Sex-Specific Considerations in Women with Aortic Stenosis and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Patterns of aortic valve replacement in Europe and adoption by sex

OBJECTIVE

Management of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) may differ according to the patient sex. This study aimed to describe patterns of aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe AS across Europe, including stratification by sex.

METHODS

Procedure volume data for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for six years (2015-2020) were extracted from national databases for Austria, Czech Republic, Denmark, England, Finland, France, Germany, Norway, Poland, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland and stratified by sex. Patients per million population (PPM) undergoing AVR per year were calculated using population estimates from Eurostat.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2019, AVR procedures grew at an average annual rate of 3.9%. In 2020, the average total PPM undergoing AVR across all countries was 339, with 51% of procedures being TAVI and 49% SAVR. AVR PPM varied widely between countries, with the highest and lowest in Germany and Poland, respectively. The average total PPM was higher for men than women (423 vs. 258), but a higher proportion of women (62%) than men (44%) received TAVI. The proportion of TAVI among total AVR procedures increased with age, with an overall average of 96% of men and 98% of women aged ≥85 years receiving TAVI; however, adoption of TAVI varied by country.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of temporal trends in the adoption of TAVI vs. SAVR across Europe showed significant variations. Despite the higher use of TAVI vs. SAVR in women, overall rates of AV intervention in women were lower compared to men.

Functional aortic valve area differs significantly between sexes: A phase-contrast cardiac MRI study in patients with severe aortic stenosis

Background

Aortic stenosis (AS) is one of the most prevalent valvular heart-diseases in Europe. Currently, diagnosis and classification are not sex-sensitive; however, due to a distinctly different natural history of AS, further investigations of sex-differences in AS-patients are needed. Thus, this study aimed to detect sex-differences in severe AS, especially concerning flow-patterns, via phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (PC-CMR).

Methods

Forty-four severe AS-patients (20 women, 45 % vs. 24 men, 55 %) with a median age of 72 years underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), cardiac catheterization (CC) and CMR. Aortic valve area (AVA) and stroke volume (SV) were determined in all modalities, with CMR yielding geometrical AVA via cine-planimetry and functional AVA via PC-CMR, the latter being also used to examine flow-properties.

Results

Geometrical AVA showed no sex-differences (0.91 cm2, IQR: 0.61-1.14 vs. 0.94 cm2, IQR: 0.77-1.22, p = 0.322). However, functional AVA differed significantly between sexes in all three modalities (TTE: p = 0.044; CC/PC-CMR: p < 0.001). In men, no significant intermethodical biases in functional AVA-measurements between modalities were found (p = 0.278); yet, in women the particular measurements differed significantly (p < 0.001). Momentary flowrate showed sex-differences depending on momentary opening-degree (at 50 %, 75 % and 90 % of peak-AVA, all p < 0.001), with men showing higher flowrates with increasing opening-area. In women, flowrate did not differ between 75 % and 90 % of peak-AVA (p = 0.191).

Conclusions

In severe AS-patients, functional AVA showed marked sex-differences in all modalities, whilst geometrical AVA did not differ. Inter-methodical biases were negligible in men, but not in women. Lastly, significant sex-differences in flow-patterns fit in with the different pathogenesis of AS.

Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implant Among Patients With A Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: A Nationwide Analysis

There is a paucity of data regarding the temporal trends and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implant (TAVI) among patients with a previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. We queried the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2016 to 2019) for hospitalized patients who underwent TAVI using the appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision procedural codes. A multivariable regression analysis was used to adjust for the patients' and hospitals' characteristics in comparing the study groups. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The final analysis included 237,829 patients who underwent TAVI, of whom 42,671 (17.9%) had a previous CABG. During the study period, there was a decrease in the proportion of patients with previous CABG who underwent TAVI (21.0% in 2016 vs 15.5% in 2019, ptrend = 0.01), although there was no change in their in-hospital mortality rate (1.08% in 2016 vs 1.25% in 2019, ptrend = 0.43). Patients with a previous CABG were younger and less likely to be women than those without a previous CABG. TAVI among those with a previous CABG was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69 to 0.91), similar rate of ischemic stroke (aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.93) and permanent pacemaker implant (aOR 1.00, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.05). Patients with a previous CABG had a lower all-cause 90-day readmission (odds ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.06) but higher readmission for transient ischemic attack. Among those with a previous CABG, female gender and chronic kidney disease stage ≥3 were independently associated with a higher in-hospital mortality, whereas obesity was associated with a lower in-hospital mortality. In conclusion, there was a decrease in the proportion of patients with a previous CABG among those who underwent TAVI. TAVI among those with a previous CABG was not associated with increased in-hospital adverse events or 90-day all-cause readmissions.

Sex Differences Among Patients Receiving Edoxaban vs Vitamin K Antagonist for Atrial Fibrillation After TAVR

Background

In the ENVISAGE-TAVI AF (Edoxaban vs Standard of Care and Their Effects on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Having Undergone Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation-Atrial Fibrillation) trial, edoxaban was noninferior to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) for a composite outcome of ischemic and bleeding complications but increased major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation after successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Women are at higher risk of bleeding and stroke than men after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. It is unclear whether the effect of edoxaban on these complications varies in relation to sex.

Objectives

This study was to assess the effect of edoxaban vs VKA according to sex in the ENVISAGE-TAVI AF trial.

Methods

The primary outcomes were net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE) and major bleeding, assessed considering the effective time on study medication (safety analysis).

Results

Out of 1,377 patients, 658 (47.8%) were women. Risks for ischemic and major bleeding outcomes were similar between women and men. Edoxaban compared to VKA was associated with a similar risk of NACE in women (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.81-1.65) and men (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.76-1.53; P for interaction = 0.820) and a higher risk of major bleeding in both sexes (P for interaction = 0.170). The risk increase of major bleeding was attenuated in women (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.69-1.79) as compared to men (HR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.07-2.85). There were no treatment-related differences for ischemic complications in both sexes.

Conclusions

Edoxaban compared to VKA was associated with a similar risk of NACE and higher risk of major bleeding in both sexes. The increase in bleeding complications with edoxaban was attenuated in women.

Population study of sex-based outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement

Background

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is a key strategy for the treatment of aortic valve disease. However, studies have involved primarily male patients, and whether the benefits of this approach can be extrapolated to female patients is unclear.

Methods

Clinical and administrative datasets for 12,207 patients undergoing isolated SAVR in Ontario from 2008 to 2019 were linked. Male and female patients were balanced using inverse probability treatment weighting. Mortality, endocarditis, and major hemorrhagic and thrombotic events, as well as 2 composite outcomes-major adverse cerebral and cardiovascular events (MACCE) and patient-derived adverse cardiovascular and noncardiovascular events (PACE)-and their component events, were compared in the weighted groups with a stratified log-rank test.

Results

A total of 7485 male patients and 4722 female patients were included in the study. Median follow-up was 5.2 years in both sexes. All-cause mortality did not differ between sexes (hazard ratio [HR] 0.949 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.851-1.059]). Male sex was associated with an increased risk of new-onset dialysis (HR 0.689 [95% CI 0.488-0.974]). Female sex was associated with a significantly increased risk of both new-onset heart failure (HR 1.211 [95% CI 1.051-1.394], P = 0.0081) and heart failure hospitalization (HR 1.200 [95% CI 1.036-1.390], P = 0.015). No statistically significant differences were seen in any of the other secondary outcomes between sexes.

Conclusions

This population health study demonstrated that survival did not differ between male and female patients undergoing SAVR. Significant sex-related differences were found in the risk of heart failure and new-onset dialysis, but these findings should be considered exploratory and require further study.

Sex-Specific Considerations in Degenerative Aortic Stenosis for Female-Tailored Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation Management

The impact of sex on pathophysiological processes, clinical presentation, treatment options, as well as outcomes of degenerative aortic stenosis remain poorly understood. Female patients are well represented in transfemoral aortic valve implantation (TAVI) trials and appear to derive favorable outcomes with TAVI. However, higher incidences of major bleeding, vascular complications, and stroke have been reported in women following TAVI. The anatomical characteristics and pathophysiological features of aortic stenosis in women might guide a tailored planning of the percutaneous approach. We highlight whether a sex-based TAVI management strategy might impact on clinical outcomes. This review aimed to evaluate the impact of sex from diagnosis to treatment of degenerative aortic stenosis, discussing the latest evidence on epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, therapeutic options, and outcomes. Furthermore, we focused on technical sex-oriented considerations in TAVI including the preprocedural screening, device selection, implantation strategy, and postprocedural management.

Sex differences in aortic stenosis: Identification of knowledge gaps for sex-specific personalized medicine

Objectives

This review summarizes sex-based differences in aortic stenosis (AS) and identifies knowledge gaps that should be addressed by future studies.

Background

AS is the most common valvular heart disease in developed countries. Sex-specific differences have not been fully appreciated, as a result of widespread under diagnosis of AS in women.

Summary

Studies including sex-stratified analyses have shown differences in pathophysiology with less calcification and more fibrosis in women's aortic valve. Women have impaired myocardial perfusion reserve and different compensatory response of the left ventricle (LV) to pressure overload, with concentric remodeling and more diffuse fibrosis, in contrast to men with more focal fibrosis and more dilated/eccentrically remodeled LV. There is sex difference in clinical presentation and anatomical characteristics, with women having more paradoxical low-flow/low-gradient AS, under-diagnosis and severity underestimated, with less referral to aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to men. The response to therapies is also different: women have more adverse events with surgical AVR and greater survival benefit with transcatheter AVR. After AVR, women would have more favorable LV remodeling, but sex-related differences in changes in myocardial reserve flow need future research.

Conclusions

Investigation into these described sex-related differences in AS offers potential utility for improving prevention and treatment of AS in women and men. To better understand sex-based differences in pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and response to therapies, sex-specific critical knowledge gaps should be addressed in future research for sex-specific personalized medicine.

Trends in Mortality From Aortic Stenosis in Europe: 2000-2017

Background: Trends in mortality from aortic stenosis across European countries are not well-understood, especially given the significant growth in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in the last 10 years. Methods: Age-standardised death rates were extracted from the World Health Organisation Mortality Database, using the International Classification of Diseases 10th edition code for non-rheumatic aortic stenosis for those aged > 45 years between 2000 and 2017. The UK and countries from the European Union with at least 1,000,000 inhabitants and at least 50% available datapoints over the study period were included: a total of 23 countries. Trends were described using Joinpoint regression analysis. Results: No reductions in mortality were demonstrated across all countries 2000-2017. Large increases in mortality were found for Croatia, Poland and Slovakia for both sexes (>300% change). Mortality plateaued in Germany from 2008 in females and 2012 in males, whilst mortality in the Netherlands declined for both sexes from 2007. Mortality differences between the sexes were observed, with greater mortality for males than females across most countries. Conclusions: Mortality from aortic stenosis has increased across Europe from 2000 to 2017. There are, however, sizable differences in mortality trends between Eastern and Western European countries. The need for health resource planning strategies to specifically target AS, particularly given the expected increase with ageing populations, is highlighted.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with a small aortic annulus: performance of supra-, intra- and infra-annular transcatheter heart valves

BACKGROUND

A small aortic annulus is associated with increased risk of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Whether specific transcatheter heart valve (THV) designs yield superior hemodynamic performance in these small anatomies remains unclear.

METHODS

Data from 8411 consecutive patients treated with TAVI from May 2012 to April 2019 at four German centers were retrospectively evaluated. A small aortic annulus was defined as multidetector computed tomography-derived annulus area < 400 mm². TAVI was performed with a balloon-expanding intra-annular (Sapien-3, n = 288), self-expanding intra-annular (Portico, n = 110), self-expanding supra-annular (Evolut, n = 179 and Acurate-Neo, n = 428) and mechanically expanding infra-annular (Lotus, n = 64) THV according to local practice. PPM was defined as indexed effective orifice area ≤ 0.85cm²/m².

RESULTS

A small annulus was found in 1069 (12.7%) patients. PPM was detected in 38.3% overall with a higher prevalence after implantation of a balloon-expanding intra-annular or mechanically expanding infra-annular THV compared to self-expanding intra- and supra-annular THV. Multivariable analysis linked self-expanding THV (Evolut: Odds ratio [OR] 0.341, Acurate-Neo: OR 0.436, Portico: OR 0.291), postdilatation (OR 0.648) and age (OR 0.968) to lower rates of PPM, while aortic valve calcification was associated with an increased risk (OR 1.001). Paravalvular regurgitation > mild was more frequent after TAVI with self-expanding THV (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

In this large contemporary multicenter patient population, a substantial number of patients with a small aortic anatomy were left with PPM after TAVI. Self-expanding supra- and intra-annular THV demonstrated superior hemodynamics in these patients at risk, however at the cost of higher rates of residual paravalvular regurgitation.

Artificial Intelligence Models Reveal Sex-Specific Gene Expression in Aortic Valve Calcification

•

Differences in the clinical presentation and physiology of aortic stenosis in men and women complicate the management of the condition.

•

By combining traditional inferential statistics, artificial intelligence predictive modeling, and genetic pathway analysis, one can gain further insight into sex-specific gene expression patterns, potentially driving the valvular phenotype differences between the sexes.

•

Results from this study, implementing a mixed and comprehensive methodological approach, offer a foundation for further exploration of potential drug targets.

Male and female aortic stenosis patients have distinct valvular phenotypes, increasing the complexities in the evaluation of valvular pathophysiology. In this study, we present cutting-edge artificial intelligence analyses of transcriptome-wide array data from stenotic aortic valves to highlight differences in gene expression patterns between the sexes, using both sex-differentiated transcripts and unbiased gene selections. This approach enabled the development of efficient models with high predictive ability and determining the most significant sex-dependent contributors to calcification. In addition, analyses of function-related gene groups revealed enriched fibrotic pathways among female patients. Ultimately, we demonstrate that artificial intelligence models can be used to accurately predict aortic valve calcification by carefully analyzing sex-specific gene transcripts.

Transvalvular Flow, Sex, and Survival After Valve Replacement Surgery in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND

The respective impacts of transvalvular flow, gradient, sex, and their interactions on mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to compare the impact of pre-operative flow-gradient patterns on mortality after AVR and to examine whether there are sex differences.

METHODS

This study analyzed clinical, echocardiographic, and outcome data prospectively collected in 1,490 patients (544 women [37%]), with severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction who underwent AVR.

RESULTS

In this cohort, 601 patients (40%) had normal flow (NF) with high gradient (HG), 405 (27%) NF with low gradient (LG), 246 (17%) paradoxical low flow (LF)/HG, and 238 (16%) LF/LG. During a median follow-up of 2.42 years (interquartile range: 1.04 to 4.29 years), 167 patients died. Patients with LF/HG exhibited the highest mortality after AVR (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33 to 3.03; p < 0.01), which remained significant after multivariate adjustment (HR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.29 to 2.98; p < 0.01). Both LF/LG and NF/LG patients had comparable outcome to NF/HG (p ≥ 0.47). Optimal thresholds of stroke volume index were obtained for men (40 ml/m²) and women (32 ml/m²). Using these sex-specific cutpoints, paradoxical LF was independently associated with increased mortality in both women (adjusted HR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.21 to 3.47; p < 0.01) and men (adjusted HR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.32; p = 0.042), whereas guidelines' threshold (35 ml/m²) does not.

CONCLUSIONS

Paradoxical LF/HG was associated with higher mortality following AVR, suggesting that a reduced flow is a marker of disease severity even in patients with HG aortic stenosis. Early surgical AVR (i.e., before gradient attains 40 mm Hg) might be preferable in these patients. Furthermore, the use of sex-specific thresholds (<40 ml/m² for men and <32 ml/m² for women) to define low-flow outperforms the guidelines' threshold of 35 ml/m² in risk stratification after AVR.

Transvalvular Flow Rate Determines Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Area in Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1.0 cm² is a defining characteristic of severe aortic stenosis (AS). AVA can be underestimated at low transvalvular flow rate. Yet, the impact of flow rate on prognostic value of AVA ≤1.0 cm² is unknown and is not incorporated into AS assessment.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of flow rate on prognostic value of AVA in AS.

METHODS

In total, 1,131 patients with moderate or severe AS and complete clinical follow-up were included as part of a longitudinal database. The effect of flow rate (ratio of stroke volume to ejection time) on prognostic value of AVA ≤1.0 cm² for time to death was evaluated, adjusting for confounders. Sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the optimal cutoff for prognostic threshold of AVA. The findings were validated in a separate external longitudinal cohort of 939 patients.

RESULTS

Flow rate had a significant effect on prognostic value of AVA. AVA ≤1.0 cm² was not prognostic for mortality (p = 0.15) if AVA was measured at flow rates below median (≤242 ml/s). In contrast, AVA ≤1.0 cm² was highly prognostic for mortality (p = 0.003) if AVA was measured at flow rates above median (>242 ml/s). Findings were irrespective of multivariable adjustment for age, sex, and surgical/transcatheter aortic valve replacement (as time-dependent covariates); comorbidities; medications; and echocardiographic features. AVA ≤1.0 cm² was also not an independent predictor of mortality below median flow rate in the validation cohort. The optimal flow rate cutoff for prognostic threshold was 210 ml/s.

CONCLUSIONS

Transvalvular flow rate determines prognostic value of AVA in AS. AVA measured at low flow rate is not a good prognostic marker and therefore not a good diagnostic marker for truly severe AS. Flow rate assessment should be incorporated into clinical diagnosis, classification, and prognosis of AS.

Sex-Based Differences in Coronary and Structural Percutaneous Interventions

In the current state of interventional cardiology, the ability to offer advanced therapies to patients who historically were not surgical candidates has grown exponentially in the last few decades. As therapies have expanded in complex coronary and structural interventions, the nuances of treating certain populations have emerged. In particular, the role of sex-based anatomic and outcome differences has been increasingly recognized. As guidelines for cardiovascular prevention and treatment for certain conditions may vary by sex, therapeutic interventions in the structural and percutaneous coronary areas may also vary. In this review, we aim to discuss these differences, the current literature available on these topics, and areas of focus for the future.

Gender differences in aortic valve replacement: is surgical aortic valve replacement riskier and transcatheter aortic valve replacement safer in women than in men?

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive and degenerative disease that necessitates valve replacement through either surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Various studies have shown that, unlike for TAVR, SAVR is associated with an elevated risk for women as compared to men. The aim of this review is to better understand the risks and their possible causes, associated with the use of both TAVR and SAVR in female patients. Our systematic review included studies published between 2012 and 2020, identified through specific searches of PubMed. Compatibility of publications, determined by the use of pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria, resulted in 15 articles being used in our review. Overall, more men than women undergo SAVR, but our findings confirmed that SAVR is associated with worse outcomes in women in the short-term. Reasons for a higher 30-day mortality post-SAVR in women include an increased age, higher in-hospital mortality and, possibly baseline comorbidities and anatomical differences. There was no difference observed in 30-day mortality between men and women undergoing TAVR. Female patients appear to have a better longer-term survival post-TAVR than their male counterparts. Understanding the reasons why women have worse outcomes post-SAVR is essential for ensuring appropriate treatment selection for patients with AS, as well as for achieving the best possible long-term and safety outcomes for these patients.