Bisphosphonates in the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: pros

Ideal food pyramid for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A narrative review

Emerging literature suggests that diet plays an important modulatory role in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) because diet is an environmental factor that affects inflammation, antigen presentation, antioxidant defense mechanisms and gut microbiota. Patients with RA frequently ask their doctors about which diets to follow, and even in the absence of advice from their physicians, many patients are undertaking various dietary interventions. Given this background, the aim of this review is to evaluate the evidence to date regarding the ideal dietary approach for management of RA in order to reduce the counteracting inflammation, and to construct a food pyramid for patients with RA. The pyramid shows that carbohydrates should be consumed every day (3 portions of whole grains, preferably gluten free), together with fruits and vegetables (5 portions; among which fruit, berries and citrus fruit are to be preferred, and among the vegetables, green leafy ones.), light yogurt (125 ml), skim milk (200 ml), 1 glass (125 ml) of wine and extra virgin olive oil; weekly, fish (3 portions), white meat (3 portions), legumes (2 portions) eggs (2 portions), seasoned cheeses (2 portions), and red or processed meats (once a week). At the top of the pyramid, there are two pennants: one green means that subjects with RA need some personalized supplementation (vitamin D and omega 3) and one red means that there are some foods that are banned (salt and sugar). The food pyramid allows patients to easily figure out what to eat.

Diabetes Mellitus and Osteoporosis Correlation: Challenges and Hopes

Diabetes and osteoporosis are two common diseases with different complications. Despite different therapeutic strategies, managing these diseases and reducing their burden have not been satisfactory, especially when they appear one after the other. In this review, we aimed to clarify the similarity, common etiology and possible common adjunctive therapies of these two major diseases and designate the known molecular pattern observed in them. Based on different experimental findings, we want to illuminate that interestingly similar pathways lead to diabetes and osteoporosis. Meanwhile, there are a few drugs involved in the treatment of both diseases, which most of the time act in the same line but sometimes with opposing results. Considering the correlation between diabetes and osteoporosis, more efficient management of both diseases, in conditions of concomitant incidence or cause and effect condition, is required.

Non-surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism

The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the options available for patients with primary hyperparathyrodism (PHPT) not undergoing parathyroidectomy (PTx). Adequate hydration should be recommended in all patients. Calcium intake should not be restricted and vitamin D deficiency should be corrected aiming at a serum concentration of 25OHD of >20 ng/mL or even higher (>30 ng/mL according to some opinion leaders). Pharmacologic therapy is not an alternative to PTx and could be considered in patients who meet the surgical criteria but unwilling to undergo PTx, as well as in patients with an increased risk of surgery or failed surgery. Targeted therapy includes antiresorptive drugs for skeletal protection and cinacalcet for lowering serum calcium. Combined therapy can be an option when appropriate. Pregnant women should be treated conservatively (hydration) and surgery, if needed, performed in the second trimester of pregnancy. Severe hypercalcemia is a life-threatening condition and requires immediate intensive treatment.

Efficacy and safety of recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34) are similar to those of alendronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

The study evaluates efficacy and safety of recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1-34) [rhPTH (1-34)] and alendronate (ALN) in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.Totally 65 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were divided into 2 groups. PTH group received daily subcutaneous injection of rhPTH (1-34), and ALN group were treated orally with ALN per week. Bone mineral density (BMD) of lumbar spine (1-4), femoral neck, and total hip, serum levels of calcium, phosphorus, total cholesterol, triglyceride, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP), and C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) were tested before treatment and at week 24 and 48 after treatment. Serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) were measured before treatment and at week 48 after treatment.The rhPTH (1-34) increased BMD of lumbar spine (1-4), but decreased BMD of femoral neck and total hip at week 48 after treatment. By contrast, ALN enhanced BMD of lumbar spine (1-4) and femoral neck, but reduced BMD of total hip at week 48 after treatment. In PTH group, serum levels of PINP, ALP, and β-CTX were significantly elevated above baseline at week 24 and 48 after treatment. Treatment with ALN decreased levels of PINP, ALP, and β-CTX compared with baseline at week 24 and 48 after treatment. rhPTH (1-34) and ALN significantly decreased levels of PDGF-BB, but not levels of VEGF. rhPTH (1-34) increased levels of calcium, phosphorus and triglyceride, but decreased levels of total cholesterol. ALN increased levels of calcium and triglyceride, but reduced levels of phosphorus and total cholesterol. rhPTH (1-34) and ALN were safe in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.The study demonstrates that efficacy of rhPTH (1-34) on BMD of lumbar spine (1-4) is similar to that of alendronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The effect of rhPTH (1-34) on BMD of femoral neck or total hip is weaker than that of ALN. In addition, rhPTH (1-34) increases BMD of lumbar spine (1-4) maybe by raising serum levels of VEGF, but reduces BMD of femoral neck and total hip maybe by decreasing serum levels of PDGF-BB.

Effects of alendronate and alfacalcidol on bone in patients with myasthenia gravis initiating glucocorticoids treatment

OBJECTIVE

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are the first-line treatment for myasthenia gravis (MG) and act as long-term immunosuppressants. However, GCs can induce osteoporosis and bone fractures. In this study, we evaluate the effects of oral alendronate and alfacalcidol, or alfacalcidol alone on the bone of Chinese patients with MG who will initiate treatment with GCs.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 75 patients were included in this 12-month prospective, open-label, single-centre study. Patients with bone mineral density (BMD) T-score less than -1.0 at baseline were treated with 70 mg of alendronate per week. Patients with BMD T-score greater than -1.0 at baseline were included in the alfacalcidol-alone group. Patients in two groups were treated with 0.25 μg of alfacalcidol every other day and 600 mg of calcium daily.

RESULTS

After 12 months of treatment, the mean BMD of lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip increased by 3.4% (P = .002), 1.8% (P = .21) and 2.6% (P = .02), respectively, in alendronate group. In alfacalcidol-alone group, the mean BMD of lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip decreased by 6.1%, 3.2% and 3.3%, respectively (all P < .001 vs baseline).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated for the first time that treatment with alendronate combined with alfacalcidol significantly increased BMD, decreased bone turnover biomarker levels and reduced the occurrence of hypercalciuria in a large cohort of Chinese patients with MG who initiated treatment with glucocorticoids. However, treatment with alfacalcidol alone failed to prevent bone loss in patients with MG receiving glucocorticoid therapy.

Efficacy and safety of bisphosphonates in management of low bone density in inflammatory bowel disease: A meta-analysis

This study aims to determine whether bisphosphonates are safe, as well as effective against bone mineral loss in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A computerized search of electronic databases from 1966 to 2016 was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this review to evaluate the role of bisphosphonates in the management of osteoporosis in IBD patients. A revised 7-point Jadad scale was used to evaluate the quality of each study. Overall, 13 RCTs and 923 patients met the inclusion criteria of this meta-analysis. The result showed that bisphosphonates decreased bone mass density (BMD) loss at the lumbar spine (P = 0.0002), reduced the risk of new fractures (P = 0.01), and retained the similar adverse events (P = 0.86). Bisphosphonates may provide protection and safety against bone mineral loss in IBD patients.

Current Status of Research on Osteoporosis after Solid Organ Transplantation: Pathogenesis and Management

Improved survival following organ transplantation has brought to the forefront some long-term complications, among which osteoporosis and associated fractures are the major ones that adversely affect the quality of life in recipients. The pathogenesis of osteoporosis in transplant recipients is complex and multifactorial which may be related to increased bone resorption, decreased bone formation, or both. Studies have shown that the preexisting underlying metabolic bone disorders and the use of immunosuppressive agents are the major risk factors for osteoporosis and fractures after organ transplantation. And rapid bone loss usually occurs in the first 6–12 months with a significant increase in fracture risk. This paper will provide an updated review on the possible pathogenesis of posttransplant osteoporosis and fractures, the natural history, and the current prevention and treatment strategies concerning different types of organ transplantation.