The frequency of low HER2 expression in breast cancer and a comparison of prognosis between patients with HER2-low and HER2-negative breast cancer by HR status

The search for a TNBC vaccine: the guardian vaccine

Nearly 20 million people are diagnosed with cancer each year with breast cancer being the most common among women. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), defined by its no/low expression of ER and PR and lack of amplification of HER2, makes up 15-20% of all breast cancer cases. While patients overall have a higher response to chemotherapy, this subgroup is associated with the lowest survival rate indicating significant clinical and molecular heterogeneity demanding alternate treatment options. Therefore, new therapies have been explored, with a large focus on utilizing the immune system. A whole host of immunotherapies have been studied including immune checkpoint inhibitors, now standard of care for eligible patients, and possibly the most exciting and promising is that of a TNBC vaccine. While currently there are no approved TNBC vaccines, this review highlights many promising studies and points to an antigen, p53, which we believe is highly relevant for TNBC.

Patterns of Recurrence and Survival Outcomes of HER2-Low Expression in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To characterize site-specific recurrence patterns and survival outcomes of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer at a single institution in China from January 2010 to December 2020. Patterns of the first site of recurrence were compared between patients with HER2-low and HER2-0 tumors using competing risks regression analysis. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 2055 patients were analyzed (median follow-up 52.3 months), comprising 1102 (53.6%) patients with HER2-low and 953 (46.4%) with HER2-0 tumors. Patients with HER2-0 tumors had a significantly higher 5-year cumulative incidence of visceral recurrence than those with HER2-low tumors (7.20% vs. 4.50%; P = .046), especially for the lung recurrence (4.16% vs. 2.81%; P = .044). In the hormone receptor (HoR)-positive subgroup, HER2-low patients had a significantly higher risk of local recurrence (10-year cumulative incidence rate, 7.58% vs. 2.61%; P = .013) but a relatively lower risk of contralateral breast cancer (10-year cumulative incidence rate, 0.90% vs. 4.53%; P = .044) compared with HER2-0 patients. Nevertheless, there were no significant differences between the HER2-0 and HER2-low patients regarding the time to all sites of recurrence after adjusting other potential risk factors (all P > .05), DFS (P = .763), and OS (P = .106).

CONCLUSION

Site-specific recurrence patterns differ between HER2-low and HER2-0 patients. However, it does not support that HER2-low breast cancer is a distinct prognostic subtype.

Prognostic difference between early breast cancer patients with HER2 low and HER2 zero status

We aimed to investigate the differences in prognosis between patients with HER2-low and HER2-zero status. This retrospective cohort study conducted at multi-institution included 1627 patients diagnosed with HER2-low or HER2-zero breast cancer (stages I-III). Survival analysis after propensity score matching was used. In total, 445 patients with HER2-low and 707 patients with HER2-zero status were included. The median follow-up was 92.7 months. Locoregional and distant recurrence-free survival were comparable between patients with HER2-low and HER2-zero status (p = 0.872, p = 0.746, respectively). HER2-low status did not affect overall survival. However, in subgroups with lymph node metastases, patients with HER2-low status showed better recurrence-free survival compared with that of patients with HER2-zero status (p = 0.033). In conclusion, survival outcomes were comparable between patients with HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancer. More studies are needed to validate our findings and examine the biological mechanism underlying these prognostic differences.

Activity and Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Luminal-HER2 Negative Early Breast Cancer According to HER2 Score (Low vs. Score 0): A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The predictive and prognostic role of HER2 status in patients with luminal-HER2 negative early breast cancer (BC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. A retrospective analysis evaluating the correlation between HER2 status (low vs. score 0) and pCR/IDFS was conducted.

METHODS

Patients with BC undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery were included. HER2 low BC was defined as IHC 1+ or 2+ with negative FISH. Logistic regression model and Cox proportional hazard model were adopted to investigate the independent role of HER2 status and outcomes of interest (pCR, CPS-EG and IDFS).

RESULTS

About 566 patients were included: 60% were HER2 low and 40% were HER2 0. pCR was achieved in 13.2% of HER2 low versus 17.7% of HER2 0 (P = .15). There was no correlation between baseline HER2 status and CPS-EG score (P = .18). A trend toward improved IDFS for HER2 low BC was observed (P = .07). The relapse rate of the HER2 0 cohort peaked at 12 months after surgery, similar to the HER2 low cohort, which showed an additional peak at 36 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Among Luminal-HER2 negative early BCs, our results do not support a clear predictive and prognostic effect of HER2 status, although a trend of worse pCR and better survival for HER2 low BCs cannot be ruled out.

Effect of HER2-low status on brain metastasis-free survival and survival after brain metastasis in patients with breast cancer

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The discovery of novel human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed antibody‒drug conjugates has accelerated the identification of the HER2-low subtype. However, the biological significance of low HER2 expression in breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) is unclear.

METHODS

Patients with HER2-negative BC and brain metastasis were retrospectively screened between February 2012 and November 2023. Brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS) and survival after brain metastasis (SABM) were analyzed according to HER2 expression.

RESULTS

A total of 201 female patients, 84 of whom were HER2-low and 117 of whom were HER2-zero, were evaluated. The median BMFS in the entire cohort was 35.6 months (95% CI 29.8-41.4). Although HER2-low patients had numerically longer median BMFS than HER2-zero patients (43.7 m vs. 30.1 m, p = 0.025), multivariate analysis revealed that the difference was not significant (p = 0.167). BMFS between the HER2-low and HER2-zero groups was similar in the hormone receptor (HR)-positive (52.8 m vs. 47.6 m, p = 0.276) and HR-negative (15.3 m vs. 19.7 m, p = 0.930) cohorts. The median SABM in the entire cohort was 6.0 months (95% CI 3.8-8.1). HER2-low and HER2-zero patients had similar median SAMB (5.4 m vs. 6.1 m, p = 0.816). The SABM between the HER2-low and HER2-zero groups was similar in the HR-positive (6.3 m vs. 8.7 m, p = 0.375) and HR-negative (3.3 m vs. 4.2 m, p = 0.783) cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Low HER2 expression does not affect BMFS or SAMB in brain metastatic breast cancer patients in this real-world population.

Differences in HER2-0 and HER2-low Breast Cancer: Androgen Receptor and Programmed Death Ligand 1 as Predictive Factors

PURPOSE

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer has the potential to emerge as a distinct subtype. Several studies have compared the differences between HER2-low and HER2-0 breast cancers, but no consensus has been reached. Additionally, a biomarker to predict pathological complete response (pCR) rates in patients with HER2-low breast cancer remains to be identified.

METHODS

We collected data from 777 patients across three centers, stratifying them into HER2-low and HER2-0 groups. We compared differences in survival and pCR rates between the two groups and investigated potential biomarkers that could reliably predict pCR.

RESULTS

The study found that patients with HER2-0 breast cancer had higher pCR rates compared to patients with HER2-low tumors (289 patients [30.1%] vs. 475 patients [18.1%], p < 0.0001). Survival analysis showed no significant advantage for HER2-low tumors over HER2-0 breast cancers. Binary logistic analysis revealed that androgen receptor (AR) expression predicts poorer pCR rates in both the overall patient group and the HER2-0 breast cancer group (overall patients: odds ratio [OR], 0.479; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.250-0.917; p = 0.026 and HER2-0 patients: OR, 0.267; 95% CI, 0.080-0.892; p = 0.032). In contrast, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was associated with more favorable pCR rates in the overall patient group (OR, 3.199; 95% CI, 1.020-10.037; p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

There is currently insufficient evidence to classify HER2-low breast cancer as a distinct subtype. Our study revealed that AR expression, along with negative PD-L1 expression, contributes to lower pCR rates.

ER + HER2- early-stage breast cancer: association of HER2 expression, tumor characteristics, and outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between the HER2 score as provided by the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) assay, tumor characteristics, and outcomes in early-stage, ER + HER2-negative breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

All women insured by the Clalit Health Services, with early-stage, ER + HER2-negative BC who underwent RS testing between 2008 and 2011 were included. Patient/tumor characteristics and Kaplan-Meier estimates for distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared by HER2 category, based on the HER2 score provided by the RS assay: lower HER2 score group representing the lower third of the HER2 score range (≤ 8.5); higher HER2 score group representing the upper 2 thirds of the HER2 score range (8.6-10.7).

RESULTS

1535 patients were included (948 node negative, 587 node positive); 330 (21.5%) were categorized as lower HER2 score and 1205 (78.5%) as higher HER2 score. Compared to the higher HER2 score group, the lower score group included a significantly higher proportion of patients with RS ≥ 26 in both node-negative (41% vs. 13.6%, P < .001) and node-positive diseases (36% vs. 19.4%, P < .001). Compared to the higher HER2 score group, the lower score group had significantly lower Oncotype ER and PR scores and lower proportion of lobular disease. Age and tumor size were comparable between the HER2 score groups. Within each RS category, DRFS and OS were not associated with the HER2 score.

CONCLUSION

Lower HER2 score was associated with higher RS results. Further study is desired to elucidate the role and significance of HER2 expression in early-stage, ER + HER2-negative.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of breast cancer with low HER2 status evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization

Although trastuzumab deruxtecan improves the prognosis of patients with HER2-low breast cancer, the characteristics and prognostic value of low HER2 status remains to be elucidated. A prospective database of patients with clinical stage I to III breast cancer who underwent surgery between September 2012 and October 2022 at Teikyo University Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) were analyzed. HER2 was evaluated using fluorescence in situ hybridization assay, and HER2-low and HER2-negative was defined as HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥1.0, and <1.0, respectively. The median age and Ki67 score of the 1,024 patients were 56.0 years (range, 23.0-93.0 years) and 15.0% (range, 0.5-99.0%), respectively. Overall, 908 (88.7%) patients were hormone receptor positive. Among all patients, 902 (88.1%) had HER2-low tumors and 122 (11.9%) had HER2-negative tumors. Positive rates for estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) were significantly higher in HER2-low compared with HER2-negative patients [ER: 804 (89.1%) patients vs. 99 (81.1%) patients, P=0.021; PgR: 723 (80.1%) patients vs. 86 (70.5%) patients, P=0.023]. The median Ki67 score was significantly lower in HER2-low compared with HER2-negative patients (14.5 vs. 18.5%; P=0.013). With a median follow-up time of 46.2 months, the overall survival (OS) was significantly improved in HER2-low compared with HER2-negative patients (97.4 vs. 96.7%; P=0.029). Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that HER2-low status was not an independent factor for OS. The findings of the present study suggest that HER2-low status may not have a significant association with prognosis, despite a significant association between Ki67 and hormone receptor expression.

Clinical and Molecular Characteristics of High-Risk, Recurrent, or Metastatic Endometrial Cancer That Is Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low

PURPOSE

Recent success of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted antibody-drug-conjugate trastuzumab-deruxtecan in HER2-low and HER2-positive tumors has sparked interest in examining the HER2 status of tumors not traditionally associated with HER2 amplification. Despite the increasing number of systemic treatment options, patients with advanced endometrial cancer (EC) still face a poor prognosis. This study evaluates HER2-low status in over 800 EC, correlating HER2 with both molecular and clinical features.

METHODS

HER2 status was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and dual in situ hybridization (DISH) on four studies of previously classified high-risk EC (PORTEC-3 and Medical Spectrum Twente cohort), recurrent or metastatic EC (DOMEC), and a primary stage IV cohort. EC was classified as HER2-negative (IHC 0), HER2-low (IHC 1+/2+ without amplification), or HER2-positive (IHC 3+ or DISH-confirmed amplification). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models assessed the independence of any prognostic impact of HER2 status.

RESULTS

HER2 status was determined in 806 EC: 74.8% were HER2-negative, 17.2% HER2-low, and 7.9% HER2-positive. HER2-low was found across all molecular classes and histotypes. The highest rates of HER2-low and HER2-positive tumors were in recurrent or metastatic EC (35.6% and 15.6%), followed by primary stage IV EC (29.9% and 12.4%) and high-risk EC (14.2% and 6.8%). HER2 status had no independent prognostic value.

CONCLUSION

A quarter of high-risk, metastatic, or recurrent EC exhibited HER2 overexpression. The presence of HER2 overexpression in all clinical and molecular categories highlights the need for broad testing and offers treatment options for a wide range of patients.

Clinicopathological characteristics and long-term prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer patients with HER2-Low expression: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study

PURPOSE

The objective of the current research was to assess the clinicopathological characteristics and long-term prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low status following breast surgery.

METHODS

A total of 202 TNBC patients treated at Qingdao Central Hospital from January 2010 to December 2019 were included, comprising 71 HER2-low and 131 HER2-zero patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to minimize differences between the cohorts.

RESULTS

HER2-low TNBC patients had lower histological grade, lower Ki-67 expression levels, and a higher prevalence of hypertension compared to HER2-zero TNBC patients. Before and after PSM, the HER2-low group consistently exhibited a lower recurrence rate and longer RFS compared to HER2-zero TNBC patients. HER2-low status was validated as an independent low-risk factor for RFS both pre-PSM (HR 0.354, 95% CI 0.178-0.706, p = 0.003) and post-PSM (HR 0.405, 95% CI 0.185-0.886, p = 0.024). No statistically significant differences in mortality rate and OS were observed, both before and after PSM.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-low and HER2-zero TNBC patients show significant clinicopathological differences. Compared to HER2-zero, HER2-low status is linked to better long-term prognosis and serves as an independent low-risk factor for RFS in TNBC patients.

HER2-low prevalence among Hispanic/Latino women with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

HER2-low has garnered significant attention for the treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer. We aimed to determine the prevalence of HER2-low expression in Hispanic/Latino women with breast cancer (BC).

METHODS

We searched in Embase, LILACS, and Medline databases for articles reporting the expression of HER2 immunohistochemistry with scores reported as 0, 1+, 2+, or 3+, with equivocal cases (2+) confirmed through in situ hybridization (ISH).

RESULTS

A total of 12 articles were finally included, comprising 73,467 individuals. The prevalence of HER2-zero, HER2-low and HER2 positive cases among all BC (0, 1+, 2+/ISH-, 2+/ISH+ and 3+), was 45.0%, 32.0%, and 23.0%, respectively. The prevalence of HER2-zero and HER2-low expression among negative cases (0, 1+ and 2+/ISH-), was 53.0% and 47.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There is an important percentage of Hispanic/Latino individuals who would benefit from HER2-targeted therapies, even in HER2 negative cases. Additional research on the prevalence of HER2-low tumors across a wider range of Latin American countries is required to better understand the molecular epidemiology of this biomarker within the Hispanic/Latino population.

Impact of immunohistochemistry staining conditions on the incidence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer

We investigated frequencies of HER2-low breast cancer (BC) (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification) before and after IHC conditions were modified in order to understand the impact of IHC staining conditions on frequencies of HER2-low BC. Primary BC cases diagnosed at the Yeungnam University Hospital (YUH, n = 728) or Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital (KUDH, n = 290) in 2022 were reviewed, and data on HER2 status and IHC conditions were collected (cohort 1). Both institutions used the 4B5 antibody for HER2 IHC but had different staining protocols. After modifications of the IHC conditions at both institutions, primary BC cases (YUH, n = 324 and KUDH, n = 135) diagnosed from April to July 2023 (cohort 2) were reviewed to assess any changes in the frequency of HER2 status. In cohort 1, of the 728 cases diagnosed at YUH, 556 (76.4%) were HER2-zero, 76 (10.4%) were HER2-low, and 96 (13.2%) were HER2-positive, and of the 290 cases diagnosed at KUDH, 135 (46.6%) were HER2-zero, 82 (28.3%) were HER2-low, and 73 (25.2%) were HER2-positive. Modifications in HER2 IHC staining conditions dramatically increased the frequencies of HER2-low BC in cohort 2 (YUH 38.9% and KUDH 49.6%), but they did not result in significant changes in the HER2-positive rates (YUH 15.4% and KUDH 25.2%) compared to cohort 1. In conclusion, minor modifications in HER2 IHC staining conditions significantly affected the frequency of HER2-low BC but had little impact on the HER2-positivity rate. Each pathology laboratory should verify IHC conditions using control slides (including 1+) to enable the accurate identification of HER2-low BC.

Analysis of factors influencing the efficacy of NAC and prognosis between HER2-zero and HER2-low HR negative breast cancer

Objective: The aim of this paper was to assess the differences in clinicopathological characteristics, efficacy and prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in human epidermal growth factor receptor2(HER2)-zero and HER2-low hormone receptor (HR)-negative breast cancer (BC) patients, and the impact of HER2-evolution on prognosis before and after NAC. Methods: 319 triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients who completed NAC and surgery from August 2014 to August 2018 at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were included. Clinicopathological features, efficacy of NAC and assessment of prognosis were retrospectively analysed. The evolution of HER2-zero to HER2-low after NAC is defined as HER2-gain, the evolution of HER2-low to HER2-zero after NAC is defined as HER2-loss, and HER2 unchanged after NAC is defined as HER2-stable. Results: In HR-negative BC, the pathological complete response (pCR) rate was significantly higher in HER2-zero compared with HER2-low patients, and the difference was statistically significant (38.9% vs 23.2%, p = 0.004), but there was no significant difference in the prognosis between the two groups. The overall rate of HER2-evolution after NAC was 19.7%, and there was a significant correlation between HER2-loss and histological grading, whereas HER2-gain was significantly associated with Ki-67 expression. In terms of prognosis, HER2-gain was better compared to the other two groups. Conclusion: In this study, we found that HER2-low HR-negative BC showed different clinicopathological features and response to NAC compared with HER2-zero, as well as HER2-evolution before and after NAC had a significant impact on prognosis.

Clinicopathological characteristics, evolution, and treatment outcomes of hormone receptor-negative/HER2-low metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from three prospective clinical trials

Objective

With the approval of trastuzumab deruxtecan for the treatment of unresectable/metastatic HER2-low breast cancer, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low has emerged as a clinically actionable biomarker. There is an urgent need for a deeper understanding of HER2-low breast cancer patients. Therefore, this study was conducted to explore the clinicopathological characteristics, the evolution of HER2-low status, and its impact on the prognosis of hormone receptor (HoR)-negative/HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients.

Methods

This pooled analysis included 350 metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) patients who received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from November 2007 to July 2022. Patients were categorized into HER2-0 and HER2-low groups based on their HER2 status. Baseline clinicopathological characteristics, evolution of HER2 status between primary and metastatic lesions, and treatment efficacy were compared between the two groups.

Results

Among the 350 mTNBC patients, 34.9% (122/350) were HER2-low and 65.1% (228/350) were HER2-0. Significant differences were observed between HER2-low and HER2-0 patients in terms of age and menopausal status. HER2-low patients were older (54 vs. 49 years, p=0.002) and had a lower proportion of premenopausal patients (32.8% vs. 52.6%, p<0.001) compared to HER2-0 patients. No significant differences were observed in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between HER2-low and HER2-0 patients receiving first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (mPFS: 7.43 vs. 8.30 months, p=0.389, HR=1.11, 95% CI 0.88-1.40; mOS: 25.37 vs. 26.63 months, p=0.907, HR=1.02, 95% CI 0.76-1.37). Additionally, 32.3% (41/127) of patients exhibited discordant HER2 status between primary and metastatic lesions, primarily evolving from HER2-0 to HER2-low. Notably, patients with discordant HER2 status had significantly longer PFS compared to those with concordant status (mPFS: 11.07 vs. 7.53 months, p=0.020). The Cox multivariate analysis showed that HER2 status consistency (p=0.026) was an independent predictor of PFS.

Conclusion

In mTNBC patients, those with HER2-low status had similar responses to platinum-based chemotherapy as HER2-0 patients. There was significant discordance in HER2 status between primary and metastatic lesions. Patients with discordant HER2 status had better responses to platinum-based chemotherapy. Therefore, for patients with HER2-0 primary lesions, re-evaluation of HER2 status in metastatic lesions through biopsy may offer new treatment opportunities.

The efficacy of trastuzumab-deruxtecan for the treatment of patients with advanced HER2-low breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Until recently, the available human receptor epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) targeted agents were ineffective for treating patients with HER2-low expressing breast cancer (defined as immunohistochemical expression of 1+ or 2+ without amplification). The development of novel and potent HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugates, affective at treating HER2-low expressing breast cancers, have changed the way we think about HER2-low expression and expanded the treatment options for many patients with advanced disease.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we summarize the current management of HER2-low breast cancer and commonly encountered challenges such as treatment sequencing and toxicity management.

EXPERT OPINION

trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a treatment option for patients with advanced, HER2-low breast cancer, irrespective of the hormone receptor status. The current optimal place in treatment algorithms is after the first line of chemotherapy, both in HR-positive and triple-negative breast cancer; however, other agents are available in this setting and risks and benefits for each should be considered in shared decision making. Up to 10-15% of patients receiving T-DXd develop interstitial lung disease. Patient and clinician education are key to safely implement T-DXd in clinical practice.

Factors Affecting Non-sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Objective Breast cancer most commonly metastasizes to axillary lymph nodes via lymphatic drainage. Today, axillary lymph node surgery is at least as important as primary breast surgery. In today's breast surgery, supported by chemotherapy and radiotherapy, current approaches are taken to avoid axillary dissection in appropriate patient groups. In our study, we aimed to evaluate and predict the factors affecting non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients with early-stage clinically node-negative breast cancer. Materials and methods Data of 65 female patients were analysed retrospectively. Patient's age, preoperative haemoglobin values, tumour localisation, tumour diameter, number of sentinel lymph nodes sent for frozen examination, and tumour pathological features were investigated in terms of the number of non-sentinel lymph nodes and metastatic lymph nodes removed by axillary dissection, and whether it affects non-sentinel lymph node metastasis was investigated by statistical analysis. Results In the axillary dissection of patients with positive sentinel lymph node metastasis, the number of metastatic non-sentinel lymph nodes was statistically significantly higher in Cerb-B2-positive patients than in Cerb-B2-negative patients (p=0.046). As the stage progressed, the number of metastatic non-sentinel lymph nodes increased as expected (p<0.001). Conclusion In the current axillary surgery, it is a new approach to avoid axillary dissection in appropriate patient groups even if the sentinel lymph node is positive. When planning the surgical treatment of these patients, it should be considered preoperatively that Cerb-B2-positive patients are more prone to axillary non-sentinel lymph node metastasis.

Clinical outcomes of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to HER2-low status☆

BACKGROUND

The impact of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on outcomes in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC) is unclear. Using a large, multi-institutional cohort, we evaluated outcomes by HER2 IHC status in patients with eTNBC who received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage I-III TNBC who received NAT and underwent surgery from January 2016 to June 2019 were identified from three databases. HER2 expression was defined as low (IHC1+ or 2+/FISH not amplified) or HER2 IHC score 0 by local testing at diagnosis. Pathological complete response (pCR) rates were compared using logistic regression adjusted for multiple factors. Survival outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Among 977 consecutive patients, 388 (39.7%) had HER2-low and 589 (60.3%) had HER2 IHC score 0 tumors. Median age at eTNBC diagnosis was 50.3 years (range 21.0-83.4 years). At baseline, clinical nodal positivity rate was significantly higher in HER2-low (55.0%) versus HER2 IHC score 0 tumors (46.6%) (P = 0.011); pCR rates were similar (32.0% versus 32.6%; adjusted P = 0.924). At a median follow-up of 3.5 years, recurrence-free survival (RFS) did not vary significantly between HER2-low versus HER2 IHC score 0 among patients with pCR (adjusted P = 0.368) or residual disease (RD) after NAT (adjusted P = 0.573). Distant RFS and overall survival (OS) did not differ by HER2 category for patients with pCR [distant RFS (DRFS), adjusted P = 0.509; OS, adjusted P = 0.514] or RD (DRFS, adjusted P = 0.812; OS, P = 0.285). Discordance of tumor HER2 status was seen in 31.1% of HER2 IHC score 0 cases, with HER2 expression observed post-treatment; 34.8% of HER2-low cases showed discordance, with absent HER2 expression in RD.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort of patients with eTNBC treated with NAT, HER2-low status was not associated with pCR or survival after adjusting for clinical factors. The discordance in HER2 IHC pre- and post-NAT likely reflects challenges in HER2 quantification and heterogeneity.

The impact of HER2-low status on pathological complete response and disease-free survival in early-stage breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The HER-2 status of breast cancer (BC) has been classified as negative or positive for a long time. Given the efficacy of novel anti-HER2-targeted antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in HER2-low BC, a distinct subgroup of HER2-low tumors has emerged within BC. The biology and prognostic impact of HER2-low expression are not yet well defined, and inconsistent results were reported. This study aims to evaluate the impact of low HER-2 status on the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and disease- free survival (DFS) rates.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed BC patients treated with NACT from 2017 to 2023 in two cancer centers. HER2-negative patients were included. HER-2 low status was defined by IHC + 1 or + 2/ISH non-amplified, and HER2-zero was defined by IHC 0. Pathological complete response (pCR) rates and DFS between HER2-low and HER2-zero populations were compared.

RESULTS

170 patients were identified. 122 (72%) of these patients were HER2- zero BC, whereas 48 (28%) were HER2-low BC. Overall, pCR was achieved in 35 (20.5%) patients. Of these, pCR was observed in 30 patients (44.6%) from the HER2- zero group, compared to 5 patients (10.4%) from the HER2-low group (p = 0.046), but significance was lost in multivariate analysis. Among the hormone receptor (HR) positive subtype, pCR was achieved 19.8% of HER2-zero tumors and 7.5% of HER2-low tumors (p = 0.08). For HR-negative subtype 34.1% HER2-zero tumors had pCR and 25% of the HER2-low tumors had pCR (p = 0.614). There was no association between DFS and HER2-low status.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that HER2-low status had no impact on pCR or DFS.

HER2-low non-metastatic breast cancer in Qatar-a nationwide retrospective cohort study to evaluate the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a real-world analysis

Globally, breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer and one of the leading causes of cancer-related death among women. HER2-low breast cancer represents a recently identified molecular category within breast cancer characterized by tumors displaying only slight overexpression of HER2 or lacking gene amplification. To illustrate, HER2-low tumors typically have an IHC (immune histochemistry) score of 1+ or 2+ with negative amplification. Nonetheless, recent findings indicate that even a slight amplification of HER2 could notably influence both therapeutic responses and prognostic outcomes. Our study aims to unveil the impact of HER2-low expression on the response to anthracycline and taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in comparison to the HER2-negative group in non-metastatic breast cancer. This is a retrospective cohort study. All patients' profiles with non-metastatic, HER2-low, and HER2-negative breast cancers who were administered neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and had surgery performed within the period spanning from 1 January 2018 to 30 August 2022 were enrolled. HER2-positive breast cancer patients were excluded. The evaluation of patients' responses was conducted through the examination of surgical pathology reports to compare the two study groups (HER2-low and HER2-negative). The primary objective was evaluating the response to NACT comparing the objective response rate (ORR) in each of the two groups of HER2-low and HER2-negative patients. The total number of patients included was 262 patients; the majority were HER2-low 89% (233/262) vs. 11% (29/262) HER2-negative. An ORR (complete and partial response) to NACT was shown in 71% (185/262) of all patients. The ORR was similar in both groups, 70% (164/233) in the HER2-low group vs. 73% (21/29) in the HER2-negative group, with a statistical difference, OR: 1 (95% CI: 0.8-1), p-value 0.8. Similarly, the pathological complete response (pCR) rate was the same in both study groups at 14%, OR: 0.7 (95% CI: 0.2-3), p-value: 0.6. Interestingly, patients with hormone-positive tumors across both study groups had a higher response rate compared to hormone-negative patients. In the HER2-low cohort, the ORR was higher in patients with hormone-positive tumors in comparison with those with hormone-negative tumors [73% vs. 27%, OR: 0.8 (95% CI:0.8-1), p-value: 0.001]. Comparatively, in the HER2-negative cohort, ORR was also higher in patients with hormone-positive tumors compared to hormone-negative tumors [52% vs. 48%, OR: 2 (95% CI: 1-5), p-value: 0.05]. Subsequently, the ORR of all hormone-positive tumors with a positive outcome (CR or PR) was assessed categorizing the patients based on their HER2 expression. Concerning patients who expressed partial response (N = 115), a statistically significant difference was observed in HER2- low hormone-positive tumors as opposed to HER2-negative hormone-positive tumors [90% vs. 10%, OR: 0.7 (95% CI: 0.5-0.9), p-value: 0.001]. Remarkably, all patients with complete responses were from the HER2-low cohort. Our findings demonstrated a significant influence of HER2-low expression on the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among patients with hormone-positive HER2-low breast cancer within the studied cohort. Further studies are needed to evaluate the influence of hormonal expression on the response rate to NACT in the HER2-low patients in our population.

Comparison of the Pathological Complete Response Rate and Survival Between HER2-Low and HER2-Zero Breast Cancer in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Although HER2-low breast cancer (BC) constitutes almost 50% of all BC types, its impact on the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and survival in early BC is uncertain. As a result, a systematic review was conducted to compare the pCR rate and survival of HER2-low and HER2-zero BC in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) setting. Two reviewers independently performed literature searches using EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Libraries internet databases up to June 2023. Finally, 29 studies with 178,294 patients were included. HER2-low BC had a considerably lower pCR rate compared to HER2-zero BC in the entire population (Risk Ratio [RR] = 0.68, P < .001) and in the hormone receptor (HR)-positive subgroup (RR = 0.73, P = .009), but not in the HR-negative subgroup (RR = 0.99, P = .755). Furthermore, patients with HER2-low BC exhibited prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those with HER2-zero BC, observed in both the entire cohort (DFS: P = .004; OS: P = .008) and the HR-negative subgroup (DFS: P = .009; OS: P < .001). In the HR-positive population, OS was superior in HER2-low BC patients (P < .001), whereas no significant differences in DFS were observed (P = .064). Our findings imply that the pCR rate and prognosis of HER2-low BC are distinguished from those of HER2-zero BC in early BC treated with NACT, which contributes to a better knowledge of the BC subgroup.

Landscape of HER2-low breast cancer: Insights from a six-year study on prevalence and clinicopathological characteristics

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer has emerged as a subtype of breast cancer, defined by HER2 1+/2+ in immunohistochemistry (IHC) and absence of ERBB2 gene amplification on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Recent trials showed marked response of HER2-low breast cancer to novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug-conjugates. Data on characteristics of HER2-low breast cancer subtype is limited. Real-world data from the Anatomic Pathology Department of Hotel-Dieu de France, spanning 2017-2023, was retrospectively collected. HER2-positive patients were excluded to compare HER2-low to HER2-zero breast cancer subtypes. Clinicopathological characteristics between the groups were compared using a Chi-Squared test. Out of 1195 patients, we observed 341 (28.5 %) HER2-low breast cancers cases. HER2-positive breast cancer cases (n = 178; 14.9 %) were excluded. There was no significant difference in age and sex between HER2-low and HER2-zero group (p = 0.33 and 0.79, respectively). HER2-low breast cancer was associated with positive estrogen receptor status and positive progesterone receptor status (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively). Ductal adenocarcinomas were more commonly observed in HER2-low group (p < 0.001). When stratified by hormone (HR) status, 87.4 % of patients had HR-positive status and 12.6 % were HR-negative. Among the HR-negative group, HER2-low tumors tended to show lower proliferation index compared to HER2-zero tumors (25%vs.10 %, p = 0.04). This study showed that HER2-low is distinct from HER2-zero and is common among patients with breast cancer. Clinicopathological features such as histological type differ between HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer. Within HR-negative breast cancer, those with low HER2 expression exhibit a less aggressive profile compared to HER2-zero tumors.

A Nationwide Study on HER2-Low Breast Cancer in South Korea: Its Incidence of 2022 Real World Data and the Importance of Immunohistochemical Staining Protocols

PURPOSE

Notable effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low advanced breast cancer (BC) has focused pathologists' attention. We studied the incidence and clinicopathologic characteristics of HER2-low BC, and the effects of immunohistochemistry (IHC) associated factors on HER2 IHC results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Breast Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists conducted a nationwide study using real-world data on HER2 status generated between January 2022 and December 2022. Information on HER2 IHC protocols at each participating institution was also collected.

RESULTS

Total 11,416 patients from 25 institutions included in this study. Of these patients, 40.7% (range, 6.0% to 76.3%) were classified as HER2-zero, 41.7% (range, 10.5% to 69.1%) as HER2-low, and 17.5% (range, 6.7% to 34.0%) as HER2-positive. HER2-low tumors were associated with positive estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor statuses (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Antigen retrieval times (≥ 36 minutes vs. < 36 minutes) and antibody incubation times (≥ 12 minutes vs. < 12 minutes) affected on the frequency of HER2 IHC 1+ BC at institutions using the PATHWAY HER2 (4B5) IHC assay and BenchMark XT or Ultra staining instruments. Furthermore, discordant results between core needle biopsy and subsequent resection specimen HER2 statuses were observed in 24.1% (787/3,259) of the patients.

CONCLUSION

The overall incidence of HER2-low BC in South Korea concurs with those reported in previously published studies. Significant inter-institutional differences in HER2 IHC protocols were observed, and it may have impact on HER2-low status. Thus, we recommend standardizing HER2 IHC conditions to ensure precise patient selection for targeted therapy.

Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics, efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy, and prognosis in HER2-low and HER2-ultralow breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aims to analyze potential differences in clinicopathology, efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), and clinical outcome among HER2-null, HER2-ultralow and HER2-low breast cancers.

METHODS

Consecutive cases of HER2-negative breast cancer that received NAT were included. They were classified as HER2-null (no staining), HER2-ultralow (incomplete faint staining in ≤ 10% of tumour cells) and HER2-low (HER2-1 + or HER2-2+, in situ hybridisation negative). Subgroup analysis was performed based on the HER2 expression level.

RESULTS

Out of 302 patients, 215 (71.19%) were HER2-low, 59 (19.54%) were HER2-ultralow, and 28 (9.27%) were HER2-null. In comparison to the HER2-ultralow group, the HER2-low group exhibited higher expression frequencies of ER (p < 0.001), PR (p < 0.001), and AR (p = 0.004), along with a greater prevalence of the luminal subtype (p < 0.001). The HER2-ultralow group also demonstrated a higher prevalence of lymph node metastasis compared to the HER2-null group (p = 0.026). Varied rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) were observed among the three subgroups: HER2-null, HER2-ultralow, and HER2-low, with rates of 35.71%, 22.03%, and 12.56%, respectively. Only the HER2-low subgroup exhibited a significant difference compared to HER2-null (p = 0.001). Despite variations in pCR rates, the three subgroups exhibited comparable disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.571). Importantly, we found HER2-low patients with better treatment response (RCB-0/I) exhibited significantly better DFS than those with significant residual disease (RCB-II/III) (P = 0.036). The overall rate of HER2 immunohistochemical score discordance was 45.24%, mostly driven by the conversion between HER2-0 and HER2-low phenotype. Notably, 32.19% of cases initially classified as HER2-0 phenotype on baseline biopsy were later reclassified as HER2-low after neoadjuvant therapy, and it is noteworthy that 22 out of these cases (78.57%) originally had an HER2-ultralow status in the pretreatment biopsy sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate the distinct clinicopathological features of HER2-low and HER2-ultralow breast tumors and confirm that RCB is an effective predictor of prognosis in HER2-low populations for the first time. Notably, our findings demonstrate high instability in both HER2-low and HER2-ultralow expression from the primary baseline biopsy to residual disease after NAT. Furthermore, this study is the first to investigate the clinicopathological feature and the effectiveness of NAT for HER2-ultralow breast cancer.

Efficacy and prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2 low-expressing breast cancer: a retrospective single-center study

Purpose

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is vital for breast cancer prognosis. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinicopathological data of HER2-negative breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the associated factors affecting the pathological complete response rate (pCR) and prognosis.

Methods

Clinical data of 173 patients with primary HER2-negative breast cancer, who initially received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical treatment at the Breast Surgery Department of Bethune Hospital in Shanxi Province from January 2012 to December 2022, were collected.

Results

Compared to HER2-0 patients, HER2-low patients had higher T staging (p = 0.008), higher Ki67 proliferation index (p < 0.001), lower N staging (p = 0.001), and lower pCR rate (p < 0.001). Univariate analysis revealed that T stage, TNM stage, HR status, HER2 status, and Ki67 are risk factors that affect the pCR rate in HER-2 negative. Multivariate analysis identified HR status as an independent predictor of pCR rate. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that menstrual status, N staging, T staging, TNM staging, and pCR status affected the prognosis of HER2-low breast cancer patients (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

HER2-low breast cancer exhibits distinct biological behaviors, suggesting personalized treatment approaches.

Incidence and Prognostic Values in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Low Expression Metastatic Breast Cancer in Southeast Asian Population: A 10-Year Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

Breast cancer progression varies across molecular subtypes, and treatment options for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low expression tumors are limited compared with those of HER2 overexpression tumors. Comprehensive information regarding the epidemiology and clinical outcomes of metastatic HER2-low expression breast cancer in a Southeast Asian population is lacking.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was performed to analyze data from patients with de novo advanced breast cancer, including HER2 expression, tumor stage, and metastatic pattern. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests and survival analyses, were used to compare HER2-low expression and HER2-negative groups.

RESULTS

Of the 491 patients, 21.2% had HER2-low expression, 30% had HER2 overexpression, and 50% had HER2-negative expression. Among the hormone receptor (HR)-positive patients, 34% had HER2-low expression; in the triple-negative patients, the HER2-low incidence was 20.6%. No significant differences in clinical characteristics between HER2-low and HER2-negative groups were observed, except for more HR-positive patients in the HER2-low group. HER2-low patients had a longer overall survival (OS) than HER2-negative patients (43 v 23 months; hazard ratio, 0.7; P < .001), especially in HR-positive patients. After adjusting for HR status, HER2-low patients maintained improved outcomes. HR-positive HER2-low patients showed nonsignificant OS gains compared with HR-positive HER2-negative patients, regardless of first-line chemotherapy or endocrine therapy.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed the incidence and clinical outcomes of HER2-low expression in de novo advanced breast cancer, suggesting favorable outcomes, particularly in HR-positive breast cancer. These findings may inform personalized treatment strategies. Further research into the mechanisms and implications of HER2-low expression in breast cancer is required.

Pyrotinib and Trastuzumab Plus Chemotherapy Serve as an Acceptable Neoadjuvant Regimen Exhibiting Good Efficacy and Tolerance in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients

Objective: Pyrotinib, a new irreversible dual pan-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor blocking EGFR and HER2, has achieved a promising efficacy for advanced HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. This study intended to further investigate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pyrotinib and trastuzumab plus chemotherapy for HER2+ breast cancer treatment. Methods: Thirty-eight HER2+ breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant pyrotinib and trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (docetaxel and carboplatin) were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), pathological complete response (pCR), and adverse events data was retrieved. Results: According to the RECIST, the complete response rate was 0.0%, 10.5%, and 15.8% after second-cycle, fourth-cycle, and sixth-cycle therapy, respectively; whereas the objective response rate was 76.3%, 92.1%, and 100.0%, accordingly. The total pCR (tpCR) rate was 52.6%, the pCR rate of the breast was also 52.6%, and the pCR rate of lymph nodes was 86.8%. The tpCR rate was lower in patients with HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC)++ and amplification by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) than in those with HER2 IHC+++ (14.3% vs. 61.3%, p = 0.024), which was also lower in patients with Ki-67 expression ≥30% than in those with Ki-67 expression <30% (40.0% vs. 76.9%, p = 0.031). The common adverse events included diarrhea (84.2%), anemia (73.7%), nausea and vomiting (63.2%), fatigue (50.0%), hypomagnesemia (44.7%), leukopenia (42.1%), thrombocytopenia (39.5%), elevated transaminase (36.8%), and pruritus (31.6%). Conclusions: Pyrotinib and trastuzumab plus chemotherapy serve as an acceptable neoadjuvant regimen exhibiting good efficacy and tolerance in HER2+ breast cancer patients, while further large-scale validation is warranted.

The Prognostic Impact of HER2-Low and Menopausal Status in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

TNBC is noted for its aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Recently developed HER2 target agents have shown potential benefit even in HER2-low expressing breast cancers. This study retrospectively analyzed 2542 non-metastatic TNBC patients from 2008 to 2020, revealing that 26.0% were HER2-low. Data on demographics, tumor characteristics, pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed. The HER2-low group, compared to the HER2-0 group, showed significantly better DFS, DMFS, OS, BCSS (p = 0.0072, p = 0.0096, p = 0.0180, and p = 0.0001, respectively) with older age and higher rates of postmenopausal status (p < 0.0001). No significant differences in pCR rates were observed. Multivariate analyses identified HER2 status as a significant prognostic factor for DFS (p = 0.048), DMFS (p = 0.018), OS (p = 0.049), and BCSS (p = 0.008). Subgroup analysis revealed that these effects varied with menopausal status, showing more pronounced benefits in postmenopausal women. Our findings suggest that HER2-low TNBC patients exhibit a distinct clinical profile and improved survival compared to HER2-0 TNBC patients, especially in postmenopausal patients. Further research on estrogen and HER2 interaction is needed.

Impact of HER2 status on clinicopathological characteristics and pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer

PURPOSE

HER2-low triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounted for up to 34%-39% of primary TNBC and 22.2%-32% of metastatic TNBC. Our study aims to explore the relationship between HER2 expression and clinicopathological characteristics, analyze the impact of HER2 expression on the pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in TNBC.

METHODS

This study involved 191 patients with TNBC who underwent operation after NAC from October 2021 to August 2022. Clinicopathological characteristics and the frequency of pCR were compared between HER2-low and HER2-0 TNBC.

RESULTS

42.2% (81/191) patients in our cohort were HER2-low. They exhibited differences in menopausal status, body mass index (BMI), androgen receptor (AR) expression, and histological grade (P < 0.05). Particularly, in HER2-low TNBC, AR was associated with tumor size, lymph node metastase, histological grade, and the incidence of multifocal disease (P < 0.05). The total pCR rate of entire cohor was 39.8%. Tumor size (P = 0.025), AR status (P = 0.033) and histological grade (P = 0.007) were significantly associated with the pCR rate of them, while the HER2 status did not exert a similar association. The multivariate analysis revealed that BMI (P = 0.004) and histological grade (P < 0.001) were associated with pCR of HER2-low TNBC, while tumor size (P = 0.034) and AR (P = 0.034) were associated with pCR of HER2-0 TNBC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, HER2-low TNBC patients exhibits specific clinical characteristics and response features to NAC.

HER2-Low Breast Cancer: Now and in the Future

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and its subtypes are characterized by hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression status. "HER2-low" tumors, which exhibit a low level of HER2 expression (immunohistochemistry 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification), were conventionally considered not amenable to anti-HER2 targeting agents based on the results of a phase III trial of trastuzumab. However, this perspective is being challenged by the emergence of novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates, such as trastuzumab-deruxtecan. These innovative therapies have demonstrated remarkable efficacy against HER2-low breast cancer, shedding new light on a previously overlooked category of breast cancer. Such promising results highlight the need for in-depth investigations of the biology and prognostic implications of HER2-low tumors. In this review, we comprehensively summarize the current evidence surrounding this topic and highlight areas that warrant further exploration and research in the future.

Real-World Data on Pathological Response and Survival Outcomes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-Low Breast Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Data on the pathological responses and survival outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-low breast cancer (BC) are lacking. This study aims to investigate this topic in the real world.

METHODS

Clinicopathological data from 819 HER2-negative BC patients who underwent NACT between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively retrieved from the Shanghai Jiaotong University Breast Cancer Database. These patients were categorized into HER2-low and HER2-0 groups. Logistic analyses were conducted to identify predictors of complete pathological response (pCR) and breast pCR. Cox regression analyses were conducted to assess the factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves were generated to compare DFS and OS between HER2-low BC and HER2-0 BC.

RESULTS

Of the 819 BC patients, 669 (81.7%) had HER2-low tumors, and 150 (18.3%) had HER2-0 tumors. HER2-low BC had a significantly higher ratio of ER ≥ 10%, PR ≥ 20%, and Ki67 ≥ 15% than HER2-0 BC. A significantly higher breast pCR rate was observed in HER2-low BC than in HER2-0 BC (13.6% and 7.3%, respectively, P = .036). Age, HER2 status (low or 0), Ki67, and surgery options were associated with breast pCR in HER2-negative BC. In HER2-low BC, the pCR rate of ER ≥ 10% BC was significantly lower than that of ER < 10% BC, but the DFS and OS of ER 10% BC were significantly higher. The K-M curve showed no significant differences in DFS or OS between HER2-low and HER2-0 BC. Cox regression revealed that ER expression and histological grade (III vs. I∼II) were significantly associated with survival in HER2-low BC.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world data (RWD) study, a significantly higher breast pCR rate was found in HER2-low BC than in HER2-0 BC, although there was no significant difference in survival. Moreover, ER expression had a significant prognostic impact on HER2-low BC.

The Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of HER2-Low Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis Between HER2-Low and HER2-Zero Subtypes

BACKGROUND

HER2-low breast cancer (BC) is a newly defined subset of HER2-negative BC. However, it is still uncertain whether HER2-low BC can be categorized as a distinct biological/clinical subgroup with any prognostic significance.

METHODS

Invasive BC cases (n = 10,215) with Stage I-III were retrospectively analyzed to determine the HER2 status. The HER2 status was then divided into 3 groups: HER2-0, HER2-low, and HER2-positive.

RESULTS

The HER2 status was classified as HER2-0 in 1,227 cases (12.0%), HER2-low in 7,209 cases (70.6%), and HER2-positive in 1779 cases (17.4%). HER2-low cases had more positive nodes and were significantly associated with positive ER/PgR, lower nuclear grade, and lower Ki-67 index. HER2-0 had the lowest OS rate in the primary cases and after recurrence. HER2-0 in the node positive group had the lowest OS and was significantly different from HER2-low in the same group. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate for NAC was lowest in the HER2-low group. The DFS after NAC was significantly better in all the pCR cases, regardless of the HER2 status. However, the DFS was significantly lower in the HER2-low non-pCR cases.

CONCLUSION

HER2-low accounted for 70% of the cases and correlated with favorable biological markers. The HER2-low group had a significantly better OS than the HER2-0 group. However, the response to NAC was low in the HER2-low group, and this group had the poorest prognosis among all the non-pCR cases. These findings indicate that HER2-low may have a different biology and prognosis and therefore should be classified as a new entity.

Prognosis and influencing factors of ER-positive, HER2-low breast cancer patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study

Previously, we found that patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-low breast cancer are resistant to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and have worse outcomes than those who achieve pathological complete response (pCR) after NACT. This study aimed to investigate the prognosis and influencing factors in these patients. A total of 618 patients with ER-positive breast cancer who received standard thrice-weekly NACT were enrolled, including 411 patients with ER-positive, HER2-low breast cancer. Data on the clinicopathological features of these patients before and after NACT were collected. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify the independent factors affecting 5-year disease-free survival (DFS). Among the ER-positive, HER2-low patients, 49 (11.9%) achieved a pCR after NACT. A significant difference in survival was observed between patients with and without residual disease after NACT. Additionally, changes in immunohistochemical markers and tumor stages before and after NACT were found to be significant. According to univariate and multivariate analyses, cN_stage (P = 0.002), ER (P = 0.002) and Ki67 (P = 0.023) expression before NACT were significantly associated with 5-year DFS, while pT_stage (P = 0.015), pN_stage (P = 0.029), ER (P = 0.020) and Ki67 (P < 0.001) levels after NACT were related to 5-year DFS in ER-positive, HER2-low patients with residual disease. Our study suggested that high proliferation, low ER expression and advanced stage before and after NACT are associated with a poor prognosis, providing useful information for developing long-term treatment strategies for ER-positive, HER2-low breast cancer in patients with residual disease in the future.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low advanced or metastatic breast cancer: recommendations from the Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines

The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines are published as timely guidance on clinical issues in breast cancer treatment in Japan. In the recent edition of these guidelines, we addressed a new clinical question 34 (CQ 34, systemic treatment part) "Is trastuzumab deruxtecan recommended for patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-low breast cancer?" and a new future research question 7 (FRQ 7, pathological diagnosis part) "How is HER2-low breast cancer diagnosed for the indication of trastuzumab deruxtecan?". These questions address use of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-low breast cancer who have previously received chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The strengths of evidence and recommendation were determined through a quantitative and qualitative systematic review using multiple outcomes, including efficacy and safety. We conclude that trastuzumab deruxtecan is recommended for this patient population (strength of recommendation: 1; strength of evidence: moderate; CQ34) and that HER2-low expression for the indication of trastuzumab deruxtecan should be diagnosed using companion diagnostics based on appropriate criteria (FRQ7).

Clinical sequencing defines the somatic and germline mutation landscapes of Chinese HER2-Low Breast Cancer

More than half of the breast cancer initially labeled as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative actually exhibited low HER2 levels (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/FISH-) and were classified as HER2-low breast cancer. Previous research emphasized the significant biological heterogeneity in HER2-low breast cancer, highlighting the importance of accurately characterizing HER2-low tumors to promote the precise management of antibody‒drug conjugates. In this study, we established a large-scale targeted sequencing cohort (N = 1907) representing Chinese HER2-low breast cancer patients with detailed clinical annotation. Our research findings revealed that HER2-low breast cancer demonstrated distinct clinical pathological characteristics and mutation landscapes compared to HER2-zero group. When compared to HER2-zero tumors, HER2-low tumors exhibited a higher proportion of Luminal B subtypes and better disease-free survival. In hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer, HER2-low group showed a higher frequency of GATA3 somatic mutations, BRCA2 germline mutations, and mutations in the DNA damage repair pathway. In contrast, in HR-negative breast cancer, the HER2-low group displayed a higher frequency of PIK3CA mutations and PI3K pathway alterations. These findings offered valuable insights for the precise targeted treatment of HER2-low breast cancer in different HR statuses.

Study design for DESTINY-Breast Respond HER2-low Europe: T-DXd in patients with HER2-low advanced breast cancer

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is approved for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Results on T-DXd treatment in HER2-low mBC have so far been limited to clinical trials. DESTINY-Breast Respond HER2-low Europe (NCT05945732) is a multi-center, multi-country, observational, prospective, non-interventional study planning to enroll 1350 patients from 216 sites receiving T-DXd or conventional chemotherapy as their routine clinical care for advanced stage breast cancer in 12 European countries. This non-interventional study will provide real-world insight into T-DXd treatment for HER2-low mBC with data on effectiveness, safety and tolerability, patient-reported outcomes, treatment patterns, geriatric health status and HER2 testing. This will be beneficial for improving guidance to maximize patient treatment benefit.

HER2-low breast cancer and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a population-based cohort study

About half of breast cancers (BC) without amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) have a low HER2 protein expression level (HER2-low). The clinical impact of HER2-low and the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is unclear. This study aimed to assess the association between HER2-low BC and pathological response to NAC. Data from the Dutch Pathology Registry were collected for 11,988 BC patients treated with NAC between 2014 and 2022. HER2-low BC was defined as an immunohistochemical score of 1+ or 2+ and a negative molecular reflex test. We compared clinicopathological features of HER2-0 versus HER2-low BC and assessed the correlation between HER2 status and the pathological complete response (pCR) rate after NAC, including overall survival. Among hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumours, 67% (n=4,619) were HER2-low, compared to 47% (n=1,167) in the HR-negative group. Around 32% (n=207) of patients had a discordant HER2 status between the pre-NAC biopsy and the corresponding post-NAC resection, within which 87% (n=165) changed from HER2-0 to HER2-low or vice versa. The pCR rate was significantly lower in HER2-low BC compared to HER2-0 BC within the HR-positive group (4% versus 5%; p=0.022). However, the absolute difference was limited, so the clinical relevance is questionable. In HR-negative cases, the difference in pCR was not significant (32% versus 34%; p=0.266). No significant difference in overall survival was observed between HER2-low and HER2-0 tumours, regardless of hormone receptor status. The antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has improved survival outcomes of patients with HER2-low metastatic BC. The finding that one-third of the patients in this study had a discordant HER2 status between the pre-NAC biopsy and the post-NAC resection specimen could impact clinical decision-making should T-DXd be used in early BC treatment.

Do HER2-Low Tumors Have a Distinct Clinicopathologic Phenotype?

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer subtypes, distinguished by hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status, have different clinicopathologic features. With recognition of the clinical relevance of HER2-low, there is debate as to whether this is a distinct subtype. Our study aimed to determine whether HER2-low breast cancers have specific clinicopathologic features that differ from those of HER2-negative and HER2-positive cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 11,072 patients undergoing upfront surgery from 1998 to 2010 were identified from a single-institution prospectively maintained database. HER2 status was classified by immunohistochemistry (IHC)/fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as HER2 negative (41.2%), HER2 low (45%; IHC 1+ or 2+ with negative FISH), and HER2 positive (13.7%), and stratified by HR status. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable multinomial logistic regression analysis (MVA) were performed to determine associations among variables and subtypes.

RESULTS

Compared with HER2-negative tumors, HER2 low was associated with lymphovascular invasion [odds ratio (OR) 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.36; p = 0.003], multifocality (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.12-1.42; p < 0.001), nodal micrometastasis (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.31; p = 0.024), and lower rates of ≥ 3 positive nodes (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.90, p = 0.001). When stratified by HR expression, in both HR-positive and HR-negative tumors, age and multifocality were associated with HER2 low on UVA. On MVA, no variables were independently associated with both HR-negative and HR-positive/HER2-low tumors compared with HER2-negative tumors. In contrast, HER2-positive tumors, regardless of HR status, were associated with multifocality and an extensive intraductal component.

CONCLUSION

Clinicopathologic features of HER2-low tumors appear to be primarily related to HR status. Our findings do not support the characterization of HER2 low as a separate subtype.

Effect of HER2-low expression on neoadjuvant efficacy in operable breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of HER2-low expression (HER2-low) and HER2-zero expression (HER2-0) on the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and survival of patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients were followed up. Patients were divided into HER2-0 (immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 0 (IHC0)) and HER2-low (IHC1+ or IHC2+/in situ hybridization non-amplified (ISH-)) groups according to the IHC detection of puncture tissues. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the clinical characteristics, pCR rate and DFS were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were 24 (27.9%) cases with HER2-0 and 62 (72.1%) cases with HER2-low. Hormone receptor-positive (HR+) patients accounted for 77.4% of the HER2-low group, which was higher than 70.8% in the HER2-0 group, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.524). There were statistical differences in the pT and pN stages between HER2-low and HER2-0 subgroups in the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) group after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The HER2-low subgroup had an earlier T stage (p = 0.009), and the ratio of N0 to N1 in the HER2-low and HER2-0 subgroups was 92.9% and 71.4%, respectively (p = 0.037). The Ki-67 index and median PR value were significantly lower in the HER2-low group after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.002, p = 0.018). The HER2 IHC score was altered in the HER2-low group, and the HER-2 (2+) score changed significantly (p = 0.002). Seventy-eight patients with complete immunohistochemical data were analyzed. The discordance rate of the IHC score of HER2 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 38.5%, and eight patients with HER2-low showed HER2-0 status, with a discordance rate of 10.3%. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, The pCR rate was significantly lower in the HER2-low group compared with that in the HER2-0 group (4.8% vs. 8.3%; p = 0.914), but the recurrence and metastasis rates were lower in the HER2-low group (9.7% vs. 20.8%; p = 0.165). There were no differences in DFS between the two groups at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months (p = 0.076; p = 0.518; p = 0.245; p = 0.406). The subgroup analysis demonstrated no significant difference in DFS between HER2-low and HER2-0 subgroups in the HR + and TNBC groups (p = 0.141, p = 0.637).

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study indicates that HER2-low has no significant effect on neoadjuvant efficacy in operable breast cancer. There were no statistical differences in clinical characteristics, pCR rate, and DFS between the HER2-low and the HER2-0 groups. There was no evidence that a HER2-low status constitutes a unique biological subtype, suggesting that more clinical data might be needed to verify these observations.

Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Hormone Therapy and Anti-HER2 Treatment: An Update on Treatment Strategies

Hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer represents a distinct subtype expressing estrogen and progesterone receptors with an overexpression of HER2. Approximately 14% of female breast cancer cases are HER2-positive, with the majority being HR-positive. These tumors show a cross-talk between the hormonal and HER2 pathways; the interaction has implications for the treatment options for the disease. In this review, we analyze the biology of HR-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer and summarize the evidence concerning the standard of care options both in neoadjuvant/adjuvant settings and in advanced disease. Additionally, we focus on new trials and drugs for HR-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer and the new entity: HER2-low breast cancer.

Clinical, Epidemiologic, and Pathologic Significance of ERBB2-Low Expression in Breast Cancer

Importance

It is unclear whether breast cancer (BC) with low ERBB2 expression (ERBB2-low) is a distinct clinical, pathological, and epidemiological entity from BC classified as no ERBB2 expression (ERBB2-negative).

Objective

To evaluate the clinical, pathological, and epidemiologic features of BC with ERBB2-low expression compared with ERBB2-negative BC in a large population study.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study was conducted as part of the Pathways Study, a prospective, racially and ethnically diverse cohort study of women with BC enrolled between 2006 and 2013 in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC). The hematoxylin and eosin slides underwent centralized pathology review, including the percentage of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Breast biomarker results were extracted from pathology reports, and women were included if they had a documented ERBB2 value that was not classified ERBB2-positive. Data were analyzed from February 2023 through January 2024.

Exposure

Clinical and tumor characteristics associated with BC and ERBB2-low or ERBB2-negative status.

Main Outcome and Measures

ERBB2-low was defined as immunohistochemistry score of 1+ or 2+ (negative by in situ hybridization); ERBB2-negative was defined as immunohistochemistry score of 0+. Other data were collected by self-report or extraction from electronic health records, including BC risk factors, tumor characteristics, treatment modality, and survival outcomes, with recurrence-free survival (RFS) as the primary outcome and overall survival (OS) and BC-specific mortality (BCSM) as secondary outcomes. The clinical, pathological, and epidemiological variables were compared between ERBB2-low and ERBB2-negative BC.

Results

Of 2200 eligible patients (all female; with mean [SD] age, 60.4 [11.9] years), 1295 (57.2%) had tumors that were ERBB2-low. Hormone receptors were positive in 1956 patients (88.9%). The sample included 291 Asian patients (13.2%), 166 Black patients (7.5%), 253 Hispanic patients (11.5%), 1439 White patients (65.4%), and 51 patients (2.3%) who identified as other race or ethnicity (eg, American Indian or Alaska Native and Pacific Islander). Within the hormone receptor-negative group, patients whose tumors had ERBB2-low staining, compared with those with ERBB2-negative tumors, had better OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.33-0.91; P = .02), RFS (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30-0.95; P = .03), and BCSM (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.22-0.84; P = .01). In multivariable survival analysis stratified by hormone receptor status and adjusted for key covariates, patients with ERBB2-low and hormone receptor-negative tumors had lower overall mortality (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27-0.83; P = .009), RFS (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24-0.86; P = .02), and BCSM (subdistribution HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.10-0.46; P < .001) compared with patients with ERBB2-negative and hormone receptor-negative tumors. Within the hormone receptor-negative subtype, patients with ERBB2-low and high TILs tumors had better survival across all 3 outcomes compared with patients with ERBB2-negative and low TILs tumors. Additionally, patients with ERBB2-low and low TILs tumors had better BCSM (subdistribution HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14-0.92; P = .03).

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that there were clinical, pathological, and epidemiological differences between ERBB2-low and ERBB2-negative BC, raising the possibility that ERBB2-low might be a unique biologic entity.

Prognostic value of histopathologic traits independent of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels in chemotherapy-naïve patients with triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

In the absence of prognostic biomarkers, most patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (eTNBC) are treated with combination chemotherapy. The identification of biomarkers to select patients for whom treatment de-escalation or escalation could be considered remains an unmet need. We evaluated the prognostic value of histopathologic traits in a unique cohort of young, (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy-naïve patients with early-stage (stage I or II), node-negative TNBC and long-term follow-up, in relation to stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) for which the prognostic value was recently reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied all 485 patients with node-negative eTNBC from the population-based PARADIGM cohort which selected women aged <40 years diagnosed between 1989 and 2000. None of the patients had received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy according to standard practice at the time. Associations between histopathologic traits and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were analyzed with Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 20.0 years, an independent prognostic value for BCSS was observed for lymphovascular invasion (LVI) [adjusted (adj.) hazard ratio (HR) 2.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.49-3.69], fibrotic focus (adj. HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.09-2.37) and sTILs (per 10% increment adj. HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.82). In the sTILs <30% subgroup, the presence of LVI resulted in a higher cumulative incidence of breast cancer death (at 20 years, 58%; 95% CI 41% to 72%) compared with when LVI was absent (at 20 years, 32%; 95% CI 26% to 39%). In the ≥75% sTILs subgroup, the presence of LVI might be associated with poor survival (HR 11.45, 95% CI 0.71-182.36, two deaths). We confirm the lack of prognostic value of androgen receptor expression and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 -low status.

CONCLUSIONS

sTILs, LVI and fibrotic focus provide independent prognostic information in young women with node-negative eTNBC. Our results are of importance for the selection of patients for de-escalation and escalation trials.

Clinicopathological characteristics and value of HER2-low expression evolution in breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and value of HER2-low expression evolution in breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

Patients with HER2 negative breast cancer receiving NAC from January 2017 to December 2020 were enrolled in this study. The clinicopathological characteristics, response to NAC, evolution of HER2 and prognostic value were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

410 patients were included. The proportion of HR positive disease in HER2-low cases was higher than in HER2-zero population (75.8 % vs. 65.8 %, P = 0.040). No statistical significant difference in pCR rate was observed between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients (33.8 % vs. 39.3 %, P = 0.290) when pCR was defined as ypTis/0ypN0. Exploratory analysis revealed that the pCR rate of HER2-low cases was significantly lower than HER2-zero patients in the entire population (19.8 % vs. 33.3 %, P = 0.004) and HR positive population (12.6 % vs. 29.9 %, P = 0.001) when pCR was defined as ypT0ypN0. The evolution rate of HER2 expression after NAC was 31.0 % in HER2-zero patients and 24.7 % in HER2-low patients. Compared with patients with HR positive disease, patients with TNBC had higher evolution rate of HER2 expression after NAC (37.7 % vs. 23.6 %). Significant association was observed between HER2 evolution with histology type and Ki-67 index in HER2-zero patients and with lymph node involvement, HR status and Ki-67 index in HER2-low patients. Prognostic impact of HER2 evolution was not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

HR positive and HR negative HER2-low breast cancer exhibit different clinicopathological features, response to NAC and HER2 evolution after treatment.

New insights into HER2-low breast cancer brain metastasis: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

A considerable number of patients with breast cancer will suffer from brain metastasis in the advanced setting. The HER2 status serves as a significant prognostic factor and the reference of applying treatment for patients with breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM).

METHODS

Between January 2010 and July 2021, patients with BCBM who had available HER2 status were identified. The patients with HER2 1+ in immunohistochemistry (IHC) or IHC 2+ and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) negative were categorized as HER2-low. Comparisons were conducted between the HER2-low and HER2-zero population. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) after the diagnosis of BCBM. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

In this study, we analyzed 71 patients with the HER2-low breast cancer subtype and 64 patients with the HER2-zero subtype. Despite the limited sample size, our findings revealed a significantly better OS for patients with HER2-low cancer compared to their HER2-zero counterparts (26 m vs 20 m, p = 0.0017). This trend was particularly notable in the HR-negative group (26 m vs 13 m, p = 0.0078), whereas no significant difference was observed among the HR-positive patients. Furthermore, Cox regression analysis revealed that the HER2-low status was an independent prognostic factor for better survival in the HR-negative patients (p = 0.046 in multivariate analysis).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients diagnosed with HER2-low BCBM exhibited a more favorable prognosis than those with HER2-zero BCBM, particularly within the HR-negative subgroup. The low expression of HER2 is supposed to be linked to the prolonged survival of BCBM patients.

HER2-Low Expression in Male Breast Cancer: Results from a Multicenter Series in Italy

In the field of breast cancer care, a significant breakthrough has occurred with the recognition of HER2-low expression as a target for novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADC). This discovery is reshaping the treatment landscape, challenging previous perceptions that considered HER2-low as clinically insignificant. The ability to target HER2-low expression is expected to have substantial clinical implications, irrespective of gender, including in cases of male breast cancer (MBC). However, an estimate of the prevalence of the HER2-low subtype in MBC is missing. This retrospective, observational, multicenter study was aimed at characterizing the HER2-low subtype in MBC. For the purpose of this study, the three-tiered categorization of HER2 (HER2-0, HER2-low, and HER2-positive) was used to reclassify the HER2-negative group into HER-0 or HER2-low subtypes. In the whole series of 144 invasive MBCs, 79 (54.9%) were HER2-0 (IHC scores of 0), 39 (27.1%) HER2-low (IHC scores of 1+/2+ with negative ISH), and 26 (18.0%) HER2-positive (IHC scores of 3+/2+ with positive ISH). Specifically, among hormone receptor-positive (HR+) HER2-negative invasive MBCs, 34.8% were HER2-low and 65.2% HER2-0. Compared with HER2-0, HER2-low subtype was associated with a positive lymph node involvement (p = 0.01). Other pathologic characteristics including histology, staging, and grading did not show notable variations between the two subtypes. The presence of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs) did not significantly differ between HER2-0 and HER2-low MBCs. However, about 13% of HER2-low MBCs had germline PVs in BRCA1/2 genes, mainly BRCA2, a clinically relevant observation in the context of combined target therapy. Overall, our data, which focused on the largest gender-specific breast cancer series, to our knowledge, confirm that the emerging three-tiered categorization of HER2 (HER2-0, HER2-low, and HER2-positive) can also be considered in MBC, to mitigate both the gender gap and the underrepresentation of males in clinical trials.

Treatment Patterns and Health Outcomes among Patients with HER2 IHC0/-Low Metastatic or Recurrent Breast Cancer

Improved understanding of the biological heterogeneity of breast cancer (BC) has facilitated the development of more effective and personalized approaches to treatment. This study describes real-world evidence on treatment patterns and outcomes for a population-based cohort of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) IHC0 and -low BC with de novo or recurrent disease from Alberta, Canada. Patients 18+ years old diagnosed with HER2 IHC0/-low, de novo/recurrent BC from 2010 to 2019 were identified using Alberta's cancer registry. Analyses of these patients' existing electronic medical records and administrative claims data were conducted to examine patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes. A total of 3413 patients were included in the study, of which 72.10% initiated first line hormonal and non-hormonal systemic therapy. The 1-year overall survival (OS) was 81.09% [95% CI, 79.52-82.69]. Recurrent patients had a higher OS compared to de novo patients: 54.30 months [95% CI, 47.80-61.90] vs. 31.5 months [95% CI, 28.40-35.90], respectively. Median OS was 43.4 months [95% CI, 40.70-47.10] and 35.80 months [95% CI, 29.00-41.70] among patients with HER2-low and HER2 IHC0 cancer, respectively. The study results provide real-world evidence regarding the clinical outcomes of HER2 IHC0/-low and de novo/recurrent disease.

The impact of the HER2-low status on conditional survival in patients with breast cancer

Introduction

With recent advances in breast cancer (BC) treatment, the disease-free survival (DFS) of patients is increasing and the risk factors for recurrence and metastasis are changing. However, a dynamic approach to assessing the risk of recurrent metastasis in BC is currently lacking. This study aimed to develop a dynamically changing prediction model for recurrent metastases based on conditional survival (CS) analysis.

Methods

Clinical and pathological data from patients with BC who underwent surgery at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between August 2011 and August 2022 were retrospectively analysed. The risk of recurrence and metastasis in patients with varying survival rates was calculated using CS analysis, and a risk prediction model was constructed.

Results

A total of 4244 patients were included in this study, with a median follow-up of 83.16 ± 31.59 months. Our findings suggested that the real-time DFS of patients increased over time, and the likelihood of DFS after surgery correlated with the number of years of prior survival. We explored different risk factors for recurrent metastasis in baseline patients, 3-year, and 5-year disease-free survivors, and found that low HER2 was a risk factor for subsequent recurrence in patients with 5-year DFS. Based on this, conditional nomograms were developed. The nomograms showed good predictive ability for recurrence and metastasis in patients with BC.

Conclusion

Our study showed that the longer patients with BC remained disease-free, the greater their chances of remaining disease-free again. Predictive models for recurrence and metastasis risk based on CS analysis can help improve the confidence of patients fighting cancer and help doctors personalise treatment and follow-up plans.

Prognostic implications of HER2NEU-low in metastatic breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

We explored characteristics and clinical outcomes of HER2-negative and HER2-low metastatic breast cancers using real-world data.

METHODS

We queried the National Cancer Database to identify MBC patients that were HER2-low or HER2-negative per immunohistochemical staining. A binomial regression analysis identified demographic and clinical correlates of each subtype. A Cox multivariable regression analysis (MVA) and propensity-match analysis were performed to identify correlates of survival.

RESULTS

Excluding missing data, 24,636 MBC patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2015 were identified; 27.9% were HER2-negative and 72.1% were HER2-low. There were no relevant demographic differences between the groups. HER2-low tumors were half as likely to have concomitant hormone receptor-positive status (p < 0.01). The 3-year survival rate among hormone receptor-negative patients was 33.8% for HER2-low and 32.2% for HER2-negative (p < 0.05), and 60.9% and 55.6% in HER2-low and HER2-negative cases among hormone receptor-positive patients (p < 0.05), respectively. HER2-low cases were associated with better survival on MVA (HR =0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99) and remained superior with propensity-matching (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.89-0.96). In a subset analysis isolated to hormone receptor-positive cases, HER2-low remained correlated with improved survival (HR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.98) with propensity-matched MVA. Correlates of worse survival include older age as a continuous variable (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.02-1.02) and Black race (HR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.20-1.32) [all p < 0.01].

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest such analysis performed to date, our study demonstrates a small but statistically significant association with improved survival for HER2-low tumors compared to HER2-negative tumors in MBC.

Standardized pathology report for HER2 testing in compliance with 2023 ASCO/CAP updates and 2023 ESMO consensus statements on HER2-low breast cancer

Since the release of the DESTINY-Breast04 (DB-04) trial findings in June 2022, the field of pathology has seen a renaissance of HER2 as a predictive biomarker in breast cancer. The trial focused on patients with metastatic breast cancer who were classified as "HER2-low," i.e., those with immunohistochemistry (IHC) HER2 1 + or 2 + and negative in situ hybridization (ISH) results. The study revealed that treating these patients with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) instead of the oncologist's chosen chemotherapy led to outstanding improvements in survival. This has challenged the existing binary HER2 pathological classification system, which categorized tumors as either positive (overexpression/amplification) or negative, as per the ASCO/CAP 2018 guideline reaffirmed by ASCO/CAP 2023 guideline update. Given that DB-04 excluded patients with HER2 IHC score 0 status, the results of the ongoing DB-06 trial may shed further light on the potential benefits of T-DXd therapy for these patients. Roughly half of all breast cancers are estimated to belong to the HER2-low category, which does not represent a distinct or specific subtype of cancer. Instead, it encompasses a diverse group of tumors that exhibit clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular variations. However, HER2-low offers a distinctive biomarker status that identifies a specific therapeutic regimen (i.e., T-DXd) linked to a favorable prognosis in breast cancer. This unique association emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying these tumors. Differentiating between a HER2 IHC score 0 and score 1 + has not been clinically significant until now. To ensure accurate classification and avoid misdiagnosis, it is necessary to adopt standardized procedures, guidelines, and specialized training for pathologists in interpreting HER2 expression in the lower spectrum. Additionally, the utilization of artificial intelligence holds promise in supporting this endeavor. Here, we address the current state of the art and unresolved issues in assessing HER2-low status, with a particular emphasis on the score 0. We explore the dilemma surrounding the exclusion of HER2-zero patients from potentially beneficial therapy based on traditional HER2 testing. Additionally, we examine the clinical context, considering that DB-04 primarily involved heavily pretreated late-stage metastatic breast cancers. We also delve into emerging evidence suggesting that extrapolating HER2-low status from the original diagnosis may lead to misleading results. Finally, we provide recommendations for conducting high-quality testing and propose a standardized pathology report in compliance with 2023 ASCO/CAP updates and 2023 ESMO consensus statements on HER2-low breast cancer.

Prognostic Impact of HER2-Low and HER2-Zero in Resectable Breast Cancer with Different Hormone Receptor Status: A Landmark Analysis of Real-World Data from the National Cancer Center of China

BACKGROUND

The prognostic impact of HER2-low on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with resectable breast cancer (BC) remains controversial, partly resulting from the hormone receptor (HR) status.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prognostic impact of HER2-low in different HR subgroups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively retrieved medical records of treatment-naive primary HER2-low and HER2-zero BC patients who were diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma and underwent surgery in the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2009 to September 2017 (n = 7371). We compared the clinicopathologic features and performed Cox regression and landmark survival analyses to explore the prognostic impact of HER2-low on survival outcomes during distinct post-surgery intervals-36 months, 60 months, and 120 months.

RESULTS

HER2-low BC, compared to HER2-zero BC, exhibited less aggressive clinicopathologic features, such as smaller invasion size, lower grade, increased nerve invasion, higher HR positivity, and a higher proportion of low-Ki67 cases. In the HR-positive subgroup, HER2-low demonstrated improved OS (p = 0.046) and DFS (p = 0.026) within 60 months. Conversely, HER2-low displayed worse DFS (p = 0.046) in the HR-negative subgroup after 36 months from surgery. The findings remained robust in uni- and multi-variable Cox models.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-low BCs manifested less aggressive clinicopathologic features than the HER2-zero cases. The prognostic impact of HER2-low in resectable BCs exhibits variability contingent upon the patients' HR status.

Clinicopathologic Features and Prognosis of Female Early Breast Cancer With HER2 Low Expression: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Background

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with low expression of human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) have been proven to benefit from HER2 targeted therapy. We aimed to determine how HER2-low status affected survival and metastatic risk as well as how it affected pathological complete response (pCR) in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) patients.

Methods

According to the results of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) testing, 321 female patients were sorted into HER2-low (IHC 1+/2+ with ISH negative) and HER2-zero (IHC 0) groups using propensity score matching (PSM). Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and distant disease-free survival (DDFS) were compared for both groups, while pCR was only analyzed for NAC patients.

Results

In total, 97 patients in each group after PSM were included. We discovered that pCR was not associated with HER2 expression status in 45 patients who underwent NAC. Five-year OS in the HER2-low group was significantly higher (98.99%) than in the HER2-zero group (95.87%, P = .044); however, this difference was not reflected in the 5-year DFS (90.61 vs 90.52%, P = .868) and 5-year DDFS (93.67 vs 91.53%, P = .757). Meanwhile, multivariate analysis revealed that HER2-low expression could indicate better OS (P = .047, hazard ratios [HRs] = 16.121, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.035-251.046), but it had no prognostic value for DFS or DDFS.

Conclusion

When compared with HER2-zero expression, HER2-low expression was not connected to pCR and could not modify metastasis risk in female patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC), but it may prolong patient survival.