Headache in Resource-Limited Settings

Preliminary External Validation Results of the Artificial Intelligence-Based Headache Diagnostic Model: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study

The misdiagnosis of headache disorders is a serious issue, and AI-based headache model diagnoses with external validation are scarce. We previously developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based headache diagnosis model using a database of 4000 patients' questionnaires in a headache-specializing clinic and herein performed external validation prospectively. The validation cohort of 59 headache patients was prospectively collected from August 2023 to February 2024 at our or collaborating multicenter institutions. The ground truth was specialists' diagnoses based on the initial questionnaire and at least a one-month headache diary after the initial consultation. The diagnostic performance of the AI model was evaluated. The mean age was 42.55 ± 12.74 years, and 51/59 (86.67%) of the patients were female. No missing values were reported. Of the 59 patients, 56 (89.83%) had migraines or medication-overuse headaches, and 3 (5.08%) had tension-type headaches. No one had trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias or other headaches. The models' overall accuracy and kappa for the ground truth were 94.92% and 0.65 (95%CI 0.21-1.00), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F values for migraines were 98.21%, 66.67%, 98.21%, and 98.21%, respectively. There was disagreement between the AI diagnosis and the ground truth by headache specialists in two patients. This is the first external validation of the AI headache diagnosis model. Further data collection and external validation are required to strengthen and improve its performance in real-world settings.

Treatment Patterns for and Characteristics of Headache in Children and Adolescents Aged 6-17 Years in Japan: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis of Health Insurance Claims Data

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prescription patterns for patients aged 6-17 years with headaches in the REZULT database.

METHODS

We cross-sectionally investigated (Study 1) the pattern of prescription and the proportion of triptan overprescription (≥30 tablets/90 d of triptans) among patients diagnosed with headaches in 2020. Next, we longitudinally studied patients (Study 2) for more than two years from the initial headache diagnosis (July 2010 to April 2022). The number of prescribed tablets was counted every 90 days.

RESULTS

In Study 1, headache diagnoses were assigned to 62,568 of 543,628 (11.51%) patients, and 1524 of 62,568 (2.44%) patients received acute medication. Single nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and triptans were prescribed to 620/624 (99.36%) and 5/624 (0.80%) of patients aged 6-11 years, respectively, and 827/900 (91.89%) and 91/900 (10.11%) of patients aged 12-17 years, respectively. Triptan overprescription was observed in 11/96 (11.46%) patients, and 5/11 (45.45%) of those patients received prophylactic medication. In Study 2, 80,756/845,470 (9.55%) patients aged 6-17 years were diagnosed with headaches that persisted for at least two years. Over two years, 44/80,756 (0.05%) patients were overprescribed triptans, and 3408/80,756 (4.22%) patients were prescribed prophylaxis on at least one occasion.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on real-world data, the appropriate use of prophylactic treatment is still problematic. Overprescription of triptans was observed, although the number of patients was small.

Treatment patterns and characteristics of headache in patients in Japan: A retrospective cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of health insurance claims data

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to investigate prescription patterns for patients aged over 17 years with headaches in the REZULT database.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study (Study 1) of the proportion of over-prescription of acute medications (≥30 tablets/90 days for triptans, combination non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and multiple types; ≥45 tablets/90 days for single NSAIDs) among patients with headache diagnosed in 2020. We longitudinally studied (Study 2) patients for >2 years from initial headache diagnosis (July 2010 to April 2022). The number of prescribed tablets was counted every 90 days.

RESULTS

In Study 1, headache was diagnosed in 200,055 of 3,638,125 (5.5%) patients: 13,651/200,055 (6.8%) received acute medication. Single NSAIDs were prescribed to 12,297/13,651 (90.1%) patients and triptans to 1710/13,651 (12.5%). Over-prescription was found in 2262/13,651 (16.6%) patients and 1200/13,651 (8.8%) patients received prophylactic medication. In Study 2, 408,183/6,840,618 (6.0%) patients were first diagnosed with headaches, which persisted for ≥2 years. Over time, the proportion of patients over-prescribed acute medications increased. Over 2 years, 37,617/408,183 (9.2%) patients were over-prescribed acute medications and 29,313/408,183 (7.2%) patients were prescribed prophylaxis at least once.

CONCLUSIONS

According to real-world data, prophylaxis remains poorly prescribed, and both acute and prophylactic treatment rates for headaches have increased over time.

Developing an artificial intelligence-based diagnostic model of headaches from a dataset of clinic patients' records

OBJECTIVE

We developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based headache diagnosis model using a large questionnaire database from a headache-specializing clinic.

BACKGROUND

Misdiagnosis of headache disorders is a serious issue and AI-based headache diagnosis models are scarce.

METHODS

We developed an AI-based headache diagnosis model and conducted internal validation based on a retrospective investigation of 6058 patients (4240 training dataset for model development and 1818 test dataset for internal validation) diagnosed by a headache specialist. The ground truth was the diagnosis by the headache specialist. The diagnostic performance of the AI model was evaluated.

RESULTS

The dataset included 4829/6058 (79.7%) patients with migraine, 834/6058 (13.8%) with tension-type headache, 78/6058 (1.3%) with trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, 38/6058 (0.6%) with other primary headache disorders, and 279/6058 (4.6%) with other headaches. The mean (standard deviation) age was 34.7 (14.5) years, and 3986/6058 (65.8%) were female. The model's micro-average accuracy, sensitivity (recall), specificity, precision, and F-values for the test dataset were 93.7%, 84.2%, 84.2%, 96.1%, and 84.2%, respectively. The diagnostic performance for migraine was high, with a sensitivity of 88.8% and c-statistics of 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.87-0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Our AI model demonstrated high diagnostic performance for migraine. If secondary headaches can be ruled out, the model can be a powerful tool for diagnosing migraine; however, further data collection and external validation are required to strengthen the performance, ensure the generalizability in other outpatients, and demonstrate its utility in real-world settings.

Headache disorders and relevant sex and socioeconomic patterns in adolescents and young adults across 204 countries and territories: an updated global analysis

BACKGROUND

Primary headache disorders are a group of highly prevalent and disabling neurological diseases that mainly consist of migraine and tension-type headache (TTH). A previous study showed that the burden of headaches peaked at a working age that ranged from 15 to 49, particularly among females, affecting their productivity and severely damaging their social interactions.

METHODS

The latest dataset was retrieved from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2019. Three indicators, including prevalence, incidence, and years lived with disability (YLDs), were adopted for evaluation. The overall and specific headache burdens were fully compared and analysed at global, regional, and national levels. The ratio of female YLD rates to male YLD rates due to headaches was calculated to estimate the sex pattern. Finally, we utilized the two-tailed Spearman test to explore the potential association between socioeconomic background and headaches among young people.

RESULTS

Globally, for overall headache disorders, a total of 2,049,979,883 prevalent cases (95% uncertainty interval (UI): 1,864,148,110 to 2,239,388,034), 601,229,802 incident cases (95% UI: 530,329,914 to 681,007,934), and 38,355,993 YLDs (95% UI: 7,259,286 to 83,634,503) were observed for those aged 10 to 54 in 2019. Sex differences were widely found for all headache types among adolescents and young adults, especially migraine. However, the most interesting finding was that the associations we tested between the socioeconomic environment and young headache patients were positive, regardless of region or specific country or territory.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the global burden of headaches in adolescents and young adults largely increased from 1990 to 2019. Although slight declines were observed in sex differences, they remained significant and challenging. The positive correlations between headache and socioeconomic background among young people were relatively inconsistent with previous investigations, and several related hypotheses were proposed for explanation. Interdisciplinary actions involving education, policy- and law-making, and basic medical practice are desperately needed to further fight against the headache burden, promote gender equality in headache care, and eliminate the stigmatization of headache patients in student and working groups.

Barriers to headache care in low- and middle-income countries

Headache disorders are a common cause of disability globally and lead not only to physical disability but also to financial strain, higher rates of mental health disorders such as depression and anxiety, and reduced economic productivity which negatively impacts gross domestic product (GDP) on a national scale. While data about headache are relatively scarce in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), those available suggest that headache disorders occur on a similar scale in LMICs as they do in high-income countries. In this manuscript, we discuss common clinical, political, economic and social barriers to headache care for people living in LMICs. These barriers, affecting every aspect of headache care, begin with community perceptions and cultural beliefs about headache, include ineffective headache care delivery systems and poor headache care training for healthcare workers, and extend through fewer available diagnostic and management tools to limited therapeutic options for headache. Finally, we review potential solutions to these barriers, including educational interventions for healthcare workers, the introduction of a tiered system for headache care provision, creation of locally contextualized diagnostic and management algorithms, and implementation of a stepped approach to headache treatment.

Headache: Treatment update

Primary headache disorders in particular migraine are one of the most common causes of disability worldwide. Given the high burden of migraine in terms of disability, there has been an effort to develop migraine specific therapies that has led to the availability of new drugs including 5HT_1F receptor agonists-ditans (lasmiditan), small molecule calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonists-gepants: (ubrogepant, rimegepant, atogepant) and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab and eptinezumab). However, some of these treatments incur a high cost and may not be a feasible option for most patients in resource limited settings. Lasmiditan and the gepants are a good option for patients with moderate-severe migraine attacks who cannot use triptans due variously to poor tolerability, or cardio- or cerebrovascular disease. For practical purposes, the new anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies are best reserved for patients who have failed to have efficacy or had intolerable side effects from multiple traditional oral preventives.

Headache education and management in Cameroon: a healthcare provider study

Headache disorders are the most prevalent neurological conditions in the Sub-Saharan Africa and the second cause of disability. In this study, we analyze the knowledge about headache disorders and their management among Cameroonian healthcare providers. We conducted an interventional study with a prospective cohort design. Cameroonian health care providers from the whole country were invited. The evaluation was based on a questionnaire that was done before and after a 4-day educational course. The study included 42 participants, 52.4% female, aged 36.8 years. Participants treated a median of 240 monthly patients. Headache was reported as the most frequent neurological condition in their clinics (34%). Mean number of neurological patients seen per week was 69.3, among them 20 were headache patients. At baseline, only 35.8% correctly mentioned at least one primary headache, increasing to 78.6% after the course (p = 0.002). Secondary headaches were correctly identified by 19.0% at baseline and 40.5% after the course (p = 0.01). Clinical history was considered sufficient for headache diagnosis by 57.1% before and 78.6% after (p = 0.5). Correct red flags were mentioned at baseline by only 14.3% of participants, increasing to 40.5% after the course (p = 0.005). At baseline, the preferred symptomatic was paracetamol (47.6%) and Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (9.5%), changing to 23.8 and 66.7% after the course (p = 0.05 and < 0.001). Headache was reported as the most frequent neurological disorders. Knowledge about primary headache disorders and their etiology was scarce, and the clinical concept of red flags was limited. The acute drug of choice was paracetamol.

The status and high risk factors of severe psychological distress in migraine patients during nCOV-2019 outbreak in Southwest China: a cross-sectional study

Background

Psychological distress is highly prevalent among migraineurs during public health emergencies. The coronavirus disease 2019 (nCOV-2019) has created mass panic in China due to its highly contagious by contact and aerosols and lack of effective treatment. However, the emotion status of migraineurs stayed unclear during the nCOV-2019 outbreak.

Objective

To understand psychological distress of migraineurs by comparing with common population and identify potential high-risk factors of severe psychological distress among migraine patients.

Method

We enrolled the migraineurs treated at the department of Neurology of West China Hospital and healthy controls with age- and sex-matched to migraineurs. Data on clinicodemographics and psychological distress in the month of February 2020 (during in the nCOV-2019 outbreak in China) were collected. We used the Kessler 6-item (K-6) scale to assess psychological distress. Potential risk factors of severe psychological distress were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

Results

The 144 migraineurs and 150 controls were included in the study. Migraineurs showed significantly higher K-6 scores than controls (P < 0.001). Migraine attack frequency in previous 30 days and time spent paying attention to outbreak showed significant in multivariate logistic regression with respective odds ratios of 2.225 (95%CI 1.361–3.628, P = 0.001) and 1.589 (95% 1.117–2.26, P = 0.01).

Conclusion

During public health outbreaks, healthcare professionals should focus not only on controlling and reducing migraine attack but also on mental health of migraineurs, especially those with high frequency migraine attack.

Prevalence and comorbidity of migraine headache: results from the Singapore Mental Health Study 2016

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Migraine is a highly prevalent and disabling neurological disorder associated with a wide range of psychiatric comorbidities. Studies have revealed that those with migraine headache and coexisting psychiatric disorders have poorer treatment outcomes and increased disability. The study aims to establish the prevalence, correlates, and comorbidities of migraine headache among the multi-ethnic Asian population in Singapore.

METHOD

Data were extracted from the Singapore Mental Health Study 2016 (SMHS 2016), a cross-sectional epidemiological survey of a nationally representative sample. Face-to-face interviews were completed with 6126 participants between 2016 and 2017. The data relating to chronic medical conditions, psychiatric conditions, and 30-day functioning and disability were captured using the World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) version 3.0.

RESULTS

The lifetime prevalence for migraine headache in the Singapore general population was 8.2%. Malay ethnicity (versus Chinese), female gender (versus male), and diploma holders (versus university) were significantly more likely to experience migraine headache. Participants belonging to the older age group (65 years and above versus 18-34 years of age), and those who were economically inactive (versus employed) were less likely to experience migraine headache. The mean age of onset for migraine was 26.4 years (SD = 11.1). Poisson regression analyses showed that migraine headache was also significantly associated with psychiatric conditions such as major depressive disorder (MDD) (prevalence ratio (PR), 1.80; 95% CI, 1.25-2.58), bipolar disorder (BD) (PR, 3.55; 95% CI, 2.29-5.51), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) (PR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.12-3.69), obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) (PR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.49-3.26), and alcohol use disorder (AUD) (PR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.20-3.08). Those with migraine headache were significantly associated with poor functioning and disability compared to those without migraine headache.

CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION

Our study showed significant associations between migraine headache and psychiatric disorders, as well as with role functioning and disability. The findings of our study emphasise the need for screening for psychiatric comorbidity among those with migraine and the development of appropriate interventions for this group.

Chronic migraine headache and multiple dental pathologies causing cranial pain for 35 years: the neurodental nexus

We report a case that illustrates how chronic migraine headaches and multiple dental pathologies caused severe and long-standing cranial pain that affected the quality of life of a man for more than 35 years. His case was investigated at several settings including the neurology outpatient clinic of the hospital without a definitive diagnosis or resolution. After investigations, multiple oral pathologies including two occult dental abscesses were diagnosed. Once both affected teeth and associated abscesses were surgically removed, with subsequent antibiotic therapy the headaches resolved.

Vancouver Declaration on Global Headache Patient Advocacy 2018

BACKGROUND

Headache disorders comprise the three most prevalent medical disorders globally and contribute almost 20% to the total burden of neurologic illness. Although the experience of a recurrent headache disorder tends to be highly individualized, patient preferences tend to be a low priority in guidelines for the management of patients with headache.

METHODS

In September 2017, the first Global Patient Advocacy Summit was convened, bringing together patients, patient advocates, patient advocacy organizations, healthcare professionals, pharmaceutical manufacturers, scientists, and regulatory agencies to advance issues of importance to patients affected by headache worldwide.

RESULTS

Presentations and discussion covered multiple issues, such as improving access to appropriate medical care; incorporating the insights of independent patient advocates and advocacy organizations; leveraging the insights, experience and influence of leading health and neurological organizations; and raising awareness of the role of regulatory agencies in disease advocacy. Attendees agreed that it is important to understand and promote the global, regional, and local interests of people with headache disorders, as well as challenge the pervasive stigma associated with headache. They also agreed that those with severe, recurrent, or disabling headache disorders should have reliable access to competent medical care; healthcare professionals should have access to adequate training in Headache Medicine; global benchmarks should be established for accurate diagnosis and the use of evidence-based treatments in patients with headache; and that information is needed about consultation, diagnosis, and treatment of headache, particularly in regard to patient preferences.

CONCLUSION

Based on the group's consensus around these issues, a series of statements was developed, and they are collectively presented herein as the Vancouver Declaration on Global Headache Patient Advocacy 2018.