Albumin use in bleeding cardiac surgical patients and associated patient outcomes

Perioperative fluid management: evidence-based consensus recommendations from the international multidisciplinary PeriOperative Quality Initiative

Fluid therapy is an integral component of perioperative management. In light of emerging evidence in this area, the Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) convened an international multiprofessional expert meeting to generate evidence-based consensus recommendations for fluid management in patients undergoing surgery. This article provides a summary of the recommendations for perioperative fluid management of surgical patients from the preoperative period until hospital discharge and for all types of elective and emergency surgery, apart from burn injuries and head and neck surgery. Where evidence was lacking, recommendations for future research were generated. Specific recommendations are made for fluid management in elective major noncardiac surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, thoracic surgery, neurosurgery, minor noncardiac surgery under general anaesthesia, and critical illness. There are ongoing gaps in knowledge resulting in variation in practice and some disagreement with our consensus recommendations. Perioperative fluid management should be individualised, taking into account the type of surgery and important patient factors, including intravascular volume status and acute and chronic comorbidities. Recommendations are made for further research in perioperative fluid management to address important gaps.

Use of Intravenous Albumin: A Guideline From the International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Albumin is used commonly across a wide range of clinical settings to improve hemodynamics, to facilitate fluid removal, and to manage complications of cirrhosis. The International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine Guidelines developed guidelines for the use of albumin in patients requiring critical care, undergoing cardiovascular surgery, undergoing kidney replacement therapy, or experiencing complications of cirrhosis.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Cochairs oversaw the guideline development process and the panel included researchers, clinicians, methodologists, and a patient representative. The evidence informing this guideline arises from a systematic review of randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews, in which multiple databases were searched (inception through November 23, 2022). The panel reviewed the data and formulated the guideline recommendations using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. The guidelines were revised after public consultation.

RESULTS

The panel made 14 recommendations on albumin use in adult critical care (three recommendations), pediatric critical care (one recommendation), neonatal critical care (two recommendations), cardiovascular surgery (two recommendations), kidney replacement therapy (one recommendation), and complications of cirrhosis (five recommendations). Of the 14 recommendations, two recommendations had moderate certainty of evidence, five recommendations had low certainty of evidence, and seven recommendations had very low certainty of evidence. Two of the 14 recommendations suggested conditional use of albumin for patients with cirrhosis undergoing large-volume paracentesis or with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Twelve of 14 recommendations did not suggest albumin use in a wide variety of clinical situations where albumin commonly is transfused.

INTERPRETATION

Currently, few evidence-based indications support the routine use of albumin in clinical practice to improve patient outcomes. These guidelines provide clinicians with actionable recommendations on the use of albumin.

Serum Albumin for Short-Term Poor Prognosis in Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Clinical Study Based on a Database

The relationship between serum albumin (ALB) and short-term prognosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE) remains unclear. We investigated the predictive value of ALB for short-term prognosis in APE patients using our hospital pulmonary embolism (PE) database (384 patients consecutively collected). Logistic regression analysis and nomograms were applied to construct the predictive model, and validation was assessed. A total of 340 APE patients were included, with a 30-day all-cause mortality rate of 8.5%. The incidence of hypoalbuminemia was 15.9%. The odds ratio (OR) for short-term mortality in patients with high ALB was 0.89 (0.886, 95% CI: 0.812-0.967). Additionally, we created a nomogram for individualized mortality risk prediction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the diagnostic area under the curve (AUC) of ALB was 0.758 (95% CI 0.683-0.833), and the best cut-off value was 33.85 g/L. Optimal simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) (ALB combined sPESI) AUC was 0.835 (95% CI 0.775-0.896). Baseline hypoalbuminemia may be an independent prognostic indicator of short-term mortality in patients with APE.

Use of a Novel Buffered Hypertonic Saline Solution for Fluid Replacement and Resuscitation During Spinal Surgery in Adolescents

Background

During major orthopedic procedures, such as posterior spinal fusion (PSF), isotonic fluids, colloids, starches, or gelatins are commonly used to replace the preoperative fluid deficit and provide ongoing fluid resuscitation. Given recent concerns regarding the potential adverse physiologic effects of albumin solutions, we have modified our intraoperative practice to include the use of a novel 2% buffered hypertonic saline solution during major orthopedic procedures. We present our preliminary clinical experience with this novel fluid for intraoperative resuscitation and its impact on limiting the use of 5% albumin.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed to identify patients who received 2% buffered hypertonic saline during PSF. The intraoperative course of these patients was compared to case-matched control patients who received standard care with isotonic fluids plus 5% albumin as an adjunct for intravascular resuscitation.

Results

The study cohort included 23 patients who received 2% buffered hypertonic saline and 25 in the case-matched control group. There was no difference in the volume of intraoperative isotonic crystalloid fluids, estimated blood loss, and urine output between the two groups. In the control cohort, 19 of 25 patients (76%) received 5% albumin compared to only six of 23 patients (26%, P = 0.0005) in the 2% buffered hypertonic saline group. The final pH was higher in the patients that received 2% buffered hypertonic saline than in the control group (7.40 ± 0.03 versus 7.36 ± 0.06, P = 0.0131). Additionally, the starting and final serum sodium values were higher in the patients that received 2% buffered hypertonic saline, although no difference was noted in the mean change from the starting value (average increase of 2 mEq/L in both groups).

Conclusion

Use of a novel 2% buffered hypertonic saline solution for intraoperative resuscitation during major orthopedic procedures decreases the need for 5% albumin while avoiding the development of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis which may occur with standard sodium chloride solutions.

Albumin Infusion and Blood Loss After Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

In the recent ALBICS (ALBumin In Cardiac Surgery) trial, 4% albumin used for cardiopulmonary bypass priming and volume replacement increased perioperative bleeding compared with Ringer acetate. In the present exploratory study, albumin-related bleeding was further characterized.

METHODS

Ringer acetate and 4% albumin were compared in a randomized, double-blinded fashion in 1386 on-pump adult cardiac surgery patients. The study end points for bleeding were the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding (UDPB) class and its components.

RESULTS

The UDPB bleeding grades were higher in the albumin group than the Ringer group: "insignificant" (albumin vs Ringer: 47.5% vs 62.9%), "mild" (12.7% vs 8.9%), "moderate" (28.7% vs 24.4%), "severe" (10.2% vs 3.2%), and "massive" (0.9% vs. 0.6%; P < .001). Patients in the albumin group received red blood cells (45.2% vs 31.5%; odds ratio [OR], 1.80; 95% CI, 1.44-2.24; P < .001), platelets (33.3% vs 21.8%; OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.41-2.28; P < .001), and fibrinogen (5.6% vs 2.6%; OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.27-3.95; P < .05), and underwent resternotomy (5.3% vs 1.9%; OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.55-5.60, P < .001) more often than patients in the Ringer group. The strongest predictors of bleeding were albumin group allocation (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.74-2.74) and complex (OR, 2.61; 95% CI, 2.02-3.37) and urgent surgery (OR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.26-2.13). In interaction analysis, the effect of albumin on the risk of bleeding was stronger in patients on preoperative acetylsalicylic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative administration of albumin, compared with Ringer's acetate, resulted in increased blood loss and higher UDBP class. The magnitude of this effect was similar to the complexity and urgency of the surgery.

Association between 20% Albumin Use and Acute Kidney Injury in Major Abdominal Surgery with Transfusion

Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and albumin administration can affect kidney function. We aimed to evaluate the association between intraoperative 20% albumin administration and acute kidney injury (AKI), along with the duration of hospitalization and 30-day mortality in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery with RBC transfusion. This retrospective study included 2408 patients who received transfusions during major abdominal surgery. Patients were categorized into albumin (n = 842) or no-albumin (n = 1566) groups. We applied inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), propensity score (PS) matching (PSM), and PS covariate adjustment to assess the effect of albumin administration on the outcomes. In the unadjusted cohort, albumin administration was significantly associated with increased risk of AKI, prolonged hospitalization, and higher 30-day mortality. However, there was no significant association between albumin administration and AKI after adjustment (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.90-1.76 for the IPTW; OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.72-1.48 for the PSM; and OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.76-1.43 for the PS covariate adjustment methods). While albumin exposure remained associated with prolonged hospitalization after adjustment, it did not affect 30-day mortality. Our findings suggest that hyper-oncotic albumin can be safely administered to patients who are at risk of developing AKI due to RBC transfusion.

Albumin use for fluid resuscitation in cardiac surgical patients: a survey of Canadian perioperative care providers

PURPOSE

To evaluate the perceptions and practices of Canadian cardiovascular anesthesiologists and intensivists towards intravenous albumin as a resuscitation fluid in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of cardiac anesthesiologists and intensivists involved in the care of cardiac surgical patients. The 22-item survey included seven open-ended questions and assessed practice patterns and attitudes towards albumin. Descriptive statistics were analyzed using counts and proportions. Qualitative data were analyzed to identify themes describing albumin use patterns in Canada.

RESULTS

A total of 133 respondents from seven provinces participated, with 83 (62%) using albumin perioperatively. The majority of respondents (77%) felt a low fluid balance in cardiac surgical patients was important, and that supplementing crystalloids with albumin was helpful for this objective (67%). There was poor agreement among survey respondents regarding the role of albumin for faster vasopressor weaning or intensive care discharge, and ≥ 90% did not feel albumin reduced mortality, renal injury, or coagulopathy. Nevertheless, cardiac surgical patients were identified as a distinct population where albumin may help to minimize fluid balance. There was an acknowledged paucity of formal evidence supporting possible benefits. Fewer than 10% of respondents could identify institutional or national guidelines for albumin use. A lack of evidence supporting albumin use in cardiac surgical patients, especially those at highest risk of complications, was a frequently identified concern.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of Canadian anesthesiologists and intensivists (62%) use albumin in cardiac surgical patients. There is clinical equipoise regarding its utility, and an acknowledged need for higher quality evidence to guide practice.