Prevalence and Psychobiological Correlates of Depression Among Breast Cancer Patients

Effects of exercise on life satisfaction of people diagnosed with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

A cancer diagnosis is commonly associated with a decline in patient's life satisfaction and more pessimistic expectations about the future. The identification of strategies to improve life satisfaction in patients with cancer is of great interest to health practitioners since it may be associated with a better prognosis of cancer and higher survival rates. Previous meta-analyses and reviews concluded that exercise could significantly improve health-related quality of life in this population, but the effects of exercise on life satisfaction are still not well-known. This review aims to analyse the effects of exercise programs on life satisfaction in people with cancer and individuals who have overcome cancer.

METHODS

The present systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A thorough search of databases including Web of Science and PubMed/MEDLINE was carried out. Six studies (535 participants) in which the effect of an exercise program was compared to a non-exercise program control condition in patients with cancer were considered eligible. A subsequent meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model to calculate the standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Exercise intervention improved satisfaction with life compared with a control condition (SMD = 1.28; p = 0.02 with a 95% CI of 0.22 to 2.34).

CONCLUSION

Exercise could be considered an effective tool to improve life satisfaction in patients with cancer. Hence, professionals might consider the possibility of integrating physical exercise into strategies aimed at enhancing the low life satisfaction often experienced by patients.

PROSPERO

CRD42023438146.

Work Ability, Anxiety, and Depression among Long-Term Breast Cancer Survivors of Northern Kerala, India; A Historical Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Increasing number of breast cancer cases, and improved survival due to advancements in early detection, and treatment resulted in an increase in women living beyond a cancer diagnosis. Survivors have to face long-term physical effects as well as psychosocial issues post-treatment. This study aims to study survivourship in terms of work ability, anxiety and depression.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study on female breast cancer survivors from Hospital Based Cancer Registry (HBCR) of a Tertiary Cancer Centre (TCC). Data from 2016 (n=534) were collected from the medical records, and a follow-up survey (n=209) was conducted in 2022 to study their survivorship issues.

RESULTS

In 2022, the mean age of the cohort (n=209) was 55.45 ± 9.36. The mean work ability score was 40.7±5.73 (95% CI 39.92 to 41.48).  In the multivariate binary logistic regression model, those who were married (OR 7.15, 95%CI 2.61 to 19.55), disease-free (OR 15.27, 95% CI 2.36 to 98.7), employed (OR 9.09, 95%CI 1.12 to 73.5), having no fatigue (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.05 to 6.48), no pain (OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.16 to 8.35), and no depression (OR 6.58, 95% CI 1.82-23.8) were found to have optimal work ability. Anxiety (OR 4.93, 95% CI 1.76 to 13.76), and sub-optimal work ability (OR 4.22, 95% CI 1.39 to 12.77) were predictors of depression among survivors. Disease status and fatigue were associated with all three dimensions of survivorship in our study.

CONCLUSION

Understanding survivorship will help improve health outcomes in this population. In our study, work ability, anxiety, depression, and their associated factors were found to be interrelated. Interventions in these areas can go a long way in improving breast cancer survivorship.

Navigating the Intersection of Technology and Depression Precision Medicine

This chapter primarily focuses on the progress in depression precision medicine with specific emphasis on the integrative approaches that include artificial intelligence and other data, tools, and technologies. After the description of the concept of precision medicine and a comparative introduction to depression precision medicine with cancer and epilepsy, new avenues of depression precision medicine derived from integrated artificial intelligence and other sources will be presented. Additionally, less advanced areas, such as comorbidity between depression and cancer, will be examined.

Exploring adherence in patients with advanced breast cancer: focus on CDK4/6 inhibitors

Treatment adherence is crucial for optimal outcomes in advanced breast cancer, but can be challenging due to various factors, i.e. patients' attitudes and behavior upon diagnosis, and complex therapies with high adverse effect rates. Our aim was to explore the adherence to oral anticancer medications (OAM) in women with advanced breast cancer, focusing on cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDKI), and identify factors associated with the adherence. We conducted a cross-sectional study at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Croatia, involving women with stage IV advanced breast cancer receiving OAM. Data collection included a questionnaire assessing socio-demographic and clinical information, Beck Depression Inventory-II for depressive symptoms, Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5) for adherence to OAM, and Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire. Plasma concentrations of CDKI were confirmed by LC-MS/MS in three randomly selected participants. A total of 89 women were included. The most prescribed OAMs were anti-estrogen (71.3 %) and CDKI (60.9 %). MARS-5 scores (mean: 24.1 ± 1.6) correlated with CDKI plasma concentrations. Forgetfulness was the primary reason for non-adherence (25.9 %). Women receiving CDKI (p = 0.018), without depressive symptomatology (p = 0.043), and with more positive beliefs about medicines were more adherent (p < 0.05). This study enhances understanding of medication adherence in advanced breast cancer and identifies influential factors.

Patients with palpitations experience a higher symptom burden prior to breast cancer surgery

PURPOSE

Anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and pain are common symptoms reported by patients with breast cancer. Recent evidence suggests that palpitations, a feeling of the heart racing or pounding, may be equally common. Study purpose was to compare the severity and clinically meaningful occurrence rates of common symptoms and quality of life (QOL) outcomes between patients with breast cancer who did and did not report palpitations prior to surgery.

METHODS

Patients (n = 398) were classified as having or not having palpitations using a single item from the Menopausal Symptoms Scale. Valid and reliable measures were used to assess state and trait anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, fatigue, energy, cognitive function, breast symptoms, and QOL. Between group differences were evaluated using parametric and non-parametric tests.

RESULTS

Patients with palpitations (15.1%) reported significantly higher severity scores for state and trait anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, and fatigue as well as significant decrements in energy and cognitive function (all p < .05). A higher percentage of these patients had clinically meaningful levels of state anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance and decrements in cognitive function (all p < .05). Except for spiritual well-being, QOL scores were lower in the palpitations group (all p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Findings support the need for routine assessment of palpitations and management of multiple symptoms in women prior to breast cancer surgery.

Trends, characteristics, race, and ethnicity associated with nonadherence to antidepressants among breast cancer survivors with depression

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer in the United States, and half of breast cancer survivors experience major depressive disorders (hereafter depression). Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) quality measures evaluating depression treatment practices recommend uninterrupted antidepressant treatment for 3 months in the acute phase and 3 months in the continuation phase for the general population. However, little is known about the extent of and trends in antidepressant nonadherence among breast cancer survivors with depression, which may impact adherence to breast cancer treatment, potentially leading to breast cancer recurrence and other adverse outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the trends and characteristics associated with antidepressant nonadherence among breast cancer survivors with depression in the United States. METHODS: We conducted cross-sectional analyses of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results linked with Medicare data (2010-2019) for women with breast cancer and depression who newly initiated antidepressant use. Using HEDIS measures of nonadherence (ie, antidepressant prescription coverage ≤84 days of the 114-day acute phase or ≤180 days of the 231-day continuation phase), we calculated the annual crude prevalence of antidepressant nonadherence and examined trends using unadjusted logistic regression. Multivariable logistic regression identified characteristics associated with antidepressant nonadherence. RESULTS: Among 9,452 eligible breast cancer survivors with depression (aged ≥65 years = 84% and White race = 82%), the crude prevalence of antidepressant nonadherence decreased from 2010 to 2019 for both the acute (49% to 40%; P_trend<0.001) and continuation (67% to 57%; P_trend<0.001) phases. Factors significantly associated with higher odds of antidepressant nonadherence in both the acute and continuation phases included Black race (odds ratios [ORs] [95% CI] for the acute/continuation phases: 2.0 [1.7-2.4]/2.0 [1.7-2.3]) and Hispanic ethnicity (1.5 [1.1-1.9]/2.2 [1.6-2.9]) compared with White race; receiving the first antidepressant from an oncologist vs a psychiatrist (1.4 [1.1-1.8]/1.6 [1.2-2.0]); and using antidepressants not recommended for older adults by the Beers criteria (2.2 [1.6-2.9]/2.0 [1.4-2.7]). Factors associated with lower odds of antidepressant nonadherence in both phases included receiving lymph node dissection (0.7 [0.5-0.9]/0.7 [0.5-0.9]), receiving endocrine therapy (0.9 [0.8-0.9]/0.8 [0.7-0.9]), having a higher National Cancer Institute comorbid index (0.8 [0.7-0.8]/0.9 [0.8-0.9]), having a follow-up visit with a psychiatrist (0.9 [0.8-0.9]/0.9 [0.8-0.9]), and switching to different antidepressants (0.7 [0.6-0.8]/0.7 [0.7-0.8]). CONCLUSIONS: Despite antidepressant nonadherence prevalence decreasing from 2010 to 2019, over half of breast cancer survivors with depression and Medicare were nonadherent in the continuation phase. Patients with identified nonadherence risk factors may benefit from close monitoring and targeted interventions. DISCLOSURES: Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic reported grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA044985 and R01DA050676), the National Institute on Aging (R21AG060308), the National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH121907), Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, the Richard King Mellon Foundation at the University of Pittsburgh, the Clinical and Translational Science Institute of the University of Florida, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) Foundation, and the US Department of Veterans Affairs outside the submitted work; in addition, Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic has a patent pending for U1195.70174US00. Haesuk Park reported grants from Bristol Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance American Thrombosis Investigator Initiated Research Program (ARISTA-USA) outside the submitted work. Juan M. Hincapie-Castillo reported grants from Merck outside the submitted work. Debbie Wilson reported grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institute on Aging, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Bristol Myers Squibb outside the submitted work; and serving as an editorial board member for the Journal of Pharmacy Technology. Ching-Yuan Chang's contributions to this manuscript were made while at the University of Florida College of Pharmacy. Ching-Yuan Chang is currently employed by Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Vertex did not fund or have any involvement in this study or publication. Vakaramoko Diaby is currently employed by Otsuka, Inc. Otsuka did not fund or have any involvement in this study or publication. No other disclosures were reported.

Associations Between Demographic, Clinical, and Symptom Characteristics and Stress in Oncology Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing cancer treatment experience global stress and cancer-specific stress. Both types of stress are associated with a higher symptom burden.

OBJECTIVE

In this cross-sectional study, we used a comprehensive set of demographic, clinical, and symptom characteristics to evaluate their relative contribution to the severity of global and cancer-specific stress.

METHODS

Patients (N = 941) completed study questionnaires before their second or third cycle of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Consistent with our a priori hypothesis, we found both common and distinct characteristics associated with higher levels of global stress and cancer-specific stress. A significant proportion of our patients had scores on the Impact of Event Scale-Revised suggestive of subsyndromal (29.4%) or probable (13.9%) posttraumatic stress disorder. Four of the 5 stepwise linear regression analyses for the various stress scales explained between 41.6% and 54.5% of the total variance. Compared with various demographic and clinical characteristics, many of the common symptoms associated with cancer and its treatments uniquely explained a higher percentage of the variance in the various stress scales. Symptoms of depression made the largest unique contribution to the percentage of total explained variance across all 5 scales.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians need to assess for global stress, cancer-specific stress, and depression in patients receiving chemotherapy.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Patients may benefit from integrative interventions (eg, mindfulness-based stress reduction, cognitive behavioral therapy, acupuncture) that simultaneously address stress and symptoms commonly associated with cancer and its treatments.

Psychological distress and body image disturbances after modified radical mastectomy among breast cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study from a tertiary care centre in North India

Background

Breast cancer (BC) diagnosis and treatment can affect women both physically and psychologically. Women with BC undergo various painful and debilitating therapies as well as emotional trauma. Additionally, treatment modalities can bring about multiple changes, causing distress and alteration in one's appearance. This study aimed to assess the psychological distress and body image disturbances after modified radical mastectomy (MRM) among BC survivors.

Methods

A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care centre in North India on 165 female survivors of BC who underwent MRM and attended outpatient follow-up. The median (interquartile range) age was 42 (36-51) years. Patients were evaluated using MINI 6·0·0 to assess for psychiatric comorbidities. The Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) was used to measure psychological distress. Additionally, the ten-item Body Image Satisfaction (BIS-10) scale was used to evaluate body image disturbances.

Findings

The rates of depression, anxiety, and stress were 27·8%, 31·5%, and 24·8%, respectively. Most patients (92%) experienced body image disturbances, and BC survivors who completed treatment within 12 months were more likely (p < 0·01) to have body image disturbances than women who had a long time since completion of treatment. Body image disturbances were not associated with age or psychological distress.

Interpretation

Depression, anxiety, stress, and body image issues are common among BC survivors. Follow-up management plans for BC survivors should also include evaluation and treatment of psychological distress and addressing body image disturbances in patients undergoing mastectomy.

Funding

Not applicable.

Risk factors for heightened COVID-19-Related anxiety among breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted medical care, increased isolation, and exacerbated anxiety in breast cancer patients. Since March 2020, Breastcancer.org experienced a sustained surge in requested pandemic-related information and support. To characterize the pandemic-related experiences of breast cancer patients, we surveyed the Breastcancer.org Community early in the COVID-19 era.

METHODS

Breastcancer.org Community members were invited to complete an online questionnaire regarding their experience during the pandemic. Self-reported data on demographics, comorbidities, care disruptions, anxiety, coping ability, telemedicine use, and satisfaction with care were collected. Results were analyzed using Stata 16.0 (Stata Corp., Inc).

RESULTS

Included were 568 current and previous breast cancer patients, primarily with U.S. residence. Overall, 43.8% reported at least one comorbidity associated with severe COVID-19 illness and 61.9% experienced care delays. Moderate to extreme anxiety about contracting COVID-19 was reported by 36.5%, increasing with number of comorbidities (33.0% vs. 55.4%, p = 0.021), current breast cancer diagnosis (30.4% vs. 42.5%, p = 0.011), and poorer coping ability (15.5% vs. 53.9%, p < 0.0001). Moderate to extreme anxiety about cancer care disruptions was reported by 29.1%, increasing with current breast cancer diagnosis (19.1% vs. 38.9%, p < 0.0001), actual delayed care (18.9% vs. 35.3%, p < 0.0001), and poorer coping ability (13.1% vs. 57.7%, p < 0.0001). Most utilized telehealth and found it helpful, but also expressed increased anxiety and subjectively expressed that these were less preferable.

CONCLUSION

Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, anxiety was reported by a large proportion of breast cancer patients, with increased prevalence in those with risk factors. Attention to mental health is critical, as emotional distress not only harms quality of life but may also compromise outcomes.

Factors Related to Anxiety, Depressive Symptoms and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is a major public health problem internationally. Although illness survival rates have improved, patients usually suffer multiple symptoms, both physical and psychological, which can affect their quality of life (QoL). The main aim of this study was to evaluate depressive symptoms, anxiety and the QoL of people with BC. An observational, cross-sectional study was carried out at Badajoz University Hospital (Spain). A total of 200 women with BC were included. EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires were used to assess QoL. Patients were screened for depressive symptoms using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and for state anxiety and trait anxiety using the State Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Thirty-eight percent of the patients in the sample had moderate to severe anxiety, which was related to the time of diagnosis, advanced stage of illness and surgical treatment. We found that 28% of patients had depressive symptoms, related mainly with time of diagnosis, adjuvant therapy and number of cycles of chemotherapy (CT). Patients with the longest time since diagnosis, in stage III, and in treatment with CT, especially those with the greatest number of cycles, had the worst scores in QoL. We found a positive association between depressive symptoms and anxiety with QoL in patients with BC.

Posttraumatic Growth and Psychological Distress among Female Breast Cancer Survivors in India: A Cross-Sectional Study

Introduction Breast cancer survivors (BCS) may experience a cascade of negative reactions during the entire treatment process in the form of psychiatric morbidity. However, exposure to a traumatic event also has the fertile ground for the potential to catalyze a host of positive changes, including development in personal, interpersonal, and spiritual levels, commonly referred to as posttraumatic growth (PTG). PTG is defined as “positive psychological change experienced due to a struggle with highly challenging life circumstances.”

Objective This study aims to measure the prevalence and correlates of PTG among BCS.

Materials and Methods It was a cross-sectional study carried in a tertiary care center of North India from January 2021 to April 2021. Total 700 BCS were approached and screened using the purposive sampling technique. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 20.

Results The mean age (standard deviation [SD]) of the patients was 43.14 (8.53) years. The mean (SD) PTG score was 37 (13.66). Among the subdomain of PTG, most respondents showed growth in personal strength, relating to others, followed by an appreciation of life, spiritual change, and less growth in new possibilities. PTG was found to be significantly positively correlated with treatment completion time (r = 2.260, p = 0.02) and negatively correlated with depression, anxiety, and stress (r = –0.152, p = 0.04; r = –0.145, p = 0.05; r = –0.162, p = 0.02).

Conclusion Psychological morbidities must be addressed along with medical treatment of breast cancer so that growth post trauma can be further facilitated.

How Negative Is Negative Information

Daily, we face a plenty of negative information that can profoundly affect our perception and behavior. During devastating events such as the current COVID-19 pandemic, negative messages may hinder reasoning at individual level and social decisions in the society at large. These effects vary across genders in neurotypical populations (being more evident in women) and may be even more pronounced in individuals with neuropsychiatric disorders such as depression. Here, we examine how negative information impacts reasoning on a social perception task in females with breast cancer, a life-threatening disease. Two groups of patients and two groups of matched controls (N_TOTAL = 80; median age, 50 years) accomplished a psychometrically standardized social cognition and reasoning task receiving either the standard instruction solely or additional negative information. Performance substantially dropped in patients and matched controls who received negative information compared to those who did not. Moreover, patients with negative information scored much lower not only compared with controls but also with patients without negative information. We suggest the effects of negative information are mediated by the distributed brain networks involved in affective processing and emotional memory. The findings offer novel insights on the impact of negative information on social perception and decision making during life-threatening events, fostering better understanding of its neurobiological underpinnings.