Improving Treatment Adherence in Your Patients with Schizophrenia: The STAY Initiative

Treatment adherence rates across different psychiatric disorders and settings: findings from a large patient cohort

Approximately 50% of patients with psychiatric disorders do not fully adhere to the prescribed psychopharmacological therapy, significantly impacting the progression of the disorder and the patient's quality of life. The present study aimed to assess potential differences in terms of rates and clinical features of treatment adherence in a large cohort of psychiatric patients with different diagnoses attending various psychiatric services. The study included 307 psychiatric patients diagnosed with a primary major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, schizophrenic spectrum disorder, or personality disorder. Patient's adherence to treatment was evaluated using the Clinician Rating Scale, with a cutoff of at least five defining adherence subgroups. One-third of the sample reported poor medication adherence. A lower rate of adherence emerged among patients with schizophrenic spectrum disorder and bipolar disorder. Subjects with poor adherence were more frequently inpatients and showed higher current substance use, a greater number of previous hospitalizations, and more severe scores at psychopathological assessment compared with patients with positive adherence. Poor adherence was associated with symptom severity and increased rates of relapses and rehospitalizations. In addition, substance use appears to be an unfavorable transdiagnostic factor for treatment adherence.

Schizophrenia and medication adherence: Associated factors

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia is a chronic condition that requiring maintenance treatment with antipsychotic medication. Medication adherence is essential to improve the symptoms of this health problem reduce relapses and readmissions and achieve treatment goals. The rate of challenges associated with medication adherence in schizophrenia is reported to be 26.5-85.1 %.

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to determine factors associated with medication adherence in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia.

METHODS

A descriptive correlational research design was used. The study was completed with a total of 162 participants diagnosed with schizophrenia, between February-June 2021, at a Community Mental Health Center. Regression analysis (Model: enter and stepwise) was used to determine associated factors.

RESULTS

The mean medication adherence score of individual diagnosed with schizophrenia indicated that more than half of the participants (52 %) had poor medication adherence. In individual diagnosed with schizophrenia, medication attitudes, level of internalized stigma, the status of regular attendance to appointments, belief in recovery, and using medicines as prescribed were complicating factors for medication adherence (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Medication adherence in individuals with diagnosed schizophrenia may be multifactorial. Mental health professionals should consider associated factors and implement a personalized treatment plan in this direction for strengthening adherence to medication treatment.

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on hallucinations and delusions in youth at clinical high-risk for psychosis and outpatients with schizophrenia

Although the COVID-19 pandemic has had detrimental effects on mental health in the general population, the impact on those with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders has received relatively little attention. Assessing pandemic-related changes in positive symptoms is particularly critical to inform treatment protocols and determine whether fluctuations in hallucinations and delusions are related to telehealth utilization and treatment adherence. In the current longitudinal study, we evaluated changes in the frequency of hallucinations and delusions and distress resulting from them across three-time points. Participants included: (1) outpatients with chronic schizophrenia (SZ: n = 32) and healthy controls (CN: n = 31); (2) individuals at clinically high risk for psychosis (CHR: n = 25) and CN (n = 30). A series of questionnaires were administered to assess hallucination and delusion severity, medication adherence, telehealth utilization, and protective factors during the pandemic. While there were no significant increases in the frequency of hallucinations and delusions in SZ and CHR, distress increased from pre-pandemic to early pandemic in both groups and then decreased at the third time point. Additionally, changes in positive symptom severity in SZ were related to psychiatric medication adherence. Findings suggest that positive symptoms are a critical treatment target during the pandemic and that ongoing medication services will be beneficial.

Assessing evidence for seasonality of hospital admissions for schizophrenia in Queensland, Australia: a time series observational study

Most evidence on seasonal admission patterns for schizophrenia derives from the Northern Hemisphere with results from the Southern Hemisphere less documented. This study examines seasonal patterns in hospital admissions due to schizophrenia in Queensland, Australia, a large area that has a range of different climatic features. Daily hospital admissions data for people with the primary diagnosis of schizophrenia were collected from Queensland Health Department for the period from January 1996 to December 2015. A generalised linear regression model with Quasi-Poisson distribution was used to assess seasonal admission patterns across different climatic regions. The evidence for seasonality was also explored in subgroups that had different socio-demographic characteristics or history of prior hospitalisation for psychiatric disorders. Overall, a significant winter pattern (RR 1.05, 95%CI 1.01-1.13) was found with a peak in August (RR 1.08, 95%CI 1.03-1.17) in temperate Southeast Queensland. However, the hot humid North and Far North Queensland showed a peak in October (RR 1.10, 95%CI 1.02-1.22). Males (RR 1.11, 95%CI 1.07-1.14), people aged 40-59 years old (RR 1.10, 95%CI 1.05-1.15) and those who had never married (RR 1.09, 95%CI 1.06-1.12), were Australian by birth (RR 1.07, 95%CI 1.04-1.10) or were unemployed (RR 1.13, 95%CI 1.09-1.18) had significantly higher risk for hospital admissions, particularly during the winter months. The seasonal admission pattern for schizophrenia did not change significantly according to admission status and history of outpatient or community psychiatric treatment. The study found some evidence for seasonality of hospital admissions for schizophrenia that differed from northern tropical to southern temperate regions of Queensland.

New approaches to antipsychotic medication adherence - safety, tolerability and acceptability

INTRODUCTION

Antipsychotic pharmacotherapy is considered a first-line treatment in schizophrenia-related disorders and is associated with favorable prognosis and lower mortality rates. However, low adherence rates present a major clinical challenge. In this paper, we will review contemporary approaches to improve adherence to antipsychotic treatment, considering their mechanism of action, safety, tolerability and acceptability.

AREAS COVERED

Novel pharmacological delivery methods included different routes of administration of registered medications (such as intramuscular clozapine preparation and transdermal asenapine), modifications of existing compounds (such as 3-monthly injectable formulation of paliperidone palmitate), and increased interest in oral long-acting medication formulations (such as with penfluridol). In addition, we reviewed innovative technology to monitor adherence, based on the use of electronic digital medicine systems and ingestible sensors.

EXPERT OPINION

All of these diverse approaches were clinically relevant in enhancing treatment adherence and found to be safe and tolerable. The place of each approach is predicated on a personalized approach in each patient, and future research could usefully use large comparative studies to establish robust treatment guidelines. The implementation of new and varied approaches to antipsychotic treatment adherence is welcomed and have the potential to make a significant impact on morbidity in this often difficult-to-treat population.

Psychotropic Medication Adherence in Children and Adolescents

Researchers believe that almost 20% of children and adolescents struggle with chronic and persistent mental health concerns. Mental health is the leading cause of disability in the United States. Youth can struggle with several impairing mental health disorders, such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, mood disorders, psychotic disorders, and autism spectrum disorder. Inadequately treated chronic mental illnesses can adversely affect the growing brain profoundly, including academic decline, early school dropout, cognitive deficits, interpersonal relationship concerns, aggression, suicide attempts or completion, substance use disorders, frequent hospital admissions, and inability to maintain employment. Even if diagnosed early in their course of illness, many of these individuals struggle to continue medications as prescribed. The factors predicting adherence to medications are underresearched in children and adolescents. Psychotropic medication compliance is a complicated issue that is tied to various aspects of caring for a minor individual. Hence, it is relevant to discuss factors that are predicted to contribute to noncompliance in this age group. The purpose of this review is to carefully consider the gaps in knowledge, suggesting interventions by using established instruments and clinical strategies to resolve the identified barriers for improving medication adherence. Compliance should be targeted at various levels, including the entire family tree and the treatment team.

Real-World Outcomes and Costs Following 6 Months of Treatment with the Long-Acting Injectable (LAI) Aripiprazole Lauroxil for the Treatment of Schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Continuous antipsychotic therapy is recommended as part of long-term maintenance treatment of schizophrenia, and gaps in antipsychotic treatment have been associated with increased risks of relapse and rehospitalization. Because the use of long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics may reduce the likelihood of undetected medication gaps, initiating an LAI medication may affect resource utilization and costs. The LAI aripiprazole lauroxil (AL) was approved in the United States (US) in 2015 for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this retrospective observational cohort study was to examine treatment patterns, resource utilization, and costs following initiation of AL for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of Medicaid claims data identified a cohort of patients (N = 485) starting AL shortly after Food and Drug Administration approval in October 2015. Treatment patterns, resource utilization, and costs were compared 6 months before and after treatment initiation. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the type of antipsychotic (LAI, oral, or none) received before initiation of AL.

RESULTS

Over 6 months of follow-up, patients received an average of 4.6 injections out of a maximum of six (77%). After initiating AL, all-cause inpatient admissions decreased by 22.4%; other significant reductions were observed in mental health-related admissions and emergency room (ER) visits. All-cause inpatient costs decreased by an average of US$2836 per patient (p < 0.05) in the 6-month post-AL period, whereas outpatient pharmacy costs increased by US$4121 (p < 0.05), resulting in no significant difference in overall costs between the pre- and post-AL periods. The subgroup of patients who had been prescribed an oral antipsychotic before starting AL had significant reductions in proportion of patients with inpatient and ER visits and costs, but also reported a significant increase in pharmacy costs.

CONCLUSIONS

AL was associated with a significant reduction in inpatient costs and an increase in outpatient pharmacy costs, resulting in no changes in total healthcare costs over 6 months. The adherence rate and reductions in inpatient use may indicate the potential for greater clinical stability among patients initiated on AL compared with their previous treatment.

Testing the hypothesis of subtypes of nonadherence in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

Nonadherence is a major problem in the treatment of psychotic disorders. It has been hypothesized that nonadherent patients with schizophrenia are not a homogeneous population and subtypes of nonadherence might exist, but this hypothesis has not been specifically tested.

AIM

To test the hypothesis of subtypes of nonadherence in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.

METHODS

This prospective study included 110 consecutively admitted patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Assessments were performed at baseline and at 6 mo follow-up after discharge. Sociodemographic, clinical, psychopathological and treatment-related variables were evaluated. Adherence was defined as the concurrence of adherence to antipsychotic treatment and outpatient follow-up during the six-month period. Adherence to antipsychotic treatment was defined as the concurrence of objective and subjective adherence. Sixty-four patients (58%) fulfilled nonadherence criteria at the end of the follow-up period and were categorized according to their subtype of nonadherence.

RESULTS

In nonadherent patients (n = 64), 32 (50%) fulfilled criteria of intentional nonadherence, and 32 (50%) of unintentional nonadherence (UNA). Unintentional nonadherent patients, as compared to intentional nonadherent patients, are characterized by older age, lower educational level, worse cognitive and negative symptoms, greater severity, worse knowledge of their treatment regimen, greater prevalence of supervision of the treatment, lower number of prior hospitalizations and greater use of nonpsychiatric treatment, anticholinergics and hypnotics. Low educational level (OR = 26.1; 95%CI: 2.819-241), worse treatment knowledge at six months (OR per unit = 0.904; 95%CI: 0.853-0.957) and nonpsychiatric treatment at six months (OR = 15.8; 95%CI: 1.790-139) were independently associated to UNA.

CONCLUSION

Differentiated subtypes of nonadherence according to intentionality seem to exist in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. Our findings suggest the need for differentiated approach, both in future research and in clinical practice.

Improving documentation of side-effects discussions by doctors for newly initiated psychotropic medications in outpatient clinics: A single-centre quality-improvement project

Background:

Robust clinical documentation of side-effects communication is an integral component of good patient care, endorsed by the Singapore Medical Council Ethical Code and Ethical Guidelines and further highlighted by the Modified Montgomery Test. In addition to ensuring quality of care, good clinical documentation can help mitigate potential medico-legal risks against doctors and health-care providers.

Objectives:

This audit-cum-quality-improvement project aimed to enhance clinical documentation of side-effects discussion of newly prescribed medication in psychiatry outpatient clinics to 100% in a 12-month period.

Methods:

A baseline measurement revealed that 40% of new cases seen in general and geriatric psychiatry outpatient clinics from March to June 2017 had evidenced clinical documentation of at least one or more side effects. PDSA methodology was employed to bring about improvements and test change interventions.

Results:

Through three audit cycles between January and December 2018 and a fourth round of data collection in April 2019, documentation rates showed marked improvement from a baseline of 40% to 91%. The IT document tool was the most effective intervention which was successfully adopted and implemented into the standard documentation template for new case assessments.

Conclusions:

The project was a success overall, with improvements in documentation rates rising to 91%. Through change interventions, systemic factors rooted in patient safety have been embodied in everyday clinical practice.

Comparison of Paliperidone Palmitate and Second-Generation Oral Antipsychotics in Terms of Medication Adherence, Side Effects, and Quality of Life

PURPOSE

Although schizophrenia can be treated effectively, acute aggravations and relapses occur often. Antipsychotic drug therapies are fairly effective for decreasing the rate of relapses in patients with schizophrenia. This study aimed to compare paliperidone palmitate and the second-generation oral antipsychotic drugs used to treat patients with schizophrenia in terms of medication adherence, side effects, and quality of life.

METHODS

The study included 33 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who were treated with paliperidone palmitate and 51 patients who were treated with second-generation oral antipsychotics. All the patients were administered the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, the Clinical Global Impression, the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale, the UKU (Ugvalg for Kliniske Undersgelser) Side Effect Rating Scale, the Short Form 36, the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, and the Schedule for Assessing the Three Components of Insight.

RESULTS

The medication adherence and perceived general health scores of the patients treated with paliperidone palmitate were significantly higher than those of the patients treated with second-generation antipsychotics, and the side effects of the medication on the patients' daily performance were significantly lower.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that long-acting paliperidone palmitate therapy was associated with more favorable results in terms of medication adherence, drug side effects, and quality of life compared with second-generation oral antipsychotics. However, there is a need for further, more specific, and larger-scale studies in this field.

The impact of self-stigmatization on medication attitude in schizophrenia patients

Negative attitudes towards medication in schizophrenia patients are one major factor contributing to non-adherence behavior. Besides, self-stigmatization represents another frequent and important obstacle in patients suffering from psychotic disorders. Here, we investigated possible associations between medication adherence attitude and the extent of self-stigmatization, while also exploring factors related to self-stigmatization. Sociodemographic characteristics, clinical variables, medication attitude and self-stigmatization were assessed among 81 subjects with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The cross-sectional data was then analyzed by multivariate analyses. A more positive attitude towards medication was predicted by better insight into illness, lower degree of self-stigmatization and good subjective knowledge about medication (adjusted R² = 0.23). Furthermore, a higher level of self-stigmatization was associated with lower subjective wellbeing, more severe depressive symptoms and male gender (adjusted R² = 0.58). Other clinical variables had no additional predictive value for medication adherence attitude or the extent of self-stigmatization. Our findings support the notion that self-stigmatization is an influential factor on medication attitude that should therefore be appreciated in clinical practice. Besides this, special emphasis should be taken on depressive symptoms and reduced wellbeing, especially in male patients, to lower the extent of self-stigmatization.

Universal antiretroviral regimens: thinking beyond one-pill-once-a-day

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Poor adherence to oral antiretroviral treatment in a subpopulation of persons with HIV-1 infection interferes with the potential success of the drug regimens in treating the infection. Here, we review long-acting antiretroviral strategies currently in clinical development that could prove useful for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in individuals not succeeding with short-acting oral regimens.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pharmaceutical nanotechnology has succeeded in creating two novel long-acting injectable antiretroviral compounds, carbotegravir and rilpivirine, which have completed early clinical trials demonstrating the safety, tolerability and prolonged antiretroviral activity. 4'-Ethynyl-2-fluoro-2'-deoxyadenosine (EFdA; MK8591) is a novel nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in early clinical development as a long-acting orally administered drug and in a long-acting polymer implant. Broadly neutralizing and cell-entry inhibitor monoclonal antibodies have demonstrated potent antiviral activity in early human trials; however, there is substantial baseline resistance. In addition, monotherapy leads to rapid resistance in those with baseline susceptibility.

SUMMARY

Long-acting antiretroviral chemical compounds and monoclonal antibodies have demonstrated potent anti-HIV activity in the early-stage clinical investigations, and are actively being studied in advanced clinical trials for treatment and prevention. Strategies to manage toxicities and waning drug levels of chemical compounds, as well as primary and secondary resistance to current monoclonal antibodies are important considerations.

Reduction of medical hospitalizations in veterans with schizophrenia using home telehealth

This study tested the hypothesis that addition of telehealth to Intensive Case Monitoring (ICM) would reduce hospital admissions in Veterans with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder admitted for psychiatric care in response to suicidal behavior. Participants (n =51) were randomized to ICM or ICM plus telehealth monitoring. Telehealth participants responded to daily electronic queries about depression, suicidality, and medication adherence. Comparisons revealed that participants in the telehealth group had significantly less medical hospitalizations than the control group. This study found that telehealth augmentation is related to decreased number and length of medical hospitalizations in Veterans with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.

Medication adherence in patients with schizophrenia

Medication nonadherence is common among patients with schizophrenia and due to a variety of factors including lack of insight, psychopathology, substance use disorder, issues associated with treatment, stigma, fragmentation of care, cultural influences, and socioeconomic status. Among this population, nonadherence is problematic because it can lead to decompensation or exacerbation of symptoms, relapse, rehospitalization or greater use of emergency psychiatric services, functional decline, and increased risk of death. Psychoeducational approaches alone are ineffective, but in combination with behavioral interventions, appear to be effective. Involving the patient's support system, in addition to other interventions, can improve treatment adherence. Many medication-related factors, such as effectiveness and tolerability of antipsychotics, regimen complexity, and past medication trials impact appropriate medication use. Therefore, optimizing the patient's pharmacotherapeutic regimens can improve adherence. Additional factors favorably influencing adherence include involving the patient in their treatment, fostering a therapeutic alliance, implementing/using reminder systems, and addressing substance use disorder. Medication nonadherence arises from multiple reasons that vary between patients. Thus, the most effective strategies to improve adherence are multifactorial and may involve both psychoeducational and behavioral techniques, as well as previously listed approaches. Strategies should be targeted toward the patient and their support system, whenever possible, to further improve the chances of appropriate medication use. Recognizing that all patients with schizophrenia are at risk for medication nonadherence is important. No one technique has been shown to be most effective; therefore, the risk for nonadherence should continually be assessed and multiple strategies should be targeted to the patient (and caregiver) and repeatedly implemented throughout the course of the patient's illness.

Assessing patient-rated vs. clinician-rated adherence to the therapy in treatment resistant schizophrenia, schizophrenia responders, and non-schizophrenia patients

The present study evaluated consistency, reliability, and determinants of two real-world measures of adherence to prescription in 57 schizophrenia and 61 non-schizophrenia patients. Treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS) was additionally diagnosed in 28 of the schizophrenia patients. Patients were screened for clinical severity, cognitive functioning, and adherence by 10-item Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI-10) or Adherence-to-Therapy (AtT), a clinician-rated tool developed by our group. DAI-10 and AtT scores showed a significant correlation (p=0.039; ρ=0.21; df=103). Compared to the DAI-10 scale, a higher number of variables were associated with AtT. In schizophrenia and TRS patients, substance abuse was the only significant predictor of lower DAI-10 score (p=0.027, F=5.2, R²=0.07, and p=0.06, F=8.9, R²=0.23, respectively). Lower AtT score was significantly associated with first-generation antipsychotic use (p=0.001, RR: 2.00 [1.40-2.87]), positive symptoms (p=0.02, RR: 1.63 [1.05-2.53]), impaired verbal fluency (p=0.01, RR: 1.88 [0.81-4.32]) or problem solving (p=0.01, RR: 2.14 [0.92-4.98]). AtT, but not DAI-10, score correlated with the score on the Personal and Social Performance scale (p=0.02, F=5.86, R²=0.08). Overall, AtT score was predicted by pharmacological, psychopathological, and cognitive factors, and predictive of psychosocial functioning. Therefore, AtT measure may represent a convenient and practical tool to evaluate schizophrenia patients' adherence.

Switching from oral atypical antipsychotic monotherapy to paliperidone palmitate once-monthly in non-acute patients with schizophrenia: A prospective, open-label, interventional study

RATIONALE

Long-acting injectable antipsychotic therapies may offer benefits over oral antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the safety, tolerability, and treatment response of paliperidone palmitate once-monthly in non-acute but symptomatic adult patients switched from previously unsuccessful monotherapy with frequently used oral atypical antipsychotics.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective, interventional, single-arm, international, multicenter, open-label, 6-month study.

RESULTS

The patients (N = 472) were switched to paliperidone palmitate once-monthly (PP1M) from daily oral treatment with either aripiprazole (n = 46), olanzapine (n = 87), paliperidone extended-release (n = 104), quetiapine (n = 44), or risperidone (n = 191). In all groups, mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total (p < 0.0001) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity scores improved significantly (p = 0.0004 to p < 0.0001). An improvement of ≥50 % in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score was observed in 21.7 % (aripiprazole), 29.9 % (olanzapine), 29.8 % (paliperidone extended-release), 27.3 % (quetiapine), and 37.2 % (risperidone) of patients. The patients showed significant improvements in the Personal and Social Performance score (aripiprazole p = 0.0409, all others p ≤ 0.0015); Mini International Classification of Functionality, Disability and Health Rating for Activity and Participation Disorders in Psychological Illnesses total scores (all p < 0.01); and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication Global Satisfaction score (olanzapine and risperidone p < 0.0001, quetiapine p = 0.0465, paliperidone extended-release p = 0.0571, aripiprazole p = NS). Paliperidone palmitate once-monthly was well tolerated, presenting no new safety signals.

CONCLUSIONS

These data illustrate that stable, non-acute but symptomatic patients on oral antipsychotic monotherapy may show clinically meaningful improvement of symptoms, functioning, and treatment satisfaction after direct transition to PP1M. The findings are limited by the naturalistic study design; thus, further studies are required to confirm the current findings.

Clinical benefits and impact of early use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics for schizophrenia

AIM

Results from clinical trials support the use of oral antipsychotics for treatment of early or first-episode psychosis in patients with schizophrenia. This paper will review literature on the advantages of early initiation of treatment for schizophrenia and the clinical benefits of early use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs).

METHOD

A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify published literature on the use of LAIs early in the treatment of schizophrenia.

RESULTS

Although there is a higher response rate to initial antipsychotic treatment for a first-episode of schizophrenia than with subsequent antipsychotic treatment, we have not effectively addressed this issue. Poor adherence to treatment is a primary cause of relapse and rehospitalization in subsequent years and was associated with higher relapse rates resulting in devastating effects and substantial economic burden. The costs of nonadherence were estimated to be $1.48 billion. Thus, a major challenge with the treatment of schizophrenia is changing poor adherence to persistence with antipsychotic therapy. LAIs are known to be at least as effective as oral antipsychotics for treating schizophrenia, and yet are underutilized. Further, LAIs address many of the problems associated with adherence to oral therapy. Recent evidence suggests that LAIs are effective for treating first-episode psychosis and for early initiation of treatment for schizophrenia.

CONCLUSION

Although consistent antipsychotic treatment represents a critical part of treatment, a person-centred approach to treating schizophrenia is essential for all aspects of care, including establishing and maintaining a therapeutic alliance, strengthening shared decision-making and adherence, and achieving long-lasting recovery.

Critical appraisal of 3-monthly paliperidone depot injections in the treatment of schizophrenia

Aims

Three-monthly injections of paliperidone palmitate (PP-3M) represent a new and recently introduced long-acting antipsychotic therapeutic option. This review focuses on available data relating to the efficacy and safety of PP-3M and its position in the current therapeutic scenario.

Method

An analysis of PubMed, Scopus, and ISI Web of Knowledge databases was conducted, and all available papers on PP-3M, including poster presentations, were selected and considered for the purpose of the present review. Findings: to date, three full papers have been published, the first, a Phase 1 randomized, open label study investigating the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of the drug; the second, a Phase 3 double blind study vs placebo focusing on efficacy and tolerability; and the last relating to the practical use of PP-3M. The five posters identified describe data reported in the above-cited papers. Overall, the pharmacokinetic findings obtained in these studies highlight the feasibility of administering PP-3M on a 3-monthly basis, subsequent to the administration of four 1-monthly injections of PP at doses 3.5 times higher than the stabilized dose of 1-monthly injections of PP (ie, 175, 300, 450, and 525 mgs). The published studies highlight a significantly longer time to relapse compared to placebo, and significantly better results compared to placebo for all secondary end-points (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale, Personal and Social Performance Scale scores), in addition to reasonably good safety and tolerability profiles.

Conclusion

PP-3M emerges as a potential candidate for use as a first-line long-acting agent in the maintenance treatment of patients with schizophrenia. Further studies should however be conducted to confirm this expectation. In view of its efficacy, tolerability, and safety, together with the longer timespan between injections, PP-3M currently represents one of the best available options, and may contribute towards addressing the issue of poor adherence, even in early psychosis.

Effectiveness of long-acting paliperidone palmitate in borderline personality disorder

The aim of the present study is to test the efficacy of palmitate paliperidone long-acting injection for patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD). A total of 16 patients with BPD were treated with intramuscular paliperidone palmitate (IMPP) over 12 weeks. Effectiveness measures included the CGI-BPD, HARS, MADRS, BIS-11, and STAXI-2. Functional improvement was assessed using the Global Assessment of Functioning scale. A list of adverse events was provided to clinicians and patients. Treatment with IMPP was associated with a significant average reduction of 1.6 (95% confidence interval: 1192-2008; P>0.01) in CGI-BPD scores and an average increase of psychosocial functioning as scored by the Global Assessment of Functioning scale of 13.3 (95% confidence interval: 8.35-18.31; P>0.01) was obtained. The treatment decreased impulsive-disruptive behaviors and improved general functioning. An acceptable tolerance was observed. The average weight gain was clinically irrelevant despite being statistically significant. No other relevant adverse side effects were reported, with the exception of galactorrhea, which required suspension of treatment in three patients. IMPP seems to be a well-tolerated alternative to other second-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of BPD. More controlled studies replicating these results should be proposed in the future.

Paliperidone palmitate in non-acute patients with schizophrenia previously unsuccessfully treated with risperidone long-acting therapy or frequently used conventional depot antipsychotics

PALMFlexS, a prospective multicentre, open-label, 6-month, phase IIIb interventional study, explored tolerability, safety and treatment response in adults (n = 231) with non-acute but symptomatic schizophrenia switching to flexibly dosed paliperidone palmitate (PP) after unsuccessful treatment with risperidone long-acting injectable therapy (RLAT) or conventional depot antipsychotics (APs). Treatment response was measured by change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score from baseline (BL) to last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) endpoint (EP). Safety and tolerability assessments included Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS) total score and treatment-emergent adverse events. Significant reductions in mean PANSS total score were observed for all groups (-7.5 to -10.6; p ⩽ 0.01 [BL to LOCF EP]). After switching to PP, more than 50% of all patients achieved ⩾20% and one-third of RLAT-treated patients even achieved ⩾50% improvement in PANSS total score. Across groups, there were significant improvements (p < 0.05) in symptom severity as measured by Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S; trend for improvement with RLAT; p = 0.0568), subjective well-being, medication satisfaction, and patient functioning with PP. PP was generally well tolerated. Clinically relevant benefits were observed in non-acute patients with schizophrenia switched from RLAT or conventional depot APs to PP.

Treatment adherence in schizophrenia: a patient-level meta-analysis of combined CATIE and EUFEST studies

The Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) obtained a sample of 1493 chronic schizophrenia patients. The European First Episode Schizophrenia Trial (EUFEST) studied a sample of 498 patients. We have combined these two samples to study the predictors and correlates of adherence to treatment. Here we report on adherence to pharmacological treatment at the six and twelve month assessments of these trials with a combined subsample of 1154 schizophrenia patients. Individual patients׳ data were used for analyses. We used logistic regression to examine the effects of substance use, akathisia, parkinsonism, dyskinesia, hostility, and insight on pharmacological adherence. The results showed that reduced adherence to pharmacological treatment was associated with substance use (p=0.0003), higher levels of hostility (p=0.0002), and impaired insight (p<0.0001). Furthermore, poor adherence to study medication was associated with earlier discontinuation in the combined data. The clinical implications of the results point to the importance of routine assessments and interventions to address patients׳ insight and comorbid substance use and the establishment of therapeutic alliance.

Rates and predictors of adherence to psychotropic medications in children with autism spectrum disorders

Medication adherence in children is poor, particularly among those with chronic or mental health disorders. However, adherence has not been fully assessed in autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). The validated proportion of days covered method was used to quantify adherence to psychotropic medication in Medicaid-eligible children who met diagnostic criteria for ASD between 2000 and 2008 (N = 628). Among children prescribed attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications, antidepressants, or antipsychotics, 44, 40 and 52 % were adherent respectively. Aggressive behaviors and abnormalities in eating, drinking, and/or sleeping, co-occurring ADHD, and the Medication Regimen Complexity Index were the most significant predictors of adherence rather than demographics or core deficits of ASD. Identifying barriers to adherence in ASD may ultimately lead to improved treatment outcomes.

Psychiatrists' awareness of partial- and non-adherence to antipsychotic medication in schizophrenia: results from the Australian ADHES survey

OBJECTIVES

The Adherence in Schizophrenia (ADHES) initiative aimed to assess physicians' perspectives about treatment adherence in people with schizophrenia, and assess strategies to improve adherence.

METHODS

Between March and April 2012, a 20-question survey was delivered to Australian psychiatrists (n = 3400). These anonymous surveys were returned by mail. The survey asked about the demographics of participating psychiatrists and the respondents' perceptions of different factors that affect the adherence of people with schizophrenia to their treatment with antipsychotic medications. Adherence was defined by the proportion of prescribed doses taken: non-adherence, if < 30%; partial-adherence, 30%-90%; and adherent, > 90%. Data were reported descriptively and were not weighted.

RESULTS

Respondent psychiatrists (n = 406; response rate 12%) reported that one-half (51%) of people with schizophrenia were either non-adherent (20%) or only partially adherent (31%). This was despite most (72%) psychiatrists' reporting that they assessed adherence to medication at every visit. The main reported reasons for medication discontinuation were: lack of insight (45%), drug or alcohol abuse (3%), or side effects (29%). The preferred strategies for improving adherence were switching to or adding a long-acting antipsychotic (40%), or simplifying the medication regimen (30%).

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of adherence to antipsychotic medication remains a problem. More proactive management is required, to improve adherence and long-term outcomes.

Intramuscular long-acting paliperidone palmitate in acute patients with schizophrenia unsuccessfully treated with oral antipsychotics

In this prospective multicentre, open-label, 6-month study (Paliperidone Palmitate Flexible Dosing in Schizophrenia [PALMFlexS]), tolerability, safety and treatment response with paliperidone palmitate (PP) were explored in patients with acute symptoms of schizophrenia following switching from previously unsuccessful treatment with oral antipsychotics. This pragmatic study was conducted in a large, more representative sample of the general schizophrenia population compared to randomized controlled pivotal trials, to specifically mimic real-world clinical situations. After initiation on Day 1 and Day 8, patients received PP once monthly at flexible doses (50-150mgeq.) intramuscularly. The primary efficacy outcome was defined as the percentage of patients achieving ≥30% improvement in PANSS total score from baseline (BL) to last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) endpoint (EP). Safety and tolerability assessments included Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS) total score and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Overall, 212 patients received PP at least once after switching from oral antipsychotics, primarily due to lack of efficacy (45.8%). Significant improvements from BL in mean (SD) PANSS total score were observed from Day 8 onwards (BL to LOCF EP: -31.0 [29.0]; p<0.0001). At endpoint, two-thirds (66.7%) and 43.5% of patients achieved a ≥30% and ≥50% improvement in mean PANSS total score, respectively. PP was associated with significant improvements across secondary measures of symptom severity, subjective well-being, medication satisfaction, illness-related disorders of activity and participation, and patient functioning (p<0.0001; BL to LOCF EP). PP was generally well tolerated, with significant reductions in ESRS total score (p<0.0001) and mainly mild-to-moderate TEAEs. TEAEs reported in ≥5% of patients were injection-site pain (13.7%), insomnia (10.8%), psychotic disorder (10.4%), headache and anxiety (both 6.1%). The PALMFlexS study findings provide valuable pragmatic clinical data on PP treatment in patients with acute schizophrenia previously unsuccessfully treated with oral antipsychotics.

Measuring adherence to medication in schizophrenia: the relationship between attitudes toward drug therapy and plasma levels of new-generation antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

Nonadherence to medication is still a major problem in the treatment of schizophrenia. The current longitudinal study investigated whether the patients' attitudes toward treatment correlated with the ratio of observed vs expected plasma levels of antipsychotic drugs as an objective measurement of adherence.

METHODS

Data of patients starting monotherapy with a new-generation antipsychotic were collected 2, 4, and 12 weeks after the initiation of treatment. Next to the assessment of patients' attitudes toward medication by means of the Drug Attitude Inventory, the ratio of the observed vs expected plasma level was calculated. Antipsychotic-induced side effects were evaluated by means of the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser Side Effect Rating Scale.

RESULTS

A total of 93 patients were eligible for statistical analysis. About one-half of the ratios of observed vs expected plasma levels ranged from 0.5 to 2 and were considered normal, whereas the other ratios were considered either too low (<0.5) or too high (>2). No consistent correlation between patients' attitude toward drug therapy and the individual ratios of observed vs expected plasma levels of medication was detected. This finding was not affected by side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight the importance of recognizing the complex nature of adherence to medication in schizophrenia patients. Importantly, we found no consistent correlation between subjective and objective measures of medication adherence. Therefore, monitoring adherence to medication remains a challenge in clinical practice.

Pharmacy switch of antipsychotic medications: patient's perspective

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Several studies have raised concerns over consequences of brand-to-generic and generic-to-generic pharmacy-generated medication substitutions in psychiatric and non-psychiatric patients. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess behavioral and emotional responses of patients with schizophrenia to antipsychotic medication substitution performed by pharmacies.

METHODS

A group of Polish ambulatory patients with schizophrenia (n = 196) chronically treated with antipsychotic medications were asked whether antipsychotic medication substitution had been proposed by a pharmacist in the last 12 months. Ninety-nine patients answering positively were administered more questions addressing the patient's emotional and behavioral response to the pharmacy proposal.

RESULTS

The most important findings of the present study can be summarized as follows: (1) approximately half of the patients were confronted with a pharmacy proposal to switch their antipsychotic medications in the last 12 months, (2) one quarter of these patients did not accept the pharmacy switch, (3) a substantial proportion of patients (>40 %) did not receive any explanation from a pharmacist offering medication substitution, (4) pharmacy-generated substitution proposals were mainly associated with negative patient attitudes and negative emotional responses, (5) substitution proposals provoked an unscheduled psychiatric visit in approx. 10 % of patients, (6) despite the negative attitudes reported by patients, the pharmacy switch rarely led to treatment discontinuation, but did provoke a change in drug dosing in 7 % of patients accepting the switch.

CONCLUSIONS

A pharmacy proposal to switch their antipsychotic medications is a relatively common experience of Polish ambulatory patients with schizophrenia. Pharmacy-generated substitution proposals are mainly associated with negative patient attitudes, but rarely lead to antipsychotic treatment discontinuation in this group of patients.

A prospective flexible-dose study of paliperidone palmitate in nonacute but symptomatic patients with schizophrenia previously unsuccessfully treated with oral antipsychotic agents

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to explore the tolerability, safety, and treatment response of flexible doses of once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP) in the subset of nonacute but symptomatic adult patients with schizophrenia previously unsuccessfully treated with oral antipsychotic agents in the PALMFlexS (Paliperidone Palmitate Flexible Dosing in Schizophrenia) study.

METHODS

This was an interventional, single-arm, international, multicenter, unblinded, 6-month study performed in patients with schizophrenia. Patients were categorized according to reasons for switching. In patients switching because of lack of efficacy or for other reasons, primary efficacy outcomes were the proportion achieving treatment response (defined as ≥20% improvement in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS] total score from baseline to last-observation-carried-forward end point) and maintained efficacy (defined as noninferiority in the change in PANSS total score at end point versus baseline [Schuirmann's test]), respectively.

FINDINGS

A total of 593 patients (intention-to-treat population) were enrolled: 63.1% were male; their mean (SD) age was 38.4 (11.8) years; and 78.6% had paranoid schizophrenia. The main reasons for transition to PP were patient's wish (n = 259 [43.7%]), lack of efficacy (n = 144 [24.3%]), lack of compliance (n = 138 [23.3%]), and lack of tolerability (n = 52 [8.8%]) with the previous oral antipsychotic medication. The recommended PP initiation regimen (150 milligram equivalents [mg eq] day 1 and 100 mg eq day 8) was administered in 93.9% of patients. Mean PANSS total score decreased from 71.5 (14.6) at baseline to 59.7 (18.1) at end point (mean change, -11.7 [15.9]; 95% CI, -13.0 to -10.5; P < 0.0001). Sixty-four percent of patients showed an improvement of ≥20% in PANSS total score, and the percentage of patients rated mildly ill or less in Clinical Global Impression-Severity increased from 31.8% to 63.2%. Mean personal and social performance total score (SD) increased (ie, improved) significantly for all patients from baseline to end point (58.1 [13.4] to 66.1 [15.7]; P < 0.0001).

IMPLICATIONS

The PALMFlexS study is a pragmatic interventional study compared with randomized controlled trials, conducted in a large, more representative sample of patients with schizophrenia, and designed specifically to mimic real-world clinical situations. The findings support the results from randomized controlled studies. They also demonstrate that a clinically relevant treatment response is possible in patients who are considered to be clinically stable by their physician, supporting the use of flexibly dosed PP in such patients. Clinical trials.gov number: NCT01281527.

Factors associated with early response to olanzapine and clinical and functional outcomes of early responders treated for schizophrenia in the People's Republic of China

BACKGROUND

The aims of this analysis were to identify factors associated with early response (at 4 weeks) to olanzapine treatment and to assess whether early response is associated with better longer-term outcomes for patients with schizophrenia in the People's Republic of China.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis of a multi-country, 6-month, prospective, observational study of outpatients with schizophrenia or bipolar mania who initiated or switched to treatment with oral olanzapine was conducted using data from the Chinese schizophrenia subgroup (n=330). Factors associated with early response were identified using a stepwise logistic regression with baseline clinical characteristics, baseline participation in a weight control program, and adherence with antipsychotics during the first 4 weeks of treatment. Mixed models for repeated measures with baseline covariates were used to compare outcomes over time between early responders and early nonresponders to olanzapine.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty patients (40%) achieved an early response. Early response was independently predicted by higher baseline Clinical Global Impressions-Severity score (odds ratio [OR] 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-1.97), fewer years since first diagnosis (OR 0.94, CI 0.90-0.98), a greater number of social activities (OR 1.22, CI 1.05-1.40), participation in a weight control program (OR 1.81, CI 1.04-3.15), and high adherence with antipsychotics during the first 4 weeks of treatment (OR 2.98, CI 1.59-5.58). Relative to early nonresponders, early responders were significantly more likely to meet treatment response criteria at endpoint, had significantly greater symptom improvement (Clinical Global Impressions-Severity), and had significantly greater improvement in functional outcomes (all P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

High levels of adherence to prescribed antipsychotics and participation in a weight control program were associated with early response to olanzapine in Chinese patients with schizophrenia. Early response was associated with greater improvement in symptomatic, functional, and quality of life outcomes at 6 months compared with early nonresponse. Current findings are consistent with previous research outside of the People's Republic of China.

Randomized trial of clozapine vs. risperidone in treatment-naïve first-episode schizophrenia: results after one year

In first-episode patients with psychosis, clozapine may be potentially valuable as an initial treatment seeking to limit early on clinical and cognitive deterioration. Nevertheless, until recently its restricted use has limited the study of this possibility. Our research group is developing a non-commercial, multicentric and open label study on the differential efficacy between clozapine and risperidone in first-episode schizophrenia. In this paper, we present the results related to clinical variables after a one-year follow-up. So far, we have recruited 30 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder with illness duration of less than two years. The patients had not received any previous treatment and they were randomized to treatment with clozapine or risperidone. Our results indicate that on average, patients on clozapine adhered to their original treatment for a longer time period than patients on risperidone. By last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis, patients on clozapine and risperidone displayed similar clinical improvements, although marginally greater improvements in positive and total symptoms scores were found in the clozapine group. At the 12-month point we observed a marginal improvement in negative symptom scores in patients on clozapine. Subjective secondary effects, as measured with the Udvalg for KliniskeUndersøgelser (UKU) scale, correlated negatively with negative symptoms at follow-up. Our data, although preliminary, suggest that clozapine may have a slightly superior efficacy in the initial year of treatment of first-episode treatment-naïve patients with schizophrenia, and this can be explained for the most part by greater adherence to this treatment.

Psychiatrists' awareness of adherence to antipsychotic medication in patients with schizophrenia: results from a survey conducted across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa

BACKGROUND

Nonadherence is common among patients with schizophrenia, although the rates vary according to means of assessment and patient population. Failure to adhere to medication can have a major impact on the course of illness and treatment outcomes, including increasing the risk of relapse and rehospitalization. Understanding psychiatrists' perception of the causes and consequences of nonadherence is crucial to addressing adherence problems effectively.

METHODS

The Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) Spanish Adherencia Terapéutica en la Esquizofrenia (ADHES) survey was conducted by questionnaire during January-March 2010 among psychiatrists treating patients with schizophrenia in 36 countries. The survey comprised 20 questions. In addition to recording the demographic details of the 4722 respondents (~12% response rate), it canvassed their preferred methods of assessing adherence, their perceptions of adherence rates, reasons for nonadherence, and strategies to improve adherence.

RESULTS

Psychiatrists estimated that 53% of their patients with schizophrenia were partially/nonadherent during the previous month. They estimated only one-third of patients who deteriorated after stopping medication were able to attribute this to nonadherence. Psychiatrists assessed adherence most often by patient interview. Lack of insight was viewed as the most important cause of medication discontinuation, followed by patients feeling better and thinking their medication unnecessary, and experiencing undesirable side effects. Considerably fewer psychiatrists viewed insufficient efficacy, cognitive impairment, or drug/alcohol abuse as the most important reasons for their patients stopping medication.

CONCLUSION

Psychiatrists throughout EMEA recognize the impact of partial/nonadherence to medication, with patient enquiry being the most commonly used means of assessment. There remains a need for more proactive management of patients with schizophrenia, particularly in increasing patient insight of their illness in order to improve adherence and minimize the consequences of relapse. Strategies focused on raising awareness of the importance of adherence are also warranted, with the aim of improving patient outcomes in schizophrenia.

Current approaches to treatments for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, part II: psychosocial interventions and patient-focused perspectives in psychiatric care

Schizophrenia is a disabling psychiatric illness associated with disruptions in cognition, emotion, and psychosocial and occupational functioning. Increasing evidence shows that psychosocial interventions for people with schizophrenia, as an adjunct to medications or usual psychiatric care, can reduce psychotic symptoms and relapse and improve patients' long-term outcomes such as recovery, remission, and illness progression. This critical review of the literature was conducted to identify the common approaches to psychosocial interventions for people with schizophrenia. Treatment planning and outcomes were also explored and discussed to better understand the effects of these interventions in terms of person-focused perspectives such as their perceived quality of life and satisfaction and their acceptability and adherence to treatments or services received. We searched major health care databases such as EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycLIT and identified relevant literature in English from these databases. Their reference lists were screened, and studies were selected if they met the criteria of using a randomized controlled trial or systematic review design, giving a clear description of the interventions used, and having a study sample of people primarily diagnosed with schizophrenia. Five main approaches to psychosocial intervention had been used for the treatment of schizophrenia: cognitive therapy (cognitive behavioral and cognitive remediation therapy), psychoeducation, family intervention, social skills training, and assertive community treatment. Most of these five approaches applied to people with schizophrenia have demonstrated satisfactory levels of short- to medium-term clinical efficacy in terms of symptom control or reduction, level of functioning, and/or relapse rate. However, the comparative effects between these five approaches have not been well studied; thus, we are not able to clearly understand the superiority of any of these interventions. With the exception of patient relapse, the longer-term (eg, >2 years) effects of these approaches on most psychosocial outcomes are not well-established among these patients. Despite the fact that patients' perspectives on treatment and care have been increasingly concerned, not many studies have evaluated the effect of interventions on this perspective, and where they did, the findings were inconclusive. To conclude, current approaches to psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia have their strengths and weaknesses, particularly indicating limited evidence on long-term effects. To improve the longer-term outcomes of people with schizophrenia, future treatment strategies should focus on risk identification, early intervention, person-focused therapy, partnership with family caregivers, and the integration of evidence-based psychosocial interventions into existing services.