Diagnostic performance of 64-slice multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography in women

Prediction of Major Adverse Coronary Events Using the Coronary Risk Score in Women

Purpose To establish a COronary Risk Score in WOmen (CORSWO) to predict major adverse coronary events (MACE). Materials and Methods This retrospective analysis included 2226 female individuals (mean age, 66.7 years ± 11.6 [SD]) from a cohort of 25 943 consecutive patients referred for clinical gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (gSPECT MPI). During the follow-up (mean, 4 years ± 2.7) after gSPECT MPI, occurrence of MACE (unstable angina requiring hospitalization, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, cardiac death) was assessed. The patients were divided into training (n = 1460) and validation (n = 766) groups. To obtain the predictor model, multiple Cox regression analyses were performed. Results In the training group, 148 female individuals had MACE (2.6% per year). The best model (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.83]; Brier score: 0.08) to predict MACE in female individuals included the following variables: age older than 69 years (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.58, P = .01), diabetes mellitus (HR: 1.47, P = .03), pharmacologic test (HR: 1.63, P = .01), ST-segment depression (≥1 mm) (HR: 2.02, P < .001), myocardial ischemia greater than 5% (HR: 2.21, P < .001), perfusion defect at rest greater than 9% (HR: 1.96, P = .009), perfusion defect at stress greater than 6% (HR: 1.63, P = .03), and end-systolic volume index greater than 15 mL (HR: 2.04, P < .001). During validation, the model achieved moderate performance (AUC: 0.78 [95% CI: 0.70, 0.83]). CORSWO obtained from these variables allowed for stratification of female individuals into four risk levels: low (score: 0-3, HR: 1), moderate (score: 4-6, HR: 1.58), high (score: 7-11, HR: 4.13), and very high (score: >11, HR: 13.87). The high and very high risk levels (HR: 5.29) predicted MACE in female individuals, with excellent performance (AUC: 0.78 [95% CI: 0.72, 0.80]). Conclusion With clinical, stress test, and gSPECT MPI variables, CORSWO effectively stratified female individuals according to coronary risk and was able to detect those with high and very high risk. Keywords: SPECT, Cardiac, Coronary Arteries, Women, Risk Stratification, Cardiac Event, CORSWO, MACE, Gated SPECT Supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2024.

Multimodality Imaging in the Detection of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women

Women with coronary artery disease tend to have a worse short and long-term prognosis relative to men and the incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is increasing. Women are less likely to present with classic anginal symptoms when compared with men and more likely to be misdiagnosed. Several non-invasive imaging modalities are available for diagnosing ischemic heart disease in women and many of these modalities can also assist with prognostication and help to guide management. Selection of the optimal imaging modality to evaluate women with possible ischemic heart disease is a scenario which clinicians often encounter. Earlier modalities such as exercise treadmill testing demonstrate significant performance variation in men and women, while newer modalities such as coronary CT angiography, myocardial perfusion imaging and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are highly specific and sensitive for the detection of ischemia and coronary artery disease with greater parity between sexes. Individual factors, availability, diagnostic performance, and female-specific considerations such as pregnancy status may influence the decision to select one modality over another. Emerging techniques such as strain rate imaging, CT-myocardial perfusion imaging and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging present additional options for diagnosing ischemia and coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Decreased Diagnostic Accuracy of Multislice Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Women with Atypical Angina Symptoms

Background:

Multislice computed tomography (MSCT) coronary angiography (CAG) is a noninvasive technique with a reported high diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease (CAD). Women, more frequently than men, are known to develop atypical angina symptoms. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the diagnostic accuracy of MSCT in women with atypical presentation differs from that in men.

Methods:

We enrolled 396 in-hospital patients (141 women and 255 men) with suspected or proven CAD who successively underwent both MSCT and invasive CAG. CAD was defined as any coronary stenosis of ≥50% on conventional invasive CAG, which was used as the reference standard. The patients were divided into typical and atypical groups based on their symptoms of angina pectoris. The diagnostic accuracy of MSCT, including its sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value (PPV), was calculated to determine the usefulness of MSCT in assessing stenoses. The diagnostic performance of MSCT was also assessed by constructing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results:

The PPV (91% vs. 97%, χ² = 5.705, P < 0.05) and diagnostic accuracy (87% vs. 93%, χ² = 5.093, P < 0.05) of MSCT in detecting CAD were lower in women than in men. Atypical presentation was an independent influencing factor on the diagnostic accuracy of MSCT in women (odds ratio = 4.94, 95% confidence intervals: 1.16–20.92, Walds = 4.69, P < 0.05). Compared with those in the atypical group, women with typical angina pectoris had higher PPV (98% vs. 74%, χ² = 17.283. P < 0.001), diagnostic accuracy (93% vs. 72%, χ² = 9.571, P < 0.001), and area under the ROC curve (0.91 vs. 0.64, Z = 2.690, P < 0.01) in MSCT diagnosis.

Conclusions:

Although MSCT is a reliable diagnostic modality for the exclusion of significant coronary artery stenoses in all patients, gender and atypical symptoms might have some influence on its diagnostic accuracy.

Assessing and Modifying Coronary Artery Disease Risk in Women

OPINION STATEMENT

Despite continued advances in the field, cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in women in the USA with an annual mortality rate that has remained higher for women as compared to men. The factors leading to this sex difference remain incompletely understood. Likely contributors include atypical symptoms at presentation and lack of recognition of cardiovascular risk by women and their providers alike. In addition, women have a higher burden of comorbidities at the time of disease diagnosis and can have differential pathophysiological mechanisms of their acute events. Women also can develop unique cardiovascular risk factors such as preeclampsia and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. As a result, when women present with symptoms, even atypical, healthcare providers should increase their index level of suspicion for cardiovascular disease. Even after diagnosis, women are less likely to receive guideline-directed medical therapies and be referred for coronary angiography or cardiac rehabilitation. Thus, greater awareness of and research into the aspects of coronary disease that remain unique to women is critical, as women presenting with coronary disease continue to receive disparate care as compared to men. Improvements in awareness and care and new research avenues may reduce the incidence and complications of cardiovascular disease among women.

Women-specific factors to consider in risk, diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease

In the era of individualized medicine, gaps in knowledge remain about sex-specific risk factors, diagnostic and treatment options that might reduce mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD) and improve outcomes for both women and men. In this review, contributions of biological mechanisms involving the sex chromosomes and the sex hormones on the cardiovascular system will be discussed in relationship to the female-specific risk factors for CVD: hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, menopause and use of hormonal therapies for contraception and menopausal symptoms. Additionally, sex-specific factors to consider in the differential diagnosis and treatment of four prevalent CVDs (hypertension, stroke, coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure) will be reviewed with emphasis on areas where additional research is needed.

Diagnostic accuracy of 64 slice multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography in left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Background

Detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) is pivotal in etiologic assessment and management of left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. Only a limited number of studies have specifically addressed the accuracy of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in detection/exclusion of CAD in patients with LV systolic dysfunction.

Methods

We included patients who were referred for CCTA and invasive coronary angiography within 6 months of each other because of chest pain, either as part of clinical work-up in two Los Angeles medical centers from September 2006 to May 2010 or as part of the multicenter ACCURACY trial. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and likelihood ratios of 64 slice multidetector CCTA against coronary angiography were calculated.

Results

Five hundred and thirty-seven patients were included: 228 (42.5%) were women, mean age was 62 ± 12 years, 82 (15.3%) had LV systolic dysfunction (defined by LVEF < 50%). On a patient-based model, the sensitivity of CCTA to detect 50% and 70% coronary lesions was excellent across all LVEF-derived cohorts, ranging from 92% to 100%. The negative predictive value was similarly excellent, ranging from 88% to 100%. CCTA was fairly specific for CAD, with specificity ranging from 83% to 93%, and positive predictive value from 81% to 92%. There was no significant between-group difference for any of the accuracy measures for detecting coronary stenosis at 50% or 70% cutoff.

Conclusion

Sixty-four slice multidetector CCTA is a very sensitive and fairly specific noninvasive diagnostic procedure for detecting coronary stenosis in patients with chest pain regardless of LV systolic function at presentation.

Cardiac CT in women: clinical application and considerations

Cardiac computed tomography (CT) has special considerations and applications in women for the evaluation of coronary heart disease (CHD). Unique aspects of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in women include atypical symptoms and a later presentation of CHD. Disparities exist in mortality trends of CVD between men and women along with a lack of patient awareness of CVD as a significant cause of mortality for women. Differences have also become evident among plaque characteristics between the 2 sexes, with a relative increased prevalence of noncalcified plaque in women. Traditional risk prediction models, such as the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), have limitations in this population. Coronary calcium scanning contributes significantly to the accuracy of CHD detection on top of traditional CV risk factors in asymptomatic women. Coronary CT angiography has proven accurate for the diagnosis of significant CHD as well as cost effective in the evaluation of symptomatic women. The safety issue of radiation exposure with cardiac CT warrants special consideration for women. Concern for radiation-related cancer risks and organ-specific dose delivered to the breast is being addressed by radiation-reducing techniques. Future technologic advances in CT may allow for simultaneous screening for CHD and other disease processes, such as osteoporosis, breast cancer, and visceral adiposity in one routine test.