The Role of Cardiac MRI in Patients with Troponin-Positive Chest Pain and Unobstructed Coronary Arteries

Early versus late cardiac magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is responsible for about 10% of all acute myocardial infarctions (AMI). Therapeutic strategies and prognosis depend on the underlying etiology, and a multimodal approach is essential. The objectives of this study were to characterize the group of patients diagnosed with MINOCA and to valuate the diagnostic yield of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational, and analytical study, including 516 patients admitted for a non-ST-elevation MI and with no significant coronary disease on coronary angiography between January 2016 and September 2021.

RESULTS

After the inclusion criteria, 163 patients remained of the 516 admitted to the study. They were divided into four groups based on the CMR results: MINOCA (n=51), Takotsubo syndrome (n=37), myocarditis (n=33), and without diagnosis (n=42). Most patients diagnosed with MINOCA were female with a mean age of 61.06±13.83 years. CMR identified the diagnosis in 74.2% of patients admitted for suspected acute MI, in which coronary angiography showed the absence of significant obstructions. The median time between hospital admission and CMR was significantly shorter in the groups that had a diagnosis compared with the group with no diagnosis (p=0.038), with a significant increase in diagnostic profitability if CMR was performed up to 14 days after admission (p=0.022). There were no deaths of cardiovascular etiology during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

CMR was fundamental as it identified the diagnosis in three out of four patients; it should be performed in the first 14 days.

Infarct-like versus Non-Infarct-like Clinical Presentation of Acute Myocarditis: Comparison of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) Findings

BACKGROUND

The clinical presentation of acute myocarditis (AM) is widely variable, ranging from a subclinical disease to an infarct-like syndrome. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has become the reference non-invasive diagnostic tool for suspected AM, allowing the identification of the various hallmarks of myocardial inflammation (edema, fibrosis, and hyperemia). The aim of the study was to investigate any differences in morphological, functional, and tissue characterization CMR parameters between infarct-like AM in patients with unobstructed coronary arteries and non-infarct-like AM, diagnosed according to the original Lake-Louise Criteria (LLC); Methods: We retrospectively selected 39 patients diagnosed with AM according to LLC, divided into 2 groups according to the clinical presentation: infarct-like in group 1 patients and non-infarct-like in group 2 patients. CMR morphologic, functional, and tissue characterization parameters were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

In group 1, CMR tissue characterization parameters were mainly altereda in septal location with mesocardial myocardial involvement; in group 2, CMR tissue characterization parameters were mainly altered in a lateral location with subepicardial myocardial involvement mainly at the mid-cavity. No significant differences in morphological or functional parameters were observed between the two study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed differences in the localization and distribution of myocardial tissue damage assessed by CMR among forms of AM accompanied by an infarct-like clinical presentation compared with non-infarct-like presentations of AM. The mechanisms underlying the different preferential sites of damage observed in our study are not known, and we do not exclude the possibility of their prognostic implications.

Myocarditis in the forensic setting - a review of the literature

Diagnosis of myocarditis as the cause of death at post-mortem is currently determined by a forensic pathologist. There is no systematic method for diagnosis and thus the determination is subject to inter-observer variability and is non-reproducible. Postmortem studies often rely on the clinical method of diagnosis, which is inaccurate. Furthermore, there is no current standardized method of distinguishing between myocarditis as cause of death, and myocardial inflammation as an incidental finding post-mortem. Only a few studies have investigated a method of quantifying this difference using variables such as number of inflammatory cells and presence of myocyte necrosis, however, there are several limitations hindering the reproducibility of this research. This review investigates the current practices and limitations associated with the diagnosis of myocarditis as cause of death in the autopsy setting.

Contemporary Risk Stratification of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Chest pain is one of the most common presenting concerns of patients seeking care in the emergency department, and the underlying etiology can range from acute coronary syndrome to various other non-cardiac causes. Initial evaluation should focus on characterizing symptoms and identifying risk factors, but further risk stratification using clinical decision pathways and biomarkers (cardiac troponin) is essential. The 2021 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain represent the first ever guidelines for the evaluation of patients with acute chest pain. The contemporary risk stratification methods described in these guidelines allow for the identification of patient subgroups: patients who do not require further testing, patients who should proceed directly to the cath lab, and patients who will benefit from further anatomic or functional testing. In this review, we describe contemporary risk stratification methods for acute coronary syndrome and summarize the recommendations put forth by the guidelines.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a patient with recent COVID-19 infection: A case report

We report a spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) case in a lady with a history of recent COVID-19 and without any known predisposing factors. We also highlight the value of CMR as a noninvasive tool for tissue characterization, which can also be more applicable during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Appropriateness criteria for the use of cardiac computed tomography, SIC-SIRM part 2: acute chest pain evaluation; stent and coronary artery bypass graft patency evaluation; planning of coronary revascularization and transcatheter valve procedures; cardiomyopathies, electrophysiological applications, cardiac masses, cardio-oncology and pericardial diseases evaluation

In the past 20 years, cardiac computed tomography (CCT) has become a pivotal technique for the noninvasive diagnostic workup of coronary and cardiac diseases. Continuous technical and methodological improvements, combined with fast growing scientific evidence, have progressively expanded the clinical role of CCT. Randomized clinical trials documented the value of CCT in increasing the cost-effectiveness of the management of patients with acute chest pain presenting in the emergency department, also during the pandemic. Beyond the evaluation of stents and surgical graft patency, the anatomical and functional coronary imaging have the potential to guide treatment decision-making and planning for complex left main and three-vessel coronary disease. Furthermore, there has been an increasing demand to use CCT for preinterventional planning in minimally invasive procedures, such as transcatheter valve implantation and mitral valve repair. Yet, the use of CCT as a roadmap for tailored electrophysiological procedures has gained increasing importance to assure maximum success. In the meantime, innovations and advanced postprocessing tools have generated new potential applications of CCT from the simple coronary anatomy to the complete assessment of structural, functional and pathophysiological biomarkers of cardiac disease. In this complex and revolutionary scenario, it is urgently needed to provide an updated guide for the appropriate use of CCT in different clinical settings. This manuscript, endorsed by the Italian Society of Cardiology (SIC) and the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), represents the second of two consensus documents collecting the expert opinion of cardiologists and radiologists about current appropriate use of CCT.

Rare Coronary Embolism Secondary to Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation

The diagnosis and management of myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) are difficult due to its variable presentations, different causes, and challenging diagnostic approaches. Cardiac imaging modalities including cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) are very useful tools for diagnosing and managing MINOCA. Myocardial infarction (MI) can be caused by coronary emboli that can be contributed to atrial fibrillation (AF). Rarely, coronary embolism with resultant MINOCA can occur after direct current cardioversion (DCCV) even in fully anticoagulated patients. We present a rare case of a coronary embolism following DCCV as well as a CMR finding of microvascular obstruction (MVO), which has not previously been reported after DCCV. This case also emphasizes the value of obtaining a CMR for patients with MINOCA.

The Pivotal Role of Echocardiography in the Diagnosis of Stress-Induced Cardiomyopathy Presenting with a Typical Pattern in Critically Ill Children. An Illustrative Case Report

BACKGROUND

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM) has some distinctive features like greater proportion of reverse-TCM and disease of central nervous system as a prevalent triggering cause. We expose the case of a child with cardiogenic shock presenting an atypical echocardiographic TCM pattern on echocardiography, after an acute neurologic trigger. We also include a systematic review of the literature of previously described cases of atypical-TCM in children.

CASE REPORT

A previously healthy 9 year-old boy with status epilepticus who presented abrupt cardiogenic shock. The EKG showed signs of myocardial ischemia, cardiac biomarkers NT-proBNP (2756 pg/mL ) and Troponin I (1707 pg/mL ) were raised, and echocardiography exposed a dilated LV with severely reduced systolic function (LVEF 28%) along with hypokinetic mid-basal segments (circumferential ballooning) and preserved hypercontractile apical segments, with normal origin of both coronary arterial systems. A presumptive diagnosis of "reverse", "inverse" or atypical Takotsubo cardiomyopathy was build based on the echocardiographic findings, apart from the ACS-like EKG findings, the raised cardiac biomarkers and the neurological trigger of the hypercatecholaminergic state. Despite cardiovascular improvement with supportive treatment, the patient eventually expired on day 2 after PICU admission due to neurological complications. As shown in our systematic review, only 19 similar cases have been reported to date.

CONCLUSION

With the report of this unusual case, we aim to point out the fundamental role of bedside echocardiography as diagnostic test for critically ill children presenting with ACS-like in the context of neurosurgical emergencies, where bedside echocardiography itself can accurately establish a presumptive diagnosis of TCM.

2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

This clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain provides recommendations and algorithms for clinicians to assess and diagnose chest pain in adult patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from November 11, 2017, to May 1, 2020, encompassing randomized and nonrandomized trials, observational studies, registries, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through April 2021, were also considered.

STRUCTURE

Chest pain is a frequent cause for emergency department visits in the United States. The "2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain" provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence on the assessment and evaluation of chest pain. This guideline presents an evidence-based approach to risk stratification and the diagnostic workup for the evaluation of chest pain. Cost-value considerations in diagnostic testing have been incorporated, and shared decision-making with patients is recommended.

Myocardial Late Contrast Enhancement CT in Troponin-Positive Acute Chest Pain Syndrome

Background Acute chest pain with mild troponin rise and inconclusive diagnosis after clinical evaluation represents a diagnostic challenge. Triple-rule-out (TRO) CT may exclude coronary artery disease (CAD), as well as acute aortic syndrome and pulmonary embolism, but cannot help identify other causes of myocardial injury. Purpose To investigate the diagnostic value of a comprehensive CT protocol including both an angiographic and a late contrast enhancement (LCE) scan in participants with troponin-positive acute chest pain. Materials and Methods In this prospective study, consecutive patients with troponin-positive acute chest pain or anginal equivalent and inconclusive diagnosis after clinical evaluation (symptoms, markers, electrocardiography, and echocardiography) who underwent TRO CT between June 2018 and September 2020 were enrolled. TRO CT was performed to evaluate the presence of obstructive CAD (stenosis ≥50%), acute aortic syndrome, and pulmonary embolism. If the findings on the TRO CT scan were negative, an LCE CT scan was acquired after 10 minutes to assess the presence and pattern of scar and quantify the myocardial extracellular volume fraction. CT-based diagnoses were compared with diagnoses obtained with reference standard methods, including invasive coronary angiography, cardiac MRI, and endomyocardial biopsy. Results Eighty-four patients (median age, 69 years [interquartile range, 50-77 years]; 45 men) were enrolled. TRO CT helped identify obstructive CAD in 35 participants (42%), acute aortic syndrome in one (1.2%), and pulmonary embolism in six (7.1%). LCE CT scans were acquired in the remaining 42 participants. The following diagnoses were reached with use of LCE CT: myocarditis (22 of 42 participants [52%]), takotsubo cardiomyopathy (four of 42 [10%]), amyloidosis (three of 42 [7.1%]), myocardial infarction with nonobstructed coronary arteries (three of 42 [7.1%]), dilated cardiomyopathy (two of 42 [4.8%]), and negative or inconclusive findings (eight of 42 [19%]). The addition of LCE CT improved the diagnostic rate of TRO CT from 42 of 84 participants (50% [95% CI: 38.9, 61.1]) to 76 of 84 (90% [95% CI: 82.1, 95.8]) (P < .001). Conclusion A CT protocol including triple-rule-out and late contrast enhancement CT scans improved diagnostic rate in participants presenting with acute chest pain syndrome. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Nagpal and Bluemke in this issue.

2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

This clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain provides recommendations and algorithms for clinicians to assess and diagnose chest pain in adult patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from November 11, 2017, to May 1, 2020, encompassing randomized and nonrandomized trials, observational studies, registries, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through April 2021, were also considered.

STRUCTURE

Chest pain is a frequent cause for emergency department visits in the United States. The "2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain" provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence on the assessment and evaluation of chest pain. This guideline presents an evidence-based approach to risk stratification and the diagnostic workup for the evaluation of chest pain. Cost-value considerations in diagnostic testing have been incorporated, and shared decision-making with patients is recommended.

2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

This clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain provides recommendations and algorithms for clinicians to assess and diagnose chest pain in adult patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from November 11, 2017, to May 1, 2020, encompassing randomized and nonrandomized trials, observational studies, registries, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Collaboration, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reports, and other relevant databases. Additional relevant studies, published through April 2021, were also considered. Structure: Chest pain is a frequent cause for emergency department visits in the United States. The "2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR Guideline for the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Chest Pain" provides recommendations based on contemporary evidence on the assessment and evaluation of chest pain. This guideline presents an evidence-based approach to risk stratification and the diagnostic workup for the evaluation of chest pain. Cost-value considerations in diagnostic testing have been incorporated, and shared decision-making with patients is recommended.

The evolving role of cardiac imaging in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries

Myocardial infarction (MI) with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) represents a heterogeneous clinical conundrum accounting for about 6%-8% of all acute MI who are referred for coronary angiography. Current guidelines and consensus documents recommend that these patients are appropriately diagnosed, uncovering the causes of MINOCA, so that specific therapies can be prescribed. Indeed, there are a variety of causes that can result in this clinical condition, and for this reason diagnostic cardiac imaging has an emerging critical role in the assessment of patients with suspected or confirmed MINOCA. In last years, different cardiac imaging techniques have been evaluated in this context, and the comprehension of their strengths and limitations is of the utmost importance for their effective use in clinical practice. Moreover, recent evidence is clearly suggesting that a multimodality cardiac imaging approach, combining different techniques, seems to be crucial for a proper management of MINOCA. However, great variability still exists in clinical practice in the management of patients with suspected MINOCA, also depending on the availability of diagnostic tools and local expertise. Herein, we review the current knowledge supporting the use of different cardiac imaging techniques in patients with MINOCA, underscoring the importance of a comprehensive multimodality cardiac imaging approach and proposing a practical diagnostic algorithm to properly identify and treat the specific causes of MINOCA, in order to improve prognosis and the quality of life in these patients.

Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries

BACKGROUND

It is estimated that 5% to 10% of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) present with no obstructive coronary artery lesions. Until now, most studies have focused on acute coronary syndrome, including different clinical entities with a similar presentation encompassed under the term MINOCA (MI with non-obstructive coronary arteries). The aim of this study is to assess the prognosis of patients diagnosed with true infarction, confirmed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), in the absence of significant coronary lesions.

METHODS

Prospective multicenter registry study, including 120 consecutive patients with a CMR-confirmed MI without obstructive coronary artery lesions. The primary clinical outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: death, non-fatal infarction, stroke, or cardiac readmission), assessed over three years.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients (63.3%) were admitted with a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome, and 44 (36.6%) for other causes (mainly heart failure); the definitive diagnosis was established by CMR. Most patients (64.2%) were men, and the mean age was 58.8 ± 13.5 years. Patients presented with small infarcts: 83 (69.1%) showed late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in one or two myocardial segments, mainly transmural (in 77.5% of patients) and with a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (median 54.8%, interquartile range 37-62). The most frequent infarct location was inferolateral (n = 38, 31.7%). During follow-up, 43 patients (35.8%) experienced a MACE, including 9 (7.5%) who died. In multivariable analysis, LGE in two versus one myocardial segment doubled the risk of adverse cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR] 2.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-5.83, p = 0.058). Involvement of three or more myocardial segments almost tripled the risk (HR 2.71, 95% CI 1.04-7.04, p = 0.040 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with true MI but without significant coronary artery lesions predominantly had small infarcts. Myocardial 3-segment LGE involvement is associated with a significantly higher risk of adverse cardiac events.

Inference of ventricular activation properties from non-invasive electrocardiography

The realisation of precision cardiology requires novel techniques for the non-invasive characterisation of individual patients’ cardiac function to inform therapeutic and diagnostic decision-making. Both electrocardiography and imaging are used for the clinical diagnosis of cardiac disease. The integration of multi-modal datasets through advanced computational methods could enable the development of the cardiac ‘digital twin’, a comprehensive virtual tool that mechanistically reveals a patient's heart condition from clinical data and simulates treatment outcomes. The adoption of cardiac digital twins requires the non-invasive efficient personalisation of the electrophysiological properties in cardiac models. This study develops new computational techniques to estimate key ventricular activation properties for individual subjects by exploiting the synergy between non-invasive electrocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and modelling and simulation. More precisely, we present an efficient sequential Monte Carlo approximate Bayesian computation-based inference method, integrated with Eikonal simulations and torso-biventricular models constructed based on clinical CMR imaging. The method also includes a novel strategy to treat combined continuous (conduction speeds) and discrete (earliest activation sites) parameter spaces and an efficient dynamic time warping-based ECG comparison algorithm. We demonstrate results from our inference method on a cohort of twenty virtual subjects with cardiac ventricular myocardial-mass volumes ranging from 74 cm³ to 171 cm³ and considering low versus high resolution for the endocardial discretisation (which determines possible locations of the earliest activation sites). Results show that our method can successfully infer the ventricular activation properties in sinus rhythm from non-invasive epicardial activation time maps and ECG recordings, achieving higher accuracy for the endocardial speed and sheet (transmural) speed than for the fibre or sheet-normal directed speeds.

•

Estimation of the ventricular speeds and earliest activation sites from ECG and CMR.

•

Evaluation with twenty virtual subjects shows the effect of anatomical variability.

•

Bayesian-inspired simultaneous estimation of continuous and discrete parameters.

•

Efficient dynamic time warping-based comparison of electrocardiograms (ECG).

•

Changing fibre and sheet-normal speed does not affect healthy activation sequence.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in women with cardiovascular disease: position statement from the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR)

This document is a position statement from the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) on recommendations for clinical utilization of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in women with cardiovascular disease. The document was prepared by the SCMR Consensus Group on CMR Imaging for Female Patients with Cardiovascular Disease and endorsed by the SCMR Publications Committee and SCMR Executive Committee. The goals of this document are to (1) guide the informed selection of cardiovascular imaging methods, (2) inform clinical decision-making, (3) educate stakeholders on the advantages of CMR in specific clinical scenarios, and (4) empower patients with clinical evidence to participate in their clinical care. The statements of clinical utility presented in the current document pertain to the following clinical scenarios: acute coronary syndrome, stable ischemic heart disease, peripartum cardiomyopathy, cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction, aortic syndrome and congenital heart disease in pregnancy, bicuspid aortic valve and aortopathies, systemic rheumatic diseases and collagen vascular disorders, and cardiomyopathy-causing mutations. The authors cite published evidence when available and provide expert consensus otherwise. Most of the evidence available pertains to translational studies involving subjects of both sexes. However, the authors have prioritized review of data obtained from female patients, and direct comparison of CMR between women and men. This position statement does not consider CMR accessibility or availability of local expertise, but instead highlights the optimal utilization of CMR in women with known or suspected cardiovascular disease. Finally, the ultimate goal of this position statement is to improve the health of female patients with cardiovascular disease by providing specific recommendations on the use of CMR.

Cardiac MRI in Patients with Acute Chest Pain

Acute chest pain is a common reason for visits to the emergency department. It is important to distinguish among the various causes of acute chest pain, because treatment and prognosis are substantially different among the various conditions. It is critical to exclude acute coronary syndrome (ACS), which is a major cause of hospitalization, death, and health care costs worldwide. Myocardial ischemia is defined as potential myocyte death secondary to an imbalance between oxygen supply and demand due to obstruction of an epicardial coronary artery. Unobstructed coronary artery disease can have cardiac causes (eg, myocarditis, myocardial infarction with nonobstructed coronary arteries, and Takotsubo cardiomyopathy), and noncardiac diseases can manifest with acute chest pain and increased serum cardiac biomarker levels. In the emergency department, cardiac MRI may aid in the identification of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina or ACS with unobstructed coronary artery disease, if the patient's clinical history is known to be atypical. Also, cardiac MRI is excellent for risk stratification of patients for adverse left ventricular remodeling or major adverse cardiac events. Cardiac MRI should be performed early in the course of the disease (<2 weeks after onset of symptoms). Steady-state free-precession T2-weighted MRI with late gadolinium enhancement is the mainstay of the cardiac MRI protocol. Further sequences can be used to analyze the different pathophysiologic subjacent mechanisms of the disease, such as microvascular obstruction or intramyocardial hemorrhage. Finally, cardiac MRI may provide several prognostic biomarkers that help in follow-up of these patients. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2020.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging features prognostic information in patients with suspected myocardial infarction with non-obstructed coronary arteries

BACKGROUND

To assess the prognostic implications of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with clinical suspicion of myocardial infarction with non-obstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA).

METHODS

A total of 145 patients (58 ± 15 years, 97 men) were retrospectively enrolled in this single-center, longitudinal observational study. All patients underwent CMR including cine, edema-sensitive, and late gadolinium enhancement acquisitions, within a median of 3 days after cardiac catheterization. Follow-up was performed by medical records chart review and phone interviews; the median follow-up time was 4.2 years. The primary endpoint was defined as a combination of death, stroke, new onset of congestive heart failure, recurrent hospitalization, or the need for an invasive cardiac procedure.

RESULTS

In 143 (98.6%) cases, CMR revealed the following cardiac pathologies: myocarditis (n = 48, 33.1%), structural cardiomyopathies (n = 40, 27.6%), "true" myocardial infarction (n = 22, 15.1%), hypertensive heart disease (n = 19, 13.1%), and Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy (n = 14, 9.7%). Only two patients (1.4%) had a normal CMR examination. There were significant prognostic differences between different etiologies, e.g. myocarditis and Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy had a more favorable prognosis then structural cardiomyopathies. Age, end-diastolic volume index and time-to-CMR showed significant association with the primary endpoint in multi-variate Cox regression.

CONCLUSIONS

CMR performed early after the onset of clinical symptoms allows discrimination between acute myocardial injury from "true" MINOCA in patients presenting with chest pain and elevated cardiac biomarkers, thereby helping to identify the underlying pathology in suspected MINOCA and allowing risk stratification based on the established diagnosis. Furthermore, CMR parameters allow for improved prediction of adverse events compared to clinical and laboratory parameters.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for tissue characterization after acute myocardial injury

The annual incidence of hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction lies between 90 and 312 per 100 000 inhabitants in Europe. Despite advances in patient care 1 year mortality after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains around 10%. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has emerged as a robust imaging modality for assessing patients after acute myocardial injury. In addition to accurate assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes, CMR offers the unique ability of visualization of myocardial injury through a variety of imaging techniques such as late gadolinium enhancement and T2-weighted imaging. Furthermore, new parametric mapping techniques allow accurate quantification of myocardial injury and are currently being exploited in large trials aiming to augment risk management and treatment of STEMI patients. Of interest, CMR enables the detection of microvascular injury (MVI) which occurs in approximately 40% of STEMI patients and is a major independent predictor of mortality and heart failure. In this article, we review traditional and novel CMR techniques used for myocardial tissue characterization after acute myocardial injury, including the detection and quantification of MVI. Moreover, we discuss clinical scenarios of acute myocardial injury in which the tissue characterization techniques can be applied and we provide proposed imaging protocols tailored to each scenario.

Cardiovascular disease in women: insights from magnetic resonance imaging

The presentation and identification of cardiovascular disease in women pose unique diagnostic challenges compared to men, and underrecognized conditions in this patient population may lead to clinical mismanagement.This article reviews the sex differences in cardiovascular disease, explores the diagnostic and prognostic role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in the spectrum of cardiovascular disorders in women, and proposes the added value of CMR compared to other imaging modalities. In addition, this article specifically reviews the role of CMR in cardiovascular diseases occurring more frequently or exclusively in female patients, including Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, connective tissue disorders, primary pulmonary arterial hypertension and peripartum cardiomyopathy. Gaps in knowledge and opportunities for further investigation of sex-specific cardiovascular differences by CMR are also highlighted.

Troponin-Positive Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries and Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: Definition, Etiologies, and Role of CT and MR Imaging

In approximately 10% of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), angiography does not reveal an obstructive coronary stenosis. This is known as myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA), which has complex and multifactorial causes. However, this term can be confusing and open to dual interpretation, because MINOCA is also used to describe patients with acute myocardial injury caused by ischemia-related myocardial necrosis. Therefore, with regards to this specific context of MINOCA, the generic term for MINOCA should be replaced with troponin-positive with non-obstructive coronary arteries (TpNOCA). The causes of TpNOCA can be subcategorized into epicardial coronary (causes of MINOCA), myocardial, and extracardiac disorders. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can confirm MI and differentiate various myocardial causes, while cardiac computed tomography is useful to diagnose the extracardiac causes.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chest Pain-Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome

Chest pain is a frequent cause for emergency department visits and inpatient evaluation, with particular concern for acute coronary syndrome as an etiology, since cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. Although history-based, electrocardiographic, and laboratory evaluations have shown promise in identifying coronary artery disease, early accurate diagnosis is paramount and there is an important role for imaging examinations to determine the presence and extent of anatomic coronary abnormality and ischemic physiology, to guide management with regard to optimal medical therapy or revascularization, and ultimately to thereby improve patient outcomes. A summary of the various methods for initial imaging evaluation of suspected acute coronary syndrome is outlined in this document. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Assessment and Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Acute Nonischemic Myocardial Injury

Although coronary thrombus overlying a disrupted atherosclerotic plaque has long been considered the hallmark and the primary therapeutic target for acute myocardial infarction (MI), multiple other mechanisms are now known to cause or contribute to MI. It is further recognized that an MI is just one of many types of acute myocardial injury. The Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction provides a taxonomy for acute myocardial injury, including 5 subtypes of MI and nonischemic myocardial injury. The diagnosis of MI is reserved for patients with myocardial ischemia as the cause of myocardial injury, whether attributable to acute atherothrombosis (type 1 MI) or supply/demand mismatch without acute atherothrombosis (type 2 MI). Myocardial injury in the absence of ischemia is categorized as acute or chronic nonischemic myocardial injury. However, optimal evaluation and treatment strategies for these etiologically distinct diagnoses have yet to be defined. Herein, we review the epidemiology, risk factor associations, and diagnostic tools that may assist in differentiating between nonischemic myocardial injury, type 1 MI, and type 2 MI. We identify limitations, review new research, and propose a framework for the diagnostic and therapeutic approach for patients who have suspected MI or other causes of myocardial injury.

Prognostic Role of CMR and Conventional Risk Factors in Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructed Coronary Arteries

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the prognostic impact of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and conventional risk factors in patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructed coronaries (MINOCA).

BACKGROUND

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructed coronary arteries (MINOCA) represents a diagnostic dilemma, and the prognostic markers have not been clarified.

METHODS

A total of 388 consecutive patients with MINOCA undergoing CMR assessment were identified retrospectively from a registry database and prospectively followed for a primary clinical endpoint of all-cause mortality. A 1.5-T CMR was performed using a comprehensive protocol (cines, T2-weighted, and late gadolinium enhancement sequences). Patients were grouped into 4 categories based on their CMR findings: myocardial infarction (MI) (embolic/spontaneous recanalization), myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, and normal CMR.

RESULTS

CMR (performed at a median of 37 days from presentation) was able to identify the cause for the troponin rise in 74% of the patients (25% myocarditis, 25% MI, and 25% cardiomyopathy), whereas a normal CMR was identified in 26%. Over a median follow-up of 1,262 days (3.5 years), 5.7% patients died. The cardiomyopathy group had the worst prognosis (mortality 15%; log-rank test: 19.9; p < 0.001), MI had 4% mortality, and 2% in both myocarditis and normal CMR. In a multivariable Cox regression model (including clinical and CMR parameters), CMR diagnosis of cardiomyopathy and ST-segment elevation on presentation electrocardiogram (ECG) remained the only 2 significant predictors of mortality. Using presentation with ECG ST-segment elevation and CMR diagnosis of cardiomyopathy as risk markers, the mortality risk rates were 2%, 11%, and 21% for presence of 0, 1, and 2 factors, respectively (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of patients with MINOCA, CMR (median 37 days from presentation) identified a final diagnosis in 74% of patients. Cardiomyopathy had the highest mortality, followed by MI. The strongest predictors of mortality were a CMR diagnosis of cardiomyopathy and ST-segment elevation on presentation ECG.

Approximation of the Incidence of Myocarditis by Systematic Screening With Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to obtain an approximation of the true incidence of myocarditis by systematic screening of patients at risk using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in a tertiary care center.

BACKGROUND

Underdiagnosis of myocarditis and resulting uncertainty about its incidence remain a clinical dilemma. The authors hypothesized that systematic screening of patients presenting with angina-like symptoms, elevated troponin T, and no significant coronary artery disease using CMR will provide an approximation of the true incidence of myocarditis.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective chart review of patients presenting with angina-like symptoms and elevated high-sensitivity troponin T (TnT-hs ≥14 ng/l) in 2015 and 2016. During the year 2015, only patients with elevated TnT-hs, no significant coronary artery disease, and moderate-to-high clinical likelihood of myocarditis underwent CMR. Starting in 2016, CMR was obtained in patients with similar presentation, but independent of clinical likelihood of myocarditis.

RESULTS

A total of 1,788 patients (74% male, age 69 ± 14 years) qualified for our analysis. In 2015, 521 patients presented with angina-like symptoms and TnT-hs elevation. In 2016, the number increased to 1,267 patients. Although in the year 2015, a total of 4 of 88 (5%) CMRs were positive for myocarditis, the percentage of positive CMRs doubled (26 of 199; 13%; p = 0.03) in 2016.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel diagnostic screening algorithm led to a 6.3-fold increase of the incidence of myocarditis in our hospital. Furthermore, the percentage of CMRs positive for myocarditis doubled, supporting the diagnostic value of this method. Considering the potentially lethal adverse events of myocarditis if left untreated, we recommend a low threshold for the use of CMR in patients with angina-like symptoms and elevated TnT-hs after exclusion of coronary artery disease.

Diagnostic performance of image navigated coronary CMR angiography in patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

The use of coronary MR angiography (CMRA) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains limited due to the long scan times, unpredictable and often non-diagnostic image quality secondary to respiratory motion artifacts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate CMRA with image-based respiratory navigation (iNAV CMRA) and compare it to gold standard invasive x-ray coronary angiography in patients with CAD.

METHODS

Consecutive patients referred for CMR assessment were included to undergo iNAV CMRA on a 1.5 T scanner. Coronary vessel sharpness and a visual score were assigned to the coronary arteries. A diagnostic reading was performed on the iNAV CMRA data, where a lumen narrowing >50% was considered diseased. This was compared to invasive x-ray findings.

RESULTS

Image-navigated CMRA was performed in 31 patients (77% male, 56 ± 14 years). The iNAV CMRA scan time was 7 min:21 s ± 0 min:28 s. Out of a possible 279 coronary segments, 26 segments were excluded from analysis due to stents or diameter less than 1.5 mm, resulting in a total of 253 coronary segments. Diagnostic image quality was obtained for 98% of proximal coronary segments, 94% of middle segments, and 91% of distal coronary segments. The sensitivity and specificity was 86% and 83% per patient, 80% and 92% per vessel and 73% and 95% per segment.

CONCLUSION

In this study, iNAV CMRA offered a very good diagnostic performance when compared against invasive x-ray angiography. Due to the short and predictable scan time it can add clinical value as a part of a comprehensive CAD assessment protocol.

The unique value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome and culprit-free coronary angiograms

Background

Patients with chest pain, elevated troponin, and unobstructed coronary disease present a clinical dilemma. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incremental diagnostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in a cohort of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and unobstructed coronary arteries.

Results

Data files of patients meeting the inclusion criteria in two cardiology centres were searched and analysed. The inclusion criteria included: 1) thoracic pain suspected with ACS; 2) a significant increase in the high-sensitive Troponin T value; 3) ECG changes; 4) coronary arteries without any significant stenosis; 5) a CMR examination included in the diagnostic process; 6) an uncertain diagnosis before the CMR exam; and 7) the absence of known CMR and contrast media contraindications. Special attention was paid to the benefits of CMR in determining the final diagnosis.

In total, 136 patients who underwent coronary angiography for chest pain were analysed. The most frequent underlying causes were myocarditis (38%) and perimyocarditis (18%), followed by angiographically unrecognised acute myocardial infarction (18%) and Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (15%). The final diagnosis remained unclear in 6% of the patients. The contribution of CMR in determining the final diagnosis determination was crucial in 57% of the patients. In another 35% of the patients, CMR confirmed the suspicion and, only 8% of the CMR examinations did not help at all and had no influence on diagnosis or treatment.

Conclusion

CMR provided a powerful incremental diagnostic value in the cohort of patients with suspected ACS and unobstructed coronary arteries. CMR is highly recommended to be incorporated as an inalienable part of the diagnostic algorithms in these patients.

Yield of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

PURPOSE

Ten percent to 25% of women and 6%-10% of men with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are found to have no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) on coronary computed tomography angiogram or invasive coronary angiography. The etiology of presentation is often unclear. We examined the diagnostic yield of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of an ACS and no obstructive CAD.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of an ACS and no obstructive CAD on coronary computed tomography angiogram or invasive coronary angiography who had CMR performed at St. Paul's Hospital, British Columbia, Canada, from 2013 to 2015. No obstructive CAD was defined as <50% stenosis in any epicardial artery. We compared CMR diagnostic yield in troponin-positive and troponin-negative patients and determined the etiology of presentation in each category. We also examined gender differences.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients met inclusion criteria. The average age was 55.8 years, 70% were female, and 60% were troponin positive upon presentation. Abnormal CMR was observed in 35.7% of patients, yielding a diagnosis in 27.9% of females and 53.5% of males (P = 0.02). Troponin-positive patients had a significantly higher prevalence of an abnormal CMR than did troponin-negative patients (44.1% vs. 23.1%; P = 0.03). Myocarditis was more common in troponin-positive patients (25.4% vs. 2.6%; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Forty-four percent of patients with positive troponin and with signs and symptoms suggestive of an ACS, no obstructive CAD on invasive coronary angiography or coronary computed tomography angiogram, and unclear diagnosis had abnormalities on CMR that identified the diagnosis. CMR should be considered in patients with positive troponin values when the etiology for their presentation is unclear.

Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute and chronic ischemic heart disease

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a multi-parametric, multi-planar, non-invasive imaging technique, which allows accurate determination of biventricular function and precise myocardial tissue characterization in a one-stop-shop technique, free from the use of ionizing radiations. Though CMR has been increasingly applied over the last two decades in every-day clinical practice, its widest application has been in the assessment of ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Acute myocarditis following high-dose interleukin-2 treatment

We describe the case of a 49-year-old woman with metastatic renal carcinoma receiving treatment with high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) who developed acutely progressive dyspnea on exertion and an elevated troponin level. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was used to establish the diagnosis of IL-2-associated cardiotoxicity, differentiating myocarditis from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and preventing an unnecessary invasive coronary angiogram. <Learning objective: ACS and myocarditis can present with similar symptoms and elevation in troponin levels. For individuals that lack significant risk factors for coronary artery disease, cardiac CMR may be used to differentiate ACS from myocarditis and avoid unnecessary invasive testing.>.

Chest pain: coronary CT in the ER

Cardiac CT has developed into a robust clinical tool during the past 15 years. Of the fields in which the potential of cardiac CT has raised more interest is chest pain in acute settings. In fact, the possibility to exclude with high reliability obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients at low-to-intermediate risk is of great interest both from the clinical standpoint and from the management standpoint. Several other modalities, with or without imaging, have been used during the past decades in the settings of new onset chest pain or in acute chest pain for both diagnostic and prognostic assessment of CAD. Each one has advantages and disadvantages. Most imaging modalities also focus on inducible ischaemia to guide referral to invasive coronary angiography. The advent of cardiac CT has introduced a new practice diagnostic paradigm, being the most accurate non-invasive method for identification and exclusion of CAD. Furthermore, the detection of subclinical CAD and plaque imaging offer the opportunity to improve risk stratification. Moreover, recent advances of the latest generation CT scanners allow combining both anatomical and functional imaging by stress myocardial perfusion. The role of cardiac CT in acute settings is already important and will become progressively more important in the coming years.

How to approach the great mimic? Improving techniques for the diagnosis of myocarditis

Myocarditis is characterized by inflammation of the myocardium, assessed by histological, immunological and immunohistochemical criteria, due to exogenous or endogenous causes. Abnormal QRS, increased troponin T and left ventricular regional or global dysfunction may be detected. Strain Doppler echocardiography can detect longitudinal segmental dysfunction of the myocardium, due to edema, which is in agreement with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Nuclear imaging shows a good sensitivity, but carries serious limitations. Somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography seems promising. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, using T2-weighted, early T1-weighted, delayed enhanced images and recently T2 and T1 mapping, has the best diagnostic capability. Endomyocardial biopsy has further contributed to the etiologic diagnosis of myocarditis. To conclude, cardiac magnetic resonance and endomyocardial biopsy have both significantly increased our diagnostic performance. However, further assessment by multicenter studies is needed to establish a clinically useful algorithm.