Prognosis in very young women with triple-negative breast cancer: retrospective study of 216 cases

Glucocorticoid receptors orchestrate a convergence of host and cellular stress signals in triple negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer that lacks expression of the nuclear steroid receptors that bind estrogens (ER) and progestogens (PRs) and does not exhibit HER2 (Human epidermal growth factor 2) receptor overexpression. Even in the face of initially effective chemotherapies, TNBC patients often relapse. One primary cause for therapy-resistant tumor progression is the activation of cellular stress signaling pathways. The glucocorticoid receptor (GR), a corticosteroid-activated transcription factor most closely related to PR, is a mediator of both endocrine/host stress and local tumor microenvironment (TME)-derived and cellular stress responses. Interestingly, GR expression is associated with a good prognosis in ER+ breast cancer but predicts poor prognosis in TNBC. Classically, GR's transcriptional activity is regulated by circulating glucocorticoids. Additionally, GR is regulated by ligand-independent signaling events. Notably, the stress-activated protein kinase, p38 MAP kinase, phosphorylates GR at serine 134 (Ser134) in response to TME-derived growth factors and cytokines, including HGF and TGFβ1. Phospho-Ser134-GR (p-Ser134-GR) associates with cytoplasmic and nuclear signaling molecules, including 14-3-3ζ, aryl hydrocarbon receptors (AhR), and hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs). Phospho-GR/HIF-containing transcriptional complexes upregulate gene sets whose protein products include the components of inducible oncogenic signaling pathways (PTK6) that further promote cancer cell survival, chemoresistance, altered metabolism, and migratory/invasive behavior in TNBC. Recent studies have implicated liganded p-Ser134-GR (p-GR) in dexamethasone-mediated upregulation of genes related to TNBC cell motility and dysregulated metabolism. Herein, we review the tumor-promoting roles of GR and discuss how both ligand-dependent and ligand-independent/stress signaling-driven inputs to p-GR converge to orchestrate metastatic TNBC progression.

Targeting Interleukin-13 Receptor α2 and EphA2 in Aggressive Breast Cancer Subtypes with Special References to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy

Breast cancer (BCA) remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. This review delves into the therapeutic challenges of BCA, emphasizing the roles of interleukin-13 receptor α2 (IL-13Rα2) and erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular receptor A2 (EphA2) in tumor progression and resistance. Highlighting their overexpression in BCA, particularly in aggressive subtypes, such as Her-2-enriched and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), we discuss the potential of these receptors as targets for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies. We examine the structural and functional roles of IL-13Rα2 and EphA2, their pathological significance in BCA, and the promising therapeutic avenues their targeting presents. With an in-depth analysis of current immunotherapeutic strategies, including the limitations of existing treatments and the potential of dual antigen-targeting CAR T-cell therapies, this review aims to summarize potential future novel, more effective therapeutic interventions for BCA. Through a thorough examination of preclinical and clinical studies, it underlines the urgent need for targeted therapies in combating the high mortality rates associated with Her-2-enriched and TNBC subtypes and discusses the potential role of IL-13Rα2 and EphA2 as promising candidates for the development of CAR T-cell therapies.

Challenges for Triple Negative Breast Cancer Treatment: Defeating Heterogeneity and Cancer Stemness

The Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) subtype is known to have a more aggressive clinical course compared to other breast cancer subtypes. Targeted therapies for this type of breast cancer are limited and patients are mostly treated with conventional chemo- and radio-therapies which are not specific and do not target resistant cells. Therefore, one of the major clinical challenges is to find compounds that target the drug-resistant cell populations which are responsible for reforming secondary tumours. The molecular profiling of the different TNBC subtypes holds a promise for better defining these resistant cells specific to each tumour. To this end, a better understanding of TNBC heterogeneity and cancer stemness is required, and extensive genomic analysis can help to understand the disease complexity and distinguish new molecular drivers that can be targeted in the clinics. The use of persister cancer cell-targeting therapies combined with other therapies may provide a big advance to improve TNBC patients' survival.

TrMab-6 Exerts Antitumor Activity in Mouse Xenograft Models of Breast Cancers

Trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP2) has been reported to be overexpressed in many cancers, and is involved in cancer cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. We previously developed a highly sensitive anti-TROP2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (clone TrMab-6; mouse IgG_2b, kappa) using a Cell-Based Immunization and Screening method. TrMab-6 is useful for investigations using flow cytometry, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry and possesses antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) against TROP2-expressing triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell lines, such as MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468. This study investigated whether TrMab-6 possesses in vivo antitumor activities via ADCC/CDC activities using mouse xenograft models of TNBC cell lines. In vivo experiments on MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 xenografts revealed that TrMab-6 significantly reduced tumor growth compared with normal mouse IgG treatment. The findings of this study suggest that TrMab-6 is a promising treatment option for TROP2-expressing TNBC.

Advancements in the Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Narrative Review of the Literature

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are aggressive tumors that are more common in young women, African American populations, and those with hereditary mutations. These tumors are notable for their high recurrence rate and predilection for chemoresistance. The goal of this narrative review is to describe the current treatment options for patients diagnosed with TNBC and to review the studies that have put forward these recommendations. We searched PubMed and Cochrane databases for free full-text, English-language studies published within the last several years pertaining to the search items “triple negative breast cancer” and “treatment”. We included clinical trials and retrospective reviews that had clear designs and assessed their findings against a gold standard or placebo and included evidence of overall response and/or survival outcomes. 

Patients with early-stage (I-III) TNBC still benefit from treatment with chemotherapeutic regimens involving anthracyclines, taxanes, and antimetabolites. Platinum-based therapies have been shown to improve the overall pathologic complete response (pCR), but there is conflicting evidence with regard to their contribution to disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), even with the addition of a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor. Patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical intervention have shown a significant improvement in OS when treated with adjuvant capecitabine. The high mutation burden in metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) allows for targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. mTNBCs that express programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) receptors may achieve improved response and survival if their regimen includes a monoclonal antibody. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) can deliver high doses of chemotherapy and significantly impact survival in mTNBC regardless of the level of biomarkers expressed by the tumor cells. PARP inhibitors significantly improve survival in newly diagnosed, treatment-naive mTNBC, but have shown mixed results in patients with a history of previous therapy. PARP inhibitors may also target patients with somatic breast cancer (BRCA) and partner and localizer of BRCA-2 (PALB2) mutations, which would allow for more options in this subset of patients. While other rare targets have shown mixed results, the future of treatment may lie in anti-androgen therapy or the development of cancer vaccinations that may increase the immunogenicity of the tumor environment.

The management of TNBC includes treatment with multimodal chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and ADCs. The optimal approach depends on a multitude of factors, which include the stage of the tumor, its unique mutational burden, comorbid conditions, and the functional status of the patient. Physicians should be familiar with the advantages and disadvantages of each therapy in order to appropriately counsel and guide their patients.

Varying outcomes of triple-negative breast cancer in different age groups-prognostic value of clinical features and proliferation

PURPOSE

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive disease lacking specific biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. We evaluated the combined prognostic impact of clinical features and novel biomarkers of cell cycle-progression in age-dependent subgroups of TNBC patients.

METHODS

One hundred forty seven TNBC patients with complete clinical data and up to 18 year follow-up were collected from Turku University Hospital, Finland. Eight biomarkers for cell division were immunohistochemically detected to evaluate their clinical applicability in relation to patient and tumor characteristics.

RESULTS

Age at diagnosis was the decisive factor predicting disease-specific mortality in TNBC (p = 0.002). The established prognostic features, nodal status and Ki-67, predicted survival only when combined with age. The outcome and prognostic features differed significantly between age groups, middle-aged patients showing the most favorable outcome. Among young patients, only lack of basal differentiation predicted disease outcome, indicating 4.5-fold mortality risk (p = 0.03). Among patients aged > 57, the established prognostic features predicted disease outcome with up to 3.0-fold mortality risk for tumor size ≥ 2 cm (p = 0.001). Concerning cell proliferation, Ki-67 alone was a significant prognosticator among patients aged > 57 years (p = 0.009). Among the studied cell cycle-specific biomarkers, only geminin predicted disease outcome, indicating up to 6.2-fold increased risk of mortality for tumor size < 2 cm (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Traditional clinical features do not provide optimal prognostic characterization for all TNBC patients. Young age should be considered as an additional adverse prognostic feature in therapeutic considerations. Increased proliferation, as evaluated using Ki-67 or geminin immunohistochemistry, showed potential in detecting survival differences in subgroups of TNBC.

Quality of Life and Sexual Functioning of Women after Breast Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND: Women with breast cancer can experience changes in sexual functioning and body images that can seriously affect their quality of life. AIM: The aim of this research was to study the quality of life and sexual functioning of women after a mastectomy and after a breast-conserving surgery and to compare post-operative quality of life. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 204 participants, 101 patients after a mastectomy and 103 patients after a quadrantectomy. The research was conducted using the Croatian version of the questionnaire of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Breast Cancer, the questionnaire with the breast cancer module EORTC QLQ - BR 23. RESULTS: On the EORTC QLQ –BR23 scale, participants with mastectomy rated their sexual functioning (p < 0.001), sexual pleasure (p < 0.001), and systemic side effects (p = 0.04) lower comparing to women after breast-conserving surgery. The overall functionality scale was significantly lower (p = 0.03) for women who underwent mastectomy compared to those who underwent breast-conserving surgery. Participants under 51 years of age had worse body image 1 month after mastectomy (p = 0.006), while sexual functioning was better (p = 0.03) than in older age groups. In breast-conserving surgery group, 1 month after surgery, participants in the age group of 61 years and older assessed body image better (p = 0.04) than in the younger age group. Sexual functioning was rated better by women aged 51–60 years (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Results of this study show that women after breast conserving surgery have better quality of life, better sexual functioning and less side effects of systemic therapy compared to women after mastectomy. The type of surgery, patient’s age and time passed after completion of treatment are important factors which influence sexual functioning and quality of life in breast cancer survivors.

Overview of recent advances in metastatic triple negative breast cancer

Metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has an aggressive phenotype with a predilection for visceral organs and brain. Best responses to chemotherapy are predominately in the first line. Recent studies have demonstrated improved progression free survival with the combination of atezolizumab/pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in programmed death-ligand 1 positive metastatic TNBC. However, a recent trial in a similar population showed no benefit for atezoli-zumab and paclitaxel which led to a Food and Drug Administration alert. Two phase III trials (OLYMPIAD and BROCADE3) demonstrated a benefit in progression free survival (PFS) but not overall survival in patients with BRCA-associated metastatic TNBC treated with Olaparib or Talazoparib respectively. For those treated with Talazoparib, the time to deterioration in health related-quality of life was also longer compared to chemotherapy. The BROCADE3 trial demonstrated that the combination of a platinum and veliparib increased PFS in first-line metastatic TNBC but at the cost of increased toxicity. There are no head-to-head comparisons of a poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and platinums. There are unanswered questions regarding the role of PARPi maintenance after platinum therapy as is standard of care in BRCA-associated ovarian cancer. Other areas of therapeutic interest include targeting aberrations in the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway, protein kinase B, mammalian target of rapamycin or utilising antibody drug conjugates. This review focusses on recent and emerging therapeutic options in metastatic TNBC. We searched PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov and recent international meetings from American Society of Clinical Oncology, San Antonio Breast Cancer Conference and the European Society of Medical Oncology.

The prognostic impact of age in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer: a population-based study

Background

The aim of current study was to use competing risk model to calculate the potential differences that age played in the prognosis of different breast cancer subtypes.

Methods

The cohort was selected from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. The cumulative incidences of death (CID) was assessed for breast cancer caused deaths and other causes of mortality. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model and the multivariate subdistribution hazard (SH) model were used to evaluate the prognostic value of age in different breast cancer subtypes.

Results

We involved 33,968 breast cancer patients into our cohort. We found older patients had worse overall survival (OS) than young patients in hormone receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer (HR+/HER2+) (≥40 vs. <40, HR = 2.07, 95% CI [1.28-3.35], p < 0.05). However, when we used competing risk model, we found young age was an independent risk factor only for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (≥40 vs. <40, HR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.56-0.89], p < 0.05). No association was found in other groups.

Conclusion

Our research was currently the largest sample size study and the first competing risk model-based study on the prognostic association between age and different breast cancer subtypes. We found <40 years patients had worse breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) than older patients in the TNBC subtype.

Effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in T1N0M0 triple-negative breast cancer

OBJECTIVES

Patients with T1N0M0 breast cancers are considered to have an excellent prognosis, even in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), which is often associated with diminished recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival. Chemotherapy remains the only adjuvant treatment for TNBC, but evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy is beneficial for stage T1N0M0 TNBC patients is limited. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy and the benefit of taxanes in T1N0M0 TNBC patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cohort of 354 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed T1N0M0 TNBC between January 2008 and December 2015 were included from the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed to compare patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy with/without taxane addition.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 45 months. Chemotherapy was used in 92.4% of patients. The 5-year estimated RFS rates of patients with and without adjuvant chemotherapy were 94.5% and 83.6%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy and a lack of lymphovascular invasion were associated with a significant benefit for RFS. A significant RFS benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy was observed in T1c (hazard ratio, HR = 0.24, 95% CI [0.08-0.76], P = 0.014) but not in T1b (HR = 0.32, 95% CI [0.03-3.18], P = 0.330) subgroups. Addition of taxane to an anthracycline-based regimen was not significantly associated with improved RFS in T1N0M0 TNBC patients.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves recurrence-free survival in T1c TNBC patients but not in T1b. Anthracycline-based taxane-free regimens might be sufficient to achieve RFS benefits in T1N0M0 TNBC patients.

Optimal timing of delivery for women with breast cancer, according to cancer stage and hormone status: a decision-analytic model

OBJECTIVE

To compare strategies for the timing of delivery in women with breast cancer and known cancer stage or hormone receptor subtype, and to determine the optimal gestational age for induction in regards to maternal-fetal outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

A decision-analytic model was designed comparing eight different strategies for scheduled delivery at 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, and 37 weeks gestation. Optimal breast cancer treatment was assumed to be delayed until after delivery. Baseline estimates of the stage- and subtype-specific mortality and the impact of delayed cancer treatment on 5-year survival rates were obtained from the literature. Outcomes factored into the model included the risk of intrauterine fetal demise, spontaneous delivery, respiratory distress syndrome, cerebral palsy, and neonatal demise at each gestational age. Univariate sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to test the robustness of our model.

RESULTS

For women with stage I-II breast cancer, delivery at 36 weeks yielded the highest number of overall quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), while maternal QALYs were maximized with delivery at 34 weeks. For stage III and IV disease, maternal QALYs were maximized at 31 and 30 weeks, respectively. For women with estrogen or progesterone receptor-positive, human epidermal receptor-2 negative breast cancer, both maternal QALYs and overall QALYs were maximized with delivery at 36 weeks. More aggressive biological phenotypes were similarly associated with optimal delivery at decreasing gestational age. Our model was heavily driven by the baseline probability of maternal death within 5 years, in addition to the expected progression of disease and decreases in survival rates with each week of non-treatment, and remained robust across reasonable ranges for all variables of interest.

CONCLUSIONS

For women with breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy, decisions regarding timing of delivery should take into consideration both cancer stage and hormone receptor subtype.

Concurrent BRAF and PTEN mutations in melanoma of unknown origin presenting as a breast mass

BACKGROUND

Metastases represent a small percentage of the malignancies affecting the breast, and only 5% of melanomas originate from non-cutaneous sites. Multiple genetic aberrations have been associated with the development of melanocytic lesions, including BRAF V600E mutation. Mutations in PTEN gene have also been related to the pathogenesis of multiple malignancies.

PURPOSE/METHOD

This is the case of a 28-year-old female who presented with a tender, palpable mass in the upper outer quadrant of the right breast. Ultrasound showed a 1-cm solid mass, initially diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma on biopsy. During pre-operative workup, a second mass was identified and biopsied. Immunohistochemical stains performed on the second mass biopsy demonstrated that the neoplastic cells were positive for cytokeratin AE1/3, pan-melanoma, tyrosinase, and SOX-10 and negative for CK7, CAM5.2, and GATA-3. Subsequent workup showed widespread metastatic disease involving the liver, lungs, bones, and brain. The brain metastasis tested positive for BRAF p.V600E and PTEN p.R130Efs*4 mutations. Thorough skin and eye examination did not reveal a primary melanoma.

CONCLUSION

Only few reports have been published of melanoma presenting as a breast mass. This is an interesting case due to the clinical presentation, diagnostic challenges, and genetic mutations profile.