1
|
Nicolazzi M, Di Martino M, Baroffio P, Donadon M. 6,126 hepatectomies in 2022: current trend of outcome in Italy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:211. [PMID: 38985363 PMCID: PMC11236879 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03398-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Whether hospital volume affects outcome of patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery, and whether the centralization of such procedures is justified remains to be investigated. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of liver surgery in Italy in relationship of hospital volume. METHODS This is a nationwide retrospective observational study conducted on data collected by the National Italian Registry "Piano Nazionale Esiti" (PNE) 2023 that included all liver procedures performed in 2022. Outcome measure were case volume and 30-day mortality. Hospitals were classified as very high-volume (H-Vol), intermediate-volume (I-Vol), low-volume (L-Vol) and very low-volume (VL-VoL). A review on centralization process and outcome measures was added. RESULTS 6,126 liver resections for liver tumors were performed in 327 hospitals in 2022. The 30-day mortality was 2.2%. There were 14 H-Vol, 19 I-Vol, 31 L-Vol and 263 VL-Vol hospitals with 30-day mortality of 1.7%, 2.2%, 2.6% and 3.6% respectively (P < 0.001); 220 centers (83%) performed less than 10 resections, and 78 (29%) centers only 1 resection in 2022. By considering the geographical macro-areas, the median count of liver resection performed in northern Italy exceeded those in central and southern Italy (57% vs. 23% vs. 20%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS High-volume has been confirmed to be associated to better outcome after hepatobiliary surgical procedures. Further studies are required to detail the factors associated with mortality. The centralization process should be redesigned and oversight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Nicolazzi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, 28100, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Corso Mazzini 18, Novara, 28100, Italy
| | - Marcello Di Martino
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, 28100, Italy
- Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Corso Mazzini 18, Novara, 28100, Italy
| | - Paolo Baroffio
- Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Corso Mazzini 18, Novara, 28100, Italy
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, 28100, Italy.
- Department of Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Corso Mazzini 18, Novara, 28100, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Panettieri E, Vega EA, Salirrosas O, Ogiso S, Geller D, Conrad C. Global practice patterns of preoperative image reconstruction for liver surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:26-32. [PMID: 38353071 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2023.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Three-dimensional (3-D) liver modeling is used globally; however, its actual practice is limited to a few centers. This study aimed to assess practice patterns and barriers to the use of 3-D modeling among liver surgeons worldwide. METHODS A survey approved by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association research council consisting of 27 questions was conducted using an online questionnaire. Incomplete responses were excluded. RESULTS Of 235 respondents from 46 countries, 81.3% reported experience with 3-D modeling; however, only 21% used it in > 75% of cases. Surgeons using 3-D reconstruction were older (P = .025), worked more frequently at academic facilities (P = .007), and had more years of experience (P = .001), especially in minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) (P = .038). In addition, 3-D rendering was performed by surgeons in 50.8% of cases. Liver volumetry was the most frequent indication (80.1%), and decreased postoperative complications were the main perceived benefit (53.6%). CONCLUSIONS More experience in liver surgery because of seniority, case volume, and openness to novel technology (MILS) is associated with a greater appreciation for the value of 3-D modeling. Our results suggest the need for senior surgeons to help early-career surgeons consider 3-D modeling for the reported benefit of reduced intra- and postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Panettieri
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione "Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli" Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Eduardo A Vega
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Oscar Salirrosas
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Satoshi Ogiso
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - David Geller
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Claudius Conrad
- Department of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Suydam CR, Aranda MC, O'Hara TA, Kobylarz FC, Liang JN, Bandera B. Practice patterns of hepatobiliary surgery within the military. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7502-7510. [PMID: 37415016 PMCID: PMC10520085 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10150-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study is to evaluate the trends of hepatobiliary surgeries performed at military hospitals and to discuss potential implications on resident training and military readiness. While there is data to suggest centralization of surgical specialty services leads to improved patient outcomes, the military does not currently have a specific centralization policy. Implementation of such a policy could potentially impact resident training and readiness of military surgeons. Even in the absence of such a policy, there may still be a trend toward centralization of more complex surgeries like hepatobiliary surgeries. The present study evaluates the numbers and types of hepatobiliary procedures performed at military hospitals. METHODS This study is a retrospective review of de-identified data from Military Health System Mart (M2) from 2014 to 2020. The M2 database contains patient data from all Defense Health Agency treatment facilities, encompassing all branches of the United States Military. Variables collected include number and types of hepatobiliary procedures performed and patient demographics. The primary endpoint was the number and type of surgery for each medical facility. Linear regression was used to evaluate significant trends in numbers of surgeries over time. RESULTS Fifty-five military hospitals performed hepatobiliary surgeries from 2014 to 2020. A total of 1,087 hepatobiliary surgeries were performed during this time; cholecystectomies, percutaneous procedures, and endoscopic procedures were excluded. There was no significant decrease in overall case volume. The most commonly performed hepatobiliary surgery was "unlisted laparoscopic liver procedure." The military training facility with the most hepatobiliary cases was Brooke Army Medical Center. CONCLUSION The number of hepatobiliary surgeries performed in military hospitals has not significantly decreased over the years 2014-2020, despite a national trend toward centralization. Centralization of hepatobiliary surgeries in the future may impact residency training as well as military medical readiness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille R Suydam
- Department of Surgery, Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, USA.
| | - Marcos C Aranda
- Department of Surgery, Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, USA
| | - Thomas A O'Hara
- Department of Surgery, Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, USA
| | - Fred C Kobylarz
- Department of Surgery, Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, USA
| | - Joy N Liang
- Department of Surgery, Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, USA
| | - Bradley Bandera
- Department of Surgery, Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Donadon M, Montorsi M. Volume-outcome in oncological surgery: reflections on education and training. Updates Surg 2023; 75:1383-1386. [PMID: 37501015 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01600-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Donadon
- Department of Health Sciences, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Via Solaroli 17, 28100, Italy.
- Department of General Surgery, University Maggiore Hospital della Carità, Novara, Corso Giuseppe Mazzini 18, 28100, Italy.
| | - Marco Montorsi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, Pieve Emanuele, 20072, Milan, Italy
- Division of General and Digestive Surgery, Department of General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Alessandro Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van der Ven RGFM, Westra D, van Erning FN, de Hingh IH, Olde Damink SWM, Paulus A, Leclercq WKG, den Dulk M. The impact of a multi-hospital network on the inequality in odds of receiving resection or ablation for synchronous colorectal liver metastases. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:842-852. [PMID: 37548150 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2238545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigates whether inequalities in the utilization of resection and/or ablation for synchronous colorectal liver metastases (SCLM) between patients diagnosed in expert and non-expert hospitals changed since a multi-hospital network started. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with SCLM between 2009 and 2020 were included. The likelihood of receiving ablation and/or resection was analyzed in the prenetwork (2009-2012), startup (2013-2016), and matured-network (2017-2020) periods. RESULTS Nationwide, 13.981patients were diagnosed between 2009 and 2020, of whom 1.624 were diagnosed in the network. Of patients diagnosed in the network's expert hospitals, 36.7% received ablation and/or resection versus 28.3% in nonexpert hospitals (p < 0.01). The odds ratio (OR) of receiving ablation and/or resection for patients diagnosed in expert versus nonexpert hospitals increased from 1.38 (p = 0.581, pre-network), to 1.66 (p = 0.108, startup), to 2.48 (p = 0.090, matured-network). Nationwide, the same trend occurred (respectively OR 1.41, p = 0.011; OR 2.23, p < 0.001; OR 3.20, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients diagnosed in expert hospitals were more likely to receive ablation and/or resection for SCLM than patients diagnosed in non-expert hospitals. This difference increased over time despite the startup of a multi-hospital network. Establishing a multi-hospital network did not have an effect on reducing the existing unequal odds of receiving specialized treatment. SYNOPSIS Specialized oncology treatments are increasingly provided through multi-hospital networks. However, scant empirical evidence on the effectiveness of these networks exists. This study analyzes whether a regional multi-hospital network was able to improve equal access to specialized oncology treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roos G F M van der Ven
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Daan Westra
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Felice N van Erning
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Ignace H de Hingh
- Department of Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Steven W M Olde Damink
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Agnes Paulus
- Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter K G Leclercq
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medical Center, Eindhoven and Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Serenari M, Lenzi J, Cucchetti A, Cipriani F, Donadon M, Ardito F, Fazio F, Nicolini D, Iaria M, Famularo S, Perri P, Ansaloni L, Zanello M, Lai Q, Conci S, Molfino S, Ferrari C, Germani P, Zago M, Romano M, Zimmitti G, Antonucci A, Fumagalli L, Troci A, Ferraro V, Memeo R, Crespi M, Chiarelli M, Ercolani G, Hilal MA, Zanus G, Pinotti E, Tarchi P, Griseri G, Baiocchi GL, Ruzzenente A, Rossi M, Jovine E, Maestri M, Grazi GL, Romano F, Dalla Valle R, Ravaioli M, Vivarelli M, Ferrero A, Giuliante F, Torzilli G, Aldrighetti L, Cescon M. The Effect of a Liver Transplant Program on the Outcomes of Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Nationwide Multicenter Analysis. Ann Surg 2023; 277:664-671. [PMID: 35766422 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of a liver transplantation (LT) program on the outcomes of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). BACKGROUND Surgical treatment of HCC includes both hepatic resection (HR) and LT. However, the presence of cirrhosis and the possibility of recurrence make the management of this disease complex and probably different according to the presence of a LT program. METHODS Patients undergoing HR for HCC between January 2005 and December 2019 were identified from a national database of HCC. The main study outcomes were major surgical complications according to the Comprehensive Complication Index, posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), 90-day mortality, overall survival, and disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes were salvage liver transplantation (SLT) and postrecurrence survival. RESULTS A total of 3202 patients were included from 25 hospitals over the study period. Three of 25 (12%) had an LT program. The presence of an LT program within a center was associated with a reduced probability of PHLF (odds ratio=0.38) but not with overall survival and disease-free survival. There was an increased probability of SLT when HR was performed in a transplant hospital (odds ratio=12.05). Among transplant-eligible patients, those who underwent LT had a significantly longer postrecurrence survival. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that the presence of a LT program was associated with decreased PHLF rates and an increased probability to receive SLT in case of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Serenari
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Jacopo Lenzi
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, Ospedale San Raffaele IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Fazio
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital "Umberto I," Turin, Italy
| | - Daniele Nicolini
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Maurizio Iaria
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Simone Famularo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Pasquale Perri
- Division of Hepatobiliarypancreatic Unit, IRCCS-Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- Unit of General Surgery 1, University of Pavia and Foundation IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Matteo Zanello
- Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, AOU Sant'Orsola Malpighi, IRCCS at Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Quirino Lai
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Simone Conci
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Sarah Molfino
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Paola Germani
- Surgical Clinics, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Mauro Zago
- Department of Surgery, Ponte San Pietro Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
- Department of Emergency and Robotic Surgery, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy
| | - Maurizio Romano
- Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Gastroenterological Science (DISCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit-Treviso Hospital, Treviso, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of General Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Luca Fumagalli
- Department of Emergency and Robotic Surgery, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy
| | - Albert Troci
- Department of Surgery, L. Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Ferraro
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, Miulli Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, Miulli Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Marco Chiarelli
- Department of Emergency and Robotic Surgery, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Mohamed A Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giacomo Zanus
- Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Gastroenterological Science (DISCOG), University of Padua, Padua, Italy
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit-Treviso Hospital, Treviso, Italy
| | - Enrico Pinotti
- Department of Surgery, Ponte San Pietro Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Paola Tarchi
- Surgical Clinics, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Guido Griseri
- HPB Surgical Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Savona, Italy
| | - Gian Luca Baiocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology, and Pediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimo Rossi
- General Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Elio Jovine
- Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, AOU Sant'Orsola Malpighi, IRCCS at Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marcello Maestri
- Unit of General Surgery 1, University of Pavia and Foundation IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Gian Luca Grazi
- Division of Hepatobiliarypancreatic Unit, IRCCS-Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Romano
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Ravaioli
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital "Umberto I," Turin, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, Ospedale San Raffaele IRCCS, Milano, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Cescon
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Serenari M, Ratti F, Guglielmo N, Zanello M, Mocchegiani F, Lenzi J, Colledan M, Mazzaferro V, Cillo U, Ferrero A, Cescon M, Di Benedetto F, Massani M, Grazi G, Valle RD, Vivarelli M, Ettorre GM, Aldrighetti L, Jovine E. Evolution of minimally invasive techniques and surgical outcomes of ALPPS in Italy: a comprehensive trend analysis over 10 years from a national prospective registry. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-09937-4. [PMID: 36976422 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09937-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2012, Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has encountered several modifications of its original technique. The primary endpoint of this study was to analyze the trend of ALPPS in Italy over a 10-year period. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate factors affecting the risk of morbidity/mortality/post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). METHODS Data of patients submitted to ALPPS between 2012 and 2021 were identified from the ALPPS Italian Registry and evaluation of time trends was performed. RESULTS From 2012 to 2021, a total of 268 ALPPS were performed within 17 centers. The number of ALPPS divided by the total number of liver resections performed by each center slightly declined (APC = - 2.0%, p = 0.111). Minimally invasive (MI) approach significantly increased over the years (APC = + 49.5%, p = 0.002). According to multivariable analysis, MI completion of stage 1 was protective against 90-day mortality (OR = 0.05, p = 0.040) as well as enrollment within high-volume centers for liver surgery (OR = 0.32, p = 0.009). Use of interstage hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) and biliary tumors were independent predictors of PHLF. CONCLUSIONS This national study showed that use of ALPPS only slightly declined over the years with an increased use of MI techniques, leading to lower 90-day mortality. PHLF still remains an open issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Serenari
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Guglielmo
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, S. Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Zanello
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Federico Mocchegiani
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Jacopo Lenzi
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Michele Colledan
- Department of Organ Failure and Transplantation, ASST Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università di Milano, Bicocca, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Cillo
- General Surgery 2 - Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital Umberto I, Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Cescon
- General Surgery and Transplant Unit, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Marco Massani
- Regional Center for HPB Surgery, Regional Hospital of Treviso, Treviso, Italy
| | - Gianluca Grazi
- Division of Hepatobiliarypancreatic Unit, IRCCS, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marco Vivarelli
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Jovine
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
- Department of General Surgery, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Di Benedetto F, Magistri P, Di Sandro S, Sposito C, Oberkofler C, Brandon E, Samstein B, Guidetti C, Papageorgiou A, Frassoni S, Bagnardi V, Clavien PA, Citterio D, Kato T, Petrowsky H, Halazun KJ, Mazzaferro V. Safety and Efficacy of Robotic vs Open Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:46-54. [PMID: 36416833 PMCID: PMC9685546 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.5697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Importance Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic surgery remain a hotly debated topic in surgical oncology, but sparse data have been published thus far. Objective To analyze short- and long-term outcomes of robotic liver resection (RLR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from Western high-volume centers to assess the safety, reproducibility, and oncologic efficacy of this technique. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study evaluated the outcomes of patients receiving RLR vs open liver resection (OLR) for HCC between 2010 and 2020 in 5 high-volume centers. After 1:1 propensity score matching, a group of patients who underwent RLR was compared with a validation cohort of OLR patients from a high-volume center that did not perform RLR. Main Outcomes and Measures A retrospective analysis was performed of prospectively maintained databases at 2 European and 2 US institutions of patients who underwent RLR for HCC between January 1, 2010, and September 30, 2020. The main outcomes were safety and feasibility of RLR for HCC and its oncologic outcomes compared with a European OLR validation cohort. A 2-sided P < .05 was considered significant. Results The study included 398 patients (RLR group: 125 men, 33 women, median [IQR] age, 66 [58-71] years; OLR group: 315 men, 83 women; median [IQR] age, 70 [64-74] years), and 106 RLR patients were compared with 106 OLR patients after propensity score matching. The RLR patients had a significantly longer operative time (median [IQR], 295 [190-370] minutes vs 200 [165-255] minutes, including docking; P < .001) but a significantly shorter hospital length of stay (median [IQR], 4 [3-6] days vs 10 [7-13] days; P < .001) and a lower number of admissions to the intensive care unit (7 [6.6%] vs 21 [19.8%]; P = .002). Incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure was significantly lower in the RLR group (8 [7.5%] vs 30 [28.3%]; P = .001), with no cases of grade C failure. The 90-day overall survival rate was comparable between the 2 groups (RLR, 99.1% [95% CI, 93.5%-99.9%]; OLR, 97.1% [95% CI, 91.3%-99.1%]), as was the cumulative incidence of death related to tumor recurrence (RLR, 8.8% [95% CI, 3.1%-18.3%]; OLR, 10.2% [95% CI, 4.9%-17.7%]). Conclusions and Relevance This study represents the largest Western experience to date of full RLR for HCC. Compared with OLR, RLR performed in tertiary centers represents a safe treatment strategy for patients with HCC and those with compromised liver function while achieving oncologic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Di Sandro
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Carlo Sposito
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Christian Oberkofler
- Swiss Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ellie Brandon
- Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Benjamin Samstein
- Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Cristiano Guidetti
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Alexandros Papageorgiou
- Swiss Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Samuele Frassoni
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Swiss Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Davide Citterio
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Tomoaki Kato
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Henrik Petrowsky
- Swiss Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplantation Center, Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Karim J. Halazun
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Trends in Liver Cancer Incidence and Survival in Italy by Histologic Type, 2003-2017. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246162. [PMID: 36551647 PMCID: PMC9777051 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Liver cancer in Italy is characterised by one of the highest incidence rates worldwide outside of Asia coupled with comparatively favourable survival figures. The objective of this study was to evaluate the most recent epidemiologic trends of the disease. (2) Methods: Thirteen cancer registries covering a population of about 12,740,000 (21% of the national population) made available the records of 35,574 cases registered between 2003 and 2017. Trends in age-standardised (Europe 2013) incidence rates were analysed using the results of age-drift models. Trends in survival were analysed using 1-year, 2-year, 5-year and 10-year net survival (NS) and 5|1-year and 5|2-year conditional NS. (3) Results: Over the study period, the average annual incidence rates per 100,000 persons were 29.4 (men) and 9.4 (women) for total liver cancer; 14.6 and 3.5 for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); 1.8 and 1.1 for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC); and 13.0 and 4.8 for the 'other liver cancer types' group. The incidence of total liver cancer and HCC decreased significantly for both sexes. For total liver cancer, the estimated average annual percent change was -1.6% among men and -2.1% among women. For HCC, the change was -1.3% among men and -2.7% among women. ICC followed an opposite trend. For men, the risk of HCC had two peaks, one in the birth cohorts of 1928 and 1933 and another, more moderate peak in the cohort of 1958. Men and women exhibited comparable improvements in both early and mid-term conditional NS from HCC. In 2013-2017, 5-year NS was 28.9% (95% CI: 27.3%; 30.6%) for men and 30.1% (95% CI: 26.9%; 33.5%) for women. The uptrend in survival from ICC was less pronounced and was weakly significant, with a 5-year NS in 2013-2017 of 13.9% (95% CI: 10.8%; 17.3%) for men and 17.4% (95% CI: 13.5%; 21.7%) for women. (4) Conclusions: The opposite incidence trends of HCC and ICC confirm a pattern observed in other populations. The generalised, albeit slow, improvement in survival from HCC indicates a trend towards earlier detection coupled with improvements in treatments.
Collapse
|
10
|
Famularo S, Russolillo N, Donadon M, Cipriani F, Ardito F, Perri P, Giani A, De Stefano F, Lai Q, Molfino S, Zanello M, Iaria M, La Barba G, Pinotti E, Germani P, Conci S, Ferrari C, Fumagalli L, Romano M, Antonucci A, Zimmitti G, Troci A, Floridi A, Ferraro V, Patauner S, Frena A, Memeo R, Crespi M, Hilal MA, Zanus G, Chiarelli M, Percivale A, Ruzzenente A, Tarchi P, Zago M, Ercolani G, Dalla Valle R, Jovine E, Baiocchi GL, Rossi M, Maestri M, Romano F, Grazi GL, Giuliante F, Aldrighetti L, Ferrero A, Torzilli G. Benchmarking postoperative outcomes after open liver surgery for cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in a national cohort. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1365-1375. [PMID: 35293320 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benchmark analysis for open liver surgery for cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still undefined. METHODS Patients were identified from the Italian national registry HE.RC.O.LE.S. The Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC) method was employed to identify the benchmarks. The outcomes assessed were the rate of complications, major comorbidities, post-operative ascites (POA), post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF), 90-day mortality. Benchmarking was stratified for surgical complexity (CP1, CP2 and CP3). RESULTS A total of 978 of 2698 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 431 (44.1%) patients were treated with CP1 procedures, 239 (24.4%) with CP2 and 308 (31.5%) with CP3 procedures. Patients submitted to CP1 had a worse underlying liver function, while the tumor burden was more severe in CP3 cases. The ABC for complications (13.1%, 19.2% and 28.1% for CP1, CP2 and CP3 respectively), major complications (7.6%, 11.1%, 12.5%) and 90-day mortality (0%, 3.3%, 3.6%) increased with the surgical difficulty, but not POA (4.4%, 3.3% and 2.6% respectively) and PHLF (0% for all groups). CONCLUSION We propose benchmarks for open liver resections in HCC cirrhotic patients, stratified for surgical complexity. The difference between the benchmark values and the results obtained during everyday practice reflects the room for potential growth, with the aim to encourage constant improvement among liver surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Famularo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Nadia Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital "Umberto I", Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Pasquale Perri
- Division of Hepatobiliarypancreatic Unit, IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Giani
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Francesca De Stefano
- Unit of General Surgery 1, University of Pavia and Foundation IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Quirino Lai
- Hepato-Biliary Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Sarah Molfino
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Matteo Zanello
- Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, AOU Sant'Orsola Malpighi, IRCCS at Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maurizio Iaria
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Giuliano La Barba
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - Enrico Pinotti
- Department of Surgery, Ponte San Pietro Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Paola Germani
- Surgical Clinics, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Simone Conci
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Luca Fumagalli
- Department of Emergency and Robotic Surgery, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy
| | - Maurizio Romano
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Science (DISCOG), University of Padua, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit - Treviso Hospital, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of General Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Albert Troci
- Department of Surgery, L. Sacco Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Valentina Ferraro
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, Miulli Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Stefan Patauner
- Department of General and Pediatric Surgery, Bolzano Central Hospital, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Antonio Frena
- Department of General and Pediatric Surgery, Bolzano Central Hospital, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, Miulli Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Mohammed A Hilal
- Department of General Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giacomo Zanus
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Science (DISCOG), University of Padua, Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit - Treviso Hospital, Italy
| | - Marco Chiarelli
- Department of Emergency and Robotic Surgery, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Paola Tarchi
- Surgical Clinics, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Mauro Zago
- Department of Surgery, Ponte San Pietro Hospital, Bergamo, Italy; Department of Emergency and Robotic Surgery, ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | | | - Elio Jovine
- Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, AOU Sant'Orsola Malpighi, IRCCS at Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gian Luca Baiocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Massimo Rossi
- Hepato-Biliary Surgery and Organ Transplantation Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Marcello Maestri
- Unit of General Surgery 1, University of Pavia and Foundation IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Romano
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Gian Luca Grazi
- Division of Hepatobiliarypancreatic Unit, IRCCS - Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital "Umberto I", Turin, Italy
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Carissimi F, Scotti MA, Ciulli C, Fogliati A, Uggeri F, Chiarelli M, Braga M, Romano F, Garancini M. COVID-19 and Liver Surgery: How the Pandemic Affected an Italian Medium-Volume HBP Center. Front Surg 2022; 9:918348. [PMID: 35836608 PMCID: PMC9275712 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.918348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction While the COVID-19 pandemic is still ongoing, it is even more evident that victims of the pandemic are not only those who contract the virus, but also the countless patients suffering from other serious diseases (i.e., tumor) who have undergone delayed potentially life-saving surgery due to a lack of beds. Like many hospitals, ours also initially blocked all elective oncologic surgery, but these operations were “recovered” and reintegrated in a relatively short time, thanks to the establishment of COVID-free wards and operating rooms with staff dedicated to oncological surgery. In tis context, our aim is to assess whether and how the severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has impacted our hepatobiliary surgery unit. Methods From our prospective database, we retrospectively took data from patients undergoing liver surgery in 2018–2019 (pre-COVID) and 2020–2021 (COVID period). Patients admitted to COVID-free wards must necessarily have a negative nasal swab from the previous 24 h. Results Between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019 (Group 1), 101 patients were treated; during the pandemic [January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021 (Group 2)], 126 patients were treated. There was no statistical difference between the groups. The median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days for both groups; 7 patients had major complications (Clavien-Dindo > 3) in Group 1 and 11 in Group 2 (p = 0.795). A total of 4 patients died in Group 1 and 6 during the pandemic (p = 0.754). Tumor burden was significantly greater in Group 2 where nodule size, lymphadenectomy, and extrahepatic disease were significantly greater (p = 0.011, p = 0.004, and p = 0.026, respectively). Conclusion During the COVID pandemic, our HPB unit managed to offer a volume of tertiary-center hepatobiliary surgery without a significant impact in terms of length of stay, morbidity, or mortality despite the increase in tumor burden during the pandemic years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Carissimi
- Department of Surgery, HPB and Gastroenterological Surgery Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro Alessandro Scotti
- Department of Surgery, HPB and Gastroenterological Surgery Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Cristina Ciulli
- Department of Surgery, HPB and Gastroenterological Surgery Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fogliati
- Department of Surgery, HPB and Gastroenterological Surgery Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Uggeri
- Department of Surgery, HPB and Gastroenterological Surgery Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marco Braga
- Department of Surgery, HPB and Gastroenterological Surgery Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Romano
- Department of Surgery, HPB and Gastroenterological Surgery Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Garancini
- Department of Surgery, HPB and Gastroenterological Surgery Unit, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Barba GL, Solaini L, Radi G, Mirarchi MT, D'Acapito F, Gardini A, Cucchetti A, Ercolani G. First 100 minimally invasive liver resections in a new tertiary referral centre for liver surgery. J Minim Access Surg 2022; 18:51-57. [PMID: 35017393 PMCID: PMC8830570 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_310_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the last decades, there has been an exponential diffusion of minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) worldwide. The aim of this study was to evaluate our initial experience of 100 patients undergoing MILS resection comparing their outcomes with the standard open procedures. Materials and Methods One hundred consecutive MILS from 2016 to 2019 were included. Clinicopathological data were reviewed to evaluate outcomes. Standard open resections were used as the control group and compared exploiting propensity score matching. Results In total, 290 patients were included. The rate of MILS has been constantly increasing throughout years, representing the 48% in 2019. Of 100 (34.5%) MILS patients, 85 could be matched. After matching, the MILS conversion rate was 5.8% (n = 5). The post-operative complication rates were higher in the open group (45.9% vs. 31.8%, P = 0.004). Post-operative blood transfusions were less common in the MILS group (4.7% vs. 16.5%, P = 0.021). Biliary leak occurred in 2 (2.4) MILS versus 13 (15.3) open. The median comprehensive complication index was higher in the open group (8.7 [0-28.6] vs. 0 [0-10.4], P = 0.0009). The post-operative length of hospital stay was shorter after MILS (median 6 [5-8] vs 8 [7-13] days, P < 0.0001). Conclusions The rate of MILS has been significantly increasing throughout the years. The benefits of MILS over the traditional open approach were confirmed. The main advantages include lower rates of post-operative complications, blood transfusions, bile leaks and a significantly decreased hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuliano La Barba
- Department of General Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, Italy
| | - Leonardo Solaini
- Department of General Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, DIMEC; Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgia Radi
- Department of General Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, Italy
| | | | - Fabrizio D'Acapito
- Department of General Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, Italy
| | - Andrea Gardini
- Department of General Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- Department of General Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, DIMEC; Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- Department of General Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forli; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, DIMEC; Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rocca A, Scacchi A, Cappuccio M, Avella P, Bugiantella W, De Rosa M, Costa G, Polistena A, Codacci-Pisanelli M, Amato B, Carbone F, Ceccarelli G. Robotic surgery for colorectal liver metastases resection: A systematic review. Int J Med Robot 2021; 17:e2330. [PMID: 34498805 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLMs) has never been investigated in large series. METHODS A systematic literature review was carried out on PubMed and Cochrane libraries. RESULTS We selected nine studies between 2008 and 2021. Two hundred sixty-two patients were included. One hundred thirty-one patients underwent simultaneous resections. The mean blood loss was 309.4 ml (range, 200-450 ml), the mean operative time was 250.5 min (range, 198.5-449.0 min). The mean length of hospital stay was 7.98 days (range, 4.5 to 12 days). The overall postoperative mortality was 0.4%. The overall morbidity rate was 37.0%, Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complications were 8.4%. The mean 3-year overall survival was 55.25% (range, 44.4-66.1%), the mean 3-year disease free survival was 37% (range, 33.3-41.9%) CONCLUSION: We can conclude that robotic-assisted surgery might be considered as a technical upgrade option for minimally invasive approach to CRCLM resections even for simultaneous operations and challenging cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Rocca
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Andrea Scacchi
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Micaela Cappuccio
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Pasquale Avella
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences "V. Tiberio", University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Walter Bugiantella
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista, Foligno, Italy
| | - Michele De Rosa
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista, Foligno, Italy
| | - Gianluca Costa
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, St Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Polistena
- UOC General Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery, Department of Surgery "P. Valdoni", Sapienza, University of Study of Rome, University Policlinic Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Codacci-Pisanelli
- UOC General Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery, Department of Surgery "P. Valdoni", Sapienza, University of Study of Rome, University Policlinic Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Amato
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Fabio Carbone
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Università di Napoli - "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Graziano Ceccarelli
- General Surgery Department, ASL 2 Umbria, San Giovanni Battista, Foligno, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nationwide oncological networks for resection of colorectal liver metastases in the Netherlands: Differences and postoperative outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 48:435-448. [PMID: 34801321 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Widespread differences in patient demographics and disease burden between hospitals for resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) have been described. In the Netherlands, networks consisting of at least one tertiary referral centre and several regional hospitals have been established to optimize treatment and outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess variation in case-mix, and outcomes between these networks. METHODS This was a population-based study including all patients who underwent CRLM resection in the Netherlands between 2014 and 2019. Variation in case-mix and outcomes between seven networks covering the whole country was evaluated. Differences in case-mix, expected 30-day major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥3a) and 30-day mortality between networks were assessed. RESULTS In total 5383 patients were included. Thirty-day major morbidity was 5.7% and 30-day mortality was 1.5%. Significant differences between networks were observed for Charlson Comorbidity Index, ASA 3+, previous liver resection, liver disease, preoperative MRI, preoperative chemotherapy, ≥3 CRLM, diameter of largest CRLM ≥55 mm, major resection, combined resection and ablation, rectal primary tumour, bilobar and extrahepatic disease. Uncorrected 30-day major morbidity ranged between 3.3% and 13.1% for hospitals, 30-day mortality ranged between 0.0% and 4.5%. Uncorrected 30-day major morbidity ranged between 4.4% and 6.0% for networks, 30-day mortality ranged between 0.0% and 2.5%. No negative outliers were observed after case-mix correction. CONCLUSION Variation in case-mix and outcomes are considerably smaller on a network level as compared to a hospital level. Therefore, auditing is more meaningful at a network level and collaboration of hospitals within networks should be pursued.
Collapse
|
15
|
The Italian Consensus on minimally invasive simultaneous resections for synchronous liver metastasis and primary colorectal cancer: A Delphi methodology. Updates Surg 2021; 73:1247-1265. [PMID: 34089501 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01100-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
At the time of diagnosis synchronous colorectal cancer, liver metastases (SCRLM) account for 15-25% of patients. If primary tumour and synchronous liver metastases are resectable, good results may be achieved performing surgical treatment incorporated into the chemotherapy regimen. So far, the possibility of simultaneous minimally invasive (MI) surgery for SCRLM has not been extensively investigated. The Italian surgical community has captured the need and undertaken the effort to establish a National Consensus on this topic. Four main areas of interest have been analysed: patients' selection, procedures, techniques, and implementations. To establish consensus, an adapted Delphi method was used through as many reiterative rounds were needed. Systematic literature reviews were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses instructions. The Consensus took place between February 2019 and July 2020. Twenty-six Italian centres participated. Eighteen clinically relevant items were identified. After a total of three Delphi rounds, 30-tree recommendations reached expert consensus establishing the herein presented guidelines. The Italian Consensus on MI surgery for SCRLM indicates possible pathways to optimise the treatment for these patients as consensus papers express a trend that is likely to become shortly a standard procedure for clinical pictures still on debate. As matter of fact, no RCT or relevant case series on simultaneous treatment of SCRLM are available in the literature to suggest guidelines. It remains to be investigated whether the MI technique for the simultaneous treatment of SCRLM maintain the already documented benefit of the two separate surgeries.
Collapse
|
16
|
Giani A, Cipriani F, Famularo S, Donadon M, Bernasconi DP, Ardito F, Fazio F, Nicolini D, Perri P, Giuffrida M, Pontarolo N, Zanello M, Lai Q, Conci S, Molfino S, Germani P, Pinotti E, Romano M, La Barba G, Ferrari C, Patauner S, Manzoni A, Sciannamea I, Fumagalli L, Troci A, Ferraro V, Floridi A, Romano F, Ciulli C, Braga M, Ratti F, Costa G, Razionale F, Russolillo N, Marinelli L, De Peppo V, Cremaschi E, Calabrese F, Larghi Laureiro Z, Lazzari G, Cosola D, Montuori M, Salvador L, Cucchetti A, Franceschi A, Ciola M, Sega V, Calcagno P, Pennacchi L, Tedeschi M, Memeo R, Crespi M, Chiarelli M, Antonucci A, Zimmitti G, Frena A, Percivale A, Ercolani G, Zanus G, Zago M, Tarchi P, Baiocchi GL, Ruzzenente A, Rossi M, Jovine E, Maestri M, Dalla Valle R, Grazi GL, Vivarelli M, Ferrero A, Giuliante F, Torzilli G, Aldrighetti L, Gianotti L. Performance of Comprehensive Complication Index and Clavien-Dindo Complication Scoring System in Liver Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E3868. [PMID: 33371419 PMCID: PMC7767420 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to assess the ability of comprehensive complication index (CCI) and Clavien-Dindo complication (CDC) scale to predict excessive length of hospital stay (e-LOS) in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS Patients were identified from an Italian multi-institutional database and randomly selected to be included in either a derivation or validation set. Multivariate logistic regression models and ROC curve analysis including either CCI or CDC as predictors of e-LOS were fitted to compare predictive performance. E-LOS was defined as a LOS longer than the 75th percentile among patients with at least one complication. RESULTS A total of 2669 patients were analyzed (1345 for derivation and 1324 for validation). The odds ratio (OR) was 5.590 (95%CI 4.201; 7.438) for CCI and 5.507 (4.152; 7.304) for CDC. The AUC was 0.964 for CCI and 0.893 for CDC in the derivation set and 0.962 vs. 0.890 in the validation set, respectively. In patients with at least two complications, the OR was 2.793 (1.896; 4.115) for CCI and 2.439 (1.666; 3.570) for CDC with an AUC of 0.850 and 0.673, respectively in the derivation cohort. The AUC was 0.806 for CCI and 0.658 for CDC in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS When reporting postoperative morbidity in liver surgery, CCI is a preferable scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Giani
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (A.G.); (S.F.); (F.R.); (C.C.); (M.B.)
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (F.C.); (F.R.); (L.A.)
| | - Simone Famularo
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (A.G.); (S.F.); (F.R.); (C.C.); (M.B.)
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Humanitas University, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (M.D.); (G.C.); (G.T.)
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Humanitas University, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (M.D.); (G.C.); (G.T.)
| | - Davide Paolo Bernasconi
- Bicocca Bioinformatics Biostatistics and Bioimaging Centre-B4, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy;
| | - Francesco Ardito
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00118 Rome, Italy; (F.A.); (F.R.); (F.G.)
| | - Federico Fazio
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital “Umberto I”, 10112 Turin, Italy; (F.F.); (N.R.); (A.F.)
| | - Daniele Nicolini
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy; (D.N.); (L.M.); (M.V.)
| | - Pasquale Perri
- Division of Hepatobiliarypancreatic surgery, IRCCS—Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00119 Rome, Italy; (P.P.); (V.D.P.); (G.L.G.)
| | - Mario Giuffrida
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (M.G.); (E.C.); (R.D.V.)
| | - Nicholas Pontarolo
- Unit of General Surgery 1, University of Pavia and Foundation IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (N.P.); (F.C.); (M.M.)
| | - Matteo Zanello
- Department of Surgery, AOU Sant’Orsola Malpighi, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, 40141 Bologna, Italy; (M.Z.); (E.J.)
| | - Quirino Lai
- Hepatobiliary and Organ Transplantation Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, 00118 Rome, Italy; (Q.L.); (Z.L.L.); (M.R.)
| | - Simone Conci
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, 37121 Verona, Italy; (S.C.); (G.L.); (A.R.)
| | - Sarah Molfino
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25136 Brescia, Italy; (S.M.); (G.L.B.)
| | - Paola Germani
- Department of General Surgery, ASUGI, University Hospital of Trieste, 34121 Trieste, Italy; (P.G.); (D.C.); (P.T.)
| | - Enrico Pinotti
- Department of Surgery, Ponte San Pietro Hospital, 24129 Bergamo, Italy; (E.P.); (M.M.); (M.Z.)
| | - Maurizio Romano
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Science (DISCOG), University of Padua; Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit—Treviso Hospital, 31102 Treviso Italy; (M.R.); (L.S.); (G.Z.)
| | - Giuliano La Barba
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, 47122 Forlì, Italy; (G.L.B.); (A.C.); (G.E.)
| | - Cecilia Ferrari
- HPB Surgical Unit, San Paolo Hospital, 17100 Savona, Italy; (C.F.); (A.F.); (A.P.)
| | - Stefan Patauner
- Department of Surgery, Bolzano Central Hospital, 39100 Bolzano, Italy; (S.P.); (M.C.); (A.F.)
| | - Alberto Manzoni
- Department of General Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, 25136 Brescia, Italy; (A.M.); (V.S.); (G.Z.)
| | - Ivano Sciannamea
- Department of Surgery, Monza Polyclinic, 20900 Monza, Italy; (I.S.); (A.A.)
| | - Luca Fumagalli
- Department of Emergency and Robotic Surgery, ASST Lecco, 23900 Lecco, Italy; (L.F.); (P.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Albert Troci
- Department of Surgery, L. Sacco Hospital, 20143 Milan, Italy; (A.T.); (L.P.); (M.C.)
| | - Valentina Ferraro
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, Miulli Hospital, 70132 Bari, Italy; (V.F.); (M.T.); (R.M.)
| | - Antonio Floridi
- Department of General Surgery, ASST Crema, 26013 Crema, Italy;
| | - Fabrizio Romano
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (A.G.); (S.F.); (F.R.); (C.C.); (M.B.)
- HPB Unit, Department of Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Cristina Ciulli
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (A.G.); (S.F.); (F.R.); (C.C.); (M.B.)
- HPB Unit, Department of Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Marco Braga
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (A.G.); (S.F.); (F.R.); (C.C.); (M.B.)
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (F.C.); (F.R.); (L.A.)
| | - Guido Costa
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Humanitas University, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (M.D.); (G.C.); (G.T.)
| | - Francesco Razionale
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00118 Rome, Italy; (F.A.); (F.R.); (F.G.)
| | - Nadia Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital “Umberto I”, 10112 Turin, Italy; (F.F.); (N.R.); (A.F.)
| | - Laura Marinelli
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy; (D.N.); (L.M.); (M.V.)
| | - Valerio De Peppo
- Division of Hepatobiliarypancreatic surgery, IRCCS—Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00119 Rome, Italy; (P.P.); (V.D.P.); (G.L.G.)
| | - Elena Cremaschi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (M.G.); (E.C.); (R.D.V.)
| | - Francesco Calabrese
- Unit of General Surgery 1, University of Pavia and Foundation IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (N.P.); (F.C.); (M.M.)
| | - Zoe Larghi Laureiro
- Hepatobiliary and Organ Transplantation Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, 00118 Rome, Italy; (Q.L.); (Z.L.L.); (M.R.)
| | - Giovanni Lazzari
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, 37121 Verona, Italy; (S.C.); (G.L.); (A.R.)
| | - Davide Cosola
- Department of General Surgery, ASUGI, University Hospital of Trieste, 34121 Trieste, Italy; (P.G.); (D.C.); (P.T.)
| | - Mauro Montuori
- Department of Surgery, Ponte San Pietro Hospital, 24129 Bergamo, Italy; (E.P.); (M.M.); (M.Z.)
| | - Luca Salvador
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Science (DISCOG), University of Padua; Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit—Treviso Hospital, 31102 Treviso Italy; (M.R.); (L.S.); (G.Z.)
| | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, 47122 Forlì, Italy; (G.L.B.); (A.C.); (G.E.)
| | - Angelo Franceschi
- HPB Surgical Unit, San Paolo Hospital, 17100 Savona, Italy; (C.F.); (A.F.); (A.P.)
| | - Michele Ciola
- Department of Surgery, Bolzano Central Hospital, 39100 Bolzano, Italy; (S.P.); (M.C.); (A.F.)
| | - Valentina Sega
- Department of General Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, 25136 Brescia, Italy; (A.M.); (V.S.); (G.Z.)
| | - Pietro Calcagno
- Department of Emergency and Robotic Surgery, ASST Lecco, 23900 Lecco, Italy; (L.F.); (P.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Luca Pennacchi
- Department of Surgery, L. Sacco Hospital, 20143 Milan, Italy; (A.T.); (L.P.); (M.C.)
| | - Michele Tedeschi
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, Miulli Hospital, 70132 Bari, Italy; (V.F.); (M.T.); (R.M.)
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, Miulli Hospital, 70132 Bari, Italy; (V.F.); (M.T.); (R.M.)
| | - Michele Crespi
- Department of Surgery, L. Sacco Hospital, 20143 Milan, Italy; (A.T.); (L.P.); (M.C.)
| | - Marco Chiarelli
- Department of Emergency and Robotic Surgery, ASST Lecco, 23900 Lecco, Italy; (L.F.); (P.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Adelmo Antonucci
- Department of Surgery, Monza Polyclinic, 20900 Monza, Italy; (I.S.); (A.A.)
| | - Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of General Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, 25136 Brescia, Italy; (A.M.); (V.S.); (G.Z.)
| | - Antonio Frena
- Department of Surgery, Bolzano Central Hospital, 39100 Bolzano, Italy; (S.P.); (M.C.); (A.F.)
| | - Andrea Percivale
- HPB Surgical Unit, San Paolo Hospital, 17100 Savona, Italy; (C.F.); (A.F.); (A.P.)
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, 47122 Forlì, Italy; (G.L.B.); (A.C.); (G.E.)
| | - Giacomo Zanus
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Science (DISCOG), University of Padua; Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit—Treviso Hospital, 31102 Treviso Italy; (M.R.); (L.S.); (G.Z.)
| | - Mauro Zago
- Department of Surgery, Ponte San Pietro Hospital, 24129 Bergamo, Italy; (E.P.); (M.M.); (M.Z.)
- Department of Emergency and Robotic Surgery, ASST Lecco, 23900 Lecco, Italy; (L.F.); (P.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Paola Tarchi
- Department of General Surgery, ASUGI, University Hospital of Trieste, 34121 Trieste, Italy; (P.G.); (D.C.); (P.T.)
| | - Gian Luca Baiocchi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25136 Brescia, Italy; (S.M.); (G.L.B.)
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, 37121 Verona, Italy; (S.C.); (G.L.); (A.R.)
| | - Massimo Rossi
- Hepatobiliary and Organ Transplantation Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Umberto I Polyclinic of Rome, 00118 Rome, Italy; (Q.L.); (Z.L.L.); (M.R.)
| | - Elio Jovine
- Department of Surgery, AOU Sant’Orsola Malpighi, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, 40141 Bologna, Italy; (M.Z.); (E.J.)
| | - Marcello Maestri
- Unit of General Surgery 1, University of Pavia and Foundation IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (N.P.); (F.C.); (M.M.)
| | - Raffaele Dalla Valle
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (M.G.); (E.C.); (R.D.V.)
| | - Gian Luca Grazi
- Division of Hepatobiliarypancreatic surgery, IRCCS—Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00119 Rome, Italy; (P.P.); (V.D.P.); (G.L.G.)
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60121 Ancona, Italy; (D.N.); (L.M.); (M.V.)
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital “Umberto I”, 10112 Turin, Italy; (F.F.); (N.R.); (A.F.)
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00118 Rome, Italy; (F.A.); (F.R.); (F.G.)
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Humanitas University, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy; (M.D.); (G.C.); (G.T.)
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (F.C.); (F.R.); (L.A.)
| | - Luca Gianotti
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy; (A.G.); (S.F.); (F.R.); (C.C.); (M.B.)
- HPB Unit, Department of Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, 20900 Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Franchi E, Donadon M, Torzilli G. Effects of volume on outcome in hepatobiliary surgery: a review with guidelines proposal. Glob Health Med 2020; 2:292-297. [PMID: 33330823 DOI: 10.35772/ghm.2020.01013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The positive relationship between volume and outcome in hepatobiliary surgery has been demonstrated for many years. As for other complex surgical procedures, both improved short- and long-term outcomes have been associated with a higher volume of procedures. However, whether the centralization of complex hepatobiliary procedures makes full sense because it should be associated with higher quality of care, as reported in the literature, precise criteria on what to centralize, where to centralize, and who should be entitled to perform complex procedures are still missing. Indeed, despite the generalized consensus on centralization in hepatobiliary surgery, this topic remains very complex because many determinants are involved in such a centralization process, of which some of them cannot be easily controlled. In the context of different health systems worldwide, such as national health systems and private insurance, there are different stakeholders that demand different needs: politicians, patients, surgeons, institutions and medical associations do not always have the same needs. Starting from a review of the literature on centralization in hepatobiliary surgery, we will propose some guidelines that, while not data-driven due to low evidence in the literature, will be based on good clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eloisa Franchi
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Donadon
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Division of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Stevens CL, Reid JL, Babidge WJ, Maddern GJ. Peer review of mortality after hepatectomy in Australia. HPB (Oxford) 2020; 22:611-621. [PMID: 31558369 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2019] [Revised: 08/27/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The data within the Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality (ANZASM) provides a unique opportunity to consider the contributing factors to perioperative deaths as determined by peer review. Consideration of the factors contributing to mortality after hepatectomy can provide greater insight into how deaths can be prevented. The objective of this study was to determine the reasons for patient deaths post-hepatectomy in Australia. METHODS ANZASM data from 1 January 2010 to 30 Jun 2017 was reviewed and all deaths following hepatectomy were selected for analysis. Assessors determinations of whether management could have been improved were reviewed, and then classified into groups of significant clinical events using thematic analysis with a data driven approach. RESULTS The study included 88 deaths reported to ANZASM after hepatectomy. The assessors questioned the decision to operate in 23/88 (25%) patients with a further nine (10%) patients insufficiently investigated prior to resection. ANZASM assessors determined that there was a delay in recognising a significant complication in 16/88 (18%) patients. CONCLUSION Multi-disciplinary decision making is strongly recommended when deciding which patients to treat with hepatic resection. Optimal care post-hepatectomy includes early recognition of complications and enactment of an adequate rescue plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire L Stevens
- Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Australia.
| | - Jessica L Reid
- Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Australia
| | - Wendy J Babidge
- Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Australia
| | - Guy J Maddern
- Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Olthof PB, Elfrink AKE, Marra E, Belt EJT, van den Boezem PB, Bosscha K, Consten ECJ, den Dulk M, Gobardhan PD, Hagendoorn J, van Heek TNT, IJzermans JNM, Klaase JM, Kuhlmann KFD, Leclercq WKG, Liem MSL, Manusama ER, Marsman HA, Mieog JSD, Oosterling SJ, Patijn GA, Te Riele W, Swijnenburg RJ, Torrenga H, van Duijvendijk P, Vermaas M, Kok NFM, Grünhagen DJ. Volume-outcome relationship of liver surgery: a nationwide analysis. Br J Surg 2020; 107:917-926. [PMID: 32207856 PMCID: PMC7384098 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Evidence for an association between hospital volume and outcomes for liver surgery is abundant. The current Dutch guideline requires a minimum volume of 20 annual procedures per centre. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between hospital volume and postoperative outcomes using data from the nationwide Dutch Hepato Biliary Audit. Methods This was a nationwide study in the Netherlands. All liver resections reported in the Dutch Hepato Biliary Audit between 2014 and 2017 were included. Annual centre volume was calculated and classified in categories of 20 procedures per year. Main outcomes were major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo grade IIIA or higher) and 30‐day or in‐hospital mortality. Results A total of 5590 liver resections were done across 34 centres with a median annual centre volume of 35 (i.q.r. 20–69) procedures. Overall major morbidity and mortality rates were 11·2 and 2·0 per cent respectively. The mortality rate was 1·9 per cent after resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs), 1·2 per cent for non‐CRLMs, 0·4 per cent for benign tumours, 4·9 per cent for hepatocellular carcinoma and 10·3 per cent for biliary tumours. Higher‐volume centres performed more major liver resections, and more resections for hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary cancer. There was no association between hospital volume and either major morbidity or mortality in multivariable analysis, after adjustment for known risk factors for adverse events. Conclusion Hospital volume and postoperative outcomes were not associated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A K E Elfrink
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - E Marra
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - E J T Belt
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - P B van den Boezem
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - K Bosscha
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's- Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - E C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - M den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - P D Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - J Hagendoorn
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - T N T van Heek
- Department of Surgery, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Ede, the Netherlands
| | - J N M IJzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - K F D Kuhlmann
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W K G Leclercq
- Department of Surgery, Máxima Medisch Centrum, Veldhoven, the Netherlands
| | - M S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - E R Manusama
- Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwardena, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - H A Marsman
- Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J S D Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - S J Oosterling
- Department of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands
| | - G A Patijn
- Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Zwollea, the Netherlands
| | - W Te Riele
- Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - R-J Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H Torrenga
- Department of Surgery, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - P van Duijvendijk
- Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Zwollea, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Gelre Hospital Apeldoorn, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
| | - M Vermaas
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | - N F M Kok
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Viganò L, Cimino M, Aldrighetti L, Ferrero A, Cillo U, Guglielmi A, Ettorre GM, Giuliante F, Dalla Valle R, Mazzaferro V, Jovine E, De Carlis L, Calise F, Torzilli G, Ratti F, Gringeri E, Russolillo N, Levi Sandri GB, Ardito F, Boggi U, Gruttadauria S, Di Benedetto F, Rossi GE, Berti S, Ceccarelli G, Vincenti L, Belli G, Zamboni F, Coratti A, Mezzatesta P, Santambrogio R, Navarra G, Giuliani A, Pinna AD, Parisi A, Colledan M, Slim A, Antonucci A, Grazi GL, Frena A, Sgroi G, Brolese A, Morelli L, Floridi A, Patriti A, Veneroni L, Boni L, Maida P, Griseri G, Filauro M, Guerriero S, Tisone G, Romito R, Tedeschi U, Zimmitti G. Multicentre evaluation of case volume in minimally invasive hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2019; 107:443-451. [PMID: 32167174 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Revised: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Surgical outcomes may be associated with hospital volume and the influence of volume on minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) is not known.
Methods
Patients entered into the prospective registry of the Italian Group of MILS from 2014 to 2018 were considered. Only centres with an accrual period of at least 12 months and stable MILS activity during the enrolment period were included. Case volume was defined by the mean number of minimally invasive liver resections performed per month (MILS/month).
Results
A total of 2225 MILS operations were undertaken by 46 centres; nine centres performed more than two MILS/month (1376 patients) and 37 centres carried out two or fewer MILS/month (849 patients). The proportion of resections of anterolateral segments decreased with case volume, whereas that of major hepatectomies increased. Left lateral sectionectomies and resections of anterolateral segments had similar outcome in the two groups. Resections of posterosuperior segments and major hepatectomies had higher overall and severe morbidity rates in centres performing two or fewer MILS/month than in those undertaking a larger number (posterosuperior segments resections: overall morbidity 30·4 versus 18·7 per cent respectively, and severe morbidity 9·9 versus 4·0 per cent; left hepatectomy: 46 versus 22 per cent, and 19 versus 5 per cent; right hepatectomy: 42 versus 34 per cent, and 25 versus 15 per cent).
Conclusion
A volume–outcome association existed for minimally invasive hepatectomy. Complex and major resections may be best managed in high-volume centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Viganò
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| | - M Cimino
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| | - L Aldrighetti
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - A Ferrero
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - U Cillo
- Hepato-Biliary and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - A Guglielmi
- Department of Surgery, Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - G M Ettorre
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - F Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, A. Gemelli Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - R Dalla Valle
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - V Mazzaferro
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - E Jovine
- Department of Surgery, Maggiore Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - L De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - F Calise
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Pinetagrande Hospital, Castelvolturno, Italy
| | - G Torzilli
- Department of Hepatobiliary and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| | - F Ratti
- Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan
| | | | | | | | | | - U Boggi
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria (AOU) Pisana, Pisa
| | - S Gruttadauria
- Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione, Palermo
| | | | - G E Rossi
- Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan
| | - S Berti
- Ospedale Civile S. Andrea, La Spezia
| | | | | | - G Belli
- Ospedale Santa Maria di Loreto Nuovo, Naples
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - A D Pinna
- Policlinico Sant'Orsola Malpighi, Bologne
| | | | | | - A Slim
- AO Desio e Vimercate, Vimercate
| | | | - G L Grazi
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena, Rome
| | | | - G Sgroi
- AO Treviglio-Caravaggio, Treviglio
| | | | | | | | - A Patriti
- Ospedale San Matteo degli Infermi, Spoleto
| | | | - L Boni
- AOU Fondazione Macchi, Varese
| | - P Maida
- Ospedale Villa Betania, Naples
| | | | | | | | | | - R Romito
- AOU Maggiore della Carità, Novara
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lassen K, Nymo LS, Olsen F, Brudvik KW, Fretland ÅA, Søreide K. Contemporary practice and short-term outcomes after liver resections in a complete national cohort. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2018; 404:11-19. [PMID: 30519886 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-018-1737-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improved outcome after liver resections have been reported in several series, but outcomes from national cohorts are scarce. Our aim was to evaluate nationwide practice and short-term outcomes after liver surgery in a universal healthcare system. METHODS A complete 5-year cohort of all liver resections from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR). Short-term outcomes were aggregated length of stay (a-LoS), reoperation and 90-day mortality. RESULTS Of 2118 liver resections, 605 (28.6%) were major, median age was 65 years and 1184 (55%) were male. Most common indication was metastatic disease (n = 1554; 73.4%) and primary malignancy (n = 328; 15.3%). Laparoscopy was performed in 513 (33.9%) of minor and 37 (6.1%) of major liver resections and increased over time to 39.1% of minor resections in 2016. Median a-LoS was 12 days for major resections, 8 days for open minor and 3 days for laparoscopic minor resections. Reoperation was reported for 159 (7.4%) and 90-day mortality for 44 (2.1%). Primary malignancy, male gender, elderly patients and major resections were associated with poorer outcome. CONCLUSIONS In a national cohort, laparoscopy is used for a substantial proportion of minor resections and was associated with reduced a-LoS. Risk factors for reoperation and mortality were male gender, increased age and major resection for primary malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristoffer Lassen
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital at Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway. .,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway. .,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.
| | - Linn Såve Nymo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Frank Olsen
- Centre for Clinical Documentation and Evaluation (SKDE), Northern Norway Regional Health Authority, Bodo, Norway
| | - Kristoffer Watten Brudvik
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital at Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway
| | - Åsmund Avdem Fretland
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital at Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0372, Oslo, Norway.,The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- Clinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Stevens CL, Babidge WJ, Maddern GJ. Variability of perioperative mortality of hepatic resection in Australia. ANZ J Surg 2018; 88:1022-1027. [DOI: 10.1111/ans.14408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2017] [Revised: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 01/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Claire L. Stevens
- Discipline of Surgery; The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - Wendy J. Babidge
- Australia and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality; Royal Australasian College of Surgeons; Adelaide South Australia Australia
| | - Guy J. Maddern
- Australia and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality; Royal Australasian College of Surgeons; Adelaide South Australia Australia
| |
Collapse
|