"The past is a different country, they do things differently there": using the SEER data-base to assess prognosis in neuroendocrine tumours

Epidemiology of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a review and protocol presentation for bridging tumor registry data with the Italian association for neuroendocrine tumors (Itanet) national database

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare tumors with diverse clinical behaviors. Large databases like the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program and national NEN registries have provided significant epidemiological knowledge, but they have limitations given the recent advancements in NEN diagnostics and treatments. For instance, newer imaging techniques and therapies have revolutionized NEN management, rendering older data less representative. Additionally, crucial parameters, like the Ki67 index, are missing from many databases. Acknowledging these gaps, the Italian Association for Neuroendocrine Tumors (Itanet) initiated a national multicenter prospective database in 2019, aiming to gather data on newly-diagnosed gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (GEP) NENs. This observational study, coordinated by Itanet, includes patients from 37 Italian centers. The database, which is rigorously maintained and updated, focuses on diverse parameters including age, diagnostic techniques, tumor stage, treatments, and survival metrics. As of October 2023, data from 1,600 patients have been recorded, with an anticipation of reaching 3600 by the end of 2025. This study aims at understanding the epidemiology, clinical attributes, and treatment strategies for GEP-NENs in Italy, and to introduce the Itanet database project. Once comprehensive follow-up data will be acquired, the goal will be to discern predictors of treatment outcomes and disease prognosis. The Itanet database will offer an unparalleled, updated perspective on GEP-NENs, addressing the limitations of older databases and aiding in optimizing patient care. STUDY REGISTRATION: This protocol was registered in clinicaltriasl.gov (NCT04282083).

Comparing surgical and endoscopic resection approaches for colorectal neuroendocrine tumors within the diameter range of 10-20mm: an inverse probability weighting analysis based on the SEER database

Background

Currently, the primary treatment modalities for colorectal neuroendocrine tumors (CRNET) with a diameter between 10mm and 20mm are surgical resection (SR) and endoscopic resection (ER). However, it remains unclear which surgical approach yields the greatest survival benefit for patients.

Methods

This study included data from patients diagnosed with CRNET with tumor diameters ranging from 10mm to 20mm between the years 2004 and 2019, obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were categorized into ER and SR groups based on the respective surgical approaches. Inverse probability weighting (IPTW) was employed to mitigate selection bias. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were utilized to estimate overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Cox regression analysis (univariate and multivariate) was performed to evaluate potential factors influencing survival.

Results

A total of 292 CRNET patients were included in this study (ER group: 108 individuals, SR group: 184 individuals). Prior to IPTW adjustment, Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis demonstrated that the OS and CSS of the SR group were inferior to those of the ER group. However, after IPTW adjustment, no statistically significant differences in prognosis were observed between the two groups. Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with muscular invasion, positive lymph nodes, or distant metastasis derived greater survival benefits from SR. Significant differences in OS and CSS between the two groups were also observed across different age groups.

Conclusion

For patients with mucosal-limited lesions and without local lymph node or distant metastasis, ER is the preferred surgical approach. However, for patients with muscular invasion or positive lymph nodes/distant metastasis, SR offers a better prognosis. The choice of surgical approach should be based on the specific clinical characteristics of patients within different subgroups.

Early-onset pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A distinct disease with improved survival compared with old individuals

Background

The incidence, clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival of early-onset pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (EOPanNENs) have not been well explored.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with PanNENs were identified from the SEER database between 2000 and 2018. EOPanNENs were defined as diagnosis in patients aged less than 50 years, while the remaining were defined as later-onset pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (LOPanNENs). Incidence, clinical features, management, and prognosis were analyzed in our study. Multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS) in EOPanNENs and LOPanNENs, respectively.

Results

A total of 5172 patients with PanNENs were included: 1267 (24.5%) in the EOPanNENs cohort and 3905 (75.5%) in the LOPanNENs cohort. The age-adjusted incidence rate significantly increased among later-onset cases, while it remained relatively stable in early-onset cases. EOPanNENs were more frequently to be female, unmarried, and with better tumor differentiation compared with LOPanNENs. Of note, early-onset patients presented with a higher rate of lymph node involvement, and they were more likely to receive surgical treatment. For local-regional disease at presentation, surgery alone was the most frequently used regimen over the last two decades. With regard to distant stage, a combination of surgery and chemotherapy was more often utilized. Risk factors for PanNENs survival were more correlated with LOPanNENs compared with EOPanNENs. The OS and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were significantly better in the EOPanNENs group. Further analyses showed that EOPanNENs ≤ 2cm were associated with more favorable survival outcomes than EOPanNENs>2cm.

Conclusion

EOPanNENs are a clinically rare and distinct entity from LOPanNENs. The advantages in survival for the EOPanNENs cohort over time were largely driven by the indolent clinical courses including better tumor differentiation and intensified surgical treatment. Further investigations are warranted to better understand the characteristics of this disease subgroup.

A Real-World Study of the Incidence and Outcomes of Early-Onset Well-differentiated Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and outcomes of adults with early-onset (20 to 34 y) diagnosis of well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms.

METHODS

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 database was accessed, and patients with well-differentiated lung or digestive tract neuroendocrine neoplasms diagnosed 2000 to 2018 were reviewed. Annual percent changes (APCs) were calculated for the 3 disease subsites (foregut, midgut, and hindgut) stratified by age group. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates/log-rank testing were used to examine differences in overall survival between the 3 age groups. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate factors affecting overall and cancer-specific survivals.

RESULTS

Throughout the study period, patients with early-onset disease (20 to 34 y) have experienced the greatest APC (20 to 34 y: 9.7; 35 to 49 y: 5.4; ≥50 y: 4.1). When APCs were stratified by disease subsite, this difference in APCs appears to be driven by midgut tumors (20 to 34 y: 19.2; 35 to 49: 8.4; ≥50 y: 3.8). Using multivariable Cox regression modeling, the following variables were associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (worse overall survival): male sex (hazard ratio [HR] 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-1.31), African American race (HR vs. white race: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.15-1.26), nonhindgut primary (HR foregut vs. hindgut primary: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.91-2.13; HR midgut vs. hindgut primary: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.95-2.24), distant disease (HR vs. regional disease: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.96-2.18), no surgery to the primary (HR: 2.34; 95% CI: 2.24-2.46), and older age (HR: 5.80; 95% CI: 4.87-6.91).

CONCLUSION

Cases of early-onset well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms have disproportionately increased over the past 2 decades (compared with other age groups), and this appears to have been driven mainly by midgut tumors.