1
|
Ahmed A, Lohiya S. A Retained Foreign Body as a Rare Cause of Small Bowel Obstruction (Gossypiboma): A Case Report. Cureus 2023; 15:e37185. [PMID: 37168161 PMCID: PMC10166400 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
A retained foreign body (RFB) is a rare but possible complication of surgery. Among the most common retained foreign bodies are sponges, which may include lap pads and gauze pieces. Surgical never events are errors in medical care that are identifiable and preventable but have serious consequences for the patient, making it an important problem in terms of the safety and credibility of a healthcare facility. They also pose a major medicolegal threat to healthcare organizations and a diagnostic challenge for surgeons. Herein, we present the case of a 35-year-old woman who presented with signs and symptoms of acute intestinal obstruction. She revealed a history of Caesarean section 11 months prior. She had a stormy postoperative course then and had to undergo a diagnostic laparoscopy for pus aspiration three months after surgery, where no finding other than pus was reported. Upon presentation at our tertiary care center, she was examined and found to have an RFB for 11 months. She was managed surgically with successful laparoscopic removal of the gossypiboma and consequent resolution of all her symptoms. Though rare, the possibility of an RFB, especially after open surgery, should be kept in mind when diagnosing patients who present with pain, mass in the abdomen, or symptoms of an infection. Laparotomy is the mainstay of treatment for gossypiboma, but successful laparoscopic removal of the RFB provides a definite treatment with the super-added benefits of laparoscopy. Laparoscopic removal of gossypiboma has been reported in the literature and demonstrated in our tertiary care center.
Collapse
|
2
|
Arad D, Finkelstein A, Rozenblum R, Magnezi R. Perceptions of surgical never events among interdisciplinary clinicians: Implications of a qualitative study for practice. Collegian 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.colegn.2022.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
3
|
Naqvi AZ, Magill H, Anjarwalla N. Intraoperative practices to prevent wrong-level spine surgery: a survey among 105 spine surgeons in the United Kingdom. Patient Saf Surg 2022; 16:6. [PMID: 35081968 PMCID: PMC8790839 DOI: 10.1186/s13037-021-00310-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Current literature suggests that wrong-level spine surgery is relatively common with far-reaching consequences. This study aims to assess the current practices of spinal surgeons across the UK with respect to the techniques implemented for correct level verification. Methods To assess the current practices of spinal surgeons across the UK with respect to the techniques implemented for level verification. The authors hypothesise the absence of a standardised technique used across spine surgeons in the UK. Practices amongst respondents will be ascertained via an electronic questionnaire designed to evaluate current practices of spinal surgeons whom are members of the British Association of Spinal Surgeons (BASS). The study data will include key information such as; the level of surgical experience, specific techniques used to perform level checks for each procedure and prior involvement with wrong-level spine surgery. Responses were collected over the period of 1 month with a reminder sent 2 weeks prior to closure of the survey. The data were collated and descriptive analyses performed on multiple-choice question answers and common themes established from free text answers. Results A total of 27% (n = 105/383) members responded. The vast majority had greater than 10 years’ experience. Intraoperative practices varied greatly with varying practices present for cervical, thoracic and lumbar level surgery. Only 38% (n = 40) of respondents re-checked the level intra-operatively, prior to instrumentation. Of the respondents 47.5% (n = 29/61) of surgeons had been involved in wrong level spinal surgery. Conclusion This study highlights the varying practices amongst spinal surgeons and suggests root cause for wrong-level spine surgery; where the level identified pre-incision was subsequently not the level exposed. We describe a novel safety-check adopted at our institute using concepts and lessons learnt from the WHO Checklist.
Collapse
|
4
|
Identification of Common Themes from Never Events Data Published by NHS England. World J Surg 2020; 45:697-704. [PMID: 33216170 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05867-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Never events (NEs) are serious clinical incidents that cause potentially avoidable harm and impose a significant financial burden on healthcare systems. The purpose of this study was to identify common never events. METHODS We analysed the NHS England NE data from 2012 to 2020 to identify common never events category and themes. RESULTS We identified 51 common NE themes in 4 main categories out of a total of 3247 NE reported during this period. Wrong-site surgery was the most common category (n = 1307;40.25%) followed by retained foreign objects (n = 901;27.75%); wrong implant or prosthesis (n = 425;13.09%); and non-surgical/infrequent ones (n = 614; 18.9%). Wrong-side (laterality) and wrong tooth removal were the most common wrong-site NE accounting for 300 (22.95%) and 263 (20.12%) incidents, respectively. There were 197 (15%) wrong-site blocks, 125 (9.56%) wrong procedures, and 96 (7.3%) wrong skin lesions excised. Vaginal swabs were the most commonly retained items (276;30.63%) followed by surgical swabs (164;18.20%) and guidewires (152;16.87%). There were 67 (7.44%) incidents of retained parts of instruments and 48 (5.33%) retained instruments. Wrong intraocular lenses (165; 38.82%) were the most common wrong implants followed by wrong hip prostheses (n = 94; 22.11%) and wrong knees (n = 91; 21.41%). Non-surgical events accounted for 18.9% (n = 614) of the total incidents. Misplaced naso-or oro-gastric tubes (n = 178;29%) and wrong-route administration of medications were the most common events in this category (n = 111;18%), followed by unintentional connection of a patient requiring oxygen to an air flow-meter (n = 93; 15%). CONCLUSION This paper identifies common NE categories and themes. Awareness of these might help reduce their incidence.
Collapse
|
5
|
Cardiopulmonary Bypass Video Is an Effective Learning Tool. Ochsner J 2020; 20:279-284. [PMID: 33071660 PMCID: PMC7529140 DOI: 10.31486/toj.19.0103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Surgical procedures require the collaboration of medical personnel with multiple skill sets who have different levels of training. Someone new to surgical procedures, such as a medical student, faces a steep learning curve. Studies have shown that video-assisted learning is associated with improved learning of surgical procedures. Methods: During their surgical rotation orientation, third-year medical students were invited via email to participate in a learning study featuring a cardiopulmonary bypass video. Study participants took a pretest, reviewed the locally developed video, and took a posttest and an attitudinal questionnaire after viewing the video. Results: A convenience sample of 31 third-year medical students participated in the study. Overall knowledge scores improved from pretest to posttest (36.9% vs 79.6%, P<0.001). In the posttest attitudinal questionnaire, students reported that they preferred video-assisted learning to reading written protocols (90.3% strongly agree/agree) and that they were more knowledgeable about the function of the cardiopulmonary bypass machine (80.7% strongly agree/agree) after viewing the video. Students also reported that the video would be useful during their surgical clerkships (90.4% strongly agree/agree). Conclusion: Video-assisted learning was associated with comprehension of the material immediately after viewing the video, and medical students considered it to be appropriate and useful. This educational video may benefit other learners who are entering the cardiopulmonary bypass operating room for the first time.
Collapse
|
6
|
Aghdassi SJS, Schwab F, Hansen S, Peña Diaz LA, Behnke M, Gastmeier P, Kramer TS. The quality of antimicrobial prescribing in acute care hospitals: results derived from a national point prevalence survey, Germany, 2016. EURO SURVEILLANCE : BULLETIN EUROPEEN SUR LES MALADIES TRANSMISSIBLES = EUROPEAN COMMUNICABLE DISEASE BULLETIN 2019; 24. [PMID: 31771705 PMCID: PMC6864975 DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2019.24.46.1900281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundRobust data on the quality of antimicrobial prescriptions in German acute care hospitals are scarce. To establish and implement antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) measures and to increase prudent antimicrobial use (AMU), the identification of appropriate process and quality indicators is pertinent.AimOur main objective was to identify parameters associated with adequate AMU and inadequate AMU by analysing point prevalence data. Our secondary goal was to describe the current state of AMS implementation in Germany.MethodsA national point prevalence survey for healthcare-associated infections and AMU was conducted in German hospitals in 2016. Data on structure and process parameters were also collected. Recorded antimicrobial prescriptions were divided into adequate, inadequate and undefinable AMU. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to examine the correlation of selected structure and process parameters with the adequacy of recorded antimicrobials.ResultsData from 218 acute care hospitals, 64,412 patients and 22,086 administered antimicrobials were included. Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that documentation of a reason for AMU in the patient notes increased the likelihood of adequate AMU and decreased the likelihood of inadequate AMU significantly (p < 0.001), while tertiary care hospital type had the opposite effect (p < 0.001).ConclusionThrough associating structural and process parameters with adequacy of AMU, we identified parameters that increased the odds of prudent AMU. Documentation was a key element for improving AMU. Revealed deficits regarding the implementation of AMS in German hospitals concerning dedicated staff for AMS activities and establishment of regular AMU training and AMU audits should be tackled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Schwab
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sonja Hansen
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luis Alberto Peña Diaz
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Behnke
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias Siegfried Kramer
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|