Diabetes is associated with poor short-term prognosis in patients with hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure

Active alcohol consumption is associated with acute-on-chronic liver failure in Hispanic patients

BACKGROUND

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a severe clinical entity associated with elevated short-term mortality. We aimed to characterize patients with decompensated cirrhosis according to presence of ACLF, their association with active alcohol intake, and long-term survival in Latin America.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of decompensated cirrhotic in three Chilean university centers (2017-2019). ACLF was diagnosed according EASL-CLIF criteria. We assessed survival using competing-risk and time-to-event analyses. We evaluated the time to death using accelerated failure time (AFT) models.

RESULTS

We included 320 patients, median age of 65.3±11.7 years old, and 48.4% were women. 92 (28.7%) patients met ACLF criteria (ACLF-1: 29.3%, ACLF-2: 27.1%, and ACLF-3: 43.4%). The most common precipitants were infections (39.1%), and the leading organ failure was kidney (59.8%). Active alcohol consumption was frequent (27.7%), even in patients with a prior diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (16.2%). Ninety-two (28.7%) patients had ACLF (ACLF-1: 8.4%, ACLF-2: 7.8%, and ACLF-3: 12.5%). ACLF patients had a higher MELD-Na score at admission (27 [22-31] versus 16 [12-21], p<0.0001), a higher frequency of alcohol-associated liver disease (36.7% versus 24.9%, p=0.039), and a more frequent active alcohol intake (37.2% versus 23.8%, p=0.019). In a multivariate model, ACLF was associated with higher mortality (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.735, 95%CI: 1.153-2.609; p<0.008). In the AFT models, the presence of ACLF during hospitalization correlated with a shorter time to death: ACLF-1 shortens the time to death by 4.7 times (time ratio [TR] 0.214, 95%CI: 0.075-0.615; p<0.004), ACLF-2 by 4.4 times (TR 0.224, 95%CI: 0.070-0.713; p<0.011), and ACLF-3 by 37 times (TR 0.027, 95%CI: 0.006-0.129; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with decompensated cirrhosis and ACLF exhibited a high frequency ofactive alcohol consumption. Patients with ACLF showed higher mortality and shorter time todeath than those without ACLF.

Impacts of the development of acute-on-chronic liver failure and bacterial infections on β-cell function and glucose homeostasis in patients with liver cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis involved in glucose metabolism disorders (GMDs) in patients with liver cirrhosis remains unclear.

AIMS

We investigated the effects of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) development and bacterial infections (BIs) on pancreatic β-cell function and glucose homeostasis in individuals with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 327 patients experiencing acute deterioration of liver cirrhosis. Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) and OGTT-based β-cell function indices were employed to assess β-cell function and glucose homeostasis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were employed to identify GMD-associated risk factors.

RESULTS

Both the development of ACLF and BIs significantly increased the prevalence of GMDs. Both ACLF and BIs markedly elevated the homeostasis model of assessment 2-insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR). ACLF significantly impaired glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, as evidenced by reduced insulinogenic index (IGI). Patients with GMDs exhibited significantly lower IGI levels than those without GMDs. Independent risk factors associated with GMDs were prothrombin activity (odds ratio [OR]=0.981, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.960-0.995), HOMA2-IR (OR=1.749, 95% CI: 1.130-2.707), and IGI (OR=0.963, 95% CI: 0.947-0.978).

CONCLUSIONS

In liver cirrhosis, the onset of ACLF impairs glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from β-cells. Both liver impairment and BIs contribute to increased insulin resistance, ultimately disturbing glucose homeostasis.

Risk factors for the mortality of hepatitis B virus-associated acute-on-chronic liver failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus-associated acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF) has been confirmed as a prevalent form of end-stage liver disease in people subjected to chronic HBV infection. However, there has been rare in-depth research on the risk factors for the mortality of HBV-ACLF. This study aimed at determining the risk factors for the mortality of HBV-ACLF.

METHODS

The relevant research was selected from four electronic databases that have been published as of August 2023. The existing research was reviewed in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The level of quality of previous research was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Moreover, a pooled estimate of the odds ratios (ORs) with their associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was provided through a meta-analysis. The data were combined, and the risk variables that at least two studies had considered were analyzed. The publication bias was examined through Egger's test and Begg's test.

RESULTS

Twenty two studies that conformed to the inclusion criteria were selected from 560 trials. Eight risk variables in terms of HBV-ACLF mortality were determined, which covered INR (OR = 1.923, 95% CI = 1.664-2.221, P < 0.001), Monocytes (OR = 1.201, 95% CI = 1.113-1.296, P < 0.001), Cirrhosis (OR = 1.432, 95% CI = 1.210-1.696, P < 0.001), HE (OR = 2.553, 95% CI = 1.968-3.312, P < 0.001), HE grade (OR = 2.059, 95% CI = 1.561-2.717, P < 0.001), SBP (OR = 1.383, 95% CI = 1.080-1.769, P = 0.010), Hyponatremia (OR = 1.941, 95% CI = 1.614-2.334, P < 0.001), as well as HRS (OR = 2.610, 95% CI = 1.669-4.080, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The most significant risk factors for HBV-ACLF mortality comprise HRS, HE, and HE grade, followed by INR and hyponatremia. The Monocytes, cirrhosis, and SBP have been confirmed as the additional key risk factors for HBV-ACLF mortality.

Liver Transplantation Within 7-Days of Listing Improves Survival in ACLF-3

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF-3) have a very high short-term mortality without liver transplantation (LT). Our objective was to determine whether early LT (ELT; ≤ 7 days from listing) had an impact on 1 year patient (PS) in patients with ACLF-3 compared to late LT (LLT; days 8-28 from listing).

METHODS

All adults with ACLF-3 listed for LT with the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) between 2005 and 2021 were included. We excluded status one patients and those with liver cancer or listed for multi-organ or living donor transplants. ACLF patients were identified using the European Association for the Study of the Liver-Chronic Liver Failure criteria. Patients were categorized as ACLF-3a and ACLF-3b.

RESULTS

During the study period, 7607 patients were listed with ACLF-3 (3a-4520, 3b-3087); 3498 patients with ACLF-3 underwent ELT and 1308 had LLT. The overall 1 year PS after listing was 64.4% in ACLF-3a and 50% in ACLF-3b. In 4806 ACLF-3 patients who underwent LT, 1 year PS was 86.2%, but those who had ELT had higher survival (87.1 vs. 83.6%, P = 0.001) than the LLT group. These survival benefits were seen in both ACLF-3a and ACLF-3b. On multivariable analysis, age (HR 1.02, CI 1.01-1.03), diabetes (HR 1.40, CI 1.16-1.68), respiratory failure (HR 1.76, CI 1.50-2.08), donor risk index > 1.7 (HR 1.24, CI 1.06-1.45), and LLT (HR 1.20, CI 1.02-1.43) were independent predictors of higher 1 year mortality while higher albumin (HR 0.89, CI 0.80-0.98) was associated with reduced mortality.

CONCLUSION

Early LT (≤ 7 days from listing) in ACLF-3 is associated with better 1 year survival compared to late LT (days 8-28 from listing).

Research progress on short-term prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure

INTRODUCTION

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a clinical syndrome characterized as a severe condition with rapid progression, poor therapeutic response and poor prognosis. Early and timely evaluation of the prognosis is helpful for providing appropriate clinical intervention and prolonging patient survival.

AREAS COVERED

Currently, there are no specific dynamic and comprehensive approaches to assess the prognosis of patients with ACLF. This article reviews the progress in evaluating the short-term prognosis of ACLF to provide future directions for more dynamic prospective large-scale multicenter studies and a basis for individualized and precise treatment for ACLF patients. We searched PubMed and Web of Science with the term 'acute on chronic liver failure' and 'prognosis.' There was no date or language restriction, and our final search was on 26 October 2022.

EXPERT OPINION

ACLF is a dynamic process, and the best prognostic marker is the clinical evolution of organ failure over time. New prognostic markers are developing not only in the fields of genetics and histology but also toward diversification combined with imaging. Determining which patients will benefit from continued advanced life support is a formidable challenge, and accurate short-term prognostic assessments of ACLF are a good approach to addressing this issue.

Hepatogenous diabetes: Knowledge, evidence, and skepticism

The diabetogenic potential of liver cirrhosis (LC) has been known for a long time, and the name "hepatogenous diabetes" (HD) was coined in 1906 to define the condition. Diabetes mellitus (DM) that develops as a consequence of LC is referred to as HD. In patients with LC, the prevalence rates of HD have been reported to vary from 21% to 57%. The pathophysiological basis of HD seems to involve insulin resistance (IR) and pancreatic β-cell dysfunction. The neurohormonal changes, endotoxemia, and chronic inflammation of LC initially create IR; however, the toxic effects eventually lead to β-cell dysfunction, which marks the transition from impaired glucose tolerance to HD. In addition, a number of factors, including sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, gut dysbiosis, and hyperammonemia, have recently been linked to impaired glucose metabolism in LC. DM is associated with complications and poor outcomes in patients with LC, although the individual impact of each type 2 DM and HD is unknown due to a lack of categorization of diabetes in most published research. In fact, there is much skepticism within scientific organizations over the recognition of HD as a separate disease and a consequence of LC. Currently, T2DM and HD are being treated in a similar manner although no standardized guidelines are available. The different pathophysiological basis of HD may have an impact on treatment options. This review article discusses the existence of HD as a distinct entity with high prevalence rates, a strong pathophysiological basis, clinical and therapeutic implications, as well as widespread skepticism and knowledge gaps.