1
|
Lim WH, Tan C, Xiao J, Tan DJH, Ng CH, Yong JN, Fu C, Chan KE, Zeng RW, Ren YP, Goh XL, Chew N, Tseng M, Syn N, Mak LY, Fung J, Muthiah M, Siddiqui MS, Tan EXX. De novo metabolic syndrome after liver transplantation: a meta-analysis on cumulative incidence, risk factors, and outcomes. Liver Transpl 2023; 29:413-421. [PMID: 36724882 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Post-transplant metabolic syndrome (PTMS) has been associated with increased cardiovascular risk which significantly impacts the morbidity and mortality rates of liver transplant (LT) recipients. This study sought to conduct a meta-analysis and systematic review on the cumulative incidence, risk factors, and cardiovascular outcomes associated with de novo PTMS.Medline and Embase were searched for articles describing the incidence, risk factors, and cardiovascular outcomes of de novo PTMS. Meta-analysis of proportions was conducted to calculate incidence. Conventional pairwise analysis using random effects model was used to tabulate OR and hazard ratio for risk factors and cardiovascular outcomes, respectively. Fifteen studies involving 2683 LT recipients were included. Overall rate of de novo PTMS was 24.7% (CI: 18.0%-32.9%) over a mean follow-up period of 15.3 months and was highest in patients with NAFLD (60.0%, CI: 52.0%-67.5%) compared with other liver diseases. Older age (OR: 1.05, CI: 1.01-1.09, p = 0.02) and pre-LT type II diabetes mellitus (OR: 5.00, CI: 4.17-5.99, p < 0.01) were predictive factors of de novo PTMS. Patients with de novo PTMS had significantly higher likelihood of cardiovascular disease events compared with those who did not (hazard ratio: 2.42, CI: 1.54-3.81, p < 0.01). De novo PTMS is a common complication and is significantly associated with increased cardiovascular disease morbidity. High-risk patients such as elderly recipients, those with pre-LT type II diabetes mellitus, or NASH-related cirrhosis should undergo routine screening to allow timely intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Hui Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Caitlyn Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jieling Xiao
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Darren Jun Hao Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Cheng Han Ng
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jie Ning Yong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Clarissa Fu
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kai En Chan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Yi Ping Ren
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Xin Lei Goh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Chew
- Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Michael Tseng
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Biostatistics & Modelling Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lung Yi Mak
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - James Fung
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Mark Muthiah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Mohammad Shadab Siddiqui
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Eunice X X Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Czarnecka K, Czarnecka P, Tronina O, Bączkowska T, Durlik M. Multidirectional facets of obesity management in the metabolic syndrome population after liver transplantation. IMMUNITY INFLAMMATION AND DISEASE 2021; 10:3-21. [PMID: 34598315 PMCID: PMC8669703 DOI: 10.1002/iid3.538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The obesity pandemic has resulted in an increasing demand for liver transplantation and has significantly altered the profile of liver transplant candidates in addition to affecting posttransplantation outcomes. In this review, we discuss a broad range of clinical approaches that warrant attention to provide comprehensive and patient‐centred medical care to liver transplant recipients, and to be prepared to confront the rapidly changing clinical challenges and ensuing dilemmas. Adipose tissue is a complex and metabolically active organ. Visceral fat deposition is a key predictor of overall obesity‐related morbidity and mortality. Limited pharmacological options are available for the treatment of obesity in the liver transplant population. Bariatric surgery may be an alternative in eligible patients. The rapidly increasing prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a global concern; NAFLD affects both pre‐ and posttransplantation outcomes. Numerous studies have investigated pharmacological and nonpharmacological management of NAFLD and some of these have shown promising results. Liver transplant recipients are constantly exposed to numerous factors that result in intestinal microbiota alterations, which were linked to the development of obesity, diabetes type 2, metabolic syndrome (MS), NAFLD, and hepatocellular cancer. Microbiota modifications with probiotics and prebiotics bring gratifying results in the management of metabolic complications. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is successfully performed in many medical indications. However, the safety and efficacy profiles of FMT in immunocompromised patients remain unclear. Obesity together with immunosuppressive treatment, may affect the pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic properties of coadministered medications. Individualized immunosuppressive regimens are recommended following liver transplantation to address possible metabolic concerns. Effective and comprehensive management of metabolic complications is shown to yield multiple beneficial results in the liver transplant population and may bring gratifying results in improving long‐term survival rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kinga Czarnecka
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Nephrology and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsa, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paulina Czarnecka
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Nephrology and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsa, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Olga Tronina
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Nephrology and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsa, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Teresa Bączkowska
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Nephrology and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsa, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Magdalena Durlik
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Nephrology and Internal Diseases, Medical University of Warsa, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim NG, Sharma A, Saab S. Cardiovascular and metabolic disease in the liver transplant recipient. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2020; 46-47:101683. [PMID: 33158470 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2020.101683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Liver transplantation has led to great improvements in long-term survival in patients with decompensated liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of non-graft-related deaths and has increased prevalence in liver allograft recipients. This is partly secondary to higher post-transplant rates of metabolic risk factors-notably obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus, which comprise metabolic syndrome. Post-transplantation metabolic syndrome is expected to be a growing factor in morbidity and mortality as transplant candidates trend older, the rates of metabolic risk factors in the general population increase, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis grows disproportionally as an indication for transplantation, and post-transplantation survival lengthens. This review discusses the incidence and contributory factors for post-transplant increases in metabolic disease, as well as the burden of cardiovascular disease in the liver allograft recipient. Patients with pre-transplant diabetes or obesity are at particularly high risk for post-transplant metabolic syndrome, and would likely benefit from closer surveillance and more aggressive medical management of risk factors. In metabolic disease resistant to initial medical therapies, tailoring of immunosuppressive regimens may further assist in minimizing long-term cardiovascular disease, although this must be done with caution to avoid worsening the risk of graft failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan G Kim
- Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Avneesh Sharma
- Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Sammy Saab
- Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Peláez-Jaramillo MJ, Cárdenas-Mojica AA, Gaete PV, Mendivil CO. Post-Liver Transplantation Diabetes Mellitus: A Review of Relevance and Approach to Treatment. Diabetes Ther 2018; 9:521-543. [PMID: 29411291 PMCID: PMC6104273 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-018-0374-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Post-liver transplantation diabetes mellitus (PLTDM) develops in up to 30% of liver transplant recipients and is associated with increased risk of mortality and multiple morbid outcomes. PLTDM is a multicausal disorder, but the main risk factor is the use of immunosuppressive agents of the calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) family (tacrolimus and cyclosporine). Additional factors, such as pre-transplant overweight, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatitis C virus infection, may further increase risk of developing PLTDM. A diagnosis of PLTDM should be established only after doses of CNI and steroids are stable and the post-operative stress has been overcome. The predominant defect induced by CNI is insulin secretory dysfunction. Plasma glucose control must start immediately after the transplant procedure in order to improve long-term results for both patient and transplant. Among the better known antidiabetics, metformin and DPP-4 inhibitors have a particularly benign profile in the PLTDM context and are the preferred oral agents for long-term management. Insulin therapy is also an effective approach that addresses the prevailing pathophysiological defect of the disorder. There is still insufficient evidence about the impact of newer families of antidiabetics (GLP-1 agonists, SGLT-2 inhibitors) on PLTDM. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, course of disease and medical management of PLTDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Paula V Gaete
- Universidad de los Andes School of Medicine, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Carlos O Mendivil
- Universidad de los Andes School of Medicine, Bogotá, Colombia.
- Endocrinology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Thoefner LB, Rostved AA, Pommergaard HC, Rasmussen A. Risk factors for metabolic syndrome after liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2017; 32:69-77. [PMID: 28501338 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2017.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2016] [Revised: 02/10/2017] [Accepted: 03/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Metabolic syndrome is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events, which contributes to the elevated mortality rate among liver transplant recipients. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the prevalence and risk factors for metabolic syndrome after liver transplantation. METHODS The databases Medline and Scopus were searched for observational studies evaluating prevalence and risk factors for metabolic syndrome after liver transplantation. Meta-analyses were performed based on odds ratios (ORs) from multivariable analyses. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for assessment of bias. RESULTS The literature search generated 1815 records of which 16 articles were included comprising 3539 patients. The post-transplant prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 39%. Eight studies were eligible for meta-analyses, which showed that pre-transplant diabetes (OR=3.54, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.51-4.98) and pre-transplant obesity (OR=2.44, 95% CI: 1.48-4.03) were risk factors for metabolic syndrome. Six out of seven studies reported that recipients with metabolic syndrome had a higher incidence of cardiovascular events. Four studies showed that survival was not affected by metabolic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS The prevalences of metabolic syndrome and new-onset metabolic syndrome were high after liver transplantation. Metabolic syndrome was associated with cardiovascular events, but not poorer survival. Patients with pre-transplant diabetes and -obesity are at high risk of metabolic syndrome and should be under careful surveillance in order to prevent, earlier diagnose, and treat metabolic syndrome and thereby limit the risk of cardiovascular events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Line Buch Thoefner
- Rigshospitalet - University of Copenhagen, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Abdominal Centre, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Andreas Arendtsen Rostved
- Rigshospitalet - University of Copenhagen, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Abdominal Centre, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hans-Christian Pommergaard
- Rigshospitalet - University of Copenhagen, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Abdominal Centre, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Allan Rasmussen
- Rigshospitalet - University of Copenhagen, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Abdominal Centre, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Geng N, Xin YN, Xia HHX, Jiang M, Wang J, Liu Y, Chen LZ, Xuan SY. Association of PNPLA3 I148M Variant With Chronic Viral Hepatitis, Autoimmune Liver Diseases and Outcomes of Liver Transplantation. HEPATITIS MONTHLY 2015; 15:e26459. [PMID: 26034504 PMCID: PMC4449891 DOI: 10.5812/hepatmon.15(4)2015.26459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2014] [Revised: 02/15/2015] [Accepted: 03/01/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The PNPLA3 I148M variant has been recognized as a genetic determinant of liver fat content and a genetic risk factor of liver damage progression associated with steatohepatitis. The I148M variant is associated with many chronic liver diseases. However, its potential association with inflammatory and autoimmune liver diseases has not been established. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We systemically reviewed the potential associations of I148M variant with chronic viral hepatitis, autoimmune liver diseases and the outcome of liver transplantation, explored the underlying molecular mechanisms and tried to translate them into more individualized decision-making and personalized medicine. RESULTS There were associations between I148M variant and chronic viral hepatitis and autoimmune liver diseases and differential associations of I148M variant in donors and recipients with post-liver transplant outcomes. I148M variant may activate the development of steatosis caused by host metabolic disorders in chronic viral hepatitis, but few researches were found to illustrate the mechanisms in autoimmune liver diseases. The peripherally mediated mechanism (via extrahepatic adipose tissue) may play a principal role in triglyceride accumulation regardless of adiponutrin activity in the graft liver. CONCLUSIONS Evidences have shown the associations between I148M variant and mentioned diseases. I148M variant induced steatosis may be involved in the mechanism of chronic viral hepatitis and genetic considered personalized therapies, especially for PSC male patients. It is also crucial to pay attention to this parameter in donor selection and prognosis estimation in liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Geng
- Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao, P. R. China
| | - Yong-Ning Xin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, P. R. China
- Corresponding Authors: Yong-Ning Xin, Department of Gastroenterology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, P. O. Box: 266021, Qingdao, P. R. China. E-mail: ; Shi-Ying Xuan, Department of Gastroenterology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, P. O. Box: 266021, Qingdao, P. R. China. Tel: +86-53288905508, Fax: +86-53282031522, E-mail:
| | | | - Man Jiang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, P. R. China
| | - Jian Wang
- Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao, P. R. China
| | - Yang Liu
- Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao, P. R. China
| | - Li-Zhen Chen
- Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao, P. R. China
| | - Shi-Ying Xuan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao, P. R. China
- Corresponding Authors: Yong-Ning Xin, Department of Gastroenterology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, P. O. Box: 266021, Qingdao, P. R. China. E-mail: ; Shi-Ying Xuan, Department of Gastroenterology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, P. O. Box: 266021, Qingdao, P. R. China. Tel: +86-53288905508, Fax: +86-53282031522, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|