Differential cross-tolerance development between single and repeated immobilization stress on the antinociceptive effect induced by β-endorphin, 5-hydroxytryptamine, morphine, and WIN55,212-2 in the inflammatory mouse pain mode

Spinal cord-wide structural disruption in type 2 diabetes rescued by exenatide "a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue" via down-regulating inflammatory, oxidative stress and apoptotic signaling pathways

The mechanisms of spinal cord-wide structural and functional disruption in diabetic patients remain elusive. This study evaluated histopathological alterations of the spinal cord cytoarchitecture in T2DM model of rats and assessed the potential ameliorating effect of exenatide "a potent GLP-1 analogue". Thirty male rats were allocated into three groups; I (control), II (Diabetic): T2DM was induced by high fat diet for 8 weeks followed by a single I.P injection of STZ (25 mg/kg BW) and III (Diabetic/Exenatide): T2DM rats injected with exenatide (10 μg/Kg, S.C. twice daily for 2 weeks). Neurobehavioral sensory and motor tests were carried out and glycemic control biomarkers and indices of insulin resistance and sensitivity were measured. In addition, the spinal cord was processed for histological and immunohistochemical studies besides assessing its tissue homogenate levels of pro-inflammatory/anti-inflamatory cytokines and oxidant/antioxidant biomarkers. Moreover, RT-qPCR was performed to measure the expression of proapoptotic/antiapoptotic and neurotrophic genes. The diabetic rats exhibited thermal hyperalgesia, mechanical allodynia and decreased locomotor activity along with increased serum glucose, insulin, HbA1c, HOMA-IR while, quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) was decreased. Also, IL-1β NF-kB, MDA increased while IL-10, SOD activity and β-endorphin decreased in the spinal tissue. Up regulation of caspase-3 and down regulation of Bcl-2, nerve growth factor (NGF) and glial cell-derived neurotrophic (GDNF) in diabetic rats. Also, they exhibited histopathological changes and increased CD68 positive microglia and Bax immunoreactivity in the spinal cord. Subsequent to exenatide treatment, most biomolecular, structural and functional impairments of the spinal cord were restored in the diabetic rats. In conclusion, the neuro-modulating effect of exenatide against diabetic-induced spinal cord affection warrants the concern about its therapeutic relevance in confronting the devastating diabetic neuropathic complications.

Diabetic neuropathy is associated with increased pain perception, low serum beta-endorphin and increase insulin resistance among Nigerian cohorts in Ekiti State

INTRODUCTION

There has been an increase in the global prevalence of diabetic polyneuropathy and research evidence suggests that insulin resistance plays an important role in its development and prognosis. However, there seem to be a dearth of information in understanding the likely interplay between beta endorphin, insulin resistance and pain perception especially in the setting of painful diabetic neuropathy.

METHOD

This study recruited 120 volunteers divided into four groups (30 per group): group 1 healthy volunteer (control); group 2 DM type 2 without neuropathy (DM group); group 3 DM type 2 with painful neuropathy (DPN group); group 4 DM type 2 without painful neuropathy (DN). All subjects were evaluated for pain threshold and neuropathy using an ischemia-induced pain model and biothesiometer respectively. Their beta-endorphin, glycated hemoglobin, fasting plasma insulin, and HOMA values were determined and means compared using ANOVA.

RESULT

Serum beta-endorphin is significantly reduced in DN and DPN (∗p < 0.001) compared with the control and DM group. Also, DPN and DN patients have significantly increased insulin resistance compared to those without neuropathy (∗p < 0.001; ∗p < 0.0001 respectively). There is a significant positive correlation between the pain threshold and beta-endorphin in all the groups except DN group. The correlation between beta-endorphin and insulin resistance was negative and significant in control and DM groups only. Suggestive that the fact that insulin resistance plays an important role in diabetes polyneuropathy, does not alone explain the chronic pain perception noticed in the DPN patients.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that diabetic neuropathy patients have a poor endogenous opioid peptide system which is associated with increased pain perception and high insulin resistance. However, insulin resistance alone does not explain the chronic pain perception noticed in the DPN patients. Thus, further study is required.

The Molecular Signatures of Acute-immobilization-induced Antinociception and Chronic-immobilization-induced Antinociceptive Tolerance

In the present study, the productions of antinociception induced by acute and chronic immobilization stress were compared in several animal pain models. In the acute immobilization stress model (up to 1 hr immobilization), the antinociception was produced in writhing, tail-flick, and formalin-induced pain models. In chronic immobilization stress experiment, the mouse was enforced into immobilization for 1 hr/day for 3, 7, or 14 days, then analgesic tests were performed. The antinociceptive effect was gradually reduced after 3, 7 and 14 days of immobilization stress. To delineate the molecular mechanism involved in the antinociceptive tolerance development in the chronic stress model, the expressions of some signal molecules in dorsal root ganglia (DRG), spinal cord, hippocampus, and the hypothalamus were observed in acute and chronic immobilization models. The COX-2 in DRG, p-JNK, p-AMPKα1, and p-mTOR in the spinal cord, p-P38 in the hippocampus, and p-AMPKα1 in the hypothalamus were elevated in acute immobilization stress, but were reduced gradually after 3, 7 and 14 days of immobilization stress. Our results suggest that the chronic immobilization stress causes development of tolerance to the antinociception induced by acute immobilization stress. In addition, the COX-2 in DRG, p-JNK, p-AMPKα1, and p-mTOR in the spinal cord, p-P38 in the hippocampus, and p-AMPKα1 in the hypothalamus may play important roles in the regulation of antinociception induced by acute immobilization stress and the tolerance development induced by chronic immobilization stress.

Endogenous cannabinoid modulation of restraint stress-induced analgesia in thermal nociception

It is thought that endogenous cannabinoids have a role in the analgesia induced by specific forms of stress. We examined if the role of endogenous cannabinoids is also dependent upon the mode of nociception, and whether this could be altered by drugs which block their enzymatic degradation. In C57BL/6 mice, restraint stress produced analgesia in the hot-plate and plantar tests, two thermal pain assays that engage distinct supraspinal and spinal nociceptive pathways. Stress-induced analgesia in the hot-plate test was abolished by pre-treatment with the opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone but was unaffected by the cannabinoid receptor antagonist 1-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-4-methyl-N-4-morpholinyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (AM281). By contrast, stress-induced analgesia in the plantar test was abolished by pre-treatment with naltrexone plus AM281, but not by either antagonist individually. Remarkably, inhibiting the breakdown of endocannabinoids, with the dual fatty acid amide hydrolase and monoacylglycerol lipase inhibitor JZL195, rescued stress-induced analgesia in the hotplate test when endogenous opioid signalling was blocked by naltrexone. Furthermore, JZL195 recruited analgesia induced by sub-threshold restraint stress in both thermal pain assays. These findings indicate the role of endocannabinoids in stress-induced analgesia differs with the type of thermal pain behaviour. However, by inhibiting their breakdown, endocannabinoids can be recruited to substitute for endogenous opioid signalling when their activity is blocked, indicating a degree of redundancy between opioid and cannabinoid systems. Together these data suggest targeting endocannabinoid breakdown could provide an alternative, or adjuvant to mainstream analgesics such as opioids.

Antidepressant-like effects of BU10119, a novel buprenorphine analogue with mixed κ/μ receptor antagonist properties, in mice

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The κ receptor antagonists have potential for treating neuropsychiatric disorders. We have investigated the in vivo pharmacology of a novel buprenorphine analogue, BU10119, for the first time.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

To determine the opioid pharmacology of BU10119 (0.3-3 mg·kg^-1 , i.p.) in vivo, the warm-water tail-withdrawal assay was applied in adult male CD1 mice. A range of behavioural paradigms was used to investigate the locomotor effects, rewarding properties and antidepressant or anxiolytic potential of BU10119. Additional groups of mice were exposed to a single (1 × 2 h) or repeated restraint stress (3× daily 2 h) to determine the ability of BU10119 to block stress-induced analgesia.

KEY RESULTS

BU10119 alone was without any antinociceptive activity. BU10119 (1 mg·kg^-1 ) was able to block U50,488, buprenorphine and morphine-induced antinociception. The κ antagonist effects of BU10119 in the tail-withdrawal assay reversed between 24 and 48 h. BU10119 was without significant locomotor or rewarding effects. BU10119 (1 mg·kg^-1 ) significantly reduced the latency to feed in the novelty-induced hypophagia task and reduced immobility time in the forced swim test, compared to saline-treated animals. There were no significant effects of BU10119 in either the elevated plus maze or the light-dark box. Both acute and repeated restraint stress-induced analgesia were blocked by pretreatment with BU10119 (1 mg·kg^-1 ). Parallel stress-induced increases in plasma corticosterone were not affected.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

BU10119 is a mixed κ/μ receptor antagonist with relatively short-duration κ antagonist activity. Based on these preclinical data, BU10119 has therapeutic potential for the treatment of depression and other stress-induced conditions.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed section on Emerging Areas of Opioid Pharmacology. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v175.14/issuetoc.

Brief Isolation Changes Nociceptive Behaviors and Compromises Drug Tests in Mice

Herding with a litter is known to comfort rodents, whereas isolation and grouping with noncagemates provoke stress. The effects of stress induced by isolation and grouping with noncagemates on pain responses, and their underlying mechanisms remain elusive. We assessed the effect of isolation, a common condition during behavioral tests, and of grouping on defecation and pain behaviors of mice. Fecal pellets were counted 2 hours after exposure to the test chamber. It is significantly more in the isolated mice than in the grouped mice. Hindpaw withdrawal threshold and withdrawal latency were adopted as the indicatives of mechanical and thermal pain sensitivities, respectively. Interestingly, isolated mice showed higher pain thresholds than mice grouping with cagemates, and even those with noncagemates, indicating analgesic effects. Such effects were reduced by intrathecal injection of 0.01 mg/kg of naloxone (opioid receptor antagonist), atosiban (oxytocin and vasopressin receptor antagonist), and ketanserin (5-HT receptor antagonist). Intraperitoneal delivery of 1 mg/kg of naloxone and atosiban, but not ketanserin, also alleviated the isolation-induced analgesic effects. In contrast, these drugs at the same dose had no significant effect on the mice grouping with cagemates. In addition, the effect of morphine on thermal pain was more robust in the mice grouping with cagemates than in the isolated mice. These data demonstrated that brief isolation caused analgesia, mediated by endogenous opioidergic, oxytocinergic, and serotonergic pathways. These results indicate that isolation during pain behavioral tests can affect pain responses and the efficacy of drugs; thus, nociception tests should be conducted in grouping.

Significance of neuronal cytochrome P450 activity in opioid-mediated stress-induced analgesia

Stressful environmental changes can suppress nociceptive transmission, a phenomenon known as "stress-induced analgesia". Depending on the stressor and the subject, opioid or non-opioid mechanisms are activated. Brain μ opioid receptors mediate analgesia evoked either by exogenous agents (e.g. morphine), or by the release of endogenous opioids following stressful procedures. Recent work with morphine and neuronal cytochrome P450 (P450)-deficient mice proposed a signal transduction role for P450 enzymes in µ analgesia. Since µ opioid receptors also mediate some forms of stress-induced analgesia, the present studies assessed the significance of brain P450 activity in opioid-mediated stress-induced analgesia. Two widely-used models of opioid stress-induced analgesia (restraint and warm water swim) were studied in both sexes of wild-type control and P450-deficient (Null) mice. In control mice, both stressors evoked moderate analgesic responses which were blocked by pretreatment with the opioid antagonist naltrexone, confirming the opioid nature of these responses. Consistent with literature, sex differences (control female>control male) were seen in swim-induced, but not restraint-induced, analgesia. Null mice showed differential responses to the two stress paradigms. As compared with control subjects, Null mice showed highly attenuated restraint-induced analgesia, showing a critical role for neuronal P450s in this response. However, warm water swim-induced analgesia was unchanged in Null vs. control mice. Additional control experiments confirmed the absence of morphine analgesia in Null mice. These results are the first to show that some forms of opioid-mediated stress-induced analgesia require brain neuronal P450 activity.

Randomized Trial of Lower Extremity Splinting to Manage Neuropathic Pain and Sleep Disturbances in People Living with HIV/AIDS

Background/Aims:

Distal symmetrical peripheral neuropathy (DSPN) and sleep disturbances are among the most common complications reported in people living with the human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (PLWHA). DSPN-pain is predominantly managed by using systemic agents with little evidence supporting their analgesic efficacy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of nighttime lower extremity splinting application on DSPN-related pain and sleep disturbances compared to a parallel splint liner application in PLWHA.

Methods:

Forty-six PLWHA and DSPN were randomized to nighttime wearing of bilateral lower extremity splints or the liners only. Pain and sleep outcomes were measured at baseline, week 3, and week 6. The pain was measured using the Neuropathic Pain Scale and sleep using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.

Results:

Pain and sleep scores improved in both groups over time. The median percentage pain reduction at week 6 was 8% in the liner group and 34% in the splint group. The change in pain scores in the splint group was found to be significant over time, P < .0005. The contrast between the splint and liner groups was underpowered (26%) and was not found to be significant, P > .05. Sleep scores improved 20% from baseline to the end of the study in both groups; all participants were classified as poor sleepers.

Conclusion:

The 6-week use of nighttime splints reduces DSPN-pain possibly by providing peripheral inhibition of external stimuli. Future studies are needed to validate this inhibitory intervention to manage DSPN in PLWHA and other neuropathic conditions.

Suppression of adrenal gland-derived epinephrine enhances the corticosterone-induced antinociceptive effect in the mouse formalin test

BACKGROUND

There is both clinical and experimental evidence to support the application of corticosterone in the management of inflammation and pain. Corticosterone has been used to treat painful inflammatory diseases and can produce antinociceptive effects. Epinephrine is synthesized from norepinephrine by the enzyme phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PNMT) and works as an endogenous adrenoceptor ligand secreted peripherally by the adrenal medulla. It is currently unclear whether corticosterone's antinociceptive effect is associated with the modulation of peripheral epinephrine.

METHODS

We first determined whether exogenous corticosterone treatment actually produced an antinociceptive effect in a formalin-induced pain model, and then examined whether this corticosterone-induced antinociceptive effect was altered by suppression of adrenal-derived epinephrine, using the following three suppression methods: (1) inhibition of the PNMT enzyme; (2) blocking peripheral epinephrine receptors; and (3) adrenalectomy.

RESULTS

Exogenous treatment with corticosterone at a high dose (50 mg/kg), but not at lower doses (5, 25 mg/kg), significantly reduced pain responses in the late phase. Moreover, injection of 2,3-dichloro-a-methylbenzylamine, a PNMT enzyme inhibitor, (10 mg/kg) before corticosterone treatment caused a leftward shift in the dose-response curve for corticosterone and injection of propranolol (5 mg/kg), but not phentolamine, also shifted the dose-response curve to the left during the late phase. Chemical sympathectomy with 6-hydroxydopamine had no effect on corticosterone-induced antinociceptive effect, but injection of a low dose of corticosterone produced an antinociceptive effect in adrenalectomized animals.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that suppression of epinephrine, derived from adrenal gland, enhances the antinociceptive effect of exogenous corticosterone treatment in an inflammatory pain model.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2011

This paper is the thirty-fourth consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2011 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurologic disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration (Section 16); and immunological responses (Section 17).