life impairment to improve recovery after CAR T-cell infusion.

The Patient Symptom Experience After Tisagenlecleucel and Lisocabtagene Maraleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy for Lymphoma

OBJECTIVES

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell treatment is associated with several unique toxicities, and the short-term symptom trajectory in the immediately after therapy is well-documented. However, little is known about patients' long-term symptom experience. The study aimed to elicit the symptom experience of adult patients in remission after CAR T-cell therapy for B cell lymphoma.

DATA SOURCES

A qualitative descriptive design with thematic analysis was utilized. Recruitment occurred at a tertiary academic medical center using the following inclusion criteria: adult recipient of CAR T-cell therapy for B-cell lymphoma between 3 and 12 months prior to enrollment, and currently in remission. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcripts were inductively coded, and team members met weekly to ensure rigor. The final sample included 10 patients: Seven received tisagenlecleucel and three received lisocabtagene marleucel and were a median of 169 days post-infusion and 65 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants continued to report symptoms, including fatigue, neuropathy, low endurance, insomnia, memory problems, and pain. Most symptoms improved over time. Some symptoms interfered with social activities, work, driving, and physical activity, though participants reported that most symptoms existed prior to CAR T-cell therapy, and overall, found CAR T-cell therapy acceptable.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Patients in remission after CAR T-cell therapy often continue to experience symptoms. Nurses should continue to assess this growing patient population and determine if patients require additional symptom management or support. Further research is needed to understand long-term symptom trajectory and associations with prior lines of therapy and CAR T-cell therapy.

Long-term survivorship care after CAR-T cell therapy

While cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome are well-recognized acute toxicities of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, these complications have become increasingly manageable by protocolized treatment algorithms incorporating the early administration of tocilizumab and corticosteroids. As CAR-T cell therapy expands to new disease indications and the number of long-term survivors steadily increases, there is growing recognition of the need to appropriately evaluate and manage the late effects of CAR-T cell therapy, including late-onset or persistent neurotoxicity, prolonged cytopenias, delayed immune reconstitution and infections, subsequent malignancies, organ dysfunction, psychological distress, and fertility implications. In this review, we provide a practical approach to the long-term survivorship care of the CAR-T cell recipient, with a focus on the optimal strategies to address the common and challenging late complications affecting this unique population.

Supportive care for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide clear guidance to health professionals delivering chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy on the best supportive management throughout the CAR-T pathway, from referral to long-term follow-up, including psychosocial aspects.

RECENT FINDINGS

CAR-T therapy has changed the treatment landscape for relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell malignancy. Approximately 40% of r/r B-cell leukaemia/lymphoma patients receiving CD19-targeted CAR-T therapy achieve durable remission following a single dose. The field is rapidly expanding to encompass new CAR-T products for indications such as multiple myeloma, mantle cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma, and the number of patients eligible to receive CAR-T therapy is likely to continue to grow exponentially. CAR-T therapy is logistically challenging to deliver, with involvement of many stakeholders. In many cases, CAR-T therapy requires an extended inpatient hospital admission, particularly in older, comorbid patients, and is associated with potentially severe immune side effects. Further, CAR-T therapy can lead to protracted cytopenias that can last for several months accompanied by a susceptibility to infection.

SUMMARY

For the reasons listed above, standardised, comprehensive supportive care is critically important to ensure that CAR-T therapy is delivered as safely as possible and that patients are fully informed of the risks and benefits, as well as the requirement for extended hospital admission and follow-up, to fully realise the potential of this transformative treatment modality.

How I treat refractory CRS and ICANS after CAR T-cell therapy

The clinical use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is growing rapidly because of the expanding indications for standard-of-care treatment and the development of new investigational products. The establishment of consensus diagnostic criteria for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), alongside the steady use of both tocilizumab and corticosteroids for treatment, have been essential in facilitating the widespread use. Preemptive interventions to prevent more severe toxicities have improved safety, facilitating CAR T-cell therapy in medically frail populations and in those at high risk of severe CRS/ICANS. Nonetheless, the development of persistent or progressive CRS and ICANS remains problematic because it impairs patient outcomes and is challenging to treat. In this case-based discussion, we highlight a series of cases of CRS and/or ICANS refractory to front-line interventions. We discuss our approach to managing refractory toxicities that persist or progress beyond initial tocilizumab or corticosteroid administration, delineate risk factors for severe toxicities, highlight the emerging use of anakinra, and review mitigation strategies and supportive care measures to improve outcomes in patients who develop these refractory toxicities.

Rehabilitation of patients after CAR T-cell therapy. Experiences on 5 patients

OBJECTIVE

CAR T-cell therapy is an effective treatment for various relapsed or refractory haemato-oncological diseases. However, this therapy results in significant immunosuppression that lasts for months. Whether these patients are at risk during a rehabilitation stay, e.g., due to infections, has not yet been answered.

METHODS

We describe the rehabilitation stay under special hygienic conditions of the five patients rehabilitated in our clinic after CAR T-cell therapy. Complications that occurred during rehabilitation are reported, as well as the positive effects of rehabilitation on physical performance, polyneuropathic complaints, anxiety and depression, and individual limitations.

RESULTS

One patient reported signs of infection already at the beginning of rehabilitation. This was treated with antibiotics, and rehabilitation could be continued. No complications occurred in any of the other patients. All patients reported having benefited physically and psychologically from the rehabilitation, and two expressed the intention to return to work.

CONCLUSIONS

As far as we know, this is the first report on several patients after CAR T-cell therapy. Based on the limited data, there is no reason to withhold a rehabilitation stay from patients after CAR T-cell therapy.

Fitness and frailty in myeloma

As the aging population grows, so too does the number of well-tolerated antimyeloma therapies. Physicians will see an increasing volume of patients for subsequent lines of therapy, which could now extend this relationship for over a decade. For younger patients, treatment choices are infrequently impacted by concerns of fitness, but instead about effecting the deepest, most durable response. Older adults, in contrast, are more likely to experience under- than overtreatment, and therefore more objective (and ideally straightforward) ways to evaluate their fitness and ability to tolerate therapy will increasingly assist in decision-making. Post hoc analyses categorizing the fitness of trial patients in the modern treatment era globally demonstrate that even in highly selected populations, those that are recategorized as less fit or frail are consistently at higher risk of inferior outcomes and increased toxicities. Real-world data are comparatively lacking but do demonstrate that most patients with myeloma are not representative of those enrolled on clinical trials, generally more heavily burdened by comorbidities and more likely to be categorized as "less than fit." Simultaneously, the number of therapeutic options open to patients in the relapsed setting continues to grow, now including T-cell engagers and cellular therapies, with their unique toxicity profiles. The aim of this review is to summarize the available data, highlight some of the approaches possible to easily assess fitness and how results might inform treatment selection, and illustrate ways that patients' condition can be optimized rather than lead to exclusion from the more complex therapies newly available.