Costs and Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Atopic Dermatitis Using Advanced Therapies in the United States: Analysis of a Retrospective Claims Database

Strategic Approaches to Reducing the Burden of Atopic Dermatitis in the Middle East and Africa Region

OBJECTIVES

Atopic dermatitis (AD) creates a significant burden on patients and society. This study proposes a set of health policy interventions that can reduce the burden of AD in the Middle East and Africa.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review to find relevant actions that have been implemented or recommended to decrease AD burden globally. An expert panel was conducted to discuss the review findings, then experts were surveyed to suggest the most efficient actions. Finally, survey results and recommendations were formulated into key actions to reduce the burden in the Middle East and Africa region.

RESULTS

Recommended actions were related to 5 domains; capacity building, guidelines, research, public awareness, and patient support and education. Several actions related to each domain can help reduce the burden. One of the most advocated recommendations was investing in patient education through trained healthcare professionals. Understanding the disease and learning how to control it is a key cornerstone to treatment optimization and reducing the burden. Multidisciplinary care, publishing defined therapeutic guidelines, and investing in research were the most recommended actions based on the experts' discussion and survey results.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the burden of AD is the highest among dermatological diseases, a well-grounded action plan has the potential to reduce the disease burden. Decision makers may develop a national AD action plan by selecting the most relevant items of this study based on their potential impact, feasibility, timeliness, and affordability.

Targeted Systemic Therapies for Adults with Atopic Dermatitis: Selecting from Biologics and JAK Inhibitors

Therapeutic options for people with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis refractory to topical therapy have rapidly expanded in recent years. These new targeted immunomodulatory agents-biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors-have each demonstrated high levels of efficacy and acceptable safety in mostly placebo-controlled clinical trials for atopic dermatitis, but there is no universally applicable algorithm to help choose between them for a given patient. Hence, patients and physicians should utilize shared decision making, discussing efficacy, safety, mode of delivery, monitoring, costs, speed of onset, and other factors to reach individualized treatment decisions. In this review, we try to aid shared decision making by summarizing the efficacy, safety, and monitoring of biologics and oral JAK inhibitors for adults with atopic dermatitis. Network meta-analyses suggest that higher doses of abrocitinib and upadacitinib are more effective than biologics. They also show that, among biologics, dupilumab is likely more effective than tralokinumab and lebrikizumab. Biologics are generally considered safer than JAK inhibitors, although concerns about JAK inhibitors are mainly extrapolated from older generation JAK inhibitors used in higher-risk populations. We also outline evidence and considerations for choosing and using systemic immunomodulatory treatments for special populations including pregnant individuals, those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B and C, end stage kidney disease, and older adults.

Economic Burden among Patients with Vitiligo in the United States: A Retrospective Database Claims Study

Patients with vitiligo incur direct and indirect costs associated with their condition; however, data regarding the economic burden of vitiligo are scarce and outdated. In this retrospective cohort analysis of the Merative MarketScan Commercial Database, healthcare costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) were evaluated among United States patients with vitiligo. Patients with vitiligo were matched (1:2) with individuals without vitiligo (controls) between January 2007 and December 2021. Outcomes included all-cause and vitiligo-related costs (2021 dollars) and all-cause HCRU, including mental health-related HCRU, during a 1-year postindex period. Subgroup analyses were completed for patients on vitiligo treatments with systemic effects (such as phototherapy and oral steroids) or a new mental health diagnosis. The analysis was focused solely on direct costs. Baseline demographics were well-balanced between matched vitiligo (49,512) and control (99,024) cohorts. Patients with vitiligo incurred significantly higher all-cause ($15,551 vs $7735) and vitiligo-related ($3490 vs $54) costs than controls (P < .0001). All-cause and mental health-related HCRU were also significantly higher among patients with vitiligo (P < .0001). Differences in all-cause and vitiligo-related healthcare costs remained significantly higher in patients on treatments with systemic effects/mental health diagnoses than in controls (P < .0001). Taken together, healthcare costs and HCRU were significantly higher among patients with vitiligo than among controls.

Nonsteroidal Approaches for Atopic Dermatitis: A Clinical Update

Topical corticosteroids (TCSs) are the most widely used treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD), but they can have adverse effects such as skin atrophy, telangiectasias, and hypopigmentation, especially with prolonged use of higher potency steroids. Many patients also have a fear of using TCSs, known as "corticophobia." With the development of biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors, a nonsteroidal approach to the treatment of AD may be possible and may be preferred by certain patients. Given what is known about these nonsteroidal therapies, we propose a structured treatment ladder and action plan that can guide clinicians and patients on the use of these therapies for the treatment of AD. The ladder divides nonsteroidal medication classes into treatments for exacerbation versus maintenance therapies in an escalating order of increasing potential for adverse effects, both real and perceived. This treatment algorithm proposal paves the way for a potential nonsteroidal approach to managing AD.

Are Antimicrobial Peptides a 21st-Century Solution for Atopic Dermatitis?

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder that is the result of various environmental, bacterial and genetic stimuli, which culminate in the disruption of the skin's barrier function. Characterized by highly pruritic skin lesions, xerosis and an array of comorbidities among which skin infections are the most common, this condition results in both a significant loss of quality of life and in the need for life-long treatments (e.g., corticosteroids, monoclonal antibodies and regular antibiotic intake), all of which may have harmful secondary effects. This, in conjunction with AD's rising prevalence, made the development of alternative treatment strategies the focus of both the scientific community and the pharmaceutical industry. Given their potential to both manage the skin microbiome, fight infections and even modulate the local immune response, the use of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) from more diverse origins has become one of the most promising alternative solutions for AD management, with some being already used with some success towards this end. However, their production and use also exhibit some limitations. The current work seeks to compile the available information and provide a better understanding of the state of the art in the understanding of AMPs' true potential in addressing AD.

Treatment Patterns among Patients with Atopic Dermatitis in Secondary Care: A National, Observational, Non-interventional, Retrospective Study in Sweden

This non-interventional, observational, longitudinal study describes treatment patterns of atopic dermatitis (AD) in Sweden. Data from 3 Swedish registries were merged, and included patients who received an AD diagnosis (during the period 1997 to 2019) and had AD treatment prescribed (during the period 2006 to 2020). Treatment persistence, treatment sequencing, time-to-event analysis, and 12-month prevalence were analysed. Overall, data for 99,885 patients with AD were included, of whom 4,086 (4.1%) received systemic treatments. Median persistence rates were 12.6 (95% CI 11.9, 13.4) months for methotrexate, 10.8 (9.1, 13.0) months for azathioprine, 5.6 (3.8, 6.2) months for mycophenolate, 5.1 (4.4, 5.7) months for alitretinoin and 3.4 (3.2, 3.7) months for cyclosporine. Median (Q1, Q3) time from first secondary care visit for AD to first systemic treatment was 5.8 (2.2, 11.0) years overall and 4.4 (1.3, 9.1) years in the Stockholm region. Methotrexate was a prominent first- and second-line treatment used during the period 2006 to 2020. Dupilumab was introduced during the study period and was increasingly used as first- or second-line therapy over time. The 12-month prevalence of AD generally remained steady, with a gradual increase observed over time for the overall population. A steep increase was observed in Stockholm from 2011. This study shows that a small proportion of patients with AD are offered systemic treatments in Sweden, with long periods in secondary care prior to systemic treatments and low persistence on systemic treatments. Regional differences highlight a need for national treat ment guidelines.

Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Resource Utilization Among Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using German Health Claims Data

Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease. Many patients are initiating a systemic therapy, if the disease is not adequately controlled with topical treatment only. Currently, there is little real-world evidence on the AD-related medical care situation in Germany. This study analyzed patient characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with systemically treated AD for the German healthcare system.

Methods

In this descriptive, retrospective cohort study, aggregated anonymized German health claims data from the InGef research database were used. Within a representative sample of four million insured individuals, patients with AD and systemic drug therapy initiation (SDTI) in the index year 2017 were identified and included into the study cohort. Systemic drug therapy included dupilumab, systemic corticosteroids (SCS) and systemic immunosuppressants (SIS). Patients were observed for one year starting from the date of SDTI in 2017.

Results

9975 patients were included (57.8% female, mean age 39.6 years [SD 25.5]). In the one-year observation period, the most common systemic drug therapy was SCS (> 99.0%). Administrations of dupilumab (0.3%) or dispensations of SIS were rare (cyclosporine: 0.5%, azathioprine: 0.6%, methotrexate: 0.1%). Median treatment duration of SCS, cyclosporine and azathioprine was 27 days, 102 days, and 109 days, respectively. 2.8% of the patients received phototherapy; 41.6% used topical corticosteroids and/or topical calcineurin inhibitor. Average annual costs for medications amounted to € 1237 per patient. Outpatient services were used by 99.6% with associated mean annual costs of € 943; 25.4% had at least one hospitalization (mean annual costs: € 5836). 5.3% of adult patients received sickness benefits with associated mean annual costs of € 5026.

Conclusions

Despite unfavorable risk–benefit profile, this study demonstrated a common treatment with SCS, whereas other systemic drug therapy options were rarely used. Furthermore, the results suggest a substantial economic burden for patients with AD and SDTI.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-022-00773-3.

Real-World Effectiveness of Newly Initiated Systemic Therapy for Atopic Dermatitis in the United States: A Claims Database Analysis

Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with significant quality-of-life and economic burdens. Real-world evidence is needed to identify optimal treatment pathways for AD. Here we evaluate real-world effectiveness of systemic therapies for moderate-to-severe AD in the USA.

Methods

Data (September 2016 to December 2019) were from the IQVIA Health Plan Claims data set (IQVIA, Danbury, CT) from patients aged 12 years or older with AD (ICD-9/10-CM, 691.8/L20.x) initiating a systemic immunosuppressive (SIS) agent (methotrexate, cyclosporine, mycophenolate, or azathioprine) or dupilumab and continuously enrolled for at least 6 months before and after the index date. Indicators of non-response (i.e., adding on/switching systemic therapy, AD-related inpatient/emergency room visits, or incident staphylococcal/streptococcal skin infection) and predictors of non-response were evaluated. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan–Meier rates and times were obtained; Cox regression models were used.

Results

In 3249 patients, 45.4% exhibited at least one indicator of non-response, with median time to non-response being longer for dupilumab than for any SIS therapy (27.0 vs 4.0–7.7 months, respectively). Key non-response predictors were age, geographic region, and baseline number of annual AD-related medical visits.

Conclusion

Non-response was common in patients with AD who required systemic treatment, and non-response indicators occurred significantly more frequently with SIS treatment than with dupilumab treatment.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02197-z.

Comparative efficacy and safety of abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a network meta-analysis

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have become promising treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD), however no study directly comparing JAK inhibitors with each other has been reported. We conducted this network meta‐analysis to determine the comparative efficacy and safety of three common oral JAK inhibitors including abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib for moderate‐to‐severe AD. We first identified eligible studies from published meta‐analyzes, then we searched PubMed to obtain additional studies published between February and July 2021. Clinical efficacy and safety were evaluated as primary and secondary outcome, respectively. After extracting data and assessing methodological quality, we utilized ADDIS 1.4 software to conduct pair‐wise and network meta‐analyzes. Ten eligible studies were included in the final analysis. Pooled results that abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib obtained higher investigator global assessment (IGA), eczema area, and severity index (EASI) response, however abrocitinib and upadacitinib caused more treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) regardless of doses, compared with placebo. Network meta‐analyzes revealed that upadacitinib 30 mg was superior to all regimens and upadacitinib 15 mg was better than remaining regimens except for abrocitinib 200 mg in terms of IGA and EASI response. Moreover, abrocitinib 200 mg was superior to abrocitinib 100 mg, baricitinib 1 mg, 2 mg, and 4 mg for clinical efficacy. However, upadacitinib 30 mg caused more TEAEs. Abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib were consistently effective therapies in adult and adolescent patients with AD; however, upadacitinib 30 mg may be the optimal option in short‐term studies. More efforts should be done to reduce the risk of TEAEs caused by upadacitinib 30 mg.

Predictors of nonresponse to dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis: A machine learning analysis

BACKGROUND

Many patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) have a suboptimal response to systemic therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed predictors of nonresponse to dupilumab in patients with AD.

METHODS

Data (April 2017 through June 2019) for patients aged ≥12 years with AD (ICD-9/10-CM: 691.8/L20.x) who initiated dupilumab on or after April 1, 2017 (index date) were collected from an electronic health record and insurance claims database. Nonresponse indicators (dupilumab discontinuation, addition of another systemic therapy or phototherapy, addition of a high-potency topical corticosteroid, AD-related hospital visit, AD-related emergency room visit, incident skin infection) were predicted from available demographic and clinical variables using machine learning.

RESULTS

Among 419 patients (mean age: 45 years), 145 (35%) experienced ≥1 indicator of nonresponse in the 6-month post-index period. In patients with ≥1 indicator, the most common was dupilumab discontinuation (47% [68/145]). Of note, this analysis could not capture nonmedical reasons of dupilumab discontinuation (eg, cost, access). The most common predictors of nonresponse were a claim for ibuprofen (in 69% of patients with a nonresponse indicator) and Quan-Charlson Comorbidity Index value of 3-4 (59%).

CONCLUSION

Systemic dupilumab therapy for AD can be associated with a relatively high prevalence of nonresponse indicators. Factors associated with these indicators -ie, predictors of nonresponse- may be used to optimize disease management.

Prescription Market Share and Treatment Patterns in Atopic Dermatitis: A Retrospective Observational Study Using US Insurance Claims

INTRODUCTION

There is limited real-world evidence on the treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) since dupilumab was approved in 2017. The objective of this study was to assess market share of drugs commonly prescribed for the treatment of AD and describe treatment patterns in patients diagnosed with AD.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational study in adult patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis of AD between 2017 and 2019 using insurance claims data in the US population.

RESULTS

Market share cohorts consisted of 75,794 (2017) and 89,618 (2018) patients. Treatment patterns cohort had 68,588 patients with 63.56% female, mean (SD) age 43.54 (15.96) years, and mean (SD) Quan CCI 0.31 (0.85). Topicals had two-thirds market share by prescription volume (2017 = 65.56%; 2018 = 63.63%). Corticosteroids were the most prescribed topical (2017 = 71.94%; 2018 = 72.04%) and systemic (2017 = 30.59%; 2018 = 30.23%) drug class. Dupilumab had the highest medication adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC] ≥ 80%; 60.74%) and persistence (17.39%), lowest discontinuation rate (23.32%), and longest mean (SD) days on therapy 148.20 (101.77).

CONCLUSION

Topicals are the primary treatment for patients with AD, even though systemic users have higher medication adherence (PDC). Systemics provide a treatment alternative to topicals.

The current treatment landscape in adult atopic dermatitis in the United States: results from a cross-sectional real-world study

BACKGROUND

This study describes the current treatment landscape in adult atopic dermatitis (AD), overall and by disease severity.

METHODS

Adult patients with an AD diagnosis in dermatology-specific electronic medical records during 2018 were identified and linked to an administrative claims database. Disease severity was determined using Physician's Global Assessment (PGA). Written and dispensed prescriptions, within and between class cycling for AD therapies occurring in 2018 were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 4,364 patients were included. Among patients with available PGA, 43.2% had clear-to-mild, 37.3% had moderate, and 19.6% had severe disease. Most patients (71.0%) had written prescriptions for topical therapies only in 2018. Among the patients with claims for topical therapies alone, 80.7% used topical corticosteroids only. Within and between class cycling was observed in 33.7% and 12.8% of topical users, respectively. In patients with systemic therapy (40.6%), nearly 84.9% also used topical therapy, 25.8% cycled within systemic drug classes, and 24.8% cycled between systemic drug classes. Overall, cycling was more prevalent in patients with more severe disease.

CONCLUSION

Cycling within and between both topical and systemic drug classes was more common in patients with more severe disease, indicating difficulty of managing these patients and highlighting a need for more treatment options.

Economic Burden and Healthcare Resource Use of Alopecia Areata in an Insured Population in the USA

INTRODUCTION

Comparative data on the economic burden of alopecia areata relative to the general population are limited. The objective of this retrospective database analysis was to evaluate healthcare resource utilization and direct medical costs among patients with alopecia areata from the US payer perspective compared with matched controls.

METHODS

Validated billing codes were used to identify patients with alopecia areata from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus (2016-2018) who had continuous pharmacy and medical enrollment for 365 days both before (baseline period) and after (evaluation period) the index date. Demographic and clinical characteristics were characterized, and baseline comorbidities were assessed with the Quan Charlson Comorbidity Index.

RESULTS

Using the exact matching feature from Instant Health Data, 14,340 patients with alopecia areata were matched with 42,998 control patients aged ≥ 12 years. Patients with alopecia areata had higher healthcare resource utilization and adjusted total all-cause mean medical costs versus matched controls ($8557 versus $6416; p < 0.0001), because of higher inpatient costs, emergency department visits, ambulatory visits, number of prescriptions and prescription costs, and other costs such as durable medical equipment and home healthcare. The number of inpatient visits did not significantly differ between the two groups. Mean ambulatory costs were $3640 for patients with alopecia areata and $2062 for controls, and mean pharmacy costs were $3287 and $1843, respectively (p < 0.0001 for both). Pharmacy costs related to immunologic agents represented 50.0% of the total difference in pharmacy spending between patients with alopecia areata and controls. Surgery on the integumentary system accounted for 9.5% of the total difference in ambulatory costs.

CONCLUSION

Alopecia areata is associated with significant incremental healthcare resource utilization and costs relative to matched controls due to increased spending in areas such as surgical procedures and psychological and pharmacological interventions. Costs are primarily driven by ambulatory and pharmacy spending.

Potential of Tamanu (Calophyllum inophyllum) Oil for Atopic Dermatitis Treatment

Tamanu oil, derived from the nut of Calophyllum inophyllum L., has been traditionally used to treat various skin-related ailments. In recent years, this oil is increasingly gaining popularity as researchers continue to search for novel natural alternative therapies for various skin diseases. There have been a number of in vitro and in vivo studies investigating various skin-active properties of tamanu oil, and it has been proven to have potent anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antimicrobial, analgesic, and even wound-healing abilities. These properties make tamanu oil an especially interesting candidate for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). This multifaceted disease is marked by the disruption of the skin barrier function, chronic inflammation, and skin microbiome dysbiosis with limited treatment options, which is free from adverse events and inexpensive, making it desperate for a new treatment option. In this review, we examine previous in vitro and in vivo studies on AD-relevant pharmacological properties of tamanu oil in order to evaluate the potential of tamanu oil as a novel treatment option for AD.

Patient and Caregiver Preferences on Treatment Attributes for Atopic Dermatitis

BACKGROUND

The expanding number of potential treatment options for atopic dermatitis (AD) highlights the need to better understand the treatment preferences of individuals with AD.

OBJECTIVE

This study identified attributes that most greatly influenced treatment preferences of adults/adolescents/caregivers of children with mild/moderate/severe AD.

METHODS

Adults (≥18 years), adolescents (12-17 years), and caregivers of children (2-11 years) with mild, moderate, or severe AD in the United States (US) and United Kingdom (UK) participated in semistructured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to identify and generate themes across the interview results describing the treatment attributes of greatest importance to participants.

RESULTS

Qualitative interviews were conducted with 35 adults, 35 caregivers, and 33 adolescent participants across both countries (n = 103; US =51; UK =52) and all severity groups (mild =43; moderate =47; severe =13). The most important treatment attributes included efficacy (96.1%; speed and duration of symptom relief), mode of administration (66.0%; route of administration, frequency, and convenience), and side effects (55.3%, short-term, long-term, and general).

CONCLUSION

Efficacy, mode of administration, and side effects were the most important attributes that influenced AD treatment preferences for patients and caregivers across different countries, ages, and disease severity. These results may assist patients/caregivers/clinicians in shared decision-making discussions to improve treatment adherence and outcomes.

Comparative efficacy and safety of systemic therapies used in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis

Given the lack of head-to-head studies of systemic therapies in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), network meta-analyses (NMAs) can provide comparative efficacy and safety data to inform clinical decision-making. In this NMA, eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before 24 October 2019 were identified by a systematic literature review. Short-term (12-16 weeks) efficacy (Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] and Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI] responses), patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and safety data from each trial were abstracted and analysed separately for monotherapy and combination therapy (systemic plus topical anti-inflammatory therapy). RCTs were analysed in fixed-effects and random-effects Bayesian NMA models. Overall, 19 phase 2 and phase 3 RCTs of abrocitinib, baricitinib, dupilumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab, tralokinumab and upadacitinib were included. In monotherapy RCTs, upadacitinib 30 mg once daily (QD) had the numerically highest efficacy (83.6% achieved ≥50% improvement in EASI [EASI-50 response]), followed by abrocitinib 200 mg QD (74.6%), upadacitinib 15 mg QD (70.5%), dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) (63.4%) and abrocitinib 100 mg QD (56.7%). Similar trends in EASI-75 and EASI-90 response were observed. In combination therapy RCTs, abrocitinib 200 mg QD had the highest EASI-50 (86.6%), followed by dupilumab 300 mg Q2W (82.4%) and abrocitinib 100 mg QD (79.7%). Similar findings were observed for IGA response and PROs. In monotherapy and combination therapy RCTs, the probability of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was higher among all active treatments than with placebo (except for dupilumab 300 mg Q2W [odds ratio (OR), 0.96; 95% credible interval (CrI), 0.45-2.18] and abrocitinib 100 mg QD [OR, 0.95; 95% CrI, 0.35-2.66] in combination therapy RCTs), although active treatments did not significantly differ from one another. Abrocitinib, dupilumab and upadacitinib were consistently the most effective systemic therapies in adult and adolescent patients with AD, with no significant TEAE differences in short-term RCTs.

Psychosocial Comorbidities and Health Status Among Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A 2017 US National Health and Wellness Survey Analysis

Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with sleep difficulties, depression, and anxiety. We evaluated the relationship between these psychosocial comorbidities and health outcomes among adults with moderate-to-severe AD in the USA.

Methods

Data were analyzed from the 2017 US National Health and Wellness Survey. Respondents with a physician diagnosis of AD or eczema with moderate-to-severe AD based on a Dermatology Life Quality Index score of 6 or more were included. Generalized linear models were used to examine the relationship between psychosocial comorbidities (sleep difficulties and anxiety based on self-report, depression based on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and health outcomes [the 36-item Short Form Health Survey, version 2; EuroQol five-dimension, five-level; Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire; and healthcare resource utilization (HRU)].

Results

Among respondents with moderate-to-severe AD (N = 1017), 56.6%, 70.7%, and 60.9% reported sleep difficulties, depression, and anxiety, respectively. These comorbidities were significantly associated with reduced physical and mental component summary scores and increased overall work impairment (P < 0.05 for all). Increased HRU was also observed.

Conclusion

Psychosocial comorbidities were frequently reported by respondents with moderate-to-severe AD and were significantly associated with health status, work loss, and HRU.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01630-z.

Clinical and Economic Burden of Pediatric Mild-to-Moderate Atopic Dermatitis: A Population-Based Nested Case-Control Study in Sweden

Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin condition characterized by pruritic, eczematous lesions. Recent evidence suggests that AD may be a systemic disorder, implying that management of this disease extends beyond merely controlling symptoms associated with AD. Even though this disease is highly prevalent in children and patients typically present with mild-to-moderate symptoms, the disease burden is not well established.

Methods

A large, retrospective cohort study of Swedish population data was conducted to compare the clinical burden in terms of healthcare resource use and direct medical costs for pediatric mild-to-moderate (pM2M) AD patients (≤ 14 years of age, N = 87,721) with matched controls. The burden of a severe AD cohort was also evaluated. Severity of AD was defined by treatment usage and systemic treatment was used as a proxy for severe AD. A robust approach was used by including any type of secondary care visits known to be more common in AD patients than in the general population; however, data for primary care visits were not available.

Results

For healthcare resource use, the incidence rate ratio (pM2M AD versus reference cohort) of secondary care visits ranged from 1.56 to 2.35 during each of 5 years after AD onset (all p < 0.001), with largest differences seen in years 1–2. The average direct medical cost (SD) was €1111 (3416) and €524 (2446) in the pM2M AD and reference cohorts, respectively. The corresponding estimate in the severe AD cohort was €1906 (7067). Including all secondary care visits and pharmacy-dispensed medications, the pM2M AD cohort was shown to have an additional €118.9 million in direct medical costs over 5 years compared with the reference cohort.

Conclusions

This study shows significant clinical and economic burden of pM2M AD with important secondary care resource utilization, suggesting a need for further research to increase treatment options and improve the management of these patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-020-00470-z.