A study of analytical methods for the determination of propofol in blood

Simple quantification of propofol and its metabolites in blood and urine using gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS)

An analytical method which was used for the simultaneous detection and quantification of propofol and its metabolites in human blood and urine by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) was newly established and applied to authentic human samples obtained from the deceased. The QuEChERS method was employed, and then analyzed by GC-MS/MS. We separately used sulfatase and β-glucuronidase to hydrolyze the urine sample and calculated the increase of propofol and 4-hydroxypropofol before and after the hydrolysis. The results of urinary concentrations in urine from the subject were: 4.88 μg/mL for propofol, 0.53 μg/mL for 4-hydroxypropofol, 3.35 μg/mL for propofol-glucuronide, 0.31 μg/mL for the total concentration of 1-(2,6-diisopropyl-1,4-quinol)-glucuronide plus 4-(2,6-diisopropyl-1,4-quinol)-glucuronide, and 0.39 μg/mL for 4-(2,6- diisopropyl-1,4-quinol)-sulfate. The lower limit of quantification was 10 ng/mL for all determined compounds; the extraction recoveries were not less than 57.2 %. Intraday and interday precisions and accuracies were all less than 10 %. The calibration curves for propofol and 4-hydroxypropofol in human urine showed the correlation values of not less than 0.999; propofol and 4-hydroxypropofol in blood also presented good linearities in the concentration ranges of 0.1-10 μg/mL. The two compounds had good stability within 7 days at 25, 4, and -20 ℃. To our knowledge, this is the first trial to establish a simple and reliable method to simultaneously detect and quantify of propofol and its phase I and II metabolites in human blood and urine samples by GC-MS/MS.

[Propofol: use, toxicology and assay features]

The study objective is to review the literature on the use, pharmacological properties, toxicology, and assay methods for intravenous anesthetic propofol. The scope and forms of propofol use, its pharmacokinetics, biotransformation features, which occurs more than 90% in the liver, and side effects associated with propofol use for anesthesia, are addressed. Propofol infusion syndrome (also known as PrIS) and deaths from propofol overdose due to medical errors, abuse, suicide attempts, and homicide are reported. Propofol identification and assay methods based on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and liquid chromatography (LC) are described. The features of the methods performance are outlined; biological materials (the study objects) are listed: mainly blood and plasma, as well as urine, bile, hair, etc. The relevance of a comprehensive forensic chemical study of propofol is indicated, though there are few forensic studies of propofol.

Quantitative analysis of human brain microdialysate for target site pharmacokinetics of major anesthetics ketamine, midazolam and propofol

Brain microdialysis samples of intensive care patients treated with the essential anesthetics ketamine, midazolam and propofol were investigated. Importantly, despite decades of clinical use, comprehensive human cerebral pharmacokinetic data of these drugs is still missing. To encounter this apparent lack of knowledge, we combined cerebral microdialysis with leading-edge analytical instrumentation to monitor the neurochemistry of living human patients. For the quantitative analysis, high performing analytical approaches were developed that can handle minute sample volumes and possible ultralow target analyte levels. The developed methods provided detection limits below 100 ng L^-1 for all target analytes and high precision (below 4% RSD intraday). Methods were linear between LODs and 100 μg L^-1 for ketamine, 75 μg L^-1 for midazolam and 10 μg L^-1 for propofol respectively, with coefficients of determination R²≥ 0.999. Further, being aware of the error-prone and demanding translation of microdialysis levels to interstitial concentrations, in vitro approaches for recovery testing of microdialysis probes as well as internal normalization approaches were conducted. Thus, we herein report the first cerebral pharmacokinetic data of ketamine, midazolam and propofol determined in microdialysis samples of 15 neurointensive care patients. We could prove blood-brain barrier penetration of all of the investigated anesthetics and could correlate applied dosages and actual brain exposition of ketamine. However, we emphasize the need of an expanded prospective study including individual microdialysis recovery testing as well as matched serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid collection for a more comprehensive cerebral pharmacokinetic understanding.

Drug detection in decomposed cadavers confirms testimonial evidence in a case of serial homicides

Toxicology investigation on human's buried dead bodies is a rare and challenging task in the forensic field. As requested by the Judicial Authority, this work aimed to verify testimonial evidence that emerged during a criminal investigation involving multiple murder cases. The statements indicated an improper medical administration of one or more alleged drugs (propofol, morphine, diazepam, and midazolam) which presumably caused the deaths. Since the supposed crimes took place several years before, the task of the present work was to obtain results to support the charges. The analyses involved 18 biological samples taken from four exhumed bodies, three of which were female and one male, each buried in a different date and mode. Each sample was treated with specific purification and extraction techniques (LLE - SPE) after the addition of the deuterated analogs of the searched analytes (propofol-d17, morphine-d3, diazepam-d5, midazolam-d4) as internal standards. Afterwards, the extracts were subjected to qualitative analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-Electron Impact (GC/MS - EI), both in full scan and SIM mode. Propofol, morphine, and diazepam were identified in the corpses. It supports testimonials that were administered just before the deaths occurred.

Determination of drugs in exhumed liver and brain tissue after over 9 years of burial by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-Part 2: Benzodiazepines, opioids, and further drugs

In this publication, benzodiazepines, opioids, and further drugs were analyzed in exhumed brain and liver tissue samples in 116 cases (total) after 9.5-16.5 years of burial. Solid phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was applied. Data from literature is listed summarizing the detectability of the presented analytes after a certain time of burial. In our study, 60% of the analyzed benzodiazepines, 100% of the opioids, and 82% of further drugs were detectable. Only the benzodiazepines lorazepam, nitrazepam, flunitrazepam, and its metabolite norflunitrazepam, and the drugs butylscopolamine, metronidazole, and omeprazole were not detectable at all. Percentage of positive findings (total, and separately for brain and liver tissue) and postmortem period are listed for each analyte. Correlation of detectability depending on postmortem period and condition of tissue are presented exemplarily for midazolam. No substantial correlation was observed. Despite a long time of burial, most benzodiazepines, opioids, and further drugs were detectable in the examined tissue samples. Our results may be a good support for future exhumations in which toxicological analyses are relevant.

Rapid determination and continuous monitoring of propofol in microliter whole blood sample during anesthesia by paper spray ionization-mass spectrometry

Propofol is a widely used intravenous anesthetic agent in sedation and general anesthesia. To improve the safety and maintain the depth of anesthesia, it is important to develop a rapid, sensitive, and reliable method to monitor the concentration of propofol in blood during anesthesia continuously. Here, we present a novel strategy based on paper spray ionization-mass spectrometry (PSI-MS) to detect propofol. Samples (in 10 μL) were mixed with methanol as protein precipitation solvent and 2,6-dimethylphenol as internal standard. Protein micro-precipitation was achieved with methanol by vortexing and centrifuging for 5 s each, and propofol was extracted to the supernatant. PSI-MS was performed in negative ionization mode, and MS signal lasted for 1 min. The analysis of a single sample was completed within 2 min. The area ratios of propofol to internal standard were calculated for quantification. Limit of detection of 5.5 ng mL^-1 and limit of quantification of 18.2 ng mL^-1 were achieved for propofol in whole blood. Calibration curve was linear in the range of 0.02-10 μg mL^-1. The developed method was used successfully in monitoring the propofol concentration in 3 patients' whole blood during anesthesia, showing its further application in controlling and feeding-back target concentration infusion. Graphical abstract.

A sensitive liquid chromatography method for analysis of propofol in small volumes of neonatal blood

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Sampling volumes of blood from neonates is necessarily limited. However, most of the published propofol analysis assays require a relatively large blood sample volume (typically ≥0.5 mL). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop and validate a sensitive method requiring a smaller sample volume (0.2 mL) to fulfill clinically relevant research requirements.

METHODS

Following simple protein precipitation and centrifugation, the supernatant was injected into the HPLC-fluorescence system and separated with a reverse phase column. Propofol and the internal standard (thymol) were detected and quantified using fluorescence at excitation and emission wavelengths of 270 nm and 310 nm, respectively. The method was validated with reference to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for industry. Accuracy (CV, %) and precision (RSD, %) were evaluated at three quality control concentration levels (0.05, 0.5 and 5 µg/mL).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Calibration curves were linear in the range of 0.005-20 µg/mL. Intra- and interday accuracy (-4.4%-13.6%) and precision (0.2%-5.8%) for propofol were below 15%. The calculated LOD (limit of detection) and LLOQ (lower limit of quantification) were 0.0021 µg/mL and 0.0069 µg/mL, respectively. Propofol samples were stable for 4 months at -20°C after the sample preparation. This method was applied for analyzing blood samples from 41 neonates that received propofol, as part of a dose-finding study. The measured median (range) concentration was 0.14 (0.03-1.11) µg/mL, which was in the range of the calibration curve. The calculated median (range) propofol half-life of the gamma elimination phase was 10.4 (4.7-26.7) hours.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

A minimal volume (0.2 mL) of blood from neonates is required for the determination of propofol with this method. The method can be used to support the quantification of propofol drug concentrations for pharmacokinetic studies in the neonatal population.

Development of a highly sensitive gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method preceded by solid-phase microextraction for the analysis of propofol in low-volume cerebral microdialysate samples

To date, the commonly used intravenous anesthetic propofol has been widely studied, and fundamental pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics of the drug are known. However, propofol has not yet been quantified in vivo in the target organ, the human brain. Here, cerebral microdialysis offers the unique opportunity to sample propofol in the living human organism. Therefore, a highly sensitive analytical method for propofol quantitation in small sample volumes of 30 μL, based on direct immersion solid‐phase microextraction was developed. Preconcentration was followed by gas chromatographic separation and mass spectrometric detection of the compound. This optimized method provided a linear range between the lower limit of detection (50 ng/L) and 200 μg/L. Matrix‐matched calibration was used to compensate recovery issues. A precision of 2.7% relative standard deviation between five consecutive measurements and an interday precision of 6.4% relative standard deviation could be achieved. Furthermore, the permeability of propofol through a cerebral microdialysate system was tested. In summary, the developed method to analyze cerebral microdialysate samples, allows the in vivo quantitation of propofol in the living human brain. Additionally the calculation of extracellular fluid levels is enabled since the recovery of the cerebral microdialysis regarding propofol was determined.

Selective and Accurate Determination Method of Propofol in Human Plasma by Mixed-Mode Cation Exchange Cartridge and GC-MS

A gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method for the determination of propofol in human plasma has been developed and validated. Propofol was extracted from human plasma by using mixed-mode cation exchange/reversed-phase (MCX) cartridges. As propofol easily volatilizes during concentration, 100% methanol was injected directly into GC-MS to elute propofol. Despite avoiding concentration process of the eluted solution, lower limit of quantization (LLOQ) of propofol was 25 ng/mL. The validated method exhibited good linearity (R (2) = 0.9989) with accuracy and precision -5.8%~11.7% and 3.7%~11.6%, respectively. The other validation parameters, recovery and matrix effect, ranged from 96.6% to 99.4% and 95.3% to 101.4%, respectively. Propofol standard was quantified to evaluate possible loss due to the concentration processes, nitrogen gas and centrifugal vacuum. These two concentration processes resulted in notable decrease in the quantity of propofol, signifying avoiding any concentration processes during propofol quantification. Also, to confirm suitability of the developed method, authentic human plasma samples were analyzed. The selective assay method using MCX cartridge and GC-MS facilitated quantification of propofol in plasma sample accurately by preventing any losses due to the concentration processes.

[Brain death diagnosis after sedation with propofol or sufentanil. Recommendations for the usage of toxicological analytics]

BACKGROUND

Before the clinical diagnosis of brain death is made, toxicological analyses are often performed for the exclusion of effective serum levels of previously applied sedating drugs. For propofol and sufentanil there are no uniform recommendations for the usage of toxicology test results.

OBJECTIVES

To develop a standard practice in the diagnosis of brain death after therapeutic application of one of these drugs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Based on the current literature and the available analytical assays, an ad hoc working group consisting of specialists in toxicology and intensive care medicine compiled recommendations for the usage of toxicological analytics in the diagnosis of brain death at the Rostock University Hospital.

RESULTS

For propofol, current analytical assays allow the quantification of serum concentrations of 0.2 μg/ml and lower; the execution of clinical brain death diagnostics is recommended by the ad hoc group only at propofol serum levels lower than  0.4 μg/ml. For sufentanil, the currently prevalent assays set lower determination limits of about 0.2 ng/ml in serum and 0.1 ng/ml in urine, which is above the cautiously adopted lower therapeutic serum concentration of 0.02 ng/ml. Therefore after negative determination of sufentanil (< 0.2 ng/ml) in blood serum, the following alternative procedures are recommended: (1) the execution of clinical brain death diagnostics under administration of naloxone; or (2) at intact renal function the additional negative determination of sufentanil in urine (< 0.1 ng/ml). If an assay allowing the detection of sufentanil at ≤ 0.01 ng/ml is available, brain death diagnostics should be carried out only at a serum level lower than  0.02 ng/ml.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations may serve as a proposal for similar standards in other hospitals.