1
|
van Sinderen F, Tensen E, Lansink RA, Jaspers MW, Peute LW. Eleven years of teledermoscopy in the Netherlands: A retrospective quality and performance analysis of 18,738 consultations. J Telemed Telecare 2024; 30:1037-1046. [PMID: 36052405 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x221122113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Teledermoscopy supports and enhances the early detection of skin lesions by general practitioners in primary practice through remote consultation with dermatologists. Teledermoscopy has been a regular health service in Dutch primary care since February 2009. Teledermoscopy quality and performance outcomes on Dutch general practitioner primary care 11 years after its implementation were assessed. METHODS Dutch primary care teledermoscopy consultation data was retrospectively analysed on timestamps and responses on non-mandatory evaluation questions posed to the general practitioner and teledermatologist during the teledermoscopy consultation process. Anonymized data (February 2009-February 2020) was extracted from a Dutch teledermoscopy service database. The timestamps and evaluation questions data were subject to the teledermoscopy quality and performance outcomes. A limited cost evaluation was performed. RESULTS A total of 18,738 teledermoscopy consultations were sent by 1341 general practitioners (February 2009-February 2020). For 3908 (31.9%) teledermoscopy consultations, the general practitioner requested second opinion advice which led to 712 (18.2%) extra teledermoscopy referrals of patients who would not have been referred without teledermoscopy, including skin cancer teledermoscopy diagnoses. The general practitioner followed the teledermatologists' advice on patient referral for 8813 (88.5%) patients, reported 97.3% of the teledermoscopy consultations as helpful and 95.1% as instructive, referred 68.0% less patients with teledermoscopy availability, referred overall 59.4% less patients, and needed 5.4 minutes (median) for sending a teledermoscopy consultation. Teledermatologist's median answer and response time was 2 minutes and 2.4 hours, respectively. The estimated cost reduction was €144.18 ($164.65) (50.2%) per teledermoscopy patient. DISCUSSION Teledermoscopy is a useful service in general practitioner practice for requesting dermatologist advice in primary care settings to support the detection of skin lesion at an early stage and at lower costs. Teledermoscopy could also decrease the burden of secondary dermatology care since general practitioners reported that they did not refer the majority of patients to a dermatologist after the teledermoscopy consultation compared to their initial referral decision. General practitioners reported the teledermoscopy system as helpful and instructive which could contribute to enhancement of their dermatological knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Femke van Sinderen
- Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Ksyos Health Management Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esmée Tensen
- Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Ksyos Health Management Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rick Ab Lansink
- Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique Wm Jaspers
- Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Linda Wp Peute
- Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Digital Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peracca SB, Lachica O, Lamkin RP, Jackson GL, Mohr DC, King HA, Whited JD, Fonseca AS, Morris IJ, Gifford AL, Weinstock MA, Oh DH. Implementation of Direct-to-Patient Mobile Teledermatology in VA. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:97-105. [PMID: 38252250 PMCID: PMC10937882 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08480-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Innovative technology can enhance patient access to healthcare but must be successfully implemented to be effective. OBJECTIVE We evaluated Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA's) implementation of My VA Images, a direct-to-patient asynchronous teledermatology mobile application enabling established dermatology patients to receive follow-up care remotely instead of in-person. DESIGN /PARTICIPANTS/APPROACH Following pilot testing at 3 facilities, the app was introduced to 28 facilities (4 groups of 7) every 3 months using a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized design. Using the Organizational Theory of Implementation Effectiveness, we examined the app's implementation using qualitative and quantitative data consisting of encounter data from VA's corporate data warehouse; app usage from VA's Mobile Health database; bi-monthly reports from facility representatives; phone interviews with clinicians; and documented communications between the operational partner and facility staff. KEY RESULTS Implementation policies and practices included VA's vision to expand home telehealth and marketing/communication strategies. The COVID-19 pandemic dominated the implementation climate by stressing staffing, introducing competing demands, and influencing stakeholder attitudes to the app, including its fit to their values. These factors were associated with mixed implementation effectiveness, defined as high quality consistent use. Nineteen of 31 exposed facilities prepared to use the app; 10 facilities used it for actual patient care, 7 as originally intended. Residents, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants were more likely than attendings to use the app. Facilities exposed to the app pre-pandemic were more likely to use and sustain the new process. CONCLUSIONS Considerable heterogeneity existed in implementing mobile teledermatology, despite VA's common mission, integrated healthcare system, and stakeholders' broad interest. Identifying opportunities to target favorable facilities and user groups (such as teaching facilities and physician extenders, respectively) while addressing internal implementation barriers including incomplete integration with the electronic health record as well as inadequate staffing may help optimize the initial impact of direct-to-patient telehealth. The COVID pandemic was a notable extrinsic barrier. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NCT03241589.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara B Peracca
- Dermatology Service (190), San Francisco VA Health Care System, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA
| | - Olevie Lachica
- Dermatology Service (190), San Francisco VA Health Care System, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA
| | - Rebecca P Lamkin
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02130, USA
| | - George L Jackson
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - David C Mohr
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02130, USA
- Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Heather A King
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 6301 Herndon Road, Durham, NC, 27713, USA
| | - John D Whited
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 6301 Herndon Road, Durham, NC, 27713, USA
| | - Allene S Fonseca
- Department of Dermatology, Wayne State University, 18101 Oakwood Boulevard #402, Dearborn, MI, 48124, USA
| | - Isis J Morris
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Allen L Gifford
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02130, USA
- Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, 72 E Concord Street, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Martin A Weinstock
- Department of Dermatology and Epidemiology, Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
- Center for Dermatoepidemiology, Providence VA Medical Center, 830 Chalkstone Avenue, Providence, RI, 02908, USA
| | - Dennis H Oh
- Dermatology Service (190), San Francisco VA Health Care System, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA.
- Department of Dermatology, University of California San Francisco, 1701 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kheterpal MK, Borre ED, Cheema U, Nicholas MW, Cooner EW, Phinney D, Gagnon K, Zullig LL, King HA, Malcolm EJ, Chen SC. Implementation evaluation of a teledermatology virtual clinic at an academic medical center. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:130. [PMID: 37891695 PMCID: PMC10612341 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00508-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Teledermatology (TD) is an evidence-based practice that may increase access to dermatologic care. We sought to use the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) and the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) frameworks to evaluate implementation of TD at Duke. METHODS The EPIS and RE-AIM frameworks were deployed to design and implement a TD program that leveraged the strengths of the Duke University Health System and addressed previously reported barriers to implementation of store-and-forward and synchronous TD models. In the resultant hybrid TD model, trained primary care providers (PCPs) sent e-comm referrals with clinical and dermatoscopic images to dermatology. These e-consults were reviewed asynchronously and patients were scheduled for a synchronous video visit with dermatology within days. Dermatologists managed the patient plan. This hybrid TD model was piloted at four primary care clinics. Pertinent outcomes from a TD-adapted RE-AIM framework were tracked using electronic health record data. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a post-video visit survey (n = 18). Implementation barriers and facilitators were also collected through provider surveys (n = 24 PCPs, n = 10 dermatologists, n = 10 dermatology residents). RESULTS At four PCP clinics throughout 9/1/2021-4/30/2022, there were 218 TD referrals. Video visits occurred on average 7.5 ± 0.5 days after referral and 18/18 patients completing the post-visit survey were satisfied. Adoption varied between clinics, with one placing 22% of all dermatology referrals as TD and another placing 2%. The primary PCP barriers to TD were time burdens, lack of fit in clinic flow, and discomfort with image taking. Top-endorsed potential facilitating interventions included allowing for rash referrals without dermoscopy and assurance for clinical evaluation within 3 days. CONCLUSIONS The use of implementation science frameworks allowed for identification of system and contextual strengths which informed the hybrid TD pilot. Barriers and facilitating interventions will provide guidance for expansion and ongoing maintenance of TD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meenal K Kheterpal
- Department of Dermatology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3135, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| | - Ethan D Borre
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Matilda W Nicholas
- Department of Dermatology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3135, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Edward W Cooner
- Duke Primary Care, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Donna Phinney
- Duke Telehealth Office, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kelly Gagnon
- Performance Services, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Leah L Zullig
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Heather A King
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth J Malcolm
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Suephy C Chen
- Department of Dermatology, Duke University Medical Center, DUMC Box 3135, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lamkin RP, Peracca SB, Jackson GL, Hines AC, Gifford AL, Lachica O, Li D, Morris IJ, Paiva M, Weinstock MA, Oh DH. Using the RE-AIM framework to assess national teledermatology expansion. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2023; 3:1217829. [PMID: 37936881 PMCID: PMC10627029 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1217829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
Background Teledermatology has been utilized in the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for decades but continues to have incomplete penetration. VA has funded an initiative to enhance access to dermatology services since 2017 to support asynchronous teledermatology for Veterans living in rural areas. As part of an ongoing evaluation of this program, we assessed the teledermatology activity between the fiscal years 2020 and 2022. We focused on the second cohort of the initiative, comprising six VA facilities and their 54 referral clinics. Methods We studied teledermatology programs at cohort facilities using the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework. We used a mixed-methods design including annual online reports completed by participating facilities and VA administrative data. When possible, we compared the data from the 3 years of teledermatology funding with the baseline year prior to the start of funding. Findings Reach: Compared with the baseline year, there was a 100% increase in encounters and a 62% increase in patients seen at the funded facilities. Over 500 clinicians and support staff members were trained. Effectiveness: In FY 2022, primary or specialty care clinics affiliated with the funded facilities had more dermatology programs than primary or specialty care clinics across the VA (83% vs. 71% of sites). Adoption: By the end of the funding period, teledermatology constituted 16% of dermatology encounters at the funded facilities compared with 12% nationally. This reflected an increase from 9.2% at the funded facilities and 10.3% nationally prior to the funding period. Implementation: The continued funding for staff and equipment facilitated the expansion to rural areas. Maintenance: By the end of the funding period, all facilities indicated that they had fully implemented their program for patients of targeted primary care providers. The Program Sustainability Index scores generally increased during the funding period. Conclusions Targeted funding to support asynchronous teledermatology implementation for rural Veterans increased its reach, adoption, and implementation, ultimately improving access. Providing program guidance with staffing and training resources can increase the impact of these programs. Ongoing efforts to maintain and increase communication between primary care and dermatology will be needed to sustain success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca P. Lamkin
- Center for Healthcare Organizational and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Sara B. Peracca
- Dermatology Service, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - George L. Jackson
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery & Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Durham, NC, United States
- Peter O'Donnell, Jr. School of Public Health, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Aliya C. Hines
- Department of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Detroit, MI, United States
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Allen L. Gifford
- Center for Healthcare Organizational and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Medicine, Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Health, Law, Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Olevie Lachica
- Dermatology Service, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Donglin Li
- Center for Healthcare Organizational and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Isis J. Morris
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery & Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Veterans Health Administration, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Marcelo Paiva
- Center for Dermatology, Providence VA Medical Center, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Martin A. Weinstock
- Center for Dermatology, Providence VA Medical Center, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, RI, United States
- Department of Dermatology and Epidemiology, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
- Office of Connected Care, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Dennis H. Oh
- Dermatology Service, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, United States
- Office of Connected Care, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, United States
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kheterpal M, Borre ED, Nicholas MW, Cooner EW, Phinney D, Gagnon K, Zullig LL, King HA, Malcolm EJ, Chen SC. Implementation Evaluation of a Teledermatology Virtual Clinic at an Academic Medical Center. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-2558425. [PMID: 36909611 PMCID: PMC10002841 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2558425/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
Background Teledermatology (TD) is an evidence-based practice that may increase access to dermatologic care. We sought to evaluate implementation of TD at four Duke primary care practices. Methods We implemented a hybrid TD program where trained primary care providers (PCPs) sent referrals with clinical and dermatoscopic images to dermatology. Patients were seen by dermatologists over video visit within days, and dermatologists managed the patient plan. We evaluated implementation using the Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework using electronic health record data. Implementation barriers and facilitators were collected through surveys (n = 24 PCPs, n = 10 dermatologists, n = 10 dermatology residents). Results At four PCP clinics throughout 9/1/2021-4/30/2022 there were 218 TD referrals. Video visits occurred on average 7.5 days after referral and 18/18 patients completing the post-visit survey were satisfied. Adoption varied between clinics, with one placing 22% of all dermatology referrals as TD and another placing 2%. The primary PCP barriers to TD were time burdens, lack of fit in clinic flow, and discomfort with image taking. Top-endorsed potential facilitating interventions included allowing for rash referrals without dermoscopy and assurance for clinical evaluation within 3 days. Conclusions Addressing TD process fit into PCP clinic flow and reducing time burdens may increase PCP uptake of TD.
Collapse
|
6
|
Optimizing virtual visits and reducing inbox messages using a pre-visit questionnaire: A quality improvement project. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023:S0190-9622(23)00142-1. [PMID: 36720367 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.12.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
7
|
Peracca SB, Fonseca AS, Lachica O, Jackson GL, Morris IJ, King HA, Misitzis A, Whited JD, Mohr DC, Lamkin RP, Gifford AL, Weinstock MA, Oh DH. Organizational Readiness for Patient-Facing Mobile Teledermatology to Care for Established Veteran Patients in the United States. Telemed J E Health 2023; 29:72-80. [PMID: 35612465 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2022.0009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To improve patient access to skin care, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) developed a patient-facing asynchronous mobile teledermatology application (app), which allows patients to follow up remotely with dermatologists. To understand how the app would be received in VA, we examined Organizational Readiness for Change (ORC), an important prelude to effective implementation, which includes the shared resolve and collective ability of organizational members to implement a change. Methods: We used a mixed-methods multiple case study approach to assess ORC at three VA facilities. Data derived from a site process call, surveys, and semistructured telephone interviews of VA staff, field notes, and administrative data. Results: Participants at all three facilities supported the intervention and recognized the value of using the app to increase patients' access to dermatologists, but expressed concerns largely related to disruption of the pre-existing clinical workflow. Participants at the facility most actively using the app had the highest overall ORC score and reported the most facilitators. Facility leadership support when guided by a clinical champion minimized barriers by recognizing the complexities of health care provision at specialty clinics. Discussion: While provider buy-in remained a barrier, leadership, guided by the clinical champion, played a critical role instituting implementation strategies. The strong association between the ORC survey score and the presence of facilitators and barriers suggests that the ORC survey may be a rapid, convenient, and effective tool for health care systems to identify favorable sites for wider implementation of mobile telehealth care. Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT03241589.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara B Peracca
- Dermatology Service, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Allene S Fonseca
- Center for Dermatoepidemiology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Department of Dermatology and Epidemiology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Olevie Lachica
- Dermatology Service, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - George L Jackson
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Population Health Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Isis J Morris
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Heather A King
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Population Health Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Angelica Misitzis
- Center for Dermatoepidemiology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Department of Dermatology and Epidemiology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - John D Whited
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - David C Mohr
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rebecca P Lamkin
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Allen L Gifford
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Martin A Weinstock
- Center for Dermatoepidemiology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Department of Dermatology and Epidemiology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Dennis H Oh
- Dermatology Service, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA.,Department of Dermatology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Puri P, Yiannias JA, Mangold AR, Swanson DL, Pittelkow MR. The policy dimensions, regulatory landscape, and market characteristics of teledermatology in the United States. JAAD Int 2021; 1:202-207. [PMID: 34409341 PMCID: PMC8362249 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdin.2020.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has spurred healthcare systems across the world to rapidly redesign their models of care delivery. As such, this pandemic has accelerated the adoption of teledermatology in the United States. However, it remains unknown whether this momentum will be maintained after the pandemic. The future of teledermatology in the United States will be significantly influenced by a complex set of policy, legal, and regulatory frameworks. An understanding of these frameworks will help dermatologists more effectively adopt and implement teledermatology platforms. In this article, we review the current state of teledermatology in the United States, including policy dimensions, the regulatory landscape, market characteristics, and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pranav Puri
- Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ghani M, Adler C, Yeung H. Patient Factors Associated with Interest in Teledermatology: Cross-sectional Survey. JMIR DERMATOLOGY 2021; 4:e21555. [PMID: 37625162 PMCID: PMC10501513 DOI: 10.2196/21555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 08/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Teledermatology is a conduit for patients communicating with dermatologists on the internet, which bypasses in-person visits. It holds promise to address access needs for dermatologic care; however, the interest in using teledermatology is unknown in underserved populations with potential barriers to the use of health care technology. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to characterize the association between demographic characteristics with interest in exchanging digital images or videos of skin lesions with health care providers electronically. METHODS We examined data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 4 cycle 4 (2014) of the National Cancer Institute. HINTS is a cross-sectional, nationally representative household survey conducted annually, which collects information on demographics, perceptions and use of health information, and provides information on how cancer risks are perceived. HINTS 4 cycle 4 had a sample of 3677 participants. We examined the outcome to the question, "how interested are you in exchanging digital images or videos (eg, photos of skin lesions) with a health care provider electronically?" We dichotomized the outcome by a high level of interest (responding with "very") and those who did not have a high level of interest (responding with "somewhat," "a little," or "not at all") in exchanging images or videos. We used a multivariable logistic regression model developed through backwards selection, with all final covariates associated with varying levels of teledermatology use at P<.05. Sensitivity analysis was performed by changing the outcome dichotomy to model those who were "not at all" interested. Two-sided tests were performed with P<.05 considered significant. RESULTS Among 3447 respondents, 888 (weighted prevalence=26.2%) were "very" interested in participating in teledermatology. A higher interest in using teledermatology was associated with a younger age, higher educational attainment, higher household income, internet usage, type of mobile device ownership, history of electronic medical information exchange with a clinician within the past 12 months, and high level of trust in web-based information on cancer (for all, P<.01), but not with the female gender, race or ethnicity, health insurance status, or having a regular medical provider. CONCLUSIONS Modifiable access barriers to teledermatology adoption include trust, experience with teledermatology, and use of health apps. Teledermatology program implementation should address these specific factors within the digital divide to promote equitable access to care across diverse patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maham Ghani
- City University of New York School of Medicine, City University of New York, New york, NY, United States
| | - Colin Adler
- Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Howa Yeung
- Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
- Regional Telehealth Service, Veterans Affairs Veterans Integrated Service Network 7, Decatur, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Peracca SB, Fonseca A, Hines A, King HA, Grenga AM, Jackson GL, Whited JD, Chapman JG, Lamkin R, Mohr DC, Gifford A, Weinstock MA, Oh DH. Implementation of Mobile Teledermatology: Challenges and Opportunities. Telemed J E Health 2021; 27:1416-1422. [PMID: 33691074 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: While teledermatology is well-established in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), its implementation is far from complete. To facilitate consultative teledermatology and extend its reach, VA introduced a mobile teledermatology application (app) at three VA sites. Methods: We evaluated the initial implementation process using a mixed-methods, multiple case study approach to assess organizational readiness for change (ORC), which included examining facilitators, barriers, and contextual factors that affected implementation. We conducted: (1) group interviews and bimonthly reports to understand site processes; (2) semistructured interviews and surveys of individual participants representing a range of implementation roles; and (3) a review of internal organizational documents. We identified themes from interviews using an iterative process, and computed an ORC score based on surveys. Results: Forty-three individuals participated in the study. Qualitative data from all sites, corroborated by survey data available from one site, revealed a high readiness for change with an ORC score of 4.2, where 5 = maximal readiness for change. Facilitators included support from leadership and clinical champions, active telehealth programs, and an understanding and appreciation of the program and the resources needed. At all sites, however, technical issues negatively affected adoption; these included a suboptimal information technology infrastructure, which led to the inoperability of the app at two sites, and technical inefficiencies related to users' unfamiliarity with new devices and inconsistent internet access. Conclusions: Although a strong commitment to change and a confidence to effect change existed, these alone were insufficient to surmount barriers to implementation effectiveness. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03241589.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara B Peracca
- Dermatology Service, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Allene Fonseca
- Center for Dermatoepidemiology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Department of Dermatology and Epidemiology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Aliya Hines
- VA Ann Arbor Health Care System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Heather A King
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Population Health Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Andrea M Grenga
- Center for Dermatoepidemiology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - George L Jackson
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Population Health Science, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - John D Whited
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jennifer G Chapman
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rebecca Lamkin
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David C Mohr
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Allen Gifford
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Martin A Weinstock
- Center for Dermatoepidemiology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Department of Dermatology and Epidemiology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Dennis H Oh
- Dermatology Service, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA.,Department of Dermatology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Turan Ç, Utlu Z. Investigating the factors enabling the accurate implementation of the patient-assisted teledermatology model during the pandemic in Turkey: A pilot study. Dermatol Ther 2021; 34:e14741. [PMID: 33404147 DOI: 10.1111/dth.14741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
We aim to investigate the factors enabling the accurate implementation of the patient-assisted teledermatology model during the pandemic in our country. This single-center, a prospective-survey study was enrolled consecutively 468 patients aged 13 years and older. The patients were asked about their attitudes towards teledermatology. After the dermatological examinations, the diagnosis and management of the diseases, and classification of diseases according to lesion locations were recorded. The physician's and the patient's opinions on whether it was possible to manage properly the current medical condition through teledermatology were recorded. The patients stated that 81.2% have been keen to use teledermatology for any complaints during the pandemic. 53.7% of the patients who are positive to use teledermatology expressed that they would never use this method unless it is fully reimbursed. Although it was thought that 49.8% of the current complaints according to the patients and 56.6% to the dermatologists could be resolved appropriately by teledermatology, for 24.8% either the patient's or the physician's opinion was contrary. Being woman, high-income level, and the presence of facial dermatosis favorably affected the patients' and physicians' evaluations regarding the suitability of the complaint to teledermatology. Factors such as low education level, insufficient technical skills to be examined alone, and the necessity of undressing for examination caused patients to consider teledermatology unsuitable for their current complaints. Priority should be given to the development of an appropriate reimbursement system and reducing potential medicolegal risks to encourage patients to participate in high-quality teledermatology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Çağrı Turan
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, the Republic of Turkey, Health Sciences University Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey
| | - Zeynep Utlu
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, the Republic of Turkey, Health Sciences University Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Erzurum, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Peracca SB, Jackson GL, Lamkin RP, Mohr DC, Zhao M, Lachica O, Prentice JC, Grenga AM, Gifford A, Chapman JG, Weinstock MA, Oh DH. Implementing Teledermatology for Rural Veterans: An Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Framework. Telemed J E Health 2020; 27:218-226. [PMID: 32343924 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Few systematic evaluations of implementing teledermatology programs in large health care systems exist. We conducted a longitudinal evaluation of a U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) initiative to expand asynchronous consultative teledermatology services for rural veterans. Methods: The reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework guided the evaluation, which included analysis of quantitative VA administrative data as well as an online survey completed by participating facilities. The first 2 years of the program were compared with the year before the start of funding. Results: Sixteen hub facilities expanded teledermatology's reach over the 2-year period, increasing the number of referral spoke sites, unique patients served, and teledermatology encounters. Effectiveness was reflected as teledermatology constituted an increasing fraction of dermatology activity and served more remotely located patients. Adoption through defined stages of implementation progressed as facilities engaged in a variety of strategies to enhance teledermatology implementation, and facilitators and barriers were identified. Program maintenance was assessed by Program Sustainability Index scores, which reflected the importance of executive support, and ongoing concerns about staffing and longitudinal funding. Discussion: Enabling hubs to create solutions that best fit their needs and culture likely increased reach and effectiveness. Important facilitators included organizational leadership and encouraging communication between stakeholders before and during the intervention. Conclusions: A systematic analysis of teledermatology implementation to serve rural sites in VA documented a high degree of implementation and sustainability as well as areas for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara B Peracca
- Dermatology Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - George L Jackson
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences and Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rebecca P Lamkin
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David C Mohr
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Molly Zhao
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Olevie Lachica
- Dermatology Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Julia C Prentice
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Boston University, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Allen Gifford
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Veterans Affairs Boston Health Care System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer G Chapman
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Martin A Weinstock
- Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island.,Office of Connected Care, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.,Dermatoepidemiology Unit, Departments of Dermatology and Epidemiology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Dennis H Oh
- Dermatology Service, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, California, USA.,Office of Connected Care, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.,Department of Dermatology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|