The genetic landscape of gastrointestinal stromal tumor lacking KIT and PDGFRA mutations

Sarco/endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase 3 (SERCA3) expression in gastrointestinal stromal tumours

Accurate characterisation of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) is important for prognosis and the choice of targeted therapies. Histologically the diagnosis relies on positive immunostaining of tumours for KIT (CD117) and DOG1. Here we report that GISTs also abundantly express the type 3 Sarco/Endoplasmic Reticulum Calcium ATPase (SERCA3). SERCA enzymes transport calcium ions from the cytosol into the endoplasmic reticulum and play an important role in regulating the intensity and the periodicity of calcium-induced cell activation. GISTs from various localisations, histological and molecular subtypes or risk categories were intensely immunopositive for SERCA3 with the exception of PDGFRA-mutated cases where expression was high or moderate. Strong SERCA3 expression was observed also in normal and hyperplastic interstitial cells of Cajal. Decreased SERCA3 expression in GIST was exceptionally observed in a zonal pattern, where CD117 staining was similarly decreased, reflecting clonal heterogeneity. In contrast to GIST, SERCA3 immunostaining of spindle cell tumours and other gastrointestinal tumours resembling GIST was negative or weak. In conclusion, SERCA3 immunohistochemistry may be useful for the diagnosis of GIST with high confidence, when used as a third marker in parallel with KIT and DOG1. Moreover, SERCA3 immunopositivity may be particularly helpful in cases with negative or weak KIT or DOG1 staining, a situation that may be encountered de novo, or during the spontaneous or therapy-induced clonal evolution of GIST.

Molecular Mechanisms of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and Their Impact on Systemic Therapy Decision

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are soft tissue sarcomas that mostly derive from Cajal cell precursors. They are by far the most common soft tissue sarcomas. Clinically, they present as gastrointestinal malignancies, most often with bleeding, pain, or intestinal obstruction. They are identified using characteristic immunohistochemical staining for CD117 and DOG1. Improved understanding of the molecular biology of these tumors and identification of oncogenic drivers have altered the systemic treatment of primarily disseminated disease, which is becoming increasingly complex. Gain-of-function mutations in KIT or PDGFRA genes represent the driving mutations in more than 90% of all GISTs. These patients exhibit good responses to targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Gastrointestinal stromal tumors lacking the KIT/PDGFRA mutations, however, represent distinct clinico-pathological entities with diverse molecular mechanisms of oncogenesis. In these patients, therapy with TKIs is hardly ever as effective as for KIT/PDGFRA-mutated GISTs. This review provides an outline of current diagnostics aimed at identifying clinically relevant driver alterations and a comprehensive summary of current treatments with targeted therapies for patients with GISTs in both adjuvant and metastatic settings. The role of molecular testing and the selection of the optimal targeted therapy according to the identified oncogenic driver are reviewed and some future directions are proposed.

A novel fusion between CDC42BPB and ALK in a patient with quadruple wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common type of mesenchymal tumor in gastrointestinal tract, with striking features of morphology and immunohistochemistry. But GISTs in pregnancy could seldom be found. Pathogenic activating mutations of the proto‐oncogene KIT and PDGFRA are detected in majority GISTs, and adjuvant imatinib therapy targeting KIT and PDGFRA mutations is recommended for patients with high‐risk GIST. However, some rare subgroups with distinct molecular features remain uncovered and more therapeutic targets need to be revealed.

Methods

The DNA/RNA samples were detected using the NGS‐based YuanSu450 gene panel. After identifying the CDC42BPB‐ALK fusion by NGS, this novel fusion was further confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Subsequently, FISH analysis was performed using the Vysis ALK Break Apart FISH Probe kit to testify the ALK status. ALK protein expression was confirmed by IHC (D5F3 and 5A4).

Results

Herein, we reported the first case of quadruple wild‐type (WT) GIST with ALK‐CDC42BPB fusion and ALK (D5F3) overexpression. In this study, we described a 33‐year‐old pregnant patient in lactation who had a massive space occupying lesion (with the maximum diameter of 22 cm) in the stomach and was eventually diagnosed as quadruple WT GIST (KIT^WT/PDGFRA^WT/SDH^WT/RAS‐P^WT).

Conclusion

We unexpectedly found that this GIST patient showed ALK (D5F3) overexpression and harbored a novel fusion CDC42BPB exon 24‐ALK in exon 20.

Risk-Related Genes and Associated Signaling Pathways of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Purpose

Knowledge on the potential association between differential gene expression and risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is currently limited. We used bioinformatics tools to identify differentially expressed genes in GIST samples and the related signaling pathways of these genes.

Patients and Methods

The GSE136755 dataset was obtained from the GEO database and differentially expressed genes (CENPA, CDK1, TPX2, CCNB1, CCNA2, BUB1, AURKA, KIF11, NDC80) were screened using String and Cytoscape bioinformatics tools. Then, three groups of eight patients at high, intermediate and low risk of GIST were selected from patients diagnosed with GIST by immunohistochemistry in our hospital from October 2020 to March 2021. Differential expression of CDK1 and BUB1 was verified by comparing the amount of expressed p21-Activated kinase 4 (PAK4) protein in pathological sections.

Results

SPSS26.0 analysis showed that the expression level of PAK4 in GISTs was significantly higher than in normal tissues and paratumoral tissues and there was significant difference among the three groups of patients (P < 0.01). PAK4 levels in paratumoral and normal tissues were negligible with no significant difference between the tissues.

Conclusion

CENPA, CDK1, TPX2, CCNB1, CCNA2, BUB1, AURKA, KIF11 and NDC80 gene expression can be used as biomarkers to assess the risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumors whereby expression increases gradually with the increased risk of GIST formation. The genes encode proteins that regulate the division, proliferation and apoptosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors mainly through PI3K/AKT, MARK, P53, WNT and other signaling pathways.

Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

1: ESGE recommends endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) as the best tool to characterize subepithelial lesion (SEL) features (size, location, originating layer, echogenicity, shape), but EUS alone is not able to distinguish among all types of SEL.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 2: ESGE suggests providing tissue diagnosis for all SELs with features suggestive of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) if they are of size > 20 mm, or have high risk stigmata, or require surgical resection or oncological treatment.Weak recommendation, very low quality evidence. 3: ESGE recommends EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) or mucosal incision-assisted biopsy (MIAB) equally for tissue diagnosis of SELs ≥ 20 mm in size.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4: ESGE recommends against surveillance of asymptomatic gastrointestinal (GI) tract leiomyomas, lipomas, heterotopic pancreas, granular cell tumors, schwannomas, and glomus tumors, if the diagnosis is clear.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 5: ESGE suggests surveillance of asymptomatic esophageal and gastric SELs without definite diagnosis, with esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at 3-6 months, and then at 2-3-year intervals for lesions < 10 mm in size, and at 1-2-year intervals for lesions 10-20 mm in size. For asymptomatic SELs > 20 mm in size that are not resected, ESGE suggests surveillance with EGD plus EUS at 6 months and then at 6-12-month intervals.Weak recommendation, very low quality evidence. 6: ESGE recommends endoscopic resection for type 1 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (g-NENs) if they grow larger than 10 mm. The choice of resection technique should depend on size, depth of invasion, and location in the stomach.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 7: ESGE suggests considering removal of histologically proven gastric GISTs smaller than 20 mm as an alternative to surveillance. The decision to resect should be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting. The choice of technique should depend on size, location, and local expertise.Weak recommendation, very low quality evidence. 8: ESGE suggests that, to avoid unnecessary follow-up, endoscopic resection is an option for gastric SELs smaller than 20 mm and of unknown histology after failure of attempts to obtain diagnosis.Weak recommendation, very low quality evidence. 9: ESGE recommends basing the surveillance strategy on the type and completeness of resection. After curative resection of benign SELs no follow-up is advised, except for type 1 gastric NEN for which surveillance at 1-2 years is advised.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 10: For lower or upper GI NEN with a positive or indeterminate margin at resection, ESGE recommends repeating endoscopy at 3-6 months and another attempt at endoscopic resection in the case of residual disease.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) have an incidence of ~1.2 per 10⁵ individuals per year in most countries. Around 80% of GIST have varying molecular changes, predominantly mutually exclusive activating KIT or PDGFRA mutations, but other, rare subtypes also exist. Localized GIST are curable, and surgery is their standard treatment. Risk factors for relapse are tumour size, mitotic index, non-gastric site and tumour rupture. Patients with GIST with KIT or PDGFRA mutations sensitive to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib that are at high risk of relapse have improved survival with adjuvant imatinib treatment. In advanced disease, median overall survival has improved from 18 months to >70 months since the introduction of TKIs. The role of surgery in the advanced setting remains unclear. Resistance to TKIs arise mainly from subclonal selection of cells with resistance mutations in KIT or PDGFRA when they are the primary drivers. Advanced resistant GIST respond to second-line sunitinib and third-line regorafenib, as well as to the new broad-spectrum TKI ripretinib. Rare molecular forms of GIST with alterations involving NF1, SDH genes, BRAF or NTRK genes generally show primary resistance to standard TKIs, but some respond to specific inhibitors of the activated genes. Despite major advances, many questions in both advanced and localized disease remain unanswered.

A review of the tumour spectrum of germline succinate dehydrogenase gene mutations: Beyond phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma

The citric acid cycle, also known as the Krebs cycle, plays an integral role in cellular metabolism and aerobic respiration. Mutations in genes encoding the citric acid cycle enzymes succinate dehydrogenase, fumarate hydratase and malate dehydrogenase all predispose to hereditary tumour syndromes. The succinate dehydrogenase enzyme complex (SDH) couples the oxidation of succinate to fumarate in the citric acid cycle and the reduction of ubiquinone to ubiquinol in the electron transport chain. A loss of function in the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) enzyme complex is most commonly caused by an inherited mutation in one of the four SDHx genes (SDHA, SDHB, SDHC and SDHD). This mechanism was first implicated in familial phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma. However, over the past two decades the spectrum of tumours associated with SDH deficiency has been extended to include gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and pituitary adenomas. The aim of this review is to describe the extended tumour spectrum associated with SDHx gene mutations and to consider how functional tests may help to establish the role of SDHx mutations in new or unexpected tumour phenotypes.

Abnormal MGMT Promoter Methylation in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Genetic Susceptibility and Association with Clinical Outcome

Purpose

KIT/PDGFRA wild-type (WT) gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) represent a heterogeneous subgroup of GISTs that lack KIT or PDGFRA mutations and possess distinct genetic alterations and primary resistance to imatinib. Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient GISTs comprise the largest subpopulation of WT GISTs that are characterized by loss-of-function of SDH. O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is a specific DNA repair enzyme that has been identified as a predictor of positive treatment response to alkylating agents in a variety of cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of MGMT and the prevalence of MGMT promoter methylation in GISTs and to determine the association between MGMT promoter methylation and clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes.

Patients and Methods

A heterogeneous cohort of 137 primary GISTs that confirmed by immunohistochemistry and KIT/PDGFRA mutation analysis were retrospectively selected and analyzed for MGMT expression and MGMT promoter methylation using immunohistochemical staining and methylation-specific PCR (MSP). A concordance analysis between MGMT promoter methylation and clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis was also performed.

Results

A total of 44.5% (65/137) of GIST patients displayed loss of MGMT protein expression, and 10.9% (15/137) of these patients exhibited MGMT promoter methylation. However, no significant correlation was observed between the loss of MGMT protein expression and MGMT promoter methylation. WT GISTs possessing an epithelioid or mixed phenotype, particularly those that were SDH-deficient, displayed a markedly higher prevalence of MGMT promoter methylation compared to that in KIT/PDGFRA mutated GISTs. Moreover, MGMT promoter methylation was identified as a potential independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS in patients with GIST.

Conclusion

MGMT promoter methylation is particularly frequent in SDH-deficient GISTs and in WT GISTs possessing an epithelioid/mixed phenotype, and knowledge of this methylation status may offer a novel potential therapeutic option for WT GISTs.

Altered chromosomal topology drives oncogenic programs in SDH-deficient GISTs

Epigenetic aberrations are widespread in cancer, yet the underlying mechanisms and causality remain poorly understood^1-3. A subset of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) lack canonical kinase mutations but instead have succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficiency and global DNA hyper-methylation^4,5. Here we associate this hyper-methylation with changes in genome topology that activate oncogenic programs. To investigate epigenetic alterations systematically, we mapped DNA methylation, CTCF insulators, enhancers, and chromosome topology in KIT-mutant, PDGFRA-mutant, and SDH-deficient GISTs. Although these respective subtypes shared similar enhancer landscapes, we identified hundreds of putative insulators where DNA methylation replaced CTCF binding in SDH-deficient GISTs. We focused on a disrupted insulator that normally partitions a core GIST super-enhancer from the FGF4 oncogene. Recurrent loss of this insulator alters locus topology in SDH-deficient GISTs, allowing aberrant physical interaction between enhancer and oncogene. CRISPR-mediated excision of the corresponding CTCF motifs in an SDH-intact GIST model disrupted the boundary and strongly up-regulated FGF4 expression. We also identified a second recurrent insulator loss event near the KIT oncogene, which is also highly expressed across SDH-deficient GISTs. Finally, we established a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) from an SDH-deficient GIST that faithfully maintains the epigenetics of the parental tumor, including hyper-methylation and insulator defects. This PDX model is highly sensitive to FGF receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, and more so to combined FGFR and KIT inhibition, validating the functional significance of the underlying epigenetic lesions. Our study reveals how epigenetic alterations can drive oncogenic programs in the absence of canonical kinase mutations, with implications for mechanistic targeting of aberrant pathways in cancers.

Paragangliomas in Carney-Stratakis Syndrome

Carney-Stratakis Syndrome (CSS) comprises of paragangliomas (PGLs) and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Several of its features overlap with Carney Triad (CT) - PGLs, GISTs, and pulmonary chondromas. CSS has autosomal dominant inheritance, incomplete penetrance, and greater relative frequency of PGL over GISTs. The PGLs in CSS are multicentric and GISTs are multifocal in all the patients, suggesting an inherited susceptibility and associating the two manifestations. In this review, we highlight the clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics of CSS, along with its diagnostic and therapeutic implications.

KIT mutation in a naïve succinate dehydrogenase-deficient gastric GIST

Up to 85% of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) harbor mutually exclusive mutations in the KIT or the PDGFRA gene. Among others, known as wild type GIST, succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)‐deficient tumors develop due to genetic or epigenetic alterations in any of four SDH genes. Herein, we present a unique case of SDH‐deficient GIST with an unusual heterogeneous SDHA and SDHB staining pattern and mutations detected in the SDHA and KIT gene. A 50‐year‐old patient presented with a 5 cm large gastric tumor with a multinodular/plexiform growth pattern, mixed epithelioid and spindle cell morphology, and focal pronounced nuclear atypia with hyperchromasia and high mitotic activity. Immunohistochemically, CD117 and DOG‐1 were positive. SDHB and SDHA stains showed loss of expression in some of the nodules, whereas others presented with an unusually weak patchy positivity. Molecular analysis revealed a point mutation in exon 5 of the SDHA gene and a mutation in exon 11 of the KIT gene. We hypothesize that based on the allele frequency of SDHA and KIT mutations the tumor is best regarded as SDH‐deficient GIST in which the SDHA mutation represents the most likely driver mutation. The identified KIT mutation raises the distinct possibility that the KIT mutation is a secondary event reflecting clonal evolution. This is the first case of a treatment naïve GIST harboring a somatic SDHA and a KIT mutation, challenging the dogma that oncogenic mutations in treatment naïve GIST are mutually exclusive.

Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) deficiency, Carney triad and the epigenome

In this report, we review the relationship between succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) deficiency and the epigenome, especially with regards to two clinical conditions. Carney triad (CT) is a very rare disease with synchronous or metachronous occurrence of at least three different tumor entities; gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), paraganglioma (PGL), and pulmonary chondroma. This condition affects mostly females and it is never inherited. Another disease that shares two of the tumor components of CT, namely GIST and PGL is the Carney-Stratakis syndrome (CSS) or dyad. CSS affects both genders during childhood and adolescence. We review herein the main clinical features and molecular mechanisms behind those two syndromes that share quite a bit of similarities, but one is non-hereditary (CT) whereas the other shows an autosomal-dominant, with incomplete penetrance, inheritance pattern (CSS). Both CT and CSS are caused by the deficiency of the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) enzyme. The key difference between the two syndromes is the molecular mechanism that causes the SDH deficiency. Most cases of CT show down-regulation of SDH through site-specific hyper-methylation of the SDHC gene, whereas CSS cases carry inactivating germline mutations within one of the genes coding for the SDH subunits A, B, C, or D (SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD). There is only partial overlap between the two conditions (there are a few patients with CT that have SDH subunit mutations) but both lead to increased methylation of the entire genome in the tumors associated with them. Other tumors (outside CT and CSS) that have SDH deficiency are associated with increased methylation of the entire genome, but only in CT there is site-specific methylation of the SDHC gene. These findings have implications for diagnostics and the treatment of patients with these, often metastatic tumors.

Advances and Challenges on Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) originate from interstitial cells of Cajal and account for over 5,000 newly diagnosed cases in the United States. The discovery of activated KIT and PDGFRA mutations and introduction of imatinib revolutionized the treatment strategy and opened up the new era of target therapy for solid tumors. Although surgery remains the primary modality of treatment for curative purpose, almost half of the patients experienced disease recurrence. Tailoring (neo)-adjuvant treatment with imatinib is ongoing to meet the need for an effective therapy. Currently, two drugs (sunitinib and regorafenib) have obtained Food and Drug Administration approval for GISTs after imatinib failure. However, most of the patients eventually progress due to primary or secondary resistance. Deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms will guide us to develop personalized strategies in the future. Discussion in this review includes current standard management and the most recent advances and multiple ongoing clinical trials with different approaches. This review will provide further steps to be taken to conquer refractory disease.

Targeted ultra-deep sequencing unveils a lack of driver-gene mutations linking non-hereditary gastrointestinal stromal tumors and highly prevalent second primary malignancies: random or nonrandom, that is the question

The association of non-hereditary (sporadic) gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and second primary malignancies is known to be nonrandom, although the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unknown. In this study, 136 of 749 (18.1%) patients with sporadic GISTs were found to have additional associated cancers, with gastrointestinal and genitourinary/gynecologic/breast cancers being the most prevalent. Gene mutations in GISTs and their associated colorectal cancers (CRCs) (n=9) were analyzed using a panel of 409 cancer-related genes, while a separate group of 40 sporadic CRCs not associated with GISTs served as controls. All 9 of the GISTs had either KIT (8 of 9) or PDGFRA (1 of 9) mutations that were not present in their associated CRCs. Conversely, all but one of the 9 GIST-associated CRCs exhibited an APC mutation, a TP53 mutation or both, while none of their corresponding GISTs harbored either APC or TP53 mutations. The genetic profile of CRCs with and without associated GISTs did not differ. Although population-based studies and case series worldwide, including ours, have unanimously indicated that the GIST-CRC association is nonrandom, our targeted ultra-deep sequencing unveiled a lack of driver-gene mutations linking sporadic GISTs to highly prevalent second primaries. Further studies are needed to elucidate other genetic alterations that may be responsible for this puzzling contradiction.

Classification of gastrointestinal stromal tumor syndromes

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, thought to derive from neoplastic outgrowth of the interstitial cells of Cajal. Building on recent advances in recognition, classification and diagnosis, the past two decades have seen a changing paradigm with molecular diagnostics and targeted therapies. KIT and PDGFRA mutations account for 85-90% of GIST carcinogenesis. However, the remaining 10-15% of GISTs, which until recently were called KIT/PDGFRA wild-type GISTs, have been found to have one of the several mutations, including in the SDHA, B, C, D, BRAF and NF1 genes. Though most of such GISTs are sporadic, a number of families with high incidence rates of GISTs and other associated clinical manifestations have been reported and found to harbor germline mutations in KIT, PDGFRA, SDH subunits and NF1 The goal of this review is to describe the mutations, clinical manifestations and therapeutic implications of syndromic and inherited GISTs in light of recent studies of their clinicopathologic range and pathogenesis.

DIAGNOSIS of ENDOCRINE DISEASE: SDHx mutations: beyond pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas

Mutations in one of the five genes encoding the succinate dehydrogenase (SDHx) or mitochondrial complex II cause the corresponding family syndromes characterized by the occurrence of pheochromocytomas (PHEO) and paragangliomas (PGL). Recently, other solid growths, such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and pituitary adenomas (PAs) have been associated with these syndromes. In the absence of prospective studies assessing their frequency, at present, their occurrence seems too infrequent to suggest systematic screening for SDHx mutation carriers. However, SDHB immunohistochemistry (IHC) on tumor tissues or SDHx genetic testing on blood or tumor samples should be performed in patients affected by GISTs, RCCs or PAs with clinicopathologic phenotypes suggesting an etiologic role of SDHx genes.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: The GIST of Precision Medicine

The discovery of activated KIT mutations in gastrointestinal (GI) stromal tumors (GISTs) in 1998 triggered a sea change in our understanding of these tumors and has ushered in a new paradigm for the use of molecular genetic diagnostics to guide targeted therapies. KIT and PDGFRA mutations account for 85-90% of GISTs; subsequent genetic studies have led to the identification of mutation/epimutation of additional genes, including the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) subunit A, B, C, and D genes. This review focuses on integrating findings from clinicopathologic, genetic, and epigenetic studies, which classify GISTs into two distinct clusters: an SDH-competent group and an SDH-deficient group. This development is important since it revolutionizes our current management of affected patients and their relatives, fundamentally, based on the GIST genotype.

Loss of succinate dehydrogenase subunit B (SDHB) as a prognostic factor in advanced ileal well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors

PURPOSE

Abnormal expression of succinate dehydrogenase, (SDH), in particular of the B subunit (SDHB), is implicated in the pathogenesis of neuroendocrine tumors. This study evaluates the distribution of SDHB in WHO grading G1 and G2 intestinal, well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and corresponding lymph node or liver metastases.

METHODS

We collected ileal well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors specimens from consecutive patients with prior primary resection and distant synchronous or metachronous liver metastases. We obtained 195 specimens from primary tumors (n = 106) and metastases (n = 89). The expression (E) of SDHB and the immunostaining intensity (I) were evaluated semiquantitatively and combined into a single score. SDHB score was evaluated in primitive tumor and metastatic specimens.

RESULTS

SDHB was found in all tumor cells. Mean SDHB expression was 72.7 % ± 17.1 % in primitive specimens and 27.9 % ± 24.6 % in metastatic specimens (p < 0.0001). SDH intensity was higher in primitive specimens (p < 0.0001). SDHB score was 9-12 in 96 specimens of the primitive group and 2 metastatic specimens (p < 0.0001). None of the analyzed parameters was predictive of overall survival in the primitive subset. In the metastatic subset, loss of SDHB expression, intensity, and score were prognostic factors for survival. Lower expression and intensity of SDHB in metastatic lesions were associated with longer overall survival. When combining SDHB score and Ki-67 % in the metastatic subset, a lower SDHB score was associated with prolonged overall survival, independently from Ki-67 %.

CONCLUSIONS

SDHB score was different in primitive and metastatic specimens. The combination of SDHB score and Ki-67 % was a stronger predictor of overall survival than Ki-67 % alone. This stratification might help predict survival.

Clinicopathologic study of succinate-dehydrogenase-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A single-institutional experience in China

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) that are not driven by kinase mutations, as are most GISTs, often show loss of function of the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) complex and are considered SDH-deficient GISTs. SDH-deficient GISTs share many distinct characteristics compared with conventional GISTs. However, data regarding these characteristics, particularly among Asian people, are relatively limited. The objective of this study was to characterize the clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of these uncommon GISTs.This retrospective observational study enrolled 12 patients with SDH-deficient GISTs, who were selected from 335 patients with GIST diagnosed at our institution between October 31, 2013 and October 31, 2016 by succinate dehydrogenase subunit B staining.There were 8 male and 4 female patients, with a median age of 57 years (range, 21-73 years). Ten patients (83.3%) were diagnosed at or after the age of 40 years and represented 7.2% (10/138) of the entire population of elderly patients with gastric GISTs. The tumor size ranged from 3 to 19 cm (median, 7 cm); the primary tumor was multifocal in 6 cases (50%), and tumors had a multinodular or plexiform architecture in 10 cases (83.3%). Ten cases (83.3%) showed pure epithelioid morphology, with the remaining 2 cases (16.7%) showing mixed histologic subtype. Lymph node metastasis was found at the time of primary resection in 50% (3/6) of patients. Four cases (33.3%) had distant metastasis at presentation. Four patients (33.3%) developed disease progression during imatinib treatment after initial resection, but all of these patients regained disease control when the treatment was altered to sunitinib targeted therapy.SDH-deficient GISTs arise exclusively in the stomach and account for approximately 7.4% (12/162) of gastric GISTs. Moreover, those affecting people older than 40 years are not uncommon and sunitinib may work well for cases showing treatment failure with imatinib.

Molecular cytology genotyping of primary and metastatic GI stromal tumors by using a custom two-gene targeted next-generation sequencing panel with therapeutic intent

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In an era of precision medicine, customized genotyping of GI stromal tumors by screening for driver mutations will become the standard of care. The fidelity of genotype concordance between paired cytology smears and surgical pathology specimens is unknown. In patients with either primary or metastatic sporadic disease, we sought to determine the frequency of KIT and PDGFRA pathogenic alterations within such specimens, imatinib sensitivity, and the concordance of pathogenic alterations between paired specimens.

METHODS

DNA obtained from cytology smears from 36 patients, 24 of whom had paired surgical pathology specimens, underwent targeted next-generation sequencing by using a custom panel to evaluate somatic mutations within KIT (exon 2, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18) and PDGFRA (exon 12, 14, 15, 18) genes. Patients with KIT and PDGRFA wild-type genes completed the Qiagen Human Comprehensive Cancer GeneRead DNAseq Targeted Array V2.

RESULTS

Genotyping revealed KIT and PDGFRA mutations in 68% and 15% of patients. The wild-type population did not harbor mutations in BRAF, RAS family, SDHB, SETD2, or NF1. Imatinib sensitivity based on the oncogenic kinase mutation prevalence was estimated to be 68%. Mutational concordance between paired cytology and surgical pathology specimens was 96%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data have demonstrated the ability to stratify either primary or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors by mutational subtype using a targeted next-generation sequencing 2 gene mutation panel. We highlight the ability to use cytology specimens obtained via minimally invasive techniques as a surrogate to surgical specimens given the high mutational landscape concordance between paired specimens.

Pediatric/"Wildtype" gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Pediatric/"Wildtype" gastrointestinal stromal tumor (P/WT-GIST) is a rare cancer, distinct and markedly different from the phenotype found predominantly in older patients (adult, non-wildtype GIST). Having a different molecular signature, it is not responsive to standard adjuvant therapies utilized in adult GIST, and surgery remains the only effective cure. However, even with presumed complete resections in patients with localized disease at presentation, recurrence rates are high. Furthermore, it is an indolent cancer that can persist for decades, and treatment strategies must balance the possible morbid risks of intervention with the reality of preserving quality of life in the interim. Effective adjuvant therapies remain elusive, and research is critically needed to identify both targets and drugs for treatment consideration.

"Wild type" GIST: Clinicopathological features and clinical practice

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal tract. Mutation of KIT and PDGFRA genes is implicated in the tumorigenesis. Approximately 10% of GISTs do not harbor mutation of these genes, and they are designated as "wild type" GIST. They are classified into succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient and non-SDH-deficient groups. SDH-deficient group includes Carney triad and Carney Stratakis syndrome. The patients are young women. Tumors occur in the antrum of the stomach, and tumor cells are epithelioid. Lymph node metastasis is frequent. The non-SDH-deficient group includes neurofibromatosis (NF) type 1 and GISTs with mutations of BRAF, KRAS, and PIK3CA and with the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene. GIST in NF occurs in the small intestine, and tumor cells are spindle shaped. GIST with BRAF mutation arises in the small intestine. Attention to the age, gender, family history and other neoplasms may raise the prediction of syndromic disease. Location of the tumor, morphology, and pleomorphism of the tumor cells are further informative. Lymphovascular invasion should be carefully evaluated. The determination of KIT expression is essential for the diagnosis. When wild type GIST is suspected, intensive genetic analysis is required. Further, a careful and long-time observation is recommended.

Carney triad can be (rarely) associated with germline succinate dehydrogenase defects

Carney triad, the association of paragangliomas/pheochromocytomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumors and pulmonary chondromas, is a sporadic condition that is significantly more frequent in females; its genetic etiology remains unknown. Carney triad is distinct from the dyad of paragangliomas/pheochromocytomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors, known as Carney-Stratakis syndrome, which is inherited in an autosomal- dominant manner and is almost always caused by succinate dehydrogenase subunit mutations. In the present study, we investigated the largest cohort of Carney triad patients that is available internationally: 63 unrelated patients. Six patients (9.5%) were found to have germline variants in the SDHA, SDHB or SDHC genes. All six patients, except one, had multifocal gastrointestinal stromal tumors, chondromas and/or paragangliomas. A patient with Carney triad and SDHC variant had a ganglioneuroma. One of the patients with Carney triad and SDHB mutation had a nephew with the same sequence defect, who developed a neuroblastoma. Other relatives, carriers of the identified SDHA, SDHB or SDHC mutations, have not developed any of the components of Carney triad or Carney-Stratakis syndrome. None of the other 57 Carney triad patients had any genomic defects of SDHA, SDHB or SDHC genes. We conclude that, in rare occasions, Carney triad can be allelic to Carney-Stratakis syndrome. Although for the vast majority of patients with Carney triad the causative defect(s) remain(s) unknown, testing for SDHA, SDHB or SDHC variations should be offered, as carriers may develop isolated paragangliomas/pheochromocytomas and occasionally other tumors.

Genetics of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Heterogeneous Family of Tumors?

Approximately 85-90% of adult gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) harbor KIT and PDGFRA mutations. The remaining cases, including the majority of pediatric GISTs, lack these mutations, and have been designated as KIT/PDGFRA wild-type (WT) GISTs. Nearly 15% of WT GISTs harbor BRAF mutations, while others arise in patients with type I neurofibromatosis. Recent work has confirmed that 20-40% of KIT/PDGFRA WT GISTs show loss of function of succinate dehydrogenase complex. Less than 5% of GISTs lack known molecular alterations ("quadruple-negative" GISTs). Thus, it is important to consider genotyping these tumors to help better define their clinical behavior and therapy.

Beyond standard therapy: drugs under investigation for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common nonepithelial malignancy of the GI tract. With the discovery of KIT and later platelet-derived growth factor α (PDGFRA) gain-of-function mutations as factors in the pathogenesis of the disease, GIST was the quintessential model for targeted therapy. Despite the successful clinical use of imatinib mesylate, a selective receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitor that targets KIT, PDGFRA and BCR-ABL, we still do not have treatment for the long-term control of advanced GIST.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the drugs that are under investigation or have been assessed in trials for GIST treatment. The article focuses on their mechanisms of actions, the preclinical evidence of efficacy, and the clinical trials concerning safety and efficacy in humans.

EXPERT OPINION

It is known that KIT and PDGFRA mutations in GIST patients influence the response to treatment. This observation should be taken into consideration when investigating new drugs. RECIST was developed to help uniformly report efficacy trials in oncology. Despite the usefulness of this system, many questions are being addressed about its validity in evaluating the true efficacy of drugs knowing that new targeted therapies do not affect the tumor size as much as they halt progression and prolong survival.