1
|
Mace RA, Brewer JR, Cohen JE, Ly TV, Weaver MJ, Borsook D. Virtual Reality for Subacute Pain After Orthopedic Traumatic Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Mixed Methods Pilot Study. Clin J Pain 2024; 40:526-541. [PMID: 39016312 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Acute orthopedic traumatic musculoskeletal injuries are prevalent, costly, and often lead to persistent pain and functional limitations. Psychological risk factors (eg, pain catastrophizing and anxiety) exacerbate these outcomes but are often overlooked in acute orthopedic care. Addressing gaps in current treatment approaches, this mixed-methods pilot study explored the use of a therapeutic virtual reality (VR; RelieVRx ), integrating principles of mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral therapy, for pain self-management at home following orthopedic injury. METHODS We enrolled 10 adults with acute orthopedic injuries and elevated pain catastrophizing or pain anxiety from Level 1 Trauma Clinics within the Mass General Brigham health care system. Participants completed daily RelieVRx sessions at home for 8 weeks, which included pain education, relaxation, mindfulness, games, and dynamic breathing biofeedback. Primary outcomes were a priori feasibility, appropriateness, acceptability, satisfaction, and safety. Secondary outcomes were pre-post measures of pain, physical function, sleep, depression, and hypothesized mechanisms (pain self-efficacy, mindfulness, and coping). RESULTS The VR and study procedures met or exceeded all benchmarks. We observed preliminary improvements in pain, physical functioning, sleep, depression, and mechanisms. Qualitative exit interviews confirmed high satisfaction with RelieVRx and yielded recommendations for promoting VR-based trials with orthopedic patients. DISCUSSION The results support a larger randomized clinical trial of RelieVRx versus a sham placebo control to replicate the findings and explore mechanisms. There is potential for self-guided VR to promote evidence-based pain management strategies and address the critical mental health care gap for patients following acute orthopedic injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan A Mace
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Harvard Medical School
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | - Julie R Brewer
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | - Joshua E Cohen
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | - Thuan V Ly
- Harvard Medical School
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | - Michael J Weaver
- Harvard Medical School
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital
| | - David Borsook
- Harvard Medical School
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lopes A, Sampaio R, Tavares I. Pain, mindfulness, and placebo: a systematic review. Front Integr Neurosci 2024; 18:1432270. [PMID: 39267814 PMCID: PMC11390565 DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2024.1432270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Pain is a complex phenomenon influenced by psychosocial variables, including the placebo effect. The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) for pain has been demonstrated in experimental studies and systematic reviews, but the mechanisms of action are only starting to be established. Whether the expectations of individuals experiencing pain can be manipulated during MBIs remains to be systematically evaluated, and what role placebo effects might play remains to be explored. Methods To evaluate the literature analyzing placebo effects in MBIs for pain, we performed a systematic review based on searches conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases. Our search revealed a total of 272 studies, of which only 19 studies were included (10 acute pain and nine chronic pain), considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria related to expectations and placebo effects. Results From the 19 included studies, six measured placebo effects only in relation to the pharmacological intervention used in the study and not to an MBI. Discussion The results of the few studies that focused on the placebo effects of the MBIs indicate that placebo and expectations play a role in the MBIs' effects on pain. Although expectations and placebo effects are frequently discussed in the context of mindfulness and pain research, these results show that these factors are still not routinely considered in experimental designs. However, the results of the few studies included in this systematic review highlight a clear role for placebo and expectancy effects in the overall effects of MBIs for both acute and chronic pain, suggesting that routine measurement and further consideration in future studies are warranted. Additional research in this fascinating and challenging field is necessary to fully understand the connection between MBIs, placebo/expectations, and their effects on pain relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Lopes
- Department of Biomedicine, Unit of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Rute Sampaio
- Department of Biomedicine, Unit of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- CINTESIS-Centre for Health Technology and Services Research, Porto, Portugal
| | - Isaura Tavares
- Department of Biomedicine, Unit of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- IBMC-Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- I3S-Institute of Investigation and Innovation in Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Blackburn J. CORR Insights®: Surgeons Have an Implicit Preference for Specific Disease Over Nonspecific Illness. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2024; 482:656-658. [PMID: 38060212 PMCID: PMC10936996 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Blackburn
- Consultant Hand and Wrist Surgeon, Trauma and Orthopaedics, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aaron RV, Rassu FS, Wegener ST, Holley AL, Castillo RC, Osgood GM, Fisher E. Psychological treatments for the management of pain after musculoskeletal injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 2024; 165:3-17. [PMID: 37490624 PMCID: PMC10808265 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Musculoskeletal injury is a leading cause of pain and disability worldwide; 35% to 75% of people experience persistent pain for months and years after injury. Psychological treatments can reduce pain, functional impairment, and psychological distress but are not widely used after injury. This systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021236807) aimed to synthesize the literature testing psychological treatments for pain after musculoskeletal injury. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL from inception to May 2022. We extracted participant, treatment, and injury characteristics and primary (eg, pain intensity, functional impairment, depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms) and secondary (treatment feasibility and acceptability) outcomes. Twenty-four randomized controlled trials (N = 1966) were included. Immediately posttreatment, people who received psychological treatments (versus any control) reported lower pain intensity (standardized mean differences [SMD] = -0.25, 95% confidence interval [-0.49, -0.02]), functional impairment (SMD = -0.32 [-0.55, -0.09]), and symptoms of depression (SMD = -0.46 [-0.64, -0.29]), anxiety (SMD = -0.34 [-0.65, -0.04]), and PTSD (SMD = -0.43 [-0.70, -0.15]); at 6-month follow-up, only depression symptoms were significantly lower. Included trials varied widely in treatment and injury characteristics. The certainty of evidence was low or very low for most effects and heterogeneity moderate to substantial. Most studies had risk of bias domains judged to be high or unclear. Owing to very low certainty of results, we are unsure whether psychological therapies reduce pain and functional impairment after musculoskeletal injury; they may result in improved depression immediately posttreatment and at follow-up. More research is needed to identify treatments that result in enduring effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel V Aaron
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Fenan S Rassu
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Stephen T Wegener
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Amy L Holley
- Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health Sciences University School of Medicine, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Renan C Castillo
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Greg M Osgood
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Emma Fisher
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
- Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Support Care Review Group, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reangsing C, Trakooltorwong P, Maneekunwong K, Thepsaw J, Oerther S. Effects of online mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on anxiety symptoms in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Complement Med Ther 2023; 23:269. [PMID: 37507747 PMCID: PMC10386675 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-023-04102-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increasing number of studies have documented the effectiveness on various types of face-to-face and online mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) in reducing anxiety among general population, but there is a scarcity of systematic reviews evaluating evidence of online MBIs on anxiety in adults. Therefore, we examined the effects of online mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on anxiety symptoms in adults and explored the moderating effects of participant, methods, and intervention characteristics. METHODS We systematically searched nine databases through May 2022 without date restrictions. Inclusion criteria were primary studies evaluating online mindfulness-based interventions with adults with anxiety measured as an outcome, a comparison group, and written in English. We used random-effects model to compute effect sizes (ESs) using Hedges' g, a forest plot, and Q and I2 statistics as measures of heterogeneity; we also examined moderator analyses. RESULTS Twenty-six primary studies included 3,246 participants (39.9 ± 12.9 years old). Overall, online mindfulness-based interventions showed significantly improved anxiety (g = 0.35, 95%CI 0.09, 0.62, I2 = 92%) compared to controls. With regards to moderators, researchers reported higher attrition, they reported less beneficial effects on anxiety symptoms (β=-0.001, Qmodel=4.59, p = .032). No other quality indicators moderated the effects of online mindfulness-based interventions on anxiety. CONCLUSION Online mindfulness-based interventions improved anxiety symptoms in adult population. Thus, it might be used as adjunctive or alternative complementary treatment for adults. However, our findings must be interpreted with caution due to the low and unclear power of the sample in primary studies; hence, high-quality studies are needed to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Jintana Thepsaw
- School of Nursing, Mae Fah Laung University, Chiangrai, Thailand
| | - Sarah Oerther
- Trudy Busch Valentine, School of Nursing, Saint Louis University, Missouri, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cheng AL, Leo AJ, Calfee RP, Dy CJ, Armbrecht MA, Abraham J. What Are Orthopaedic Patients' and Clinical Team Members' Perspectives Regarding Whether and How to Address Mental Health in the Orthopaedic Care Setting? A Qualitative Investigation of Patients With Neck or Back Pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2023; 481:1415-1429. [PMID: 36480637 PMCID: PMC10263201 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Across virtually all orthopaedic subspecialties, symptoms of depression, anxiety, and unhelpful thinking are associated with worse patient-reported satisfaction with orthopaedic treatment and increased postoperative complications. In the orthopaedic community, there is growing interest in patients' mental health in the orthopaedic care setting, but addressing mental health is still not a focus of orthopaedic clinical training. There is a persistent awareness gap about how to address mental health in orthopaedic care in a manner that is simultaneously feasible in a busy orthopaedic practice and acceptable to patients who are presenting for treatment of a musculoskeletal condition. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) What are orthopaedic patients' and clinical team members' current perceptions and motivators regarding addressing mental health as part of orthopaedic care? (2) What barriers do patients and clinicians face regarding addressing mental health as part of orthopaedic care? (3) What are facilitators for patients and clinicians related to addressing mental health as part of orthopaedic care? (4) What are practical, acceptable implementation strategies to facilitate addressing mental health as part of orthopaedic care? METHODS This was a single-center, qualitative study conducted from January through May 2022 in the orthopaedic department of a large, urban, tertiary care academic medical center. Semistructured interviews were conducted with members of two stakeholder groups: orthopaedic patients and orthopaedic clinical team members. We interviewed 30 adult patients (of 85 patients who were eligible and approached) who had presented to our orthopaedic department for management of neck or back pain lasting for 3 or more months. By prescreening clinic schedules, patients were purposively sampled to include representatives from varied sociodemographic backgrounds and with a range of severity of self-reported symptoms of depression and anxiety (from none to severe on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Depression and Anxiety measures) (mean age 59 ± 14 years, 70% [21 of 30] women, 60% [18 of 30] White, median pain duration 3.3 [IQR 1.8 to 10] years). We also interviewed 22 orthopaedic clinicians and clinical support staff members (of 106 team members who were eligible and 25 who were approached). Team members were purposively sampled to include representatives from the full range of adult orthopaedic subspecialties and early-, mid-, and late-career physicians (11 of 22 were women, 16 of 22 were White, and 13 of 22 were orthopaedic surgeons). Interviews were conducted in person or via secure video conferencing by trained qualitative researchers. The interview guides were developed using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior model of behavior change. Two study team members used the interview transcripts for coding and thematic analysis, and interviews with additional participants from each stakeholder group continued until two study team members independently determined that thematic saturation of the components of the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior model had been reached. Each participant statement was coded as a perception, motivator, barrier, facilitator, or implementation strategy, and inductive coding was used to identify themes in each category. RESULTS In contrast to the perceptions of some orthopaedic clinicians, most patients with orthopaedic conditions expressed they would like their mental well-being to be acknowledged, if not addressed, as part of a thoughtful orthopaedic care plan. Motivation to address mental health was expressed the most strongly among orthopaedic clinical team members who were aware of high-quality evidence that demonstrated a negative impact of symptoms of depression and anxiety on metrics for which they are publicly monitored or those who perceived that addressing patients' mental health would improve their own quality of life. Barriers described by patients with orthopaedic conditions that were related to addressing mental health in the context of orthopaedic care included clinical team members' use of select stigmatizing words and perceived lack of integration between responses to mental health screening measures and the rest of the orthopaedic care encounter. Orthopaedic clinical team members commonly cited the following barriers: lack of available mental health resources they can refer patients to, uncertainty regarding the appropriateness for them to discuss mental health, and time pressure and lack of expertise or comfort in discussing mental health. Facilitators identified by orthopaedic clinical teams and patients to address mental health in the context of orthopaedic care included the development of efficient, adaptable processes to deliver mental health interventions that preferably avoid wasted paper resources; initiation of mental health-related discussion by an orthopaedic clinical team member in a compassionate, relevant context after rapport with the patient has been established; and the availability of a variety of affordable, accessible mental health interventions to meet patients' varied needs and preferences. Practical implementation strategies identified as suitable in the orthopaedic setting to increase appropriate attention to patients' mental health included training orthopaedic clinical teams, establishing a department or institution "mental health champion," and integrating an automated screening question into clinical workflow to assess patients' interest in receiving mental health-related information. CONCLUSION Orthopaedic patients want their mental health to be acknowledged as part of a holistic orthopaedic care plan. Although organization-wide initiatives can address mental health systematically, a key facilitator to success is for orthopaedic clinicians to initiate compassionate, even if brief, conversations with their patients regarding the interconnectedness of mental health and musculoskeletal health. Given the unique challenges to addressing mental health in the orthopaedic care setting, additional research should consider use of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design to identify effective methods of addressing mental health that are feasible and appropriate for this clinical setting. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Orthopaedic clinicians who have had negative experiences attempting to address mental health with their patients should be encouraged to keep trying. Our results suggest they should feel empowered that most patients want to address mental health in the orthopaedic care setting, and even brief conversations using nonstigmatizing language can be a valuable component of an orthopaedic treatment plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abby L. Cheng
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ashwin J. Leo
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ryan P. Calfee
- Division of Hand and Wrist, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Christopher J. Dy
- Division of Hand and Wrist, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Melissa A. Armbrecht
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Joanna Abraham
- Department of Anesthesiology & Institute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nien JT, Gill DL, Chou TY, Liu CS, Geng X, Hung TM, Chang YK. Effect of brief mindfulness and relaxation inductions on anxiety, affect and brain activation in athletes. PSYCHOLOGY OF SPORT AND EXERCISE 2023; 67:102422. [PMID: 37665875 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
The mindfulness-based intervention and psychological skills training are often used for maintaining the mental health or reducing undesirable mental states in athletes. However, their differences in acute effects on mental health and underlying neural mechanism are not well understood. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to examine the differential effects of brief mindfulness induction (MI) and relaxation induction (RI) on state anxiety, affect and brain activation. Thirty-five track and field athletes were recruited for this study. Using a within-subjects crossover design, participants underwent three conditions that incorporated two 30-min experimental conditions (i.e., MI or RI) and a control condition. State anxiety and affect were assessed before and after intervention, and brain activation (i.e., theta, alpha bands) were recorded by electroencephalography (EEG) during each 30-min condition. Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that MI and RI similarly reduced state anxiety and negative affect from pre-test to post-test compared to the control condition. In terms of positive affect, there were no significant differences among the three conditions across times. Furthermore, participants exhibited higher frontal theta power during the MI and RI than control condition, whereas no differences in alpha power were observed among conditions. The current study provides initial evidence from an electrophysiological perspective that brief MI and RI both improve the negative psychological states in individual sport athletes through similar neural mechanisms. Nevertheless, the moderating effects of training experiences and long-term interventions on mental state and EEG activity in athletes need further investigation in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jui-Ti Nien
- Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Diane L Gill
- Department of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, NC, USA
| | - Ting-Yin Chou
- Department of Sports Training Science-Athletics, National Taiwan Sport University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Shuo Liu
- Department of Sports Training Science-Combats, National Taiwan Sport University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Xiaoling Geng
- Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Min Hung
- Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Kai Chang
- Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute for Research Excellence in Learning Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zamri M, Lans J, Eberlin KR, Garg R, Jupiter JB, Chen NC. Reintervention, PROMs, and Factors Influencing PROMs Following Surgery for de Quervain's Tenosynovitis. J Hand Microsurg 2023; 15:165-174. [PMID: 37388568 PMCID: PMC10306984 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The aims of this study are to describe and identify the factors that influence patient reported outcomes following surgery of de Quervain's tenosynovitis. The secondary objective is to report the rate of reintervention following surgery of de Quervain's tenosynovitis. Patients and Methods Outcomes using the numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH), Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), the Patients Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS PI), and a custom de Quervain's questionnaire were obtained. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with patient-reported outcomes. Results Seventy-six patients who underwent de Quervain's release participated. The average age was 52.8 years (95% confidence interval: 49.6-56.1) and median follow-up age was 7.0 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.3-12.0). Outcomes were: NRS of pain was 0 (IQR: 0.0-3.0), the median QuickDASH was 6.82 (IQR: 0.00-28.41), the median PRWE score was 4.0 (IQR: 0.00-18.50), and the median PROMIS PI score was 43.90 (IQR: 38.70-53.90). Eighteen (23.7%) of the patients reported pain with thumb activities, four of whom had a reintervention. Additionally, 21 (26.9%) patients reported decreased strength in the thumb compared to the contralateral side, of which two underwent a reintervention. In total, eight patients underwent reintervention of which seven had a second surgery and one had a cortisone injection. Conclusion Roughly 1 in 20 patients following de Quervain's release undergoes reintervention. Patients with high PROMIS PI scores report poor surgical outcomes more frequently. Patients with high PROMIS PI scores report higher NRS pain scores ( p < 0.05), higher QuickDASH scores ( p < 0.05), and higher PRWE scores ( p < 0.05). In practice, careful consideration of PROMIS PI scores and psychosocial factors are recommended before considering reintervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meryam Zamri
- Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Division of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jonathan Lans
- Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Division of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Kyle R. Eberlin
- Hand Surgery Service, Division of Plastic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Rohit Garg
- Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Division of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Jesse B. Jupiter
- Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Division of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Neal C. Chen
- Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Division of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cornell C. CORR Insights®: What is the Association Between Clinically Diagnosed Psychiatric Illness and Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review Evaluating Outcomes, Healthcare Use, and Patient-reported Outcome Measures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2023; 481:965-966. [PMID: 36455102 PMCID: PMC10097576 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Cornell
- Orthopaedic Surgeon, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vadvilavičius T, Varnagirytė E, Jarašiūnaitė-Fedosejeva G, Gustainienė L. The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Police Officers' Stress Reduction: a Systematic Review. JOURNAL OF POLICE AND CRIMINAL PSYCHOLOGY 2023; 38:223-239. [PMID: 36741275 PMCID: PMC9885068 DOI: 10.1007/s11896-022-09570-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The profession of a police officer is associated with high levels of stress, which can have harmful consequences for officers' personal lives, the police organisation, and society. This systematic review aims to synthesise recent literature on the effectiveness of mindfulness-based intervention related to stress reduction (MBIs) in a sample of police officers. The search of relevant articles was applied in four databases (SpringerLink, Web of Science, Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCO), and PubMed), using the following inclusion criteria: (1) study involved police officers; (2) study used (quasi)experimental research design; (3) mindfulness-based stress reduction intervention was applied as the main intervention; and (4) study presented pre- and post-intervention measures and quantitative results of stress. The systematic review of eight articles included in the analysis revealed that MBIs were effective in reducing police officers' stress and other stress-related outcomes (sleep problems, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), negative affect, burnout).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadas Vadvilavičius
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Vytautas Magnus University, Jonavos St. 66/328, 44191 Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Erika Varnagirytė
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Vytautas Magnus University, Jonavos St. 66/328, 44191 Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Gabija Jarašiūnaitė-Fedosejeva
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Vytautas Magnus University, Jonavos St. 66/328, 44191 Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Loreta Gustainienė
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Vytautas Magnus University, Jonavos St. 66/328, 44191 Kaunas, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sagar I, Popok PJ, Reichman M, Lester EG, Doorley J, Bakhshaie J, Vranceanu AM. Orthopedic Providers’ Preferences for Education and Training on Psychosocial Clinical Research Initiatives: A Qualitative Investigation. J Patient Exp 2022; 9:23743735221092570. [PMID: 35450087 PMCID: PMC9016593 DOI: 10.1177/23743735221092570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Psychosocial factors (e.g., depression, anxiety) increase risk for
chronic pain, disability, and other health complications following acute
orthopedic traumatic injury. Orthopedic providers lack skills to address these
factors. Education around psychosocial factors of recovery and psychosocial
clinical and research initiatives could address this gap. The purpose of this
study was to understand orthopedic trauma providers’ preferences for the design
and distribution of educational materials to facilitate psychosocial initiative
implementation. Methods: We conducted live-video, semi-structured focus groups with outpatient
orthopedic trauma providers across three Level 1 Trauma Centers, using a hybrid
inductive-deductive approach to analyze qualitative data and extract themes and
subthemes characterizing providers’ recommendations for appropriate psychosocial
education. Results: Four themes described providers’ recommendations for receiving
educational materials: (1) provide foundational knowledge and tools about
psychosocial factors; (2) provide information regarding a psychosocial
initiative's purpose and procedures; (3) leverage educational materials to
maximize buy-in to psychosocial clinical research initiatives; and (4) deliver
information concisely, clearly, and electronically. Conclusion: Orthopedic providers recommended ways to optimize design and
dissemination of education on psychosocial care. Optimizing knowledge of
psychosocial factors and clinical and research initiatives facilitates
providers’ ability to appropriately target the often-underdressed psychosocial
component of recovery in orthopedics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabell Sagar
- Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Paula J. Popok
- Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mira Reichman
- Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ethan G. Lester
- Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James Doorley
- Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jafar Bakhshaie
- Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ana Maria Vranceanu
- Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Implementation of Online Behavior Modification Techniques in the Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11071806. [PMID: 35407414 PMCID: PMC8999801 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11071806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The main aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) was to assess the effectiveness of online behavior modification techniques (e-BMT) in the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Methods: We conducted a search of Medline (PubMed), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, APA PsychInfo, and Psychological and Behavioral Collections, from inception to the 30 August 2021. The main outcome measures were pain intensity, pain interference, kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing and self-efficacy. The statistical analysis was conducted using RStudio software. To compare the outcomes reported by the studies, we calculated the standardized mean difference (SMD) over time and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for the continuous variables. Results: Regarding pain intensity (vs. usual care/waiting list), we found a statistically significant trivial effect size in favor of e-BMT (n = 5337; SMD = −0.17; 95% CI −0.26, −0.09). With regard to pain intensity (vs. in-person BMT) we found a statistically significant small effect size in favor of in-person BMT (n = 486; SMD = 0.21; 95%CI 0.15, 0.27). With respect to pain interference (vs. usual care/waiting list) a statistically significant small effect size of e-BMT was found (n = 1642; SMD = −0.24; 95%CI −0.44, −0.05). Finally, the same results were found in kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, and self-efficacy (vs. usual care/waiting list) where we found a statistically significant small effect size in favor of e-BMT. Conclusions: e-BMT seems to be an effective option for the management of patients with musculoskeletal conditions although it does not appear superior to in-person BMT in terms of improving pain intensity.
Collapse
|
13
|
Effectiveness of Telematic Behavioral Techniques to Manage Anxiety, Stress and Depressive Symptoms in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19063231. [PMID: 35328917 PMCID: PMC8951553 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Anxiety, depressive symptoms and stress have a significant influence on chronic musculoskeletal pain. Behavioral modification techniques have proven to be effective to manage these variables; however, the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for an alternative to face-to-face treatment. We conducted a search of PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, APA PsychInfo, and Psychological and Behavioural Collections. The aim was to assess the effectiveness of telematic behavioral modification techniques (e-BMT) on psychological variables in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain through a systematic review with meta-analysis. We used a conventional pairwise meta-analysis and a random-effects model. We calculated the standardized mean difference (SMD) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Forty-one randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 5018 participants. We found a statistically significant small effect size in favor of e-BMT in depressive symptoms (n = 3531; SMD = -0.35; 95% CI -0.46, -0.24) and anxiety (n = 2578; SMD = -0.32; 95% CI -0.42, -0.21) with low to moderate strength of evidence. However, there was no statistically significant effect on stress symptoms with moderate strength of evidence. In conclusion, e-BMT is an effective option for the management of anxiety and depressive symptoms in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. However, it does not seem effective to improve stress symptoms.
Collapse
|
14
|
Sánchez‐Gutiérrez C, Gil‐García E, Rivera‐Sequeiros A, López‐Millán JM. Effectiveness of telemedicine psychoeducational interventions for adults with non‐oncological chronic disease: A systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2022; 78:1267-1280. [DOI: 10.1111/jan.15151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Sánchez‐Gutiérrez
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Virgen del Rocío Universitary Hospital Seville Spain
| | - Eugenia Gil‐García
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry University of Seville Seville Spain
| | - Adriana Rivera‐Sequeiros
- Department of Nursing Research and Innovation in Digital Health Virgen Macarena Universitary Hospital Seville Spain
| | - José M. López‐Millán
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Virgen Macarena Universitary Hospital Seville Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS GLOBAL RESEARCH AND REVIEWS 2021; 5:01979360-202105000-00016. [PMID: 34019498 PMCID: PMC8143759 DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-21-00027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The distinction between race and ethnicity should be carefully understood and described for demographic data collection. Racial healthcare differences have been observed across many orthopaedic subspecialties. However, the frequency of reporting and analyzing race and ethnicity in orthopaedic clinical trials has not been determined. Therefore, the primary purpose of this systematic review was to determine how frequently race and ethnicity are reported and analyzed in orthopaedic clinical trials. METHODS The top 10 journals by impact factor in the field of orthopaedics were manually screened from 2015 to 2019. All randomized controlled trials related to orthopaedics and assessing clinical outcomes were included. Eligible studies were evaluated for bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and for whether the trial reported and analyzed several demographics, including age, sex, height, weight, race, and ethnicity. The frequency of reporting and analyzing by each demographic was accessed. In addition, comparisons of reporting and analyzing race/ethnicity were made based on orthopaedic subspecialty and journal of publication. RESULTS A total of 15,488 publications were screened and 482 met inclusion criteria. Of these 482 trials, 460 (95.4%) reported age and 456 (94.6%) reported sex, whereas 35 (7.3%) reported race and 15 (3.1%) reported ethnicity for the randomized groups; 79 studies (16.4%) analyzed age and 72 studies (14.9%) analyzed sex, whereas 6 studies (1.2%) analyzed race and 1 study (0.2%) analyzed ethnicity. The orthopaedic subspecialty of spine was found to report race (23.5%) and ethnicity (17.6%) more frequently than all the other subspecialties, whereas sports medicine reported race and/or ethnicity in only 3 of 150 trials (2.0%). CONCLUSIONS Race and ethnicity are not frequently reported or analyzed in orthopaedic randomized controlled trials. Social context, personal challenges, and economic challenges should be considered while analyzing the effect of race and ethnicity on outcomes.
Collapse
|
16
|
Long-Term Outcomes after Surgical Treatment of Radial Sensory Nerve Neuromas: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Rate of Secondary Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 147:101-111. [PMID: 33002982 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000007437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to (1) describe long-term patient-reported outcomes of surgically treated symptomatic radial sensory nerve neuromas on function, pain interference, pain intensity, and satisfaction; (2) assess which factors were associated with worse function, higher pain intensity, and more pain interference; and (3) describe the secondary surgery rate and factors associated with secondary surgery. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of patients surgically treated for radial sensory nerve neuroma from 2002 to 2016 (n = 54). Twenty-five of these 54 patients completed a follow-up survey including the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity, pain interference, and depression scales; numerical rating scale pain and satisfaction instruments; and the global rating scale of change, at a mean period of 10.7 ± 4.3 years after neuroma surgery. RESULTS The mean PROMIS scores were 45.0 ± 12.1 for upper extremity, 55.5 ± 10.3 for pain interference, and 49.9 ± 10.2 for depression, and were within 1 SD of the general population. Eight patients (32 percent) reported symptoms as unchanged or worse following neuroma surgery. The median numerical rating scale pain was 3 (interquartile range, 1 to 6) and the global rating scale of change satisfaction was 10 (interquartile range, 7 to 10). Older patients (p = 0.002) and patients with higher PROMIS pain interference (p < 0.001), higher numerical rating scale for pain (p = 0.012), and lower global rating scale of change scores (p = 0.01) had worse PROMIS upper extremity scores. The secondary surgery rate was 20 percent and was associated with the presence of multiple neuromas (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Radial sensory nerve neuromas remain difficult to treat. They have a high secondary surgery rate (20 percent), with only 68 percent of patients reporting improvement after surgical intervention. Patient-reported outcomes after surgery are similar to conditions of the general population; however, the range of outcomes is wide.
Collapse
|
17
|
The Psychological Effects of Musculoskeletal Trauma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2021; 29:e322-e329. [PMID: 33475305 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-20-00637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Musculoskeletal injuries comprise a large percentage of hospital admissions for adults and often contribute to persistent daily pain as an illness; opioid dependence; disability; and complaints of increased depression, anxiety, and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder. The prevalence of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder after orthopaedic trauma has been found to be considerably greater than the general adult cohort. Soon after sustaining a fracture, psychological factors can predict pain and disability many months after injury, even after controlling for injury severity. Thus, early in the care of orthopaedic trauma, there exists an opportunity to improve overall health by attending to psychological and social concerns, along with physical health. Recent literature has identified clinically actionable subgroups within the orthopaedic trauma cohort that are at psychological risk after an injury. Improving positive factors such as resilience, social support, and self-efficacy via validated interventions such as Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, mindfulness training, and other types of mindset training has helped people return to their daily routine. Raising awareness of the psychological effects of trauma among the orthopaedic community could improve post-treatment planning, increase referrals to appropriate nonmedical professionals, and implement earlier effective interventions.
Collapse
|
18
|
What Factors Are Associated With Response Rates for Long-term Follow-up Questionnaire Studies in Hand Surgery? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478:2889-2898. [PMID: 32452929 PMCID: PMC7899400 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term follow-up studies are an important tool in the evaluation of orthopaedic illness and its treatment options. However, a patient's participation in a follow-up study may be affected by several factors, leading to variability in response rates and the risk of selection bias. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) What is the average response rate in hand surgery questionnaire studies? (2) What factors are associated with higher and lower response rates to research questionnaires? (3) What factors are associated with higher and lower contact, initial participation, and completion rates? METHODS We included 798 adult patients who were enrolled in one of 12 questionnaire follow-up studies in the hand and upper extremity service of our institution. All included studies evaluated patient-reported outcomes for the surgical treatment of upper extremity conditions using questionnaires and all used the same enrollment design. Patients were invited by letter to ask if they would be willing to participate, and we informed them that they would be contacted by telephone at least three times if they did not respond to the letter. Patients were contacted at a median of 6.6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 3.7 to 11) after surgery. The successful response rate was 49% (390 of 798 patients). We manually reviewed records to collect data on patient characteristics, and we performed bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with the contact rate (percentage of patients reached by either mail, phone, or email), initial response rate (percentage of reached patients who initiated participation), completion rate (percentage of patients who initiated participation and completed the entire follow-up questionnaire), and our primary outcome successful response rate (percentage of patients who were contacted and who completed the entire questionnaire). RESULTS The average response rate in hand surgery questionnaire studies was 49% (390 of 798 patients). In the multivariable analysis, enrollment of women (odds ratio 1.43 [95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.97]; p = 0.031) was independently associated with higher response rates. On the contrary, a longer follow-up time from surgery (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.92 to 0.99]; p = 0.015) and multiple researchers contacting patients (OR 0.51 [95% CI 0.37 to 0.71]; p < 0.001) were independently associated with lower response rates. The contact rate was higher for women (OR 1.46 [95% CI 1.03 to 2.06]; p = 0.034) and patients with higher income (OR 1.000007 [95% CI 1.000001 to 1.000013]; p = 0.019). The contact rate was lower in patients with a longer follow-up time from surgery (OR 0.93 [95% CI 0.90 to 0.97]; p = 0.001). The initial participation rate was lower when patients were contacted by multiple researchers (OR: 0.34 [95% CI 0.23 to 0.52]; p < 0.001). Studies with a lower number of questions (36; IQR 22 to 46) were completed more frequently than studies with a higher number of questions (51; IQR 39 to 67; p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS Studies assessing long-term outcomes that have a large proportion of men and longer follow-up time tend to have lower response rates. When performing a follow-up study, it seems beneficial to have one researcher contact the patients and use a shorter questionnaire. Results of this study can help clarify the response rates in hand surgery follow-up questionnaire studies and help with the planning of future follow-up studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II, prognostic study.
Collapse
|
19
|
Systematic scoping review of interactions between analgesic drug therapy and mindfulness-based interventions for chronic pain in adults: current evidence and future directions. Pain Rep 2020; 5:e868. [PMID: 33251471 PMCID: PMC7690768 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. None of the mindfulness-based clinical trials for chronic pain included in this review analyzed the interaction effects between mindfulness interventions and concomitant analgesic drug therapies. Most patients with chronic pain do not find adequate pain relief with a single treatment, and accumulating evidence points to the added benefits of rational combinations of different treatments. Given that psychological therapies, such as mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs), are often delivered in conjunction with concomitant analgesic drug therapies (CADTs), this systematic scoping review examines the evidence for any interactions between MBIs and CADTs. The protocol for this review has been published and registered. MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases were searched until July 2019. We included randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy of MBIs for the treatment of chronic pain. A total of 40 randomized controlled trials (2978 participants) were included. Thirty-nine of 40 (97.5%) included mindfulness-based clinical trials allowed the use of CADTs. However, only 6 of these 39 (15.4%) trials provided adequate details of what these CADTs were, and only 4 (10.3%) trials controlled for CADTs. Of great relevance to this review, none of the included trials analyzed the interactions between MBIs and the CADTs to determine whether they have an additive, synergistic, or antagonistic effect on chronic pain. Adverse events were inconsistently reported, and no judgment could be made about safety. Future trials assessing the interactions between MBIs and CADTs, with better harms reporting, are needed to better define the role of MBIs in the management of chronic pain.
Collapse
|
20
|
CORR Insights®: Delayed Diagnosis Is the Primary Cause of Sarcoma Litigation: Analysis of Malpractice Claims in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478:2254-2256. [PMID: 32769543 PMCID: PMC7491901 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
21
|
Kootstra TJM, Smeeing DPJ, Beks RB, Heijl MV, Kokke M, van der Velde D. Mindfulness in Patients with Upper-Extremity Conditions: A Summary of Existing Literature. J Hand Microsurg 2020; 12:S1-S8. [PMID: 33335364 PMCID: PMC7735556 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Mindfulness implies entering a mental state of awareness which allows for the reframing of an experience, and functionality has shown to be influenced by mindset. The aim of this systematic review was to assess effects of mindfulness in patients with upper-extremity conditions. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases were searched on June 19, 2019, for studies investigating mindfulness in patients with upper-extremity conditions. Two validated instruments for methodologic assessment were used to assess study quality. Studies that reported pain, psychological, or functional outcome measures were included. One randomized controlled trials and three observational studies were included, which together included 335 patients that completed final follow-up. The weighted average age was 52.4 years and 48% of the patients were male. Evaluation of the outcome measures used was immediately after the mindfulness intervention or assessment in all studies. Mindfulness appeared to be positively associated with less pain (though below the minimal clinically important difference), increased mood, and better function. Mindfulness is associated with increased mood and possibly better functionality in adults with a large range of upper-extremity conditions when measured or used as an intervention. Future researcher should expand the subject as only four studies were included in this review. This is a Level IV study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Reinier B. Beks
- Department of Surgery, Universitair Medisch Centrum, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mark van Heijl
- Department of Surgery, Universitair Medisch Centrum, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marike Kokke
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shires A, Sharpe L, Davies JN, Newton-John TRO. The efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions in acute pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 2020; 161:1698-1707. [PMID: 32701830 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Recent meta-analyses have shown mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) to be effective for chronic pain, but no pooled estimates of the effect of MBIs on acute pain are available. This meta-analysis was conducted to fill that gap. A literature search was conducted in 4 databases. Articles were eligible if they reported on randomized controlled trials of MBIs for people with acute pain and one of the following outcomes: pain severity, pain threshold, pain tolerance, or pain-related distress. Two authors independently extracted the data, assessed risk of bias, and provided GRADE ratings. Twenty-two studies were included. There was no evidence of an effect of MBIs on the primary outcome of pain severity in clinical {Hedges' g = 0.52; (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.241 to 1.280)} or experimental settings (Hedges' g = 0.04; 95% CI [-0.161 to 0.247]). There was a beneficial effect of MBIs on pain tolerance (Hedges' g = 0.68; 95% CI [0.157-1.282]) and pain threshold (Hedges' g = 0.72; 95% CI [0.210-1.154]) in experimental studies. There was no evidence of an effect of MBIs compared to control for pain-related distress in clinical (Hedges' g = 0.16; 95% CI [-0.018 to 0.419]) or experimental settings (Hedges' g = 0.44; 95% CI [-0.164 to 0.419]). GRADE assessment indicated that except for pain tolerance, the data were of low or very low quality. There is moderate evidence that MBIs are efficacious in increasing pain tolerance and weak evidence for pain threshold. However, there is an absence of good-quality evidence for the efficacy of MBIs for reducing the pain severity or pain-related distress in either clinical or experimental settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Shires
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Louise Sharpe
- School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Toby R O Newton-John
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bannon S, Lester EG, Gates MV, McCurley J, Lin A, Rosand J, Vranceanu AM. Recovering together: building resiliency in dyads of stroke patients and their caregivers at risk for chronic emotional distress; a feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2020; 6:75. [PMID: 32509320 PMCID: PMC7249683 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-020-00615-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A stroke is a sudden, life-altering event with potentially devastating consequences for survivors and their loved ones. Despite advances in endovascular and neurocritical care approaches to stroke treatment and recovery, there remains a considerable unmet need for interventions targeting the emotional impact of stroke for both patients and their informal caregivers. This is important because untreated emotional distress becomes chronic and negatively impacts quality of life in both patients and caregivers. Our team previously used mixed methods to iteratively develop a six-session modular dyadic intervention to prevent chronic emotional distress in patients with stroke and their informal caregivers called "Recovering Together" (RT) using feedback from dyads and the medical team. The aim of the current study is to test the feasibility of recruitment, acceptability of screening and randomization methods, acceptability of RT, satisfaction with RT, feasibility of the assessment process at all time points, and acceptability of outcome measures. Secondarily, we aimed to explore within-treatment effect sizes and change in clinically significant symptoms of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress (PTS). The larger goal was to strengthen methodological rigor before a subsequent efficacy trial. METHODS We conducted a feasibility randomized controlled trial to evaluate the RT intervention relative to minimally enhanced usual care (MEUC) in stroke patients admitted to a Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit (Neuro-ICU). Dyads were enrolled within 1 week of hospitalization if they met specific eligibility criteria. Assessments were done via paper and pencil at baseline, and electronically via REDCap or over the phone at post-intervention (approximately 6 weeks after baseline), and 3 months later. Assessments included demographics, resiliency intervention targets (mindfulness, coping, self-efficacy, and interpersonal bond), and emotional distress (depression, anxiety, and PTS). Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability markers. Secondary outcomes were depression, anxiety, PTS, mindfulness, coping, self-efficacy, and interpersonal bond. RESULTS We consented 20 dyads, enrolled 17, and retained 16. Although many patients were missed before we could approach them, very few declined to participate or dropped out once study staff made initial contact. Feasibility of enrollment (87% of eligible dyads enrolled), acceptability of screening, and randomization (all RT dyads retained after randomization) were excellent. Program satisfaction (RT post-test M = 11.33/12 for patients M = 12/12 for caregivers), and adherence to treatment sessions (six of seven RT dyads attending 4/6 sessions) were high. There were no technical difficulties that affected the delivery of the intervention. There was minimal missing data. For both patients and caregivers, participation in RT was generally associated with clinically significant improvement in emotional distress symptoms from baseline to post-test. Participation in MEUC was associated with clinically significant worsening in emotional distress. Although some of the improvement in emotional distress symptoms decreased in the RT group between post-test to 3 months, these changes were not clinically significant. RT was also associated with substantial decrease in frequency of individuals who met criteria for clinically significant symptoms, while the opposite was true for MEUC. There were many lessons that informed current and future research. CONCLUSIONS This study provided evidence of feasibility and signal of improvement in RT, as well as necessary methodological changes to increase recruitment efficiency before the future hybrid efficacy-effectiveness trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02797509.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Bannon
- Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, One Bowdoin Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA 02114 USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Ethan G. Lester
- Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, One Bowdoin Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA 02114 USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Melissa V. Gates
- Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, One Bowdoin Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - Jessica McCurley
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Cambridge St, Suite 1600, Boston, MA 02114 USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Ann Lin
- Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, One Bowdoin Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - Jonathan Rosand
- Henry and Allison McCance Center for Brain Health, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
- Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Ana-Maria Vranceanu
- Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, One Bowdoin Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA 02114 USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Babatunde FO, MacDermid J, Grewal R, Macedo L, Szekeres M. Development and Usability Testing of a Web-Based and Therapist-Assisted Coping Skills Program for Managing Psychosocial Problems in Individuals With Hand and Upper Limb Injuries: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Hum Factors 2020; 7:e17088. [PMID: 32374265 PMCID: PMC7240444 DOI: 10.2196/17088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Ineffective coping has been linked to prolonged pain, distress, anxiety, and depression after a hand and upper limb injury. Evidence shows that interventions based on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) may be effective in improving treatment outcomes, but traditional psychological interventions are resource intensive and unrealistic in busy hand therapy practices. Developing web-based, evidence-based psychological interventions specifically for hand therapy may be feasible in clinical practice and at home with reduced training and travel costs. Hand Therapy Online Coping Skills (HOCOS) is a program developed to supplement traditional hand therapy with therapist-assisted coping skills training based on principles from CBT and the Technology Acceptance Model. Objective This study aimed to describe the development and assess the usability of HOCOS to support hand therapists in the management of psychosocial problems. Methods The ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) of system design was applied to create HOCOS. The usability testing of HOCOS involved a 2-stage process. In the first step, heuristic testing with information and communications technology (ICT) experts was completed using two sets of heuristics: Monkman heuristics and the Health Literacy Online (HLO) checklist. The second step involved user testing with hand therapists performing a series of online and face-to-face activities, completing 12 tasks on the website using the think-aloud protocol, completing the system usability scale (SUS) questionnaire, and a semistructured feedback interview in 2 iterative cycles. Descriptive statistics and content analyses were used to organize the data. Results In total, 4 ICT experts and 12 therapists completed usability testing. The heuristic evaluation revealed 15 of 35 violations on the HLO checklist and 5 of 11 violations on the Monkman heuristics. Initially, hand therapists found 5 tasks to be difficult but were able to complete all 12 tasks after the second cycle of testing. The cognitive interview findings were organized into 6 themes: task performance, navigation, design esthetics, content, functionality and features, and desire for future use. Usability issues identified were addressed in two iterative cycles. There was good agreement on all items of the SUS. Overall, therapists found that HOCOS was a detailed and helpful learning resource for therapists and patients. Conclusions We describe the development and usability testing of HOCOS; a new web-based psychosocial intervention for individuals with a hand and upper limb injuries. HOCOS targets psychosocial problems linked to prolonged pain and disability by increasing access to therapist-guided coping skills training. We actively involved target users in the development and usability evaluation of the website. The final website was modified to meet the needs and preferences of the participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Folarin Omoniyi Babatunde
- School of Rehabilitation Science, Institute of Applied Health Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Joy MacDermid
- School of Rehabilitation Science, Institute of Applied Health Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Care London, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Department of Physical Therapy, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Ruby Grewal
- Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Care London, Western University, London, ON, Canada.,Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Luciana Macedo
- School of Rehabilitation Science, Institute of Applied Health Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Mike Szekeres
- Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Care London, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Jayakumar P, Teunis T, Vranceanu AM, Lamb S, Ring D, Gwilym S. Early Psychological and Social Factors Explain the Recovery Trajectory After Distal Radial Fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102:788-795. [PMID: 32379119 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.19.00100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This prospective study identified the association of demographic, injury, psychological, and social variables, measured early during recovery, with limitations in function (measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test [PROMIS UE]) at 6 to 9 months after a distal radial fracture. Additionally, we assessed variables associated with the PROMIS UE; the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH); the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE); and the 3-Level EuroQol 5 Dimensions Index (EQ-5D-3L) over time. METHODS A total of 364 adult patients (73% female), with a median age of 65 years (interquartile range, 45.5 to 77 years), who sustained an isolated distal radial fracture completed questionnaires at 3 time periods after the fracture: within 1 week, between 2 and 4 weeks, and between 6 and 9 months. We created a multivariable regression model and a generalized least squares random effects model, accounting for multicollinearity using correlation matrices, the variable inflation factor, and the partial R. RESULTS Multiple variables within a week of the injury correlated with 6 to 9-month limitations in bivariate analysis. Being retired (partial R = 0.19; p < 0.001), using opioids after the fracture (partial R = 0.04; p < 0.001), using antidepressants (partial R = 0.11; p < 0.001), greater pain interference (partial R = 0.03; p = 0.001), and greater pain catastrophization (partial R = 0.04; p = 0.002) within 1 week of the injury were strong predictors of greater limitations (PROMIS UE) at 6 to 9 months in multivariable analysis. Longitudinal analysis of variables over time demonstrated greater pain interference, greater fear of movement, lower self-efficacy, older age, and female sex as strong predictors of limitations. CONCLUSIONS Recovery from a distal radial fracture is influenced by a series of demographic, psychological, and social variables. Of these factors, being retired, using opioids, using antidepressants, greater pain interference, and greater pain catastrophization within a week of the injury explain the largest amounts of unique variance in self-perceived upper-extremity physical function. Evaluating the impact of change in variables over time underlined the influence of pain interference as well as the influence of fear of movement and self-efficacy (or resiliency) on limitations in physical function and general health. These findings have important implications for identifying individuals who can benefit from behavioral interventions for these psychological factors to optimize recovery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prakash Jayakumar
- The University of Texas at Austin and Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas
| | - Teun Teunis
- University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ana Maria Vranceanu
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sarah Lamb
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David Ring
- The University of Texas at Austin and Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas
| | - Stephen Gwilym
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
CORR Insights®: Patient Characteristics, Treatment, and Presenting PROMIS Scores Associated with Number of Office Visits for Traumatic Hand and Wrist Conditions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477:2356-2357. [PMID: 31135532 PMCID: PMC6999926 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
27
|
Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: What Role Does Positive Psychology Play in Understanding Pain Intensity and Disability Among Patients with Hand and Upper-extremity Conditions? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477:1765-1768. [PMID: 31335595 PMCID: PMC7000011 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
28
|
What Role Does Positive Psychology Play in Understanding Pain Intensity and Disability Among Patients with Hand and Upper Extremity Conditions? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019; 477:1769-1776. [PMID: 31107321 PMCID: PMC7000013 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A large body of research shows that psychologic distress and ineffective coping strategies substantially contribute to more severe pain and increased physical limitations among patients with orthopaedic disorders. However, little is known about the relationship between positive psychology (constructs that enable individuals to thrive and adapt to challenges) and pain and physical limitations in this population. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) Which positive-psychology factors (satisfaction with life, gratitude, coping through humor, resilience, mindfulness, and optimism) are independently associated with fewer upper-extremity physical limitations after controlling for the other clinical and demographic variables? (2) Which positive-psychology factors are independently associated with pain intensity after controlling for relevant clinical and demographic variables? METHODS In a cross-sectional study, we recruited patients presenting for a scheduled appointment with an orthopaedic surgeon at a hand and upper-extremity clinic of a major urban academic medical center. Of 125 approached patients, 119 (44% men; mean age, 50 ± 17 years) met screening criteria and agreed to participate. Patients completed a clinical and demographic questionnaire, the Numerical Rating Scale to assess pain intensity, the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity Physical Function computerized adaptive test to assess physical limitations, and six measures assessing positive-psychology constructs: The Satisfaction with Life Scale, the Gratitude Questionnaire, the Coping Humor Scale, the Brief Resilience Scale, the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised, and the Life Orientation Test-Revised. We first examined bivariate associations among physical limitations, pain intensity, and all positive-psychology factors as well as demographic and clinical variables. All variables that demonstrated associations with physical limitations or pain intensity at p < 0.05 were included in two-stage multivariable hierarchical regression models. RESULTS After controlling for the potentially confounding effects of prior surgical treatment and duration since pain onset (step1; R total = 0.306; F[7,103] = 6.50), the positive-psychology variables together explained an additional 15% (R change = 0.145, F change [5, 103] = 4.297, p = 0.001) of the variance in physical limitations. Among the positive-psychology variables tested, mindfulness was the only one associated with fewer physical limitations (β = 0.228, t = 2.293, p = 0.024, 4% variance explained). No confounding demographic or clinical variables were found for pain intensity in bivariate analyses. All positive-psychology variables together explained 23% of the variance in pain intensity (R = 0.23; F[5,106] = 6.38, p < 0.001). Among the positive-psychology variables, satisfaction with life was the sole factor independently associated with higher intensity (β = -0.237, t = -2.16, p = 0.033, 3% variance explained). CONCLUSIONS Positive-psychology variables explained 15% of the variance in physical limitations and for 23% of the variance in pain intensity among patients with heterogenous upper extremity disorders within a hand and upper extremity practice. Of all positive-psychology factors, mindfulness and satisfaction with life were most important for physical limitations and pain intensity, respectively. As positive-psychology factors are more easily modifiable through skills-based interventions than pain and physical limitations, results suggest implementation of such interventions to potentially improve outcomes in this population. Skills-based interventions targeting mindfulness and satisfaction with life may be of particular benefit. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II, prognostic study.
Collapse
|
29
|
Andrawis JP. CORR Insights®: What Factors Are Associated With Disability After Upper Extremity Injuries? A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476:2216-2218. [PMID: 30247230 PMCID: PMC6259982 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000000498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
30
|
Glucocorticoid injections for greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled (GLUTEAL) trial. Clin Rheumatol 2018; 38:647-655. [PMID: 30267357 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-018-4309-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Revised: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Small observational studies suggest that local glucocorticoid (GC) injection may be effective in the management of the greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS). The objective was to perform the first randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of local GC injection in the management of GTPS. The trial was conducted between November 2011 and May 2015. Inclusion criteria included lateral hip pain (LHP) for greater than 1 month, a LHP score of ≥ 4/10 and typical LHP reproduced by palpation of the greater trochanter. Participants were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to injection with a combination of local anaesthetic and GC (intervention) or injection with normal saline solution (placebo). The primary outcome of interest was the difference in pain intensity at 4 weeks post-injection between the two groups. Patients were followed for 6 months. A total of 46 patients were included. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of pain reduction at 1 month (p = 0.23). When including all measures in the first 4 weeks and using multilevel regression, there was a trend towards improvement in pain scores in favour of the intervention group (p = 0.08). There were no significant differences in pain scores between groups at 3 and 6 months. In the management of GTPS, local glucocorticoid injections are of no greater efficacy than injection of normal saline solution. Given the lack of long-term improvement and the potential for cortisone-related side effects, this intervention is of limited benefit.
Collapse
|
31
|
Zale EL, Heinhuis TJ, Tehan T, Salgueiro D, Rosand J, Vranceanu AM. Resiliency is independently associated with greater quality of life among informal caregivers to neuroscience intensive care unit patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2018; 52:27-33. [PMID: 29549820 DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2017] [Revised: 02/22/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Every year, millions of Americans become informal caregivers to loved ones admitted to Neuroscience Intensive Care Units (Neuro-ICU), and face challenges to Quality of Life (QoL). This study sought to identify associations between resiliency, distress, and caregiver QoL at time of Neuro-ICU admission. METHODS Informal caregivers (N = 79, Mage = 53, 64% female) of Neuro-ICU patients were recruited and completed self-report questionnaires during the hospitalization. We used hierarchical regression to test relative contributions of caregiver mindfulness, perceived coping abilities, and preparedness for caregiving to caregiver QoL, above-and-beyond non-modifiable patient and caregiver factors (e.g., gender) and caregiver psychological distress (i.e., anxiety, depression, history of mental health conditions). RESULTS Preparedness for caregiving was uniquely and positively associated with Physical Health QoL (sr2 = 0.07, p = 0.001), Social QoL (sr2 = 0.05, p = 0.021), and Environmental QoL (sr2 = 0.14, p < 0.001), even after accounting for psychological distress. Mindfulness was uniquely and positively associated with Physical Health QoL (sr2 = 0.12, p < 0.001) and Psychological QoL (sr2 = 0.07, p = 0.004), above-and-beyond variance accounted for by psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS Mindfulness and preparedness for caregiving emerged as consistent, unique resiliency factors associated with greater caregiver QoL across QoL dimensions. Results highlight the importance of resiliency factors in QoL among Neuro-ICU caregivers and the need for early interventions to support resiliency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily L Zale
- Department of Psychiatry, Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tessa J Heinhuis
- Psychology Department, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Tara Tehan
- Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit, Institute for Brain Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Danielle Salgueiro
- Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit, Institute for Brain Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan Rosand
- Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit, Institute for Brain Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ana-Maria Vranceanu
- Department of Psychiatry, Integrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|