Radiographic and navigation measurements of TKA limb alignment do not correlate

Postoperative full leg radiographs exhibit less residual coronal varus deformity compared to intraoperative measurements in robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty with the MAKO™ system

PURPOSE

Robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (raTKA), currently a major trend in knee arthroplasty, aims to improve the accuracy of implant positioning and limb alignment. However, it is unclear whether and to what extent manual radiographic and navigation measurements with the MAKO™ system correlate. Nonetheless, a high agreement would be crucial to reliably achieve the desired limb alignment.

METHODS

Thirty-six consecutive patients with osteoarthritis and a slight-to-moderate varus deformity undergoing raTKA were prospectively included in this study. Prior to surgery and at follow-up, a full leg radiograph (FLR) under weight-bearing conditions was performed. In addition, a computed tomography (CT) scan was conducted for preoperative planning. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), mechanical lateral distal femur angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) and joint line convergence angle (JLCA) were measured in the preoperative and follow-up FLR as well as in the CT scout (without weight-bearing) by three independent raters. Furthermore, the HKA was intraoperatively assessed with the MAKO™ system before and after raTKA.

RESULTS

Significantly higher HKA values were identified for intraoperative deformity assessment using the MAKO system compared to the preoperative FLR and CT scouts (p = 0.006; p = 0.05). Intraoperative assessment of the HKA with final implants showed a mean residual varus deformity of 3.2° ± 1.9°, whereas a significantly lower residual varus deformity of 1.4° ± 1.9° was identified in the postoperative FLR (p < 0.001). The mMPTA was significantly higher in the preoperative FLR than in the CT scouts (p < 0.001). Intraoperatively, the mMPTA was adjusted to a mean of 87.5° ± 0.9° with final implants, while significantly higher values were measured in postoperative FLRs (p < 0.001). Concerning the mLDFA, no significant differences could be identified.

CONCLUSION

The clinical importance of this study lies in the finding that there is a difference between residual varus deformity measured intraoperatively with the MAKO™ system and those measured in postoperative FLRs. This has implications for preoperative planning as well as intraoperative fine-tuning of the implant position during raTKA to avoid overcorrection of knees with slight-to-moderate varus osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Comparison of CT and EOS in assessing coronal lower limb alignment when planning total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

As surgical technologies and alignment strategies develop, accuracy of lower limb alignment assessment gains increasing importance. The current gold standard remains long leg (4ft) radiographs. Other measures include computed tomography (CT) and EOS scans. This study aimed to compare CT and EOS long leg views to determine the reliability of assessment of hip-knee-angle (HKA) in arthritic knees.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of 96 knees in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was performed comparing HKA alignment data from EOS and CT. Coronal HKA and sagittal flexion angle were assessed by two independent observers. Inter-observer correlation was calculated.

RESULTS

The coronal alignment on EOS was strongly positively correlated to coronal alignment on CT (r = 0.927, p = 0.001). 12 knees (13 %) exceeded CT vs EOS difference of 3°. Inter-rater reliability was excellent (intra-class coefficients >0.9). The mean difference between CT and EOS was significantly greater for patients with fixed flexion >10° (0.68) vs <10° (-0.2) p = 0.004. Mean difference in HKA did not differ between those 0-10° varus and >10° varus (p = 0.273). Valgus HKA had a higher mean difference (1.9°) compared to varus knees (-0.4°) (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CT and EOS showed excellent inter-rater reliability and correlated well. Increased sagittal plane deformity does effect coronal HKA assessment. Extreme varus did not affect the mean difference significantly, while valgus did. For the majority of patients either CT or EOS will give a reliable assessment of HKA but beware those with significant valgus or sagittal deformity where both modalities may be necessary to plan TKA.

Limb alignment changes with knee flexion: A study based on CAS data

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence has questioned the value of standing limb alignment for predicting the adduction moment and forces exerted on healthy and prosthetic knees. The purpose of this study was to assess the lower limb alignment of OA knee patients at various knee flexion angles. The main hypothesis was that lower limb alignment measured throughout knee flexion does not significantly differ between patients displaying different extension alignment (neutral, varus or valgus).

METHODS

206 arthritic knee patients undergoing computer-assisted total (CAS) knee prosthesis were included. Frontal limb alignment was assessed in a systematic manner by CAS at three knee positions: extension, 90 degrees of flexion and maximal flexion. The HKA angle at each knee position and the change in HKA angle between two knee positions (delta value) were reported and compared.

RESULTS

A large proportion of OA patients had significant variation in their lower limb alignment (32% with Δ HKA > 5°). The extended limb deformity tended to reduce with knee flexion: mean of 5° and 6° deformity reduction for varus and valgus patients, 40% and 66% of varus and valgus patients progressed to neutral alignment with 90° knee flexion. Forty percent of neutral extended lower limb did not maintain their neutral alignment but rather progressed to either varus or valgus at 90° knee flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

Limb alignment in extension is a poor predictor of limb alignment in flexion in OA patients. Only considering the traditional frontal alignment of an extended lower limb for planning knee arthroplasty or osteotomy is likely insufficient.

Accuracy of the correction achieved after a valgus high tibial osteotomy: Comparison of the Hernigou table and navigation

INTRODUCTION

The outcome of a medial opening wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy indicated for the treatment of isolated medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis depends mainly on the accuracy of the correction of the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) and the mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA). Most authors aim for a desired correction target between 2° and 4° of valgus. Several planning and surgical techniques have been described to achieve this target value that is specific to each surgeon.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of the correction achieved using either the Hernigou table (HT) planning method or a computer-assisted navigation system (CAS). It was hypothesized that no difference would be found between these 2 techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective single-center study involved 43 knees: 21 in the HT group and 22 in the CAS group. Two surgeons (ME, JYJ), who were experts in 1 of the 2 planning methods performed these procedures, with a single surgeon assigned to each group. The correction was noted in the operative report and was considered to be the desired correction target. The surgical correction was calculated by comparing preoperative and immediate postoperative mMPTA measurements. The surgical accuracy, where a value close to 0 represented optimal accuracy, was defined as the absolute value of the difference between the correction target set by the surgeon and the surgical correction achieved. The median accuracy between the 2 groups was compared by a Mann-Whitney U test (significance level at 5%). The number of patients deviating from the target by>3° was analyzed with a Fisher exact test (significance level at 5%). Pre- and postoperative comparisons of the HKAA measurements could not be used because the measurement was not performed postoperatively for the CAS group.

RESULTS

The median surgical accuracy on the mMPTA was 1.4° (0-4.1) for the HT group versus 1.9° (0.2-6.7) for the CAS group (p=0.85). Sixteen procedures (76%) were performed with an accuracy of<3° in the HT group versus 15 in the CAS group (68%) (p=0.73).

DISCUSSION-CONCLUSION

The working hypothesis was confirmed: no differences were found between the HT and CAS groups regarding the surgical accuracy in achieving the corrections set in this series. We therefore demonstrated that HT was a highly accessible, simple and reliable technique for achieving the planned target. It can be used widely.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; comparative retrospective series.

Safe and effective use of active robotics for TKA: Early results of a multicenter study

Background

A novel active robotic system for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performs automated milling of bone surfaces. Study objectives were to assess system safety and effectiveness in a US population.

Methods

A multicenter clinical trial was conducted, following 115 patients for at least 6-months. A pre-defined list of robot-related adverse events was used to evaluate safety. Efficacy was assessed radiographically comparing planned versus achieved coronal limb alignment.

Results

No pre-defined adverse events occurred and postoperative limb alignment more than ±3° from plan occurred in 11.2 % of cases.

Conclusion

Active robotics for TKA is safe and effective as demonstrated in this trial.

Fluoroscopic Intraoperative Images Produce Higher Image Quality and Decrease Total Radiation Exposure Compared to Radiographic X-ray Images in Patients After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND/AIM

Proper radiographic documentation of implant alignment is needed to analyse malrotation and malpositioning. We examined whether intraoperative fluoroscopic images can achieve more accurate image quality than postoperative radiographic X-ray images.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively analysed 30 consecutive patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We compared intraoperative fluoroscopic images with postoperative radiographic X-ray images. Radiation exposure was documented.

RESULTS

Fluoroscopic anterior-posterior images could achieve accurate image quality in 77% compared to 60% in radiographic images (p=0.016) and 54% compared to 34% on lateral view, respectively (p=0.008). Very good intra-observer correlation for fluoroscopic images could be achieved for femoral α angle with 0.84. Radiation exposure was 0.087+/-0.128 mGy.

CONCLUSION

We observed significantly better image quality in fluoroscopic images than in radiographic X-ray images. The observed radiation exposure is lower than those expected for radiographic X-ray images. We conclude that fluoroscopic images can produce higher image quality and decreased radiation exposure.

Accuracy of the correction obtained after tibial valgus osteotomy. Comparison of the use of the Hernigou table and the so-called classical method

INTRODUCTION

Medial valgus-producing tibial osteotomy (MVTO) is classically used to treat early medial femorotibial osteoarthritis. Long-term results depend on the mechanical femorotibial angle (HKA) obtained at the end of the procedure. A correction goal between 3 and 6° valgus is commonly accepted. Several planning methods are described to achieve this goal, but none is superior to the other.

OBJECTIVE

The main objective was to compare the accuracy of the correction obtained using either the Hernigou table (HT) or a so-called conventional method (CM) for which 1° of correction corresponds to 1° of osteotomy opening. The secondary objective was to analyze the variations observed in the sagittal plane on the tibial slope and on the patellar height. The working hypothesis was that the HT allowed a more accurate correction and that the tibial slope and patellar height were modified in both groups.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

In this monocentric and retrospective study, two senior surgeons operated on 39 knees (18 in the CM group, 21 in the HT group) between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2014. The operator was unique for each group and expert in the technique used. The correction objective chosen for each patient, and written in the operative report, was considered as the one to be achieved. The surgical correction was the difference between the pre-operative and immediate post-operative data (< 5 J) for the mechanical tibial angle (MTA) and the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle. Surgical accuracy, where a value close to 0 is optimal, was the absolute value of the difference between the surgical correction performed and the goal set by the surgeon.

RESULTS

The median surgical accuracy on the MTA was 3.5° [0.2-7.4] versus 1.4° [0-4.1] in the CM and HT groups, respectively (p = 0.006). In multivariate analysis, with the same objective, the CM had a significantly lower accuracy of 1.9° ± 0.8 (p = 0.02). For HKA, the median accuracy was 3.1° [0.3-7.3] versus 0.8° [0-5] in the CM and HT groups, respectively (p = 0.006). Five (5/18, 28%) and 16 (16/21, 76%) knees were within 3° of the target in the CM and HT groups, respectively (p = 0.004). The median tibial slope increased in both groups. This increase was significantly greater in the CM group compared with the HT group, with 5.5° [- 0.3-13] versus 0.5 [- 5.2-5.6], respectively (p < 0.001). The median Caton-Deschamps index decreased (patella lowered) in both groups after surgery, by - 0.21 [- 1.03; - 0.05] and - 0.14 [- 0.4-0.16], but without significant difference (p = 0.19). In univariate analysis, changes in tibial slope and patellar height were not significantly related to frontal surgical correction performed according to ΔMTA (R² = 0.07; p = 0.055) and (R² = - 0.02; p = 0.54) respectively.

DISCUSSION

The correction set by the surgeons was achieved with greater accuracy and more frequently in the HT group, confirming the working hypothesis. The HT is therefore recommended as a simple way of achieving the set objective; the tibial slope and patellar height were modified unaffected by the frontal correction performed.

Femoral flexion position is a highly variable factor in total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 593 conventionally aligned total knee replacements

PURPOSE

In contrast to coronal alignment, only few is known about sagittal alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to identify the flexion position of the femoral component in a routine surgical setting of conventional TKA and to evaluate potential predictors for the degree of femoral flexion.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on 593 primary TKA using the conventional intramedullary alignment technique for distal femur. Femoral flexion was measured by the verification mode of a pinless navigation system. Correlations between femoral flexion and patient-specific data, surgery-related factors and measurements of a preoperative anterior-posterior long-leg X-ray were analysed.

RESULTS

The distal femoral resection showed a mean flexion of 5.5° ± 2.5° to the mechanical axis with high variation between 2.5° extension and 14° flexion. In a multivariate regression model, body height (p = 0.023), body weight (p = 0.046) and body mass index (p = 0.026) showed significant positive correlation to femoral flexion. There was no correlation to any preoperative alignment data from the anterior-posterior long-leg film. The sagittal position was also independent from surgery-related factors such as different knee systems or surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral flexion is a highly variable characteristic in conventionally aligned TKA. Increasing body height, body weight and body mass index were identified as predictors for a high degree of femoral flexion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Accuracy of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective computed tomography-based study

INTRODUCTION

Evidence now exists advocating the use of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite the introduction of new navigation systems into clinical practice no evidence currently exists showing independent verification of their accuracy. The aim of this study was to validate the in vivo accuracy of the Exactech Guided Personalised Surgery (GPS) computer navigation system using a validated computed tomography (CT) measurement of alignment.

METHOD

Consecutive patients who underwent TKA using the GPS Navigation System at our institution were prospectively recruited. Intraoperative parameters of 3D alignment as measured by the GPS navigation system were recorded and compared against the postoperative measurements of alignment measured using the Perth CT Protocol to assess the accuracy of the GPS navigation system.

RESULTS

29 consecutive patients (13 male, 16 female) who underwent TKA were prospectively recruited. Overall, for all measures of 3D alignment the mean difference between intraoperatively recorded and postoperative CT-measured alignment was 1.55° ± 0.22° (95% confidence interval). Individual measurement differences in the femoral prosthesis were: coronal alignment 1.64° ± 0.52°; flexion 2.07° ± 0.55°; rotation 1.38° ± 0.33° Differences in the tibial prosthesis were: coronal alignment 2.03° ± 0.53°; slope 1.14° ± 0.39° The whole limb coronal alignment difference was 2.34° ± 0.83° CONCLUSION: The Exactech GPS Navigation system is very accurate with a high concordance between intraoperative and postoperative measures of alignment and prosthesis positioning. We therefore confidently validate the system and support its continued use in clinical practice. Other navigation systems should undergo a similar validation process.

Implant placement accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: validation of a CT-based measurement technique

Background

The primary goal of many computer-assisted surgical systems like robotics for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to accurately execute a preoperative plan. To assess whether the preoperative plan was executed accurately in 3D, one option is to compare the planned and postoperative implant placement using a preoperative and postoperative CT scan of the patient's limb. This comparison requires a 3D-to-3D surface registration between the preoperative and postoperative 3D bone models and between the planned and postoperative 3D implants. Hence, the present study aimed at validating this measurement technique by determining (I) the anatomical regions that result in the lowest 6-degree of freedom (DoF) errors for 3D-to-3D surface registration of bone models, (II) the 6-DoF errors for 3D-to-3D surface registration of the implant models, and (III) the 6-DoF of the complete measurement technique.

Methods

Four different regions of the femur were tested to determine which one would result in the most accurate 3D-to-3D registration of the bone models using 12 cadaveric lower limb specimens. Next, total knee arthroplasties were performed on six specimens, and the accuracy of the 3D-to-3D implant registration was evaluated against a gold standard registration performed using fiducial markers.

Results

The most accurate 3D-to-3D bone registration was obtained when using the largest anatomical regions available after TKA, being the full 3D femur model or the femur model without the distal femur which resulted in root mean square errors within 0.2 mm for translations and 0.2° for rotation. The accuracy of the 3D-to-3D femoral and tibial implant registration was within 0.7 mm for translations and 0.4°-0.6° for rotations, respectively. The accuracy for the overall procedure was within 0.9 mm and 0.6° for both femur and tibia when using femoral regions resulting in accurate 3D-to-3D bone registration.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this measurement technique can be used in applications where measurement errors up to 0.9 mm in translations and up to 0.6° in rotations in component placement are acceptable.

The impact of body-mass index on the frontal knee alignment estimation using three-dimensional reconstruction based on movement analysis

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the influence of the body-mass index (BMI) on the estimation of the static frontal knee alignment (FKA) using three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction method based on movement analysis.

METHODS

Two-hundred nineteen knees (120 individuals with end-stage osteoarthritis) were analyzed. The validity of the 3D method was evaluated under comparison with a reference method based on weight bearing full-leg length radiography. Extensive statistical analyses (Pearson's correlation, one-way ANOVA, linear regression, boxplot diagram) over four groups of BMI (normal, overweight, obese class I and obese classes II and III) were performed.

RESULTS

For BMI below 25 kg/m², the validity of the 3D method was confirmed. For BMI over 25 kg/m², there was an increasing error of the 3D method, especially for the obese groups affected with a large varus alignment.

CONCLUSIONS

In a biomechanical context of movement analysis, the results of the study suggest that the 3D method may represent a satisfying alternative to the full-leg radiograph method with limitations regarding to BMI over 25 kg/m².

The influence of computer-assisted surgery experience on the accuracy and precision of the postoperative mechanical axis during computer-assisted lateral closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy

Background

There is debate regarding the influence of a surgeon’s experience with computer-assisted surgery (CAS) on the postoperative mechanical axis (MA) in CAS-high tibial osteotomy. The purpose of the present study was to compare radiographic results between early and late cohorts of a consecutive series of patients to assess the influence of CAS experience on accuracy and precision of the postoperative MA during CAS lateral closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy (LCWHTO).

Materials and methods

Results from 140 CAS-LCWHTO operations were retrospectively reviewed. The first 70 cases, performed during the learning curve period for CAS between 2005 and 2009, were considered to be the “early cohort.” The subsequent 70 cases, performed with greater CAS experience after the completion of the learning curve between 2009 and 2014, were considered to be the “late cohort.” The target postoperative MA angle was valgus 3°. Pre- and postoperative MA angles were evaluated by navigation and radiographs. The proportion of postoperative MA inliers (≤ target angle ±3°) was investigated radiographically. The correlation between the navigation and radiographic measurements was analyzed.

Results

The average postosteotomy MA angle on navigation was 3.4° in both cohorts. The average postoperative MA angle on radiographs was 1.0° in the early cohort and 2.2° in the late cohort (P = 0.003). Radiographically, the proportion of postoperative MA inliers was greater in the late cohort than in the early cohort (early versus late, 71.4% versus 90%; P = 0.011). The pre- and postoperative correlation between navigation and radiographic measurements was also stronger in the late cohort (early versus late; preoperative r = 0.558 versus 0.663; postoperative r = 0.310 versus 0.376).

Conclusions

Greater experience with CAS increased the accuracy and precision of postoperative MA alignment as well as the correlation between navigation and radiographic measurements. Caution should be taken during registration procedures to achieve accurate alignment correction in CAS-LCWHTO.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty are not adversely affected by body mass index

Aim

To study the effect of obesity on clinical and radiographic outcomes of computer-navigated knee arthroplasty.

Materials and methods

117 patients underwent primary computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. Eight were lost to follow-up and 8 had incomplete data.

Results

Eighty-four (83.2%) female, 17 (16.8%) male patients age 65.3 ± 6.9 years with a pre-operative BMI 27.2 ± 4.1 (18.6-40.0) kg/m², 7.3 ± 0.98 years follow-up. Forty-two (41.6%) had a BMI>27.5 kg/m² indicative of obesity in Singapore. Post-operative radiographic alignment, 2-year Oxford knee scores and ROM were not significantly associated with BMI.

Conclusion

BMI is not a determinant of functional scores when computer navigation is used.

The Use of Navigation in Osteotomies Around the Knee

Osteotomies around the knee for treating osteoarthritis or knee instability are currently well-established procedures. Success of these realignment procedures is based on the accuracy and the reliability of correction angles in the coronal and sagittal alignment. In this context of improving precision and adapting the correction to each patient, navigation is currently being widely used. The rationale for its use is based on understanding the advantages and limitations, technical principles, and potential pitfalls. This article describes these areas and the overall clinical outcomes of this system for knee osteotomies.

Weight-bearing radiography depends on limb loading

PURPOSE

The mechanical axis of the lower limb has shown to vary between different weight-bearing conditions and change after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between mechanical axis alignment in standing long-leg radiographs and limb loading after TKA.

METHODS

Mechanical axis of the lower limb and limb loading have been prospectively evaluated in 115 patients 10 days and 3 months after TKA. By the moment of standing long-leg radiography for analysis of the mechanical leg axis, two digital scales separately captured the load of each limb.

RESULTS

Mechanical axis changed from an initial - 1° ± 2° valgus alignment to a varus axis of + 1° ± 2° (p < 0.01). This change in alignment was associated with an increase of limb loading from 89.9 ± 10.7 to 93.0 ± 7.0% (p < 0.01). The mechanical axis strongly correlated with relative limb loading at the first and second measurements (r = 0.804, p < 0.001, respectively, r = 0.562, p < 0.001). A significant change in the rate of outliers was registered within the observation period. These alterations and distinctions were much more pronounced in patients with postoperative incomplete extension (n = 15).

CONCLUSIONS

The postoperative mechanical axis correlates with limb loading. A clinical relevant change in frontal alignment of the lower limb is associated with increased limb loading after TKA. The actual mechanical axis can only be assessed at physiological limb loading in long-leg radiographs with complete extension at full weight bearing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level II.

Reliability and Validity of the Femorotibial Mechanical Axis Angle in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Navigation versus Weight Bearing or Supine Whole Leg Radiographs

Purpose

To evaluate the reliability and validity of the femorotibial mechanical axis angle from radiographs in the weight bearing (WB) and supine positions compared with navigation-measured values.

Materials and Methods

Sixty-eight cases of navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were included. The pre- and postoperative whole leg radiographs (WLRs) in WB and supine positions were compared with the initial and final navigation values.

Results

The mean mechanical axis angle from the preoperative WBWLR and navigation were not statistically different (p=0.079) and were correlated strongly with each other (intraclass correlation [ICC], 0.818). However, on postoperative measurements, although the WBWLR and navigation values were not different (p=0.098), they were not correlated with each other (ICC, 0.093). The standard error of measurement was 1.8°±3.6° for the preoperative WBWLR and 2.5°±4.8° for the postoperative WBWLR. The validity that was determined by the Bland-Altman plot was not acceptable for both pre- and postoperative measurements.

Conclusions

The preoperative WBWLR could provide accurate but not precise measurement value of the femorotibial mechanical axis angle for navigation-assisted TKA, and postoperative measurements in navigation were not comparable with radiographic measurements. The lack of agreement was found between the radiographic and navigation measurements of the coronal alignment regardless of pre- or postoperative evaluation although the accuracy was found acceptable.

Level of Evidence

Level 4.

Factors affecting femoral rotational angle based on the posterior condylar axis in gap-based navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty for valgus knee

Background

Achieving proper rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for valgus knee is challenging because of lateral condylar hypoplasia and lateral cartilage erosion. Gap-based navigation-assisted TKA enables surgeons to determine the angle of femoral component rotation (FCR) based on the posterior condylar axis. This study evaluated the possible factors that affect the rotational alignment of the femoral component based on the posterior condylar axis.

Materials and methods

Between 2008 and 2016, 28 knees were enrolled. The dependent variable for this study was FCR based on the posterior condylar axis, which was obtained from the navigation system archives. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to identify factors that might predict FCR, including body mass index (BMI), Kellgren-Lawrence grade (K-L grade), lateral distal femoral angles obtained from the navigation system and radiographs (NaviLDFA, XrayLDFA), hip-knee-ankle (HKA) axis, lateral gap under varus stress (LGVS), medial gap under valgus stress (MGVS), and side-to-side difference (STSD, MGVS − LGVS).

Results

The mean FCR was 6.1° ± 2.0°. Of all the potentially predictive factors evaluated in this study, only NaviLDFA (β = −0.668) and XrayLDFA (β = −0.714) predicted significantly FCR.

Conclusions

The LDFAs, as determined using radiographs and the navigation system, were both predictive of the rotational alignment of the femoral component based on the posterior condylar axis in gap-based TKA for valgus knee. A 1° increment with NaviLDFA led to a 0.668° decrement in FCR, and a 1° increment with XrayLDFA led to a 0.714° decrement. This suggests that symmetrical lateral condylar hypoplasia of the posterior and distal side occurs in lateral compartment end-stage osteoarthritis with valgus deformity.

Accuracy of leg alignment measurements from antero-posterior radiographs

After a knee replacement procedure, postoperative radiological assessment is carried out to evaluate outcome and predict procedure success. For this assessment, long-standing load-bearing antero-posterior radiographs are used to carry out manual identification of anatomic landmarks. These landmarks are subsequently used to estimate leg alignment. The positions of the landmarks in the radiographs are affected by the patient pose and the X-ray projection center. Although there is some past work exploring the impact of patient pose on the landmarks in the radiographs, there is no previous work on the impact of the X-ray projection center on the estimated leg alignment. In this work, we carried out a study of the impact of patient foot rotation, and X-ray projection center on landmark measurement errors, and estimation of leg alignment. In this evaluation, landmarks were first identified in three-dimensional computed tomography scans. Digitally reconstructed radiographs were then obtained from these scans under varying rotation and projection centers. Subsequently, landmarks were manually identified in these radiographs and leg alignment was estimated from these landmarks. We found that foot rotation leads to increased errors in certain landmarks. We also found that variations in the X-ray projection center do not lead to significant (p<0.01) errors in landmark measurements. Also, errors as large as 13.1 mm for the femoral knee center and 13.6 mm for the lateral malleolus led to a maximum error of 1.46° for the femoral mechanical axis and 0.66° for the tibial mechanical axis.

Radiographic Evaluation of Alignment Following TKA, a Systematic Review

Postoperative assessment is of paramount importance in primary total knee arthroplasty. A thorough postoperative analysis helps the surgeon anticipate any postoperative potential issues and correlate the preoperative planning with the postoperative result, and provides better understanding of the importance of surgical principles of primary total knee arthroplasty. In addition, postoperative analysis helps the surgeon understand surgical errors and improve future outcomes. Standard radiographs, with a known magnification, should be obtained for postoperative total knee arthroplasty evaluation. Although imaging evaluation of knee arthroplasty is usually limited to conventional radiographs, examples of the utility of computed tomography are also illustrated, and suggested imaging strategies discussed.

Reliability of an Integrated Ultrasound and Stereophotogrammetric System for Lower Limb Anatomical Characterisation

Background

Lower extremity analysis for preoperative total knee and hip arthroplasty routines can increase surgery success rate and hence reduce associated costs. Current tools are limited by being invasive, limited to supine analysis, or too expensive. This study aimed to propose and validate a device, OrthoPilot®, based on the combined use of a stereophotogrammetric and ultrasound system which can in vivo and noninvasively measure varus/valgus, flexion/extension, femur and tibia torsion, and femur and tibia lengths.

Methods

A phantom was measured by four operators to determine the resolution of the system. Interoperator variability was measured on three operators who measured the above six variables on both legs of three subjects in standing and supine positions. Intraoperator variability was assessed on data from three repeats from 9 subjects (18 legs).

Results

All 6 variables were reliably detected on a phantom, with a resolution of 1 mm and 0.5°. Inter- and intraoperator consistency was observed for varus/valgus, flexion/extension, and length measurements on the healthy subjects in standing and supine positions (all ICC > 0.93). For torsion measurements, there was a considerable variation.

Conclusion

The proposed system, when used on healthy subjects, allowed reliable measurements of key parameters for preoperative procedures in both supine and standing positions. Accuracy testing and further validation on patient populations will be the next step toward its clinical adoption.

Frontal alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Comparative study between radiographic measurement and surgical navigation

OBJECTIVE

To establish the concordance between angulation of the femoro-tibial mechanical axis measured with x-rays and surgical navigation in both the pre and postoperative period after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was implanted.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Pre and postoperative measurements were analyzed in 88 TKA of the same model and all performed with the same surgical navigation system. The mechanical frontal angle (MFA) and femoro-tibial anatomic angle were measured before and after the TKA. The angulation was digitally measured with a teleradiography. In the navigation, the femoro-tibial angle at rest, forced varus and valgus were registered and the average of these three measurements was calculated.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative MFA measured on the radiograph was 4.55°. The mean of the same angle measured on the postoperative radiograph was 1.72°, (p=0.05). The mean of the MFA measured with navigation before TKA was 3.12° and after the implant with navigation was 0.53 (P=.013). The concordance coefficient between the MFA in teleradiography and in navigation was 0.869 (P<.001) preoperatively and 0.709 postoperatively (P=.017).

CONCLUSIONS

We found a strong concordance between radiographic and surgical navigation measurements of the MFA. This may imply that teleradiography is not necessary when using surgical navigation in TKA.

A Comparison of Plain Radiography with Computer Tomography in Determining Coronal and Sagittal Alignments following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction: Optimal coronal and sagittal component positioning is important in achieving a successful outcome following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Modalities to determine post-operative alignment include plain radiography and computer tomography (CT) imaging. This study aims to determine the accuracy and reliability of plain radiographs in measuring coronal and sagittal alignment following TKA.

Materials and Methods: A prospective, consecutive study of 58 patients undergoing TKA was performed comparing alignment data from plain radiographs and CT imaging. Hip-knee-angle (HKA), sagittal femoral angle (SFA) and sagittal tibial angle (STA) measurements were taken by two observers from plain radiographs and compared with CT alignment. Intra- and inter-observer correlation was calculated for each measurement.

Results: Intra-observer correlation was excellent for HKA (r>0.89) with a mean difference of <1.9°. The least intra-observer correlation was for SFA (mean r=0.58) with a mean difference of 8°. Inter-observer correlation was better for HKA (r>0.95) and STA (r>0.8) compared to SFA (r=0.5). When comparing modalities (radiographs vs CT), HKA estimations for both observers showed the least maximum and mean differences while SFA observations were the least accurate.

Conclusion: Radiographic estimation of HKA showed excellent intra- and inter-observer correlation and corresponds well with CT imaging. However, radiographic estimation of sagittal plane alignment was less reliably measured and correlated less with CT imaging. Plain radiography was found to be inferior to CT for estimation of biplanar prosthetic alignment following TKA.

Do CAS measurements correlate with EOS 3D alignment measurements in primary TKA?

PURPOSE

Objective of this study was to compare intraoperative computer-assisted surgery (CAS) alignment measurements during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with pre- and postoperative coronal alignment measurements using EOS 3D reconstructions.

METHODS

In a prospective study, 56 TKAs using imageless CAS were performed and coronal alignment measurements were recorded twice: before bone cuts were made and after implantation of the prosthesis. Pre- and postoperative coronal alignment measurements were performed using EOS 3D reconstructions. Thanks to the EOS radiostereography system, measurement errors due to malpositioning and deformity during acquisition are eliminated. CAS measurements were compared with EOS 3D reconstructions. Varus/valgus angle (VV), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were measured.

RESULTS

Significantly different VV angles were measured pre- and postoperatively with CAS compared to EOS. For preoperative measurements, mLDFA did not differ significantly, but a significantly larger mMPTA in valgus was measured with CAS.

CONCLUSION

Results of this study indicate that differences in alignment measurements between CAS measurements and pre- and postoperative EOS 3D are due mainly to the difference between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing position and potential errors in validity and reliability of the CAS system. EOS 3D measurements overestimate VV angle in lower limbs with substantial mechanical axis deviation. For lower limbs with minor mechanical axis deviation as well as for mMPTA measurements, CAS measures more valgus than EOS. Eventually the results of this study are of clinical relevance, since it raises concerns regarding the validity and reliability of CAS systems in TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IIb.

Measurement of lower limb alignment: there are within-person differences between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing measurement modalities

PURPOSE

Previous studies have compared weight-bearing mechanical leg axis (MLA) measurements to non-weight-bearing measurement modalities. Most of these studies compared mean or median values and did not analyse within-person differences between measurements. This study evaluates the within-person agreement of MLA measurements between weight-bearing full-length radiographs (FLR) and non-weight-bearing measurement modalities (computer-assisted surgery (CAS) navigation or MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two independent observers measured the MLA on pre- and postoperative weight-bearing FLR in 168 patients. These measurements were compared to non-weight-bearing measurements obtained by CAS navigation or MRI. Absolute differences in individual subjects were calculated to determine the agreement between measurement modalities. Linear regression was used to evaluate the possibility that other independent variables impact the differences in measurements.

RESULTS

A difference was found in preoperative measurements between FLR and CAS navigation (mean of 2.5° with limit of agreement (1.96 SD) of 6.4°), as well as between FLR and MRI measurements (mean of 2.4° with limit of agreement (1.96 SD) of 6.9°). Postoperatively, the mean difference between MLA measured on FLR compared to CAS navigation was 1.5° (limit of agreement (1.96 SD) of 4.6°). Linear regression analysis showed that weight-bearing MLA measurements vary significantly from non-weight-bearing MLA measurements. Differences were more severe in patients with mediolateral instability (p = 0.010), age (p = 0.049) and ≥3° varus or valgus alignment (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

The clinical importance of this study lies in the finding that there are within-person differences between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing measurement modalities. This has implications for preoperative planning, performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and clinical follow-up after TKA surgery using CAS navigation or patient-specific instrumentation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Computer-Assisted Navigation in High Tibial Osteotomy

Computer-assisted navigation is used to improve the accuracy and precision of correction angles during high tibial osteotomy. Most studies have reported that this technique reduces the outliers of coronal alignment and unintended changes in the tibial posterior slope angle. However, more sophisticated studies are necessary to determine whether the technique will improve the clinical results and long-term survival rates. Knowledge of the navigation technology, surgical techniques and potential pitfalls, the clinical results of previous studies, and understanding of the advantages and limitations of the computer-assisted navigation are crucial to successful application of this new technique in high tibial osteotomy. Herein, we review the evidence concerning this technique from previous studies.

Dynamic knee behaviour: does the knee deformity change as it is flexed-an assessment and classification with computer navigation

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the kinematics of arthritic knees prior to TKA. The hypothesis was that the arthritic knee follows distinct patterns with regard to deformity in coronal plane as it flexes from extended position.

METHOD

Data from 585 consecutive arthritic knees that had undergone TKA using two non-image-based navigation systems were included in the study. Coronal plane alignment given by the femoro-tibial mechanical angle (FTMA) was recorded in extension, 30°, 60°, 90° and maximum flexion prior to making any bony cuts or ligamentous releases.

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 512 (87.5 %) of arthritic knees. It was found that pre-implant arthritic knees behaved in different distinct patterns from full extension to 90° flexion. These patterns in FTMA from extension through to 90° of flexion were classified into 4 major types (1, 2, 3, and 4) and 8 subgroups (1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3, 4A, 4B, 4C) for varus and valgus knees. Beyond 90° of flexion, there were no distinct or consistent patterns. There were differences between varus and valgus knee deformities not only in overall numbers (73.8 % varus vs. 21.1 % valgus) but also in kinematic behaviour. Only 14.1 % of total knees had a consistent deformity (Type 1A) which remained the same throughout the range of flexion. 14.1 % knees actually become opposite deformity as the knee flexes; thus, varus becomes valgus and valgus becomes varus as the knee flexes (Type 3 and 4C).

CONCLUSION

This study has observed and categorised distinct patterns which arthritic knees follow in the coronal plane as it flexes. This dynamic change during flexion will have bearing on collateral releases that are traditionally done based on deformity in extension or 90° flexion mainly. This may be the underlying cause of flexion instability especially for Types 3 and 4C knees if collateral soft tissue release is done based on deformity in extension. Full significance of this remains unknown and will need further investigation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Postoperative Increased Loading Leads to an Alteration in the Radiological Mechanical Axis After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Standing long-leg radiographs allow assessment of the mechanical axis in the frontal plane before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). An alteration in loading, and hence in the forces acting on the knee joint, occurs postoperatively. We therefore postulated that the mechanical axis measured in the long-leg standing radiograph would change within the first year after TKA.

METHODS

Standing long-leg radiographs of 156 patients were performed 7 days, 3 months, and 12 months after TKA with determination of mechanical axis of the lower limb.

RESULTS

Seven days after surgery, the mechanical axis amounted 0.8° ± 1.7° valgus. Three months after the operation, at 1.3° ± 1.3° varus, it was significantly different (P < .001) from the primary measurement. No further alteration in the mechanical axis occurred during the first year after TKA. This difference was even more pronounced (P < .001) in patients with a postoperative lack of complete extension. Seven days after surgery, they had a valgus axis deviation of 1.6° ± 1.6°; after 3 months, the measurement amounted 1.2° ± 1.3° varus.

CONCLUSION

Measured by a standing long-leg radiograph, the frontal mechanical axis after TKA changes over time. The predictive power of a standing long-leg radiograph in the first week after surgery is limited because limb loading is altered because of pain and is therefore nonphysiological. The actual mechanical axis resulting after TKA can only be assessed in a standing long-leg radiograph at physiological loading.

Reliable Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty by the Use of an iPod-Based Navigation System

Axial alignment is one of the main objectives in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) is more accurate regarding limb alignment reconstruction compared to the conventional technique. The aim of this study was to analyse the precision of the innovative navigation system DASH® by Brainlab and to evaluate the reliability of intraoperatively acquired data. A retrospective analysis of 40 patients was performed, who underwent CAS TKA using the iPod-based navigation system DASH. Pre- and postoperative axial alignment were measured on standardized radiographs by two independent observers. These data were compared with the navigation data. Furthermore, interobserver reliability was measured. The duration of surgery was monitored. The mean difference between the preoperative mechanical axis by X-ray and the first intraoperatively measured limb axis by the navigation system was 2.4°. The postoperative X-rays showed a mean difference of 1.3° compared to the final navigation measurement. According to radiographic measurements, 88% of arthroplasties had a postoperative limb axis within ±3°. The mean additional time needed for navigation was 5 minutes. We could prove very good precision for the DASH system, which is comparable to established navigation devices with only negligible expenditure of time compared to conventional TKA.

Inter-observer reliability of measurements performed on digital long-leg standing radiographs and assessment of validity compared to 3D CT-scan

BACKGROUND

Long-leg radiographs (LLR) are often used in orthopaedics to assess limb alignment in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there are still concerns about the adequacy of measurements performed on LLR. We assessed the reliability and validity of measurements on LLR using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT)-scan as a gold standard.

METHODS

Six different surgeons measured the mechanical axis and position of the femoral and tibial components individually on 24 LLR. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to obtain reliability and Bland-Altman plots were constructed to assess agreement between measurements on LLR and measurements on 3D CT-scan.

RESULTS

ICC agreement for the six observer measurements on LLR was 0.70 for the femoral component and 0.80 for the tibial component. The mean difference between measurements performed on LLR and 3D CT-scan was 0.3° for the femoral component and -1.1° for the tibial component. Variation of the difference between LLR and 3D CT-scan for the femoral component was 1.1° and 0.9° for the tibial component. 95% of the differences between measurements performed on LLR and 3D CT-scan were between -1.9 and 2.4° (femoral component) and between -2.9 and 0.7 (tibial component).

CONCLUSION

Measurements on LLR show moderate to good reliability and, when compared to 3D CT-scan, show good validity.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

institutional review board Atrium-Orbis-Zuyd, number: 11-T-15.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective cohort study, Level II.

Does Implant Design Influence the Accuracy of Patient Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty?

PSI software adjusts preoperative planning to accommodate differences in implant design. Such adjustments may influence the accuracy of intraoperative jig placement, bone resection, or component placement. Our purpose was to determine whether implant design influences PSI accuracy. 96 and 123 PSI TKA were performed by a single surgeon using two different implant systems and identical PSI software. Femoral coronal alignment outliers were greater for Implant 1 (23.9% Implant 1 vs. 13.4% Implant 2; P=0.050). Tibial coronal alignment outliers were greater for Implant 2 (10.9% Implant 1 vs. 22.7% Implant 2; P=0.025). There was no difference in overall mechanical axes. Differences in implant design can influence bone resection and component alignment. PSI software rationale must align with surgeons' intraoperative goals.

The Valgus Stress Radiograph Does Not Determine the Full Extent of Correction of Deformity Prior to Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Routine preoperative stress radiographs have been advocated, in part, to determine "full correctability" of deformities before proceeding with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) despite limited data supporting their utility. Fifty consecutive patients undergoing medial UKA with robotic navigation were studied. In 20° of flexion, significantly greater correctability was achieved after removal of osteophytes by an additional 1.8°, with a mean corrected alignment of 2.5° varus. Seventy-four percent of knees were not correctable to neutral alignment or more. In conclusion, preoperative stress radiographs have overstated value in patients undergoing medial UKA since the full extent of correctability of varus deformity cannot be determined until after removal of osteophytes and since most deformities are not fully correctable to neutral in UKA.

Intra-operative deviation in limb alignment occurring at implantation in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival of knee replacement depends on accurate alignment. Despite improvements in cut accuracy mal-alignment of 3° or more is still seen. All methods share common implantation techniques. This study examines the effect of implantation on overall limb alignment relating it to cut alignment and trial alignment.

METHODS

A retrospective review of navigated primary knee replacements was undertaken (n=113). Overall coronal limb alignments for the aggregated cuts, trial and final implanted components were examined.

RESULTS

All 113 knees had coronal aggregated cut alignment within 2° of neutral (range: 2° varus to 2° valgus). With trial components 99 knees (88%) had an overall coronal limb alignment within 2° of neutral (range: 3° varus to 4° valgus). After final implantation 106 knees (94%) were within 2° of neutral (range: 4° varus to 4° valgus). Forty eight knees (42%) showed no alignment deviation occurring between trial and the final implanted prostheses and 16 knees (14%) shoed a deviation of 2° or more. There was a correlation of both aggregated cut (r=0.284, p=0.002) and trial (r=0.794, p<0.001) with final alignment. There was no significant difference between the final alignment and the aggregated cut alignment(mean difference=-0.15°, p=0.254) or trial alignment (mean difference -0.13°, p=0.155).

CONCLUSIONS

Even when the aggregated alignment produced by the bone cuts is accurate, inaccuracy in final alignment can result from the implantation process. It may be productive for surgeons to concentrate on the implantation process to improve alignment and reduce outliers.

Quantitative measurement of lower limb mechanical alignment and coronal knee laxity in early flexion

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive quantification of lower limb alignment using navigation technology is now possible throughout knee flexion owing to software developments. We report the precision and accuracy of a non-invasive system measuring mechanical alignment of the lower limb including coronal stress testing of the knee.

METHODS

Twelve cadaveric limbs were tested with a commercial invasive navigation system against the non-invasive system. Coronal mechanical femorotibial (MFT) alignment was measured with no stress, then 15 Nm varus and valgus applied moments. Measurements were recorded at 10° intervals from extension to 90° flexion. At each flexion interval, coefficient of repeatability (CR) tested precision within each system, and limits of agreement (LOA) tested agreement between the two systems. Limits for CR & LOA were set at 3° based on requirements for surgical planning and evaluation.

RESULTS

Precision was acceptable throughout flexion in all conditions of stress using the invasive system (CR ≤ 1.9°). Precision was acceptable using the non-invasive system from extension to 50° flexion (CR ≤ 2.4°), beyond which precision was unacceptable (> 3.4°). With no coronal stress applied, agreement remained acceptable from extension to 40° (LOA ≤ 2.4°), and when 15 Nm varus or valgus stress was applied agreement was acceptable from extension to 30° (LOA ≤ 2.9°). Higher angles of knee flexion had a negative impact on precision and accuracy.

CONCLUSION & CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The non-invasive system provides reliable quantitative data in-vitro on coronal MFT alignment and laxity in the range relevant to assessment of collateral ligament injury, pre-operative planning of arthroplasty and flexion instability following arthroplasty. In-vivo validation should be performed.

Agreement between radiological and computer navigation measurement of lower limb alignment

PURPOSE

Accurate and reproducible measurements of limb alignment are necessary for planning, performing and evaluation of reconstructive knee surgery. Aim of this study was the comparison of the alignment measured on long-leg standing radiographs with the intraoperative data from a navigation system.

METHODS

The records of 135 consecutive patients who received computer-assisted TKA were examined. Technical quality of the long-leg radiographs (LLRs) was classified good, acceptable or poor according to the rotation of the leg. The difference between radiographic and navigation measurements of leg alignment was assessed.

RESULTS

Preoperative LLRs were rated as good 56.3% (71.1% postoperatively), acceptable in 37.0% (20.0% postoperatively) and poor in 6.7% (8.9% postoperatively). The median difference between radiographic and navigation measurements increased with reduced quality of the LLR [good 1.5° (range 0.0°-9.9°), acceptable 2.5° (range 0.0°-15.0°), poor 4.5° (range 0.2°-9.5°)], but not with greater deformity. Median difference between both measurements in good radiographs was 1.7° (range 0.0°-9.9°) preoperatively and 1.2° (range 0.0°-7.0°) postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Difference between radiographic and navigation measurements of lower limb alignment is low if the LLR are obtained in neutral rotation. Larger differences between both measurements can occur even under these ideal conditions, and it is still unclear which measurement is closer to reality. Therefore, even if a navigation system is used during surgery, long-leg standing radiographs should currently not be abandoned.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment achieved with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific instruments in TKA: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Patient-specific instrumentation in TKA has the proposed benefits of improving coronal and sagittal alignment and rotation of the components. In contrast, the literature is inconsistent if the use of patient-specific instrumentation improves alignment in comparison to conventional instrumentation. Depending on the manufacturer, patient-specific instrumentation is based on either MRI or CT scans. However, it is unknown whether one patient-specific instrumentation approach is more accurate than the other and if there is a potential benefit in terms of reduction of duration of surgery.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We compared the accuracy of MRI- and CT-based patient-specific instrumentation with conventional instrumentation and with each other in TKAs. The three approaches also were compared with respect to validated outcomes scores and duration of surgery.

METHODS

A randomized clinical trial was conducted in which 90 patients were enrolled and divided into three groups: CT-based, MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation, and conventional instrumentation. The groups were not different regarding age, male/female sex distribution, and BMI. In all groups, coronal and sagittal alignments were measured on postoperative standing long-leg and lateral radiographs. Component rotation was measured on CT scans. Clinical outcomes (Knee Society and WOMAC scores) were evaluated preoperatively and at a mean of 3 months postoperatively and the duration of surgery was analyzed for each patient. MRI- and CT-based patient-specific instrumentation groups were first compared with conventional instrumentation, the patient-specific instrumentation groups were compared with each other, and all three approaches were compared for clinical outcome measures and duration of surgery.

RESULTS

Compared with conventional instrumentation MRI- and CT-based patient-specific instrumentation showed higher accuracy regarding the coronal limb axis (MRI versus conventional, 1.0° [range, 0°-4°] versus 4.5° [range, 0°-8°], p < 0.001; CT versus conventional, 3.0° [range, 0°-5°] versus 4.5° [range, 0°-8°], p = 0.02), femoral rotation (MRI versus conventional, 1.0° [range, 0°-2°] versus 4.0° [range, 1°-7°], p < 0.001; CT versus conventional, 1.0° [range, 0°-2°] versus 4.0° [range, 1°-7°], p < 0.001), and tibial slope (MRI versus conventional, 1.0° [range, 0°-2°] versus 3.5° [range, 1°-7°], p < 0.001; CT versus conventional, 1.0° [range, 0°-2°] versus 3.5° [range, 1°-7°], p < 0.001), but the differences were small. Furthermore, MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation showed a smaller deviation in the postoperative coronal mechanical limb axis compared with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation (MRI versus CT, 1.0° [range, 0°-4°] versus 3.0° [range, 0°-5°], p = 0.03), while there was no difference in femoral rotation or tibial slope. Although there was a significant reduction of the duration of surgery in both patient-specific instrumentation groups in comparison to conventional instrumentation (MRI versus conventional, 58 minutes [range, 53-67 minutes] versus 76 minutes [range, 57-83 minutes], p < 0.001; CT versus conventional, 63 minutes [range, 59-69 minutes] versus 76 minutes [range, 57-83 minutes], p < .001), there were no differences in the postoperative Knee Society pain and function and WOMAC scores among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study supports that patient-specific instrumentation increased accuracy compared with conventional instrumentation and that MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation is more accurate compared with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation regarding coronal mechanical limb axis, differences are only subtle and of questionable clinical relevance. Because there are no differences in the long-term clinical outcome or survivorship yet available, the widespread use of this technique cannot be recommended.

Intramedullary control of distal femoral resection results in precise coronal alignment in TKA

INTRODUCTION

There is still a relevant rate of outliers in coronal alignment >3° when the conventional technique is used, potentially accompanied by a poorer long-term clinical outcome and a reduced longevity of the implant. Intraoperative implementation of preoperative planning and above all checking of the bone resections carried out are decisive for reinstating a straight leg axis. Intramedullary control of femoral resection has not been described to date. The objective of this study was to present a new technique for the intramedullary control of femoral resection and the results obtained using this method.

METHODS

All patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty with the new intramedullary control of femoral resection were included in this retrospective study. The frequency of the need for correction of the saw cuts was documented. The radiological assessment included pre- and postoperative whole-leg standing radiographs. In the process, the whole-leg axis, AMA, entry point, LDFA and MPTA were evaluated preoperatively. On the postoperative radiographs, the whole-leg axis and the alignment of the femoral and tibial components were evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-two total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were included in the study. The average age was 68.7 years. The preoperative malalignment was on the average 8.2° ± 4.7° (23.8° varus to 17.3° valgus). The postoperative whole-leg axis was on the average 1.3° ± 1.1° (5.5° varus to 4.3° valgus). The femoral component showed a deviation from the mechanical axis of 0.1° ± 1.2° (4.3° varus to 3.7° valgus) and the tibial component a deviation from the mechanical tibial axis of 0.3° ± 1.2° (4.2° varus to 2.5° valgus).

CONCLUSIONS

The new technique of intramedullary control of distal femoral resection, together with preoperative planning, leads to a precise alignment of the femoral component in the coronal plane. Thus, for the first time, a simple and effective tool for checking distal femoral resection is available for standardized use.

Total knee arthroplasty with computer-assisted navigation: an analysis of 200 cases

Objective

to evaluate the results from surgery with computer-assisted navigation in cases of total knee arthroplasty.

Method

a total of 196 patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty with computer-assisted navigation were evaluated. The extension and flexion spaces (gaps) were evaluated during the operation and the alignment after the operation was assessed. The Knee Society Score (KSS) questionnaire for assessing patient's function was applied preoperatively and postoperatively after a mean follow-up of 22 months.

Results

in all, 86.7% of the patients presented good alignment of the mechanical axis (less than 3° of varus or valgus in relation to the mechanical axis) and 96.4% of the patients presented balanced flexion and extension gaps. Before the operation, 97% of the patients presented poor or insufficient KSS, but after the operation, 77.6% presented good or excellent KSS.

Conclusion

the navigation system made it possible to achieve aligned and balanced implants, with notable functional improvement among the patients. It was found to be useful in assessing, understanding and improving knowledge in relation to performing arthroplasty procedures.

The influence of leg length difference on clinical outcome after revision TKA

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this paper was to document the incidence of leg length changes after revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and its effect on clinical outcome.

METHODS

Leg length difference (LLD) was prospectively measured in 85 patients using digital standing full leg radiography before and after revision TKA. Additionally the patient's subjective perception of LLD was assessed postoperatively. Linear regression models were used to study the correlation between each of these parameters and the clinical outcome after 1 year. Clinical outcome was evaluated by means of the Knee Society Score (KSS).

RESULTS

Revision TKA resulted on average in an increased leg length of 5.3 mm. Sixty-five legs (76%) were lengthened with the procedure, 17 (20%) were shortened and three (4%) remained of identical length. Increased leg length after revision was positively correlated with clinical outcome at 3 months (Spearman r=0.22, p=0.044) and 1 year (Spearman r=0.26, p=0.027). The evidence for this correlation remained after correction for age, gender and diagnosis (p=0.012). The most important contributors to improved clinical outcome scores were improved pain score (Spearman r=0.19, p=0.09) and increased stability (Spearman r=0.13, p=0.24), rather than range of motion (Spearman r=-0.02, p=0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

The results from our work indicate that revision TKA tends to lengthen the leg by approximately 5mm. Contrary to what might be expected, leg lengthening after revision TKA is correlated with improved clinical outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2b.

Three-dimensional implant position and orientation after total knee replacement performed with patient-specific instrumentation systems

Patient-specific instrumentation systems are entering into clinical practice in total knee replacement, but validation tests have yet to determine the accuracy of replicating computer-based plans during surgery. We performed a fluoroscopic analysis to assess the final implant location with respect to the corresponding preoperative plan. Forty-four patients were analyzed after using a patient-specific system based on CT and MRI. Computer aided design implant models and models of the femur and tibia bone portions, as for the preoperative plans, were provided by the manufacturers. Two orthogonal fluoroscopic images of each knee were taken after surgery for pseudo-biplane imaging; 3D component locations with respect to the corresponding bones were estimated by a shape-matching technique. Assuming that the corresponding values at the preoperative plan were equal to zero, discrepancies were taken as an indication of accuracy for the systems. A repeatability test revealed that the technique was reliable within 1 mm and 1°. The maximum discrepancies for all the patients for the femoral component were 5.9 mm in a proximo-distal direction and 4.2° in flexion. Good matching was found between final implantations and preoperative plans with mean discrepancies smaller than 3.1 mm and 1.9°.

Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted surgery, and manual instrumentation: a short-term follow-up study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed with patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted surgery (CAS), and manual instruments at short-term follow-up.

METHODS

122 TKAs were performed by a single surgeon: 42 with PSI, 38 with CAS, and 40 with manual instrumentation. Preoperative, 1-month, and 6-month clinical and functional outcomes were measured using the Knee Society scoring system (knee score, function score, range of motion, and pain score). Improvements in clinical and functional outcomes from the preoperative to postoperative period were analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were measured to evaluate limb and component alignment.

RESULTS

Preoperative, 1-month postoperative, and 6-month postoperative knee scores, function scores, range of motion, and pain scores were highest in the PSI group compared to CAS and manual instrumentation. At 6-month follow-up, PSI TKA was associated with a statistically significant improvement in functional score when compared to manual TKA. Otherwise, there were no statistically significant differences in improvements among PSI, CAS, and manual TKA groups.

CONCLUSION

The higher preoperative scores in the PSI group limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions from the raw postoperative scores, but analyzing the changes in scores revealed that PSI was associated with a statistically significant improvement in Knee Society Functional score at 6-month post-TKA as compared to CAS or manual TKA. This may be attributable to improvements in component rotation and positioning, improved component size accuracy, or other factors that are not discernible on plain radiograph.

Does the severity of preoperative varus deformity influence postoperative alignment in both conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty?

PURPOSE

The postoperative alignment was compared according to the severity of preoperative varus deformity in computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty (CAS-TKA).

METHODS

The study reviewed 127 consecutive CAS-TKA and 236 conventional TKA, retrospectively. In CAS-TKA, 77 knees with a varus deformity ≤15.0° were classified in group CAS-A and 50 knees with a varus deformity >15.0° were classified in group CAS-B. In conventional groups, 204 knees with a varus deformity ≤15.0 were classified in group Conventional-A and 32 knees with a varus deformity >15.0° were classified in group Conventional-B. The postoperative mechanical axis (MA) was compared among groups CAS-A, CAS-B, Conventional-A and Conventional-B.

RESULTS

The average postoperative MA was 0.7° varus in group CAS-A, 2.8° varus in group CAS-B, 1.1° varus in group Conventional-A and 3.2° varus in group Conventional-B (p < 0.001). The postoperative MA was within 3° in 81.8, 62.0, 58.8 and 37.5 % of group CAS-A, CAS-B, Conventional-A and Conventional-B, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of preoperative varus deformity influences postoperative alignment despite using CAS. More careful correction of the alignment is required, especially in TKA performed on patients with a greater varus deformity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

No difference between computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year results of a prospective randomised study

PURPOSE

The use of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) results in better limb and implant alignment compared to conventional TKA; however, it is unclear whether this translates to better mid- to long-term clinical outcome. This prospective randomised study comparing CAS and conventional TKA reports the functional and patient perceived outcomes at a follow-up of 5 years. The hypothesis was that there would be a difference in functional outcome or quality of life after mid-term follow-up.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients were available for physical and radiological examination at 5 years. The Knee Society Score (KSS) was used to describe functional outcome and the Euroquol questionnaire for quality of life.

RESULTS

The mean total KSS for the CAS group improved from 91.1 (SD 22.3) points preoperatively to 157.4 (SD 21.9) and 150.2 (SD 30.4) points at 2 and 5 years, respectively. In the conventional group, the mean total KSS was 99.6 (SD 18.6) points preoperatively and 151.1 (SD 26.0) and 149.0 (SD 28.0) points at 2 and 5 years, respectively. The mean quality of life score improved from 48.2 (SD 16.5) points preoperatively to 67.4 (SD 16.3) and 66.8 (SD 22.2) points at 2 and 5 years in the CAS group, and from 52.2 (SD 17.1) points preoperatively to 65.6 (SD 14.6) and 61.7 (SD 19.3) points at 2 and 5 years, respectively, in the conventional TKA group. These differences were not statistically significant. There were radiolucent lines up to 2 mm in 11 knees (four CAS, seven conventional), but there were no changes in implant position.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in functional or patient perceived outcome after mid-term follow-up in this study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Computer-assisted navigation in orthopedic surgery

Computer-assisted navigation has a role in some orthopedic procedures. It allows the surgeons to obtain real-time feedback and offers the potential to decrease intra-operative errors and optimize the surgical result. Computer-assisted navigation systems can be active or passive. Active navigation systems can either perform surgical tasks or prohibit the surgeon from moving past a predefined zone. Passive navigation systems provide intraoperative information, which is displayed on a monitor, but the surgeon is free to make any decisions he or she deems necessary. This article reviews the available types of computer-assisted navigation, summarizes the clinical applications and reviews the results of related series using navigation, and informs surgeons of the disadvantages and pitfalls of computer-assisted navigation in orthopedic surgery.

The long leg radiograph is a reliable method of assessing alignment when compared to computer-assisted navigation and computer tomography

BACKGROUND

The mechanical alignment of the knee is an important factor in planning for, and subsequently assessing the success of a knee replacement. It is most commonly measured using a long-leg anteroposterior radiograph (LLR) encompassing the hip, knee and ankle. Other modalities of measuring alignment include computer tomography (CT) and intra-operative computer navigation (Cas). Recent studies comparing LLRs to Cas in measuring alignment have shown significant differences between the two and have hypothesized that Cas is a more accurate modality. This study aims to investigate the accuracy of the above mentioned modalities.

METHODOLOGY

A prospective study was undertaken comparing alignment as measured by long-leg radiographs and computer tomography to intra-operative navigation measurements in 40 patients undergoing a primary total knee replacement to test this hypothesis. Alignment was measured three times by three observers. Intra- and inter-observer correlation was sought between modalities.

RESULTS

Intra-observer correlation was excellent in all cases (>0.98) with a coefficient of repeatability <1.1°. Inter-observer correlation was also excellent measuring >0.960 using LLRs and >0.970 using CT with coefficient of repeatability <2.8°. Inter-modality correlation proved to be higher when comparing LLRs and CT (>0.893), than when comparing either of these modalities with Cas (>0.643 and >0.671 respectively). Pre-operative values had the greatest variability.

CONCLUSION

Given its availability and reduced radiation dose when compared to CT, LLRs should remain the mainstay of measuring the mechanical alignment of the lower limb, especially post-operatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Accuracy of image-free computer navigated total knee arthroplasty is not compromised in severely deformed varus knees

In severe varus knee deformity, image-free computer navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may result in a malaligned knee. The aim of this study was to compare the results of 17 severe varus knees (≥ 20°) and 81 varus knees (< 20°) that underwent image-free computer navigated TKA and analyze postoperative malalignment. Computer navigated TKA was performed according to standard protocol, and component angles and mechanical axes were evaluated postoperatively with weight bearing full-length standing radiographs. All severe varus knees were corrected to within 3° of neutral lower limb alignment despite having a mean preoperative varus deformities of 22.4°. Neutral alignment was obtained in 88.9% of the varus group (mean preoperative varus deformity of 11.7°), without significant difference between the two groups. No significant difference was found in either the femoral or tibial component angles, or in the frequency of complications. Severity of varus deformity did not affect the accuracy of image-free computer navigated TKA.

Computer-assisted versus manual TKA: no difference in clinical or functional outcomes at 5-year follow-up

The purpose of this study was to determine whether differences in clinical, functional, or radiographic outcomes existed at 5-year follow-up between patients who underwent computer-assisted or manual total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Seventy-eight consecutive TKAs were performed by a single surgeon who had extensive experience performing computer-assisted and manual TKA. The manual group (n=40) and computer-assisted group (n=38) were similar with regard to age, sex, diagnosis, body mass index, surgical technique, implants, perioperative management, Knee Society scores, and anteroposterior mechanical axis. Sixty-three (manual group, n=34; computer-assisted group, n=29) patients were available for final follow-up. At 5-year follow-up, no statistically significant differences were found in Knee Society knee score (P=.289), function score (P=.272), range of motion (P=.284), pain score (P=.432), or UCLA activity score (P=.109) between the 2 groups. Postoperative radiographs showed a significant difference in the mechanical axis (P=.004) between the 2 groups; however, both groups achieved a neutral mechanical axis of ±3° (computer-assisted group mean, 2.0°; manual group mean, -0.24°).When TKA was performed by an experienced surgeon, no significant difference was identified at 5-year follow-up between patients who underwent computer-assisted vs manual TKA.

Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may improve coronal alignment outliers; however, it is unclear whether navigated TKA improves the long-term clinical results of TKA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Does the literature contain evidence of better long-term function and lower revision rates with navigated TKA compared with conventional TKA?

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted of navigated TKA reviewing articles related to coronal alignment, clinical knee and function scores, cost, patient satisfaction, component rotation, anteroposterior and mediolateral stability, complications, and longer-term reports.

RESULTS

Coronal plane alignment is improved with navigated TKA with fewer radiographic outliers. We found limited evidence of improvements in any other variable, and function was not improved. The duration of surgery is increased and there are unique complications related to navigated TKA. The long-term benefits of additional increase in accuracy of alignment are not supported by any current evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings in reports of navigated TKA should be interpreted with caution. There are few short- and medium- and no long-term studies demonstrating improved clinical outcomes using navigated TKA. Despite substantial research, contradictory findings coupled with reservations about the cost and efficacy of the technology have contributed to the failure of computer navigation to become the accepted standard in TKA. Longer-term studies demonstrating improved function, lower revision rates, and acceptable costs are required before navigated TKA may be widely adopted. In the future, with improvements in study design, methodology, imaging, navigation technology, newer functional outcome tools, and longer-term followup studies, we suspect that navigated TKA may demonstrate yet unrecognized benefits.

The limits of precision in conventionally instrumented computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves the accuracy of component implantation. However, the final implant alignment may not match planned alignment. The hypothesis of this study is that although computer navigation improves alignment, imprecision may not be completely eliminated. The aim of the study was to establish the incidence and sources of imprecision during TKA using computer navigation to measure deviations from planned alignment.

METHODS

Computer navigation was used to quantify changes in planned alignment at four steps during 136 TKA's: application of cutting blocks, addition of definitive pin fixation, bone cuts and after prosthesis application. Mean changes in alignment deviation at each step in each plane were measured and the number of significant outliers (>3° from the planned resection plane) were assessed in each plane.

RESULTS

Overall changes in planned alignment were small and non-cumulative between steps but the incidence of outliers (cuts measured as >3° from planned alignment at each step) increased through the steps, with 21.3 % (n = 29) of final implants outlying in the tibial sagittal plane, which was the least precise plane. The highest number of outliers occurred after bone resection and the addition of pins to cutting blocks was also identified as a source of imprecision.

CONCLUSION

Despite improved accuracy of bone resection with computer-navigated TKA, the precision of bone cuts may be affected at several steps of the procedure. Cutting block application, bone resection and prosthesis application may all affect accuracy. Bone cuts should be made with meticulous care, whether navigated or not, and navigated cuts should be checked and corrected, particularly in the tibial sagittal plane.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.