1
|
Naaz A, Turnquist HR, Gorantla VS, Little SR. Drug delivery strategies for local immunomodulation in transplantation: Bridging the translational gap. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2024; 213:115429. [PMID: 39142608 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2024.115429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 08/07/2024] [Accepted: 08/11/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024]
Abstract
Drug delivery strategies for local immunomodulation hold tremendous promise compared to current clinical gold-standard systemic immunosuppression as they could improve the benefit to risk ratio of life-saving or life-enhancing transplants. Such strategies have facilitated prolonged graft survival in animal models at lower drug doses while minimizing off-target effects. Despite the promising outcomes in preclinical animal studies, progression of these strategies to clinical trials has faced challenges. A comprehensive understanding of the translational barriers is a critical first step towards clinical validation of effective immunomodulatory drug delivery protocols proven for safety and tolerability in pre-clinical animal models. This review overviews the current state-of-the-art in local immunomodulatory strategies for transplantation and outlines the key challenges hindering their clinical translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afsana Naaz
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States; Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States.
| | - Heth R Turnquist
- Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States; Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States; Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, United States.
| | - Vijay S Gorantla
- McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, United States; Departments of Surgery, Ophthalmology and Bioengineering, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest Institute of Regenerative Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, 27101, United States.
| | - Steven R Little
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States; Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States; Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, United States; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219, United States; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Haren E, van Vugt LK, Wijbenga N, van der Sijs H, Hellemons ME. Recurrent treatment of refractory acute cellular rejection with alemtuzumab after lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2024:S1053-2498(24)01738-8. [PMID: 39009290 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024] Open
Abstract
We present an exceptional case of a lung transplant recipient successfully treated by multiple courses of alemtuzumab for refractory acute cellular rejection (ACR). The patient experienced multiple episodes of ACR following the transplantation procedure. Alemtuzumab was initiated as a third-line rejection treatment and was repeated 6 times. Each treatment course resulted in complete recovery of the pulmonary function and depletion of T- and B-lymphocytes and natural killer cells (NK cells). The onset of rejection was consistently preceded by the recovery of NK cells, while T- and B-lymphocytes remained depleted. This suggests a rejection process mediated by NK cells. This case contributes to recent research findings suggesting that NK cells play a significant role in ACR in lung transplant recipients and stresses the importance to further investigate the role of NK cells in rejection. Furthermore, it demonstrates that ACR following lung transplantation can be repeatedly managed by treatment with alemtuzumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva van Haren
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Lukas K van Vugt
- Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nynke Wijbenga
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Heleen van der Sijs
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Merel E Hellemons
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schlegel LS, Werbrouck C, Boettcher M, Schlegel P. Universal CAR 2.0 to overcome current limitations in CAR therapy. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1383894. [PMID: 38962014 PMCID: PMC11219820 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1383894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has effectively complemented the treatment of advanced relapsed and refractory hematological cancers. The remarkable achievements of CD19- and BCMA-CAR T therapies have raised high expectations within the fields of hematology and oncology. These groundbreaking successes are propelling a collective aspiration to extend the reach of CAR therapies beyond B-lineage malignancies. Advanced CAR technologies have created a momentum to surmount the limitations of conventional CAR concepts. Most importantly, innovations that enable combinatorial targeting to address target antigen heterogeneity, using versatile adapter CAR concepts in conjunction with recent transformative next-generation CAR design, offer the promise to overcome both the bottleneck associated with CAR manufacturing and patient-individualized treatment regimens. In this comprehensive review, we delineate the fundamental prerequisites, navigate through pivotal challenges, and elucidate strategic approaches, all aimed at paving the way for the future establishment of multitargeted immunotherapies using universal CAR technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Sophie Schlegel
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Coralie Werbrouck
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Boettcher
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Schlegel
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Westmead Children’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Engen RM, Bartosh SM. Long-term outcomes of two-dose alemtuzumab induction in pediatric kidney transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14753. [PMID: 38623881 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alemtuzumab is a lymphocyte depleting agent used for induction in kidney transplant, but long-term information on its use in pediatric recipients remains sparse. METHODS We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of 57 pediatric kidney transplant recipients receiving alemtuzumab 20 mg/m2/dose ×2 doses for induction immunosuppression. All patients underwent surveillance biopsies, and 91.3% underwent steroid withdrawal by day 4 post-transplant. Outcomes of interest included graft survival, development of donor specific antibodies (DSA), incidence of viremia and PTLD, and duration of lymphopenia. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 7.9 years (IQR 5-13.6 years). Median graft survival was 16.5 years (95% CI 11.6-unknown). DSA developed in 36.5% at a median of 944 days (IQR 252-2113 days). Incidences of BK polyomavirus DNAemia (BKPyV-DNAemia), CMV DNAemia, and EBV DNAemia were 38.6%, 22.8%, and 14%, respectively; one patient developed PTLD at 13.3 years post-transplant. Median duration of lymphopenia was 365 days (IQR 168-713 days); 19.3% of patients remained lymphopenic at 3 years post-transplant. There was no association between duration of lymphopenia and graft survival, rejection, DSA detection, or viremia. CONCLUSIONS A two-dose alemtuzumab induction protocol can have excellent outcomes with a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression regimen. More comprehensive, multicenter, comparative studies of pediatric kidney transplant are needed to improve long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Engen
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Sharon M Bartosh
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bourdin V, Fossé Q, Lambotte O, Joly B, Coppo P, Anguel N, Labeyrie C. Alemtuzumab-induced immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: A newly described drug-related autoimmune disease. Br J Haematol 2024; 204:1459-1463. [PMID: 38112161 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare and life-threatening disease that may result from drug exposure. We report a case of iTTP occurring in a 39-year-old patient, 45 months following introduction of the anti-CD52 lymphoid cell depleting monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab, to treat a relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Treatment consisted in plasma exchange, corticosteroids and caplacizumab, allowing clinical remission 3 months after the diagnosis, attested by the absence of thrombocytopenia and recovery of ADAMTS-13 activity. As other autoimmune disorders, iTTP may occur following alemtuzumab. This diagnosis should be suspected in patients with features of thrombotic microangiopathy following this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Bourdin
- Internal Medicine Department, Hôpital Bicêtre, APHP, Université Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Q Fossé
- AP-HP, Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Bicêtre, DMU CORREVE, Inserm UMR S_999, FHU SEPSIS, Groupe de Recherche Clinique CARMAS, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - O Lambotte
- Internal Medicine Department, Hôpital Bicêtre, APHP, Université Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- Université Paris Saclay, Inserm, CEA, UMR 1184 ImVA-HB, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - B Joly
- Biologic Hematology Department, Hopital Lariboisière and EA3518, Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis, APHP.Nord, Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France
- French Reference Center for Thrombotic Microangiopathies (CNR-MAT), Saint Antoine University Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - P Coppo
- French Reference Center for Thrombotic Microangiopathies (CNR-MAT), Saint Antoine University Hospital, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
- Hematology Department, Hopital Saint-Antoine, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - N Anguel
- AP-HP, Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Bicêtre, DMU CORREVE, Inserm UMR S_999, FHU SEPSIS, Groupe de Recherche Clinique CARMAS, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - C Labeyrie
- Department of Neurology, Hopital Bicêtre, APHP, Université Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Vugt LK, van der Zwan M, Clahsen-van Groningen MC, van Agteren M, Hullegie-Peelen DM, De Winter BCM, Reinders MEJ, Miranda Afonso P, Hesselink DA. A Decade of Experience With Alemtuzumab Therapy for Severe or Glucocorticoid-Resistant Kidney Transplant Rejection. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11834. [PMID: 38020744 PMCID: PMC10660975 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Alemtuzumab is used as lymphocyte-depleting therapy for severe or glucocorticoid-resistant kidney transplant rejection. However, the long-term efficacy and toxicity of alemtuzumab therapy are unclear. Therefore, all cases of alemtuzumab anti-rejection therapy between 2012 and 2022 in our institution were investigated. Graft survival, graft function, lymphocyte depletion, serious infections, malignancies, and patient survival were analyzed and compared with a reference cohort of transplanted patients who did not require alemtuzumab anti-rejection therapy. A total of 225 patients treated with alemtuzumab were identified and compared with a reference cohort of 1,668 patients. Over 60% of grafts was salvaged with alemtuzumab therapy, but graft survival was significantly poorer compared to the reference cohort. The median time of profound T- and B lymphocyte depletion was 272 and 344 days, respectively. Serious infection rate after alemtuzumab therapy was 54.1/100 person-years. The risk of death (hazard ratio 1.75, 95%-CI 1.28-2.39) and infection-related death (hazard ratio 2.36, 95%-CI 1.35-4.11) were higher in the alemtuzumab-treated cohort. In conclusion, alemtuzumab is an effective treatment for severe kidney transplant rejection, but causes long-lasting lymphocyte depletion and is associated with frequent infections and worse patient survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas K. van Vugt
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marieke van der Zwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, A. Schweitzer Hospital Dordrecht, Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marian C. Clahsen-van Groningen
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Madelon van Agteren
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Daphne M. Hullegie-Peelen
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Brenda C. M. De Winter
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marlies E. J. Reinders
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pedro Miranda Afonso
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Dennis A. Hesselink
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kurt-Şükür ED, Özçakar ZB, Keven K, Çakar N, Yalçınkaya F. Alemtuzumab as a Successful Antirejection Therapy: Experience in a Pediatric Renal Transplant Patient. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2023; 21:848-850. [PMID: 30806200 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2018.0203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Alemtuzumab is a monoclonal antibody against CD52 that is being increasingly used in renal transplantation as a lymphocyte-depleting agent. Data on alemtuzumab use in resistant rejection episodes are scarce, especially in children. Here, we present a 14-year-old renal transplant patient with acute cellular and humoral rejection who was treated with pulse steroids, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin with no success. He had 2 previous rejection episodes that were treated with antithymocyte globulin. In the third episode, alemtuzumab was given as a rescue therapy, and the patient benefited from the treatment. No complications were observed. Alemtuzumab can be a treatment option in pediatric patients with refractory rejection episodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eda Didem Kurt-Şükür
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Motta CM, Keller MD, Bollard CM. Applications of Virus specific T cell Therapies Post BMT. Semin Hematol 2022; 60:10-19. [PMID: 37080705 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2022.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been used as a curative standard of care for moderate to severe primary immunodeficiency disorders as well as relapsed hematologic malignancies for over 50 years [1,2]. However, chronic and refractory viral infections remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the immune deficient period following HSCT, where use of available antiviral pharmacotherapies is limited by toxicity and emerging resistance [3]. Adoptive immunotherapy using virus-specific T cells (VSTs) has been explored for over 2 decades [4,5] in patients post-HSCT and has been shown prior phase I-II studies to be safe and effective for treatment or preventions of viral infections including cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, BK virus, and adenovirus with minimal toxicity and low risk of graft vs host disease [6-9]. This review summarizes methodologies to generate VSTs the clinical results utilizing VST therapeutics and the challenges and future directions for the field.
Collapse
|
9
|
Baliu-Piqué M, Tesselaar K, Borghans JAM. Are homeostatic mechanisms aiding the reconstitution of the T-cell pool during lymphopenia in humans? Front Immunol 2022; 13:1059481. [PMID: 36483556 PMCID: PMC9723355 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1059481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
A timely recovery of T-cell numbers following haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is essential for preventing complications, such as increased risk of infection and disease relapse. In analogy to the occurrence of lymphopenia-induced proliferation in mice, T-cell dynamics in humans are thought to be homeostatically regulated in a cell density-dependent manner. The idea is that T cells divide faster and/or live longer when T-cell numbers are low, thereby helping the reconstitution of the T-cell pool. T-cell reconstitution after HSCT is, however, known to occur notoriously slowly. In fact, the evidence for the existence of homeostatic mechanisms in humans is quite ambiguous, since lymphopenia is often associated with infectious complications and immune activation, which confound the study of homeostatic regulation. This calls into question whether homeostatic mechanisms aid the reconstitution of the T-cell pool during lymphopenia in humans. Here we review the changes in T-cell dynamics in different situations of T-cell deficiency in humans, including the early development of the immune system after birth, healthy ageing, HIV infection, thymectomy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We discuss to what extent these changes in T-cell dynamics are a side-effect of increased immune activation during lymphopenia, and to what extent they truly reflect homeostatic mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - José A. M. Borghans
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Vugt LK, Schagen MR, de Weerd A, Reinders ME, de Winter BC, Hesselink DA. Investigational drugs for the treatment of kidney transplant rejection. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2022; 31:1087-1100. [PMID: 36175360 DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2022.2130751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Kidney transplant rejection remains an important clinical problem despite the development of effective immunosuppressive drug combination therapy. Two major types of rejection are recognized, namely T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), which have a different pathophysiology and are treated differently. Unfortunately, long-term outcomes of both TCMR and ABMR remain unsatisfactory despite current therapy. Hence, alternative therapeutic drugs are urgently needed. AREAS COVERED This review covers novel and investigational drugs for the pharmacological treatment of kidney transplant rejection. Potential therapeutic strategies and future directions are discussed. EXPERT OPINION The development of alternative pharmacologic treatment of rejection has focused mostly on ABMR, since this is the leading cause of kidney allograft loss and currently lacks an effective, evidence-based therapy. At present, there is insufficient high-quality evidence for any of the covered investigational drugs to support their use in ABMR. However, with the emergence of targeted therapies, this potential arises for individualized treatment strategies. In order to generate more high-quality evidence for such strategies and overcome the obstacles of classic, randomized, controlled trials, we advocate the implementation of adaptive trial designs and surrogate clinical endpoints. We believe such adaptive trial designs could help to understand the risks and benefits of promising drugs such as tocilizumab, clazakizumab, belimumab, and imlifidase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas K van Vugt
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maaike R Schagen
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annelies de Weerd
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marlies Ej Reinders
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Brenda Cm de Winter
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dennis A Hesselink
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hesselink DA, Hullegie-Peelen DM, van Vugt LK. Personalized anti-rejection therapy with alemtuzumab for kidney transplant recipients. Pharmacogenomics 2022; 23:567-570. [PMID: 35763447 DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2022-0071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis A Hesselink
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne M Hullegie-Peelen
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lukas K van Vugt
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Carey E, Ward N, Abdul-Hay M. Large granular lymphocytic leukemia cured by allogeneic stem cell transplant: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2022; 16:227. [PMID: 35672859 PMCID: PMC9175501 DOI: 10.1186/s13256-022-03447-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Large granular lymphocytic leukemia is a rare lymphocytic neoplasm that can pose a treatment challenge in patients with severe neutropenia in whom conventional therapies fail. We report one of the first cases in which allogeneic stem cell therapy was used as treatment for large granular lymphocytic leukemia. We report and discuss the case of a 42-year-old white Caucasian female who, despite multiple therapies including methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, prednisone, cyclosporine, and pentostatin, continued to show severe neutropenia and recurrent infections. The patient was treated successfully and cured by allogeneic stem cell transplant without any major complications. CONCLUSIONS The significant importance of this case report is the introduction of a new treatment algorithm for challenging cases of T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia in which standard care fails. We hope that this case report will raise awareness of the potential benefits of allogeneic stem cell transplant in the treatment of aggressive forms of T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Carey
- Department of Internal Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 240 East 38th street, 19th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Nicholas Ward
- Department of Pathology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maher Abdul-Hay
- Department of Internal Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 240 East 38th street, 19th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
- New York University Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hullegie-Peelen DM, van der Zwan M, Clahsen-van Groningen MC, Mustafa DAM, Baart SJ, Reinders MEJ, Baan CC, Hesselink DA. Clinical and Molecular Profiling to Develop a Potential Prediction Model for the Response to Alemtuzumab Therapy for Acute Kidney Transplant Rejection. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2022; 111:1155-1164. [PMID: 35202481 PMCID: PMC9314084 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Alemtuzumab, a monoclonal antibody that depletes CD52‐bearing immune cells, is an effective drug for the treatment of severe or glucocorticoid‐resistant acute kidney transplant rejection (AR). Patient‐specific predictions on treatment response are, however, urgently needed, given the severe side effects of alemtuzumab. This study developed a multidimensional prediction model with the aim of generating clinically useful prognostic scores for the response to alemtuzumab. Clinical and histological characteristics were collected retrospectively from patients who were treated with alemtuzumab for AR. In addition, targeted gene expression profiling of AR biopsy tissues was performed. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression modeling was used to construct the ALEMtuzumab for Acute Rejection (ALEMAR) prognostic score. Response to alemtuzumab was defined as patient and allograft survival and at least once an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) > 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 during the first 6 months after treatment. One hundred fifteen patients were included, of which 84 (73%) had a response to alemtuzumab. The ALEMAR‐score accurately predicted the chance of response. Gene expression analysis identified 13 differentially expressed genes between responders and nonresponders. The combination of the ALEMAR‐score and selected genes resulted in improved predictions of treatment response. The present preliminary prediction model is potentially helpful for the development of stratified alemtuzumab treatment for acute kidney transplant rejection but requires validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne M Hullegie-Peelen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke van der Zwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marian C Clahsen-van Groningen
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dana A M Mustafa
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,The Tumor Immuno-Pathology Laboratory, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sara J Baart
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies E J Reinders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carla C Baan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis A Hesselink
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Downes KJ, Sharova A, Boge CLK, Vader D, Mitrou M, Hayes M, Galetaki DM, Gianchetti L, Vella LA, Li Y. CMV infection and management among pediatric solid organ transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14220. [PMID: 34994041 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, the impact of asymptomatic CMV infections (ie, DNAemia) on clinical outcomes is not well established. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of children undergoing first SOT at our institution from January 2012 to June 2018. We evaluated the epidemiology of CMV infections and performed multivariable Cox regression to assess the association between CMV DNAemia without disease or CMV disease (syndrome or end-organ disease) on negative outcomes (death, re-transplantation, or moderate/severe rejection) within the first year after SOT. RESULTS Among 271 individuals, 43 (15.9%) developed ≥1 CMV infection during the first year after SOT. There were 56 unique CMV infections including 14 episodes of CMV disease. In 167 patients offered CMV prophylaxis, only 8 (4.8%) developed their first CMV DNAemia episode while on prophylaxis 32 developed CMV DNAemia after prophylaxis completion; only 1 episode of CMV disease occurred while on antiviral prophylaxis. When accounting for receipt of ATG, oral steroids, and number of immunosuppressives on a given day, CMV disease was more strongly associated with negative outcomes (Hazard Ratio (HR): 3.28, 95% CI: 0.73-14.64; p = .12) than CMV DNAemia without disease (HR 1.42, 95% CI: 0.19- 10.79; p = .74), although not to a statistically significant degree. CONCLUSIONS Most CMV infections occurred after completion of antiviral prophylaxis. CMV disease was more strongly associated with negative outcomes than asymptomatic CMV DNAemia and should be the focus of CMV prevention practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J Downes
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Pediatric IDEAS Research Group of the Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anna Sharova
- Pediatric IDEAS Research Group of the Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Craig L K Boge
- Pediatric IDEAS Research Group of the Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel Vader
- Pediatric IDEAS Research Group of the Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Marina Mitrou
- Pediatric IDEAS Research Group of the Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Molly Hayes
- Antimicrobial Stewardship Program, Center for Healthcare Quality and Analytics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Despoina M Galetaki
- Pediatric IDEAS Research Group of the Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lauren Gianchetti
- Pediatric IDEAS Research Group of the Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Laura A Vella
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Yun Li
- Pediatric IDEAS Research Group of the Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jain A, Daoud D, Kees-Folts D, Freeman MA, Butt F, Abendroth CS, Shike H, Kadry Z. Steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression using alemtuzumab in pediatric kidney transplantation: Long-term longitudinal follow-up. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14173. [PMID: 34687570 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a scarcity of long-term data on steroid-free immunosuppression using alemtuzumab in pediatric kidney transplantation (KTx). This study examines long-term outcomes with alemtuzumab without steroid maintenance therapy in pediatric KTx. METHODS From July 2005 to June 2015, 71 pediatric KTx recipients received alemtuzumab without steroid maintenance. They were followed from 4.1 to 14.1 years post KTx. RESULTS Patient survival: One child expired with a functioning graft from post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Patient survival was 98.6%. Graft survival: Eighteen grafts were lost (16 from chronic rejection). Graft survival at 5 and 10 years was 92.3% and 61.3%, respectively. Rejection: Twenty-three (32.4%) patients were free from T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), 16 (22.5%) had >3 episodes. Sixteen (22.5%) were treated for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Infection: Twenty-three children developed Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), 5 developed cytomegalovirus (CMV), and 20 developed BK virus infection. Four (5.6%) developed PTLD. Twenty-two (31.0%) required treatment for neutropenia. Growth parameters: Mean height and weight increased by 0.56 and 0.69 SDS (standard deviation score), respectively. Body mass index increased by 5.1 kg/m2 at 10 years. Less than 40% required antihypertensive medications at all-time points. CONCLUSION Alemtuzumab, without corticosteroid maintenance, offers 98.6% patient survival at 14 years with five and 10-year graft survival of 92.3% and 61.3%, respectively. TCMR and AMR requiring treatment were 67.4% and 22.5%, respectively. CMV, EBV, and BK viremia rates were 7.0%, 32.4%, and 28.2%, respectively. Thirty-one percent were treated for neutropenia; 5.6% developed PTLD. There were improvements in growth parameters and blood pressure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashokkumar Jain
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Deborah Daoud
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Deborah Kees-Folts
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Pediatrics, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael A Freeman
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Pediatrics, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Fauzia Butt
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Catherine S Abendroth
- Department of Pathology, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hiroko Shike
- Department of Pathology, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Zakiyah Kadry
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chukwu CA, Spiers HV, Middleton R, Kalra PA, Asderakis A, Rao A, Augustine T. Alemtuzumab in renal transplantation. Reviews of literature and usage in the United Kingdom. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2022; 36:100686. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2022.100686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
17
|
Immunosuppressive Drugs. ENCYCLOPEDIA OF INFECTION AND IMMUNITY 2022. [PMCID: PMC8987166 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818731-9.00068-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Immunosuppressant is a class of medicines that inhibit or decrease the intensity of the immune response in the body. Most of these medications are used to allow the body less likely to resist a transplanted organ. In solid organ transplantation, immunosuppressive agents are needed for the activation of early-stage immunosuppression, the management of late-stage immunosuppression or for the maintenance of organ rejection. The emergence of novel agents and improvements in immunosuppression regimens after transplantation are significant factors leading to this progress. However, these drugs also increase the risk of infection, cancers and specific adverse side effects specific to each agent in patients particularly in pregnant women and fertility issues. Corona virus disease being hot topic of debate is has given positive outcome to immunosuppressive drugs however need more attention in future. Transplant centers across the world utilize multiple immunosuppression protocols; nevertheless, each patient can require an individually formulated immunosuppression regimen to manage the advantages and possible damage of treatment thus eliminating the likelihood of their primary disease recurrence.
Collapse
|
18
|
Inshasi JS, Alfahad S, Alsaadi T, Hassan A, Zein T, Mifsud VA, Nouri SI, Shakra M, Shatila AO, Szolics M, Thakre M, Kumar A, Boshra A. Position of Cladribine Tablets in the Management of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: An Expert Narrative Review From the United Arab Emirates. Neurol Ther 2021; 10:435-454. [PMID: 33891277 PMCID: PMC8062252 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-021-00243-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of immune reconstitution therapies (IRT) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is associated with a prolonged period of freedom from relapses in the absence of continuously applied therapy. Cladribine tablets is a disease-modifying treatment (DMT) indicated for highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) as defined by clinical or imaging features. Treatment with cladribine tablets is effective and well tolerated in patients with active MS disease and have a low burden of monitoring during and following treatment. In this article, an expert group of specialist neurologists involved in the care of patients with MS in the United Arab Emirates provides their consensus recommendations for the practical use of cladribine tablets according to the presenting phenotype of patients with RRMS. The IRT approach may be especially useful for patients with highly active MS insufficiently responsive to treatment with a first-line DMT, those who are likely to adhere poorly to a continuous therapeutic regimen, treatment-naïve patients with high disease activity at first presentation, or patients planning a family who are prepared to wait until at least 6 months after the end of treatment. Information available to date does not suggest an adverse interaction between cladribine tablets and COVID-19 infection. Data are unavailable at this time regarding the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination in patients treated with cladribine tablets. Robust immunological responses to COVID-19 infection or to other vaccines have been observed in patients receiving this treatment, and treatment with cladribine tablets per se should not represent a barrier to this vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihad S Inshasi
- Neurology Department, Rashid Hospital and Dubai Medical College, Dubai Health Authority (DHA), PO Box 4545, Dubai, UAE.
| | - Sarmed Alfahad
- Neurology Department, Neurospinal Hospital, Baghdad Medical College, Dubai, UAE
| | - Taoufik Alsaadi
- Neurology Department, American Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Dubai, UAE
| | - Ali Hassan
- Neurology Medical Clinic, Tawam Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Tayseer Zein
- Neurology Department, AlQassami Hospital, Sharjah, UAE
| | | | | | - Mustafa Shakra
- Department of Neurology, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | | | - Miklos Szolics
- Neurology Medical Clinic, Tawam Hospital, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Mona Thakre
- Neurology Department, Al Zahra Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | - Ajit Kumar
- Neurology Department, NMC Specialty Hospital, Al Nahda, Dubai, UAE
| | - Amir Boshra
- Merck Serono Middle East FZ Ltd, Dubai, UAE
- Merck KgaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Barbour M, Wood R, Harte T, Bushell TJ, Jiang HR. Anti-CD52 antibody treatment in murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis induces dynamic and differential modulation of innate immune cells in peripheral immune and central nervous systems. Immunology 2021; 165:312-327. [PMID: 34826154 PMCID: PMC9426620 DOI: 10.1111/imm.13437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Revised: 10/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Anti‐CD52 antibody (anti‐CD52‐Ab) leads to a rapid depletion of T and B cells, followed by reconstitution of immune cells with tolerogenic characteristics. However, very little is known about its effect on innate immune cells. In this study, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis mice were administered murine anti‐CD52‐Ab to investigate its effect on dendritic cells and monocytes/macrophages in the periphery lymphoid organs and the central nervous system (CNS). Our data show that blood and splenic innate immune cells exhibited significantly increased expression of MHC‐II and costimulatory molecules, which was associated with increased capacity of activating antigen‐specific T cells, at first day but not three weeks after five daily treatment with anti‐CD52‐Ab in comparison with controls. In contrast to the periphery, microglia and infiltrating macrophages in the CNS exhibited reduced expression levels of MHC‐II and costimulatory molecules after antibody treatment at both time‐points investigated when compared to controls. Furthermore, the transit response of peripheral innate immune cells to anti‐CD52‐Ab treatment was also observed in the lymphocyte‐deficient SCID mice, suggesting the changes are not a direct consequence of the mass depletion of lymphocytes in the periphery. Our study demonstrates a dynamic and tissue‐specific modulation of the innate immune cells in their phenotype and function following the antibody treatment. The findings of differential modulation of the microglia and infiltrating macrophages in the CNS in comparison with the innate immune cells in the peripheral organs support the CNS‐specific beneficial effect of alemtuzumab treatment on inhibiting neuroinflammation in multiple sclerosis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Barbour
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Rachel Wood
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Tanith Harte
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Trevor J Bushell
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Hui-Rong Jiang
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2021; 272:139-164. [PMID: 34796380 DOI: 10.1007/164_2021_548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Immunosuppression in lung transplantation is an area devoid of robust clinical data. This chapter will review the history of immunosuppression in lung transplantation. Additionally, it will evaluate the three classes of induction, maintenance, and rescue immunosuppression in detail. Induction immunosuppression in lung transplantation aims to decrease incidence of lung allograft rejection, however infectious risk must be considered when determining if induction is appropriate and which agent is most favorable. Similar to other solid organ transplant patient populations, a multi-drug approach is commonly prescribed for maintenance immunosuppression to minimize single agent drug toxicities. Emphasis of this review is placed on key medication considerations including dosing, adverse effects, and drug interactions. Clinical considerations will be reviewed per drug class given available literature. Finally, acute cellular, antibody mediated, and chronic rejection are reviewed.
Collapse
|
21
|
Balani SS, Jensen CJ, Kouri AM, Kizilbash SJ. Induction and maintenance immunosuppression in pediatric kidney transplantation-Advances and controversies. Pediatr Transplant 2021; 25:e14077. [PMID: 34216190 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Advances in immunosuppression have improved graft survival in pediatric kidney transplant recipients; however, treatment-related toxicities need to be balanced against the possibility of graft rejection. Several immunosuppressive agents are available for use in transplant recipients; however, the optimal combinations of agents remain unclear, resulting in variations in institutional protocols. Lymphocyte-depleting antibodies, specifically ATG, are the most common induction agent used for pediatric kidney transplantation in the US. Basiliximab may be used for induction in immunologically low-risk children; however, pediatric data are scarce. CNIs and antiproliferative agents (mostly Tac and mycophenolate in recent years) constitute the backbone of maintenance immunosuppression. Steroid-avoidance maintenance regimens remain controversial. Belatacept and mTOR inhibitors are used in children under specific circumstances such as non-adherence or CNI toxicity. This article reviews the indications, mechanism of action, efficacy, dosing, and side effect profiles of various immunosuppressive agents available for pediatric kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanthi S Balani
- Pediatric Nephrology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Chelsey J Jensen
- Solid Organ Transplant, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Anne M Kouri
- Pediatric Nephrology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Simone IL, Tortorella C, Ghirelli A. Influence of Pregnancy in Multiple Sclerosis and Impact of Disease-Modifying Therapies. Front Neurol 2021; 12:697974. [PMID: 34276545 PMCID: PMC8280312 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.697974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose of this Review: This article is a systematic review on the influence pregnancy has on multiple sclerosis and the resulting impact of disease-modifying therapies. Findings: Multiple sclerosis predominantly affects young women with a clinical onset most often during the child-bearing age. The impact of multiple sclerosis and disease-modifying therapies on fertility, pregnancy, fetal outcome, and breastfeeding is a pivotal topic when it comes to clinical practice. The introduction of disease-modifying therapies has changed not only the natural history of the disease but also the perspective of pregnancy in women with multiple sclerosis. Family planning requires careful consideration, especially because many disease-modifying drugs are contraindicated during pregnancy. In this article, we review current evidence collected from published literature and drug-specific pregnancy registers on the use of disease-modifying therapies. Additionally, we discuss safety profiles for each drug and correlate them to both risk for the exposed fetus and risk for the mothers interrupting treatments when seeking pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Laura Simone
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Carla Tortorella
- Department of Neurosciences, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alma Ghirelli
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
CD52-targeted depletion by Alemtuzumab ameliorates allergic airway hyperreactivity and lung inflammation. Mucosal Immunol 2021; 14:899-911. [PMID: 33731828 PMCID: PMC8225558 DOI: 10.1038/s41385-021-00388-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Allergic asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder associated with airway hyperreactivity (AHR) whose global prevalence is increasing at an alarming rate. Group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) and T helper 2 (TH2) cells are producers of type 2 cytokines, which may contribute to development of AHR. In this study, we explore the potential of CD52-targeted depletion of type 2 immune cells for treating allergic AHR. Here we show that anti-CD52 therapy can prevent and remarkably reverse established IL-33-induced AHR by reducing airway resistance and alleviating lung inflammation. We further show that CD52 depletion prevents and treats allergic AHR induced by clinically relevant allergens such as Alternaria alternata and house dust mite. Importantly, we leverage various humanized mice models of AHR to show new therapeutic applications for Alemtuzumab, an anti-CD52 depleting antibody that is currently FDA approved for treatment of multiple sclerosis. Our results demonstrate that CD52 depletion is a viable therapeutic option for reduction of pulmonary inflammation, abrogation of eosinophilia, improvement of lung function, and thus treatment of allergic AHR. Taken together, our data suggest that anti-CD52 depleting monoclonal antibodies, such as Alemtuzumab, can serve as viable therapeutic drugs for amelioration of TH2- and ILC2-dependent AHR.
Collapse
|
24
|
Dong M, Emoto C, Fukuda T, Arnold DE, Mehta PA, Marsh RA, Vinks AA. Model-informed precision dosing for alemtuzumab in paediatric and young adult patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 88:248-259. [PMID: 34182590 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Alemtuzumab is a lymphodepleting monoclonal antibody utilized in conditioning regimens for allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). A recently proposed therapeutic range of 0.15-0.6 μg/mL on the day of transplantation is associated with better HCT outcomes. The purpose of this study was to characterize alemtuzumab population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and to propose individualized subcutaneous dosing schemes to achieve this optimal level for paediatric patients. METHODS Alemtuzumab concentration and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) profiles were obtained from 29 paediatric and young adult patients (median age 6.4 y; range 0.28-21.4 y) with nonmalignant disorders undergoing HCT. PK/PD analyses were performed using nonlinear mixed effects modelling. Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to evaluate different improved dosing approaches. RESULTS A one-compartment model with sequential zero- and first-order absorption adequately described subcutaneously administered alemtuzumab PK. Model fit was significantly improved by including allometrically scaled body weight on clearance (0.080 L/h/70 kg) and volume of distribution (17.4 L/70 kg). ALC reduction following subcutaneous alemtuzumab was swift. An inhibitory Emax model best characterized the relationship between alemtuzumab concentration and ALC. Emax and EC50 were estimated as 1.18 × 103 /μL and 0.045 μg/mL, respectively. The currently used per kg dosing was found to cause uneven alemtuzumab exposure across different age and weight cohorts. Simulations indicated optimal target achieving dose as allometry-based dose of 18 mg × (weight/70)0.75 or body surface area-based dose of 10 mg/m2 , divided over 3 days, with a potential individualized top-up dose; both of which yielded similar results. CONCLUSION An allometry- or body surface area-based starting dosing regimen in combination with individualized Bayesian PK estimation using concentration feedback is proposed for alemtuzumab precision dosing in children undergoing allogeneic HCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Dong
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Chie Emoto
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Tsuyoshi Fukuda
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Danielle E Arnold
- Division of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Immune Deficiency, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Parinda A Mehta
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Division of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Immune Deficiency, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Rebecca A Marsh
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Division of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Immune Deficiency, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Alexander A Vinks
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bach JF, Berche P, Chatenoud L, Costagliola D, Valleron AJ. COVID-19: individual and herd immunity. C R Biol 2021; 344:7-18. [PMID: 34213845 DOI: 10.5802/crbiol.41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus ensures protection against reinfection by this virus thanks to the combined action of neutralizing antibodies and T lymphocytes specific to viral proteins, in particular the Spike protein. It must be distinguished from the immune response that ensures healing of the infection following contamination that involves innate immunity, particularly type 1 interferons, and which is followed by adaptive cellular and humoral immunity. The importance of the effect of interferons is highlighted by the occurrence of severe forms of the disease in genetically deficient subjects or in patients with antibodies neutralizing type 1 interferon. Herd immunity is not an individual biological property. It is a mathematical property that qualifies the fact that when the proportion of subjects with individual immunity is high enough, there is little chance that an epidemic can occur. The level of that proportion-the herd immunity of the population can be computed under theoretical, often unrealistic, hypotheses, and is difficult to assess in natural conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-François Bach
- Institut Necker-Enfants Malades, CNRS UMR8253, Inserm UMR1151, Paris, France.,Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Lucienne Chatenoud
- Institut Necker-Enfants Malades, CNRS UMR8253, Inserm UMR1151, Paris, France.,Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Costagliola
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut Pierre Louis d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP), Paris, France
| | - Alain-Jacques Valleron
- Inserm U1195, Bâtiment Pincus - Hôpital du Kremlin-Bicêtre, 80 rue du Gal Leclerc 94276 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zwart TC, Guchelaar HJ, van der Boog PJM, Swen JJ, van Gelder T, de Fijter JW, Moes DJAR. Model-informed precision dosing to optimise immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation. Drug Discov Today 2021; 26:2527-2546. [PMID: 34119665 DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Immunosuppressive therapy is pivotal for sustained allograft and patient survival after renal transplantation. However, optimally balanced immunosuppressive therapy is challenged by between-patient and within-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability. This could warrant the application of personalised dosing strategies to optimise individual patient outcomes. Pharmacometrics, the science that investigates the xenobiotic-biotic interplay using computer-aided mathematical modelling, provides options to describe and quantify this PK variability and enables identification of patient characteristics affecting immunosuppressant PK and treatment outcomes. Here, we review and critically appraise the available pharmacometric model-informed dosing solutions for the typical immunosuppressants in modern renal transplantation, to guide their initial and subsequent dosing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom C Zwart
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Henk-Jan Guchelaar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Paul J M van der Boog
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; LUMC Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jesse J Swen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Teun van Gelder
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Johan W de Fijter
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; LUMC Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk Jan A R Moes
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Leiden Network for Personalised Therapeutics, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jorgenson MR, Marka N, Leverson GE, Smith JA, Odorico JS. Valganciclovir prophylaxis extension from 3 to 6 months in high-risk pancreas-transplant recipients does not impact incidence of cytomegalovirus infection at 12 months. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14379. [PMID: 34075624 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PROBLEM Incidence and impact of CMV infection in pancreas-transplant recipients (PTRs) in the valganciclovir prophylaxis era has not been completely elucidated. METHODS Adult D+/R- PTRs were divided into a current era (1/1/2011-12/31/17; 6-month PPX) and a historic era (1/1/2003-12/31/09; 3-month PPX). PRIMARY OBJECTIVE effect of prophylaxis extension on the incidence of CMV infection. SECONDARY OBJECTIVE impact of extension on valganciclovir-related toxicity (leukopenia) and transplant outcomes. RESULTS There were 177 D+/R- PTRs in the study period (historic:98, current:79). Prophylaxis extension resulted in significant reduction of CMV infection from 25.4% to 10.9% at 6 months, (57% reduction, p = .021). However, 1-year rates of CMV infection (historic:31% vs current:36%) and end-organ disease (historic:7.7% vs current:6.9%) were not different (p = .93). Prophylaxis extension significantly increased leukopenia (white blood cell count<3 K/uL) at 6 months (historic:9.5% vs current:28.6%, p = .018). On multivariable analysis prophylaxis extension was not associated with reduced rates of CMV infection (p = .99) or CMV end-organ disease (p = .3). Additionally, there was no significant difference in rejection (p = .2), graft survival (p = .08), death-censored graft survival(p = .07) or patient survival (p = .6). CONCLUSIONS Prophylaxis extension in D+/R- PTRs appears to delay time to first CMV but not reduce overall incidence. These findings suggest a hybrid approach, incorporating antiviral withdrawal and protocolized monitoring, may be needed to improve CMV-related outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret R Jorgenson
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Nicholas Marka
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Glen E Leverson
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jeannina A Smith
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jon S Odorico
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Franz BJ, Petraroia R, Faust CD, Crawford T, Smalls S, Vongsavanh C, Gibson K, Schmitz JL. Abrogating biologics interference in flow cytometric crossmatching. Hum Immunol 2021; 82:574-580. [PMID: 33934934 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2021.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
The flow cytometric crossmatch is currently the gold standard for evaluating donor and recipient histocompatibility. The assay however does have limitations and is sensitive to false positive reactions resulting from the presence of non-HLA antibodies or therapy related immune biologics. Such false positive reactions can lead to the inappropriate decline of an acceptable donor organ or unnecessary therapeutic intervention. Here we describe the successful validation of anti-idiotype blocking antibodies in prevention of false positive flow crossmatch results caused by biologic therapy. Blocking antibodies specific for the Fab portion of Rituximab and/or Alemtuzumab were incubated with biologic containing patient serum prior to use in flow cytometric crossmatching. Biologic blocking successfully negated false positive crossmatch results with Rituximab (B cell ave. % change = -97%) or Alemtuzumab (T cell ave. % change = -99%, B cell ave. % change = -95%) infused sera respectively. Simultaneous blocking of these biologics was also successful. A complex case is presented to demonstrate the application of this procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian J Franz
- Histocompatibility Laboratory, McLendon Clinical Laboratories, UNC Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Rosanne Petraroia
- Histocompatibility Laboratory, McLendon Clinical Laboratories, UNC Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Cynthia D Faust
- Histocompatibility Laboratory, McLendon Clinical Laboratories, UNC Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Tricia Crawford
- Histocompatibility Laboratory, McLendon Clinical Laboratories, UNC Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Shari Smalls
- Histocompatibility Laboratory, McLendon Clinical Laboratories, UNC Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Candy Vongsavanh
- Histocompatibility Laboratory, McLendon Clinical Laboratories, UNC Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Keisha Gibson
- Division Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - John L Schmitz
- Histocompatibility Laboratory, McLendon Clinical Laboratories, UNC Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
van den Hoogen MWF, Seghers L, Manintveld OC, Roest S, Bekkers JA, den Hoed CM, Minnee RC, de Geus HRH, van Thiel RJ, Hesselink DA. Care for the organ transplant recipient on the intensive care unit. J Crit Care 2021; 64:37-44. [PMID: 33784577 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
All transplant recipients receive tacrolimus, mycophenolate and glucocorticoids and these drugs have many side-effects and drug-drug interactions. Common complications include surgical complications, infections, rejection and acute kidney injury. Infections as CMV and PJP can be prevented with prophylactic treatment. Given the complexity of organ transplant recipients a multi-disciplinary team of intensivists, surgeons, pharmacists and transplant specialists is essential. After heart transplantation a temporary pacemaker is required until the conduction system recovers. Stiffening of the heart and increased cardiac markers indicate rejection. An endomyocardial biopsy is performed via the right jugular vein, necessitating its preservation. For lung transplant patients, early intervention for aspiration is warranted to prevent chronic rejection. Risk of any infection is high, requiring active surveillance and intensive treatment, mainly of fungal infections. The liver is immunotolerant requiring lower immunosuppression. Transplantation surgery is often accompanied by massive blood loss and coagulopathy. Other complications include portal vein or hepatic artery thrombosis and biliary leakage or stenosis. Kidney transplant recipients have a high risk of cardiovascular disease and posttransplant anemia should be treated liberally. After postmortal transplantation, delayed graft function is common and dialysis is continued. Ureteral anastomosis complications can be diagnosed with ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M W F van den Hoogen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - L Seghers
- Department of Pulmonology, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - O C Manintveld
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Roest
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J A Bekkers
- Department of Thorax Surgery, Thorax Center, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C M den Hoed
- Department of Gastroenterology, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R C Minnee
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H R H de Geus
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R J van Thiel
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D A Hesselink
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Binder C, Sellberg F, Cvetkovski F, Berglund E, Berglund D. Siplizumab, an Anti-CD2 Monoclonal Antibody, Induces a Unique Set of Immune Modulatory Effects Compared to Alemtuzumab and Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin In Vitro. Front Immunol 2020; 11:592553. [PMID: 33262770 PMCID: PMC7686512 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.592553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Antibodies are commonly used in organ transplant induction therapy and to treat autoimmune disorders. The effects of some biologics on the human immune system remain incompletely characterized and a deeper understanding of their mechanisms of action may provide useful insights for their clinical application. The goal of this study was to contrast the mechanistic properties of siplizumab with Alemtuzumab and rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (rATG). Mechanistic assay systems investigating antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cell phagocytosis and complement-dependent cytotoxicity were used to characterize siplizumab. Further, functional effects of siplizumab, Alemtuzumab, and rATG were investigated in allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction. Changes in T cell activation, T cell proliferation and frequency of naïve T cells, memory T cells and regulatory T cells induced by siplizumab, Alemtuzumab and rATG in allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction were assessed via flow cytometry. Siplizumab depleted T cells, decreased T cell activation, inhibited T cell proliferation and enriched naïve and bona fide regulatory T cells. Neither Alemtuzumab nor rATG induced the same combination of functional effects. The results presented in this study should be used for further in vitro and in vivo investigations that guide the clinical use of immune modulatory biologics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Binder
- Section of Clinical Immunology, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Research and Development, ITB-Med AB, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Felix Sellberg
- Section of Clinical Immunology, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Research and Development, ITB-Med AB, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Erik Berglund
- Research and Development, ITB-Med AB, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Division of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska Institute and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - David Berglund
- Section of Clinical Immunology, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Research and Development, ITB-Med AB, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Roemhild A, Otto NM, Moll G, Abou-El-Enein M, Kaiser D, Bold G, Schachtner T, Choi M, Oellinger R, Landwehr-Kenzel S, Juerchott K, Sawitzki B, Giesler C, Sefrin A, Beier C, Wagner DL, Schlickeiser S, Streitz M, Schmueck-Henneresse M, Amini L, Stervbo U, Babel N, Volk HD, Reinke P. Regulatory T cells for minimising immune suppression in kidney transplantation: phase I/IIa clinical trial. BMJ 2020; 371:m3734. [PMID: 33087345 PMCID: PMC7576328 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m3734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether reshaping of the immune balance by infusion of autologous natural regulatory T cells (nTregs) in patients after kidney transplantation is safe, feasible, and enables the tapering of lifelong high dose immunosuppression, with its limited efficacy, adverse effects, and high direct and indirect costs, along with addressing several key challenges of nTreg treatment, such as easy and robust manufacturing, danger of over immunosuppression, interaction with standard care drugs, and functional stability in an inflammatory environment in a useful proof-of-concept disease model. DESIGN Investigator initiated, monocentre, nTreg dose escalation, phase I/IIa clinical trial (ONEnTreg13). SETTING Charité-University Hospital, Berlin, Germany, within the ONE study consortium (funded by the European Union). PARTICIPANTS Recipients of living donor kidney transplant (ONEnTreg13, n=11) and corresponding reference group trial (ONErgt11-CHA, n=9). INTERVENTIONS CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ nTreg products were given seven days after kidney transplantation as one intravenous dose of 0.5, 1.0, or 2.5-3.0×106 cells/kg body weight, with subsequent stepwise tapering of triple immunosuppression to low dose tacrolimus monotherapy until week 48. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary clinical and safety endpoints were assessed by a composite endpoint at week 60 with further three year follow-up. The assessment included incidence of biopsy confirmed acute rejection, assessment of nTreg infusion related adverse effects, and signs of over immunosuppression. Secondary endpoints addressed allograft functions. Accompanying research included a comprehensive exploratory biomarker portfolio. RESULTS For all patients, nTreg products with sufficient yield, purity, and functionality could be generated from 40-50 mL of peripheral blood taken two weeks before kidney transplantation. None of the three nTreg dose escalation groups had dose limiting toxicity. The nTreg and reference groups had 100% three year allograft survival and similar clinical and safety profiles. Stable monotherapy immunosuppression was achieved in eight of 11 (73%) patients receiving nTregs, while the reference group remained on standard dual or triple drug immunosuppression (P=0.002). Mechanistically, the activation of conventional T cells was reduced and nTregs shifted in vivo from a polyclonal to an oligoclonal T cell receptor repertoire. CONCLUSIONS The application of autologous nTregs was safe and feasible even in patients who had a kidney transplant and were immunosuppressed. These results warrant further evaluation of Treg efficacy and serve as the basis for the development of next generation nTreg approaches in transplantation and any immunopathologies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02371434 (ONEnTreg13) and EudraCT:2011-004301-24 (ONErgt11).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy Roemhild
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Centre for Advanced Therapies (BeCAT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Natalie Maureen Otto
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Centre for Advanced Therapies (BeCAT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Guido Moll
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mohamed Abou-El-Enein
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Centre for Advanced Therapies (BeCAT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Kaiser
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Centre for Advanced Therapies (BeCAT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Gantuja Bold
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Schachtner
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mira Choi
- Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Oellinger
- Department of Abdominal and Transplant Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sybille Landwehr-Kenzel
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Centre for Advanced Therapies (BeCAT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Karsten Juerchott
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Birgit Sawitzki
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cordula Giesler
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Centre for Advanced Therapies (BeCAT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anett Sefrin
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Centre for Advanced Therapies (BeCAT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carola Beier
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Centre for Advanced Therapies (BeCAT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Dimitrios Laurin Wagner
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Centre for Advanced Therapies (BeCAT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephan Schlickeiser
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mathias Streitz
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Schmueck-Henneresse
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Centre for Advanced Therapies (BeCAT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Leila Amini
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Centre for Advanced Therapies (BeCAT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrik Stervbo
- Medical Department 1, University hospitals of the Ruhr University of Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Nina Babel
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Medical Department 1, University hospitals of the Ruhr University of Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Hans-Dieter Volk
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Centre for Advanced Therapies (BeCAT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
- Institute of Medical Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Reinke
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Centre for Advanced Therapies (BeCAT), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Nephrology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Giannis D, Moris D, Cendales LC. Costimulation Blockade in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation. Front Immunol 2020; 11:544186. [PMID: 33042138 PMCID: PMC7527523 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.544186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Vascular composite allotransplantation (VCA) is a field under research and has emerged as an alternative option for the repair of severe disfiguring defects that result from infections or traumatic amputation in a selected group of patients. VCA is performed in centers with appropriate expertise, experience and adequate resources to effectively manage the complexity and complications of this treatment. Lifelong immunosuppressive therapy, immunosuppression associated complications, and the effects of the host immune response in the graft are major concerns in VCA. VCA is considered a quality of life transplant and the risk-benefit ratio is dissimilar to life saving transplants. Belatacept seems a promising drug that prolongs patient and graft survival in kidney transplantation and it could also be an alternative approach to VCA immunosuppression. In this review, we are summarizing current literature about the role of costimulation blockade, with a focus on belatacept in VCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Giannis
- Institute of Health Innovations and Outcomes Research, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, United States
| | - Dimitrios Moris
- Duke Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Linda C. Cendales
- Duke Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Niu Q, Mendoza Rojas A, Dieterich M, Roelen DL, Clahsen-van Groningen MC, Wang L, van Gelder T, Hesselink DA, van Besouw NM, Baan CC. Immunosuppression Has Long-Lasting Effects on Circulating Follicular Regulatory T Cells in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Front Immunol 2020; 11:1972. [PMID: 32983131 PMCID: PMC7483930 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: FoxP3+ follicular regulatory T cells (Tfr) have been identified as the cell population controlling T follicular helper (Tfh) cells and B cells which, are both involved in effector immune responses against transplanted tissue. Methods: To understand the biology of Tfr cells in kidney transplant patients treated with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combination immunosuppression, we measured circulating (c)Tfh and cTfr cells in peripheral blood by flow cytometry in n = 211 kidney transplant recipients. At the time of measurement patients were 5–7 years after transplantation. Of this cohort of patients, 23.2% (49/211) had been previously treated for rejection. Median time after anti-rejection therapy was 4.9 years (range 0.4–7 years). Age and gender matched healthy individuals served as controls. Results: While the absolute numbers of cTfh cells were comparable between kidney transplant recipients and healthy controls, the numbers of cTfr cells were 46% lower in immunosuppressed recipients (p < 0.001). More importantly, in transplanted patients, the ratio of cTfr to cTfh was decreased (median; 0.10 vs. 0.06), indicating a disruption of the balance between cTfr and cTfh cells. This shifted balance was observed for both non-rejectors and rejectors. Previous pulse methylprednisolone or combined pulse methylprednisolone + intravenous immunoglobulin anti-rejection therapy led to a non-significant 30.6% (median) and 51.2% (median) drop in cTfr cells, respectively when compared to cTfr cell numbers in transplant patients who did not receive anti-rejection therapy. A history of alemtuzumab therapy did lead to a significant decrease in cTfr cells of 85.8% (median) compared with patients not treated with anti-rejection therapy (p < 0.0001). No association with tacrolimus or MMF pre-dose concentrations was found. Conclusion: This cross-sectional study reveals that anti-rejection therapy with alemtuzumab significantly lowers the number of cTfr cells in kidney transplant recipients. The observed profound effects by these agents might dysregulate cTfr functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Niu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,The Rotterdam Transplant Group, Department of Internal Medicine-Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Aleixandra Mendoza Rojas
- The Rotterdam Transplant Group, Department of Internal Medicine-Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Rotterdam Transplant Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,The Rotterdam Transplant Group, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Dieterich
- The Rotterdam Transplant Group, Department of Internal Medicine-Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Rotterdam Transplant Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Dave L Roelen
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Marian C Clahsen-van Groningen
- The Rotterdam Transplant Group, Department of Internal Medicine-Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Rotterdam Transplant Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,The Rotterdam Transplant Group, Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Lanlan Wang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Teun van Gelder
- The Rotterdam Transplant Group, Department of Internal Medicine-Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Rotterdam Transplant Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,The Rotterdam Transplant Group, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Dennis A Hesselink
- The Rotterdam Transplant Group, Department of Internal Medicine-Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Rotterdam Transplant Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nicole M van Besouw
- The Rotterdam Transplant Group, Department of Internal Medicine-Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Rotterdam Transplant Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Carla C Baan
- The Rotterdam Transplant Group, Department of Internal Medicine-Nephrology & Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Rotterdam Transplant Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
van der Zwan M, Leebeek FWG, Sandberg Y, Kruip MJHA, Hesselink DA. Acquired haemophilia A after alemtuzumab therapy. Haemophilia 2020; 26:e337-e339. [PMID: 32700327 DOI: 10.1111/hae.14107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke van der Zwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Rotterdam Transplant Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank W G Leebeek
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yorick Sandberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maasstad Hospital Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke J H A Kruip
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dennis A Hesselink
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Rotterdam Transplant Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Afzali S, Salehi S, Shahi A, Amirzargar A. B cell modulation strategies in the improvement of transplantation outcomes. Mol Immunol 2020; 125:140-150. [PMID: 32682148 DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2020.06.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Successful transplantation outcome is the final goal in most end stage and nonfunctional organs; however, despite using different therapeutic strategies, antibody-mediated rejection is still a big obstacle. B cells have a key role in transplant rejection by several functions, such as antibody production, antigen presenting, contribution in T cell activation, forming the germinal center, and tertiary lymphoid organs. Therefore, B cells modulation seems to be very crucial in transplant outcome. A double-edged sword function is considered for B cells during transplantation; On the one hand, antibody production against the transplanted organ induces antibody-mediated rejection. On the other hand, IL10 production by regulatory B (Breg) cells induces graft tolerance. Nowadays, several monoclonal antibodies (mAb) are available for B cell modulation that are routinely used in transplant recipients, among which rituximab (anti-CD20 mAb) act in eliminating B cells. However, there are some other monoclonal antibodies, such as epratuzumab and Inotuzumab ozogamicin (IO), which exert anti-CD22 activity, resulting in disruption of B cell functions and induction of tolerance in autoimmune disease or B cell malignancies; that notwithstanding, these mAbs have not yet been tried in transplantation. In this review, we focus on different methods for modulating the activity of B cells as well as induction of Breg cells, aiming to prevent the allograft rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shima Afzali
- Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Students' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Saeedeh Salehi
- Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abbas Shahi
- Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Aliakbar Amirzargar
- Department of Immunology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
van der Zwan M, Clahsen-Van Groningen MC, van den Hoogen MWF, Kho MML, Roodnat JI, Mauff KAL, Roelen DL, van Agteren M, Baan CC, Hesselink DA. Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Anti-thymocyte Globulin Treatment for Acute Kidney Allograft Rejection. Front Immunol 2020; 11:1332. [PMID: 32719676 PMCID: PMC7350932 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) is currently the treatment of choice for glucocorticoid-resistant, recurrent, or severe acute allograft rejection (AR). However, rATG is associated with severe infusion-related side effects. Alemtuzumab is incidentally given to kidney transplant recipients as treatment for AR. In the current study, the outcomes of patients treated with alemtuzumab for AR were compared with that of patients treated with rATG for AR. The patient-, allograft-, and infection-free survival and adverse events of 116 alemtuzumab-treated patients were compared with those of 108 patients treated with rATG for AR. Propensity scores were used to control for differences between the two groups. Patient- and allograft survival of patients treated with either alemtuzumab or rATG were not different [hazard ratio (HR) 1.14, 95%-confidence interval (CI) 0.48–2.69, p = 0.77, and HR 0.82, 95%-CI 0.45–1.5, p = 0.52, respectively). Infection-free survival after alemtuzumab treatment was superior compared with that of rATG-treated patients (HR 0.41, 95%-CI 0.25–0.68, p < 0.002). Infusion-related adverse events occurred less frequently after alemtuzumab treatment. Alemtuzumab therapy may therefore be an alternative therapy for glucocorticoid-resistant, recurrent, or severe acute kidney transplant rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke van der Zwan
- Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Rotterdam Transplant Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marian C Clahsen-Van Groningen
- Rotterdam Transplant Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Martijn W F van den Hoogen
- Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Rotterdam Transplant Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marcia M L Kho
- Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Rotterdam Transplant Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Joke I Roodnat
- Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Rotterdam Transplant Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Katya A L Mauff
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Dave L Roelen
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Madelon van Agteren
- Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Rotterdam Transplant Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Carla C Baan
- Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Rotterdam Transplant Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Dennis A Hesselink
- Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Rotterdam Transplant Group, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Costimulation between T cells and antigen-presenting cells is essential for the regulation of an effective alloimmune response and is not targeted with the conventional immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation. Costimulation blockade therapy with biologicals allows precise targeting of the immune response but without non-immune adverse events. Multiple costimulation blockade approaches have been developed that inhibit the alloimmune response in kidney transplant recipients with varying degrees of success. Belatacept, an immunosuppressive drug that selectively targets the CD28-CD80/CD86 pathway, is the only costimulation blockade therapy that is currently approved for kidney transplant recipients. In the last decade, belatacept therapy has been shown to be a promising therapy in subgroups of kidney transplant recipients; however, the widespread use of belatacept has been tempered by an increased risk of acute kidney transplant rejection. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the costimulation blockade therapies that are currently in use or being developed for kidney transplant indications.
Collapse
|
38
|
AlSharoqi IA, Aljumah M, Bohlega S, Boz C, Daif A, El-Koussa S, Inshasi J, Kurtuncu M, Müller T, Retief C, Sahraian MA, Shaygannejad V, Slassi I, Taha K, Zakaria M, Sørensen PS. Immune Reconstitution Therapy or Continuous Immunosuppression for the Management of Active Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients? A Narrative Review. Neurol Ther 2020; 9:55-66. [PMID: 32297127 PMCID: PMC7229056 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-020-00187-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The majority of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) available for the management of active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RMS) depend on continuous drug intake for maintained efficacy, with escalation to a more active drug when an unacceptable level of disease activity returns. Among continuously applied regimens, interferons and glatiramer acetate act as immunomodulators, while dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, ocrelizumab, natalizumab and teriflunomide are associated with continuous immunosuppression. By contrast, immune reconstitution therapy (IRT) provides efficacy that outlasts a short course of treatment. Autologous hemopoietic stem cell transplantation is perhaps the classic example of IRT, but this invasive and intensive therapy has challenging side-effects. A short treatment course of a pharmacologic agent hypothesized to act as an IRT, such as Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg or alemtuzumab, can provide long-term suppression of MS disease activity, without need for continuous treatment (the anti-CD20 mechanism of ocrelizumab has the potential to act as an IRT, but is administered continuously, at 6-monthly intervals). Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg shows some selectivity in targeting adaptive immunity with a lesser effect on innate immunity. The introduction of IRT-like disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) challenges the traditional maintenance/escalation mode of treatment and raises new questions about how disease activity is measured. In this review, we consider a modern classification of DMDs for MS and its implications for the care of patients in the IRT era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isa Ahmed AlSharoqi
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Salmaniya Medical Complex, PO Box 12, Manama, Bahrain.
| | - Mohamed Aljumah
- King Fahad Medical City, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Saeed Bohlega
- Department of Neurosciences, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Cavit Boz
- Department of Neurology, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
| | - Abdelkader Daif
- King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Jihad Inshasi
- Neurology Department, Rashid Hospital and Dubai Medical College, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Murat Kurtuncu
- Department of Neurology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Thomas Müller
- Department of Neurology, St. Joseph Hospital Berlin-Weissensee, Gartenstr. 1, 13088, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Mohammad Ali Sahraian
- MS Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Vahid Shaygannejad
- Isfahan Neurosciences Research Center, Alzahra Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Ilham Slassi
- Department of Neurology, Sheikh Khalifa Ibn Zaid Hospital, Mohammed VI University, Casablanca, Morocco
| | | | - Magd Zakaria
- Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Per Soelberg Sørensen
- Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, University of Copenhagen-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Trindade AJ, Thaniyavarn T, Townsend K, Klasek R, Tsveybel KP, Kennedy JC, Goldberg HJ, El-Chemaly S. Alemtuzumab as a Therapy for Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction in Lung Transplant Recipients With Short Telomeres. Front Immunol 2020; 11:1063. [PMID: 32547557 PMCID: PMC7270280 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Alemtuzumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD52 that causes lymphocyte apoptosis, is a form of advanced immunosuppression that is currently used as a therapy for refractory acute cellular rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients (1–3). Side effects of alemtuzumab include bone marrow suppression, infection, and malignancy. Whether alemtuzumab can be safely used in allograft recipients that have an increased propensity for bone marrow suppression due to telomeropathies is unknown. In a retrospective case series, we report outcomes associated with alemtuzumab in three lung allograft recipients with short telomere lengths, comparing endpoints such as leukopenia, transfusion needs, infection, hospitalization and survival to those of 17 patients without known telomeropathies that received alemtuzumab. We show that the use of alemtuzumab in lung transplant recipients with short telomeres is safe, though is associated with an increased incidence of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia requiring packed red blood cell transfusions. Alemtuzumab appears to be an acceptable advanced immunosuppressive therapy in patients with telomeropathies, though given the design and scope of this study, the actual clinical effect needs further evaluation in larger trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil J Trindade
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Tany Thaniyavarn
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Keri Townsend
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Robin Klasek
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Karen P Tsveybel
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - John C Kennedy
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Hilary J Goldberg
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Souheil El-Chemaly
- Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Guthoff M, Berger K, Althaus K, Mühlbacher T, Bakchoul T, Steurer W, Nadalin S, Königsrainer A, Heyne N. Low-dose alemtuzumab induction in a tailored immunosuppression protocol for sensitized kidney transplant recipients. BMC Nephrol 2020; 21:178. [PMID: 32404066 PMCID: PMC7218828 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-020-01767-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Induction therapy is crucial in kidney transplantation and constitutes an important cornerstone for long-term allograft survival. Alemtuzumab is a depleting CD52-specific antibody with T- and B-cell activity, leading to prolonged lymphocyte depletion for up to 12 months, with profound immunosuppression and an associated risk of serious infections. Current concepts aim to optimize dosing strategies to reduce side effects. Here we present data from an ongoing centre protocol consisting of low-dose alemtuzumab induction and tailored immunosuppression in sensitized patients undergoing kidney transplantation. Methods 10-year results of the protocol were analysed. Low-dose alemtuzumab induction consisted of a single dose of 20 mg intraoperatively, followed by tacrolimus and corticosteroids for initial immunosuppression, with mycophenolate mofetil suspended until a total lymphocyte count (TLC) >5% or 200/μl was reached. Results Between 01/2007 and 04/2017, 46 patients were treated in accordance with the protocol in 48 kidney transplantations. Median PRAmax was 43 [22-76; IQR] %; all patients had negative CDC-crossmatch prior to transplantation. Low-dose alemtuzumab was well tolerated. Median time to TLC recovery was 77 [62-127; IQR] d. Within a median follow-up of 3.3 [1.5-5.6; IQR] years, 12 (25%) patients developed BPAR, 10 of which were antibody-mediated (3 acute, 7 chronic ABMR). Death-censored 5-year allograft survival was 79.2%, with an excellent allograft function at the end of follow-up. There was no increased rate of infections, in particular viral infections. Conclusions Our protocol, comprising low-dose alemtuzumab induction, initial suspension of mycophenolate mofetil and triple maintenance immunosuppression, provides excellent patient and allograft outcome in sensitized renal allograft recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Guthoff
- Department of Diabetology, Endocrinology, Nephrology, Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.,Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 47, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.,German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Kilian Berger
- Department of Diabetology, Endocrinology, Nephrology, Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Karina Althaus
- Center for Clinical Transfusion Medicine, Otfried-Müller-Str. 4/1, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Mühlbacher
- Department of Diabetology, Endocrinology, Nephrology, Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.,Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 47, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.,German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Tamam Bakchoul
- Center for Clinical Transfusion Medicine, Otfried-Müller-Str. 4/1, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Steurer
- Department of General- and Visceral Surgery, Leonberg Hospital, Rutesheimer Str. 50, 71229, Leonberg, Germany
| | - Silvio Nadalin
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Alfred Königsrainer
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nils Heyne
- Department of Diabetology, Endocrinology, Nephrology, Section of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. .,Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 47, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. .,German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), Neuherberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
van der Zwan M, Hesselink DA, Brusse E, van Doorn PA, van den Hoogen MWF, de Weerd AE, Jacobs BC. Guillain-Barré syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy after alemtuzumab therapy in kidney transplant recipients. NEUROLOGY-NEUROIMMUNOLOGY & NEUROINFLAMMATION 2020; 7:7/4/e721. [PMID: 32299841 PMCID: PMC7188471 DOI: 10.1212/nxi.0000000000000721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke van der Zwan
- From the Department of Internal Medicine (M.Z., D.A.H., M.W.F.H., A.E.W.), Division of Nephrology and Transplantation; Rotterdam Transplant Group (M.Z., D.A.H., M.W.F.H., A.E.W.); Department of Neurology (E.B., P.A.D., B.C.J.); and Immunology (E.B., P.A.D., B.C.J.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Dennis A Hesselink
- From the Department of Internal Medicine (M.Z., D.A.H., M.W.F.H., A.E.W.), Division of Nephrology and Transplantation; Rotterdam Transplant Group (M.Z., D.A.H., M.W.F.H., A.E.W.); Department of Neurology (E.B., P.A.D., B.C.J.); and Immunology (E.B., P.A.D., B.C.J.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Brusse
- From the Department of Internal Medicine (M.Z., D.A.H., M.W.F.H., A.E.W.), Division of Nephrology and Transplantation; Rotterdam Transplant Group (M.Z., D.A.H., M.W.F.H., A.E.W.); Department of Neurology (E.B., P.A.D., B.C.J.); and Immunology (E.B., P.A.D., B.C.J.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter A van Doorn
- From the Department of Internal Medicine (M.Z., D.A.H., M.W.F.H., A.E.W.), Division of Nephrology and Transplantation; Rotterdam Transplant Group (M.Z., D.A.H., M.W.F.H., A.E.W.); Department of Neurology (E.B., P.A.D., B.C.J.); and Immunology (E.B., P.A.D., B.C.J.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn W F van den Hoogen
- From the Department of Internal Medicine (M.Z., D.A.H., M.W.F.H., A.E.W.), Division of Nephrology and Transplantation; Rotterdam Transplant Group (M.Z., D.A.H., M.W.F.H., A.E.W.); Department of Neurology (E.B., P.A.D., B.C.J.); and Immunology (E.B., P.A.D., B.C.J.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Annelies E de Weerd
- From the Department of Internal Medicine (M.Z., D.A.H., M.W.F.H., A.E.W.), Division of Nephrology and Transplantation; Rotterdam Transplant Group (M.Z., D.A.H., M.W.F.H., A.E.W.); Department of Neurology (E.B., P.A.D., B.C.J.); and Immunology (E.B., P.A.D., B.C.J.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bart C Jacobs
- From the Department of Internal Medicine (M.Z., D.A.H., M.W.F.H., A.E.W.), Division of Nephrology and Transplantation; Rotterdam Transplant Group (M.Z., D.A.H., M.W.F.H., A.E.W.); Department of Neurology (E.B., P.A.D., B.C.J.); and Immunology (E.B., P.A.D., B.C.J.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tran LT, Carullo PC, Banh DPT, Vitu C, Davis PJ. Pediatric Liver Transplantation: Then and Now. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 34:2028-2035. [PMID: 32241678 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
This paper reviews the past 50 years of liver transplantation in children from the perspective of patient demographics, perioperative patient management, surgical techniques, immunosuppression and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieu T Tran
- Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Philip C Carullo
- Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Diem Phuc T Banh
- Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Chelsea Vitu
- Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Peter J Davis
- Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gale SE, Ravichandran B, Ton VK, Pham S, Reed BN. Alemtuzumab Induction Versus Conventional Immunosuppression in Heart Transplant Recipients. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2019; 24:435-441. [PMID: 31035777 DOI: 10.1177/1074248419841635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The use of alemtuzumab for induction therapy in orthotopic heart transplantation remains controversial, despite its observed benefits in other transplant populations. This study aimed to evaluate whether alemtuzumab conferred a lower risk of rejection while reducing toxicities commonly attributed to standard immunosuppression in orthotopic heart transplantation. We included adult patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation and received induction therapy with alemtuzumab (n = 26) or standard immunosuppression (n = 26). The primary end point was freedom from grade ≥2 rejection at 12 months. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups with the exception of poorer renal function in the alemtuzumab group (P < .05). The primary end point of freedom from grade ≥2 rejection at 12 months was not different between alemtuzumab and standard therapy (76.9% vs 96.2%, P = .077), likely due to similarities in the rates of antibody-mediated rejection in the 2 groups. However, grade ≥2 acute cellular rejection was considerably lower with alemtuzumab (0% vs 19.2%, P = .02), as was acute cellular rejection of any severity (50% vs 7.7%, P = .004). Deterioration in renal function was significantly greater among patients receiving standard therapy as evidenced by decreases in glomerular filtration rate (-25.6 vs -9.2 mL/min, P = .032). No differences in hematologic or infectious complications were observed. In conclusion, alemtuzumab reduced several important rejection-related outcomes while ameliorating the toxicities associated with standard immunosuppression therapy, making it a promising agent for induction in orthotopic heart transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stormi E Gale
- 1 Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Van-Khue Ton
- 3 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Si Pham
- 4 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Brent N Reed
- 1 Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mir-Bonafé J, Saceda-Corralo D, Vañó-Galván S. Adverse Hair Reactions to New Targeted Therapies for Cancer. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adengl.2019.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
45
|
Mir-Bonafé J, Saceda-Corralo D, Vañó-Galván S. Reacciones capilares de las nuevas terapias diana dirigidas contra el cáncer. ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2019; 110:182-192. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2018.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Revised: 09/27/2018] [Accepted: 10/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
|
46
|
Napier J, Rose L, Adeoye O, Hooker E, Walsh KB. Modulating acute neuroinflammation in intracerebral hemorrhage: the potential promise of currently approved medications for multiple sclerosis. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 2019; 41:7-15. [PMID: 30702002 DOI: 10.1080/08923973.2019.1566361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The secondary inflammatory injury following intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) results in increased morbidity and mortality. White blood cells have been implicated as critical mediators of this inflammatory injury. Currently, no medications have been clinically proven to ameliorate or beneficially modulate inflammation, or to improve outcomes by any mechanism, following ICH. However, other neuroinflammatory conditions, such as multiple sclerosis, have approved pharmacologic therapies that modulate the inflammatory response and minimize the damage caused by inflammatory cells. Thus, there is substantial interest in existing therapies for neuroinflammation and their potential applicability to other acute neurological diseases such as ICH. In this review, we examined the mechanism of action of twelve currently approved medications for multiple sclerosis: alemtuzumab, daclizumab, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate, interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, mitoxantrone, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, rituximab, teriflunomide. We analyzed the existing literature pertaining to the effects of these medications on various leukocytes and also with emphasis on mechanisms of action during the acute period following initiation of therapy. As a result, we provide a valuable summary of the current body of knowledge regarding these therapies and evidence that supports or refutes their likely promise for treating neuroinflammation following ICH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarred Napier
- a College of Medicine , University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati , OH , USA
| | - Lucas Rose
- a College of Medicine , University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati , OH , USA
| | - Opeolu Adeoye
- b Department of Emergency Medicine , University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati , OH , USA.,c Gardner Neuroscience Institute , University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati , OH , USA
| | - Edmond Hooker
- b Department of Emergency Medicine , University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati , OH , USA
| | - Kyle B Walsh
- b Department of Emergency Medicine , University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati , OH , USA.,c Gardner Neuroscience Institute , University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati , OH , USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Li KHC, Ho JCS, Recaldin B, Gong M, Ho J, Li G, Liu T, Wu WKK, Wong MCS, Xia Y, Dong M, Tse G. WITHDRAWN: Acute Cellular Rejection and Infection Rates in Alemtuzumab vs Traditional Induction Therapy Agents for Lung and Heart Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:3739-3747. [PMID: 30577265 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 08/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published in Transplant Proc. 2018; 50 (10):3739-3747, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.08.018. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K H C Li
- Faculty of Medicine, Newcastle University, United Kingdom; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - J C S Ho
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - B Recaldin
- Faculty of Medicine, Newcastle University, United Kingdom
| | - M Gong
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - J Ho
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
| | - G Li
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - T Liu
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - W K K Wu
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - M C S Wong
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Y Xia
- Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - M Dong
- Department of Cardiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong Province, China
| | - G Tse
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Li KHC, Ho JCS, Recaldin B, Gong M, Ho J, Li G, Liu T, Wu WKK, Wong MCS, Xia Y, Dong M, Tse G. Acute Cellular Rejection and Infection Rates in Alemtuzumab vs Traditional Induction Therapy Agents for Lung and Heart Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Transplant Proc 2018; 50:3723-3731. [PMID: 30577263 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.08.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Revised: 08/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Heart and lung transplantation is a high-risk procedure requiring intensive immunosuppressive therapy for preventing organ rejection. Alemtuzumab, a CD52-specific monoclonal antibody, is increasingly used for induction therapy compared with conventional agents. However, there has been no systematic review comparing its efficacy with traditional therapeutic drugs. METHODS PubMed and EMBASE were searched to October 1, 2017, for articles on alemtuzumab in cardiothoracic transplant surgery. Of the 433 studies retrieved, 8 were included in the final meta-analysis. RESULTS In lung transplantation, alemtuzumab use was associated with lower odds of acute cellular rejection compared with antithymocyte globulin (odds ratio [OR], 0.21; 95% CI, 0.11-0.40; P < .001), lower acute rejection rates (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.55; P < .01), and infection rates (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.35-1.36; P = .33) when compared with basiliximab. Multivariate meta-regression analysis found that mean age, male sex, single lung transplant, double lung transplant, cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus status, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis, and mean ischemic time did not significantly influence acute rejection outcomes. For heart transplantation, alemtuzumab use was associated with lower acute rejection rates when compared with tacrolimus (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30-0.66; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Alemtuzumab use was associated with lower rejection rates when compared with conventional induction therapy agents (antithymocyte globulin, basiliximab, and tacrolimus) in heart and lung transplantation. However, this was based on observational studies. Randomized controlled trials are needed to verify its clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K H C Li
- Faculty of Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - J C S Ho
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - B Recaldin
- Faculty of Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - M Gong
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - J Ho
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
| | - G Li
- Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - T Liu
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - W K K Wu
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - M C S Wong
- The Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Y Xia
- Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - M Dong
- Department of Cardiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong Province, China.
| | - G Tse
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
van der Zwan M, Clahsen-Van Groningen MC, Roodnat JI, Bouvy AP, Slachmuylders CL, Weimar W, Baan CC, Hesselink DA, Kho MML. The Efficacy of Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin for Acute Kidney Transplant Rejection in Patients Using Calcineurin Inhibitor and Mycophenolate Mofetil-Based Immunosuppressive Therapy. Ann Transplant 2018; 23:577-590. [PMID: 30115901 PMCID: PMC6248318 DOI: 10.12659/aot.909646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background T cell depleting antibody therapy with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) is the treatment of choice for glucocorticoid-resistant acute kidney allograft rejection (AR) and is used as first-line therapy in severe AR. Almost all studies investigating the effectiveness of rATG for this indication were conducted at the time when cyclosporine A and azathioprine were the standard of care. Here, the long-term outcome of rATG for AR in patients using the current standard immunosuppressive therapy (i.e., tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil) is described. Material/Methods Between 2002 to 2012, 108 patients were treated with rATG for AR. Data on kidney function in the year following rATG and long-term outcomes were collected. Results Overall survival after rATG was comparable to overall survival of all kidney transplantation patients (P=0.10). Serum creatinine 1 year after rATG was 179 μmol/L (interquartile range (IQR) 136–234 μmol/L) and was comparable to baseline serum creatinine (P=0.22). Early AR showed better allograft survival than late AR (P=0.0007). In addition, 1 year after AR, serum creatinine was lower in early AR (157 mol/L; IQR 131–203) compared to late AR (216 mol/L; IQR 165–269; P<0.05). The Banff grade of rejection, kidney function at the moment of rejection, and reason for rATG (severe or glucocorticoid resistant AR) did not influence the allograft survival. Conclusions Treatment of AR with rATG is effective in patients using current standard immunosuppressive therapy, even in patients with poor allograft function. Early identification of AR followed by T cell depleting treatment leads to better allograft outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke van der Zwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam Transplant Group, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marian C Clahsen-Van Groningen
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam Transplant Group, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Joke I Roodnat
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam Transplant Group, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anne P Bouvy
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam Transplant Group, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Casper L Slachmuylders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam Transplant Group, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Willem Weimar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam Transplant Group, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Carla C Baan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam Transplant Group, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Dennis A Hesselink
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam Transplant Group, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marcia M L Kho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam Transplant Group, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kocsik AS, Klein DE, Liedke M, Kaunzner UW, Nealon NM, Gauthier SA, Vartanian T, Perumal JS. Induction of disease remission with one cycle of alemtuzumab in relapsing–remitting MS. J Neurol 2018; 265:1226-1229. [DOI: 10.1007/s00415-018-8845-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2018] [Revised: 03/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|