1
|
Kaya V, Tahtabasi M, Akin Y, Karaman E, Gezer M, Kilicaslan N. Prognostic Value of Vertebral Bone Density in the CT Scans of Sepsis Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. J Clin Densitom 2023; 26:101417. [PMID: 37269790 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the prognostic value of vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) and its relationship with mortality using the computed tomography (CT) scans of sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit. METHODS In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with sepsis at the intensive care unit between January and December 2022 were evaluated. Bone density was manually measured from the vertebral body using axial CT images. The relationship of clinical variables and patient outcomes with vertebral BMD, mortality, and mechanical ventilation was investigated. A lower BMD (osteoporosis) was defined as ≤100 HU. RESULTS The study included 213 patients (95 females, 44.6%). The mean age of all patients was 60.1±18.7 years. At least one comorbidity was present in 64.7% (n=138) of the patients, and the most common comorbidity was hypertension (n=73, 34.2%). The mortality rate was 21.1% (n=45), and the mechanical ventilation rate was 17.4% (n=37), both being statistically significantly higher among the patients with a lower BMD (36.4 vs. 12.9%; p<0.001 and 29.7 vs. 10.8%; p=0.001, respectively). The rate of a lower BMD was significantly higher in the mortality group (59.5 vs. 29.5%; p=0.001). In the regression analysis, a lower BMD [odds ratio (OR), 2.785; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.231-6.346, p=0.014] was a significant independent predictor of mortality. Interobserver agreement for BMD measurement was excellent, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.919 (95% CI: 0.904-0.951). CONCLUSION Vertebral BMD is a strong independent predictor of mortality and can be easily and reproducible evaluated on the thoracoabdominal CT images of patients admitted to the intensive care unit with a diagnosis of sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veysel Kaya
- Department of Radiology, Harran University Faculty of Medicine, Sanliurfa, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Tahtabasi
- Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences-Mehmet Akif Inan Education and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
| | - Yasin Akin
- Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences-Mehmet Akif Inan Education and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey
| | - Ergin Karaman
- Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences-Mehmet Akif Inan Education and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Gezer
- Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences-Mehmet Akif Inan Education and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey
| | - Nihat Kilicaslan
- Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences-Mehmet Akif Inan Education and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang Y, Huang Y. Association between bone mineral density and cardiovascular disease in older adults. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1103403. [PMID: 37427263 PMCID: PMC10328748 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1103403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and aims Cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis are common diseases in older adults with high morbidity. The study on the interaction between the two in pathogenic mechanisms has been paid much attention by the majority of researchers. This study aimed to explore the relationship between bone mineral density and cardiovascular disease in older adults. Methods The primary data was downloaded from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database of the United States. Multivariate logistic regression model, generalized additive model, and smooth curve fitting were used to explore the relationship between bone mineral density and cardiovascular events risk. When a curve relationship was found, a two-piecewise linear model was used to calculate the inflection point. In addition, subgroup analysis was also performed. Results A total of 2097 subjects were included in this study. After adjusting for potential confounders, no significant association was found between lumbar bone mineral density and cardiovascular disease, while femur bone mineral density had a non-linear relationship with cardiovascular disease, with an inflection point of 0.741 gm/cm2. When bone mineral density was <0.741 gm/cm2, the risk of cardiovascular disease decreased speedily. Once bone mineral density exceeded this value, the risk of cardiovascular disease continued to decrease, but the trend became significantly slower. Compared with patients with normal bone mass, osteoporosis was associated with a 2.05-fold increased risk of cardiovascular disease (95% CI 1.68-5.52). There were no significant differences in interaction tests of all subgroups (p for interaction >0.05) except race. Conclusion Our results indicated that bone mineral density was closely associated with the prevalence of cardiovascular disease in older adults over 60 years old, especially the femur bone mineral density was negatively non-linear associated with cardiovascular disease risk, with an inflection point of 0.741 gm/cm2.
Collapse
|
3
|
Bakhsh N, Banjar M, Baig M. Correlation of bone density measured on CT chest with the severity of COVID-19 infection: A retrospective study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0286395. [PMID: 37289783 PMCID: PMC10249830 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This retrospective study investigated the correlation between bone mineral density (BMD) and COVID-19 severity among COVID-19 patients who underwent chest computed tomography (CT) scans. METHODS This study was carried out at the King Abdullah Medical Complex in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, one of the largest COVID-19 centers in the western province. All adult COVID-19 patients who had a chest CT between January 2020 and April 2022 were included in the study. The pulmonary severity scores (PSS) and vertebral BMD measurements were obtained from the patient's CT chest. Data from the patients' electronic records were collected. RESULTS The average patient age was 56.4 years, and most (73.5%) patients were men. Diabetes (n = 66, 48.5%), hypertension (n = 56, 41.2%), and coronary artery disease (n = 17, 12.5%) were the most prevalent comorbidities. Approximately two-thirds of hospitalized patients required ICU admission (64%), and one-third died (30%). The average length of stay in the hospital was 28.4 days. The mean CT pneumonia severity score (PSS) was 10.6 at the time of admission. Patients with lower vertebral BMD (< = 100) numbered 12 (8.8%), while those with higher vertebral BMD (>100) numbered 124 (91.2%). Only 46 out of the total survived patients (n = 95) were admitted to the ICU versus all deceased (P<0.01). The logistic regression analysis revealed that an elevated PSS upon admission resulted in a reduced chance of survival. Age, gender, and BMD did not predict survival chances. CONCLUSION The BMD had no prognostic advantage, and the PSS was the significant factor that could have predicted the outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noha Bakhsh
- Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, Department of Medicine, Division of Radiology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mai Banjar
- Department of Medical Imaging, King Abdullah Medical Complex, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mukhtiar Baig
- Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
AlJaroudi WA, Hage FG. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2020: positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance. J Nucl Cardiol 2021; 28:2100-2111. [PMID: 34105040 PMCID: PMC8186871 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-021-02685-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Although the year 2020 was different from other years in many respects, the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology published excellent articles pertaining to imaging in patients with cardiovascular disease due to the dedication of the investigators in our field all over the world. In this review, we will summarize a selection of these articles to provide a concise review of the main advancements that have recently occurred in the field and provide the reader with an opportunity to review a wide selection of articles. We will focus on publications dealing with positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance and hope that you will find this review helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wael A AlJaroudi
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Fadi G Hage
- Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Lyons Harrison Research Building 306, 1900 University BLVD, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
- Section of Cardiology, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tahtabasi M, Kilicaslan N, Akin Y, Karaman E, Gezer M, Icen YK, Sahiner F. The Prognostic Value of Vertebral Bone Density on Chest CT in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients. J Clin Densitom 2021; 24:506-515. [PMID: 34353732 PMCID: PMC8302819 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2021.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic value of the vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) on chest computed tomography (CT) in COVID-19 patients. The chest CT of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia were evaluated for Pneumonia Severity Score (PSS) as the ratio of the volume of involved lung parenchyma to the total lung volume. In addition, BMD was manually measured from the vertebral corpus using axial CT images. The relationships of clinical variables, PSS and vertebral BMD with patient outcomes, namely mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mechanical ventilation were investigated. Lower BMD was defined as ≤100 HU. The study included 209 patients (118 males, 56.4%). As a result of the univariate analysis, the rates of mortality, ICU admission and mechanical ventilation were 17.2% (n = 36), 24.8% (n = 52), and 20.6% (n = 43), respectively, and they were significantly higher among the patients with lower BMD (38.1 vs 13.0%, p < 0.001; 33.4 vs 21.2%, p = 0.002; and 38.1 vs 8.2%, p < 0.001, respectively). In the mortality group, PSS was significantly higher (median, 9 vs 5; p < 0.001) and vertebral BMD was significantly lower (median, 83 vs 139; p < 0.001). Severe clinical incidence was significantly higher in patients with lower BMD compared to those with higher BMD (39.7 vs 24.7% and p = 0.028). There was a significant correlation between clinical classification and lower BMD (r = 0.152 and p = 0.028). The multivariate analysis revealed vertebral BMD [odds ratio (OR), 1.028; 95% CI, 1.011-1.045, p = 0.001) and lower BMD (OR, 4.682; 95% CI, 1.784-12.287, p = 0.002) as significant independent predictors of mortality. Vertebral BMD is a strong independent predictor of mortality that is reproducible and can be easily evaluated on the chest CT images of COVID-19 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Tahtabasi
- Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences- Mehmet Akif Inan Education and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
| | - Nihat Kilicaslan
- Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences- Mehmet Akif Inan Education and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey
| | - Yasin Akin
- Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences- Mehmet Akif Inan Education and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey
| | - Ergin Karaman
- Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences- Mehmet Akif Inan Education and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Gezer
- Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences- Mehmet Akif Inan Education and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey
| | - Yahya Kemal Icen
- Department of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences - Adana Health Practice and Research Center, Adana, Turkey
| | - Fatih Sahiner
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Gulhane Medical Faculty, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nevola KT, Nagarajan A, Hinton AC, Trajanoska K, Formosa MM, Xuereb-Anastasi A, van der Velde N, Stricker BH, Rivadeneira F, Fuggle NR, Westbury LD, Dennison EM, Cooper C, Kiel DP, Motyl KJ, Lary CW. Pharmacogenomic Effects of β-Blocker Use on Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density. J Endocr Soc 2021; 5:bvab092. [PMID: 34195528 PMCID: PMC8237849 DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvab092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Recent studies have shown that β-blocker (BB) users have a decreased risk of fracture and higher bone mineral density (BMD) compared to nonusers, likely due to the suppression of adrenergic signaling in osteoblasts, leading to increased BMD. There is also variability in the effect size of BB use on BMD in humans, which may be due to pharmacogenomic effects. OBJECTIVE To investigate potential single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) associated with the effect of BB use on femoral neck BMD, we performed a cross-sectional analysis using clinical data, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and genetic data from the Framingham Heart Study's (FHS) Offspring Cohort. We then sought to validate our top 4 genetic findings using data from the Rotterdam Study, the BPROOF Study, the Malta Osteoporosis Fracture Study (MOFS), and the Hertfordshire Cohort Study. METHODS We used sex-stratified linear mixed models to determine SNVs that had a significant interaction effect with BB use on femoral neck (FN) BMD across 11 gene regions. We also evaluated the association of our top SNVs from the FHS with microRNA (miRNA) expression in blood and identified potential miRNA-mediated mechanisms by which these SNVs may affect FN BMD. RESULTS One variation (rs11124190 in HDAC4) was validated in females using data from the Rotterdam Study, while another (rs12414657 in ADRB1) was validated in females using data from the MOFS. We performed an exploratory meta-analysis of all 5 studies for these variations, which further validated our findings. CONCLUSION This analysis provides a starting point for investigating the pharmacogenomic effects of BB use on BMD measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathleen T Nevola
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Archana Nagarajan
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Portland, ME 04101, USA
| | - Alexandra C Hinton
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Portland, ME 04101, USA
| | - Katerina Trajanoska
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands
| | - Melissa M Formosa
- Department of Applied Biomedical Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida MSD 2080, Malta
- Centre for Molecular Medicine and Biobanking, MSD 2080, Malta
| | - Angela Xuereb-Anastasi
- Department of Applied Biomedical Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida MSD 2080, Malta
- Centre for Molecular Medicine and Biobanking, MSD 2080, Malta
| | - Nathalie van der Velde
- Department of Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, the Netherlands
| | - Bruno H Stricker
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands
| | - Fernando Rivadeneira
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands
| | - Nicholas R Fuggle
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Leo D Westbury
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Elaine M Dennison
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Douglas P Kiel
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA 02131, USA
| | - Katherine J Motyl
- Center for Molecular Medicine, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Maine Medical Center, Scarborough, ME 04074, USA
| | - Christine W Lary
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Portland, ME 04101, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Haider A, Bengs S, Schade K, Wijnen WJ, Portmann A, Etter D, Fröhlich S, Warnock GI, Treyer V, Burger IA, Fiechter M, Kudura K, Fuchs TA, Pazhenkottil AP, Buechel RR, Kaufmann PA, Meisel A, Stolzmann P, Gebhard C. Myocardial 18F-FDG Uptake Pattern for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification in Patients Undergoing Oncologic PET/CT. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9072279. [PMID: 32709049 PMCID: PMC7408629 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 07/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxy-glucose (18F-FDG-PET/CT) has become the standard staging modality in various tumor entities. Cancer patients frequently receive cardio-toxic therapies. However, routine cardiovascular assessment in oncologic patients is not performed in current clinical practice. Accordingly, this study sought to assess whether myocardial 18F-FDG uptake patterns of patients undergoing oncologic PET/CT can be used for cardiovascular risk stratification. Methods: Myocardial 18F-FDG uptake pattern was assessed in 302 patients undergoing both oncologic whole-body 18F-FDG-PET/CT and myocardial perfusion imaging by single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT-MPI) within a six-month period. Primary outcomes were myocardial 18F-FDG uptake pattern, impaired myocardial perfusion, ongoing ischemia, myocardial scar, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Results: Among all patients, 109 (36.1%) displayed no myocardial 18F-FDG uptake, 77 (25.5%) showed diffuse myocardial 18F-FDG uptake, 24 (7.9%) showed focal 18F-FDG uptake, and 92 (30.5%) had a focal on diffuse myocardial 18F-FDG uptake pattern. In contrast to the other uptake patterns, focal myocardial 18F-FDG uptake was predominantly observed in patients with myocardial abnormalities (i.e., abnormal perfusion, impaired LVEF, myocardial ischemia, or scar). Accordingly, a multivariate logistic regression identified focal myocardial 18F-FDG uptake as a strong predictor of abnormal myocardial function/perfusion (odds ratio (OR) 5.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.73–16.34, p = 0.003). Similarly, focal myocardial 18F-FDG uptake was an independent predictor of ongoing ischemia and myocardial scar (OR 4.17, 95% CI 1.53–11.4, p = 0.005 and OR 3.78, 95% CI 1.47–9.69, p = 0.006, respectively). Conclusions: Focal myocardial 18F-FDG uptake seen on oncologic PET/CT indicates a significantly increased risk for multiple myocardial abnormalities. Obtaining and taking this information into account will help to stratify patients according to risk and will reduce unnecessary cardiovascular complications in cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Haider
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
- Correspondence:
| | - Susan Bengs
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
| | - Katharina Schade
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
| | - Winandus J. Wijnen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
| | - Angela Portmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
| | - Dominik Etter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
| | - Sandro Fröhlich
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
| | - Geoffrey I. Warnock
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
| | - Valerie Treyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
| | - Irene A. Burger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
| | - Michael Fiechter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
- Swiss Paraplegic Center, 6207 Nottwil, Switzerland
| | - Ken Kudura
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
| | - Tobias A. Fuchs
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
| | - Aju P. Pazhenkottil
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
| | - Ronny R. Buechel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
| | - Philipp A. Kaufmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
| | - Alexander Meisel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
| | - Paul Stolzmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
| | - Catherine Gebhard
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; (S.B.); (K.S.); (W.J.W.); (A.P.); (D.E.); (S.F.); (G.I.W.); (V.T.); (I.A.B.); (M.F.); (K.K.); (T.A.F.); (A.P.P.); (R.R.B.); (P.A.K.); (A.M.); (P.S.); (C.G.)
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|